What did we learn out of SN1987A neutrino observations? What do we still need for a full understanding? We select important issues debated in the literature on SN1987A. We focus the discussion mostly on the relevance of certain data features; on the role of detailed statistical analyses of the data; on the astrophysics of the neutrino emission process; on the effects of oscillations and of neutrino masses. We attempt to clearly identify those issues that are still open.

We propose a new parameterization of the antineutrino flux from core collapse supernovae, that allows an interpretation of its astrophysical parameters within the Bethe and Wilson scenario for the explosion, and that leads to a reasonable (smooth) behavior of the average energy and of the luminosity curve. We apply it to analyze the events observed by Kamiokande-II, IMB and Baksan detectors in correlation with SN1987A. For the first time, we consider in the same analysis all data characteristics: times, energies and angles of the observed events. We account for the presence of background and evaluate the impact of neutrino oscillations. The hypothesis that the initial luminous phase of emission (accretion) is absent can be rejected at the 2 % significance level. Without the need to impose external priors in the likelihood analysis, the best-fit values of the astrophysical parameters are found to be in remarkable agreement with the expectations of the standard core-collapse scenario; in particular, the electron antineutrino-sphere radius is 16 km, the duration of the accretion phase is found to be 0.55 s, and the initial accreting mass is 0.22 M(sun). Similarly the total energy emitted in neutrinos is 2.2*10^{53} erg, again close to the expectations. The errors on the parameters are evaluated and found to be relatively large, consistently with the limited number of detected events; the two dimensional confidence regions, that demonstrate the main correlations between the parameters, are also given.

We study SN1987A neutrino events through a likelihood analysis with one-component (cooling) and two-component (accretion and cooling) emission model. We show that there is a 3.2 sigma hint for the initial accretion phase.

A large fraction of SN1987A electron antineutrino events has been recorded in the first second. We study how this observation fits into the conventional paradigm for neutrino emission, and show that there is a 3.2 sigma hint for an initial accretion phase. This phase involves a large fraction of the energy emitted in neutrinos and antineutrinos, about 20 % or larger. The occurrence of neutrino oscillations strengthens these inferences. We discuss why three flavor oscillations with normal mass hierarchy are completely acceptable, whereas oscillations with inverted mass hierarchy require more troublesome interpretations, if theta(13) is above 0.5-1 degrees.

(abridged) We study the low energy events observed by Kamiokande-II. We focus on the event 6 of 6.3 MeV and also on the other events that at 1 sigma fall below the energy threshold: events 3,4,10,12. The volume distribution is not a uniform distribution at 3 sigma, that suggests the presence of background events close or at the border of the volume used for the analysis, including the events 3,4,10. We checked the expected energy distribution assuming that the signal is due to nubar(e)p-->e+n and that the average antineutrino energy is 14 MeV. The agreement with the observations is not perfect but it is acceptable at the 11 % confidence level if we include the peak of low energy background events; otherwise, we face a 2.9 sigma problem. The expected energy distribution implies that the evidence for supernova neutrinos is at 10 sigma and that 1-3 background events are plausible. This conclusion does not change strongly when we model the time distribution of the signal taking into account the presence of an initial luminous phase of neutrino emission. This suggests however that some of the early events are due to supernova neutrinos and not to background. In summary, we formulate the hypothesis that some of the observed low energy events are due to background and that some among them belong to a peculiar phase of emission, that could be further characterized by low energy neutrinos. Such an interpretation diminishes to a minimum the postulated number of background events and thus improves the agreement between the a priori and the a posteriori expectations on the number of background events. We argue on these grounds that there is no significant disagreement between the average energy of the supernova neutrinos seen in Kamiokande-II and the conventional expectations.

Supernovae (SN) and supernova remnants (SNR) have key roles in galaxies, but their physical descriptions is still incomplete. Thus, it is of interest to study neutrino radiation to understand SN and SNR better. We will discuss: (1) The ~10 MeV thermal neutrinos that arise from core collapse SN, that were observed for SN1987A, and can be seen with several existing or planned experiments. (2) The 10-100 TeV neutrinos expected from galactic SNR (in particular from RX J1713.7-3946) targets of future underwater neutrino telescopes.

We consider the impact of oscillations on 1-200 TeV neutrinos expected from RX J1713.7-3946. After a description of the nature of the source, we obtain a prediction for the neutrino fluxes, based on the intense gamma ray flux first seen by CANGAROO and recently measured by H.E.S.S. experiment. We study the effect of 3 flavor oscillations in detail and consider the impact on the muon flux induced by these high energy neutrinos, potentially observable by a neutrino telescope located in the Northern hemisphere. A detector in the Mediterranean with an effective area of 1 km^2 and unit detection efficiency should be able to see a signal of about 10 muons per year.

We reanalyze the neutrino events from SN1987A in IMB and Kamiokande-II (KII) detectors, and compare them with the expectations from simple theoretical models of the neutrino emission. In both detectors the angular distributions are peaked in the forward direction, and the average cosines are 2 sigma above the expected values. Furthermore, the average energy in KII is low if compared with the expectations; but, as we show, the assumption that a few (probably one) events at KII have been caused by elastic scattering is not in contrast with the 'standard' picture of the collapse and yields a more satisfactory distributions in angle and (marginally) in energy. The observations give useful information on the astrophysical parameters of the collapse: in our evaluations, the mean energy of electron antineutrinos is <E> =12-16 MeV, the total energy radiated around (2-3)*1.E53 erg, and there is a hint for a relatively large radiation of non-electronic neutrino species. These properties of the neutrino burst are not in disagreement with those suggested by the current theoretical paradigm, but the data leave wide space to non-standard pictures, especially when neutrino oscillations are included.

The aim of these notes is to provide a brief review of the topic of neutrino astronomy and in particular of neutrinos from core collapse supernovae. They are addressed to a curious reader, beginning to work in a multidisciplinary area that involves experimental neutrino physics, astrophysics, nuclear physics and particle physics phenomenology. After an introduction to the methods and goals of neutrinos astronomy, we focus on core collapse supernovae, as (one of) the most promising astrophysical source of neutrinos. The first part is organized almost as a tale, the last part is a bit more technical. We discuss the impact of flavor oscillations on the supernova neutrino signal (=the change of perspective due to recent achievements) and consider one specific example of signal in detail. This shows that effects of oscillations are important, but astrophysical uncertainties should be thought as an essential systematics for a correct interpretation of future experimental data. Three appendices corroborate the text with further details and some basics on flavor oscillations; but no attempt of a complete bibliographical survey is done (in practice, we selected a few references that we believe are useful for a `modern' introduction to the subject. We suggest the use of public databases for papers as SPIRES or NASA/ESO or for experiments as SPIRES or PaNAGIC to get a more complete information).