Normalized to: Corcione, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.02631 [pdf] - 2128527
Euclid preparation: VIII. The Complete Calibration of the
Colour-Redshift Relation survey: VLT/KMOS observations and data release
Euclid Collaboration;
Guglielmo, V.;
Saglia, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Galametz, A.;
Paltani, S.;
Bender, R.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Capak, P.;
Ilbert, O.;
Masters, D. C.;
Stern, D.;
Andreon, S.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R. A.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Casas, S.;
Castellano, M.;
Castignani, G.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gozaliasl, G.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hildebrandt, H.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Maraston, C.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. Benton;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nakajima, R.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Pasian, F.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pocino, A.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Riccio, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sanchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespi, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tramacere, A.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Whittaker, L.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2020-07-06
The Complete Calibration of the Colour-Redshift Relation survey (C3R2) is a
spectroscopic effort involving ESO and Keck facilities designed to empirically
calibrate the galaxy colour-redshift relation - P(z|C) to the Euclid depth
(i_AB=24.5) and is intimately linked to upcoming Stage IV dark energy missions
based on weak lensing cosmology. The aim is to build a spectroscopic
calibration sample that is as representative as possible of the galaxies of the
Euclid weak lensing sample. In order to minimise the number of spectroscopic
observations to fill the gaps in current knowledge of the P(z|C),
self-organising map (SOM) representations of the galaxy colour space have been
constructed. Here we present the first results of an ESO@ VLT Large Programme
approved in the context of C3R2, which makes use of the two VLT optical and
near-infrared multi-object spectrographs, FORS2 and KMOS. This paper focuses on
high-quality spectroscopic redshifts of high-z galaxies observed with the KMOS
spectrograph in the H- and K-bands. A total of 424 highly-reliable z are
measured in the 1.3<=z<=2.5 range, with total success rates of 60.7% in the
H-band and 32.8% in the K-band. The newly determined z fill 55% of high and 35%
of lower priority empty SOM grid cells. We measured Halpha fluxes in a 1."2
radius aperture from the spectra of the spectroscopically confirmed galaxies
and converted them into star formation rates. In addition, we performed an SED
fitting analysis on the same sample in order to derive stellar masses, E(B-V),
total magnitudes, and SFRs. We combine the results obtained from the spectra
with those derived via SED fitting, and we show that the spectroscopic failures
come from either weakly star-forming galaxies (at z<1.7, i.e. in the H-band) or
low S/N spectra (in the K-band) of z>2 galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.03106 [pdf] - 2124541
Euclid: Reconstruction of Weak Lensing mass maps for non-Gaussianity
studies
Pires, S.;
Vandenbussche, V.;
Kansal, V.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Clédassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Dubath, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Grupp, F.;
Hormuth, F.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Meylan, G.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Wang, Y.
Submitted: 2019-10-07, last modified: 2020-06-29
Weak lensing, which is the deflection of light by matter along the line of
sight, has proven to be an efficient method for constraining models of
structure formation and reveal the nature of dark energy. So far, most
weak-lensing studies have focused on the shear field that can be measured
directly from the ellipticity of background galaxies. However, within the
context of forthcoming full-sky weak-lensing surveys such as Euclid,
convergence maps (mass maps) offer an important advantage over shear fields in
terms of cosmological exploitation. While it carry the same information, the
lensing signal is more compressed in the convergence maps than in the shear
field. This simplifies otherwise computationally expensive analyses, for
instance, non-Gaussianity studies. However, the inversion of the non-local
shear field requires accurate control of systematic effects caused by holes in
the data field, field borders, shape noise, and the fact that the shear is not
a direct observable (reduced shear). We present the two mass-inversion methods
that are included in the official Euclid data-processing pipeline: the standard
Kaiser & Squires method (KS), and a new mass-inversion method (KS+) that aims
to reduce the information loss during the mass inversion. This new method is
based on the KS method and includes corrections for mass-mapping systematic
effects. The results of the KS+ method are compared to the original
implementation of the KS method in its simplest form, using the Euclid Flagship
mock galaxy catalogue. In particular, we estimate the quality of the
reconstruction by comparing the two-point correlation functions and third- and
fourth- order moments obtained from shear and convergence maps, and we analyse
each systematic effect independently and simultaneously...
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.07676 [pdf] - 2084011
Euclid: Nonparametric point spread function field recovery through
interpolation on a graph Laplacian
Schmitz, M. A.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Mboula, F. Ngole;
Auricchio, N.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Capobianco, R. I. Vito;
Clédassou, R.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Garilli, B.;
Hormuth, F.;
Hu, D.;
Israel, H.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R. J.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J. D.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R. P.;
Schneider, P.;
Serrano, S.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vuerli, C.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-17, last modified: 2020-04-27
Context. Future weak lensing surveys, such as the Euclid mission, will
attempt to measure the shapes of billions of galaxies in order to derive
cosmological information. These surveys will attain very low levels of
statistical error, and systematic errors must be extremely well controlled. In
particular, the point spread function (PSF) must be estimated using stars in
the field, and recovered with high accuracy.
Aims. The aims of this paper are twofold. Firstly, we took steps toward a
nonparametric method to address the issue of recovering the PSF field, namely
that of finding the correct PSF at the position of any galaxy in the field,
applicable to Euclid. Our approach relies solely on the data, as opposed to
parametric methods that make use of our knowledge of the instrument. Secondly,
we studied the impact of imperfect PSF models on the shape measurement of
galaxies themselves, and whether common assumptions about this impact hold true
in an Euclid scenario.
Methods. We extended the recently proposed resolved components analysis
approach, which performs super-resolution on a field of under-sampled
observations of a spatially varying, image-valued function. We added a spatial
interpolation component to the method, making it a true 2-dimensional PSF
model. We compared our approach to PSFEx, then quantified the impact of PSF
recovery errors on galaxy shape measurements through image simulations.
Results. Our approach yields an improvement over PSFEx in terms of the PSF
model and on observed galaxy shape errors, though it is at present far from
reaching the required Euclid accuracy. We also find that the usual formalism
used for the propagation of PSF model errors to weak lensing quantities no
longer holds in the case of an Euclid-like PSF. In particular, different shape
measurement approaches can react differently to the same PSF modeling errors.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.07326 [pdf] - 2085090
Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage
IV cosmic shear experiments
Deshpande, A. C.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Taylor, P. L.;
Casas, S.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J. L.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-16, last modified: 2020-04-01
Stage IV weak lensing experiments will offer more than an order of magnitude
leap in precision. We must therefore ensure that our analyses remain accurate
in this new era. Accordingly, previously ignored systematic effects must be
addressed. In this work, we evaluate the impact of the reduced shear
approximation and magnification bias, on the information obtained from the
angular power spectrum. To first-order, the statistics of reduced shear, a
combination of shear and convergence, are taken to be equal to those of shear.
However, this approximation can induce a bias in the cosmological parameters
that can no longer be neglected. A separate bias arises from the statistics of
shear being altered by the preferential selection of galaxies and the dilution
of their surface densities, in high-magnification regions. The corrections for
these systematic effects take similar forms, allowing them to be treated
together. We calculated the impact of neglecting these effects on the
cosmological parameters that would be determined from Euclid, using cosmic
shear tomography. To do so, we employed the Fisher matrix formalism, and
included the impact of the super-sample covariance. We also demonstrate how the
reduced shear correction can be calculated using a lognormal field forward
modelling approach. These effects cause significant biases in Omega_m, sigma_8,
n_s, Omega_DE, w_0, and w_a of -0.53 sigma, 0.43 sigma, -0.34 sigma, 1.36
sigma, -0.68 sigma, and 1.21 sigma, respectively. We then show that these
lensing biases interact with another systematic: the intrinsic alignment of
galaxies. Accordingly, we develop the formalism for an intrinsic
alignment-enhanced lensing bias correction. Applying this to Euclid, we find
that the additional terms introduced by this correction are sub-dominant.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.07367 [pdf] - 2077067
Euclid: The selection of quiescent and star-forming galaxies using
observed colours
Bisigello, L.;
Kuchner, U.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Andreon, S.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Duc, P. -A.;
Garilli, B.;
Humphrey, A.;
Maraston, C.;
Moresco, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Tortora, C.;
Zamorani, G.;
Auricchio, N.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M. S.;
Dusini, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Masters, D. C.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Meylan, G.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sauvage, M.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-03-16
The Euclid mission will observe well over a billion galaxies out to $z\sim6$
and beyond. This will offer an unrivalled opportunity to investigate several
key questions for understanding galaxy formation and evolution. The first step
for many of these studies will be the selection of a sample of quiescent and
star-forming galaxies, as is often done in the literature by using well known
colour techniques such as the `UVJ' diagram. However, given the limited number
of filters available for the Euclid telescope, the recovery of such rest-frame
colours will be challenging. We therefore investigate the use of observed
Euclid colours, on their own and together with ground-based u-band
observations, for selecting quiescent and star-forming galaxies. The most
efficient colour combination, among the ones tested in this work, consists of
the (u-VIS) and (VIS-J) colours. We find that this combination allows users to
select a sample of quiescent galaxies complete to above $\sim70\%$ and with
less than 15$\%$ contamination at redshifts in the range $0.75<z<1$. For
galaxies at high-z or without the u-band complementary observations, the
(VIS-Y) and (J-H) colours represent a valid alternative, with $>65\%$
completeness level and contamination below 20$\%$ at $1<z<2$ for finding
quiescent galaxies. In comparison, the sample of quiescent galaxies selected
with the traditional UVJ technique is only $\sim20\%$ complete at $z<3$, when
recovering the rest-frame colours using mock Euclid observations. This shows
that our new methodology is the most suitable one when only Euclid bands, along
with u-band imaging, are available.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.04310 [pdf] - 1994125
Euclid preparation: V. Predicted yield of redshift 7<z<9 quasars from
the wide survey
Euclid Collaboration;
Barnett, R.;
Warren, S. J.;
Mortlock, D. J.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Conselice, C.;
Hewett, P. C.;
Willott, C. J.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Clédassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dusini, S.;
Ealet, A.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S. M.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Paykari, P.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pettorino, V.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
We provide predictions of the yield of $7<z<9$ quasars from the Euclid wide
survey, updating the calculation presented in the Euclid Red Book in several
ways. We account for revisions to the Euclid near-infrared filter wavelengths;
we adopt steeper rates of decline of the quasar luminosity function (QLF;
$\Phi$) with redshift, $\Phi\propto10^{k(z-6)}$, $k=-0.72$, and a further
steeper rate of decline, $k=-0.92$; we use better models of the contaminating
populations (MLT dwarfs and compact early-type galaxies); and we use an
improved Bayesian selection method, compared to the colour cuts used for the
Red Book calculation, allowing the identification of fainter quasars, down to
$J_{AB}\sim23$. Quasars at $z>8$ may be selected from Euclid $OYJH$ photometry
alone, but selection over the redshift interval $7<z<8$ is greatly improved by
the addition of $z$-band data from, e.g., Pan-STARRS and LSST. We calculate
predicted quasar yields for the assumed values of the rate of decline of the
QLF beyond $z=6$. For the case that the decline of the QLF accelerates beyond
$z=6$, with $k=-0.92$, Euclid should nevertheless find over 100 quasars with
$7.0<z<7.5$, and $\sim25$ quasars beyond the current record of $z=7.5$,
including $\sim8$ beyond $z=8.0$. The first Euclid quasars at $z>7.5$ should be
found in the DR1 data release, expected in 2024. It will be possible to
determine the bright-end slope of the QLF, $7<z<8$, $M_{1450}<-25$, using 8m
class telescopes to confirm candidates, but follow-up with JWST or E-ELT will
be required to measure the faint-end slope. Contamination of the candidate
lists is predicted to be modest even at $J_{AB}\sim23$. The precision with
which $k$ can be determined over $7<z<8$ depends on the value of $k$, but
assuming $k=-0.72$ it can be measured to a 1 sigma uncertainty of 0.07.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273 [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological
probes
Euclid Collaboration;
Blanchard, A.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Casas, S.;
Ilić, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Linder, E.;
Majerotto, E.;
Markovič, K.;
Martinelli, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Andreon, S.;
Aussel, H.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Ducret, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gómez-Alvarez, P.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Racca, G. D.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes;
Viel, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies
to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic
structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms
of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on
different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different
observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present
validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise
for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community
with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We
describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied
to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the
required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their
development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations,
reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less
than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on
the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their
own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We
find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining
freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different
cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be
reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a
pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of
cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological
constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at
least a factor of three.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.04707 [pdf] - 1905883
Euclid preparation III. Galaxy cluster detection in the wide photometric
survey, performance and algorithm selection
Euclid Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Vannier, M.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Adami, C.;
Ascaso, B.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Cappi, A.;
Díaz-Sánchez, A.;
Durret, F.;
Farrens, S.;
Gonzalez, A. H.;
Iovino, A.;
Licitra, R.;
Maturi, M.;
Mei, S.;
Merson, A.;
Munari, E.;
Pelló, R.;
Ricci, M.;
Rocci, P. F.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Sarron, F.;
Amoura, Y.;
Andreon, S.;
Apostolakos, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baugh, C. M.;
Borgani, S.;
Brodwin, M.;
Castander, F.;
Castignani, G.;
Cucciati, O.;
De Lucia, G.;
Dubath, P.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Mamon, G. A.;
Melin, J. B.;
Moscardini, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Radovich, M.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sereno, M.;
Weller, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Corcione, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Sirri, G.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Zamorani, G.
Submitted: 2019-06-11, last modified: 2019-06-19
Galaxy cluster counts in bins of mass and redshift have been shown to be a
competitive probe to test cosmological models. This method requires an
efficient blind detection of clusters from surveys with a well-known selection
function and robust mass estimates. The Euclid wide survey will cover 15000
deg$^2$ of the sky in the optical and near-infrared bands, down to magnitude 24
in the $H$-band. The resulting data will make it possible to detect a large
number of galaxy clusters spanning a wide-range of masses up to redshift $\sim
2$. This paper presents the final results of the Euclid Cluster Finder
Challenge (CFC). The objective of these challenges was to select the cluster
detection algorithms that best meet the requirements of the Euclid mission. The
final CFC included six independent detection algorithms, based on different
techniques, such as photometric redshift tomography, optimal filtering,
hierarchical approach, wavelet and friend-of-friends algorithms. These
algorithms were blindly applied to a mock galaxy catalog with representative
Euclid-like properties. The relative performance of the algorithms was assessed
by matching the resulting detections to known clusters in the simulations.
Several matching procedures were tested, thus making it possible to estimate
the associated systematic effects on completeness to $<3$%. All the tested
algorithms are very competitive in terms of performance, with three of them
reaching $>80$% completeness for a mean purity of 80% down to masses of
$10^{14}$ M$_{\odot}$ and up to redshift $z=2$. Based on these results, two
algorithms were selected to be implemented in the Euclid pipeline, the AMICO
code, based on matched filtering, and the PZWav code, based on an adaptive
wavelet approach. [abridged]
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09830 [pdf] - 1732659
Gaia Data Release 2. Calibration and mitigation of electronic offset
effects in the data
Hambly, N. C.;
Cropper, M.;
Boudreault, S.;
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Dolding, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Collins, R.;
Cross, N.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Baker, S.;
Smith, M.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Marchal, O.;
Katz, D.;
de Angeli, F.;
Busso, G.;
Riello, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Els, S.;
Corcione, L.;
Masana, E.;
Luri, X.;
Chassat, F.;
Fusero, F.;
Pasquier, J. F.;
Vetel, C.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The European Space Agency Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2 in
December 2013. This ambitious mission has strict requirements on residual
systematic errors resulting from instrumental corrections in order to meet a
design goal of sub-10 microarcsecond astrometry. During the design and build
phase of the science instruments, various critical calibrations were studied in
detail to ensure that this goal could be met in orbit. In particular, it was
determined that the video-chain offsets on the analogue side of the
analogue-to-digital conversion electronics exhibited instabilities that could
not be mitigated fully by modifications to the flight hardware. We provide a
detailed description of the behaviour of the electronic offset levels on
microsecond timescales, identifying various systematic effects that are known
collectively as offset non-uniformities. The effects manifest themselves as
transient perturbations on the gross zero-point electronic offset level that is
routinely monitored as part of the overall calibration process. Using in-orbit
special calibration sequences along with simple parametric models, we show how
the effects can be calibrated, and how these calibrations are applied to the
science data. While the calibration part of the process is relatively
straightforward, the application of the calibrations during science data
processing requires a detailed on-ground reconstruction of the readout timing
of each charge-coupled device (CCD) sample on each device in order to predict
correctly the highly time-dependent nature of the corrections. We demonstrate
the effectiveness of our offset non-uniformity models in mitigating the effects
in Gaia data. We demonstrate for all CCDs and operating instrument and modes on
board Gaia that the video-chain noise-limited performance is recovered in the
vast majority of science samples.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.6784 [pdf] - 713384
The Hot and Energetic Universe: The X-ray Integral Field Unit (X-IFU)
for Athena+
Barret, D.;
Herder, J. W. den;
Piro, L.;
Ravera, L.;
Hartog, R. Den;
Macculi, C.;
Barcons, X.;
Page, M.;
Paltani, S.;
Rauw, G.;
Wilms, J.;
Ceballos, M.;
Duband, L.;
Gottardi, L.;
Lotti, S.;
de Plaa, J.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Schmid, C.;
Akamatsu, H.;
Bagliani, D.;
Bandler, S.;
Barbera, M.;
Bastia, P.;
Biasotti, M.;
Branco, M.;
Camon, A.;
Cara, C.;
Cobo, B.;
Colasanti, L.;
Costa-Kramer, J. L.;
Corcione, L.;
Doriese, W.;
Duval, J. M.;
Fabrega, L.;
Gatti, F.;
de Gerone, M.;
Guttridge, P.;
Kelley, R.;
Kilbourne, C.;
van der Kuur, J.;
Mineo, T.;
Mitsuda, K.;
Natalucci, L.;
Ohashi, T.;
Peille, P.;
Perinati, E.;
Pigot, C.;
Pizzigoni, G.;
Pobes, C.;
Porter, F.;
Renotte, E.;
Sauvageot, J. L.;
Sciortino, S.;
Torrioli, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Willingale, D.;
de Vries, C.;
van Weers, H.
Submitted: 2013-08-30
The Athena+ mission concept is designed to implement the Hot and Energetic
Universe science theme submitted to the European Space Agency in response to
the call for White Papers for the definition of the L2 and L3 missions of its
science program. The Athena+ science payload consists of a large aperture high
angular resolution X-ray optics and twelve meters away, two interchangeable
focal plane instruments: the X-ray Integral Field Unit (X-IFU) and the Wide
Field Imager (WFI). The X-IFU is a cryogenic X-ray spectrometer, based on a
large array of Transition Edge Sensors (TES), offering 2.5 eV spectral
resolution, with ~5" pixels, over a field of view of 5 arc minutes in diameter.
In this paper, we briefly describe the Athena+ mission concept and the X-IFU
performance requirements. We then present the X-IFU detector and readout
electronics principles, the current design of the focal plane assembly, the
cooling chain and review the global architecture design. Finally, we describe
the current performance estimates, in terms of effective area, particle
background rejection, count rate capability and velocity measurements. Finally,
we emphasize on the latest technology developments concerning TES array
fabrication, spectral resolution and readout performance achieved to show that
significant progresses are being accomplished towards the demanding X-IFU
requirements.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3193 [pdf] - 429544
Euclid Definition Study Report
Laureijs, R.;
Amiaux, J.;
Arduini, S.;
Auguères, J. -L.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Cole, R.;
Cropper, M.;
Dabin, C.;
Duvet, L.;
Ealet, A.;
Garilli, B.;
Gondoin, P.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoar, J.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Holmes, R.;
Kitching, T.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Mellier, Y.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W.;
Rhodes, J.;
Criado, G. Saavedra;
Sauvage, M.;
Scaramella, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Warren, S.;
Bender, R.;
Castander, F.;
Cimatti, A.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Levi, M.;
Lilje, P.;
Meylan, G.;
Nichol, R.;
Pedersen, K.;
Popa, V.;
Lopez, R. Rebolo;
Rix, H. -W.;
Rottgering, H.;
Zeilinger, W.;
Grupp, F.;
Hudelot, P.;
Massey, R.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Miller, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Paulin-Henriksson, S.;
Pires, S.;
Saxton, C.;
Schrabback, T.;
Seidel, G.;
Walsh, J.;
Aghanim, N.;
Amendola, L.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Benabed, K.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Elbaz, D.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gavazzi, G.;
Helmi, A.;
Hook, I.;
Irwin, M.;
Kneib, J. -P.;
Kunz, M.;
Mannucci, F.;
Moscardini, L.;
Tao, C.;
Teyssier, R.;
Weller, J.;
Zamorani, G.;
Osorio, M. R. Zapatero;
Boulade, O.;
Foumond, J. J.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Guttridge, P.;
James, A.;
Kemp, M.;
Martignac, J.;
Spencer, A.;
Walton, D.;
Blümchen, T.;
Bonoli, C.;
Bortoletto, F.;
Cerna, C.;
Corcione, L.;
Fabron, C.;
Jahnke, K.;
Ligori, S.;
Madrid, F.;
Martin, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Pamplona, T.;
Prieto, E.;
Riva, M.;
Toledo, R.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Zerbi, F.;
Abdalla, F.;
Douspis, M.;
Grenet, C.;
Borgani, S.;
Bouwens, R.;
Courbin, F.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dubath, P.;
Fontana, A.;
Frailis, M.;
Grazian, A.;
Koppenhöfer, J.;
Mansutti, O.;
Melchior, M.;
Mignoli, M.;
Mohr, J.;
Neissner, C.;
Noddle, K.;
Poncet, M.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Shane, N.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Surace, C.;
Taylor, A.;
Verdoes-Kleijn, G.;
Vuerli, C.;
Williams, O. R.;
Zacchei, A.;
Altieri, B.;
Sanz, I. Escudero;
Kohley, R.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Astier, P.;
Bacon, D.;
Bardelli, S.;
Baugh, C.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Bianchi, D.;
Biviano, A.;
Branchini, E.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V.;
Clements, D.;
Colombi, S.;
Conselice, C.;
Cresci, G.;
Deacon, N.;
Dunlop, J.;
Fedeli, C.;
Fontanot, F.;
Franzetti, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gow, J.;
Heavens, A.;
Hewett, P.;
Heymans, C.;
Holland, A.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilbert, O.;
Joachimi, B.;
Jennins, E.;
Kerins, E.;
Kiessling, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kotak, R.;
Krause, O.;
Lahav, O.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lombardi, M.;
Magliocchetti, M.;
Maguire, K.;
Majerotto, E.;
Maoli, R.;
Marulli, F.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCracken, H.;
McLure, R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Merson, A.;
Moresco, M.;
Nonino, M.;
Norberg, P.;
Peacock, J.;
Pello, R.;
Penny, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Di Porto, C.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Radovich, M.;
Rassat, A.;
Roche, N.;
Ronayette, S.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schneider, P.;
Semboloni, E.;
Serjeant, S.;
Simpson, F.;
Skordis, C.;
Smadja, G.;
Smartt, S.;
Spano, P.;
Spiro, S.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tilquin, A.;
Trotta, R.;
Verde, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Williger, G.;
Zhao, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2011-10-14
Euclid is a space-based survey mission from the European Space Agency
designed to understand the origin of the Universe's accelerating expansion. It
will use cosmological probes to investigate the nature of dark energy, dark
matter and gravity by tracking their observational signatures on the geometry
of the universe and on the cosmic history of structure formation. The mission
is optimised for two independent primary cosmological probes: Weak
gravitational Lensing (WL) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). The Euclid
payload consists of a 1.2 m Korsch telescope designed to provide a large field
of view. It carries two instruments with a common field-of-view of ~0.54 deg2:
the visual imager (VIS) and the near infrared instrument (NISP) which contains
a slitless spectrometer and a three bands photometer. The Euclid wide survey
will cover 15,000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky and is complemented by two 20
deg2 deep fields. For WL, Euclid measures the shapes of 30-40 resolved galaxies
per arcmin2 in one broad visible R+I+Z band (550-920 nm). The photometric
redshifts for these galaxies reach a precision of dz/(1+z) < 0.05. They are
derived from three additional Euclid NIR bands (Y, J, H in the range 0.92-2.0
micron), complemented by ground based photometry in visible bands derived from
public data or through engaged collaborations. The BAO are determined from a
spectroscopic survey with a redshift accuracy dz/(1+z) =0.001. The slitless
spectrometer, with spectral resolution ~250, predominantly detects Ha emission
line galaxies. Euclid is a Medium Class mission of the ESA Cosmic Vision
2015-2025 programme, with a foreseen launch date in 2019. This report (also
known as the Euclid Red Book) describes the outcome of the Phase A study.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0636 [pdf] - 1025483
Autonomous Observations in Antarctica with AMICA
Di Rico, Gianluca;
Ragni, Maurizio;
Dolci, Mauro;
Straniero, Oscar;
Valentini, Angelo;
Valentini, Gaetano;
Di Cianno, Amico;
Giuliani, Croce;
Magrin, Demetrio;
Bonoli, Carlotta;
Bortoletto, Favio;
D'Alessandro, Maurizio;
Corcione, Leonardo;
Riva, Alberto
Submitted: 2010-03-02
The Antarctic Multiband Infrared Camera (AMICA) is a double channel camera
operating in the 2-28 micron infrared domain (KLMNQ bands) that will allow to
characterize and exploit the exceptional advantages for Astronomy, expected
from Dome C in Antarctica. The development of the camera control system is at
its final stage. After the investigation of appropriate solutions against the
critical environment, a reliable instrumentation has been developed. It is
currently being integrated and tested to ensure the correct execution of
automatic operations. Once it will be mounted on the International Robotic
Antarctic Infrared Telescope (IRAIT), AMICA and its equipment will contribute
to the accomplishment of a fully autonomous observatory.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.3403 [pdf] - 14728
System overview of the VLTI Spectro-Imager
Jocou, L.;
Berger, J. P.;
Malbet, F.;
Kern, P.;
Beckmann, U.;
Lorenzetti, D.;
Corcione, L.;
Causi, G. Li;
Buscher, D.;
Young, J.;
Gai, M.;
Weigelt, G.;
Zins, G.;
Duvert, G.;
Perraut, K.;
Labeye, P.;
Absil, O.;
Garcia, P.;
Loreggia, D.;
Lima, J.;
Rebordao, J.;
Ligori, S.;
Amorim, A.;
Rabou, P.;
Bouquin, J. B. Le;
Haniff, C.;
Coarer, E. Le;
Feautrier, P.;
Duchene, G.;
Benisty, M.;
Chelli, A.;
Herwats, E.;
Delboulbe, A.
Submitted: 2008-07-22
The VLTI Spectro Imager project aims to perform imaging with a temporal
resolution of 1 night and with a maximum angular resolution of 1
milliarcsecond, making best use of the Very Large Telescope Interferometer
capabilities. To fulfill the scientific goals (see Garcia et. al.), the system
requirements are: a) combining 4 to 6 beams; b) working in spectral bands J, H
and K; c) spectral resolution from R= 100 to 12000; and d) internal fringe
tracking on-axis, or off-axis when associated to the PRIMA dual-beam facility.
The concept of VSI consists on 6 sub-systems: a common path distributing the
light between the fringe tracker and the scientific instrument, the fringe
tracker ensuring the co-phasing of the array, the scientific instrument
delivering the interferometric observables and a calibration tool providing
sources for internal alignment and interferometric calibrations. The two
remaining sub-systems are the control system and the observation support
software dedicated to the reduction of the interferometric data. This paper
presents the global concept of VSI science path including the common path, the
scientific instrument and the calibration tool. The scientific combination
using a set of integrated optics multi-way beam combiners to provide
high-stability visibility and closure phase measurements are also described.
Finally we will address the performance budget of the global VSI instrument.
The fringe tracker and scientific spectrograph will be shortly described.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.1642 [pdf] - 14389
Fringe Tracker for the VLTI Spectro-Imager
Submitted: 2008-07-10
The implementation of the simultaneous combination of several telescopes
(from four to eight) available at Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI)
will allow the new generation interferometric instrumentation to achieve
interferometric image synthesis with unprecedented resolution and efficiency.
The VLTI Spectro Imager (VSI) is the proposed second-generation near-infrared
multi-beam instrument for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer, featuring
three band operations (J, H and K), high angular resolutions (down to 1.1
milliarcsecond) and high spectral resolutions. VSI will be equipped with its
own internal Fringe Tracker (FT), which will measure and compensate the
atmospheric perturbations to the relative beam phase, and in turn will provide
stable and prolonged observing conditions down to the magnitude K=13 for the
scientific combiner. In its baseline configuration, VSI FT is designed to
implement, from the very start, the minimum redundancy combination in a nearest
neighbor scheme of six telescopes over six baselines, thus offering better
options for rejection of large intensity or phase fluctuations over each beam,
due to the symmetric set-up. The planar geometry solution of the FT beam
combiner is devised to be easily scalable either to four or eight telescopes,
in accordance to the three phase development considered for VSI. The proposed
design, based on minimum redundancy combination and bulk optics solution, is
described in terms of opto-mechanical concept, performance and key operational
aspects.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.1062 [pdf] - 14268
VSI: the VLTI spectro-imager
Malbet, F.;
Buscher, D.;
Weigelt, G.;
Garcia, P.;
Gai, M.;
Lorenzetti, D.;
Surdej, J.;
Hron, J.;
Neuhaeuser, R.;
Kern, P.;
Jocou, L.;
Berger, J. -P.;
Absil, O.;
Beckmann, U.;
Corcione, L.;
Duvert, G.;
Filho, M.;
Labeye, P.;
Coarer, E. Le;
Causi, G. Li;
Lima, J.;
Perraut, K.;
Tatulli, E.;
Thiebaut, E.;
Young, J.;
Zins, G.;
Amorim, A.;
Aringer, B.;
Beckert, T.;
Benisty, M.;
Bonfils, X.;
Cabral, A.;
Chelli, A.;
Chesneau, O.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Corradi, R.;
de Becker, M.;
Delboulbe, A.;
Duchene, G.;
Forveille, T.;
Haniff, C.;
Herwats, E.;
Hofmann, K. -H.;
Bouquin, J. -B. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Loreggia, D.;
Marconi, A.;
Moitinho, A.;
Nisini, B.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Rebordao, J.;
Speziali, R.;
Testi, L.;
Vitali, F.
Submitted: 2008-07-07
The VLTI Spectro Imager (VSI) was proposed as a second-generation instrument
of the Very Large Telescope Interferometer providing the ESO community with
spectrally-resolved, near-infrared images at angular resolutions down to 1.1
milliarcsecond and spectral resolutions up to R=12000. Targets as faint as K=13
will be imaged without requiring a brighter nearby reference object. The unique
combination of high-dynamic-range imaging at high angular resolution and high
spectral resolution enables a scientific program which serves a broad user
community and at the same time provides the opportunity for breakthroughs in
many areas of astrophysic including: probing the initial conditions for planet
formation in the AU-scale environments of young stars; imaging convective cells
and other phenomena on the surfaces of stars; mapping the chemical and physical
environments of evolved stars, stellar remnants, and stellar winds; and
disentangling the central regions of active galactic nuclei and supermassive
black holes. VSI will provide these new capabilities using technologies which
have been extensively tested in the past and VSI requires little in terms of
new infrastructure on the VLTI. At the same time, VSI will be able to make
maximum use of new infrastructure as it becomes available; for example, by
combining 4, 6 and eventually 8 telescopes, enabling rapid imaging through the
measurement of up to 28 visibilities in every wavelength channel within a few
minutes. The current studies are focused on a 4-telescope version with an
upgrade to a 6-telescope one. The instrument contains its own fringe tracker
and tip-tilt control in order to reduce the constraints on the VLTI
infrastructure and maximize the scientific return.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.2694 [pdf] - 9115
Milli-arcsecond astrophysics with VSI, the VLTI spectro-imager in the
ELT era
Malbet, F.;
Buscher, D.;
Weigelt, G.;
Garcia, P.;
Gai, M.;
Lorenzetti, D.;
Surdej, J.;
Hron, J.;
Neuhäuser, R.;
Kern, P.;
Jocou, L.;
Berger, J. -P.;
Absil, O.;
Beckmann, U.;
Corcione, L.;
Duvert, G.;
Filho, M.;
Labeye, P.;
Coarer, E. Le;
Causi, G. Li;
Lima, J.;
Perraut, K.;
Tatulli, E.;
Thiébaut, E.;
Young, J.;
Zins, G.;
Amorim, A.;
Aringer, B.;
Beckert, T.;
Benisty, M.;
Bonfils, X.;
Chelli, A.;
Chesneau, O.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Corradi, R.;
De Becker, M.;
Delboulbé, A.;
Duchêne, G.;
Forveille, T.;
Haniff, C.;
Herwats, E.;
Bouquin, J. -B. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Loreggia, D.;
Marconi, A.;
Moitinho, A.;
Nisini, B.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Rebordao, J.;
Speziali, R.;
Testi, L.;
Vitali, F.
Submitted: 2008-01-17
Nowadays, compact sources like surfaces of nearby stars, circumstellar
environments of stars from early stages to the most evolved ones and
surroundings of active galactic nuclei can be investigated at milli-arcsecond
scales only with the VLT in its interferometric mode. We propose a
spectro-imager, named VSI (VLTI spectro-imager), which is capable to probe
these sources both over spatial and spectral scales in the near-infrared
domain. This instrument will provide information complementary to what is
obtained at the same time with ALMA at different wavelengths and the extreme
large telescopes.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701501 [pdf] - 88630
Mid Infrared Photometry of Mass-Losing AGB Stars
Submitted: 2007-01-17
We present ground-based mid-infrared imaging for 27 M-, S- and C-type
Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars. The data are compared with those of the
database available thanks to the IRAS, ISO, MSX and 2MASS catalogues. Our goal
is to establish relations between the IR colors, the effective temperature
$T_{eff}$, the luminosity $L$ and the mass loss rate $\dot M$, for improving
the effectiveness of AGB modelling. Bolometric (absolute) magnitudes are
obtained through distance compilations, and by applying previously-derived
bolometric corrections; the variability is also studied, using data accumulated
since the IRAS epoch. The main results are: i) Values of $L$ and $\dot M$ for C
stars fit relations previously established by us, with Miras being on average
more evolved and mass losing than Semiregulars. ii) Moderate IR excesses (as
compared to evolutionary tracks) are found for S and M stars in our sample:
they are confirmed to originate from the dusty circumstellar environment. iii)
A larger reddening characterizes C-rich Miras and post-AGBs. In this case, part
of the excess is due to AGB models overestimating $T_{eff}$ for C-stars, as a
consequence of the lack of suitable molecular opacities. This has a large
effect on the colors of C-rich sources and sometimes disentangling the
photospheric and circumstellar contributions is difficult; better model
atmospheres should be used in stellar evolutionary codes for C stars. iv) The
presence of a long-term variability at mid-IR wavelengths seems to be limited
to sources with maximum emission in the 8 -- 20 $\mu$m region, usually Mira
variables (1/3 of our sample). Most Semiregular and post-AGB stars studied here
remained remarkably constant in mid-IR over the last twenty years.