The capacity of Stage IV lensing surveys to measure the neutrino mass sum and differentiate between the normal and inverted mass hierarchies depends on the impact of nuisance parameters describing small-scale baryonic astrophysics and intrinsic alignments. For a Euclid-like survey, we perform the first combined weak lensing and galaxy clustering Fisher analysis with baryons, intrinsic alignments, and massive neutrinos for both hierarchies. We use a matter power spectrum generated from a halo model that captures the impact of baryonic feedback and adiabatic contraction. For weak lensing, we find that baryons cause severe degradation to forecasts of the neutrino mass sum, $\Sigma$, approximately doubling $\sigma_{\Sigma}$. We show that including galaxy clustering constraints from Euclid and BOSS, and cosmic microwave background (CMB) Planck priors, can reduce this degradation to $\sigma_{\Sigma}$ to 9% and 16% for the normal and inverted hierarchies respectively. The combined forecasts, $\sigma_{\Sigma_{\rm{NH}}}=0.034\, \rm{eV}$ and $\sigma_{\Sigma_{\rm{IH}}}=0.034\, \rm{eV}$, preclude a meaningful distinction of the hierarchies but could be improved upon with future CMB priors on $n_s$ and information from neutrinoless double beta decay to achieve a 2$\sigma$ distinction. The effect of intrinsic alignments on forecasts is shown to be minimal, with $\sigma_{\Sigma}$ even experiencing mild improvements due to information from the intrinsic alignment signal. We find that while adiabatic contraction and intrinsic alignments will require careful calibration to prevent significant biasing of $\Sigma$, there is less risk presented by feedback from energetic events like AGN and supernovae.

Baryonic effects on large-scale structure, if not accounted for, can significantly bias dark energy constraints. As the detailed physics of the baryons is not yet well-understood, correcting for baryon effects introduces additional parameters which must be marginalized over, increasing the uncertainties on the inferred cosmological parameters. Forthcoming weak lensing surveys are aiming for percent-level precision on the dark energy equation of state, so the problem must be thoroughly examined. We use a halo model with analytic modifications which capture the impact of adiabatic contraction of baryons and feedback on the matter power spectrum, and generalize the Navarro-Frenk-White profile to account for a possible inner core. A Fisher analysis predicts degradations of 40% in the $w_0$-$w_a$ Figure of Merit for a Euclid-like survey, and up to 80% for other cosmological parameters. We forecast potential inner core constraints of a few $\mathrm{kpc}$, while for a fixed inner core, adiabatic concentration and feedback parameters are constrained to a few percent. We explore the scales where baryons and dark energy contribute most to the Fisher information, finding that probing to increasingly non-linear scales does little to reduce degradation. Including external baryon information improves our forecasts, but limiting degradation to 1% requires strong priors. Adding Planck cosmic microwave background priors improves the Figure of Merit by a factor of 2.7 and almost completely recovers the individual marginalized errors on $w_0$ and $w_a$. We also quantify the calibration of baryon modelling required to reduce biases of dark energy forecasts to acceptable levels for forthcoming lensing surveys.