Normalized to: Contreras, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.12646 [pdf] - 2071919
Planck intermediate results. LVI. Detection of the CMB dipole through
modulation of the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect: Eppur si muove II
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sullivan, R. M.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2020-03-27
The largest temperature anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
is the dipole, which has been measured with increasing accuracy for more than
three decades, particularly with the Planck satellite. The simplest
interpretation of the dipole is that it is due to our motion with respect to
the rest frame of the CMB. Since current CMB experiments infer temperature
anisotropies from angular intensity variations, the dipole modulates the
temperature anisotropies with the same frequency dependence as the thermal
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) effect. We present the first (and significant)
detection of this signal in the tSZ maps, and find that it is consistent with
direct measurements of the CMB dipole, as expected. The signal contributes
power in the tSZ maps, modulated in a quadrupolar pattern, and we estimate its
contribution to the tSZ bispectrum, noting that it contributes negligible noise
to the bispectrum at relevant scales.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06205 [pdf] - 2009439
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-12-03
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying
the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009.
It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August
2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine
frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy
of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters
of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on
deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an
excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift,
describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just
six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power
spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better
than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now
known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the
success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of
structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes
introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with
other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe
and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and
evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight
areas ripe for further experimental advances.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.05419 [pdf] - 2097228
Cosmology in front of the background: studying the growth of structure
at CMB wavelengths
Submitted: 2019-10-11
Canada has thriving communities in CMB (cosmic microwave background) studies,
cosmology and submillimetre (submm) astronomy, with involvement in many
facilities that featured prominently in previous Astronomy Long Range Plans.
The standard cosmological model continues to be well fit using a small number
of parameters. No one expects this model to be complete and so we need to
continue to challenge it with data; moreover, it does not explain how galaxies
and other structures form. So, how do we improve the precision of our
understanding of structure formation within this model? Wavelengths from the
microwave to the submm will be particularly fruitful for answering this
question. That's because, in addition to the CMB anisotropies, there are other
signals that can be extracted from large maps at these wavelengths -
particularly the cosmic infrared and submm backgrounds, the thermal and kinetic
Sunyaev-Zeldovich effects, and CMB lensing. Such signals carry a wealth of
information about the cosmological model, as well as how dust, gas and
star-formation evolve within dark-matter halos. Cross-correlations between
these signals and those coming from the radio, optical and X-ray surveys, will
provide even more information. Canadians are already members of teams for
several related facilities and are working to be involved in others. In order
for Canada to be fully engaged in exploiting the detailed information coming
from these cosmological signatures, it is crucial that we find the resources to
participate competitively in a combination of projects currently being planned.
Examples include CMB-S4, CCAT-prime, AtLAST, a new camera for JCMT, balloon
projects such as BFORE and a future ambitious CMB satellite.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.05188 [pdf] - 1979507
Testing for directionality in the Planck polarization and lensing data
Submitted: 2018-07-13, last modified: 2019-10-04
In order to better analyse the polarization of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB), which is dominated by emission from our Galaxy, we need tools
that can detect residual foregrounds in cleaned CMB maps. Galactic foregrounds
introduce statistical anisotropy and directionality to the polarization
pseudo-vectors of the CMB, which can be investigated by using the D statistic
of Bunn and Scott. This statistic is rapidly computable and capable of
investigating a broad range of data products for directionality. We demonstrate
the application of this statistic to detecting foregrounds in polarization maps
by analysing the uncleaned Planck 2018 frequency maps. For the Planck 2018 CMB
maps, we find no evidence for residual foreground contamination. In order to
examine the sensitivity of the D statistic, we add a varying fraction of the
polarized thermal dust and synchrotron foreground maps to the CMB maps and show
the percent-level foreground contamination that would be detected with 95
percent confidence. We also demonstrate application of the D statistic to
another data product by analysing the gradient of the minimum-variance CMB
lensing potential map (i.e., the deflection angle) for directionality. We find
no excess directionality in the lensing potential map when compared to the
simulations provided by the Planck Collaboration.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06211 [pdf] - 1927941
Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lpez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-02
We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 Release of the
Planck CMB anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent with the
two previous Planck cosmological releases, but have smaller uncertainties
thanks to improvements in the characterization of polarization at low and high
multipoles. Planck temperature, polarization, and lensing data determine the
spectral index of scalar perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s}=0.9649\pm 0.0042$ at
68% CL and show no evidence for a scale dependence of $n_\mathrm{s}.$ Spatial
flatness is confirmed at a precision of 0.4% at 95% CL with the combination
with BAO data. The Planck 95% CL upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio,
$r_{0.002}<0.10$, is further tightened by combining with the BICEP2/Keck Array
BK15 data to obtain $r_{0.002}<0.056$. In the framework of single-field
inflationary models with Einstein gravity, these results imply that: (a)
slow-roll models with a concave potential, $V" (\phi) < 0,$ are increasingly
favoured by the data; and (b) two different methods for reconstructing the
inflaton potential find no evidence for dynamics beyond slow roll.
Non-parametric reconstructions of the primordial power spectrum consistently
confirm a pure power law. A complementary analysis also finds no evidence for
theoretically motivated parameterized features in the Planck power spectrum, a
result further strengthened for certain oscillatory models by a new combined
analysis that includes Planck bispectrum data. The new Planck polarization data
provide a stringent test of the adiabaticity of the initial conditions. The
polarization data also provide improved constraints on inflationary models that
predict a small statistically anisotropic quadrupolar modulation of the
primordial fluctuations. However, the polarization data do not confirm physical
models for a scale-dependent dipolar modulation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.02102 [pdf] - 1923489
Cosmological constraints on sterile neutrino oscillations from Planck
Submitted: 2018-12-05, last modified: 2019-07-25
Both particle physics experiments and cosmological surveys can constrain the
properties of sterile neutrinos, but do so with different parameterizations
that naturally use different prior information. We present joint constraints on
the 3$+$1 sterile neutrino model oscillation parameters, $\Delta m_{41}^2$ and
$\sin^22\theta$, with log priors on those parameters using mostly cosmological
data from the Planck satellite. Two cases are considered, one where the sterile
neutrino mixes with electron neutrinos solely, and another where the sterile
neutrino mixes exclusively with muon neutrinos, allowing us to constrain the
mixing angles $\sin^22\theta_{14}$ and $\sin^22\theta_{24}.$ We find that
cosmological data are inconsistent with strong hints of a sterile neutrino
coming from some oscillation channels of the LSND and MiniBooNE experiments,
under the assumption that the sterile neutrinos mix with a single neutrino
flavour. We also forecast the sensitivity with which future CMB experiments
should be able to probe $\Delta m_{41}^2$ and $\sin^22\theta$.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.02552 [pdf] - 1896098
Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-06-06
Analysis of the Planck 2018 data set indicates that the statistical
properties of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies
are in excellent agreement with previous studies using the 2013 and 2015 data
releases. In particular, they are consistent with the Gaussian predictions of
the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, yet also confirm the presence of several
so-called "anomalies" on large angular scales. The novelty of the current
study, however, lies in being a first attempt at a comprehensive analysis of
the statistics of the polarization signal over all angular scales, using either
maps of the Stokes parameters, $Q$ and $U$, or the $E$-mode signal derived from
these using a new methodology (which we describe in an appendix). Although
remarkable progress has been made in reducing the systematic effects that
contaminated the 2015 polarization maps on large angular scales, it is still
the case that residual systematics (and our ability to simulate them) can limit
some tests of non-Gaussianity and isotropy. However, a detailed set of null
tests applied to the maps indicates that these issues do not dominate the
analysis on intermediate and large angular scales (i.e., $\ell \lesssim 400$).
In this regime, no unambiguous detections of cosmological non-Gaussianity, or
of anomalies corresponding to those seen in temperature, are claimed. Notably,
the stacking of CMB polarization signals centred on the positions of
temperature hot and cold spots exhibits excellent agreement with the
$\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, and also gives a clear indication of how
Planck provides state-of-the-art measurements of CMB temperature and
polarization on degree scales.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.10033 [pdf] - 1979563
Towards detection of relativistic effects in galaxy number counts using
kSZ Tomography
Submitted: 2019-04-22
High-resolution, low-noise observations of the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) planned for the near-future will enable new cosmological probes based on
re-scattered CMB photons -- the secondary CMB. At the same time, enormous
galaxy surveys will map out huge volumes of the observable Universe. Using the
technique of kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich (kSZ) tomography these new probes can
be combined to reconstruct the remote dipole field, the CMB dipole as observed
from different vantage points in our Universe. The volume accessible to future
galaxy surveys is large enough that general relativistic corrections to the
observed distribution of galaxies must be taken into account. These corrections
are interesting probes of gravity in their own right, but can also obscure
potential signatures of primordial non-Gaussianity. In this paper, we
demonstrate that correlations between the reconstructed remote dipole field and
the observed galaxy number counts can in principle be used to detect general
relativistic corrections. We show that neglecting general relativistic
corrections leads to an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ bias on the inferred amplitude of
primordial non-Gaussianity, $f_{\rm NL}$. In addition, we demonstrate that the
reconstructed remote dipole field can provide useful constraining power on
various bias parameters appearing in the galaxy number counts, and can
significantly mitigate the effects of alignment bias.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.05629 [pdf] - 1858974
Taller in the saddle: constraining CMB physics using saddle points
Submitted: 2018-11-13, last modified: 2019-03-04
The statistics of extremal points in the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature (hot and cold spots) have been well explored in the literature, and
have been used to constrain models of the early Universe. Here, we extend the
study of critical points in the CMB to the set that remains after removing
extrema, namely the saddle points. We perform stacks of temperature and
polarization about temperature saddle points in simulations of the CMB, as well
as in data from the Planck satellite. We then compute the theoretical profile
of saddle-point stacks, given the underlying power spectra of the CMB. As an
example of the utility of such stacks, we constrain models of cosmic
birefringence, and compare the constraining power of the saddle points with
that of extremal points. We find that, in the specific example of
birefringence, we can place tighter constraints using saddle points in our
analysis than using extrema. In fact, we find our saddle-point analysis yields
close to optimal constraints, as seen by comparing to a power spectrum
analysis. We, therefore, suggest that stacking on saddle points may, in
general, be a useful way of testing for non-standard physics effects that
change the CMB power spectra.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.00132 [pdf] - 1755826
Planck intermediate results. LIII. Detection of velocity dispersion from
the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2017-07-01, last modified: 2018-08-23
Using the ${\it Planck}$ full-mission data, we present a detection of the
temperature (and therefore velocity) dispersion due to the kinetic
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ) effect from clusters of galaxies. To suppress the
primary CMB and instrumental noise we derive a matched filter and then convolve
it with the ${\it Planck}$ foreground-cleaned `${\tt 2D-ILC\,}$' maps. By using
the Meta Catalogue of X-ray detected Clusters of galaxies (MCXC), we determine
the normalized ${\it rms}$ dispersion of the temperature fluctuations at the
positions of clusters, finding that this shows excess variance compared with
the noise expectation. We then build an unbiased statistical estimator of the
signal, determining that the normalized mean temperature dispersion of $1526$
clusters is $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle = (1.64 \pm 0.48)
\times 10^{-11}$. However, comparison with analytic calculations and
simulations suggest that around $0.7\,\sigma$ of this result is due to cluster
lensing rather than the kSZ effect. By correcting this, the temperature
dispersion is measured to be $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle =
(1.35 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-11}$, which gives a detection at the $2.8\,\sigma$
level. We further convert uniform-weight temperature dispersion into a
measurement of the line-of-sight velocity dispersion, by using estimates of the
optical depth of each cluster (which introduces additional uncertainty into the
estimate). We find that the velocity dispersion is $\langle v^{2} \rangle
=(123\,000 \pm 71\,000)\,({\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1})^{2}$, which is consistent
with findings from other large-scale structure studies, and provides direct
evidence of statistical homogeneity on scales of $600\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. Our
study shows the promise of using cross-correlations of the kSZ effect with
large-scale structure in order to constrain the growth of structure.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.03143 [pdf] - 1630131
Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry with CMB polarization
Submitted: 2017-04-11, last modified: 2018-02-05
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies exhibit a
large-scale dipolar power asymmetry. To determine whether this is due to a
real, physical modulation or is simply a large statistical fluctuation requires
the measurement of new modes. Here we forecast how well CMB polarization data
from \Planck\ and future experiments will be able to confirm or constrain
physical models for modulation. Fitting several such models to the \Planck\
temperature data allows us to provide predictions for polarization asymmetry.
While for some models and parameters \Planck\ polarization will decrease error
bars on the modulation amplitude by only a small percentage, we show,
importantly, that cosmic-variance-limited (and in some cases even \Planck)
polarization data can decrease the errors by considerably better than the
expectation of $\sqrt 2$ based on simple $\ell$-space arguments. We project
that if the primordial fluctuations are truly modulated (with parameters as
indicated by \Planck\ temperature data) then \Planck\ will be able to make a
2$\sigma$ detection of the modulation model with 20--75\% probability,
increasing to 45--99\% when cosmic-variance-limited polarization is considered.
We stress that these results are quite model dependent. Cosmic variance in
temperature is important: combining statistically isotropic polarization with
temperature data will spuriously increase the significance of the temperature
signal with 30\% probability for \Planck.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.06387 [pdf] - 1630139
Constraints on direction-dependent cosmic birefringence from Planck
polarization data
Submitted: 2017-05-17, last modified: 2018-02-05
Cosmic birefringence is the process that rotates the plane of polarization by
an amount, $\alpha$, as photons propagate through free space. Such an effect
arises in parity-violating extensions to the electromagnetic sector, such as
the Chern-Simons term common in axion models, quintessence models, or
Lorentz-violating extensions to the standard model. Most studies consider the
monopole of this rotation, but it is also possible for the effect to have
spatial anisotropies. Paying particular attention to large scales, we implement
a novel pixel-based method to extract the spherical harmonics for $L \le 30$
and a pseudo-$C_L$ method for $L > 30$. Our results are consistent with no
detection and we set 95% upper limits on the amplitude of a scale-invariant
power spectrum of $L(L+1)C_L/2\pi < [2.2\, (\mathrm{stat.})\, \pm 0.7\,
(\mathrm{syst.})]\times10^{-5} = [0.07\, (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 0.02\,
(\mathrm{syst.})] \,\mathrm{deg}^2$, on par with previous constraints. This
implies specific limits on the dipole and quadrupole amplitudes to be
$\sqrt{C_1/4\pi} < 0.2^\circ$ and $\sqrt{C_2/4\pi} < 0.1^\circ$, at 95% CL,
respectively, improving previous constraints by an order of magnitude. We
further constrain a model independent $M=0$ quadrupole in an arbitrary
direction to be $\alpha_{20} = 0.02^\circ \pm 0.21^\circ$, with an
unconstrained direction. However, we find an excess of dipolar power with an
amplitude $\sqrt{3C_1/4\pi} = 0.32^\circ \pm 0.10^\circ\, (\mathrm{stat.})\,
\pm 0.08^\circ\, (\mathrm{syst.})$, in the direction $(l, b) = (295^\circ,
17^\circ) \pm (22^\circ, 17^\circ)\, (\mathrm{stat.})\, \pm (5^\circ,
16^\circ)\, (\mathrm{syst.})$, larger than 1.4% of simulations with no
birefringence. We attribute part of this signal to the contamination of
residual foregrounds not accounted for in our simulations, although this should
be further investigated.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.10134 [pdf] - 1644724
Closing in on the large-scale CMB power asymmetry
Submitted: 2017-09-28
Measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature
anisotropies have revealed a dipolar asymmetry in power at the largest scales,
in apparent contradiction with the statistical isotropy of standard
cosmological models. The significance of the effect is not very high, and is
dependent on a posteriori choices. Nevertheless, a number of models have been
proposed that produce a scale-dependent asymmetry. We confront several such
models for a physical, position-space modulation with CMB temperature
observations. We find that, while some models that maintain the standard
isotropic power spectrum are allowed, others, such as those with modulated
tensor or uncorrelated isocurvature modes, can be ruled out on the basis of the
overproduction of isotropic power. This remains the case even when an extra
isocurvature mode fully anti-correlated with the adiabatic perturbations is
added to suppress power on large scales.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.02114 [pdf] - 1579600
Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-07, last modified: 2017-09-14
We present the implications for cosmic inflation of the Planck measurements
of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies in both temperature and
polarization based on the full Planck survey. The Planck full mission
temperature data and a first release of polarization data on large angular
scales measure the spectral index of curvature perturbations to be
$n_\mathrm{s} = 0.968 \pm 0.006$ and tightly constrain its scale dependence to
$d n_s/d \ln k =-0.003 \pm 0.007$ when combined with the Planck lensing
likelihood. When the high-$\ell$ polarization data is included, the results are
consistent and uncertainties are reduced. The upper bound on the
tensor-to-scalar ratio is $r_{0.002} < 0.11$ (95% CL), consistent with the
B-mode polarization constraint $r< 0.12$ (95% CL) obtained from a joint
BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck analysis. These results imply that $V(\phi)
\propto \phi^2$ and natural inflation are now disfavoured compared to models
predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio, such as $R^2$ inflation. Three
independent methods reconstructing the primordial power spectrum are
investigated. The Planck data are consistent with adiabatic primordial
perturbations. We investigate inflationary models producing an anisotropic
modulation of the primordial curvature power spectrum as well as generalized
models of inflation not governed by a scalar field with a canonical kinetic
term. The 2015 results are consistent with the 2013 analysis based on the
nominal mission data.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.05764 [pdf] - 1935353
Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: effects of observer peculiar motion
Burigana, C.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Trombetti, T.;
Notari, A.;
Quartin, M.;
De Gasperis, G.;
Buzzelli, A.;
Vittorio, N.;
De Zotti, G.;
de Bernardis, P.;
Chluba, J.;
Bilicki, M.;
Danese, L.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Lapi, A.;
Negrello, M.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Scott, D.;
Contreras, D.;
Achucarro, A.;
Ade, P.;
Allison, R.;
Ashdown, M.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Banerji, R.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonato, M.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brinckmann, T.;
Bucher, M.;
Cabella, P.;
Cai, Z. -Y.;
Calvo, M.;
Castellano, G.;
Challinor, A.;
Clesse, S.;
Colantoni, I.;
Coppolecchia, A.;
Crook, M.;
D'Alessandro, G.;
Diego, J. -M.;
Di Marco, A.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Errard, J.;
Feeney, S.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Ferraro, S.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Galli, S.;
Genova-Santos, R.;
Gerbino, M.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Grandis, S.;
Greenslade, J.;
Hagstotz, S.;
Hanany, S.;
Handley, W.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Hervias-Caimapo, C.;
Hills, M.;
Hivon, E.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamagna, L.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Luzzi, G.;
Maffei, B.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Martins, C. J. A. P.;
Masi, S.;
McCarthy, D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Molinari, D.;
Monfardini, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Paiella, A.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Piat, M.;
Pisano, G.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Pollo, A.;
Poulin, V.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Roman, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. -A.;
Salvati, L.;
Tartari, A.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tramonte, D.;
Trappe, N.;
Tucker, C.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van de Weijgaert, R.;
van Tent, B.;
Vennin, V.;
Vielva, P.;
Young, K.;
Zannoni, M.
Submitted: 2017-04-19, last modified: 2017-08-30
We discuss the effects on the CMB, CIB, and thermal SZ effect due to the
peculiar motion of an observer with respect to the CMB rest frame, which
induces boosting effects. We investigate the scientific perspectives opened by
future CMB space missions, focussing on the CORE proposal. The improvements in
sensitivity offered by a mission like CORE, together with its high resolution
over a wide frequency range, will provide a more accurate estimate of the CMB
dipole. The extension of boosting effects to polarization and
cross-correlations will enable a more robust determination of purely
velocity-driven effects that are not degenerate with the intrinsic CMB dipole,
allowing us to achieve a S/N ratio of 13; this improves on the Planck detection
and essentially equals that of an ideal cosmic-variance-limited experiment up
to a multipole l of 2000. Precise inter-frequency calibration will offer the
opportunity to constrain or even detect CMB spectral distortions, particularly
from the cosmological reionization, because of the frequency dependence of the
dipole spectrum, without resorting to precise absolute calibration. The
expected improvement with respect to COBE-FIRAS in the recovery of distortion
parameters (in principle, a factor of several hundred for an ideal experiment
with the CORE configuration) ranges from a factor of several up to about 50,
depending on the quality of foreground removal and relative calibration. Even
for 1% accuracy in both foreground removal and relative calibration at an
angular scale of 1 deg, we find that dipole analyses for a mission like CORE
will be able to improve the recovery of the CIB spectrum amplitude by a factor
of 17 in comparison with current results based on FIRAS. In addition to the
scientific potential of a mission like CORE for these analyses, synergies with
other planned and ongoing projects are also discussed.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.04516 [pdf] - 1935364
Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Survey requirements and mission
design
Delabrouille, J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Achúcarro, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Allison, R.;
Arroja, F.;
Artal, E.;
Ashdown, M.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Banerji, R.;
Barbosa, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Baselmans, J. J. A.;
Basu, K.;
Battistelli, E. S.;
Battye, R.;
Baumann, D.;
Benoît, A.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bideaud, A.;
Biesiada, M.;
Bilicki, M.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonato, M.;
Borrill, J.;
Boulanger, F.;
Brinckmann, T.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Buzzelli, A.;
Cabass, G.;
Cai, Z. -Y.;
Calvo, M.;
Caputo, A.;
Carvalho, C. -S.;
Casas, F. J.;
Castellano, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Charles, I.;
Chluba, J.;
Clements, D. L.;
Clesse, S.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colantoni, I.;
Contreras, D.;
Coppolecchia, A.;
Crook, M.;
D'Alessandro, G.;
D'Amico, G.;
da Silva, A.;
de Avillez, M.;
de Gasperis, G.;
De Petris, M.;
de Zotti, G.;
Danese, L.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Desjacques, V.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doyle, S.;
Durrer, R.;
Dvorkin, C.;
Eriksen, H. -K.;
Errard, J.;
Feeney, S.;
Fernández-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Franceschet, C.;
Fuskeland, U.;
Galli, S.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gomez, A.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Grandis, S.;
Greenslade, J.;
Goupy, J.;
Hagstotz, S.;
Hanany, S.;
Handley, W.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Hervias-Caimapo, C.;
Hills, M.;
Hindmarsh, M.;
Hivon, E.;
Hoang, D. T.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Hu, B.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamagna, L.;
Lapi, A.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lizarraga, J.;
Luzzi, G.;
Macìas-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Martin, S.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Martins, C. J. A. P.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McCarthy, D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mennella, A.;
Mohr, J.;
Molinari, D.;
Monfardini, A.;
Montier, L.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Notari, A.;
Noviello, F.;
Oppizzi, F.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Pagano, L.;
Paiella, A.;
Pajer, E.;
Paoletti, D.;
Paradiso, S.;
Partridge, R. B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patil, S. P.;
Perdereau, O.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pisano, G.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Pollo, A.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Poulin, V.;
Prêle, D.;
Quartin, M.;
Ravenni, A.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ringeval, C.;
Roest, D.;
Roman, M.;
Roukema, B. F.;
Rubino-Martin, J. -A.;
Salvati, L.;
Scott, D.;
Serjeant, S.;
Signorelli, G.;
Starobinsky, A. A.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Tan, C. Y.;
Tartari, A.;
Tasinato, G.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torrado, J.;
Tramonte, D.;
Trappe, N.;
Triqueneaux, S.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tucker, C.;
Urrestilla, J.;
Väliviita, J.;
Van de Weygaert, R.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vennin, V.;
Verde, L.;
Vermeulen, G.;
Vielva, P.;
Vittorio, N.;
Voisin, F.;
Wallis, C.;
Wandelt, B.;
Wehus, I.;
Weller, J.;
Young, K.;
Zannoni, M.
Submitted: 2017-06-14
Future observations of cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarisation have
the potential to answer some of the most fundamental questions of modern
physics and cosmology. In this paper, we list the requirements for a future CMB
polarisation survey addressing these scientific objectives, and discuss the
design drivers of the CORE space mission proposed to ESA in answer to the "M5"
call for a medium-sized mission. The rationale and options, and the
methodologies used to assess the mission's performance, are of interest to
other future CMB mission design studies. CORE is designed as a near-ultimate
CMB polarisation mission which, for optimal complementarity with ground-based
observations, will perform the observations that are known to be essential to
CMB polarisation scienceand cannot be obtained by any other means than a
dedicated space mission.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.02618 [pdf] - 1551524
Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry: from temperature to k
space to lensing
Submitted: 2015-12-08, last modified: 2017-03-22
One of the most intriguing hints of a departure from the standard
cosmological model is a large-scale dipolar power asymmetry in the cosmic
microwave background (CMB). If not a statistical fluke, its origins must lie in
the modulation of the position-space fluctuations via a physical mechanism,
which requires the observation of new modes to confirm or refute. We introduce
an approach to describe such a modulation in k space and calculate its effects
on the CMB temperature and lensing. We fit the k-space modulation parameters to
Planck 2015 temperature data and show that CMB lensing will not provide us with
enough independent information to confirm or refute such a mechanism. However,
our approach elucidates some poorly understood aspects of the asymmetry, in
particular that it is weakly constrained. Also, it will be particularly useful
in predicting the effectiveness of polarization in testing a physical
modulation.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08633 [pdf] - 1530749
Planck intermediate results. XLIX. Parity-violation constraints from
polarization data
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-27, last modified: 2016-08-05
Parity violating extensions of the standard electromagnetic theory cause in
vacuo rotation of the plane of polarization of propagating photons. This
effect, also known as cosmic birefringence, impacts the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropy angular power spectra, producing non-vanishing
$T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ correlations that are otherwise null when parity is a
symmetry. Here we present new constraints on an isotropic rotation,
parametrized by the angle $\alpha$, derived from Planck 2015 CMB polarization
data. To increase the robustness of our analyses, we employ two complementary
approaches, in harmonic space and in map space, the latter based on a peak
stacking technique. The two approaches provide estimates for $\alpha$ that are
in agreement within statistical uncertainties and very stable against several
consistency tests. Considering the $T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ information jointly,
we find $\alpha = 0.31^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm
0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm syst.})$ from the harmonic analysis and $\alpha =
0.35^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm 0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm
syst.})$ from the stacking approach. These constraints are compatible with no
parity violation and are dominated by the systematic uncertainty in the
orientation of Planck's polarization-sensitive bolometers.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.03550 [pdf] - 1432973
The information content of cosmic microwave background anisotropies
Submitted: 2016-03-11, last modified: 2016-06-09
The cosmic microwave background (CMB) contains perturbations that are close
to Gaussian and isotropic. This means that its information content, in the
sense of the ability to constrain cosmological models, is closely related to
the number of modes probed in CMB power spectra. Rather than making forecasts
for specific experimental setups, here we take a more pedagogical approach and
ask how much information we can extract from the CMB if we are only limited by
sample variance. We show that, compared with temperature measurements, the
addition of E-mode polarization doubles the number of modes available out to a
fixed maximum multipole, provided that all of the TT, TE, and EE power spectra
are measured. However, the situation in terms of constraints on particular
parameters is more complicated, as we explain and illustrate graphically. We
also discuss the enhancements in information that can come from adding B-mode
polarization and gravitational lensing. We show how well one could ever
determine the basic cosmological parameters from CMB data compared with what
has been achieved with Planck, which has already probed a substantial fraction
of the TT information. Lastly, we look at constraints on neutrino mass as a
specific example of how lensing information improves future prospects beyond
the current 6-parameter model.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.07135 [pdf] - 1483209
Planck 2015 results. XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Aluri, P. K.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Pant, N.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-06-23, last modified: 2016-01-22
We test the statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropies using observations made by the Planck satellite.
Our results are based mainly on the full Planck mission for temperature, but
also include some polarization measurements.
In particular, we consider the CMB anisotropy maps derived from the
multi-frequency Planck data by several component-separation methods. For the
temperature anisotropies, we find excellent agreement between results based on
these sky maps over both a very large fraction of the sky and a broad range of
angular scales, establishing that potential foreground residuals do not affect
our studies.
Tests of skewness, kurtosis, multi-normality, N-point functions, and
Minkowski functionals indicate consistency with Gaussianity, while a power
deficit at large angular scales is manifested in several ways, for example low
map variance. The results of a peak statistics analysis are consistent with the
expectations of a Gaussian random field. The "Cold Spot" is detected with
several methods, including map kurtosis, peak statistics, and mean temperature
profile. We thoroughly probe the large-scale dipolar power asymmetry, detecting
it with several independent tests, and address the subject of a posteriori
correction. Tests of directionality suggest the presence of angular clustering
from large to small scales, but at a significance that is dependent on the
details of the approach. We perform the first examination of polarization data,
finding the morphology of stacked peaks to be consistent with the expectations
of statistically isotropic simulations. Where they overlap, these results are
consistent with the Planck 2013 analysis based on the nominal mission data and
provide our most thorough view of the statistics of the CMB fluctuations to
date.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.05158 [pdf] - 1330995
Searching for concentric low variance circles in the cosmic microwave
background
Submitted: 2015-08-20, last modified: 2015-11-20
In a recent paper, Gurzadyan & Penrose claim to have found directions in the
sky around which there are multiple concentric sets of annuli with anomalously
low variance in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). These features are
presented as evidence for a particular theory of the pre-Big Bang Universe. We
are able to reproduce the analysis these authors presented for data from the
WMAP satellite and we confirm the existence of these apparently special
directions in the newer Planck data. However, we also find that these features
are present at the same level of abundance in simulated Gaussian CMB skies,
i.e. they are entirely consistent with the predictions of the standard
cosmological model.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.0909 [pdf] - 890838
Radon backgrounds in the DEAP-1 liquid-argon-based Dark Matter detector
Amaudruz, P. -A.;
Batygov, M.;
Beltran, B.;
Boudjemline, K.;
Caldwell, M. G. Boulay B. Cai T.;
Chen, M.;
Chouinard, R.;
Cleveland, B. T.;
Contreras, D.;
Dering, K.;
Duncan, F.;
Ford, R.;
Giuliani, R. Gagnon F.;
Golovko, M. Gold V. V.;
Gorel, P.;
Graham, K.;
Grant, D. R.;
Hakobyan, R.;
Hallin, A. L.;
Harvey, P.;
Hearns, C.;
Jillings, C. J.;
Kuźniak, M.;
Lawson, I.;
Li, O.;
Lidgard, J.;
Liimatainen, P.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Mathew, R.;
McDonald, A. B.;
McElroy, T.;
McFarlane, K.;
McKinsey, D.;
Muir, A.;
Nantais, C.;
Nicolics, K.;
Nikkel, J.;
Noble, T.;
O'Dwyer, E.;
Olsen, K. S.;
Ouellet, C.;
Pasuthip, P.;
Pollmann, T.;
Rau, W.;
Retiere, F.;
Ronquest, M.;
Skensved, P.;
Sonley, T.;
Tang, J.;
Vázquez-Jáuregui, E.;
Veloce, L.;
Ward, M.
Submitted: 2012-11-05, last modified: 2014-04-23
The DEAP-1 \SI{7}{kg} single phase liquid argon scintillation detector was
operated underground at SNOLAB in order to test the techniques and measure the
backgrounds inherent to single phase detection, in support of the
\mbox{DEAP-3600} Dark Matter detector. Backgrounds in DEAP are controlled
through material selection, construction techniques, pulse shape discrimination
and event reconstruction. This report details the analysis of background events
observed in three iterations of the DEAP-1 detector, and the measures taken to
reduce them.
The $^{222}$Rn decay rate in the liquid argon was measured to be between 16
and \SI{26}{\micro\becquerel\per\kilogram}. We found that the background
spectrum near the region of interest for Dark Matter detection in the DEAP-1
detector can be described considering events from three sources: radon
daughters decaying on the surface of the active volume, the expected rate of
electromagnetic events misidentified as nuclear recoils due to inefficiencies
in the pulse shape discrimination, and leakage of events from outside the
fiducial volume due to imperfect position reconstruction. These backgrounds
statistically account for all observed events, and they will be strongly
reduced in the DEAP-3600 detector due to its higher light yield and simpler
geometry.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.7280 [pdf] - 657392
KAPAO: a MEMS-based natural guide star adaptive optics system
Severson, Scott A.;
Choi, Philip I.;
Contreras, Daniel S.;
Gilbreth, Blaine N.;
Littleton, Erik;
McGonigle, Lorcan P.;
Morrison, William A.;
Rudy, Alex R.;
Wong, Jonathan R.;
Xue, Andrew;
Spjut, Erik;
Baranec, Christoph;
Riddle, Reed
Submitted: 2013-04-26
We describe KAPAO, our project to develop and deploy a low-cost,
remote-access, natural guide star adaptive optics (AO) system for the Pomona
College Table Mountain Observatory (TMO) 1-meter telescope. We use a
commercially available 140-actuator BMC MEMS deformable mirror and a version of
the Robo-AO control software developed by Caltech and IUCAA. We have structured
our development around the rapid building and testing of a prototype system,
KAPAO-Alpha, while simultaneously designing our more capable final system,
KAPAO-Prime. The main differences between these systems are the prototype's
reliance on off-the-shelf optics and a single visible-light science camera
versus the final design's improved throughput and capabilities due to the use
of custom optics and dual-band, visible and near-infrared imaging. In this
paper, we present the instrument design and on-sky closed-loop testing of
KAPAO-Alpha as well as our plans for KAPAO-Prime. The primarily
undergraduate-education nature of our partner institutions, both public (Sonoma
State University) and private (Pomona and Harvey Mudd Colleges), has enabled us
to engage physics, astronomy, and engineering undergraduates in all phases of
this project. This material is based upon work supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant No. 0960343.