Normalized to: Consortium, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.07027 [pdf] - 1374092
Spitzer Parallax of OGLE-2015-BLG-0966: A Cold Neptune in the Galactic
Disk
Street, R. A.;
Udalski, A.;
Novati, S. Calchi;
Hundertmark, M. P. G.;
Zhu, W.;
Gould, A.;
Yee, J.;
Tsapras, Y.;
Bennett, D. P.;
Project, The RoboNet;
Consortium, MiNDSTEp;
Jorgensen, U. G.;
Dominik, M.;
Andersen, M. I.;
Bachelet, E.;
Bozza, V.;
Bramich, D. M.;
Burgdorf, M. J.;
Cassan, A.;
Ciceri, S.;
D'Ago, G.;
Dong, Subo;
Evans, D. F.;
Gu, Sheng-hong;
Harkonnen, H.;
Hinse, T. C.;
Horne, Keith;
Jaimes, R. Figuera;
Kains, N.;
Kerins, E.;
Korhonen, H.;
Kuffmeier, M.;
Mancini, L.;
Menzies, J.;
Mao, S.;
Peixinho, N.;
Popovas, A.;
Rabus, M.;
Rahvar, S.;
Ranc, C.;
Rasmussen, R. Tronsgaard;
Scarpetta, G.;
Schmidt, R.;
Skottfelt, J.;
Snodgrass, C.;
Southworth, J.;
Steele, I. A.;
Surdej, J.;
Unda-Sanzana, E.;
Verma, P.;
von Essen, C.;
Wambsganss, J.;
Wang, Yi-Bo.;
Wertz, O.;
Project, The OGLE;
Poleski, R.;
Pawlak, M.;
Szymanski, M. K.;
Skowron, J.;
Mroz, P.;
Kozlowski, S.;
Wyrzykowski, L.;
Pietrukowicz, P.;
Pietrzynski, G.;
Soszynski, I.;
Ulaczyk, K.;
Beichman, The Spitzer Team C.;
Bryden, G.;
Carey, S.;
Gaudi, B. S.;
Henderson, C.;
Pogge, R. W.;
Shvartzvald, Y.;
Collaboration, The MOA;
Abe, F.;
Asakura, Y.;
Bhattacharya, A.;
Bond, I. A.;
Donachie, M.;
Freeman, M.;
Fukui, A.;
Hirao, Y.;
Inayama, K.;
Itow, Y.;
Koshimoto, N.;
Li, M. C. A.;
Ling, C. H.;
Masuda, K.;
Matsubara, Y.;
Muraki, Y.;
Nagakane, M.;
Nishioka, T.;
Ohnishi, K.;
Oyokawa, H.;
Rattenbury, N.;
Saito, To.;
Sharan, A.;
Sullivan, D. J.;
Sumi, T.;
Suzuki, D.;
P.;
Tristram, J.;
Wakiyama, Y.;
Yonehara, A.;
Han, KMTNet Modeling Team C.;
Choi, J. -Y.;
Park, H.;
Jung, Y. K.;
Shin, I. -G.
Submitted: 2015-08-27
We report the detection of a Cold Neptune m_planet=21+/-2MEarth orbiting a
0.38MSol M dwarf lying 2.5-3.3 kpc toward the Galactic center as part of a
campaign combining ground-based and Spitzer observations to measure the
Galactic distribution of planets. This is the first time that the complex
real-time protocols described by Yee et al. (2015), which aim to maximize
planet sensitivity while maintaining sample integrity, have been carried out in
practice. Multiple survey and follow-up teams successfully combined their
efforts within the framework of these protocols to detect this planet. This is
the second planet in the Spitzer Galactic distribution sample. Both are in the
near-to-mid disk and clearly not in the Galactic bulge.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0572 [pdf] - 902887
Frequency of Solar-Like Systems and of Ice and Gas Giants Beyond the
Snow Line from High-Magnification Microlensing Events in 2005-2008
Gould, A.;
Dong, Subo;
Gaudi, B. S.;
Udalski, A.;
Bond, I. A.;
Greenhill, J.;
Street, R. A.;
Dominik, M.;
Sumi, T.;
Szymanski, M. K.;
Han, C.;
Collaboration, MicroFUN;
Collaboration, OGLE;
Collaboration, MOA;
Collabroation, PLANET;
Collaboration, RoboNet;
Consortium, MiNDSTEp
Submitted: 2010-01-05
We present the first measurement of planet frequency beyond the "snow line"
for planet/star mass-ratios[-4.5<log q<-2]: d^2 N/dlog q/dlog
s=(0.36+-0.15)/dex^2 at mean mass ratio q=5e-4, and consistent with being flat
in log projected separation, s. Our result is based on a sample of 6 planets
detected from intensive follow-up of high-mag (A>200) microlensing events
during 2005-8. The sample host stars have typical mass M_host 0.5 Msun, and
detection is sensitive to planets over a range of projected separations
(R_E/s_max,R_E*s_max), where R_E 3.5 AU sqrt(M_host/Msun) is the Einstein
radius and s_max (q/5e-5)^{2/3}, corresponding to deprojected separations ~3
times the "snow line". Though frenetic, the observations constitute a
"controlled experiment", which permits measurement of absolute planet
frequency. High-mag events are rare, but the high-mag channel is efficient:
half of high-mag events were successfully monitored and half of these yielded
planet detections. The planet frequency derived from microlensing is a factor 7
larger than from RV studies at factor ~25 smaller separations [2<P<2000 days].
However, this difference is basically consistent with the gradient derived from
RV studies (when extrapolated well beyond the separations from which it is
measured). This suggests a universal separation distribution across 2 dex in
semi-major axis, 2 dex in mass ratio, and 0.3 dex in host mass. Finally, if all
planetary systems were "analogs" of the Solar System, our sample would have
yielded 18.2 planets (11.4 "Jupiters", 6.4 "Saturns", 0.3 "Uranuses", 0.2
"Neptunes") including 6.1 systems with 2 or more planet detections. This
compares to 6 planets including one 2-planet system in the actual sample,
implying a first estimate of 1/6 for the frequency of solar-like systems.