Normalized to: Conradie, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.07087 [pdf] - 2034679
Measurement and analysis of nuclear $\gamma$-ray production cross
sections in proton interactions with Mg, Si and Fe nuclei abundant in
astrophysical sites over the incident energy range $E=30-66$ MeV
Yahia-Cherif, W.;
Ouichaoui, S.;
Kiener, J.;
Lawrie, E. A.;
Lawrie, J. J.;
Tatischeff, V.;
Belhout, A.;
Moussa, D.;
Papka, P.;
Benhabiles, H.;
Bucher, T. D.;
Chafa, A.;
Conradie, J. L.;
Damache, S.;
Debabi, M.;
Deloncle, I.;
Easton, J. L.;
Hamadache, C.;
Hammache, F.;
Jones, P.;
Kheswa, B. V.;
Khumalo, N. A.;
Lamula, T.;
Majola, S. N. T.;
Ndayishimye, J.;
Negi, D.;
Noncolela, S. P.;
de Séréville, N.;
Sharpey-Schafer, J. F.;
Shirinda, O.;
Wiedeking, M.;
Wyngaardt, S.
Submitted: 2020-01-20
Gamma-ray production cross section excitation functions have been measured
for $30$, $42$, $54$ and $66$ MeV proton beams accelerated onto targets of
astrophysical interest, $^{nat}$C, C + O (Mylar), $^{nat}$Mg, $^{nat}$Si and
$^{56}$Fe, at the Sector Separated Cyclotron (SSC) of iThemba LABS (near Cape
Town, South Africa). The AFRODITE array equipped with 8 Compton suppressed HPGe
clover detectors was used to record $\gamma$-ray data. For known, intense
$\gamma$-ray lines the previously reported experimental data measured up to
$E_{p}\simeq$ $25$ MeV at the Washington and Orsay tandem accelerators were
extended to higher proton energies. Our experimental data for the last 3
targets are reported here and discussed with respect to previous data and the
Murphy \textit{et al.} compilation [ApJS 183, 142 (2009)], as well as to
predictions of the nuclear reaction code TALYS. The overall agreement between
theory and experiment obtained in first-approach calculations using default
input parameters of TALYS has been appreciably improved by using modified
optical model potential (OMP), deformation, and level density parameters. The
OMP parameters have been extracted from theoretical fits to available
experimental elastic/inelastic nucleon scattering angular distribution data by
means of the coupled-channels reaction code OPTMAN. Experimental data for
several new $\gamma$-ray lines are also reported and discussed. The
astrophysical implications of our results are emphasised.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.01933 [pdf] - 1661346
Revival of the magnetar PSR J1622-4950: observations with MeerKAT,
Parkes, XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and NuSTAR
Camilo, F.;
Scholz, P.;
Serylak, M.;
Buchner, S.;
Merryfield, M.;
Kaspi, V. M.;
Archibald, R. F.;
Bailes, M.;
Jameson, A.;
van Straten, W.;
Sarkissian, J.;
Reynolds, J. E.;
Johnston, S.;
Hobbs, G.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Adam, R. M.;
Adams, G. B.;
Alberts, T.;
Andreas, R.;
Asad, K. M. B.;
Baker, D. E.;
Baloyi, T.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Baxana, T.;
Bennett, T. G. H.;
Bernardi, G.;
Booisen, D.;
Booth, R. S.;
Botha, D. H.;
Boyana, L.;
Brederode, L. R. S.;
Burger, J. P.;
Cheetham, T.;
Conradie, J.;
Conradie, J. P.;
Davidson, D. B.;
de Bruin, G.;
de Swardt, B.;
de Villiers, C.;
de Villiers, D. I. L.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
de Villiers, W.;
de Waal, C.;
Dikgale, M. A.;
Toit, G. du;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fanaroff, B.;
Fataar, S.;
Foley, A. R.;
Foster, G.;
Fourie, D.;
Gamatham, R.;
Gatsi, T.;
Geschke, R.;
Goedhart, S.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Hlakola, M. J.;
Hokwana, A.;
Hoorn, D. H.;
Horn, D.;
Horrell, J.;
Hugo, B.;
Isaacson, A.;
Jacobs, O.;
van Rensburg, J. P. Jansen;
Jonas, J. L.;
Jordaan, B.;
Joubert, A.;
Joubert, F.;
Jozsa, G. I. G.;
Julie, R.;
Julius, C. C.;
Kapp, F.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Karels, F.;
Kariseb, M.;
Karuppusamy, R.;
Kasper, V.;
Knox-Davies, E. C.;
Koch, D.;
Kotze, P. P. A.;
Krebs, A.;
Kriek, N.;
Kriel, H.;
Kusel, T.;
Lamoor, S.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Liebenberg, D.;
Liebenberg, I.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lunsky, B.;
Mabombo, N.;
Macdonald, T.;
Macfarlane, P.;
Madisa, K.;
Mafhungo, L.;
Magnus, L. G.;
Magozore, C.;
Mahgoub, O.;
Main, J. P. L.;
Makhathini, S.;
Malan, J. A.;
Malgas, P.;
Manley, J. R.;
Manzini, M.;
Marais, L.;
Marais, N.;
Marais, S. J.;
Maree, M.;
Martens, A.;
Matshawule, S. D.;
Matthysen, N.;
Mauch, T.;
Nally, L. D. Mc;
Merry, B.;
Millenaar, R. P.;
Mjikelo, C.;
Mkhabela, N.;
Mnyandu, N.;
Moeng, I. T.;
Mokone, O. J.;
Monama, T. E.;
Montshiwa, K.;
Moss, V.;
Mphego, M.;
New, W.;
Ngcebetsha, B.;
Ngoasheng, K.;
Niehaus, H.;
Ntuli, P.;
Nzama, A.;
Obies, F.;
Obrocka, M.;
Ockards, M. T.;
Olyn, C.;
Oozeer, N.;
Otto, A. J.;
Padayachee, Y.;
Passmoor, S.;
Patel, A. A.;
Paula, S.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Pholoholo, B.;
Prozesky, P.;
Rakoma, S.;
Ramaila, A. J. T.;
Rammala, I.;
Ramudzuli, Z. R.;
Rasivhaga, M.;
Ratcliffe, S.;
Reader, H. C.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L.;
Robyntjies, A.;
Rosekrans, D.;
Rust, A.;
Salie, S.;
Sambu, N.;
Schollar, C. T. G.;
Schwardt, L.;
Seranyane, S.;
Sethosa, G.;
Sharpe, C.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sirothia, S. K.;
Slabber, M. J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Smith, S.;
Sofeya, L.;
Songqumase, N.;
Spann, R.;
Stappers, B.;
Steyn, D.;
Steyn, T. J.;
Strong, R.;
Struthers, A.;
Stuart, C.;
Sunnylall, P.;
Swart, P. S.;
Taljaard, B.;
Tasse, C.;
Taylor, G.;
Theron, I. P.;
Thondikulam, V.;
Thorat, K.;
Tiplady, A.;
Toruvanda, O.;
van Aardt, J.;
van Balla, T.;
Heever, L. van den;
van der Byl, A.;
van der Merwe, C.;
van der Merwe, P.;
van Niekerk, P. C.;
van Rooyen, R.;
van Staden, J. P.;
van Tonder, V.;
van Wyk, R.;
Wait, I.;
Walker, A. L.;
Wallace, B.;
Welz, M.;
Williams, L. P.;
Xaia, B.;
Young, N.;
Zitha, S.
Submitted: 2018-04-05
New radio (MeerKAT and Parkes) and X-ray (XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and
NuSTAR) observations of PSR J1622-4950 indicate that the magnetar, in a
quiescent state since at least early 2015, reactivated between 2017 March 19
and April 5. The radio flux density, while variable, is approximately 100x
larger than during its dormant state. The X-ray flux one month after
reactivation was at least 800x larger than during quiescence, and has been
decaying exponentially on a 111+/-19 day timescale. This high-flux state,
together with a radio-derived rotational ephemeris, enabled for the first time
the detection of X-ray pulsations for this magnetar. At 5%, the 0.3-6 keV
pulsed fraction is comparable to the smallest observed for magnetars. The
overall pulsar geometry inferred from polarized radio emission appears to be
broadly consistent with that determined 6-8 years earlier. However, rotating
vector model fits suggest that we are now seeing radio emission from a
different location in the magnetosphere than previously. This indicates a novel
way in which radio emission from magnetars can differ from that of ordinary
pulsars. The torque on the neutron star is varying rapidly and unsteadily, as
is common for magnetars following outburst, having changed by a factor of 7
within six months of reactivation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.01933 [pdf] - 1661346
Revival of the magnetar PSR J1622-4950: observations with MeerKAT,
Parkes, XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and NuSTAR
Camilo, F.;
Scholz, P.;
Serylak, M.;
Buchner, S.;
Merryfield, M.;
Kaspi, V. M.;
Archibald, R. F.;
Bailes, M.;
Jameson, A.;
van Straten, W.;
Sarkissian, J.;
Reynolds, J. E.;
Johnston, S.;
Hobbs, G.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Adam, R. M.;
Adams, G. B.;
Alberts, T.;
Andreas, R.;
Asad, K. M. B.;
Baker, D. E.;
Baloyi, T.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Baxana, T.;
Bennett, T. G. H.;
Bernardi, G.;
Booisen, D.;
Booth, R. S.;
Botha, D. H.;
Boyana, L.;
Brederode, L. R. S.;
Burger, J. P.;
Cheetham, T.;
Conradie, J.;
Conradie, J. P.;
Davidson, D. B.;
de Bruin, G.;
de Swardt, B.;
de Villiers, C.;
de Villiers, D. I. L.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
de Villiers, W.;
de Waal, C.;
Dikgale, M. A.;
Toit, G. du;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fanaroff, B.;
Fataar, S.;
Foley, A. R.;
Foster, G.;
Fourie, D.;
Gamatham, R.;
Gatsi, T.;
Geschke, R.;
Goedhart, S.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Hlakola, M. J.;
Hokwana, A.;
Hoorn, D. H.;
Horn, D.;
Horrell, J.;
Hugo, B.;
Isaacson, A.;
Jacobs, O.;
van Rensburg, J. P. Jansen;
Jonas, J. L.;
Jordaan, B.;
Joubert, A.;
Joubert, F.;
Jozsa, G. I. G.;
Julie, R.;
Julius, C. C.;
Kapp, F.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Karels, F.;
Kariseb, M.;
Karuppusamy, R.;
Kasper, V.;
Knox-Davies, E. C.;
Koch, D.;
Kotze, P. P. A.;
Krebs, A.;
Kriek, N.;
Kriel, H.;
Kusel, T.;
Lamoor, S.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Liebenberg, D.;
Liebenberg, I.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lunsky, B.;
Mabombo, N.;
Macdonald, T.;
Macfarlane, P.;
Madisa, K.;
Mafhungo, L.;
Magnus, L. G.;
Magozore, C.;
Mahgoub, O.;
Main, J. P. L.;
Makhathini, S.;
Malan, J. A.;
Malgas, P.;
Manley, J. R.;
Manzini, M.;
Marais, L.;
Marais, N.;
Marais, S. J.;
Maree, M.;
Martens, A.;
Matshawule, S. D.;
Matthysen, N.;
Mauch, T.;
Nally, L. D. Mc;
Merry, B.;
Millenaar, R. P.;
Mjikelo, C.;
Mkhabela, N.;
Mnyandu, N.;
Moeng, I. T.;
Mokone, O. J.;
Monama, T. E.;
Montshiwa, K.;
Moss, V.;
Mphego, M.;
New, W.;
Ngcebetsha, B.;
Ngoasheng, K.;
Niehaus, H.;
Ntuli, P.;
Nzama, A.;
Obies, F.;
Obrocka, M.;
Ockards, M. T.;
Olyn, C.;
Oozeer, N.;
Otto, A. J.;
Padayachee, Y.;
Passmoor, S.;
Patel, A. A.;
Paula, S.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Pholoholo, B.;
Prozesky, P.;
Rakoma, S.;
Ramaila, A. J. T.;
Rammala, I.;
Ramudzuli, Z. R.;
Rasivhaga, M.;
Ratcliffe, S.;
Reader, H. C.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L.;
Robyntjies, A.;
Rosekrans, D.;
Rust, A.;
Salie, S.;
Sambu, N.;
Schollar, C. T. G.;
Schwardt, L.;
Seranyane, S.;
Sethosa, G.;
Sharpe, C.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sirothia, S. K.;
Slabber, M. J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Smith, S.;
Sofeya, L.;
Songqumase, N.;
Spann, R.;
Stappers, B.;
Steyn, D.;
Steyn, T. J.;
Strong, R.;
Struthers, A.;
Stuart, C.;
Sunnylall, P.;
Swart, P. S.;
Taljaard, B.;
Tasse, C.;
Taylor, G.;
Theron, I. P.;
Thondikulam, V.;
Thorat, K.;
Tiplady, A.;
Toruvanda, O.;
van Aardt, J.;
van Balla, T.;
Heever, L. van den;
van der Byl, A.;
van der Merwe, C.;
van der Merwe, P.;
van Niekerk, P. C.;
van Rooyen, R.;
van Staden, J. P.;
van Tonder, V.;
van Wyk, R.;
Wait, I.;
Walker, A. L.;
Wallace, B.;
Welz, M.;
Williams, L. P.;
Xaia, B.;
Young, N.;
Zitha, S.
Submitted: 2018-04-05
New radio (MeerKAT and Parkes) and X-ray (XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and
NuSTAR) observations of PSR J1622-4950 indicate that the magnetar, in a
quiescent state since at least early 2015, reactivated between 2017 March 19
and April 5. The radio flux density, while variable, is approximately 100x
larger than during its dormant state. The X-ray flux one month after
reactivation was at least 800x larger than during quiescence, and has been
decaying exponentially on a 111+/-19 day timescale. This high-flux state,
together with a radio-derived rotational ephemeris, enabled for the first time
the detection of X-ray pulsations for this magnetar. At 5%, the 0.3-6 keV
pulsed fraction is comparable to the smallest observed for magnetars. The
overall pulsar geometry inferred from polarized radio emission appears to be
broadly consistent with that determined 6-8 years earlier. However, rotating
vector model fits suggest that we are now seeing radio emission from a
different location in the magnetosphere than previously. This indicates a novel
way in which radio emission from magnetars can differ from that of ordinary
pulsars. The torque on the neutron star is varying rapidly and unsteadily, as
is common for magnetars following outburst, having changed by a factor of 7
within six months of reactivation.