Normalized to: Connaughton, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.05546 [pdf] - 2132012
International Coordination of Multi-Messenger Transient Observations in
the 2020s and Beyond: Kavli-IAU White Paper
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Whitelock, Patricia A.;
Cadonati, Laura;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Davies, Roger;
Fender, Rob;
Groot, Paul J.;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Murphy, Tara;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Sesana, Alberto;
Yoshida, Shigeru;
Zhang, Binbin
Submitted: 2020-07-10
This White Paper summarizes the discussions from a five-day workshop,
involving 50 people from 18 countries, held in Cape Town, South Africa in
February 2020. Convened by the International Astronomical Union's Executive
Committee Working Group on Global Coordination of Ground and Space Astrophysics
and sponsored by the Kavli Foundation, we discussed existing and potential
bottlenecks for transient and multi-messenger astronomy, identifying eight
broad areas of concern. Some of these are very similar to the challenges faced
by many astronomers engaging in international collaboration, for example, data
access policies, funding, theoretical and computational resources and workforce
equity. Others, including, alerts, telescope coordination and
target-of-opportunity implementation, are strongly linked to the time domain
and are particularly challenging as we respond to transients. To address these
bottlenecks we offer thirty-five specific recommendations, some of which are
simply starting points and require development. These recommendations are not
only aimed at collaborative groups and individuals, but also at the various
organizations who are essential to making transient collaborations efficient
and effective: including the International Astronomical Union, observatories,
projects, scientific journals and funding agencies. We hope those involved in
transient research will find them constructive and use them to develop
collaborations with greater impact and more inclusive teams.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.06818 [pdf] - 1912849
A Search for High-Energy Counterparts to Fast Radio Bursts
Cunningham, Virginia;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Burns, Eric;
Goldstein, Adam;
Lien, Amy;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Briggs, Michael;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Miller, M. Coleman;
Racusin, Judith;
Stanbro, Matthew
Submitted: 2019-05-16
We report on a search for high-energy counterparts to fast radio bursts
(FRBs) with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), Fermi Large Area Telescope
(LAT), and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). We
find no significant associations for any of the 23 FRBs in our sample, but
report upper limits to the high-energy fluence for each on timescales of 0.1,
1, 10, and 100 s. We report lower limits on the ratio of the radio to
high-energy fluence, $\frac{f_{r}}{f_{\gamma}}$, for timescales of 0.1 and 100
s. We discuss the implications of our non-detections on various proposed
progenitor models for FRBs, including analogs of giant pulses from the Crab
pulsar and hyperflares from magnetars. This work demonstrates the utility of
analyses of high-energy data for FRBs in tracking down the nature of these
elusive sources.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.02557 [pdf] - 1730302
First observations of speed of light tracks by a fluorescence detector
looking down on the atmosphere
Abdellaoui, G.;
Abe, S.;
Adams, J. H.;
Ahriche, A.;
Allard, D.;
Allen, L.;
Alonso, G.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Anzalone, A.;
Arai, Y.;
Asano, K.;
Attallah, R.;
Attoui, H.;
Pernas, M. Ave;
Bacholle, S.;
Bakiri, M.;
Baragatti, P.;
Barrillon, P.;
Bartocci, S.;
Bayer, J.;
Beldjilali, B.;
Belenguer, T.;
Belkhalfa, N.;
Bellotti, R.;
Belov, A.;
Belov, K.;
Benmessai, K.;
Bertaina, M.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Biktemerova, S.;
Bisconti, F.;
Blanc, N.;
Błȩcki, J.;
Blin-Bondil, S.;
Bobik, P.;
Bogomilov, M.;
Bozzo, E.;
Bruno, A.;
Caballero, K. S.;
Cafagna, F.;
Campana, D.;
Capdevielle, J-N.;
Capel, F.;
Caramete, A.;
Caramete, L.;
Carlson, P.;
Caruso, R.;
Casolino, M.;
Cassardo, C.;
Castellina, A.;
Catalano, C. Catalano O.;
Cellino, A.;
Chikawa, M.;
Chiritoi, G.;
Christl, M. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Conti, L.;
Cordero, G.;
Cotto, G.;
Crawford, H. J.;
Cremonini, R.;
Csorna, S.;
Cummings, A.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
De Donato, C.;
de la Taille, C.;
De Santis, C.;
del Peral, L.;
Di Martino, M.;
Damian, A. Diaz;
Djemil, T.;
Dutan, I.;
Ebersoldt, A.;
Ebisuzaki, T.;
Engel, R.;
Eser, J.;
Fenu, F.;
Fernández-González, S.;
Fernández-Soriano, J.;
Ferrarese, S.;
Flamini, M.;
Fornaro, C.;
Fouka, M.;
Franceschi, A.;
Franchini, S.;
Fuglesang, C.;
Fujii, T.;
Fujimoto, J.;
Fukushima, M.;
Galeotti, P.;
García-Ortega, E.;
Garipov, G.;
Gascón, E.;
Genci, J.;
Giraudo, G.;
Alvarado, C. González;
Gorodetzky, P.;
Greg, R.;
Guarino, F.;
Guzmán, A.;
Hachisu, Y.;
Haiduc, M.;
Harlov, B.;
Haungs, A.;
Carretero, J. Hernández;
Cruz, W. Hidber;
Ikeda, D.;
Inoue, N.;
Inoue, S.;
Isgrò, F.;
Itow, Y.;
Jammer, T.;
Jeong, S.;
Joven, E.;
Judd, E. G.;
Jung, A.;
Jochum, J.;
Kajino, F.;
Kajino, T.;
Kalli, S.;
Kaneko, I.;
Karadzhov, Y.;
Karczmarczyk, J.;
Katahira, K.;
Kawai, K.;
Kawasaki, Y.;
Kedadra, A.;
Khales, H.;
Khrenov, B. A.;
Kim, Jeong-Sook;
Kim, Soon-Wook;
Kleifges, M.;
Klimov, P. A.;
Kolev, D.;
Krantz, H.;
Kreykenbohm, I.;
Kudela, K.;
Kurihara, Y.;
Kusenko, A.;
Kuznetsov, E.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lachaud, C.;
Lahmar, H.;
Lakhdari, F.;
Larson, R.;
Larsson, O.;
Lee, J.;
Licandro, J.;
Campano, L. López;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Mackovjak, S.;
Mahdi, M.;
Maravilla, D.;
Marcelli, L.;
Marcos, J. L.;
Marini, A.;
Marszał, W.;
Martens, K.;
Martín, Y.;
Martinez, O.;
Martucci, M.;
Masciantonio, G.;
Mase, K.;
Mastafa, M.;
Matev, R.;
Matthews, J. N.;
Mebarki, N.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mendoza, M. A.;
Menshikov, A.;
Merino, A.;
Meseguer, J.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mimouni, J.;
Miyamoto, H.;
Mizumoto, Y.;
Monaco, A.;
Ríos, J. A. Morales de los;
Nagataki, C. Moretto S.;
Naitamor, S.;
Napolitano, T.;
Naslund, W.;
Nava, R.;
Neronov, A.;
Nomoto, K.;
Nonaka, T.;
Ogawa, T.;
Ogio, S.;
Ohmori, H.;
Olinto, A. V.;
Orleański, P.;
Osteria, G.;
Pagliaro, A.;
Painter, W.;
Panasyuk, M. I.;
Panico, B.;
Pasqualino, G.;
Parizot, E.;
Park, I. H.;
Pastircak, B.;
Patzak, T.;
Paul, T.;
Pérez-Grande, I.;
Perfetto, F.;
Peter, T.;
Picozza, P.;
Pindado, S.;
Piotrowski, L. W.;
Piraino, S.;
Placidi, L.;
Plebaniak, Z.;
Pliego, S.;
Pollini, A.;
Polonski, Z.;
Popescu, E. M.;
Prat, P.;
Prévôt, G.;
Prieto, H.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Putis, M.;
Rabanal, J.;
Radu, A. A.;
Reyes, M.;
Rezazadeh, M.;
Ricci, M.;
Frías, M. D. Rodríguez;
Rodencal, M.;
Ronga, F.;
Roudil, G.;
Rusinov, I.;
Rybczyński, M.;
Sabau, M. D.;
Cano, G. Sáez;
Sagawa, H.;
Sahnoune, Z.;
Saito, A.;
Sakaki, N.;
Salazar, H.;
Balanzar, J. C. Sanchez;
Sánchez, J. L.;
Santangelo, A.;
Sanz-Andrés, A.;
Palomino, M. Sanz;
Saprykin, O.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sato, M.;
Schanz, T.;
Schieler, H.;
Scotti, V.;
Selmane, S.;
Semikoz, D.;
Serra, M.;
Sharakin, S.;
Shimizu, H. M.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shirahama, T.;
Spataro, B.;
Stan, I.;
Sugiyama, T.;
Supanitsky, D.;
Suzuki, M.;
Szabelska, B.;
Szabelski, J.;
Tajima, N.;
Tajima, T.;
Takahashi, Y.;
Takami, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Takizawa, Y.;
Talai, M. C.;
Tenzer, C.;
Thomas, S. B.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tkachev, L.;
Tokuno, H.;
Tomida, T.;
Tone, N.;
Toscano, S.;
Traïche, M.;
Tsenov, R.;
Tsunesada, Y.;
Tsuno, K.;
Tubbs, J.;
Turriziani, S.;
Uchihori, Y.;
Vaduvescu, O.;
Valdés-Galicia, J. F.;
Vallania, P.;
Vankova, G.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Vlcek, B.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Vrabel, M.;
Wada, S.;
Watanabe, J.;
Watts, J.;
Weber, M.;
Muñoz, R. Weigand;
Weindl, A.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wille, M.;
Wilms, J.;
Włodarczyk, Z.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yang, J.;
Yano, H.;
Yashin, I. V.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Young, R.;
Zgura, I. S;
Zotov, M. Yu.;
Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Submitted: 2018-08-07
EUSO-Balloon is a pathfinder mission for the Extreme Universe Space
Observatory onboard the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM-EUSO). It was launched
on the moonless night of the 25$^{th}$ of August 2014 from Timmins, Canada. The
flight ended successfully after maintaining the target altitude of 38 km for
five hours. One part of the mission was a 2.5 hour underflight using a
helicopter equipped with three UV light sources (LED, xenon flasher and laser)
to perform an inflight calibration and examine the detectors capability to
measure tracks moving at the speed of light. We describe the helicopter laser
system and details of the underflight as well as how the laser tracks were
recorded and found in the data. These are the first recorded laser tracks
measured from a fluorescence detector looking down on the atmosphere. Finally,
we present a first reconstruction of the direction of the laser tracks relative
to the detector.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.02866 [pdf] - 1740032
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a
Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Burns, E.;
Veres, P.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
McEnery, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Hui, C. M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mailyan, B.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Siellez, K.;
Stanbro, M.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2018-07-08, last modified: 2018-08-06
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star
merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as
GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the
closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of
a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent
two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A.
While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short
gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is
not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis
version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest
short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally
undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify
nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding
the search for kilonovae.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.02378 [pdf] - 1727875
Analysis of Sub-threshold Short Gamma-ray Bursts in Fermi GBM Data
Kocevski, D.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Briggs, M. S.;
Blackburn, L.;
Veres, P.;
Hui, C. M.;
Hamburg, R.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Littenberg, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.
Submitted: 2018-06-06, last modified: 2018-08-05
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is currently the most prolific
detector of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). Recently the detection rate of short GRBs
(SGRBs) has been dramatically increased through the use of ground-based
searches that analyze GBM continuous time tagged event (CTTE) data. Here we
examine the efficiency of a method developed to search CTTE data for
sub-threshold transient events in temporal coincidence with LIGO/Virgo compact
binary coalescence triggers. This targeted search operates by coherently
combining data from all 14 GBM detectors by taking into account the complex
spatial and energy dependent response of each detector. We use the method to
examine a sample of SGRBs that were independently detected by the Burst Alert
Telescope on board the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, but which were too
intrinsically weak or viewed with unfavorable instrument geometry to initiate
an on-board trigger of GBM. We find that the search can successfully recover a
majority of the BAT detected sample in the CTTE data. We show that the targeted
search of CTTE data will be crucial in increasing the GBM sensitivity, and
hence the gamma-ray horizon, to weak events such as GRB 170817A. We also
examine the properties of the GBM signal possibly associated with the LIGO
detection of GW150914 and show that it is consistent with the observed
properties of other sub-threshold SGRBs in our sample. We find that the
targeted search is capable of recovering true astrophysical signals as weak as
the signal associated with GW150914 in the untriggered data.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.04638 [pdf] - 1697940
The THESEUS space mission concept: science case, design and expected
performances
Amati, L.;
O'Brien, P.;
Goetz, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Tenzer, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Labanti, C.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Stratta, G.;
Tanvir, N.;
Willingale, R.;
Attina, P.;
Campana, R.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Contini, C.;
Fuschino, F.;
Gomboc, A.;
Hudec, R.;
Orleanski, P.;
Renotte, E.;
Rodic, T.;
Bagoly, Z.;
Blain, A.;
Callanan, P.;
Covino, S.;
Ferrara, A.;
Floch, E. Le;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Rosati, P.;
Vacchi, A.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Giommi, P.;
Gomboc, A.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Piro, L.;
Reglero, V.;
Rossi, A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Vergani, S.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Briggs, M.;
Campolongo, E.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cordier, B.;
Morelli, B.;
Orlandini, M.;
Adami, C.;
Argan, A.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balazs, L.;
Baldazzi, G.;
Basa, S.;
Basak, R.;
Bellutti, P.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bertuccio, G.;
Braga, J.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brandt, S.;
Brocato, E.;
Budtz-Jorgensen, C.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Burderi, L.;
Camp, J.;
Capozziello, S.;
Caruana, J.;
Casella, P.;
Cenko, B.;
Chardonnet, P.;
Ciardi, B.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Dainotti, M. G.;
D'Elia, V.;
De Martino, D.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Della Valle, M.;
Drago, A.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Feroci, M.;
Finelli, F.;
Fiorini, M.;
Fynbo, J.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Gendre, B.;
Ghisellini, G.;
Grado, A.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Hafizi, M.;
Hanlon, L.;
Hjorth, J.;
Izzo, L.;
Kiss, L.;
Kumar, P.;
Kuvvetli, I.;
Lavagna, M.;
Li, T.;
Longo, F.;
Lyutikov, M.;
Maio, U.;
Maiorano, E.;
Malcovati, P.;
Malesani, D.;
Margutti, R.;
Martin-Carrillo, A.;
Masetti, N.;
McBreen, S.;
Mignani, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mundell, C.;
Nargaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Nicastro, L.;
Palazzi, E.;
Paltani, S.;
Panessa, F.;
Pareschi, G.;
Pe'er, A.;
Penacchioni, A. V.;
Pian, E.;
Piedipalumbo, E.;
Piran, T.;
Rauw, G.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, A.;
Rezzolla, L.;
Romano, P.;
Ruffini, R.;
Savaglio, S.;
Sguera, V.;
Schady, P.;
Skidmore, W.;
Song, L.;
Stanway, E.;
Starling, R.;
Topinka, M.;
Troja, E.;
van Putten, M.;
Vanzella, E.;
Vercellone, S.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Zampa, G.;
Zampa, N.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, B. B.;
Zhang, S.;
Zhang, S. -N.;
Antonelli, A.;
Bianco, F.;
Boci, S.;
Boer, M.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Boulade, O.;
Butler, C.;
Campana, S.;
Capitanio, F.;
Celotti, A.;
Chen, Y.;
Colpi, M.;
Comastri, A.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Dadina, M.;
De Luca, A.;
Dong, Y. -W.;
Ettori, S.;
Gandhi, P.;
Geza, E.;
Greiner, J.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harms, J.;
Hernanz, M.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hutchinson, I.;
Israel, G.;
Jonker, P.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Kawai, N.;
Wiersema, K.;
Korpela, S.;
Lebrun, V.;
Lu, F.;
MacFadyen, A.;
Malaguti, G.;
Maraschi, L.;
Melandri, A.;
Modjaz, M.;
Morris, D.;
Omodei, N.;
Paizis, A.;
Pata, P.;
Petrosian, V.;
Rachevski, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Ryde, F.;
Sabau-Graziati, L.;
Shigehiro, N.;
Sims, M.;
Soomin, J.;
Szecsi, D.;
Urata, Y.;
Uslenghi, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vianello, G.;
Vojtech, S.;
Watson, D.;
Zicha, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-12, last modified: 2018-03-27
THESEUS is a space mission concept aimed at exploiting Gamma-Ray Bursts for
investigating the early Universe and at providing a substantial advancement of
multi-messenger and time-domain astrophysics. These goals will be achieved
through a unique combination of instruments allowing GRB and X-ray transient
detection over a broad field of view (more than 1sr) with 0.5-1 arcmin
localization, an energy band extending from several MeV down to 0.3 keV and
high sensitivity to transient sources in the soft X-ray domain, as well as
on-board prompt (few minutes) follow-up with a 0.7 m class IR telescope with
both imaging and spectroscopic capabilities. THESEUS will be perfectly suited
for addressing the main open issues in cosmology such as, e.g., star formation
rate and metallicity evolution of the inter-stellar and intra-galactic medium
up to redshift $\sim$10, signatures of Pop III stars, sources and physics of
re-ionization, and the faint end of the galaxy luminosity function. In
addition, it will provide unprecedented capability to monitor the X-ray
variable sky, thus detecting, localizing, and identifying the electromagnetic
counterparts to sources of gravitational radiation, which may be routinely
detected in the late '20s / early '30s by next generation facilities like
aLIGO/ aVirgo, eLISA, KAGRA, and Einstein Telescope. THESEUS will also provide
powerful synergies with the next generation of multi-wavelength observatories
(e.g., LSST, ELT, SKA, CTA, ATHENA).
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.07328 [pdf] - 1638848
Gamma-ray burst models in light of the GRB 170817A - GW170817 connection
Veres, P.;
Mészáros, P.;
Goldstein, A.;
Fraija, N.;
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Preece, R. D.;
Hamburg, R.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kocevski, D.
Submitted: 2018-02-20
For the first time, a short gamma-ray burst (GRB) was unambiguously
associated with a gravitational wave (GW) observation from a binary neutron
star (NS) merger. This allows us to link the details of the central engine
properties to GRB emission models. We find that photospheric models (both
dissipative and non-dissipative variants) have difficulties accounting for the
observations. Internal shocks give the most natural account of the observed
peak energy, viewing angle and total energy. We also show that a simple
external shock model can reproduce the observed GRB pulse with parameters
consistent with those derived from the afterglow modeling. We find a simple
cocoon shock breakout model is in mild tension with the observed spectral
evolution, however it cannot be excluded based on gamma-ray data alone. Future
joint observations of brighter GRBs will pose even tighter constraints on
prompt emission models.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07997 [pdf] - 1838112
Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Consortium, The Cherenkov Telescope Array;
:;
Acharya, B. S.;
Agudo, I.;
Samarai, I. Al;
Alfaro, R.;
Alfaro, J.;
Alispach, C.;
Batista, R. Alves;
Amans, J. -P.;
Amato, E.;
Ambrosi, G.;
Antolini, E.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Aramo, C.;
Araya, M.;
Armstrong, T.;
Arqueros, F.;
Arrabito, L.;
Asano, K.;
Ashley, M.;
Backes, M.;
Balazs, C.;
Balbo, M.;
Ballester, O.;
Ballet, J.;
Bamba, A.;
Barkov, M.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
Bastieri, D.;
Becherini, Y.;
Belfiore, A.;
Benbow, W.;
Berge, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bernardos, M.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Bertucci, B.;
Biasuzzi, B.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Biteau, J.;
Blanch, O.;
Blazek, J.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonanno, G.;
Bonardi, A.;
Bonavolontà, C.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bosnjak, Z.;
Böttcher, M.;
Braiding, C.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brill, A.;
Brown, A. M.;
Brun, P.;
Brunetti, G.;
Buanes, T.;
Buckley, J.;
Bugaev, V.;
Bühler, R.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Burton, M.;
Burtovoi, A.;
Busetto, G.;
Canestrari, R.;
Capalbi, M.;
Capitanio, F.;
Caproni, A.;
Caraveo, P.;
Cárdenas, V.;
Carlile, C.;
Carosi, R.;
Carquín, E.;
Carr, J.;
Casanova, S.;
Cascone, E.;
Catalani, F.;
Catalano, O.;
Cauz, D.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chadwick, P.;
Chaty, S.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Chen, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chernyakova, M.;
Chikawa, M.;
Christov, A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Cieślar, M.;
Coco, V.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colin, P.;
Conforti, V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Costa, A.;
Costantini, H.;
Cotter, G.;
Covino, S.;
Crocker, R.;
Cuadra, J.;
Cuevas, O.;
Cumani, P.;
D'Aì, A.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Urso, D.;
Daniel, M.;
Davids, I.;
Dawson, B.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
Anjos, R. de Cássia dos;
De Cesare, G.;
De Franco, A.;
Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal;
de la Calle, I.;
Lopez, R. de los Reyes;
De Lotto, B.;
De Luca, A.;
De Lucia, M.;
de Naurois, M.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Oña;
De Palma, F.;
De Persio, F.;
de Souza, V.;
Deil, C.;
Del Santo, M.;
Delgado, C.;
della Volpe, D.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Díaz, C.;
Dib, C.;
Diebold, S.;
Djannati-Ataï, A.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Drass, H.;
Dravins, D.;
Dubus, G.;
Dwarkadas, V. V.;
Ebr, J.;
Eckner, C.;
Egberts, K.;
Einecke, S.;
Ekoume, T. R. N.;
Elsässer, D.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Espinoza, C.;
Evoli, C.;
Fairbairn, M.;
Falceta-Goncalves, D.;
Falcone, A.;
Farnier, C.;
Fasola, G.;
Fedorova, E.;
Fegan, S.;
Fernandez-Alonso, M.;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Ferrand, G.;
Fesquet, M.;
Filipovic, M.;
Fioretti, V.;
Fontaine, G.;
Fornasa, M.;
Fortson, L.;
Coromina, L. Freixas;
Fruck, C.;
Fujita, Y.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Füßling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gadola, A.;
Gallant, Y.;
Garcia, B.;
López, R. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gaskins, J.;
Gasparetto, T.;
Gaug, M.;
Gerard, L.;
Giavitto, G.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Giordano, F.;
Giro, E.;
Giroletti, M.;
Giuliani, A.;
Glicenstein, J. -F.;
Gnatyk, R.;
Godinovic, N.;
Goldoni, P.;
Gómez-Vargas, G.;
González, M. M.;
González, J. M.;
Götz, D.;
Graham, J.;
Grandi, P.;
Granot, J.;
Green, A. J.;
Greenshaw, T.;
Griffiths, S.;
Gunji, S.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hara, S.;
Hardcastle, M. J.;
Hassan, T.;
Hayashi, K.;
Hayashida, M.;
Heller, M.;
Helo, J. C.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J.;
Hnatyk, B.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holder, J.;
Horan, D.;
Hörandel, J.;
Horns, D.;
Horvath, P.;
Hovatta, T.;
Hrabovsky, M.;
Hrupec, D.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Hütten, M.;
Iarlori, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inome, Y.;
Inoue, S.;
Inoue, T.;
Inoue, Y.;
Iocco, F.;
Ioka, K.;
Iori, M.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Janecek, P.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jean, P.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Jurysek, J.;
Kaaret, P.;
Karkar, S.;
Katagiri, H.;
Katz, U.;
Kawanaka, N.;
Kazanas, D.;
Khélifi, B.;
Kieda, D. B.;
Kimeswenger, S.;
Kimura, S.;
Kisaka, S.;
Knapp, J.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Koch, B.;
Kohri, K.;
Komin, N.;
Kosack, K.;
Kraus, M.;
Krause, M.;
Krauß, F.;
Kubo, H.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kuroda, H.;
Kushida, J.;
La Palombara, N.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lang, R. G.;
Lapington, J.;
Blanc, O. Le;
Leach, S.;
Lees, J. -P.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Lico, R.;
Limon, M.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
Lu, C. -C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Luque-Escamilla, P. L.;
Lyard, E.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Maier, G.;
Majumdar, P.;
Malaguti, G.;
Mandat, D.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mangano, S.;
Marcowith, A.;
Marín, J.;
Markoff, S.;
Martí, J.;
Martin, P.;
Martínez, M.;
Martínez, G.;
Masetti, N.;
Masuda, S.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Mazin, D.;
Medina, C.;
Melandri, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Meyer, M.;
Minaya, I. A.;
Mirabal, N.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Mitchell, A.;
Mizuno, T.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohammed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende-Parrilla, D.;
Mori, K.;
Morlino, G.;
Morris, P.;
Morselli, A.;
Moulin, E.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Mundell, C.;
Murach, T.;
Muraishi, H.;
Murase, K.;
Nagai, A.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nagayoshi, T.;
Naito, T.;
Nakamori, T.;
Nakamura, Y.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nieto, D.;
Nikołajuk, M.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nosek, D.;
Novosyadlyj, B.;
Nozaki, S.;
O'Brien, P.;
Oakes, L.;
Ohira, Y.;
Ohishi, M.;
Ohm, S.;
Okazaki, N.;
Okumura, A.;
Ong, R. A.;
Orienti, M.;
Orito, R.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Otte, N.;
Oya, I.;
Padovani, M.;
Paizis, A.;
Palatiello, M.;
Palatka, M.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pareschi, G.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Pech, M.;
Pedaletti, G.;
Perri, M.;
Persic, M.;
Petrashyk, A.;
Petrucci, P.;
Petruk, O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Pfeifer, M.;
Piano, G.;
Pisarski, A.;
Pita, S.;
Pohl, M.;
Polo, M.;
Pozo, D.;
Prandini, E.;
Prast, J.;
Principe, G.;
Prokhorov, D.;
Prokoph, H.;
Prouza, M.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Pürckhauer, S.;
Queiroz, F.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rainò, S.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, O.;
Reimer, A.;
Reisenegger, A.;
Renaud, M.;
Rezaeian, A. H.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribeiro, D.;
Ribó, M.;
Richtler, T.;
Rico, J.;
Rieger, F.;
Riquelme, M.;
Rivoire, S.;
Rizi, V.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez;
Rojas, G.;
Romano, P.;
Romeo, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Rulten, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Safi-Harb, S.;
Saito, T.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sakurai, S.;
Salina, G.;
Sánchez-Conde, M.;
Sandaker, H.;
Sandoval, A.;
Sangiorgi, P.;
Sanguillon, M.;
Sano, H.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Saturni, F. G.;
Schioppa, E. J.;
Schlenstedt, S.;
Schneider, M.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovanek, P.;
Schulz, A.;
Schussler, F.;
Schwanke, U.;
Sciacca, E.;
Scuderi, S.;
Seitenzahl, I.;
Semikoz, D.;
Sergijenko, O.;
Servillat, M.;
Shalchi, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sidoli, L.;
Siejkowski, H.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Sironi, G.;
Sitarek, J.;
Sliusar, V.;
Slowikowska, A.;
Sol, H.;
Stamerra, A.;
Stanič, S.;
Starling, R.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Stefanik, S.;
Stephan, M.;
Stolarczyk, T.;
Stratta, G.;
Straumann, U.;
Suomijarvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tajima, H.;
Tavani, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Tayabaly, K.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terada, Y.;
Terrier, R.;
Terzic, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Testa, V.;
Thoudam, S.;
Tian, W.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tokanai, F.;
Tomastik, J.;
Tonev, D.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Tosti, G.;
Tothill, N.;
Tovmassian, G.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trichard, C.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Pujadas, I. Troyano;
Tsujimoto, S.;
Umana, G.;
Vagelli, V.;
Vagnetti, F.;
Valentino, M.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Vassiliev, V.;
Acosta, M. Vázquez;
Vecchi, M.;
Vega, A.;
Vercellone, S.;
Veres, P.;
Vergani, S.;
Verzi, V.;
Vettolani, G. P.;
Viana, A.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villanueva, J.;
Voelk, H.;
Vollhardt, A.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vrastil, M.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, R.;
Walter, R.;
Ward, J. E.;
Warren, D.;
Watson, J. J.;
Werner, F.;
White, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Wilcox, P.;
Will, M.;
Williams, D. A.;
Wischnewski, R.;
Wood, M.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamazaki, R.;
Yanagita, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yoshiike, S.;
Yoshikoshi, T.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Zampieri, L.;
Zandanel, F.;
Zanin, R.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H.;
Zhdanov, V. I.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.
Submitted: 2017-09-22, last modified: 2018-01-21
The Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA, will be the major global observatory for
very high energy gamma-ray astronomy over the next decade and beyond. The
scientific potential of CTA is extremely broad: from understanding the role of
relativistic cosmic particles to the search for dark matter. CTA is an explorer
of the extreme universe, probing environments from the immediate neighbourhood
of black holes to cosmic voids on the largest scales. Covering a huge range in
photon energy from 20 GeV to 300 TeV, CTA will improve on all aspects of
performance with respect to current instruments.
The observatory will operate arrays on sites in both hemispheres to provide
full sky coverage and will hence maximize the potential for the rarest
phenomena such as very nearby supernovae, gamma-ray bursts or gravitational
wave transients. With 99 telescopes on the southern site and 19 telescopes on
the northern site, flexible operation will be possible, with sub-arrays
available for specific tasks. CTA will have important synergies with many of
the new generation of major astronomical and astroparticle observatories.
Multi-wavelength and multi-messenger approaches combining CTA data with those
from other instruments will lead to a deeper understanding of the broad-band
non-thermal properties of target sources.
The CTA Observatory will be operated as an open, proposal-driven observatory,
with all data available on a public archive after a pre-defined proprietary
period. Scientists from institutions worldwide have combined together to form
the CTA Consortium. This Consortium has prepared a proposal for a Core
Programme of highly motivated observations. The programme, encompassing
approximately 40% of the available observing time over the first ten years of
CTA operation, is made up of individual Key Science Projects (KSPs), which are
presented in this document.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02305 [pdf] - 1630338
On the interpretation of the Fermi GBM transient observed in coincidence
with LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Kocevski, D.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2018-01-07
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s
after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible
association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by
Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914
and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an alternative technique for fitting
background-limited data in the low-count regime, and call into question the
spectral analysis and the significance of the detection of GW150914-GBM
presented in Connaughton et al. (2016). The spectral analysis of Connaughton et
al. (2016) is not subject to the limitations of the low-count regime noted by
Greiner et al. (2016). We find Greiner et al. (2016) used an inconsistent
source position and did not follow the steps taken in Connaughton et al. (2016)
to mitigate the statistical shortcomings of their software when analyzing this
weak event. We use the approach of Greiner et al. (2016) to verify that our
original spectral analysis is not biased.
The detection significance of GW150914-GBM is established empirically, with a
False Alarm Rate (FAR) of $\sim 10^{-4}$~Hz. A post-trials False Alarm
Probability (FAP) of $2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ ($2.9 \sigma$) of this transient
being associated with GW150914 is based on the proximity in time to the GW
event of a transient with that FAR. The FAR and the FAP are unaffected by the
spectral analysis that is the focus of Greiner et al. (2016).
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05446 [pdf] - 1589764
An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications:
Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A
Goldstein, A.;
Veres, P.;
Burns, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Preece, R. D.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hui, C. M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Christensen, N.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Siellez, K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Broida, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
McEnery, J.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Stanbro, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately
1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated
with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of
gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical
source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We
report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which
extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary
compact mergers.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.09292 [pdf] - 1587689
BurstCube: A CubeSat for Gravitational Wave Counterparts
Racusin, Judith;
Perkins, Jeremy S.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
de Nolfo, Georgia;
Krizmanic, John;
Caputo, Regina;
McEnery, Julie E.;
Shawhan, Peter;
Morris, David;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Kocevski, Dan;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen;
Hui, Michelle;
Mitchell, Lee;
McBreen, Sheila
Submitted: 2017-08-28
BurstCube will detect long GRBs, attributed to the collapse of massive stars,
short GRBs (sGRBs), resulting from binary neutron star mergers, as well as
other gamma-ray transients in the energy range 10-1000 keV. sGRBs are of
particular interest because they are predicted to be the counterparts of
gravitational wave (GW) sources soon to be detectable by LIGO/Virgo. BurstCube
contains 4 CsI scintillators coupled with arrays of compact low-power Silicon
photomultipliers (SiPMs) on a 6U Dellingr bus, a flagship modular platform that
is easily modifiable for a variety of 6U CubeSat architectures. BurstCube will
complement existing facilities such as Swift and Fermi in the short term, and
provide a means for GRB detection, localization, and characterization in the
interim time before the next generation future gamma-ray mission flies, as well
as space-qualify SiPMs and test technologies for future use on larger gamma-ray
missions. The ultimate configuration of BurstCube is to have a set of $\sim10$
BurstCubes to provide all-sky coverage to GRBs for substantially lower cost
than a full-scale mission.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.00045 [pdf] - 1584119
iPTF17cw: An engine-driven supernova candidate discovered independent of
a gamma-ray trigger
Corsi, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Quimby, R.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Frail, D. A.;
Goldstein, A. M.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Connaughton, V.;
Perley, D. A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Copperwheat, C. M.;
Fremling, C.;
Kupfer, T.;
Piascik, A. S.;
Steele, I. A.;
Taddia, F.;
Vedantham, H.;
Kutyrev, A.;
Palliyaguru, N. T.;
Roberts, O.;
Sollerman, J.;
Troja, E.;
Veilleux, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-31
We present the discovery, classification, and radio-to-X-ray follow-up
observations of iPTF17cw, a broad-lined (BL) type Ic supernova (SN) discovered
by the intermediate Palomar Transient Factory (iPTF). Although unrelated to the
gravitational wave trigger, this SN was discovered as a happy by-product of the
extensive observational campaign dedicated to the follow-up of Advanced LIGO
event GW170104. The spectroscopic properties and inferred peak bolometric
luminosity of iPTF17cw are most similar to the gamma-ray burst (GRB) associated
SN 1998bw, while the shape of the r-band light curve is most similar to that of
the relativistic SN 2009bb. Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) observations
of the iPTF17cw field reveal a radio counterpart about 10 times less luminous
than SN 1998bw, and with peak radio luminosity comparable to that of SN
2006aj/GRB 060218 and SN 2010bh/GRB 100316D. Our radio observations of iPTF17cw
imply a relativistically expanding outflow. However, further late-time
observations with the VLA in its most extended configuration are needed to
confirm fading of iPTF radio counterpart at all frequencies. X-ray observations
carried out with Chandra reveal the presence of an X-ray counterpart with
luminosity similar to that of SN 2010bh/GRB 100316D. Searching the Fermi
catalog for possible gamma-rays reveals that GRB 161228B is spatially and
temporally compatible with iPTF17cw. The similarity to SN 1998bw and SN 2009bb,
the radio and X-ray detections, and the potential association with GRB 161228B,
all point to iPTF17cw being a new candidate member of the rare sample of
optically-discovered engine-driven BL-Ic SNe associated with relativistic
ejecta.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02395 [pdf] - 1529667
Updates to the Fermi-GBM Short GRB Targeted Offline Search in
Preparation for LIGO's Second Observing Run
Submitted: 2016-12-07
We detail the improvements made to the targeted offline search of Fermi-GBM
data for coincident signals to LIGO gravitational wave triggers. Description of
the changes are included, as well as comparisons between the ranking statistics
and False Alarm Rate distributions for the search during LIGO O1 and O2.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.02616 [pdf] - 1470748
Gravitational wave observations may constrain gamma-ray burst models:
the case of GW 150914 - GBM
Submitted: 2016-07-09, last modified: 2016-08-06
The possible short gamma-ray burst (GRB) observed by {\it Fermi}/GBM in
coincidence with the first gravitational wave (GW) detection, offers new ways
to test GRB prompt emission models. Gravitational wave observations provide
previously unaccessible physical parameters for the black hole central engine
such as its horizon radius and rotation parameter. Using a minimum jet
launching radius from the Advanced LIGO measurement of GW~150914, we calculate
photospheric and internal shock models and find that they are marginally
inconsistent with the GBM data, but cannot be definitely ruled out. Dissipative
photosphere models, however have no problem explaining the observations. Based
on the peak energy and the observed flux, we find that the external shock model
gives a natural explanation, suggesting a low interstellar density ($\sim
10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$) and a high Lorentz factor ($\sim 2000$). We only speculate
on the exact nature of the system producing the gamma-rays, and study the
parameter space of a generic Blandford Znajek model. If future joint
observations confirm the GW-short GRB association we can provide similar but
more detailed tests for prompt emission models.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04901 [pdf] - 1530839
Searching the Gamma-ray Sky for Counterparts to Gravitational Wave
Sources: Fermi GBM and LAT Observations of LVT151012 and GW151226
Racusin, J. L.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Jenke, P.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Broida, J.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Littenberg, T.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Stanbro, M.;
Veres, P.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Ackermann, M.;
Albert, A.;
Atwood, W. B.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bloom, E. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buson, S.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caragiulo, M.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Charles, E.;
Chiang, J.;
Ciprini, S.;
Costanza, F.;
Cuoco, A.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Palma, F.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Drell, P. S.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Focke, W. B.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giroletti, M.;
Glanzman, T.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grove, J. E.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harding, A. K.;
Jogler, T.;
Johannesson, G.;
Kamae, T.;
Kensei, S.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Li, J.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Pivato, G.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Raino, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Scargle, J. D.;
Sgro, C.;
Simone, D.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Spada, F.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
Vianello, G.;
Wood, K. S.;
Wood, M.
Submitted: 2016-06-15
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope
(LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and
candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected
by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT
data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated
pipelines and new techniques for char- acterizing the upper limits across a
large area of the sky. Due to the partial GBM and LAT coverage of the large
LIGO localization regions at the trigger times for both events, dif- ferences
in source distances and masses, as well as the uncertain degree to which
emission from these sources could be beamed, these non-detections cannot be
used to constrain the variety of theoretical models recently applied to explain
the candidate GBM counterpart to GW150914.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03920 [pdf] - 1439752
Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Blackburn, L.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Camp, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Hui, C. M.;
Jenke, P.;
Littenberg, T.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Racusin, J.;
Shawhan, P.;
Singer, L.;
Veitch, J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Giles, M. M.;
Gibby, M. H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
Mailyan, B.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
Sparke, L.;
Stanbro, M.;
Toelge, K.;
Veres, P.
Submitted: 2016-02-11, last modified: 2016-06-01
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst
Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic
counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of
the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914
reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event,
with a false alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9$\sigma$). This weak transient
lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear
connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or
magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent
with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient
event are consistent with a weak short Gamma-Ray Burst arriving at a large
angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing, where the GBM detector
response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, this
electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is
unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1~keV and
10~MeV of $1.8^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Future joint
observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the
weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance
coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary
mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01264 [pdf] - 1447654
Investigation of Primordial Black Hole Bursts using Interplanetary
Network Gamma-ray Bursts
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Hurley, K.;
MacGibbon, J. H;
Svinkin, D. S;
Aptekar, R. L;
Golenetskii, S. V;
Frederiks, D. D;
Pal'shin, V. D;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Kozyrev, A. S;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohmori, N.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A;
McTiernan, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-03, last modified: 2016-04-27
The detection of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in the solar neighborhood would have
very important implications for GRB phenomenology. The leading theories for
cosmological GRBs would not be able to explain such events. The final bursts of
evaporating Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), however, would be a natural
explanation for local GRBs. We present a novel technique that can constrain the
distance to gamma-ray bursts using detections from widely separated,
non-imaging spacecraft. This method can determine the actual distance to the
burst if it is local. We applied this method to constrain distances to a sample
of 36 short duration GRBs detected by the Interplanetary Network (IPN) that
show observational properties that are expected from PBH evaporations. These
bursts have minimum possible distances in the 10^13-10^18 cm (7-10^5 AU) range,
consistent with the expected PBH energetics and with a possible origin in the
solar neighborhood, although none of the bursts can be unambiguously
demonstrated to be local. Assuming these bursts are real PBH events, we
estimate lower limits on the PBH burst evaporation rate in the solar
neighborhood.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00911 [pdf] - 1443799
$Fermi$ GBM Observations of V404 Cyg During its 2015 Outburst
Submitted: 2016-01-05, last modified: 2016-04-15
V404 Cygni was discovered in 1989 by the $Ginga$ X-ray satellite during its
only previously observed X-ray outburst and soon after confirmed as a black
hole binary. On June 15, 2015, the Gamma Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) triggered on a
new outburst of V404 Cygni. We present 13 days of GBM observations of this
outburst including Earth occultation flux measurements, spectral and temporal
analysis. The Earth occultation fluxes reached 30 Crab with detected emission
to 100 keV and determined, via hardness ratios, that the source was in a hard
state. At high luminosity, spectral analysis between 8 and 300 keV showed that
the electron temperature decreased with increasing luminosity. This is expected
if the protons and electrons are in thermal equilibrium during an outburst with
the electrons cooled by the Compton scattering of softer seed photons from the
disk. However, the implied seed photon temperatures are unusually high,
suggesting a contribution from another source, such as the jet. No evidence of
state transitions is seen during this time period. The temporal analysis
reveals power spectra that can be modeled with two or three strong, broad
Lorentzians, similar to the power spectra of black hole binaries in their hard
state.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.09697 [pdf] - 1457213
The Fermi-GBM 3-year X-ray Burst Catalog
Submitted: 2016-03-31, last modified: 2016-04-01
The Fermi Gamma Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an all sky gamma-ray monitor well
known in the gamma-ray burst community. Although GBM excels in detecting the
hard, bright extragalactic GRBs, its sensitivity above 8 keV and all-sky view
make it an excellent instrument for the detection of rare, short-lived Galactic
transients. In March 2010, we initiated a systematic search for transients
using GBM data. We conclude this phase of the search by presenting a 3 year
catalog of 1084 X-ray bursts. Using spectral analysis, location and spatial
distributions we classified the 1084 events into 752 thermonuclear X-ray
bursts, 267 transient events from accretion flares and X-ray pulses, and 65
untriggered gamma-ray bursts. All thermonuclear bursts have peak blackbody
temperatures broadly consistent with photospheric radius expanison (PRE)
bursts. We find an average rate of 1.4 PRE bursts per day, integrated over all
Galactic bursters within about 10 kpc. These include 33 and 10 bursts from the
ultra-compact X-ray binaries 4U~0614+09 and 2S~0918-549, respectively. We
discuss these recurrence times and estimate the total mass ejected by PRE
bursts in our Galaxy.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.05206 [pdf] - 1385453
The Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst time-resolved spectral catalog: brightest
bursts in the first four years
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Preece, Robert D.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Cleveland, William H.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Goldstein, Adam;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Rau, Arne;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Veres, Péter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen;
Zhang, Bin-Bin;
van Eerten, Hendrik J.
Submitted: 2016-01-20
We aim to obtain high-quality time-resolved spectral fits of gamma-ray bursts
(GRBs) observed by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope. We perform time-resolved spectral analysis with high
temporal and spectral resolution of the brightest bursts observed by Fermi GBM
in its first 4 years of mission. We present the complete catalog containing
1,491 spectra from 81 bursts with high spectral and temporal resolution.
Distributions of parameters, statistics of the parameter populations,
parameter-parameter and parameter-uncertainty correlations, and their exact
values are obtained and presented as main results in this catalog. We report a
criterion that is robust enough to automatically distinguish between different
spectral evolutionary trends between bursts. We also search for plausible
blackbody emission components and find that only 3 bursts (36 spectra in total)
show evidence of a pure Planck function. It is observed that the averaged
time-resolved low-energy power-law index and peak energy are slightly harder
than the time-integrated values. Time-resolved spectroscopic results should be
used when interpreting physics from the observed spectra, instead of the
time-integrated results.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04464 [pdf] - 1359064
Estimating Long GRB Jet Opening Angles and Rest-Frame Energetics
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We present a method to estimate the jet opening angles of long duration
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) using the prompt gamma-ray energetics and an inversion
of the Ghirlanda relation, which is a correlation between the time-integrated
peak energy of the GRB prompt spectrum and the collimation-corrected energy in
gamma rays. The derived jet opening angles using this method and detailed
assumptions match well with the corresponding inferred jet opening angles
obtained when a break in the afterglow is observed. Furthermore, using a model
of the predicted long GRB redshift probability distribution observable by the
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), we estimate the probability distributions
for the jet opening angle and rest-frame energetics for a large sample of GBM
GRBs for which the redshifts have not been observed. Previous studies have only
used a handful of GRBs to estimate these properties due to the paucity of
observed afterglow jet breaks, spectroscopic redshifts, and comprehensive
prompt gamma-ray observations, and we potentially expand the number of GRBs
that can be used in this analysis by more than an order of magnitude. In this
analysis, we also present an inferred distribution of jet breaks which
indicates that a large fraction of jet breaks are not observable with current
instrumentation and observing strategies. We present simple parameterizations
for the jet angle, energetics, and jet break distributions so that they may be
used in future studies.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.00923 [pdf] - 1359020
Do the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and Swift Burst Alert Telescope see
the Same Short Gamma-Ray Bursts?
Submitted: 2015-12-02
Compact binary system mergers are expected to generate gravitational
radiation detectable by ground-based interferometers. A subset of these, the
merger of a neutron star with another neutron star or a black hole, are also
the most popular model for the production of short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The
Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
trigger on short GRBs (SGRBs) at rates that reflect their relative sky
exposures, with the BAT detecting 10 per year compared to about 45 for GBM. We
examine the SGRB populations detected by Swift BAT and Fermi GBM. We find that
the Swift BAT triggers on weaker SGRBs than Fermi GBM, providing they occur
close to the center of the BAT field-of-view, and that the Fermi GBM SGRB
detection threshold remains flatter across its field-of-view. Overall, these
effects combine to give the instruments the same average sensitivity, and
account for the SGRBs that trigger one instrument but not the other. We do not
find any evidence that the BAT and GBM are detecting significantly different
populations of SGRBs. Both instruments can detect untriggered SGRBs using
ground searches seeded with time and position. The detection of SGRBs below the
on-board triggering sensitivities of Swift BAT and Fermi GBM increases the
possibility of detecting and localizing the electromagnetic counterparts of
gravitational wave events seen by the new generation of gravitational wave
detectors.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07807 [pdf] - 1579741
The optical identifcation of events with poorly defined locations: The
case of the Fermi GBM GRB140801A
Lipunov, V. M.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Pruzhinskaya, M. V.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Pelassa, V.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Sokolov, I. V.;
Kann, D. A.;
Xu, Dong;
Gorbovskoy, E. S.;
Krushinski, V. V.;
Kornilov, V. G.;
Balanutsa, P. V.;
Boronina, S. V.;
Budnev, N. M.;
Cano, Z.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chazov, V. V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Delvaux, C.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Fynbo, J. F. U.;
Gabovich, A. V.;
Goldstein, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Gress, O. A.;
Ivanov, K. I.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Klose, S.;
Knust, F.;
Komarova, V. N.;
Konstantinov, E.;
Krylov, A. V.;
Kuvshinov, D. A.;
Kuznetsov, A. S.;
Lipunova, G. V.;
Moskvitin, A. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Poleshchuk, V. A.;
Schmidl, S.;
Sergienko, Yu. P.;
Sinyakov, E. V.;
Schulze, S.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Sokolova, T. N.;
Sparre, M.;
Thone, C. C.;
Tlatov, A. G.;
Tyurina, N. V.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Yazev, S. A.;
Yurkov, V. V.
Submitted: 2015-10-27
We report the early discovery of the optical afterglow of gamma-ray burst
(GRB) 140801A in the 137 deg$^2$ 3-$\sigma$ error-box of the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM). MASTER is the only observatory that automatically react to
all Fermi alerts. GRB 140801A is one of the few GRBs whose optical counterpart
was discovered solely from its GBM localization. The optical afterglow of GRB
140801A was found by MASTER Global Robotic Net 53 sec after receiving the
alert, making it the fastest optical detection of a GRB from a GBM error-box.
Spectroscopy obtained with the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the 6-m BTA
of SAO RAS reveals a redshift of $z=1.32$. We performed optical and
near-infrared photometry of GRB 140801A using different telescopes with
apertures ranging from 0.4-m to 10.4-m. GRB 140801A is a typical burst in many
ways. The rest-frame bolometric isotropic energy release and peak energy of the
burst is $E_\mathrm{iso} = 5.54_{-0.24}^{+0.26} \times 10^{52}$ erg and
$E_\mathrm{p, rest}\simeq280$ keV, respectively, which is consistent with the
Amati relation. The absence of a jet break in the optical light curve provides
a lower limit on the half-opening angle of the jet $\theta=6.1$ deg. The
observed $E_\mathrm{peak}$ is consistent with the limit derived from the
Ghirlanda relation. The joint Fermi GBM and Konus-Wind analysis shows that GRB
140801A could belong to the class of intermediate duration. The rapid detection
of the optical counterpart of GRB 140801A is especially important regarding the
upcoming experiments with large coordinate error-box areas.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.01143 [pdf] - 1938098
Construction of a Schwarzschild-Couder telescope as a candidate for the
Cherenkov Telescope Array: status of the optical system
Rousselle, J.;
Byrum, K.;
Cameron, R.;
Connaughton, V.;
Errando, M.;
Guarino, V.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Jenke, P.;
Kieda, D.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Nieto, D.;
Okumura, A.;
Petrashyk, A;
Vassiliev, V.
Submitted: 2015-09-03
We present the design and the status of procurement of the optical system of
the prototype Schwarzschild-Couder telescope (pSCT), for which construction is
scheduled to begin in fall at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory in southern
Arizona, USA. The Schwarzschild-Couder telescope is a candidate for the
medium-sized telescopes of the Cherenkov Telescope Array, which utilizes
imaging atmospheric Cherenkov techniques to observe gamma rays in the energy
range of 60Gev-60TeV. The pSCT novel aplanatic optical system is made of two
segmented aspheric mirrors. The primary mirror has 48 mirror panels with an
aperture of 9.6 m, while the secondary, made of 24 panels, has an diameter of
5.4 m. The resulting point spread function (PSF) is required to be better than
4 arcmin within a field of view of 6.4 degrees (80% of the field of view),
which corresponds to a physical size of 6.4 mm on the focal plane. This goal
represents a challenge for the inexpensive fabrication of aspheric mirror
panels and for the precise alignment of the optical system as well as for the
rigidity of the optical support structure. In this submission we introduce the
design of the Schwarzschild-Couder optical system and describe the solutions
adopted for the manufacturing of the mirror panels and their integration with
the optical support structure.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.00495 [pdf] - 1128973
The Needle in the 100 deg2 Haystack: Uncovering Afterglows of Fermi GRBs
with the Palomar Transient Factory
Singer, Leo P.;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Perley, Daniel A.;
Anderson, Gemma E.;
Anupama, G. C.;
Arcavi, Iair;
Bhalerao, Varun;
Bue, Brian D.;
Cao, Yi;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Corsi, Alessandra;
Cucchiara, Antonino;
Fender, Rob P.;
Fox, Derek B.;
Gehrels, Neil;
Goldstein, Adam;
Gorosabel, J.;
Horesh, Assaf;
Hurley, Kevin;
Johansson, Joel;
Kann, D. A.;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Huang, Kuiyun;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Masci, Frank;
Nugent, Peter;
Rau, Arne;
Rebbapragada, Umaa D.;
Staley, Tim D.;
Svinkin, Dmitry;
Thöne, C. C.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Urata, Yuji;
Weinstein, Alan
Submitted: 2015-01-02, last modified: 2015-06-09
The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has greatly expanded the number and
energy window of observations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). However, the coarse
localizations of tens to a hundred square degrees provided by the Fermi GRB
Monitor instrument have posed a formidable obstacle to locating the bursts'
host galaxies, measuring their redshifts, and tracking their panchromatic
afterglows. We have built a target-of-opportunity mode for the intermediate
Palomar Transient Factory in order to perform targeted searches for Fermi
afterglows. Here, we present the results of one year of this program: 8
afterglow discoveries out of 35 searches. Two of the bursts with detected
afterglows (GRBs 130702A and 140606B) were at low redshift (z=0.145 and 0.384
respectively) and had spectroscopically confirmed broad-line Type Ic
supernovae. We present our broadband follow-up including spectroscopy as well
as X-ray, UV, optical, millimeter, and radio observations. We study possible
selection effects in the context of the total Fermi and Swift GRB samples. We
identify one new outlier on the Amati relation. We find that two bursts are
consistent with a mildly relativistic shock breaking out from the progenitor
star, rather than the ultra-relativistic internal shock mechanism that powers
standard cosmological bursts. Finally, in the context of the Zwicky Transient
Facility, we discuss how we will continue to expand this effort to find optical
counterparts of binary neutron star mergers that may soon be detected by
Advanced LIGO and Virgo.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.02628 [pdf] - 1126366
Planned search for LIGO-GBM coincidence in the first advanced LIGO data
run
Submitted: 2015-06-08
In the fall of 2015 the first scientific observing run (O1) of the advanced
LIGO detectors will be conducted. Based on the recent commissioning progress at
the LIGO Hanford and Livingston sites, the gravitational wave detector range
for a neutron star binary inspiral is expected to be of order 60 Mpc. We
describe here our planning for an O1 search for coincidence between a LIGO
gravitational wave detection and a gamma-ray signal from the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor. Such a coincidence would constitute measurement of an
electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational wave signal, with significant
corresponding scientific benefits, including revealing the central engine
powering the gamma-ray burst, enhanced confidence in the event as a genuine
astrophysical detection, and a determination of the relative speed of the
photon and graviton.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.05858 [pdf] - 1391568
Synchrotron Origin of the Typical GRB Band Function - A Case Study of
GRB 130606B
Submitted: 2015-05-21
We perform a time-resolved spectral analysis of GRB 130606B within the
framework of a fast-cooling synchrotron radiation model with magnetic field
strength in the emission region decaying with time, as proposed by Uhm & Zhang.
The data from all time intervals can be successfully fit by the model. The same
data can be equally well fit by the empirical Band function with typical
parameter values. Our results, which involve only minimal physical assumptions,
offer one natural solution to the origin of the observed GRB spectra and imply
that, at least some, if not all, Band-like GRB spectra with typical Band
parameter values can indeed be explained by synchrotron radiation.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.02961 [pdf] - 1005759
Compton scattering in terrestrial gamma-ray flashes detected with the
Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Cramer, Eric;
McBreen, Sheila;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Foley, Suzanne;
Tierney, David;
Chaplin, Vandiver L.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Stanbro, Matthew;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Dwyer, Joseph;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2015-05-12
Terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) are short intense flashes of gamma rays
associated with lightning activity in thunderstorms. Using Monte Carlo
simulations of the relativistic runaway electron avalanche (RREA) process,
theoretical predictions for the temporal and spectral evolution of TGFs are
compared to observations made with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board
the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Assuming a single source altitude of 15
km, a comparison of simulations to data is performed for a range of empirically
chosen source electron variation time scales. The data exhibit a clear
softening with increased source distance, in qualitative agreement with
theoretical predictions. The simulated spectra follow this trend in the data,
but tend to underestimate the observed hardness. Such a discrepancy may imply
that the basic RREA model is not sufficient. Alternatively, a TGF beam that is
tilted with respect to the zenith could produce an evolution with source
distance that is compatible with the data. Based on these results, we propose
that the source electron distributions of TGFs observed by GBM vary on time
scales of at least tens of microseconds, with an upper limit of approx. 100
microseconds.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.02971 [pdf] - 1005761
Pulse properties of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes detected by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Foley, Suzanne;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Tierney, David;
McBreen, Sheila;
Dwyer, Joseph;
Chaplin, Vandiver L.;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Byrne, David;
Cramer, Eric;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2015-05-12
The Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi Gamma-ray Space
Telescope has triggered on over 300 terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) since
its launch in June 2008. With 14 detectors, GBM collects on average ~100 counts
per triggered TGF, enabling unprecedented studies of the time profiles of TGFs.
Here we present the first rigorous analysis of the temporal properties of a
large sample of TGFs (278), including the distributions of the rise and fall
times of the individual pulses and their durations. A variety of time profiles
are observed with 19 of TGFs having multiple pulses separated in time and 31
clear cases of partially overlapping pulses. The effect of instrumental dead
time and pulse pileup on the temporal properties are also presented. As the
observed gamma ray pulse structure is representative of the electron flux at
the source, TGF pulse parameters are critical to distinguish between
relativistic feedback discharge and lightning leader models. We show that at
least 67% of TGFs at satellite altitudes are significantly asymmetric. For the
asymmetric pulses, the rise times are almost always shorter than the fall
times. Those which are not are consistent with statistical fluctuations. The
median rise time for asymmetric pulses is ~3 times shorter than for symmetric
pulses while their fall times are comparable. The asymmetric shapes observed
are consistent with the relativistic feedback discharge model when Compton
scattering of photons between the source and Fermi is included, and
instrumental effects are taken into account.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.0929 [pdf] - 1222386
High-energy electromagnetic offline follow-up of LIGO-Virgo
gravitational-wave binary coalescence candidate events
Submitted: 2014-10-03, last modified: 2015-02-18
We present two different search methods for electromagnetic counterparts to
gravitational-wave (GW) events from ground-based detectors using archival NASA
high-energy data from the Fermi-GBM and RXTE-ASM instruments. To demonstrate
the methods, we use a limited number of representative GW background noise
events produced by a search for binary neutron star coalescence over the last
two months of the LIGO-Virgo S6/VSR3 joint science run. Time and sky location
provided by the GW data trigger a targeted search in the high-energy photon
data. We use two custom pipelines: one to search for prompt gamma-ray
counterparts in GBM, and the other to search for a variety of X-ray afterglow
model signals in ASM. We measure the efficiency of the joint pipelines to weak
gamma-ray burst counterparts, and a family of model X-ray afterglows. By
requiring a detectable signal in either electromagnetic instrument coincident
with a GW event, we are able to reject a large majority of GW candidates. This
reduces the signal-to-noise of the loudest surviving GW background event by
around 15-20%.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.02775 [pdf] - 920041
High-energy radiation from thunderstorms and lightning with LOFT
Marisaldi, M.;
Smith, D. M.;
Brandt, S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Budtz-Jørgensen, C.;
Campana, R.;
Carlson, B. E.;
Celestin, S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cummer, S. A.;
Dwyer, J. R.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Fullekrug, M.;
Fuschino, F.;
Gjesteland, T.;
Neubert, T.;
Østgaard, N.;
Tavani, M.
Submitted: 2015-01-12
This is a White Paper in support of the mission concept of the Large
Observatory for X-ray Timing (LOFT), proposed as a medium-sized ESA mission. We
discuss the potential of LOFT for the study of high-energy radiation from
thunderstorms and lightning. For a summary, we refer to the paper.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.2685 [pdf] - 1223104
Localization of Gamma-Ray Bursts using the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Connaughton, V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Goldstein, A.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Greiner, J.;
Gruber, D.;
Jenke, P.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Pelassa, V.;
Xiong, S.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Burgess, J. M.;
Byrne, D.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Foley, S.;
Giles, M. M.;
Guiriec, S.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
McGlynn, S.;
Tierney, D.;
Zhang, B. -B.
Submitted: 2014-11-10
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected over 1400 Gamma-Ray
Bursts (GRBs) since it began science operations in July, 2008. We use a subset
of over 300 GRBs localized by instruments such as Swift, the Fermi Large Area
Telescope, INTEGRAL, and MAXI, or through triangulations from the
InterPlanetary Network (IPN), to analyze the accuracy of GBM GRB localizations.
We find that the reported statistical uncertainties on GBM localizations, which
can be as small as 1 degree, underestimate the distance of the GBM positions to
the true GRB locations and we attribute this to systematic uncertainties. The
distribution of systematic uncertainties is well represented (68% confidence
level) by a 3.7 degree Gaussian with a non-Gaussian tail that contains about
10% of GBM-detected GRBs and extends to approximately 14 degrees. A more
complex model suggests that there is a dependence of the systematic uncertainty
on the position of the GRB in spacecraft coordinates, with GRBs in the
quadrants on the Y-axis better localized than those on the X-axis.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.1415 [pdf] - 1223030
Swift and Fermi observations of X-ray flares: the case of Late Internal
Shock
Submitted: 2014-11-05
Simultaneous Swift and Fermi observations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) offer a
unique broadband view of their afterglow emission, spanning more than ten
decades in energy. We present the sample of X-ray flares observed by both Swift
and Fermi during the first three years of Fermi operations. While bright in the
X-ray band, X-ray flares are often undetected at lower (optical), and higher
(MeV to GeV) energies. We show that this disfavors synchrotron self-Compton
processes as origin of the observed X-ray emission. We compare the broadband
properties of X-ray flares with the standard late internal shock model, and
find that, in this scenario, X-ray flares can be produced by a late-time
relativistic (Gamma>50) outflow at radii R~10^13-10^14 cm. This conclusion
holds only if the variability timescale is significantly shorter than the
observed flare duration, and implies that X-ray flares can directly probe the
activity of the GRB central engine.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.7602 [pdf] - 1286908
Synchrotron Cooling in Energetic Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Greiner, Jochen;
van Eerten, Hendrik;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Goldstein, Adam;
Gruber, David;
Jenke, Peter A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Zhang, Bin-Bin
Submitted: 2014-10-28
We study the time-resolved spectra of eight GRBs observed by Fermi GBM in its
first five years of mission, with 1 keV - 1 MeV fluence $f>1.0\times10^{-4}$
erg cm$^{-2}$ and signal-to-noise level $\text{S/N}\geq10.0$ above 900 keV. We
aim to constrain in detail the spectral properties of GRB prompt emission on a
time-resolved basis and to discuss the theoretical implications of the fitting
results in the context of various prompt emission models. We perform
time-resolved spectral analysis using a variable temporal binning technique
according to optimal S/N criteria, resulting in a total of 299 time-resolved
spectra. We fit the Band function to all spectra and obtain the distributions
for the low-energy power-law index $\alpha$, the high-energy power-law index
$\beta$, the peak energy in the observed $\nu F_\nu$ spectrum $E_\text{p}$, and
the difference between the low- and high-energy power-law indices $\Delta
s=\alpha-\beta$. Using the distributions of $\Delta s$ and $\beta$, the
electron population index $p$ is found to be consistent with the "moderately
fast" scenario which fast- and slow-cooling scenarios cannot be distinguished.
We also apply a physically motivated synchrotron model, which is a triple
power-law with constrained power-law indices and a blackbody component, to test
for consistency with a synchrotron origin for the prompt emission and obtain
the distributions for the two break energies $E_\text{b,1}$ and $E_\text{b,2}$,
the middle segment power-law index $\beta$, and the Planck function temperature
$kT$. A synchrotron model is found consistent with the majority of
time-resolved spectra for these eight energetic Fermi GBM bursts with good
high-energy photon statistics, as long as both the cooling and injection break
are included and the leftmost spectral slope is lifted either by inclusion of a
thermal component or when an evolving magnetic field is accounted for.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.5367 [pdf] - 1451811
Constraints on Very High Energy Emission from GRB 130427A
Aliu, E.;
Aune, T.;
Barnacka, A.;
Beilicke, M.;
Benbow, W.;
Berger, K.;
Biteau, J.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V.;
Byrum, K.;
Cardenzana, J. V;
Cerruti, M.;
Chen, X.;
Ciupik, L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cui, W.;
Dickinson, H. J.;
Eisch, J. D.;
Errando, M.;
Falcone, A.;
Federici, S.;
Feng, Q.;
Finley, J. P.;
Fleischhack, H.;
Fortin, P.;
Fortson, L.;
Furniss, A.;
Galante, N.;
Gillanders, G. H.;
Griffin, S.;
Griffiths, S. T.;
Grube, J.;
Gyuk, G.;
Håkansson, N.;
Hanna, D.;
Holder, J.;
Hughes, G.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Johnson, C. A.;
Kaaret, P.;
Kar, P.;
Kertzman, M.;
Khassen, Y.;
Kieda, D.;
Krawczynski, H.;
Krennrich, F.;
Lang, M. J.;
Madhavan, A. S.;
Maier, G.;
McArthur, S.;
McCann, A.;
Meagher, K.;
Millis, J.;
Moriarty, P.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Nieto, D.;
de Bhróithe, A. O'Faoláin;
Ong, R. A.;
Otte, A. N.;
Park, N.;
Pohl, M.;
Popkow, A.;
Prokoph, H.;
Pueschel, E.;
Quinn, J.;
Ragan, K.;
Rajotte, J.;
Reyes, L. C.;
Reynolds, P. T.;
Richards, G. T.;
Roache, E.;
Sembroski, G. H.;
Shahinyan, K.;
Smith, A. W.;
Staszak, D.;
Telezhinsky, I.;
Tucci, J. V.;
Tyler, J.;
Varlotta, A.;
Vassiliev, V. V.;
Vincent, S.;
Wakely, S. P.;
Weiner, O. M.;
Weinstein, A.;
Welsing, R.;
Wilhelm, A.;
Williams, D. A.;
Zitzer, B.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Veres, P.;
Zhu, S.
Submitted: 2014-10-20
Prompt emission from the very fluent and nearby (z=0.34) gamma-ray burst GRB
130427A was detected by several orbiting telescopes and by ground-based,
wide-field-of-view optical transient monitors. Apart from the intensity and
proximity of this GRB, it is exceptional due to the extremely long-lived
high-energy (100 MeV to 100 GeV) gamma-ray emission, which was detected by the
Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope for ~70 ks after
the initial burst. The persistent, hard-spectrum, high-energy emission suggests
that the highest-energy gamma rays may have been produced via synchrotron
self-Compton processes though there is also evidence that the high-energy
emission may instead be an extension of the synchrotron spectrum. VERITAS, a
ground-based imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescope array, began follow-up
observations of GRB 130427A ~71 ks (~20 hr) after the onset of the burst. The
GRB was not detected with VERITAS; however, the high elevation of the
observations, coupled with the low redshift of the GRB, make VERITAS a very
sensitive probe of the emission from GRB 130427A for E > 100 GeV. The
non-detection and consequent upper limit derived place constraints on the
synchrotron self-Compton model of high-energy gamma-ray emission from this
burst.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6119 [pdf] - 1208562
Cherenkov Telescope Array is Well Suited to Follow Up Gravitational Wave
Transients
Bartos, Imre;
Veres, Peter;
Nieto, Daniel;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Humensky, Brian;
Hurley, Kevin;
Marka, Szabolcs;
Meszaros, Peter;
Mukherjee, Reshmi;
O'Brien, Paul;
Osborne, Julian P.
Submitted: 2014-03-24, last modified: 2014-06-17
The first gravitational-wave (GW) observations will greatly benefit from the
detection of coincident electromagnetic counterparts. Electromagnetic
follow-ups will nevertheless be challenging for GWs with poorly reconstructed
directions. GW source localization can be inefficient (i) if only two GW
observatories are in operation; (ii) if the detectors' sensitivities are highly
non-uniform; (iii) for events near the detectors' horizon distance. For these
events, follow-up observations will need to cover 100-1000 square degrees of
the sky over a limited period of time, reducing the list of suitable
telescopes. We demonstrate that the Cherenkov Telescope Array will be capable
of following up GW event candidates over the required large sky area with
sufficient sensitivity to detect short gamma-ray bursts, which are thought to
originate from compact binary mergers, out to the horizon distance of advanced
LIGO/Virgo. CTA can therefore be invaluable starting with the first
multimessenger detections, even with poorly reconstructed GW source directions.
This scenario also provides a further scientific incentive for GW observatories
to further decrease the delay of their event reconstruction.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6639 [pdf] - 848128
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts detected
by the InterPlanetary Network
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Alemic, A.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Amariutei, D.;
Andersen, M.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Augustus, H.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barbet, M.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belczynski, C.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, Sukanta;
Bosi, L.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Buchman, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burman, R.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castaldi, G.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Celerier, C.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C.;
Colombini, M.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Croce, R. P.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, C.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dickson, J.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Dominguez, E.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edo, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Gräf, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C. J.;
Gushwa, K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, J.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, W.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hart, M.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horrom, T.;
Hoske, D.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Huerta, E.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
Jang, H.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Ji, Y.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karlen, J.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keiser, G. M.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N. G.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nanda;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, P. J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. Le;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libbrecht, K.;
Libson, A.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lopez, E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Ma, Y.;
Macdonald, E. P.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Maglione, C.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mangini, N. M.;
Mansell, G.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martinelli, L.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McLin, K.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meinders, M.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A. H.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Omar, S.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, R.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ortega, W.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poteomkin, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Ramirez, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Recchia, S.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Reula, O.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S. B.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sankar, S.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schilling, R.;
Schilman, M.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Staley, A.;
Stebbins, J.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, J.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Tellez, G.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Tshilumba, D.;
Tuennermann, H.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Heijningen, J.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, K.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wolovick, N.;
Worden, J.;
Wu, Y.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, Fan;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Atteia, J. L.;
Cline, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Palmer, D.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Terada, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2014-03-26, last modified: 2014-04-17
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
223 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the InterPlanetary Network (IPN) in
2005-2010 during LIGO's fifth and sixth science runs and Virgo's first, second
and third science runs. The IPN satellites provide accurate times of the bursts
and sky localizations that vary significantly from degree scale to hundreds of
square degrees. We search for both a well-modeled binary coalescence signal,
the favored progenitor model for short GRBs, and for generic, unmodeled
gravitational wave bursts. Both searches use the event time and sky
localization to improve the gravitational-wave search sensitivity as compared
to corresponding all-time, all-sky searches. We find no evidence of a
gravitational-wave signal associated with any of the IPN GRBs in the sample,
nor do we find evidence for a population of weak gravitational-wave signals
associated with the GRBs. For all IPN-detected GRBs, for which a sufficient
duration of quality gravitational-wave data is available, we place lower bounds
on the distance to the source in accordance with an optimistic assumption of
gravitational-wave emission energy of $10^{-2}M_{\odot}c^2$ at 150 Hz, and find
a median of 13 Mpc. For the 27 short-hard GRBs we place 90% confidence
exclusion distances to two source models: a binary neutron star coalescence,
with a median distance of 12Mpc, or the coalescence of a neutron star and black
hole, with a median distance of 22 Mpc. Finally, we combine this search with
previously published results to provide a population statement for GRB searches
in first-generation LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave detectors, and a
resulting examination of prospects for the advanced gravitational-wave
detectors.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.2540 [pdf] - 1579483
How Long does a Burst Burst?
Submitted: 2013-10-09, last modified: 2014-04-01
Several gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) last much longer (~hours) in gamma-rays than
typical long GRBs (~ minutes), and recently it was proposed that these
"ultra-long GRBs" may form a distinct population, probably with a different
(e.g. blue supergiant) progenitor than typical GRBs. However, Swift
observations suggest that many GRBs have extended central engine activities
manifested as flares and internal plateaus in X-rays. We perform a
comprehensive study on a large sample of Swift GRBs with XRT observations to
investigate GRB central engine activity duration and to determine whether
ultra-long GRBs are unusual events. We define burst duration t_burst based on
both gamma-ray and X-ray light curves rather than using gamma-ray observations
alone. We find that t_burst can be reliably measured in 343 GRBs. Within this
"good" sample, 21.9% GRBs have t_burst >=10^3 s and 11.5% GRBs have t_burst
>=10^4 s. There is an apparent bimodal distribution of t_burst in this sample.
However, when we consider an "undetermined" sample (304 GRBs) with t_burst
possibly falling in the gap between GRB duration T_90 and the first X-ray
observational time, as well as a selection effect against t_burst falling into
the first Swift orbital "dead zone" due to observation constraints, the
intrinsic underlying t_burst distribution is consistent with being a single
component distribution. We found that the existing evidence for a separate
ultra-long GRB population is inconclusive, and further multi-wavelength
observations are needed to draw a firmer conclusion. We also discuss the
theoretical implications of our results. In particular, the central engine
activity duration of GRBs is generally much longer than the gamma-ray T90
duration and it does not even correlate with T90. It would be premature to make
a direct connection between T90 and the size of the progenitor star.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.0374 [pdf] - 1203660
An Observed Correlation Between Thermal and Non-Thermal Emission in
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Burgess, J. Michael;
Preece, Robert D.;
Ryde, Felix;
Veres, Peter;
Meszaros, Peter;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Briggs, Michael;
Pe'er, Asaf;
Iyyani, Shabnam;
Goldstein, Adam;
Axelsson, Magnus;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Byrne, David;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Omodei, Nicola;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Yu, Hoi-Fung;
Zhang, Binbin;
Zhu, Sylvia
Submitted: 2014-03-03
Recent observations by the $Fermi$ Gamma-ray Space Telescope have confirmed
the existence of thermal and non-thermal components in the prompt photon
spectra of some Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Through an analysis of six bright
Fermi GRBs, we have discovered a correlation between the observed photospheric
and non-thermal $\gamma$-ray emission components of several GRBs using a
physical model that has previously been shown to be a good fit to the Fermi
data. From the spectral parameters of these fits we find that the
characteristic energies, $E_{\rm p}$ and $kT$, of these two components are
correlated via the relation $E_{\rm p} \propto T^{\alpha}$ which varies from
GRB to GRB. We present an interpretation in which the value of index $\alpha$
indicates whether the jet is dominated by kinetic or magnetic energy. To date,
this jet composition parameter has been assumed in the modeling of GRB outflows
rather than derived from the data.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.5080 [pdf] - 789271
The 2nd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Four Years
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Byrne, David;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Cleveland, William;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Collazzi, Andrew C.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Layden, Emily;
McBreen, Sheila;
McGlynn, Sinead;
Pelassa, Veronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung
Submitted: 2014-01-20, last modified: 2014-01-24
This is the second of a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
observed with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). It extends the first
two-year catalog by two more years, resulting in an overall list of 953 GBM
triggered GRBs. The intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information
to the community on the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs.
For each GRB the location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the
duration, peak flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are
calculated for the 50 - 300 keV energy band, where the maximum energy release
of GRBs in the instrument reference system is observed and also for a broader
energy band from 10 - 1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBMs
low-energy detectors. Furthermore, information is given on the settings and
modifications of the triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions
during years three and four in the mission. This second catalog is an official
product of the Fermi GBM science team, and the data files containing the
complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science
Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.5069 [pdf] - 791904
The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Catalog: Four Years Of Data
Gruber, David;
Goldstein, Adam;
von Ahlefeld, Victoria Weller;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Byrne, Dave;
Cleveland, William H.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Layden, Emily;
Lin, Lin;
Meegan, Charles A.;
McGlynn, Sinéad;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Véronique;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Xiong, Shaolin;
Younes, George;
Yu, Hoi-Fung
Submitted: 2014-01-20, last modified: 2014-01-22
In this catalog we present the updated set of spectral analyses of GRBs
detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first four years
of operation. It contains two types of spectra, time-integrated spectral fits
and spectral fits at the brightest time bin, from 943 triggered GRBs. Four
different spectral models were fitted to the data, resulting in a compendium of
more than 7500 spectra. The analysis was performed similarly, but not
identically to Goldstein et al. 2012. All 487 GRBs from the first two years
have been re-fitted using the same methodology as that of the 456 GRBs in years
three and four. We describe, in detail, our procedure and criteria for the
analysis, and present the results in the form of parameter distributions both
for the observer-frame and rest-frame quantities. The data files containing the
complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science
Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.4628 [pdf] - 790642
Time-resolved Analysis of Fermi GRBs with Fast and Slow-Cooled
Synchrotron Photon Models
Burgess, J. M.;
Preece, R. D.;
Connaughton, V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Goldstein, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Greiner, J.;
Gruber, D.;
Kienlin, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
McGlynn, S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Rau, A.;
Xiong, S.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baring, M. G.;
Dermer, C. D.;
Iyyani, S.;
Kocevski, D.;
Omodei, N.;
Ryde, F.;
Vianello, G.
Submitted: 2013-04-16, last modified: 2013-12-11
Time-resolved spectroscopy is performed on eight bright, long gamma-ray
bursts (GRBs) dominated by single emission pulses that were observed with the
{\it Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope}. Fitting the prompt radiation of GRBs by
empirical spectral forms such as the Band function leads to ambiguous
conclusions about the physical model for the prompt radiation. Moreover, the
Band function is often inadequate to fit the data. The GRB spectrum is
therefore modeled with two emission components consisting of optically thin
nonthermal synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons and, when
significant, thermal emission from a jet photosphere, which is represented by a
blackbody spectrum. To produce an acceptable fit, the addition of a blackbody
component is required in 5 out of the 8 cases. We also find that the low-energy
spectral index \alpha is consistent with a synchrotron component with \alpha =
-0.81\pm 0.1. This value lies between the limiting values of \alpha = -2/3 and
\alpha = -3/2 for electrons in the slow and fast-cooling regimes, respectively,
suggesting ongoing acceleration at the emission site. The blackbody component
can be more significant when using a physical synchrotron model instead of the
Band function, illustrating that the Band function does not serve as a good
proxy for a nonthermal synchrotron emission component. The temperature and
characteristic emission-region size of the blackbody component are found to,
respectively, decrease and increase as power laws with time during the prompt
phase. In addition, we find that the blackbody and nonthermal components have
separate temporal behaviors.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5581 [pdf] - 750298
The First Pulse of the Extremely Bright GRB 130427A: A Test Lab for
Synchrotron Shocks
Preece, R.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
von Kienlin, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Byrne, D.;
Chaplin, V.;
Cleveland, W.;
Collazzi, A. C.;
Connaughton, V.;
Diekmann, A.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Foley, S.;
Gibby, M.;
Giles, M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Gruber, D.;
Jenke, P.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Pelassa, V.;
Tierney, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.;
Xiong, S.;
Younes, G.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Ackermann, M.;
Ajello, M.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Bonamente, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brigida, M.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Buson, S.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cecchi, C.;
Charles, E.;
Chekhtman, A.;
Chiang, J.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Claus, R.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Conrad, J.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Angelis, A.;
de Palma, F.;
Dermer, C. D.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Venere, L.;
Drell, P. S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Germani, S.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Godfrey, G.;
Granot, J.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harding, A. K.;
Hayashida, M.;
Iyyani, S.;
Jogler, T.;
Jóannesson, G.;
Kawano, T.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
Lande, J.;
Larsson, J.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Mayer, M.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Moretti, E.;
Morselli, A.;
Murgia, S.;
Nemmen, R.;
Nuss, E.;
Nymark, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohsugi, T.;
Okumura, A.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Piron, F.;
Pivato, G.;
Porter, T. A.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Rainò, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Ritz, S.;
Roth, M.;
Ryde, F.;
Sartori, A.;
Scargle, J. D.;
Schulz, A.;
Sgrò, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Takahashi, H.;
Thayer, J. G.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Tinivella, M.;
Torres, D. F.;
Tosti, G.;
Troja, E.;
Usher, T. L.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Vasileiou, V.;
Vianello, G.;
Vitale, V.;
Werner, M.;
Winer, B. L.;
Wood, K. S.;
Zhu, S.
Submitted: 2013-11-21
Gamma-ray burst (GRB) 130427A is one of the most energetic GRBs ever
observed. The initial pulse up to 2.5 s is possibly the brightest well-isolated
pulse observed to date. A fine time resolution spectral analysis shows
power-law decays of the peak energy from the onset of the pulse, consistent
with models of internal synchrotron shock pulses. However, a strongly
correlated power-law behavior is observed between the luminosity and the
spectral peak energy that is inconsistent with curvature effects arising in the
relativistic outflow. It is difficult for any of the existing models to account
for all of the observed spectral and temporal behaviors simultaneously.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.4072 [pdf] - 1937877
Schwarzschild-Couder telescope for the Cherenkov Telescope Array:
Development of the Optical System
Submitted: 2013-07-15
The CTA (Cherenkov Telescope Array) is the next generation ground-based
experiment for very high-energy (VHE) gamma-ray observations. It will integrate
several tens of imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (IACTs) with different
apertures into a single astronomical instrument. The US part of the CTA
collaboration has proposed and is developing a novel IACT design with a
Schwarzschild-Couder (SC) aplanatic two mirror optical system. In comparison
with the traditional single mirror Davies-Cotton IACT the SC telescope, by
design, can accommodate a wide field-of-view, with significantly improved
imaging resolution. In addition, the reduced plate scale of an SC telescope
makes it compatible with highly integrated cameras assembled from silicon photo
multipliers. In this submission we report on the status of the development of
the SC optical system, which is part of the effort to construct a full-scale
prototype telescope of this type at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory in
southern Arizona.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.2174 [pdf] - 663058
Techniques for targeted Fermi-GBM follow-up of gravitational-wave events
Submitted: 2013-03-09, last modified: 2013-05-14
The Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo ground-based gravitational-wave
detectors are projected to come online 2015-2016, reaching a final sensitivity
sufficient to observe dozens of binary neutron star mergers per year by 2018.
We present a fully-automated, targeted search strategy for prompt gamma-ray
counterparts in offline Fermi-GBM data. The multi-detector method makes use of
a detailed model response of the instrument, and benefits from time and sky
location information derived from the gravitational-wave signal.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.2478 [pdf] - 662659
An evaluation of the exposure in nadir observation of the JEM-EUSO
mission
Adams, J. H.;
Ahmad, S.;
Albert, J. -N.;
Allard, D.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Anzalone, A.;
Arai, Y.;
Aramo, C.;
Asano, K.;
Ave, M.;
Barrillon, P.;
Batsch, T.;
Bayer, J.;
Belenguer, T.;
Bellotti, R.;
Berlind, A. A.;
Bertaina, M.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Biktemerova, S.;
Blaksley, C.;
Blecki, J.;
Blin-Bondil, S.;
Bluemer, J.;
Bobik, P.;
Bogomilov, M.;
Bonamente, M.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Briz, S.;
Bruno, A.;
Cafagna, F.;
Campana, D.;
Capdevielle, J-N.;
Caruso, R.;
Casolino, M.;
Cassardo, C.;
Castellini, G.;
Catalano, O.;
Cellino, A.;
Chikawa, M.;
Christl, M. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cortes, J. F.;
Crawford, H. J.;
Cremonini, R.;
Csorna, S.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
de Castro, A. J.;
De Donato, C.;
de la Taille, C.;
del Peral, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
De Pascale, M. P.;
Di Martino, M.;
Distratis, G.;
Dupieux, M.;
Ebersoldt, A.;
Ebisuzaki, T.;
Engel, R.;
Falk, S.;
Fang, K.;
Fenu, F.;
Fernandez-Gomez, I.;
Ferrarese, S.;
Franceschi, A.;
Fujimoto, J.;
Galeotti, P.;
Garipov, G.;
Geary, J.;
Giaccari, U. G.;
Giraudo, G.;
Gonchar, M.;
Alvarado, C. Gonzalez;
Gorodetzky, P.;
Guarino, F.;
Guzman, A.;
Hachisu, Y.;
Harlov, B.;
Haungs, A.;
Carretero, J. Hernandez;
Higashide, K.;
Iguchi, T.;
Ikeda, H.;
Inoue, N.;
Inoue, S.;
Insolia, A.;
Isgrio, F.;
Itow, Y.;
Joven, E.;
Judd, E. G.;
Jung, A.;
Kajino, F.;
Kajino, T.;
Kaneko, I.;
Karadzhov, Y.;
Karczmarczyk, J.;
Katahira, K.;
Kawai, K.;
Kawasaki, Y.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Khrenov, B. A.;
Kim, Jeong-Sook;
Kim, Soon-Wook;
Kim, Sug-Whan;
Kleifges, M.;
Klimov, P. A.;
Ko, S. H.;
Kolev, D.;
Kreykenbohm, I.;
Kudela, K.;
Kurihara, Y.;
Kuznetsov, E.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lee, J.;
Licandro, J.;
Lim, H.;
Lopez, F.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Mannheim, K.;
Marcelli, L.;
Marini, A.;
Martin-Chassard, G.;
Martinez, O.;
Masciantonio, G.;
Mase, K.;
Matev, R.;
Maurissen, A.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mernik, T.;
Miyamoto, H.;
Miyazaki, Y.;
Mizumoto, Y.;
Modestino, G.;
Monnier-Ragaigne, D.;
Rios, J. A. Morales de los;
Mot, B.;
Murakami, T.;
Nagano, M.;
Nagata, M.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nakamura, T.;
Nam, J. W.;
Nam, S.;
Nam, K.;
Napolitano, T.;
Naumov, D.;
Neronov, A.;
Nomoto, K.;
Ogawa, T.;
Ohmori, H.;
Olinto, A. V.;
Orleanski, P.;
Osteria, G.;
Pacheco, N.;
Panasyuk, M. I.;
Parizot, E.;
Park, I. H.;
Pastircak, B.;
Patzak, T.;
Paul, T.;
Pennypacker, C.;
Peter, T.;
Picozza, P.;
Pollini, A.;
Prieto, H.;
Reardon, P.;
Reina, M.;
Reyes, M.;
Ricci, M.;
Rodriguez, I.;
Frias, M. D. Rodriguez;
Ronga, F.;
Rothkaehl, H.;
Roudil, G.;
Rusinov, I.;
Rybczynski, M.;
Sabau, M. D.;
Cano, G. Saez;
Saito, A.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sakata, M.;
Salazar, H.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santangelo, A.;
Cruz, L. Santiago;
Palomino, M. Sanz;
Saprykin, O.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sato, H.;
Sato, M.;
Schanz, T.;
Schieler, H.;
Scotti, V.;
Scuderi, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Selmane, S.;
Semikoz, D.;
Serra, M.;
Sharakin, S.;
Shibata, T.;
Shimizu, H. M.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shirahama, T.;
Siemieniec-Ozieb, G.;
Lopez, H. H. Silva;
Sledd, J.;
Slominska, K.;
Sobey, A.;
Sugiyama, T.;
Supanitsky, D.;
Suzuki, M.;
Szabelska, B.;
Szabelski, J.;
Tajima, F.;
Tajima, N.;
Tajima, T.;
Takahashi, Y.;
Takami, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Takizawa, Y.;
Tenzer, C.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tkachev, L.;
Tomida, T.;
Tone, N.;
Trillaud, F.;
Tsenov, R.;
Tsuno, K.;
Tymieniecka, T.;
Uchihori, Y.;
Vaduvescu, O.;
Valdes-Galicia, J. F.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
Vankova, G.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villasenor, L.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Wada, S.;
Watanabe, J.;
Watanabe, S.;
Watts, J.;
Weber, M.;
Weiler, T. J.;
Wibig, T.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wille, M.;
Wilms, J.;
Wlodarczyk, Z.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamamoto, Y.;
Yang, J.;
Yano, H.;
Yashin, I. V.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Yoshida, K.;
Yoshida, S.;
Young, R.;
Zamora, A.;
Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Submitted: 2013-05-11
We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme
Universe Space Observatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the
International Space Station. Designed as a mission to explore the extreme
energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth's nighttime
atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive
air showers initiated by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we
discuss the particularities of space-based observation and we compute the
annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the
expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the
investigations of the effects of clouds and different types of background
light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of magnitude higher
than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.6592 [pdf] - 657320
Analytical modeling of pulse-pileup distortion using the true pulse
shape; applications to Fermi-GBM
Submitted: 2012-11-28, last modified: 2013-04-29
Pulse-pileup affects most photon counting systems and occurs when photon
detections occur faster than the detector's registration and recovery time. At
high input rates, shaped pulses interfere and the source spectrum, as well as
intensity information, get distorted. For instruments using bipolar pulse
shaping there are two aspects to consider: `peak' and `tail' pileup effects,
which raise and lower the measured energy, respectively. Peak effects have been
extensively modeled in the past. Tail effects have garnered less attention due
to the increased complexity: bipolar tails mean the tail pulse-height
measurement depends on events in more than one time interval. We leverage
previous work to derive an accurate, semi-analytical prediction for peak and
tail pileup, up to high orders. We use the true pulse shape from the detectors
of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor. The measured spectrum is calculated by
writing exposure time as a state-space expansion of overlapping pileup states
and is valid up to very high rates. This expansion models losses due to fixed
and extendable deadtime by averaging overlap configurations. Additionally, the
model correctly predicts energy-dependent losses due to tail subtraction
(sub-threshold) effects. We discuss pileup losses in terms of the true rate of
photon detections versus the recorded count rate.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4859 [pdf] - 1159175
Anomalies in low-energy Gamma-Ray Burst spectra with the Fermi Gamma-Ray
Burst Monitor
Tierney, Dave;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert D.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McGlynn, Sinead;
Paciesas, William S.;
Pelassa, Veronique;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2013-01-21
A Band function has become the standard spectral function used to describe
the prompt emission spectra of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). However, deviations
from this function have previously been observed in GRBs detected by BATSE and
in individual GRBs from the \textit{Fermi} era. We present a systematic and
rigorous search for spectral deviations from a Band function at low energies in
a sample of the first two years of high fluence, long bursts detected by the
\textit{Fermi} Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). The sample contains 45 bursts
with a fluence greater than 2$\times10^{-5}$ erg / cm$^{2}$ (10 - 1000 keV). An
extrapolated fit method is used to search for low-energy spectral anomalies,
whereby a Band function is fit above a variable low-energy threshold and then
the best fit function is extrapolated to lower energy data. Deviations are
quantified by examining residuals derived from the extrapolated function and
the data and their significance is determined via comprehensive simulations
which account for the instrument response. This method was employed for both
time-integrated burst spectra and time-resolved bins defined by a signal to
noise ratio of 25 $\sigma$ and 50 $\sigma$. Significant deviations are evident
in 3 bursts (GRB\,081215A, GRB\,090424 and GRB\,090902B) in the time-integrated
sample ($\sim$ 7%) and 5 bursts (GRB\,090323, GRB\,090424, GRB\,090820,
GRB\,090902B and GRB\,090926A) in the time-resolved sample ($\sim$ 11%).} The
advantage of the systematic, blind search analysis is that it can demonstrate
the requirement for an additional spectral component without any prior
knowledge of the nature of that extra component. Deviations are found in a
large fraction of high fluence GRBs; fainter GRBs may not have sufficient
statistics for deviations to be found using this method.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3014 [pdf] - 1937821
Gamma-Ray Burst Science in the Era of the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Inoue, Susumu;
Granot, Jonathan;
O'Brien, Paul T.;
Asano, Katsuaki;
Bouvier, Aurelien;
Carosi, Alessandro;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Garczarczyk, Markus;
Gilmore, Rudy;
Hinton, Jim;
Inoue, Yoshiyuki;
Ioka, Kunihito;
Kakuwa, Jun;
Markoff, Sera;
Murase, Kohta;
Osborne, Julian P.;
Otte, A. Nepomuk;
Starling, Rhaana;
Tajima, Hiroyasu;
Teshima, Masahiro;
Toma, Kenji;
Wagner, Stefan;
Wijers, Ralph A. M. J.;
Williams, David A.;
Yamamoto, Tokonatsu;
Yamazaki, Ryo
Submitted: 2013-01-14, last modified: 2013-01-15
We outline the science prospects for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with the
Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA), the next-generation ground-based gamma-ray
observatory operating at energies above few tens of GeV. With its low energy
threshold, large effective area and rapid slewing capabilities, CTA will be
able to measure the spectra and variability of GRBs at multi-GeV energies with
unprecedented photon statistics, and thereby break new ground in elucidating
the physics of GRBs, which is still poorly understood. Such measurements will
also provide crucial diagnostics of ultra-high-energy cosmic ray and neutrino
production in GRBs, advance observational cosmology by probing the
high-redshift extragalactic background light and intergalactic magnetic fields,
and contribute to fundamental physics by testing Lorentz invariance violation
with high precision. Aiming to quantify these goals, we present some simulated
observations of GRB spectra and light curves, together with estimates of their
detection rates with CTA. Although the expected detection rate is modest, of
order a few GRBs per year, hundreds or more high-energy photons per burst may
be attainable once they are detected. We also address various issues related to
following up alerts from satellites and other facilities with CTA, as well as
follow-up observations at other wavelengths. The possibility of discovering and
observing GRBs from their onset including short GRBs during a wide-field survey
mode is also briefly discussed.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.5369 [pdf] - 1152287
Background estimation in a wide-field background-limited instrument such
as Fermi GBM
Submitted: 2012-10-19
The supporting instrument on board the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, the
Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is a wide-field gamma-ray monitor composed of 14
individual scintillation detectors, with a field of view which encompasses the
entire unocculted sky. Primarily designed as transient monitors, the
conventional method for background determination with GBM-like instruments is
to time interpolate intervals before and after the source as a polynomial. This
is generally sufficient for sharp impulsive phenomena such as Gamma-Ray Bursts
(GRBs) which are characterised by impulsive peaks with sharp rises, often
highly structured, and easily distinguishable against instrumental backgrounds.
However, smoother long lived emission, such as observed in solar flares and
some GRBs, would be difficult to detect in a background-limited instrument
using this method. We present here a description of a technique which uses the
rates from adjacent days when the satellite has approximately the same
geographical footprint to distinguish low-level emission from the instrumental
background. We present results from the application of this technique to GBM
data and discuss the implementation of it in a generalised background limited
detector in a non-equatorial orbit.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.6053 [pdf] - 1151675
The Fermi-GBM X-ray burst monitor: thermonuclear bursts from 4U 0614+09
Linares, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Jenke, P.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Camero-Arranz, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Chakrabarty, D.;
Beklen, E.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Finger, M.;
Paciesas, W.;
Preece, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2012-09-26
Thermonuclear bursts from slowly accreting neutron stars (NSs) have proven
difficult to detect, yet they are potential probes of the thermal properties of
the neutron star interior. During the first year of a systematic all-sky search
for X-ray bursts using the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) aboard the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope we have detected 15 thermonuclear bursts from the NS
low-mass X-ray binary 4U 0614+09, when it was accreting at nearly 1% of the
Eddington limit. We measured an average burst recurrence time of 12+/-3 d (68%
confidence interval) between March 2010 and March 2011, classified all bursts
as normal duration bursts and placed a lower limit on the recurrence time of
long/intermediate bursts of 62 d (95% confidence level). We discuss how
observations of thermonuclear bursts in the hard X-ray band compare to pointed
soft X-ray observations, and quantify such bandpass effects on measurements of
burst radiated energy and duration. We put our results for 4U 0614+09 in the
context of other bursters and briefly discuss the constraints on ignition
models. Interestingly, we find that the burst energies in 4U 0614+09 are on
average between those of normal duration bursts and those measured in
long/intermediate bursts. Such a continuous distribution in burst energy
provides a new observational link between normal and long/intermediate bursts.
We suggest that the apparent bimodal distribution that defined normal and
long/intermediate duration bursts during the last decade could be due to an
observational bias towards detecting only the longest and most energetic bursts
from slowly accreting NSs.
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.2216 [pdf] - 1123285
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts during
LIGO science run 6 and Virgo science runs 2 and 3
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barayoga, J. C. B.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Bebronne, M.;
Beck, D.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Berliner, J. M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Blom, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosi, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, W.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Chow, J.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Conte, A.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordier, M.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, R. M.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
del Prete, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilio, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Endröczi, G.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, K.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Forte, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fujimoto, M. -K.;
Fulda, P. J.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garufi, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Geng, R.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Gergely, L. Á.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gil-Casanova, S.;
Gill, C.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Gray, N.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greverie, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, T.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardt, A.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayau, J. -F.;
Heefner, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holtrop, M.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
James, E.;
Jang, Y. J.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jesse, E.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kasturi, R.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kelley, D.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Keresztes, Z.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, B. K.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, Y. M.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kranz, O.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lawrie, C.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Liguori, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Liu, Y.;
Liu, Z.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
McWilliams, S.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mori, T.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mosca, S.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nash, T.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Necula, V.;
Nelson, J.;
Neri, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E.;
Nuttall, L.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Palladino, L.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoletti, R.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parisi, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pedraza, M.;
Peiris, P.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichetti, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pietka, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Poggiani, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Re, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rodriguez, C.;
Rodruck, M.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sainathan, P.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R. L.;
Schilling, R.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G. R.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandio, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Stein, L. C.;
Steinert, E.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Taffarello, L.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
ter Braack, A. P. M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Tucker, E.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tseng, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Putten, S.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidis, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wan, Y.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Z.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, F.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, W.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Jenke, P. A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2012-05-10, last modified: 2012-09-24
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
154 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) that were detected by satellite-based gamma-ray
experiments in 2009-2010, during the sixth LIGO science run and the second and
third Virgo science runs. We perform two distinct searches: a modeled search
for coalescences of either two neutron stars or a neutron star and black hole;
and a search for generic, unmodeled gravitational-wave bursts. We find no
evidence for gravitational-wave counterparts, either with any individual GRB in
this sample or with the population as a whole. For all GRBs we place lower
bounds on the distance to the progenitor, under the optimistic assumption of a
gravitational-wave emission energy of 10^-2 M c^2 at 150 Hz, with a median
limit of 17 Mpc. For short hard GRBs we place exclusion distances on binary
neutron star and neutron star-black hole progenitors, using astrophysically
motivated priors on the source parameters, with median values of 16 Mpc and 28
Mpc respectively. These distance limits, while significantly larger than for a
search that is not aided by GRB satellite observations, are not large enough to
expect a coincidence with a GRB. However, projecting these exclusions to the
sensitivities of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, which should begin operation in 2015,
we find that the detection of gravitational waves associated with GRBs will
become quite possible.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.3585 [pdf] - 1093039
Three years of Fermi GBM Earth Occultation Monitoring: Observations of
Hard X-ray/Soft Gamma-Ray Sources
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Case, Gary L.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Rodi, James;
Camero-Arranz, Ascension;
Jenke, Peter;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Beklen, Elif;
Finger, Mark;
Bhat, Narayan;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
von Kienlin, Andreas
Submitted: 2012-01-17, last modified: 2012-06-22
The Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board Fermi has been providing
continuous data to the astronomical community since 2008 August 12. In this
paper we present the results of the analysis of the first three years of these
continuous data using the Earth occultation technique to monitor a catalog of
209 sources. From this catalog, we detect 99 sources, including 40 low-mass
X-ray binary/neutron star systems, 31 high-mass X-ray binary neutron star
systems, 12 black hole binaries, 12 active galaxies, 2 other sources, plus the
Crab Nebula, and the Sun. Nine of these sources are detected in the 100-300 keV
band, including seven black-hole binaries, the active galaxy Cen A, and the
Crab. The Crab and Cyg X-1 are also detected in the 300-500 keV band. GBM
provides complementary data to other sky-monitors below 100 keV and is the only
all-sky monitor above 100 keV. Up-to-date light curves for all of the catalog
sources can be found at http://heastro.phys.lsu.edu/gbm/.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.3451 [pdf] - 517321
Summary Report of JEM-EUSO Workshop at KICP in Chicago
Adams, J. H.;
Anchordoqui, L. A.;
Bertaina, M.;
Christl, M. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Csorna, S. E.;
Ebisuzaki, T.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Olinto, A. V.;
Paul, T.;
Picozza, P.;
Santangelo, A.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Weiler, T. J.;
Wiencke, L.
Submitted: 2012-03-15, last modified: 2012-05-28
This document contains a summary of the workshop which took place on 22 - 24
February 2012 at the Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics in the University
of Chicago. The goal of the workshop was to discuss the physics reach of the
JEM-EUSO mission and how best to implement a global ground based calibration
system for the instrument to realize the physics goal of unveiling the origin
of the highest energy cosmic rays.
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.1876 [pdf] - 1077880
Panchromatic Observations of SN 2011dh Point to a Compact Progenitor
Star
Soderberg, Alicia M.;
Margutti, R.;
Zauderer, B. A.;
Krauss, M.;
Katz, B.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Dittmann, J. A.;
Nakar, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Kawai, N.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Toizumi, T.;
Morii, M.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Gurwell, M.;
Petitpas, G.;
Rupen, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Fransson, C.;
Brunthaler, A.;
Bietenholz, M. F.;
Chugai, N.;
Grindlay, J.;
Copete, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Briggs, M.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Rau, A.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2011-07-10, last modified: 2012-05-17
We report the discovery and detailed monitoring of X-ray emission associated
with the Type IIb SN 2011dh using data from the Swift and Chandra satellites,
placing it among the best studied X-ray supernovae to date. We further present
millimeter and radio data obtained with the SMA, CARMA, and EVLA during the
first three weeks after explosion. Combining these observations with early
optical photometry, we show that the panchromatic dataset is well-described by
non-thermal synchrotron emission (radio/mm) with inverse Compton scattering
(X-ray) of a thermal population of optical photons. In this scenario, the shock
partition fractions deviate from equipartition by a factor, (e_e/e_B) ~ 30. We
derive the properties of the shockwave and the circumstellar environment and
find a shock velocity, v~0.1c, and a progenitor mass loss rate of ~6e-5
M_sun/yr. These properties are consistent with the sub-class of Type IIb SNe
characterized by compact progenitors (Type cIIb) and dissimilar from those with
extended progenitors (Type eIIb). Furthermore, we consider the early optical
emission in the context of a cooling envelope model to estimate a progenitor
radius of ~1e+11 cm, in line with the expectations for a Type cIIb SN.
Together, these diagnostics are difficult to reconcile with the extended radius
of the putative yellow supergiant progenitor star identified in archival HST
observations, unless the stellar density profile is unusual. Finally, we
searched for the high energy shock breakout pulse using X-ray and gamma-ray
observations obtained during the purported explosion date range. Based on the
compact radius of the progenitor, we estimate that the breakout pulse was
detectable with current instruments but likely missed due to their limited
temporal/spatial coverage. [Abridged]
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.2363 [pdf] - 563775
SN 2010ay is a Luminous and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova within a
Low-metallicity Host Galaxy
Sanders, Nathan E.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Valenti, S.;
Foley, R. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Berger, E.;
Smartt, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Narayan, G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Terada, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Grav, T.;
Heasley, J. N.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Jedicke, R.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Luppino, G. A.;
Lupton, R. H.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Monet, D. G.;
Morgan, J. S.;
Onaka, P. M.;
Price, P. A.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waterson, M. F.
Submitted: 2011-10-11, last modified: 2012-04-05
We report on our serendipitous pre-discovery detection and detailed follow-up
of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova (SN) 2010ay at z = 0.067 imaged by the
Pan-STARRS1 3pi survey just ~4 days after explosion. The SN had a peak
luminosity, M_R ~ -20.2 mag, significantly more luminous than known GRB-SNe and
one of the most luminous SNe Ib/c ever discovered. The absorption velocity of
SN 2010ay is v_Si ~ 19,000 km/s at ~40 days after explosion, 2-5 times higher
than other broad-lined SNe and similar to the GRB-SN 2010bh at comparable
epochs. Moreover, the velocity declines ~2 times slower than other SNe Ic-BL
and GRB-SNe. Assuming that the optical emission is powered by radioactive
decay, the peak magnitude implies the synthesis of an unusually large mass of
56 Ni, M_Ni = 0.9 M_solar. Modeling of the light-curve points to a total ejecta
mass, M_ej ~ 4.7 M_sol, and total kinetic energy, E_K ~ 11x10^51 ergs. The
ratio of M_Ni to M_ej is ~2 times as large for SN 2010ay as typical GRB-SNe and
may suggest an additional energy reservoir. The metallicity (log(O/H)_PP04 + 12
= 8.19) of the explosion site within the host galaxy places SN 2010ay in the
low-metallicity regime populated by GRB-SNe, and ~0.5(0.2) dex lower than that
typically measured for the host environments of normal (broad-lined) Ic
supernovae. We constrain any gamma-ray emission with E_gamma < 6x10^{48} erg
(25-150 keV) and our deep radio follow-up observations with the Expanded Very
Large Array rule out relativistic ejecta with energy, E > 10^48 erg. We
therefore rule out the association of a relativistic outflow like those which
accompanied SN 1998bw and traditional long-duration GRBs, but place
less-stringent constraints on a weak afterglow like that seen from XRF 060218.
These observations challenge the importance of progenitor metallicity for the
production of a GRB, and suggest that other parameters also play a key role.
[70]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.0010 [pdf] - 1092648
IACT observations of gamma-ray bursts: prospects for the Cherenkov
Telescope Array
Submitted: 2011-12-29, last modified: 2012-03-26
Gamma rays at rest frame energies as high as 90 GeV have been reported from
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). There is
considerable hope that a confirmed GRB detection will be possible with the
upcoming Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA), which will have a larger effective
area and better low-energy sensitivity than current-generation imaging
atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (IACTs). To estimate the likelihood of such a
detection, we have developed a phenomenological model for GRB emission between
1 GeV and 1 TeV that is motivated by the high-energy GRB detections of
Fermi-LAT, and allows us to extrapolate the statistics of GRBs seen by lower
energy instruments such as the Swift-BAT and BATSE on the Compton Gamma-ray
Observatory. We show a number of statistics for detected GRBs, and describe how
the detectability of GRBs with CTA could vary based on a number of parameters,
such as the typical observation delay between the burst onset and the start of
ground observations. We also consider the possibility of using GBM on Fermi as
a finder of GRBs for rapid ground follow-up. While the uncertainty of GBM
localization is problematic, the small field-of-view for IACTs can potentially
be overcome by scanning over the GBM error region. Overall, our results
indicate that CTA should be able to detect one GRB every 20 to 30 months with
our baseline instrument model, assuming consistently rapid pursuit of GRB
alerts, and provided that spectral breaks below 100 GeV are not a common
feature of the bright GRB population. With a more optimistic instrument model,
the detection rate can be as high as 1 to 2 GRBs per year.
[71]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.5534 [pdf] - 480882
Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor Science Highlights
Submitted: 2012-02-24
Three years after the launch of the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, both of
its scientific instruments are operating perfectly and continuing to make
breakthroughs in astrophysics, particle physics, and atmospheric science. I
report here on the highlights of the scientific program of the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM).
[72]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0741 [pdf] - 1116376
Inverse Compton X-ray Emission from Supernovae with Compact Progenitors:
Application to SN2011fe
Margutti, R.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Chevalier, R.;
Hurley, K.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Hughes, J. P.;
Slane, P.;
Fransson, C.;
Moe, M.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Costa, E.;
Cummings, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Enos, H.;
Fellows, C.;
Feroci, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harshman, K.;
Krimm, H.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Makishima, K.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Murakami, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Starr, R.;
Svinkin, D.
Submitted: 2012-02-03
We present a generalized analytic formalism for the inverse Compton X-ray
emission from hydrogen-poor supernovae and apply this framework to SN2011fe
using Swift-XRT, UVOT and Chandra observations. We characterize the optical
properties of SN2011fe in the Swift bands and find them to be broadly
consistent with a "normal" SN Ia, however, no X-ray source is detected by
either XRT or Chandra. We constrain the progenitor system mass loss rate to be
lower than 2x10^-9 M_sun/yr (3sigma c.l.) for wind velocity v_w=100 km/s. Our
result rules out symbiotic binary progenitors for SN2011fe and argues against
Roche-lobe overflowing subgiants and main sequence secondary stars if >1% of
the transferred mass is lost at the Lagrangian points. Regardless of the
density profile, the X-ray non-detections are suggestive of a clean environment
(particle density < 150 cm-3) for (2x10^15<R<5x10^16) cm around the progenitor
site. This is either consistent with the bulk of material being confined within
the binary system or with a significant delay between mass loss and supernova
explosion. We furthermore combine X-ray and radio limits from Chomiuk et al.
2012 to constrain the post shock energy density in magnetic fields. Finally, we
searched for the shock breakout pulse using gamma-ray observations from the
Interplanetary Network and find no compelling evidence for a
supernova-associated burst. Based on the compact radius of the progenitor star
we estimate that the shock break out pulse was likely not detectable by current
satellites.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.3099 [pdf] - 1092977
The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Two Years
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Lichti, Giselher;
Lin, Lin;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2012-01-15
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is designed to enhance the scientific
return from Fermi in studying gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In its first two years
of operation GBM triggered on 491 GRBs. We summarize the criteria used for
triggering and quantify the general characteristics of the triggered GRBs,
including their locations, durations, peak flux, and fluence. This catalog is
an official product of the Fermi GBM science team, and the data files
containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics
Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[74]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.2981 [pdf] - 483399
The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Catalog: The First Two Years
Goldstein, Adam;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Preece, Robert D.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
McGlynn, Sinead;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave
Submitted: 2012-01-13
We present systematic spectral analyses of GRBs detected by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first two years of operation. This
catalog contains two types of spectra extracted from 487 GRBs, and by fitting
four different spectral models, this results in a compendium of over 3800
spectra. The models were selected based on their empirical importance to the
spectral shape of many GRBs, and the analysis performed was devised to be as
thorough and objective as possible. We describe in detail our procedure and
criteria for the analyses, and present the bulk results in the form of
parameter distributions. This catalog should be considered an official product
from the Fermi GBM Science Team, and the data files containing the complete
results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive
Research Center (HEASARC).
[75]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.3779 [pdf] - 439388
Uncovering low-level Fermi/GBM emission using orbital background
subtraction
Submitted: 2011-11-16
The secondary instrument onboard Fermi, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is
an all sky monitor consisting of 14 scintillation detectors. When analysing
transient events such as Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and Solar Flares (SFs) the
background is usually modelled as a polynomial (order 0-4). However, for long
events the background may vary more than can be accounted for with a simple
polynomial. In these cases a more accurate knowledge of GBM's background rates
is required. Here we present an alternative method of both determining the
background and distinguishing low-level emission from the instrumental
background.
[76]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[77]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.5680 [pdf] - 416378
Prospects of GRB observations for CTA from a phenomenological model
Submitted: 2011-09-26
Very high energy (VHE, i.e. $\gtrsim 10$ GeV) photons from Gamma-Ray Bursts
(GRBs), as high as 90 GeV in rest frame energy, have been detected by the
$Fermi$ Large Area Telescope (LAT). This provides hope for a high statistics
GRB detection by a ground-based instrument in the VHE domain. We here report on
our estimates of the expected GRB detection rate and $\gamma$-ray rate (in case
of detection) for the next generation ground-based Imaging Air Cherenkov
Telescopes (IACTs): the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA). Moreover, we
investigated the effect critical design parameters of CTA have on our
predictions and we compare the performance of various observing strategies for
the array pointing. Our estimations are based on a phenomenological model which
uses temporal and spectral information from GRBs detected by $Fermi$-LAT as
well as other instruments operating at lower energy. While detection of VHE
emission from GRBs has eluded ground-based instruments thus far, our results
suggest it should be within reach of CTA with a rate between 0.35 and 1.6
GRBs/year depending on the characteristics of the true GRB population and the
performance that CTA will eventually achieve.
[78]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4064 [pdf] - 1084208
Temporal Deconvolution study of Long and Short Gamma-Ray Burst Light
curves
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Paciesas, William;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burgess, Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty M.;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
McBreen, Sheila;
Preece, Robert;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-09-19
The light curves of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are believed to result from
internal shocks reflecting the activity of the GRB central engine. Their
temporal deconvolution can reveal potential differences in the properties of
the central engines in the two populations of GRBs which are believed to
originate from the deaths of massive stars (long) and from mergers of compact
objects (short). We present here the results of the temporal analysis of 42
GRBs detected with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray
Space Telescope. We deconvolved the profiles into pulses, which we fit with
lognormal functions. The distributions of the pulse shape parameters and
intervals between neighboring pulses are distinct for both burst types and also
fit with lognormal functions. We have studied the evolution of these parameters
in different energy bands and found that they differ between long and short
bursts. We discuss the implications of the differences in the temporal
properties of long and short bursts within the framework of the internal shock
model for GRB prompt emission.
[79]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.4208 [pdf] - 1051604
PTF 10bzf (SN 2010ah): a broad-line Ic supernova discovered by the
Palomar Transient Factory
Corsi, A.;
Ofek, E. O.;
Frail, D. A.;
Poznanski, D.;
Arcavi, I.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Howell, D. A.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Green, Y.;
Murray, D.;
Sullivan, M.;
Xu, D.;
Ben-ami, S.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Law, N. M.;
Nugent, P.;
Quimby, R. M.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Cummings, J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Rau, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Goldsten, J.
Submitted: 2011-01-21, last modified: 2011-08-31
We present the discovery and follow-up observations of a broad-line type-Ic
supernova (SN), PTF 10bzf (SN 2010ah), detected by the Palomar Transient
Factory (PTF) on 2010 February 23. The SN distance is \cong 218 Mpc, greater
than GRB 980425 / SN 1998bw and GRB 060218 / SN 2006aj, but smaller than the
other SNe firmly associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We conducted a
multi-wavelength follow-up campaign with Palomar-48 inch, Palomar 60-inch,
Gemini-N, Keck, Wise, Swift, the Allen Telescope Array, CARMA, WSRT, and EVLA.
Here we compare the properties of PTF 10bzf with those of SN 1998bw and other
broad-line SNe. The optical luminosity and spectral properties of PTF 10bzf
suggest that this SN is intermediate, in kinetic energy and amount of 56Ni,
between non GRB-associated SNe like 2002ap or 1997ef, and GRB-associated SNe
like 1998bw. No X-ray or radio counterpart to PTF 10bzf was detected. X-ray
upper-limits allow us to exclude the presence of an underlying X-ray afterglow
as luminous as that of other SN-associated GRBs like GRB 030329 or GRB 031203.
Early-time radio upper-limits do not show evidence for mildly-relativistic
ejecta. Late-time radio upper-limits rule out the presence of an underlying
off-axis GRB, with energy and wind density similar to the SN-associated GRB
030329 and GRB 031203. Finally, by performing a search for a GRB in the time
window and at the position of PTF 10bzf, we find that no GRB in the IPN catalog
could be associated with this SN.
[80]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.6024 [pdf] - 1579374
Constraints on the Synchrotron Shock Model for the Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray
Burst 090820A
Burgess, J. Michael;
Preece, Robert D.;
Baring, Matthew G.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-07-29
Discerning the radiative dissipation mechanism for prompt emission in
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) requires detailed spectroscopic modeling that straddles
the $\nu F_{\nu}$ peak in the 100 keV - 1 MeV range. Historically, empirical
fits such as the popular Band function have been employed with considerable
success in interpreting the observations. While extrapolations of the Band
parameters can provide some physical insight into the emission mechanisms
responsible for GRBs, these inferences do not provide a unique way of
discerning between models. By fitting physical models directly this degeneracy
can be broken, eliminating the need for empirical functions; our analysis here
offers a first step in this direction. One of the oldest, and leading,
theoretical ideas for the production of the prompt signal is the synchrotron
shock model (SSM). Here we explore the applicability of this model to a bright
{\it Fermi} GBM burst with a simple temporal structure, GRB {\it 090820}A. Our
investigation implements, for the first time, thermal and non-thermal
synchrotron emissivities in the RMFIT forward-folding spectral analysis
software often used in GBM burst studies. We find that these synchrotron
emissivities, together with a blackbody shape, provide at least as good a match
with the data as the Band GRB spectral fitting function. This success is
achieved in both time-integrated and time-resolved spectral fits.
[81]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.2399 [pdf] - 1077924
Quasi-Periodic Pulsations in Solar Flares: new clues from the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Gruber, D.;
Lachowicz, P.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Greiner, J.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Kanbach, G.;
Rau, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Diehl, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.
Submitted: 2011-07-12, last modified: 2011-07-17
In the last four decades it has been observed that solar flares show
quasi-periodic pulsations (QPPs) from the lowest, i.e. radio, to the highest,
i.e. gamma-ray, part of the electromagnetic spectrum. To this day, it is still
unclear which mechanism creates such QPPs. In this paper, we analyze four
bright solar flares which show compelling signatures of quasi-periodic behavior
and were observed with the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (\gbm) onboard the Fermi
satellite. Because GBM covers over 3 decades in energy (8 keV to 40 MeV) it can
be a key instrument to understand the physical processes which drive solar
flares. We tested for periodicity in the time series of the solar flares
observed by GBM by applying a classical periodogram analysis. However, contrary
to previous authors, we did not detrend the raw light curve before creating the
power spectral density spectrum (PSD). To assess the significance of the
frequencies we made use of a method which is commonly applied for X-ray
binaries and Seyfert galaxies. This technique takes into account the underlying
continuum of the PSD which for all of these sources has a P(f) ~ f^{-\alpha}
dependence and is typically labeled red-noise. We checked the reliability of
this technique by applying it to a solar flare which was observed by the Reuven
Ramaty High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) which contains, besides
any potential periodicity from the Sun, a 4 s rotational period due to the
rotation of the spacecraft around its axis. While we do not find an intrinsic
solar quasi-periodic pulsation we do reproduce the instrumental periodicity.
Moreover, with the method adopted here, we do not detect significant QPPs in
the four bright solar flares observed by GBM. We stress that for the purpose of
such kind of analyses it is of uttermost importance to appropriately account
for the red-noise component in the PSD of these astrophysical sources.
[82]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.0175 [pdf] - 1077009
The Fermi view of gamma-ray bursts
Submitted: 2011-06-01
Since its successful launch in June 2008, the {\it Fermi} Gamma-ray Space
Telescope has made important breakthroughs in the understanding of the
Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) phenomemon. The combination of the GBM and the LAT
instruments onboard the {\it Fermi} observatory has provided a wealth of
information from its observations of GRBs over seven decades in energy. We
present brief descriptions of the {\it Fermi} instruments and their
capabilities for GRB science, and report highlights from {\it Fermi}
observations of high-energy prompt and extended GRB emission. The main physical
implications of these results are discussed, along with open questions
regarding GRB modelling. We emphasize future synergies with ground-based
\v{C}erenkov telescopes at the time of the SVOM mission.
[83]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.5495 [pdf] - 1076293
Rest-frame properties of 32 gamma-ray bursts observed by the Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Gruber, D.;
Greiner, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Goldstein, A.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Nardini, M.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Burgess, J. M.;
Chaplin, V. L.;
Diehl, R.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Fitzpatrick, G.;
Foley, S.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Guiriec, S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Lin, L.;
McBreen, S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Tierney, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.
Submitted: 2011-04-28, last modified: 2011-05-03
Aims: In this paper we study the main spectral and temporal properties of
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed by Fermi/GBM. We investigate these key
properties of GRBs in the rest-frame of the progenitor and test for possible
intra-parameter correlations to better understand the intrinsic nature of these
events. Methods: Our sample comprises 32 GRBs with measured redshift that were
observed by GBM until August 2010. 28 of them belong to the long-duration
population and 4 events were classified as short/hard bursts. For all of these
events we derive, where possible, the intrinsic peak energy in the $\nu
F_{\nu}$ spectrum (\eprest), the duration in the rest-frame, defined as the
time in which 90% of the burst fluence was observed (\tninetyrest) and the
isotropic equivalent bolometric energy (\eiso). Results: The distribution of
\eprest has mean and median values of 1.1 MeV and 750 keV, respectively. A
log-normal fit to the sample of long bursts peaks at ~800 keV. No high-\ep
population is found but the distribution is biased against low \ep values. We
find the lowest possible \ep that GBM can recover to be ~ 15 keV. The
\tninetyrest distribution of long GRBs peaks at ~10 s. The distribution of
\eiso has mean and median values of $8.9\times 10^{52}$ erg and $8.2 \times
10^{52}$ erg, respectively. We confirm the tight correlation between \eprest
and \eiso (Amati relation) and the one between \eprest and the 1-s peak
luminosity ($L_p$) (Yonetoku relation). Additionally, we observe a parameter
reconstruction effect, i.e. the low-energy power law index $\alpha$ gets softer
when \ep is located at the lower end of the detector energy range. Moreover, we
do not find any significant cosmic evolution of neither \eprest nor
\tninetyrest.
[84]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.2818 [pdf] - 1017135
The High-Metallicity Explosion Environment of the Relativistic Supernova
2009bb
Levesque, E. M.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Foley, R. J.;
Berger, E.;
Kewley, L. J.;
Chakraborti, S.;
Ray, A.;
Torres, M. A. P.;
Challis, P.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Bietenholz, M. F.;
Chandra, P.;
Chaplin, V.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Chugai, N.;
Connaughton, V.;
Copete, A.;
Fox, O.;
Fransson, C.;
Grindlay, J. E.;
Hamuy, M. A.;
Milne, P. A.;
Pignata, G.;
Stritzinger, M. D.;
Wieringa, M. H.
Submitted: 2009-08-19, last modified: 2011-04-29
We investigate the environment of the nearby (d ~ 40Mpc) broad-lined Type Ic
supernova SN 2009bb. This event was observed to produce a relativistic outflow
likely powered by a central accreting compact object. While such a phenomenon
was previously observed only in long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs), no LGRB
was detected in association with SN 2009bb. Using an optical spectrum of the SN
2009bb explosion site, we determine a variety of ISM properties for the host
environment, including metallicity, young stellar population age, and star
formation rate. We compare the SN explosion site properties to observations of
LGRB and broad-lined SN Ic host environments on optical emission line ratio
diagnostic diagrams. Based on these analyses, we find that the SN 2009bb
explosion site has a very high metallicity of ~2x solar, in agreement with
other broad-lined SN Ic host environments and at odds with the low-redshift
LGRB host environments and recently proposed maximum metallicity limits for
relativistic explosions. We consider the implications of these findings and the
impact that SN 2009bb's unusual explosive properties and environment have on
our understanding of the key physical ingredient that enables some SNe to
produce a relativistic outflow.
[85]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4079 [pdf] - 1941794
Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts from Six Magnetars
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acerneseac, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G. S.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Amin, R. S.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Antonuccia, F.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astonea, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S.;
Baroneac, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barriga, P.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Bastiab, A.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauera, Th. S.;
Behnke, B.;
Bekera, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belletoile, A.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birindellia, S.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossia, M.;
Bizouarda, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Bloma, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondub, F.;
Bonelliab, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschia, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosia, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Boyle, M.;
Braccinia, S.;
Bradaschiaa, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brilleta, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brissona, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brummit, A.;
Budzyńskib, R.;
Bulikbc, T.;
Bultenab, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnolia, G.;
Cain, J.;
Calloniab, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campagnaab, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavaliera, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cellaa, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarinib, E.;
Chaibia, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chalkley, E.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Clevaa, F.;
Cocciaab, E.;
Colacinoab, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Collaab, A.;
Colombinib, M.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsia, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulona, J. -P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Culter, R. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonioa, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Das, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Daviera, M.;
Davies, G.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosaab, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
del Preteac, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiorea, L.;
Di Lietoab, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilioac, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilioa, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Dorsher, S.;
Douglas, E. S. D.;
Dragocd, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafoneab, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferranteab, I.;
Fidecaroab, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fortea, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fourniera, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frascaab, S.;
Frasconia, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoniab, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garofoli, J. A.;
Garufiab, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennaia, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazottoa, A.;
Gill, C.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greveriea, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidiab, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hage, B.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayaub, J. -F.;
Hayler, T.;
Heefner, J.;
Heitmann, H.;
Helloa, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Jaranowskid, P.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kells, W.;
Kelner, M.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, N.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kopparapu, R.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalskab, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królakae, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Leong, J.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroya, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Lia, T. G. F.;
Liguoriab, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzinia, M.;
Lorietteb, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdoa, G.;
Lu, P.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majoranaa, E.;
Maksimovicb, I.;
Mana, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovaniac, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesonia, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelliab, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
Meadors, G.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merill, L.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milanoab, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkova, Y.;
Mino, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Moesta, P.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgiaab, A.;
Moscaab, S.;
Moscatellia, V.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nash, T.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Neriab, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oldenburg, R. G.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Pagliaroliac, G.;
Palladinoac, L.;
Palombaa, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paolettia, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parameswaran, A.;
Pardiab, S.;
Parisiab, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquietiab, R.;
Passuelloa, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pathak, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Peralta, C.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichettiab, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichota, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanniab, F.;
Pietkad, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Podkaminer, J.;
Poggianiab, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodiab, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturoa, M.;
Puppoa, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabelingab, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C. R.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnaniab, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Reab, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbaua, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricciab, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Roberts, P.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robineta, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchia, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romanoac, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińskacf, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sakata, S.;
Sakosky, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Salit, M.;
Sammut, L.;
de la Jordana, L. Sancho;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Saraf, S.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Satterthwaite, M.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Searle, A. C.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Weerathunga, T. Shihan;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandioab, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturaniab, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szokoly, G. P.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Titsler, C.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toncelliab, A.;
Tonelliab, M.;
Torreac, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travassoab, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trias, M.;
Tseng, K.;
Turner, L.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urbanek, K.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vaishnav, B.;
Vajenteab, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brandab, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Puttena, S.;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidisa, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovatoc, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetranoab, F.;
Viceréab, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vineta, J. -Y.;
Voccaa, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Wasa, M.;
Wei, P.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wen, S.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, H. R.;
Williams, L.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, Z.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Boynton, W. V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cline, T. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J. O;
Golovin, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Kaneko, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Lin, L.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Ohno, M.;
Palshin, V. D.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Terada, Y.;
Yamaoka, K.
Submitted: 2010-11-17, last modified: 2011-04-15
Soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are thought to
be magnetars: neutron stars powered by extreme magnetic fields. These rare
objects are characterized by repeated and sometimes spectacular gamma-ray
bursts. The burst mechanism might involve crustal fractures and excitation of
non-radial modes which would emit gravitational waves (GWs). We present the
results of a search for GW bursts from six galactic magnetars that is sensitive
to neutron star f-modes, thought to be the most efficient GW emitting
oscillatory modes in compact stars. One of them, SGR 0501+4516, is likely ~1
kpc from Earth, an order of magnitude closer than magnetars targeted in
previous GW searches. A second, AXP 1E 1547.0-5408, gave a burst with an
estimated isotropic energy >10^{44} erg which is comparable to the giant
flares. We find no evidence of GWs associated with a sample of 1279
electromagnetic triggers from six magnetars occurring between November 2006 and
June 2009, in GW data from the LIGO, Virgo, and GEO600 detectors. Our lowest
model-dependent GW emission energy upper limits for band- and time-limited
white noise bursts in the detector sensitive band, and for f-mode ringdowns (at
1090 Hz), are 3.0x10^{44} d_1^2 erg and 1.4x10^{47} d_1^2 erg respectively,
where d_1 = d_{0501} / 1 kpc and d_{0501} is the distance to SGR 0501+4516.
These limits on GW emission from f-modes are an order of magnitude lower than
any previous, and approach the range of electromagnetic energies seen in SGR
giant flares for the first time.
[86]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.2679 [pdf] - 300664
When A Standard Candle Flickers
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Baumgartner, Wayne H.;
Beklen, Elif;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Camero-Arranz, Ascension;
Case, Gary L.;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Finger, Mark H.;
Gehrels, Neil;
Greiner, Jochen;
Jahoda, Keith;
Jenke, Peter;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Krimm, Hans A.;
Kuulkers, Erik;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Natalucci, Lorenzo;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
Rodi, James C.;
Shaposhnikov, Nikolai;
Skinner, Gerald K.;
Swartz, Doug;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Diehl, Roland;
Zhang, Xiao-Ling
Submitted: 2010-10-13, last modified: 2011-02-03
The Crab Nebula is the only hard X-ray source in the sky that is both bright
enough and steady enough to be easily used as a standard candle. As a result,
it has been used as a normalization standard by most X-ray/gamma ray
telescopes. Although small-scale variations in the nebula are well-known, since
the start of science operations of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) in
August 2008, a ~ 7% (70 mcrab) decline has been observed in the overall Crab
Nebula flux in the 15 - 50 keV band, measured with the Earth occultation
technique. This decline is independently confirmed with three other
instruments: the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (Swift/BAT), the Rossi X-ray
Timing Explorer Proportional Counter Array (RXTE/PCA), and the INTErnational
Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory Imager on Board INTEGRAL (IBIS). A similar
decline is also observed in the ~3 - 15 keV data from the RXTE/PCA and INTEGRAL
Joint European Monitor (JEM-X) and in the 50 - 100 keV band with GBM and
INTEGRAL/IBIS. Observations from 100 to 500 keV with GBM suggest that the
decline may be larger at higher energies. The pulsed flux measured with
RXTE/PCA since 1999 is consistent with the pulsar spin-down, indicating that
the observed changes are nebular. Correlated variations in the Crab Nebula flux
on a ~3 year timescale are also seen independently with the PCA, BAT, and IBIS
from 2005 to 2008, with a flux minimum in April 2007. As of August 2010, the
current flux has declined below the 2007 minimum.
[87]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.3325 [pdf] - 1051490
First-year Results of Broadband Spectroscopy of the Brightest Fermi-GBM
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Lichti, Giselher;
Bhat, P. N.;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Goldstein, Adam;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kippen, Marc;
Lin, Lin;
McBreen, Sheila;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-01-17
We present here our results of the temporal and spectral analysis of a sample
of 52 bright and hard gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed with the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first year of operation (July 2008-July 2009).
Our sample was selected from a total of 253 GBM GRBs based on each event peak
count rate measured between 0.2 and 40MeV. The final sample comprised 34 long
and 18 short GRBs. These numbers show that the GBM sample contains a much
larger fraction of short GRBs, than the CGRO/BATSE data set, which we explain
as the result of our (different) selection criteria and the improved GBM
trigger algorithms, which favor collection of short, bright GRBs over BATSE. A
first by-product of our selection methodology is the determination of a
detection threshold from the GBM data alone, above which GRBs most likely will
be detected in the MeV/GeV range with the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard
Fermi. This predictor will be very useful for future multiwavelength GRB follow
ups with ground and space based observatories. Further we have estimated the
burst durations up to 10MeV and for the first time expanded the duration-energy
relationship in the GRB light curves to high energies. We confirm that GRB
durations decline with energy as a power law with index approximately -0.4, as
was found earlier with the BATSE data and we also notice evidence of a possible
cutoff or break at higher energies. Finally, we performed time-integrated
spectral analysis of all 52 bursts and compared their spectral parameters with
those obtained with the larger data sample of the BATSE data. We find that the
two parameter data sets are similar and confirm that short GRBs are in general
harder than longer ones.
[88]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2458 [pdf] - 956040
A New Derivation of GRB Jet Opening Angles from the Prompt Gamma-Ray
Emission
Goldstein, Adam;
Preece, Robert D.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
McBreen, Sheila;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Paciesas, William S.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burgess, J. Michael;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Fitzpatrick, Gerard;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
Guiriec, Sylvain;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2011-01-12
The jet opening angle of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is an important parameter
for determining the characteristics of the progenitor, and the information
contained in the opening angle gives insight into the relativistic outflow and
the total energy that is contained in the burst. Unfortunately, a confident
inference of the jet opening angle usually requires broadband measurement of
the afterglow of the GRB, from the X-ray down to the radio and from minutes to
days after the prompt gamma-ray emission, which may be difficult to obtain. For
this reason, very few of all detected GRBs have constrained jet angles. We
present an alternative approach to derive jet opening angles from the prompt
emission of the GRB, given that the GRB has a measurable Epeak and fluence, and
which does not require any afterglow measurements. We present the distribution
of derived jet opening angles for the first two years of the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM) operation, and we compare a number of our derived opening
angles to the reported opening angles using the traditional afterglow method.
We derive the collimation-corrected gamma-ray energy, E_{\gamma}, for GRBs with
redshift and find that some of the GRBs in our sample are inconsistent with a
proto-magnetar progenitor. Finally, we show that the use of the derived jet
opening angles results in a tighter correlation between the rest-frame Epeak
and E_{\gamma} than has previously been presented, which places long GRBs and
short GRBs onto one empirical power law.
[89]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.1099 [pdf] - 1042912
Fermi/GBM observations of the ultra-long GRB 091024: A burst with an
optical flash
Gruber, D.;
Krühler, T.;
Foley, S.;
Nardini, M.;
Burlon, D.;
Rau, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
von Kienlin, A.;
McBreen, S.;
Greiner, J.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burgess, J. M.;
Chaplin, V. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Diehl, R.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Guiriec, S.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Lin, L.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Tierney, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C.
Submitted: 2011-01-05
In this paper we examine gamma-ray and optical data of GRB 091024, a
gamma-ray burst (GRB) with an extremely long duration of T90~1020 s, as
observed with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). We present spectral
analysis of all three distinct emission episodes using data from Fermi/GBM.
Because of the long nature of this event, many ground-based optical telescopes
slewed to its location within a few minutes and thus were able to observe the
GRB during its active period. We compare the optical and gamma-ray light
curves. Furthermore, we estimate a lower limit on the bulk Lorentz factor from
the variability and spectrum of the GBM light curve and compare it with that
obtained from the peak time of the forward shock of the optical afterglow. From
the spectral analysis we note that, despite its unusually long duration, this
burst is similar to other long GRBs, i.e. there is spectral evolution (both the
peak energy and the spectral index vary with time) and spectral lags are
measured. We find that the optical light curve is highly anti-correlated to the
prompt gamma-ray emission, with the optical emission reaching the maximum
during an epoch of quiescence in the prompt emission. We interpret this
behavior as the reverse shock (optical flash), expected in the
internal-external shock model of GRB emission but observed only in a handful of
GRBs so far. The lower limit on the initial Lorentz factor deduced from the
variability time scale ($\Gamma_{min}=195_{-110}^+{90}$)is consistent within
the error to the one obtained using the peak time of the forward shock
($\Gamma_0=120$) and is also consistent with Lorentz factors of other long
GRBs.
[90]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.4601 [pdf] - 289034
Detection of a Thermal Spectral Component in the Prompt Emission of GRB
100724B
Guiriec, Sylvain;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Burgess, Michael;
Ryde, Felix;
Daigne, Frédéric;
Mészáros, Peter;
Goldstein, Adam;
McEnery, Julie;
Omodei, Nicola;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Camero-Arranz, Ascensión;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Foley, Suzanne;
Gibby, Melissa;
Giles, Misty M.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Gruber, David;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William;
Preece, Robert;
Rau, Arne;
Tierney, Dave;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2010-10-21, last modified: 2010-11-30
Observations of GRB 100724B with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) find
that the spectrum is dominated by the typical Band functional form, which is
usually taken to represent a non-thermal emission component, but also includes
a statistically highly significant thermal spectral contribution. The
simultaneous observation of the thermal and non-thermal components allows us to
confidently identify the two emission components. The fact that these seem to
vary independently favors the idea that the thermal component is of
photospheric origin while the dominant non-thermal emission occurs at larger
radii. Our results imply either a very high efficiency for the non-thermal
process, or a very small size of the region at the base of the flow, both quite
challenging for the standard fireball model. These problems are resolved if the
jet is initially highly magnetized and has a substantial Poynting flux.
[91]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.4953 [pdf] - 1040832
First Results from Fermi GBM Earth Occultation Monitoring: Observations
of Soft Gamma-Ray Sources Above 100 keV
Case, Gary L.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Rodi, James C.;
Jenke, Peter;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Finger, Mark H.;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Camero-Arranz, Ascencion;
Beklen, Elif;
Bhat, P. Narayan;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert;
Kippen, R. Marc;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Griener, Jochen
Submitted: 2010-09-24
The NaI and BGO detectors on the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on Fermi are
now being used for long-term monitoring of the hard X-ray/low energy gamma-ray
sky. Using the Earth occultation technique as demonstrated previously by the
BATSE instrument on the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory, GBM can be used to
produce multiband light curves and spectra for known sources and transient
outbursts in the 8 keV to 1 MeV energy range with its NaI detectors and up to
40 MeV with its BGO detectors. Over 85% of the sky is viewed every orbit, and
the precession of the Fermi orbit allows the entire sky to be viewed every ~26
days with sensitivity exceeding that of BATSE at energies below ~25 keV and
above ~1.5 MeV. We briefly describe the technique and present preliminary
results using the NaI detectors after the first two years of observations at
energies above 100 keV. Eight sources are detected with a significance greater
than 7 sigma: the Crab, Cyg X-1, SWIFT J1753.5-0127, 1E 1740-29, Cen A, GRS
1915+105, and the transient sources XTE J1752-223 and GX 339-4. Two of the
sources, the Crab and Cyg X-1, have also been detected above 300 keV.
[92]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.2817 [pdf] - 1017134
A Relativistic Type Ibc Supernova Without a Detected Gamma-ray Burst
Soderberg, A. M.;
Chakraborti, S.;
Pignata, G.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Chandra, P.;
Ray, A.;
Wieringa, M. H.;
Copete, A.;
Chaplin, V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Bietenholz, M. F.;
Chugai, N.;
Stritzinger, M. D.;
Hamuy, M.;
Fransson, C.;
Fox, O.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Grindlay, J. E.;
Challis, P.;
Foley, R. J.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Milne, P. A.;
Torres, M. A. P.
Submitted: 2009-08-20, last modified: 2010-01-26
Long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) mark the explosive death of some
massive stars and are a rare sub-class of Type Ibc supernovae (SNe Ibc). They
are distinguished by the production of an energetic and collimated relativistic
outflow powered by a central engine (an accreting black hole or neutron star).
Observationally, this outflow is manifested in the pulse of gamma-rays and a
long-lived radio afterglow. To date, central engine-driven SNe have been
discovered exclusively through their gamma-ray emission, yet it is expected
that a larger population goes undetected due to limited satellite sensitivity
or beaming of the collimated emission away from our line-of-sight. In this
framework, the recovery of undetected GRBs may be possible through radio
searches for SNe Ibc with relativistic outflows. Here we report the discovery
of luminous radio emission from the seemingly ordinary Type Ibc SN 2009bb,
which requires a substantial relativistic outflow powered by a central engine.
The lack of a coincident GRB makes SN 2009bb the first engine-driven SN
discovered without a detected gamma-ray signal. A comparison with our extensive
radio survey of SNe Ibc reveals that the fraction harboring central engines is
low, ~1 percent, measured independently from, but consistent with, the inferred
rate of nearby GRBs. Our study demonstrates that upcoming optical and radio
surveys will soon rival gamma-ray satellites in pinpointing the nearest
engine-driven SNe. A similar result for a different supernova is reported
independently.
[93]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.5544 [pdf] - 1018545
Discovery of a new Soft Gamma Repeater: SGR J0418+5729
van der Horst, A. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Gogus, E.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Wachter, S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Granot, J.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Woods, P. M.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J. R.;
Finger, M. H.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gelino, C. R.;
Gelino, D. M.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mazets, E. P.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
van der Klis, M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Watts, A. L.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2009-11-30, last modified: 2010-01-19
On 2009 June 5, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray
Space Telescope triggered on two short, and relatively dim bursts with spectral
properties similar to Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts. Independent
localizations of the bursts by triangulation with the Konus-RF and with the
Swift satellite, confirmed their origin from the same, previously unknown,
source. The subsequent discovery of X-ray pulsations with the Rossi X-ray
Timing Explorer (RXTE), confirmed the magnetar nature of the new source, SGR
J0418+5729. We describe here the Fermi/GBM observations, the discovery and the
localization of this new SGR, and our infrared and Chandra X-ray observations.
We also present a detailed temporal and spectral study of the two GBM bursts.
SGR J0418+5729 is the second source discovered in the same region of the sky in
the last year, the other one being SGR J0501+4516. Both sources lie in the
direction of the galactic anti-center and presumably at the nearby distance of
~2 kpc (assuming they reside in the Perseus arm of our galaxy). The
near-threshold GBM detection of bursts from SGR J0418+5729 suggests that there
may be more such dim SGRs throughout our galaxy, possibly exceeding the
population of bright SGRs. Finally, using sample statistics, we conclude that
the implications of the new SGR discovery on the number of observable active
magnetars in our galaxy at any given time is <10, in agreement with our earlier
estimates.
[94]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0955 [pdf] - 32503
Observations of Soft Gamma Ray Sources >100 keV Using Earth Occultation
with GBM
Case, Gary L.;
Cherry, Michael L.;
Rodi, James;
Camero-Arranz, Ascencion;
Belken, Elef;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Jenke, Peter;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Chaplin, Vandiver;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Preece, Rob;
Finger, Mark H.
Submitted: 2010-01-06
The NaI and BGO detectors on the Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on Fermi are
now being used for long term monitoring of the hard X-ray/low energy gamma ray
sky. Using the Earth occultation technique demonstrated previously by the BATSE
instrument on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, GBM produces multiband light
curves and spectra for known sources and transient outbursts in the 8 keV - 1
MeV band with its NaI detectors and up to 40 MeV with its BGO. Coverage of the
entire sky is obtained every two orbits, with sensitivity exceeding that of
BATSE at energies below ~25 keV and above ~1.5 MeV. We describe the technique
and present preliminary results after the first ~17 months of observations at
energies above 100 keV. Seven sources are detected: the Crab, Cyg X-1, Swift
J1753.5-0127, 1E 1740-29, Cen A, GRS 1915+105, and the transient source XTE
J1752-223.
[95]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[96]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.3847 [pdf] - 32026
Long-term Monitoring of Accreting Pulsars with Fermi GBM
Finger, Mark H.;
Beklen, Elif;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Paciesas, William S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Buckley, David A. H.;
Camero-Arranz, Ascension;
Coe, Malcolm J.;
Jenke, Peter;
Kanbach, Gottfried;
Negueruela, Ignacio;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2009-12-18
Using the Gamma ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on Fermi we are monitoring accreting
pulsar systems. We use the rates from GBM's 12 NaI detectors in the 8-50 keV
range to detect and monitor pulsations with periods between 0.5 and 1000
seconds. After discussing our analysis approach we present results for
individual sources from the first year of monitoring. Updated figures for these
and other sources are available at
http://gammaray.nsstc.nasa.gov/gbm/science/pulsars/ .
[97]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.3831 [pdf] - 32021
All-Sky Earth Occultation Observations with the Fermi Gamma Ray Burst
Monitor
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.;
Beklen, E.;
Bhat, P. N;
Briggs, M. S.;
Chaplin, V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Camero-Arranz, A.;
Case, G.;
Cherry, M.;
Rodi, J.;
Finger, M. H.;
Jenke, P.;
Haynes, R. H.
Submitted: 2009-12-18
Using the Gamma Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on-board Fermi, we are monitoring the
hard X-ray/soft gamma ray sky using the Earth occultation technique. Each time
a source in our catalog enters or exits occultation by the Earth, we measure
its flux using the change in count rates due to the occultation. Currently we
are using CTIME data with 8 energy channels spanning 8 keV to 1 MeV for the GBM
NaI detectors and spanning 150 keV to 40 MeV for the GBM BGO detectors. Our
preliminary catalog consists of galactic X-ray binaries, the Crab Nebula, and
active galactic nuclei. In addition, to Earth occultations, we have observed
numerous occultations with Fermi's solar panels. We will present early results.
Regularly updated results can be found on our website
http://gammaray.nsstc.nasa.gov/gbm/science/occultation
[98]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.0450 [pdf] - 1003263
The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Meegan, Charles;
Lichti, Giselher;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald;
Greiner, Jochen;
Hoover, Andrew S.;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Preece, Robert;
Steinle, Helmut;
Wallace, Mark S.;
Wilson, Robert B.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2009-08-04
The Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) will significantly augment the science
return from the Fermi Observatory in the study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). The
primary objective of GBM is to extend the energy range over which bursts are
observed downward from the energy range of the Large Area Telescope (LAT) on
Fermi into the hard X-ray range where extensive previous data exist. A
secondary objective is to compute burst locations on-board to allow
re-orientiong the spacecraft so that the LAT can observe delayed emission from
bright bursts. GBM uses an array of twelve sodium iodide scintillators and two
bismuth germanate scintillators to detect gamma rays from ~8 keV to ~40 MeV
over the full unocculted sky. The on-board trigger threshold is ~0.7
photons/cm2/s (50-300 keV, 1 s peak). GBM generates on-board triggers for ~250
GRBs per year.
[99]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.4578 [pdf] - 26697
Multi-wavelength observations of the energetic GRB 080810: detailed
mapping of the broadband spectral evolution
Page, K. L.;
Willingale, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Holland, S. T.;
McBreen, S.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Prochaska, J. X.;
Rol, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Wiersema, K.;
Zhang, B.;
Aceituno, F. J.;
Akerlof, C.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Evans, P. A.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Gehrels, N.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Howard, A. W.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Pagani, C.;
Preece, R.;
Perley, D.;
Yuan, F.
Submitted: 2009-07-27
GRB 080810 was one of the first bursts to trigger both Swift and the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope. It was subsequently monitored over the X-ray and
UV/optical bands by Swift, in the optical by ROTSE and a host of other
telescopes and was detected in the radio by the VLA. The redshift of z= 3.355
+/- 0.005 was determined by Keck/HIRES and confirmed by RTT150 and NOT. The
prompt gamma/X-ray emission, detected over 0.3-10^3 keV, systematically softens
over time, with E_peak moving from ~600 keV at the start to ~40 keV around 100
s after the trigger; alternatively, this spectral evolution could be identified
with the blackbody temperature of a quasithermal model shifting from ~60 keV to
~3 keV over the same time interval. The first optical detection was made at 38
s, but the smooth, featureless profile of the full optical coverage implies
that this originated from the afterglow component, not the pulsed/flaring
prompt emission.
Broadband optical and X-ray coverage of the afterglow at the start of the
final X-ray decay (~8 ks) reveals a spectral break between the optical and
X-ray bands in the range 10^15 - 2x10^16 Hz. The decay profiles of the X-ray
and optical bands show that this break initially migrates blueward to this
frequency and then subsequently drifts redward to below the optical band by
~3x10^5 s. GRB 080810 was very energetic, with an isotropic energy output for
the prompt component of 3x10^53 erg and 1.6x10^52 erg for the afterglow; there
is no evidence for a jet break in the afterglow up to six days following the
burst.
[100]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.0991 [pdf] - 901454
Prospects for GRB Science with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
Band, D. L.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Baring, M. G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Battelino, M.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bonnel, J.;
Chiang, J.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cutini, S.;
de Palma, F.;
Dingus, B. L.;
Silva, E. do Couto e;
Fishman, G.;
Galli, A.;
Gehrels, N.;
Giglietto, N.;
Granot, J.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hughes, R. E.;
Kamae, T.;
Komin, N.;
Kuehn, F.;
Kuss, M.;
Longo, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
McEnery, J. E.;
McGlynn, S.;
Moretti, E.;
Nakamori, T.;
Norris, J. P.;
Ohno, M.;
Olivo, M.;
Omodei, N.;
Pelassa, V.;
Piron, F.;
Preece, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Russell, J. J.;
Ryde, F.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Scargle, J. D.;
Sgrò, C.;
Shimokawabe, T.;
Smith, P. D.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Winer, B. L.;
Yamazaki, R.
Submitted: 2009-06-04
The LAT instrument on the Fermi mission will reveal the rich spectral and
temporal gamma-ray burst phenomena in the > 100 MeV band. The synergy with
Fermi's GBM detectors will link these observations to those in the well
explored 10-1000 keV range; the addition of the > 100 MeV band observations
will resolve theoretical uncertainties about burst emission in both the prompt
and afterglow phases. Trigger algorithms will be applied to the LAT data both
onboard the spacecraft and on the ground. The sensitivity of these triggers
will differ because of the available computing resources onboard and on the
ground. Here we present the LAT's burst detection methodologies and the
instrument's GRB capabilities.
[101]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.3466 [pdf] - 21578
What Are Gamma-Ray Bursts -- The Unique Role of Very High Energy
Gamma-Ray Observations
Williams, D. A.;
Falcone, A. D.;
Baring, M. G.;
Buckley, J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Coppi, P.;
Dermer, C.;
Digel, S.;
Dingus, B.;
Fryer, C.;
Gehrels, N.;
Granot, J.;
Horan, D.;
Katz, J. I.;
Meszaros, P.;
Norris, J.;
Parkinson, P. Saz;
Pe'er, A.;
Razzaque, S.;
Sinnis, G.;
Wang, X. Y.;
Weekes, T. C.;
Zhang, B.
Submitted: 2009-02-19
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been an enigma since their discovery forty years
ago. However, considerable progress unraveling their mysteries has been made in
recent years. Developments in observations, theory, and instrumentation have
prepared the way so that the next decade can be the one in which we finally
answer the question, "What are gamma-ray bursts?" This question encompasses not
only what the progenitors are that produce the GRBs, but also how the enormous
luminosity of the GRBs, concentrated in gamma rays, is achieved. Observations
across the electromagnetic spectrum, from both the ground and space, will be
required to fully tackle this important question. This white paper, mostly
distilled from a recent study commissioned by the Division of Astrophysics of
the American Physical Society, focuses on what very high energy (~100 GeV and
above) gamma-ray observations can contribute. Very high energy gamma rays probe
the most extreme high energy particle populations in the burst environment,
testing models of lepton and proton acceleration in GRBs and constraining the
bulk Lorentz factor and opacity of the outflow. Sensitivity improvements of
more than an order of magnitude in the very high energy gamma-ray band can be
achieved early in the next decade, in order to contribute to this science.
[102]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.2908 [pdf] - 19533
Ground-based calibration and characterization of the Fermi Gamma-Ray
Burst Monitor Detectors
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Steinle, Helmut;
Bhat, P. Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Hoover, Andrew S.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Krumrey, Michael;
Gerlach, Martin;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Greiner, Jochen;
van der Horst, Alexander J.;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
McBreen, Sheila;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2008-12-16
One of the scientific objectives of NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope is
the study of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
was designed to detect and localize bursts for the Fermi mission. By means of
an array of 12 NaI(Tl) (8 keV to 1 MeV) and two BGO (0.2 to 40 MeV)
scintillation detectors, GBM extends the energy range (20 MeV to > 300 GeV) of
Fermi's main instrument, the Large Area Telescope, into the traditional range
of current GRB databases. The physical detector response of the GBM instrument
to GRBs is determined with the help of Monte Carlo simulations, which are
supported and verified by on-ground individual detector calibration
measurements. We present the principal instrument properties, which have been
determined as a function of energy and angle, including the channel-energy
relation, the energy resolution, the effective area and the spatial
homogeneity.
[103]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.0520 [pdf] - 17040
Gamma Ray Burst Section of the White Paper on the Status and Future of
Ground-based TeV Gamma-ray Astronomy
Falcone, A. D.;
Williams, D. A.;
Baring, M. G.;
Blandford, R.;
Buckley, J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Coppi, P.;
Dermer, C.;
Dingus, B.;
Fryer, C.;
Gehrels, N.;
Granot, J.;
Horan, D.;
Katz, J. I.;
Kuehn, K.;
Meszaros, P.;
Norris, J.;
Parkinson, P. Saz;
Pe'er, A.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Razzaque, S.;
Wang, X. Y.;
Zhang, B.
Submitted: 2008-10-02
This is a report on the findings of the gamma ray burst working group for the
white paper on the status and future of TeV gamma-ray astronomy. The white
paper is an APS commissioned document, and the overall version has also been
released and can be found on astro-ph. This detailed section of the white paper
discusses the status of past and current attempts to observe gamma ray bursts
at GeV-TeV energies. We concentrate on the potential of future ground-based
gamma-ray experiments to observe the highest energy emission ever recorded for
GRBs, particularly for those that are nearby and have high Lorentz factors in
the GRB jet. It is clear that major advances are possible and that the
detection of very high energy emission would have strong implications for GRB
models, as well as cosmic ray origin.
[104]
oai:arXiv.org:0804.2256 [pdf] - 11754
The Gamma Ray Burst section of the White Paper on the Status and Future
of Very High Energy Gamma Ray Astronomy: A Brief Preliminary Report
Falcone, A. D.;
Williams, D. A.;
Baring, M. G.;
Blandford, R.;
Connaughton, V.;
Coppi, P.;
Dermer, C.;
Dingus, B.;
Fryer, C.;
Gehrels, N.;
Granot, J.;
Horan, D.;
Katz, J. I.;
Kuehn, K.;
Meszaros, P.;
Norris, J.;
Parkinson, P. Saz;
Peer, A.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Razzaque, S.;
Wang, X.;
Zhang, B.
Submitted: 2008-04-15
This is a short report on the preliminary findings of the gamma ray burst
(GRB) working group for the white paper on the status and future of very high
energy (VHE; >50 GeV) gamma-ray astronomy. The white paper discusses the status
of past and current attempts to observe GRBs at GeV-TeV energies, including a
handful of low-significance, possible detections. The white paper concentrates
on the potential of future ground-based gamma-ray experiments to observe the
highest energy emission ever recorded for GRBs, particularly for those that are
nearby and have high Lorentz factors in the GRB jet. It is clear that the
detection of VHE emission would have strong implications for GRB models, as
well as cosmic ray origin. In particular, the extended emission phase
(including both afterglow emission and possible flaring) of nearby long GRBs
could provide the best possibility for detection. The difficult-to-obtain
observations during the prompt phase of nearby long GRBs and short GRBs could
also provide particularly strong constraints on the opacity and bulk Lorentz
factors surrounding the acceleration site. The synergy with upcoming and
existing observatories will, of course, be critical for both identification of
GRBs and for multiwavelength/multimessenger studies.
[105]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.2184 [pdf] - 487
Calibration of the GLAST Burst Monitor detectors
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Steinle, Helmut;
Krumrey, Michael;
Gerlach, Martin;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Meegan, Charles;
Bhat, Narayana;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Diehl, Roland;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Greiner, Jochen;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Paciesas, William;
Preece, Robert;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen
Submitted: 2007-04-17
The GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) will augment the capabilities of GLAST for the
detection of cosmic gamma-ray bursts by extending the energy range (20 MeV to >
300 GeV) of the Large Area Telescope (LAT) towards lower energies by 2
BGO-detectors (150 keV to 30 MeV) and 12 NaI(Tl) detectors (10 keV to 1 MeV).
The physical detector response of the GBM instrument for GRBs is determined
with the help of Monte Carlo simulations, which are supported and verified by
on-ground calibration measurements, performed extensively with the individual
detectors at the MPE in 2005. All flight and spare detectors were irradiated
with calibrated radioactive sources in the laboratory (from 14 keV to 4.43
MeV). The energy/channel-relations, the dependences of energy resolution and
effective areas on the energy and the angular responses were measured. Due to
the low number of emission lines of radioactive sources below 100 keV,
calibration measurements in the energy range from 10 keV to 60 keV were
performed with the X-ray radiometry working group of the
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) at the BESSY synchrotron radiation
facility, Berlin.
[106]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407144 [pdf] - 65986
The GLAST Burst Monitor
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Meegan, Charles A.;
Lichti, Giselher G.;
Bhat, Narayana P.;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Connaughton, Valerie;
Diehl, Roland;
Fishman, Gerald J.;
Greiner, Jochen;
Hoover, Andrew S.;
Kippen, R. Marc;
Kouveliotou, Chryssa;
Paciesas, William S.;
Preece, Robert D.;
Schoenfelder, Volker;
Steinle, Helmut;
Wilson, Robert B.
Submitted: 2004-07-07
The next large NASA mission in the field of gamma-ray astronomy, GLAST, is
scheduled for launch in 2007. Aside from the main instrument LAT (Large-Area
Telescope), a gamma-ray telescope for the energy range between 20 MeV and > 100
GeV, a secondary instrument, the GLAST burst monitor (GBM), is foreseen. With
this monitor one of the key scientific objectives of the mission, the
determination of the high-energy behaviour of gamma-ray bursts and transients
can be ensured. Its task is to increase the detection rate of gamma-ray bursts
for the LAT and to extend the energy range to lower energies (from ~10 keV to
\~30 MeV). It will provide real-time burst locations over a wide FoV with
sufficient accuracy to allow repointing the GLAST spacecraft. Time-resolved
spectra of many bursts recorded with LAT and the burst monitor will allow the
investigation of the relation between the keV and the MeV-GeV emission from
GRBs over unprecedented seven decades of energy. This will help to advance our
understanding of the mechanisms by which gamma-rays are generated in gamma-ray
bursts.
[107]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0404453 [pdf] - 64361
The Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) Earth Occultation
Catalog of Low-Energy Gamma-Ray Sources
Harmon, B. A.;
Wilson, C. A.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Henze, W.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Finger, M. H.;
McCollough, M. L.;
Sahi, M.;
Peterson, B.;
Shrader, C. R.;
Grindlay, J. E.;
Barret, D.
Submitted: 2004-04-22
The Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE), aboard the Compton Gamma
Ray Observatory (CGRO), provided a record of the low-energy gamma-ray sky
(20-1000 keV) between 1991 April and 2000 May (9.1y). Using the Earth
Occultation Technique to extract flux information, a catalog of sources using
data from the BATSE large area detectors has been prepared. The first part of
the catalog consists of results from the monitoring of 58 sources, mostly
Galactic. For these sources, we have included tables of flux and spectral data,
and outburst times for transients. Light curves (or flux histories) have been
placed on the world wide web. We then performed a deep-sampling of 179 objects
(including the aforementioned 58 objects) combining data from the entire 9.1y
BATSE dataset. Source types considered were primarily accreting binaries, but a
small number of representative active galaxies, X-ray-emitting stars, and
supernova remnants were also included. The deep sample results include definite
detections of 83 objects and possible detections of 36 additional objects. The
definite detections spanned three classes of sources: accreting black hole and
neutron star binaries, active galaxies and supernova remnants. Flux data for
the deep sample are presented in four energy bands: 20-40, 40-70, 70-160, and
160-430 keV. The limiting average flux level (9.1 y) for the sample varies from
3.5 to 20 mCrab (5 sigma) between 20 and 430 keV, depending on systematic
error, which in turn is primarily dependent on the sky location. To strengthen
the credibility of detection of weaker sources (5-25 mCrab), we generated Earth
occultation images, searched for periodic behavior using FFT and epoch folding
methods, and critically evaluated the energy-dependent emission in the four
flux bands.
[108]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0312335 [pdf] - 61548
GLAST's GBM Burst Trigger
Submitted: 2003-12-12
The GLAST Burst Monitor (GBM) will detect and localize bursts for the GLAST
mission, and provide the spectral and temporal context in the traditional 10
keV to 25 MeV band for the high energy observations by the Large Area Telescope
(LAT). The GBM will use traditional rate triggers in up to three energy bands,
and on a variety of timescales between 16 ms and 16 s.
[109]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0201469 [pdf] - 47413
Extended Power-Law Decays in BATSE Gamma-Ray Bursts: Signatures of
External Shocks?
Submitted: 2002-01-29
The connection between Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows is
currently not well understood. Afterglow models of synchrotron emission
generated by external shocks in the GRB fireball model predict emission
detectable in the gamma-ray regime ($\gax 25$ keV). In this paper, we present a
temporal and spectral analysis of a subset of BATSE GRBs with smooth extended
emission tails to search for signatures of the ``early high-energy afterglow'',
i.e., afterglow emission that initially begins in the gamma-ray phase and
subsequently evolves into X-Ray, uv, optical, and radio emission as the blast
wave is decelerated by the ambient medium. From a sample of 40 GRBs we find
that the temporal decays are best described with a power-law $\sim t^{\beta}$,
rather than an exponential, with a mean index $<\beta > \approx -2$. Spectral
analysis shows that $\sim 20%$ of these events are consistent with fast-cooling
synchrotron emission for an adiabatic blast wave; three of which are consistent
with the blast wave evolution of a jet, with $F_{\nu} \sim t^{-p}$. This
behavior suggests that, in some cases, the emission may originate from a narrow
jet, possibly consisting of ``nuggets'' whose angular size are less than $1 /
\Gamma$, where $\Gamma$ is the bulk Lorentz factor.
[110]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0111564 [pdf] - 46330
BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Tails
Submitted: 2001-11-29
I discuss in this paper the phenomenon of post-burst emission in BATSE
gamma-ray bursts at energies traditionally associated with prompt emission. By
summing the background-subtracted signals from hundreds of bursts, I find that
tails out to hundreds of seconds after the trigger may be a common feature of
long events (duration greater than 2s), and perhaps of the shorter bursts at a
lower and shorter-lived level. The tail component appears independent of both
the duration (within the long GRB sample) and brightness of the prompt burst
emission, and may be softer. Some individual bursts have visible tails at
gamma-ray energies and the spectrum in at least a few cases is different from
that of the prompt emission.
[111]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005468 [pdf] - 362884
A New Analysis Method for Reconstructing the Arrival Direction of TeV
Gamma-rays Using a Single Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope
Submitted: 2000-05-23
We present a method of atmospheric Cherenkov imaging which reconstructs the
unique arrival direction of TeV gamma rays using a single telescope. The method
is derived empirically and utilizes several features of gamma-ray induced air
showers which determine, to a precision of 0.12 degrees, the arrival direction
of photons, on an event-by-event basis. Data from the Whipple Observatory's 10
m gamma-ray telescope is utilized to test selection methods based on source
location. The results compare these selection methods with traditional
techniques and three different camera fields of view. The method will be
discussed in the context of a search for a gamma-ray signal from a point source
located anywhere within the field of view and from regions of extended
emission.
[112]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0002255 [pdf] - 34598
Multiwavelength observations of Mkn 501 during the 1997 high state
Petry, D.;
Boettcher, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Pursimo, T.;
Raiteri, C. M.;
Schroeder, F.;
Sillanpaa, A.;
Sobrito, G.;
Takalo, L.;
Terasranta, H.;
Tosti, G.;
Villata, M.
Submitted: 2000-02-11
During the observation period 1997, the nearby Blazar Mkn 501 showed
extremely strong emission and high variability. We examine multiwavelength
aspects of this event using radio, optical, soft and hard X-ray and TeV data.
We concentrate on the medium-timescale variability of the broadband spectra,
averaged over weekly intervals.
We confirm the previously found correlation between soft and hard X-ray
emission and the emission at TeV energies, while the source shows only minor
variability at radio and optical wavelengths. The non-linear correlation
between hard X-ray and TeV fluxes is consistent with a simple analytic estimate
based on an SSC model in which Klein-Nishina effects are important for the
highest-energy electrons in the jet, and flux variations are caused by
variations of the electron density and/or the spectral index of the electron
injection spectrum.
The time-averaged spectra are fitted with a Synchrotron Self-Compton (SSC)
dominated leptonic jet model, using the full Klein-Nishina cross section and
following the self-consistent evolution of relativistic particles along the
jet, accounting for gamma-gamma absorption and pair production within the
source as well as due to the intergalactic infrared background radiation. The
contribution from external inverse-Compton scattering is tightly constrained by
the low maximum EGRET flux and found to be negligible at TeV energies. We find
that high levels of the X-ray and TeV fluxes can be explained by a hardening of
the energy spectra of electrons injected at the base of the jet, in remarkable
contrast to the trend found for gamma-ray flares of the flat-spectrum radio
quasar PKS 0528+134.
[113]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908139 [pdf] - 107811
Evidence for an Early High-Energy Afterglow Observed with BATSE from
GRB980923
Submitted: 1999-08-12
In this Letter, we present the first evidence in the BATSE data for a prompt
high-energy (25-300 keV) afterglow component from a gamma-ray burst (GRB),
GRB980923. The event consists of rapid variabilty lasting ~40 s followed by a
smooth power law emission tail lasting ~400 s. An abrupt change in spectral
shape is found when the tail becomes noticeable. Our analysis reveals that the
spectral evolution in the tail of the burst mimics that of a cooling
synchrotron spectrum, similar to the spectral evolution of the low-energy
afterglows for GRBs. This evidence for a separate emission component is
consistent with the internal-external shock scenario in the relativistic
fireball picture. In particular, it illustrates that the external shocks can be
generated during the gamma-ray emission phase, as in the case of GRB990123.
[114]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903205 [pdf] - 105609
The Fourth BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog (Revised)
Paciesas, W. S.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Pendleton, G. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Koshut, T. M.;
Lestrade, J. P.;
McCollough, M. L.;
Brainerd, J. J.;
Hakkila, J.;
Henze, W.;
Preece, R. D.;
Connaughton, V.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Mallozzi, R. S.;
Fishman, G. J.;
Richardson, G. A.;
Sahi, M.
Submitted: 1999-03-12
The Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) on the Compton Gamma Ray
Observatory (CGRO) has triggered on 1637 cosmic gamma-ray bursts between 1991
April 19 and 1996 August 29. These events constitute the Fourth BATSE burst
catalog. The current version (4Br) has been revised from the version first
circulated on CD-ROM in September 1997 (4B) to include improved locations for a
subset of bursts that have been reprocssed using additional data. A significant
difference from previous BATSE catalogs is the inclusion of bursts from periods
when the trigger energy range differed from the nominal 50-300 keV. We present
tables of the burst occurrence times, locations, peak fluxes, fluences, and
durations. In general, results from previous BATSE catalogs are confirmed here
with greater statistical significance.
[115]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9901111 [pdf] - 104705
The Error Distribution of BATSE GRB Locations
Submitted: 1999-01-10
Empirical probability models for BATSE GRB location errors are developed via
a Bayesian analysis of the separations between BATSE GRB locations and
locations obtained with the InterPlanetary Network (IPN). Models are compared
and their parameters estimated using 392 GRBs with single IPN annuli and 19
GRBs with intersecting IPN annuli. Most of the analysis is for the 4Br BATSE
catalog; earlier catalogs are also analyzed. The simplest model that provides a
good representation of the error distribution has 78% of the probability in a
`core' term with a systematic error of 1.85 degrees and the remainder in an
extended tail with a systematic error of 5.1 degrees, implying a 68% confidence
radius for bursts with negligible statistical uncertainties of 2.2 degrees.
There is evidence for a more complicated model in which the error distribution
depends on the BATSE datatype that was used to obtain the location. Bright
bursts are typically located using the CONT datatype, and according to the more
complicated model, the 68% confidence radius for CONT-located bursts with
negligible statistical uncertainties is 2.0 degrees.
[116]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811112 [pdf] - 103738
BATSE observations of BL Lac Objects
Submitted: 1998-11-06
The Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) on the Compton Gamma-Ray
Observatory has been shown to be sensitive to non-transient hard X-ray sources
in our galaxy, down to flux levels of 100 mCrab for daily measurements, 3 mCrab
for integrations over several years. We use the continuous BATSE database and
the Earth Occultation technique to extract average flux values between 20 and
200 keV from complete radio- and X-ray- selected BL Lac samples over a 2 year
period.
[117]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9712325 [pdf] - 279593
Discovery of >350 GeV Gamma Rays from the BL Lacertae Object 1ES
2344+514
Catanese, M.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Badran, H. M.;
Biller, S. D.;
Bond, I. H.;
Boyle, P. J.;
Bradbury, S. M.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Burdett, A. M.;
Gordo, J. Bussons;
Carter-Lewis, D. A.;
Cawley, M. F.;
Connaughton, V.;
Fegan, D. J.;
Finley, J. P.;
Gaidos, J. A.;
Hall, T.;
Hillas, A. M.;
Krennrich, F.;
Lamb, R. C.;
Lessard, R. W.;
Masterson, C.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Mohanty, G.;
Quinn, J.;
Rodgers, A. J.;
Rose, H. J.;
Samuelson, F. W.;
Schubnell, M. S.;
Sembroski, G. H.;
Srinivasan, R.;
Weekes, T. C.;
Wilson, C. W.;
Zweerink, J.
Submitted: 1997-12-24
We present the discovery of >350 GeV gamma-ray emission from the BL Lacertae
object 1ES 2344+514 with the Whipple Observatory 10m gamma-ray telescope. This
is the third BL Lac object detected at gamma-ray energies above 300 Gev, the
other two being Markarian 421 (Mrk 421) and Mrk501. These three active galactic
nuclei are all X-ray selected and have the lowest known redshifts of any BL Lac
objects currently identified. The evidence for emission derives primarily from
an apparent flare on December 20, 1995 when a 6 sigma excess was detected with
a flux approximately 63% of the very high energy gamma-ray emission from the
Crab Nebula, the standard candle for TeV gamma-ray sources. Excluding the
flare, observations between October 1995 and January 1996 yield a 4 sigma
detection corresponding to 11% of the VHE Crab Nebula flux. Observations
spanning September 1996 to January 1997 failed to yield a significant detection
of a steady flux or any flaring. For this period, the 99.9% confidence level
upper limit is <8% of the Crab Nebula. The low baseline emission level and
variations in nightly and yearly flux of 1ES 22344+514 are the same as the VHE
emission characteristics of Mrk 421 and Mrk 501
[118]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9712092 [pdf] - 99581
GRB Repetition Limits from Current BATSE Observations
Submitted: 1997-12-05
Revised upper limits on gamma-ray burst repetition rates are found using the
BATSE 3B and 4B catalogs. A statistical repetition model is assumed in which
sources burst at a mean rate but in which BATSE observes bursts randomly from
each source.
[119]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9712079 [pdf] - 99568
BATSE GRB Location Errors
Submitted: 1997-12-05
We characterize the error distribution of BATSE GRB locations by modeling the
distribution of separations between BATSE locations and IPN annuli. We
determine error model parameters by maximizing likelihood and rank the models
by their Bayesian odds ratios. The best models have several systematic error
terms. The simplest good model has a 1.9 degree systematic error with
probability 73% and 5.4 degrees with probability 27%. A more complex model adds
a dependence on the datatype used to derive the location.
[120]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9706132 [pdf] - 97653
Search for TeV Counterparts in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Boyle, P. J.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Burdett, A. M.;
Gordo, J. Bussons;
Carter-Lewis, D. A.;
Catanese, M.;
Cawley, M. F.;
Connaughton, V.;
Fegan, D. J.;
Finley, J. P.;
Gaidos, J. A.;
Harris, K.;
Hillas, A. M.;
Lamb, R. C.;
Krennrich, F.;
Lessard, R. W.;
Masterson, C.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Mohanty, G.;
Porter, N. A.;
Quinn, J.;
Rodgers, A. J.;
Rose, H. J.;
Samuelson, F. W.;
Sembroski, G. H.;
Srinivasan, R.;
Weekes, T. C.;
Zweerink, J.
Submitted: 1997-06-13
Based on BACODINE network notification the Whipple Observatory gamma-ray
telescope has been used to search for the delayed TeV counterpart to
BATSE-detected gamma-ray bursts. In the fast slew mode, any point in the sky
can be reached within two minutes of the burst notification. The search
strategy, necessary because of the uncertainty in burst position and limited
FOV of the camera, is described.
[121]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9706123 [pdf] - 97644
A search for correlations of TeV gamma-rays with ultra-high energy
cosmic rays
Akerlof, C. W.;
Biller, S.;
Boyle, P.;
Buckley, J.;
Carter-Lewis, D. A.;
Catanese, M.;
Cawley, M. F.;
Connaughton, V.;
Fegan, D. J.;
Finley, J.;
Gaidos, J.;
Hillas, A. M.;
Krennrich, F.;
Lamb, R. C.;
Lessard, R.;
McEnery, J.;
Mohanty, G.;
Porter, N. A.;
Quinn, J.;
Rodgers, A.;
Rose, H. J.;
Samuelson, F.;
Schubnell, M. S.;
Sembroski, G.;
Srinivasan, R.;
Weekes, T. C.;
Zweerink, J.;
.
Submitted: 1997-06-12
A search was conducted for TeV gamma-rays emitted from the direction of the
ultra-high energy cosmic ray detected by the Fly's Eye Experiment with E ~ 3 x
10**20 eV. No enhancement was found at a level of 10**-10 gamma/cm**2-sec for
E>350 GeV. This upper limit is consistent with theoretical estimates based on
topological defects as sources of UHE cosmic rays. An upper limit was also set
for the flux of TeV gamma rays from 3C147, the most prominent AGN in the error
box.
[122]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9602068 [pdf] - 94120
Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from the Blazar Markarian 421
Schubnell, M. S.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Buckley, S. Biller J.;
Carter-Lewis, D. A.;
Cawley, M. F.;
Chantell, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Fegan, D. J.;
Fennell, S.;
Gaidos, J. A.;
Hillas, A. M.;
Lamb, A. D. Kerrick R. C.;
Meyer, D. I.;
Mohanty, G.;
Rose, J.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Sembroski, G.;
Weekes, T. C.;
Wilson, C.;
Zweerink, J.
Submitted: 1996-02-14
Very high energy gamma-ray emission from the BL Lac object Markarian 421 has
been detected over three observing seasons on 59 nights between April 1992 and
June 1994 with the Whipple 10-meter imaging Cherenkov telescope. During its
initial detection in 1992, its flux above 500 GeV was
1.6$\times$10$^{-11}$photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. Observations in 1993 confirmed
this level of emission. For observations made between December 1993 and April
1994, its intensity was a factor of 2.2$\pm$0.5 lower. Observations on 14 and
15 May, 1994 showed an increase over this quiescent level by a factor of
$\sim$10 (Kerrick et al. 1995). This strong outburst suggests that 4 episodes
of increased flux measurements on similar time scales in 1992 and 1994 may be
attributed to somewhat weaker outbursts. The variability of the TeV gamma-ray
emission from Markarian 421 stands in contrast to EGRET observations (Lin et
al. 1994) which show no evidence for variability.
