In this paper we re-examine historical references to the supernova event of 1054 AD with a view to establishing a sequence astronomical events which minimizes apparent conflicts between the various sources. We find that the explosion of the supernova is likely to have occurred weeks to months before the commonly accepted date of July 4th 1054. This view is strongly supported by a number of European references to events visible in the evening sky during the spring which are likely to be associated with the appearance of the supernova. We find the best fit to the light curve based on Chinese observations and a maximum visible apparent magnitude for a supernova located at the distance to the Crab Nebula also confirms the earlier explosion date.

The traditional argument to justify Omega_0 = rho/rho_{crit} = 1 which suggests an absurdly close agreement between the initial expansion energy of the universe and its binding energy is reversed to show that it is unreasonable to expect the current value of W to be within a factor of ten or more of unity. The Uncertainty Principle is applied to the initial value of the mass require to close the universe. The tiny fractional uncertainty is amplified so that the current fractional uncertainty is of the order of unity. This suggests that the requirement of exact initial agreement between the binding energy and the expansion energy is unreasonable as it can never be tested by contemporary measurement.