Normalized to: Clayton, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.02915 [pdf] - 1828935
Catching Element Formation In The Act
Fryer, Chris L.;
Timmes, Frank;
Hungerford, Aimee L.;
Couture, Aaron;
Adams, Fred;
Aoki, Wako;
Arcones, Almudena;
Arnett, David;
Auchettl, Katie;
Avila, Melina;
Badenes, Carles;
Baron, Eddie;
Bauswein, Andreas;
Beacom, John;
Blackmon, Jeff;
Blondin, Stephane;
Bloser, Peter;
Boggs, Steve;
Boss, Alan;
Brandt, Terri;
Bravo, Eduardo;
Brown, Ed;
Brown, Peter;
Budtz-Jorgensen, Steve Bruenn. Carl;
Burns, Eric;
Calder, Alan;
Caputo, Regina;
Champagne, Art;
Chevalier, Roger;
Chieffi, Alessandro;
Chipps, Kelly;
Cinabro, David;
Clarkson, Ondrea;
Clayton, Don;
Coc, Alain;
Connolly, Devin;
Conroy, Charlie;
Cote, Benoit;
Couch, Sean;
Dauphas, Nicolas;
deBoer, Richard James;
Deibel, Catherine;
Denisenkov, Pavel;
Desch, Steve;
Dessart, Luc;
Diehl, Roland;
Doherty, Carolyn;
Dominguez, Inma;
Dong, Subo;
Dwarkadas, Vikram;
Fan, Doreen;
Fields, Brian;
Fields, Carl;
Filippenko, Alex;
Fisher, Robert;
Foucart, Francois;
Fransson, Claes;
Frohlich, Carla;
Fuller, George;
Gibson, Brad;
Giryanskaya, Viktoriya;
Gorres, Joachim;
Goriely, Stephane;
Grebenev, Sergei;
Grefenstette, Brian;
Grohs, Evan;
Guillochon, James;
Harpole, Alice;
Harris, Chelsea;
Harris, J. Austin;
Harrison, Fiona;
Hartmann, Dieter;
Hashimoto, Masa-aki;
Heger, Alexander;
Hernanz, Margarita;
Herwig, Falk;
Hirschi, Raphael;
Hix, Raphael William;
Hoflich, Peter;
Hoffman, Robert;
Holcomb, Cole;
Hsiao, Eric;
Iliadis, Christian;
Janiuk, Agnieszka;
Janka, Thomas;
Jerkstrand, Anders;
Johns, Lucas;
Jones, Samuel;
Jose, Jordi;
Kajino, Toshitaka;
Karakas, Amanda;
Karpov, Platon;
Kasen, Dan;
Kierans, Carolyn;
Kippen, Marc;
Korobkin, Oleg;
Kobayashi, Chiaki;
Kozma, Cecilia;
Krot, Saha;
Kumar, Pawan;
Kuvvetli, Irfan;
Laird, Alison;
Laming, Martin;
Larsson, Josefin;
Lattanzio, John;
Lattimer, James;
Leising, Mark;
Lennarz, Annika;
Lentz, Eric;
Limongi, Marco;
Lippuner, Jonas;
Livne, Eli;
Lloyd-Ronning, Nicole;
Longland, Richard;
Lopez, Laura A.;
Lugaro, Maria;
Lutovinov, Alexander;
Madsen, Kristin;
Malone, Chris;
Matteucci, Francesca;
McEnery, Julie;
Meisel, Zach;
Messer, Bronson;
Metzger, Brian;
Meyer, Bradley;
Meynet, Georges;
Mezzacappa, Anthony;
Miller, Jonah;
Miller, Richard;
Milne, Peter;
Misch, Wendell;
Mitchell, Lee;
Mosta, Philipp;
Motizuki, Yuko;
Muller, Bernhard;
Mumpower, Matthew;
Murphy, Jeremiah;
Nagataki, Shigehiro;
Nakar, Ehud;
Nomoto, Ken'ichi;
Nugent, Peter;
Nunes, Filomena;
O'Shea, Brian;
Oberlack, Uwe;
Pain, Steven;
Parker, Lucas;
Perego, Albino;
Pignatari, Marco;
Pinedo, Gabriel Martinez;
Plewa, Tomasz;
Poznanski, Dovi;
Priedhorsky, William;
Pritychenko, Boris;
Radice, David;
Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico;
Rauscher, Thomas;
Reddy, Sanjay;
Rehm, Ernst;
Reifarth, Rene;
Richman, Debra;
Ricker, Paul;
Rijal, Nabin;
Roberts, Luke;
Ropke, Friedrich;
Rosswog, Stephan;
Ruiter, Ashley J.;
Ruiz, Chris;
Savin, Daniel Wolf;
Schatz, Hendrik;
Schneider, Dieter;
Schwab, Josiah;
Seitenzahl, Ivo;
Shen, Ken;
Siegert, Thomas;
Sim, Stuart;
Smith, David;
Smith, Karl;
Smith, Michael;
Sollerman, Jesper;
Sprouse, Trevor;
Spyrou, Artemis;
Starrfield, Sumner;
Steiner, Andrew;
Strong, Andrew W.;
Sukhbold, Tuguldur;
Suntzeff, Nick;
Surman, Rebecca;
Tanimori, Toru;
The, Lih-Sin;
Thielemann, Friedrich-Karl;
Tolstov, Alexey;
Tominaga, Nozomu;
Tomsick, John;
Townsley, Dean;
Tsintari, Pelagia;
Tsygankov, Sergey;
Vartanyan, David;
Venters, Tonia;
Vestrand, Tom;
Vink, Jacco;
Waldman, Roni;
Wang, Lifang;
Wang, Xilu;
Warren, MacKenzie;
West, Christopher;
Wheeler, J. Craig;
Wiescher, Michael;
Winkler, Christoph;
Winter, Lisa;
Wolf, Bill;
Woolf, Richard;
Woosley, Stan;
Wu, Jin;
Wrede, Chris;
Yamada, Shoichi;
Young, Patrick;
Zegers, Remco;
Zingale, Michael;
Zwart, Simon Portegies
Submitted: 2019-02-07
Gamma-ray astronomy explores the most energetic photons in nature to address
some of the most pressing puzzles in contemporary astrophysics. It encompasses
a wide range of objects and phenomena: stars, supernovae, novae, neutron stars,
stellar-mass black holes, nucleosynthesis, the interstellar medium, cosmic rays
and relativistic-particle acceleration, and the evolution of galaxies. MeV
gamma-rays provide a unique probe of nuclear processes in astronomy, directly
measuring radioactive decay, nuclear de-excitation, and positron annihilation.
The substantial information carried by gamma-ray photons allows us to see
deeper into these objects, the bulk of the power is often emitted at gamma-ray
energies, and radioactivity provides a natural physical clock that adds unique
information. New science will be driven by time-domain population studies at
gamma-ray energies. This science is enabled by next-generation gamma-ray
instruments with one to two orders of magnitude better sensitivity, larger sky
coverage, and faster cadence than all previous gamma-ray instruments. This
transformative capability permits: (a) the accurate identification of the
gamma-ray emitting objects and correlations with observations taken at other
wavelengths and with other messengers; (b) construction of new gamma-ray maps
of the Milky Way and other nearby galaxies where extended regions are
distinguished from point sources; and (c) considerable serendipitous science of
scarce events -- nearby neutron star mergers, for example. Advances in
technology push the performance of new gamma-ray instruments to address a wide
set of astrophysical questions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.1542 [pdf] - 226573
The Role of Radioactivities in Astrophysics
Submitted: 2010-09-08
I present both a history of radioactivity in astrophysics and an introduction
to the major applications of radioactive abundances to astronomy.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601039 [pdf] - 78897
Are Ti44-Producing Supernovae Exceptional?
Submitted: 2006-01-02, last modified: 2006-04-24
According to standard models supernovae produce radioactive $^{44}$Ti, which
should be visible in gamma-rays following decay to $^{44}$Ca for a few
centuries. $^{44}Ti production is believed to be the source of cosmic
$^{44}$Ca, whose abundance is well established. Yet, gamma-ray telescopes have
not seen the expected young remnants of core collapse events. The $^{44}$Ti
mean life of $\tau \simeq$ 89 y and the Galactic supernova rate of $\simeq$
3/100 y imply $\simeq$ several detectable $^{44}Ti gamma-ray sources, but only
one is clearly seen, the 340-year-old Cas A SNR. Furthermore, supernovae which
produce much $^{44}Ti are expected to occur primarily in the inner part of the
Galaxy, where young massive stars are most abundant. Because the Galaxy is
transparent to gamma-rays, this should be the dominant location of expected
gamma-ray sources. Yet the Cas A SNR as the only one source is located far from
the inner Galaxy (at longitude 112 degree). We evaluate the surprising absence
of detectable supernovae from the past three centuries. We discuss whether our
understanding of SN explosions, their $^{44}Ti yields, their spatial
distributions, and statistical arguments can be stretched so that this apparent
disagreement may be accommodated within reasonable expectations, or if we have
to revise some or all of the above aspects to bring expectations in agreement
with the observations. We conclude that either core collapse supernovae have
been improbably rare in the Galaxy during the past few centuries, or
$^{44}Ti-producing supernovae are atypical supernovae. We also present a new
argument based on $^{44}$Ca/$^{40}$Ca ratios in mainstream SiC stardust grains
that may cast doubt on massive-He-cap Type I supernovae as the source of most
galactic $^{44}$Ca.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302120 [pdf] - 54747
Supernova Reverse Shocks and SiC Growth
Submitted: 2003-02-06
We present new mechanisms by which the isotopic compositions of X-type grains
of presolar SiC are altered by reverse shocks in Type II supernovae. We address
three epochs of reverse shocks: pressure wave from the H envelope near t =
10$^6$s; reverse shock from the presupernova wind near 10$^8-10^9$s; reverse
shock from the ISM near 10$^{10}$s. Using 1-D hydrodynamics we show that the
first creates a dense shell of Si and C atoms near 10$^6$s in which the SiC
surely condenses. The second reverse shock causes precondensed grains to move
rapidly forward through decelerated gas of different isotopic composition,
during which implantation, sputtering and further condensation occur
simultaneously. The third reverse shock causes only further ion implantation
and sputtering, which may affect trace element isotopic compositions. Using a
25M$_{\odot}$ supernova model we propose solutions to the following unsolved
questions: where does SiC condense?; why does SiC condense in preference to
graphite?; why is condensed SiC $^{28}$Si-rich?; why is O richness no obstacle
to SiC condensation?; how many atoms of each isotope are impacted by a grain
that condenses at time t$_0$ at radial coordinate r$_0$? These many
considerations are put forward as a road map for interpreting SiC X grains
found in meteorites and their meaning for supernova physics.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9806211 [pdf] - 101804
Nuclear Reactions Rates Governing the Nucleosynthesis of Ti44
Submitted: 1998-06-15
Large excesses of Ca44 in certain presolar graphite and silicon carbide
grains give strong evidence for Ti44 production in supernovae. Furthermore,
recent detection of the Ti44 gamma-line from the Cas A SNR by CGRO/COMPTEL
shows that radioactive Ti44 is produced in supernovae. These make the Ti44
abundance an observable diagnostic of supernovae. Through use of a nuclear
reaction network, we have systematically varied reaction rates and groups of
reaction rates to experimentally identify those that govern Ti44 abundance in
core-collapse supernova nucleosynthesis. We survey the nuclear-rate dependence
by repeated calculations of the identical adiabatic expansion, with peak
temperature and density chosen to be 5.5xE9 K and 1E7 g/cc, respectively, to
approximate the conditions in detailed supernova models. We find that, for
equal total numbers of neutrons and protons (eta=0), Ti44 production is most
sensitive to the following reaction rates: Ti44(alpha,p)V47,
alpha(2alpha,gamma)C12, Ti44(alpha,gamma)Cr48, V45(p,gamma)Cr46. We tabulate
the most sensitive reactions in order of their importance to the Ti44
production near the standard values of currently accepted cross-sections, at
both reduced reaction rate (0.01X) and at increased reaction rate (100X)
relative to their standard values. Although most reactions retain their
importance for eta > 0, that of V45(p,gamma)Cr46 drops rapidly for eta >=
0.0004. Other reactions assume greater significance at greater neutron excess:
C12(alpha,gamma)O16, Ca40(alpha,gamma)Ti44, Al27(alpha,n)P30, Si30(alpha,n)S33.
Because many of these rates are unknown experimentally, our results suggest the
most important targets for future cross section measurements governing the
value of this observable abundance.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9701240 [pdf] - 96513
Placing the Sun in Galactic Chemical Evolution: Mainstream SiC Particles
Submitted: 1997-01-30
We examine the consequences and implications of the possibility that the
best-fit $m$=4/3 line of the silicon isotopic ratios measured in mainstream SiC
grains is identical or parallel to to the mean ISM evolution line of the
silicon isotopes. Even though the mean ISM evolution proceeds along a line of
unity slope when deviations are expressed in terms of the native representation
(the mean ISM), the evolution line can become a slope 4/3 line in the solar
representation, provided that the solar composition is displaced from the mean
ISM evolution. During the course of this analysis, we introduce new methods for
relating the solar composition to that of the mean ISM at the time of solar
birth. These new developments offer a unique view on the meaning of the
mainstream SiC particles, and affords a new way of quantitatively answering the
question whether the sun has a special composition relative to the mean ISM at
solar birth. If the correlation slope of the silicon isotopes in the mean ISM
could be decisively established, then its value would quantify the difference
between the solar and mean ISM silicon abundances. Our formalism details the
transformations between the two representations, and applies not only to
$^{29}$Si and $^{30}$Si, but to any two purely secondary isotopes of any
element (O, Ne, Mg, and perhaps S). Both the advantages and disadvantages of
this technique are critically reviewed.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9606167 [pdf] - 94927
Galactic Evolution of Silicon Isotopes: Application to Presolar SiC
Grains From Meteorites
Submitted: 1996-06-27
We calculate and discuss the chemical evolution of the isotopic silicon
abundances in the interstellar medium at distances and times appropriate to the
birth of the solar system. This has several objectives, some of which are
related to anomalous silicon isotope ratios within presolar grains extracted
from meteorites; namely: (1) What is the relative importance for silicon
isotopic compositions in the bulk ISM of Type II supernovae, Type Ia
supernovae, and AGB stars? (2) Are $^{29}$Si and $^{30}$Si primary or secondary
nucleosynthesis products? (3) In what isotopic direction in a three-isotope
plot do core-collapse supernovae of different mass move the silicon isotopic
composition? (4) Why do present calculations not reproduce the solar ratios for
silicon isotopes, and what does that impose upon studies of anomalous Si
isotopes in meteoritic silicon carbide grains? (5) Are chemical-evolution
features recorded in the anomalous SiC grains? Our answers are formulated on
the basis of the Woosley \& Weaver (1995) supernova yield survey.
Renormalization with the calculated interstellar medium silicon isotopic
composition and solar composition is as an important and recurring concept of
this paper. Possible interpretations of the silicon isotope anomalies measured
in single SiC grains extracted from carbonaceous meteorites are then presented.
The calculations suggest that the temporal evolution of the isotopic silicon
abundances in the interstellar medium may be recorded in these grains.