Originally complied for 1868-1967 and subsequently continued so that it now covers 150 years, the $aa$ index has become a vital resource for studying space climate change. However, there have been debates about the inter-calibration of data from the different stations. In addition, the effects of secular change in the geomagnetic field have not previously been allowed for. As a result, the components of the 'classical' $aa$ index for the southern and northern hemispheres ($aa_S$ and $aa_N$) have drifted apart. We here separately correct both $aa_S$ and $aa_N$ for both these effects using the same method as used to generate the classic $aa$ values but allowing ${\delta}$, the minimum angular separation of each station from a nominal auroral oval, to vary as calculated using the IGRF-12 and gufm1 models of the intrinsic geomagnetic field. Our approach is to correct the quantized aK-values for each station, originally scaled on the assumption that ${\delta}$ values are constant, with time-dependent scale factors that allow for the drift in ${\delta}$. This requires revisiting the intercalibration of successive stations used in making the $aa_S$ and $aa_N$ composites. These intercalibrations are defined using independent data and daily averages from 11 years before and after each station change and it is shown that they depend on the time of year. This procedure produces new homogenized hemispheric aa indices, $aa_{HS}$ and $aa_{HN}$, which show centennial-scale changes that are in very close agreement. Calibration problems with the classic $aa$ index are shown to have arisen from drifts in ${\delta}$ combined with simpler corrections which gave an incorrect temporal variation and underestimate the rise in $aa$ during the 20th century by about 15%.

Paper 1 [Lockwood et al., 2018] generated annual means of a new version of the $aa$ geomagnetic activity index which includes corrections for secular drift in the geographic coordinates of the auroral oval, thereby resolving the difference between the centennial-scale change in the northern and southern hemisphere indices, $aa_N$ and $aa_S$. However, other hemispheric asymmetries in the $aa$ index remain: in particular, the distributions of 3-hourly $aa_N$ and $aa_S$ values are different and the correlation between them is not high on this timescale ($r = 0.66$). In the present paper, a location-dependant station sensitivity model is developed using the $am$ index (derived from a much more extensive network of stations in both hemispheres) and used to reduce the difference between the hemispheric $aa$ indices and improve their correlation (to $r = 0.79$) by generating corrected 3-hourly hemispheric indices, $aa_{HN}$ and $aa_{HS}$, which also include the secular drift corrections detailed in Paper 1. These are combined into a new, 'homogeneous' $aa$ index, $aa_H$. It is shown that $aa_H$, unlike $aa$, reveals the 'equinoctial'-like time-of-day/time-of-year pattern that is found for the $am$ index.

We use numerical N-body simulations in order to test whether the kinematics of stars and brown dwarfs at birth depend on mass. In particular we examine how initial variations in velocity dispersion can affect the spatial distribution of stellar and substellar objects in clusters. We use 'toy' N-body models of a Pleiades-like cluster in which brown dwarfs have their own velocity dispersion sigma_(V_BD) which is k times larger than the stellar one. We find that in order to match the broad agreement between the brown dwarf fraction in the field and in the Pleiades, the velocity dispersion of brown dwarfs at birth has to be less than twice the stellar velocity dispersion, i.e. cannot exceed a few km/s in the Pleiades cluster. In order to discern more subtle differences between the kinematics of brown dwarfs and stars at birth, our simulations show that we need to look at clusters that are much less dynamically evolved than the Pleiades. One might especially seek evidence of high velocity brown dwarfs at birth by examining spatial distribution of stars and brown darfs in clusters that are about a crossing timescale old.