Normalized to: Chu, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502012 [pdf] - 70803
Comments on "Bigger Rip with no dark energy"
Submitted: 2005-02-01, last modified: 2006-12-04
We make corrections on the paper by Frampton and Takahashi [{\it Astropart.
Phys.} {\bf 22} (2004) 307]. Our focus is especially upon Eqs. (12-15) therein.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601021 [pdf] - 78879
Evolving Transport induced by a Surface Wave Propagating along a
Vacuum-Matter Interface
Submitted: 2006-01-01, last modified: 2006-02-16
Hydrodynamic derivation of the entrainment of matter induced by a surface
elastic wave propagating along the flexible vacuum-matter interface is
conducted by considering the nonlinear coupling between the interface and the
rarefaction effect. The critical reflux values associated with the product of
the second-order (unit) body forcing and the Reynolds number (representing the
viscous dissipations) decrease as the Knudsen number (representing the
rarefaction measure) increases from zero to 0.1. We obtained the critical
bounds for matter-freezed or zero-volume-flow-rate states corresponding to
specific Reynolds numbers and wave numbers which might be linked to the
evolution of the Universe. Our results also show that for positive evolution of
the matter their might be existence of negative pressure.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0412704 [pdf] - 70108
Phantom Thermodynamics Revisited
Submitted: 2004-12-30, last modified: 2005-04-18
Although generalized Chaplygin phantom models do not show any big rip
singularities, we investigated k-essence models together with noncanonical
kinetic energy for which there might be a big rip future singularity in the
phantom region. We present our results by finely tuning the parameter ($\beta$)
which is closely related to the canonical kinetic term in $k$-essence
formalism. The scale factor $a(t)$ could be negative and decreasing within a
specific range of $\beta$ during the initial evolutional period. There will be
no singularity for the scale factor for all times once $\beta$ is carefully
selected.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0501009 [pdf] - 70121
Comments on "Sudden future singularities "
Submitted: 2005-01-03, last modified: 2005-01-04
We make comments on the letter by Barrow [{\it Class. Quantum Grav.} {\bf 21}
(2004) L79] since we cannot observe a singularity for $p(t)$ as $t\to t_s$.
Instead, there might be a singularity for $\rho(t)$ for $t\sim 0$ case.