Normalized to: Chodorowski, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.04901 [pdf] - 1273302
Galaxy clustering using photometric redshifts
Submitted: 2015-08-20
We investigate the evolution of the galaxy two point correlation function
(CF) over a wide redshift range, 0.2 < z < 3. For the first time the systematic
analysis covers the redshifts above 1 - 1.5. The catalogue of ~250000 galaxies
with i+ < 25 and known photometric redshifts in the Subaru Deep field is used.
The galaxies are divided into three luminosity classes and several
distance/redshift bins. First, the 2D CF is determined for each luminosity
class and distance bin. Calculations are based on the quantitative differences
between the surface distributions of galaxy pairs with comparable and
distinctly different photometric redshifts. The power law approximation for the
CF is used. A limited accuracy of photometric redshifts as compared to the
spectroscopic ones has been examined and taken into account. Then, the 3D
functions for all the selected luminosities and distances are calculated. The
power-law parameters of the CF, the slope and the correlation length, are
determined. Both parameters do not show strong variations over the whole
investigated redshift range. The slope of the luminous galaxies appears to be
consistently steeper than that for the fainter ones. The linear bias factor,
b(z), grows systematically with redshift; assuming the local normalization b(0)
= 1.1-1.2, the bias reaches 3 - 3.5 at the high redshift limit.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.1246 [pdf] - 935751
Precision cosmology with the 2MASS clustering dipole
Submitted: 2012-11-06, last modified: 2013-11-27
Comparison of peculiar velocities of galaxies with their gravitational
accelerations (induced by the density field) is one of the methods to constrain
the redshift distortion parameter \beta=(\Omega_m^0.55)/b, where \Omega_m is
the non-relativistic matter density parameter and b is the linear bias. In
particular, one can use the motion of the Local Group (LG) for that purpose.
Its peculiar velocity is known from the dipole component of the cosmic
microwave background, whereas its acceleration can be estimated with the use of
an all-sky galaxy catalog, from the so-called clustering dipole. At the moment,
the biggest dataset of that kind is the Two Micron All Sky Survey Extended
Source Catalog (2MASS XSC) containing almost 1 million galaxies and complete up
to ~300 Mpc/h. We applied 2MASS data to measure LG acceleration and used two
methods to estimate the beta parameter. Both of them yield \beta~0.4 with an
error of several per cent, which is the most precise determination of this
parameter from the clustering dipole to date.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.5891 [pdf] - 1158683
What X-ray source counts can tell about large-scale matter distribution
Submitted: 2012-12-24, last modified: 2013-07-31
Sources generating most of the X-ray background (XRB) are dispersed over a
wide range of redshifts. Thus, statistical characteristics of the source
distribution carry information on matter distribution on very large scales. We
test the possibility of detecting the variation in the X-ray source number
counts over the celestial sphere. A large number of Chandra pointings spread
over both galactic hemispheres are investigated. We searched for all the
point-like sources in the soft band of 0.5 - 2 keV and statistically assessed
the population of sources below the detection threshold. A homogeneous sample
of the number counts at fluxes above ~10^{-15} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2} was
constructed for more than 300 ACIS fields. The sources were counted within a
circular area of 15 arcmin diameter. The count correlations between overlapping
fields were used to assess the accuracy of the computational methods used in
the analysis. The average number of sources in the investigated sample amounts
to 46 per field. It is shown that the source number counts vary between fields
at a level exceeding the fluctuation amplitude expected for the random
(Poissonian) distribution. The excess fluctuations are attributed to the cosmic
variance generated by the large-scale structures. The rms variations of the
source counts due to the cosmic variance within the 15$ arcmin circle reach 8%
of the average number counts. An amplitude of the potential correlations of the
source counts on angular scales larger than the size of a single pointing
remains below the noise level.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.4356 [pdf] - 966394
Is the 2MASS clustering dipole convergent?
Submitted: 2011-02-21, last modified: 2011-08-02
There is a long-standing controversy about the convergence of the dipole
moment of the galaxy angular distribution (the so-called clustering dipole). We
study the growth of the clustering dipole of galaxies as a function of the
limiting flux of the sample from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).
Contrary to some earlier claims, we find that the dipole does not converge
before the completeness limit of the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog, i.e. up to
13.5 mag in the near-infrared K_s band (equivalent to an effective distance of
300 Mpc/h). We compare the observed growth of the dipole with the theoretically
expected, conditional one (i.e., given the velocity of the Local Group relative
to the CMB), for the LambdaCDM power spectrum and cosmological parameters
constrained by WMAP. The observed growth turns out to be within 1-sigma
confidence level of its theoretical counterpart once the proper observational
window of the 2MASS flux-limited catalog is included. For a contrast, if the
adopted window is a top-hat, then the predicted dipole grows significantly
faster and converges to its final value for a distance of about 300 Mpc/h. By
comparing the observational windows, we show that for a given flux limit and a
corresponding distance limit, the 2MASS flux-weighted window passes less
large-scale signal than the top-hat one. We conclude that the growth of the
2MASS dipole for effective distances greater than 200 Mpc/h is only apparent.
On the other hand, for a distance of 80 Mpc/h (mean depth of the 2MASS Redshift
Survey) and the LambdaCDM power spectrum, the true dipole is expected to reach
only ~80% of its final value. Eventually, since for the window function of
2MASS the predicted growth is consistent with the observed one, we can compare
the two to evaluate beta = (Omega_m)^0.55 / b. The result is beta = 0.38+-0.04,
which leads to an estimate of the density parameter Omega_m = 0.20+-0.08.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.3536 [pdf] - 1018415
The kinematic component of the cosmological redshift
Submitted: 2009-11-18, last modified: 2011-03-08
It is widely believed that the cosmological redshift is not a Doppler shift.
However, Bunn & Hogg have recently pointed out that to settle properly this
problem, one has to transport parallelly the velocity four-vector of a distant
galaxy to the observer's position. Performing such a transport along the null
geodesic of photons arriving from the galaxy, they found that the cosmological
redshift is purely kinematic. Here we argue that one should rather transport
the velocity four-vector along the geodesic connecting the points of
intersection of the world-lines of the galaxy and the observer with the
hypersurface of constant cosmic time. We find that the resulting relation
between the transported velocity and the redshift of arriving photons is not
given by a relativistic Doppler formula. Instead, for small redshifts it
coincides with the well known non-relativistic decomposition of the redshift
into a Doppler (kinematic) component and a gravitational one. We perform such a
decomposition for arbitrary large redshifts and derive a formula for the
kinematic component of the cosmological redshift, valid for any FLRW cosmology.
In particular, in a universe with Omega_m = 0.24 and Omega_Lambda = 0.76, a
quasar at a redshift 6, at the time of emission of photons reaching us today
had the recession velocity v = 0.997c. This can be contrasted with v = 0.96c,
had the redshift been entirely kinematic. Thus, for recession velocities of
such high-redshift sources, the effect of deceleration of the early Universe
clearly prevails over the effect of its relatively recent acceleration. Last
but not least, we show that the so-called proper recession velocities of
galaxies, commonly used in cosmology, are in fact radial components of the
galaxies' four-velocity vectors. As such, they can indeed attain superluminal
values, but should not be regarded as real velocities.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1006.0359 [pdf] - 319394
Is the 2MASS dipole convergent?
Submitted: 2010-06-02, last modified: 2010-06-08
We study the growth of the clustering dipole of galaxies from the Two Micron
All Sky Survey (2MASS). We find that the dipole does not converge before the
completeness limit of the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog, i.e. up to about 300
Mpc/h. We compare the observed growth of the dipole with the theoretically
expected, conditional growth for the LambdaCDM power spectrum and cosmological
parameters constrained by WMAP. The observed growth turns out to be within
1-sigma confidence level of the theoretical one, once the proper observational
window of the 2MASS flux dipole is included. For a contrast, if the adopted
window is a top hat, then the predicted dipole grows significantly faster and
converges to its final value at a distance of about 200 Mpc/h. We study the
difference between the top-hat window and the window for the flux-limited 2MASS
survey and we conclude that the growth of the 2MASS dipole at effective
distances greater than 200 Mpc/h is only apparent. Eventually, since for the
window function of 2MASS the predicted growth is consistent with the observed
one, we can compare the two to evaluate beta = (Omega_m)^0.55 / b. The result
is beta = 0.38+-0.05, which gives a rough estimate of Omega_m = 0.2+-0.1.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.4789 [pdf] - 204084
Influence of the Local Void on measurements of the clustering dipole
Submitted: 2010-01-26, last modified: 2010-03-31
In measurements of the clustering dipole from all-sky surveys, an important
problem is the lack of information about galaxy distribution in the so-called
Zone of Avoidance (ZoA). The existence of the Local Void (LV) has a systematic
effect on these measurements. If the ZoA is randomly filled with mock galaxies,
then the calculated acceleration of the Local Group of galaxies (LG) has a
spurious component, resulting from the lack of real galaxies in the
intersection of the LV with the ZoA. This component affects both the
misalignment angle between the clustering dipole and the CMB dipole, and the
inferred value of mean matter density Omega_m. We calculate the amplitude of
the spurious acceleration acting on the LG due to the LV. Its value depends on
the geometry and size of the LV, as well as on its density contrast. However,
under the simplest assumption of the LV being spherical and completely empty,
within the linear theory this amplitude amounts only to about 45 km/s in units
of velocity. The resulting change in the misalignment angle is smaller than 1
degree, and the fractional change in the deduced value of Omega_m is about 5%.
Accounting for observationally indicated elongation of the LV and maintaining
the maximising assumption of a complete lack of galaxies inside increases these
numbers only moderately. Specifically, the amplitude of the spurious
acceleration rises to about 60 km/s, the misalignment angle remains still
smaller than 1 degree, and the fractional change in the deduced value of
Omega_m is enhanced to about 7%. Thus, despite the overall importance of the
Local Void for the motion of the Local Group, the influence of the intersection
of the LV with the ZoA on measurements of the clustering dipole is found to be
only a minor systematic effect.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.3972 [pdf] - 19734
Eppur si muove
Submitted: 2008-12-20
In two recent papers, Abramowicz et al. claim that the expansion of the
Universe can be interpreted only as the expansion of space. In fact, what they
really prove is that the cosmological expansion cannot be described in terms of
real motions in Minkowski spacetime. However, there is no controversy about
this issue. Abramowicz et al. show that in general, the cosmological redshift
is not a Doppler shift and they consider this fact as a proof that space
expands. Again, nobody believes (perhaps except Milne) that for non-empty
universes the origin of the redshift is purely Dopplerian. From the Principle
of Equivalence it follows that there must be also a gravitational shift in
presence of matter. Indeed, it is well known in cosmology that for small
redshifts, the cosmological redshift can be decomposed into a Doppler component
and a gravitational component. In a forthcoming paper, we shall perform such a
decomposition for arbitrarily large values of the redshift.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.3513 [pdf] - 749673
The velocity-density relation in the spherical model
Submitted: 2008-09-21
We study the cosmic velocity-density relation using the spherical collapse
model (SCM) as a proxy to non-linear dynamics. Although the dependence of this
relation on cosmological parameters is known to be weak, we retain the density
parameter Omega_m in SCM equations, in order to study the limit Omega_m -> 0.
We show that in this regime the considered relation is strictly linear, for
arbitrary values of the density contrast, on the contrary to some claims in the
literature. On the other hand, we confirm that for realistic values of Omega_m
the exact relation in the SCM is well approximated by the classic formula of
Bernardeau (1992), both for voids (delta<0) and for overdensities up to delta ~
3. Inspired by this fact, we find further analytic approximations to the
relation for the whole range delta from -1 to infinity. Our formula for voids
accounts for the weak Omega_m-dependence of their maximal rate of expansion,
which for Omega_m < 1 is slightly smaller that 3/2. For positive density
contrasts, we find a simple relation div v = 3 H_0 (Omega_m)^(0.6) [
(1+delta)^(1/6) - (1+delta)^(1/2) ], that works very well up to the turn-around
(i.e. up to delta ~ 13.5 for Omega_m = 0.25 and neglected Omega_Lambda). Having
the same second-order expansion as the formula of Bernardeau, it can be
regarded as an extension of the latter for higher density contrasts. Moreover,
it gives a better fit to results of cosmological numerical simulations.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.1693 [pdf] - 314920
Cosmic velocity--gravity relation in redshift space
Submitted: 2008-05-12
We propose a simple way to estimate the parameter beta = Omega_m^(0.6)/b from
three-dimensional galaxy surveys. Our method consists in measuring the relation
between the cosmological velocity and gravity fields, and thus requires
peculiar velocity measurements. The relation is measured *directly in redshift
space*, so there is no need to reconstruct the density field in real space. In
linear theory, the radial components of the gravity and velocity fields in
redshift space are expected to be tightly correlated, with a slope given, in
the distant observer approximation, by g / v = (1 + 6 beta / 5 + 3 beta^2 /
7)^(1/2) / beta. We test extensively this relation using controlled numerical
experiments based on a cosmological N-body simulation. To perform the
measurements, we propose a new and rather simple adaptive interpolation scheme
to estimate the velocity and the gravity field on a grid. One of the most
striking results is that nonlinear effects, including `fingers of God', affect
mainly the tails of the joint probability distribution function (PDF) of the
velocity and gravity field: the 1--1.5 sigma region around the maximum of the
PDF is *dominated by the linear theory regime*, both in real and redshift
space. This is understood explicitly by using the spherical collapse model as a
proxy of nonlinear dynamics. Applications of the method to real galaxy catalogs
are discussed, including a preliminary investigation on homogeneous (volume
limited) `galaxy' samples extracted from the simulation with simple
prescriptions based on halo and sub-structure identification, to quantify the
effects of the bias between the galaxy and the total matter distibution, and of
shot noise (ABRIDGED).
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.0619 [pdf] - 1903
Towards the optimal window for the 2MASS dipole
Submitted: 2007-06-05, last modified: 2008-04-18
A comparison of the 2MASS flux dipole to the CMB dipole can serve as a method
to constrain a combination of the cosmological parameter Omega_m and the
luminosity bias of the 2MASS survey. For this constraint to be as tight as
possible, it is necessary to maximize the correlation between the two dipoles.
This can be achieved by optimizing the survey window through which the flux
dipole is measured. Here we explicitly construct such a window for the 2MASS
survey. The optimization in essence reduces to excluding from the calculation
of the flux dipole galaxies brighter than some limiting magnitude K_min of the
near-infrared K_s band. This exclusion mitigates nonlinear effects and shot
noise from small scales, which decorrelate the 2MASS dipole from the CMB
dipole. Under the assumption of negligible shot noise we find that the optimal
value of K_min is about five. Inclusion of shot noise shifts the optimal K_min
to larger values. We present an analytical formula for shot noise for the 2MASS
flux dipole, to be used in follow-up work with 2MASS data.
The misalignment angle between the two dipoles is a sensitive measure of
their correlation: the higher the correlation, the smaller the expectation
value of the angle. A minimum of the misalignment is thus a sign of the optimal
gravity window. We model analytically the distribution function for the
misalignment angle and show that the misalignment estimated by Maller et al. is
consistent with the assumed underlying model (though it is greater than the
expectation value). We predict with about 90% confidence that the misalignment
will decrease if 2MASS galaxies brighter than K_min = 5 mag are excluded from
the calculation of the flux dipole. This prediction has been indirectly
confirmed by the results of Erdogdu et al. (ABRIDGED)
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0610590 [pdf] - 86014
A direct consequence of the expansion of space?
Submitted: 2006-10-19, last modified: 2007-03-27
Consider radar ranging of a distant galaxy in a Friedman-Lemaitre
cosmological model. In this model the comoving coordinate of the galaxy is
constant, hence the equations of null geodesics for photons travelling to the
distant galaxy and back imply the following equation:
\int_{t_e}^{t_r} dt/a(t) = \int_{t_r}^{t_o} dt/a(t).
Here, t_e, t_r and t_o are respectively the times of emission, reflection and
observation of the reflected photons, and a(t) is the scale factor. Since the
universe is expanding, a(t) is a monotonically increasing function, so the
return travel time, t_o - t_r, must be greater than the forward travel time,
t_r - t_e. Clearly, space expands, and on their way back, the photons must
travel a longer distance! The present paper explains why this argument for the
expansion of space is wrong. We argue that, unlike the expansion of the cosmic
substratum, the expansion of space is unobservable. We therefore propose to
apply to it -- just like to the ether -- Ockham's razor.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601171 [pdf] - 79029
Is space really expanding? A counterexample
Submitted: 2006-01-09, last modified: 2006-07-03
In all Friedman models, the cosmological redshift is widely interpreted as a
consequence of the general-relativistic phenomenon of EXPANSION OF SPACE. Other
commonly believed consequences of this phenomenon are superluminal recession
velocities of distant galaxies and the distance to the particle horizon greater
than c*t (where t is the age of the Universe), in apparent conflict with
special relativity. Here, we study a particular Friedman model: empty universe.
This model exhibits both cosmological redshift, superluminal velocities and
infinite distance to the horizon. However, we show that the cosmological
redshift is there simply a relativistic Doppler shift. Moreover, apparently
superluminal velocities and `acausal' distance to the horizon are in fact a
direct consequence of special-relativistic phenomenon of time dilation, as well
as of the adopted definition of distance in cosmology. There is no conflict
with special relativity, whatsoever. In particular, INERTIAL recession
velocities are subluminal. Since in the real Universe, sufficiently distant
galaxies recede with relativistic velocities, these special-relativistic
effects must be at least partly responsible for the cosmological redshift and
the aforementioned `superluminalities', commonly attributed to the expansion of
space. Let us finish with a question resembling a Buddhism-Zen `koan': in an
empty universe, what is expanding?
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0503690 [pdf] - 72072
Cosmology under Milne's shadow
Submitted: 2005-03-31, last modified: 2005-09-13
Based on the magnitude--redshift diagram for the sample of supernovae Ia
analysed by Perlmutter et al. (1999), Davis & Lineweaver rule out the special
relativistic interpretation of cosmological redshifts at a confidence level of
23 sigma. Here, we critically reassess this result. Special relativity is known
to describe the dynamics of an empty universe, by means of the Milne kinematic
model. Applying only special-relativistic concepts, we derive the angular
diameter distance and the luminosity distance in the Milne model. In
particular, in this model we do not use the underlying metric in its
Robertson-Walker form, so our exposition is useful for readers without any
knowledge of general relativity. We do however, explicitly use the
special-relativistic Doppler formula for redshift. We apply the derived
luminosity distance to the magnitude--redshift diagram for supernovae Ia of
Perlmutter et al. (1999) and show that special relativity fits the data much
better than that claimed by Davis & Lineweaver. Specifically, using these data
alone, the Milne model is ruled out only at a 2 sigma level. Although not a
viable cosmological model, in the context of current research on supernovae Ia
it remains a useful reference model when comparing predictions of various
cosmological models.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407478 [pdf] - 66320
Superluminal apparent motions in distant radio sources
Submitted: 2004-07-22, last modified: 2005-01-14
We derive the prediction of the standard model of superluminal radio sources
for the apparent transverse velocity of a radio source located at redshift z.
The apparent velocity of the source is reduced by a factor of 1 + z compared to
that of a similar nearby source. The cause of this reduction is recession of
the distant source due to the expansion of the universe. The apparent velocity
of a source can be estimated from its redshift and proper motion using the
values of the Hubble constant and the mean densities of different energy
components in the universe. We derive an expression for the velocity valid for
the currently favored cosmological model: a flat universe with a nonzero
cosmological constant.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0401195 [pdf] - 62065
Likelihood analysis of the Local Group acceleration revisited
Submitted: 2004-01-12
We reexamine likelihood analyzes of the Local Group (LG) acceleration, paying
particular attention to nonlinear effects. Under the approximation that the
joint distribution of the LG acceleration and velocity is Gaussian, two
quantities describing nonlinear effects enter these analyzes. The first one is
the coherence function, i.e. the cross-correlation coefficient of the Fourier
modes of gravity and velocity fields. The second one is the ratio of velocity
power spectrum to gravity power spectrum. To date, in all analyzes of the LG
acceleration the second quantity was not accounted for. Extending our previous
work, we study both the coherence function and the ratio of the power spectra.
With the aid of numerical simulations we obtain expressions for the two as
functions of wavevector and \sigma_8. Adopting WMAP's best determination of
\sigma_8, we estimate the most likely value of the parameter \beta and its
errors. As the observed values of the LG velocity and gravity, we adopt
respectively a CMB-based estimate of the LG velocity, and Schmoldt et al.'s
(1999) estimate of the LG acceleration from the PSCz catalog. We obtain \beta =
0.66^{+0.21}_{-0.07}; thus our errorbars are significantly smaller than those
of Schmoldt et al. This is not surprising, because the coherence function they
used greatly overestimates actual decoherence between nonlinear gravity and
velocity.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310895 [pdf] - 60558
Precision Analysis of the Local Group Acceleration
Submitted: 2003-10-31
We reexamine likelihood analyses of the Local Group (LG) acceleration, paying
particular attention to nonlinear effects. Under the approximation that the
joint distribution of the LG acceleration and velocity is Gaussian, two
quantities describing nonlinear effects enter these analyses. The first one is
the coherence function, i.e. the cross-correlation coefficient of the Fourier
modes of gravity and velocity fields. The second one is the ratio of velocity
power spectrum to gravity power spectrum. To date, in all analyses of the LG
acceleration the second quantity was not accounted for. Extending our previous
work, we study both the coherence function and the ratio of the power spectra.
With the aid of numerical simulations we obtain expressions for the two as
functions of wavevector and sigma_8. Adopting WMAP's best determination of
sigma_8, we estimate the most likely value of the parameter beta and its
errors. As the observed values of the LG velocity and gravity, we adopt
respectively a CMB-based estimate of the LG velocity, and Schmoldt et al.'s
(1999) estimate of the LG acceleration from the PSCz catalog. We obtain beta =
0.66^{+0.21}_{-0.07}; thus our errorbars are significantly smaller than those
of Schmoldt et al. This is not surprising, because the coherence function they
used greatly overestimates actual decoherence between nonlinear gravity and
velocity.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0010364 [pdf] - 38711
Gaussianity of Cosmic Velocity Fields and Linearity of the
Velocity-Gravity Relation
Submitted: 2000-10-18, last modified: 2003-02-21
We present a numerical study of the relation between the cosmic peculiar
velocity field and the gravitational acceleration field. We show that on mildly
non-linear scales (4-10 Mpc Gaussian smoothing), the distribution of the
Cartesian coordinates of each of these fields is well approximated by a
Gaussian. In particular, their kurtoses and negentropies are small compared to
those of the velocity divergence and density fields. We find that at these
scales the relation between the velocity and gravity field follows linear
theory to good accuracy. Specifically, the systematic errors in
velocity-velocity comparisons due to assuming the linear model do not exceed 6%
in beta. To correct for them, we test various nonlinear estimators of velocity
from density. We show that a slight modification of the alpha-formula proposed
by Kudlicki et al. yields an estimator which is essentially unbiased and has a
small variance.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0202296 [pdf] - 47790
New era in likelihood analyses of the Local Group acceleration
Submitted: 2002-02-15
In maximum-likelihood analyses of the Local Group (LG) acceleration, the
object describing nonlinear effects is the coherence function (CF), i.e. the
cross-correlation coefficient of the Fourier modes of the velocity and gravity
fields. We study the CF both analytically, using perturbation theory, and
numerically, using a hydrodynamic code. The dependence of the function on
Omega_m and the shape of the power spectrum is very weak. The only cosmological
parameter that the CF is strongly sensitive to is the normalization sigma_8 of
the underlying density field. Perturbative approximation for the function turns
out to be accurate as long as sigma_8 is smaller than about 0.3. For higher
normalizations we provide an analytical fit for the CF as a function of sigma_8
and the wavevector. The characteristic decoherence scale which our formula
predicts is an order of magnitude smaller than that determined by Strauss et
al. This implies that present likelihood constraints on cosmological parameters
from analyses of the LG acceleration are significantly tighter than hitherto
reported.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0109291 [pdf] - 44790
Local Group velocity versus gravity: the coherence function
Submitted: 2001-09-18, last modified: 2001-11-19
In maximum-likelihood analyses of the Local Group (LG) acceleration, the
object describing nonlinear effects is the coherence function (CF), i.e. the
cross-correlation coefficient of the Fourier modes of the velocity and gravity
fields. We study the CF both analytically, using perturbation theory, and
numerically, using a hydrodynamic code. The dependence of the function on
Omega_m and the shape of the power spectrum is very weak. The only cosmological
parameter that the CF is strongly sensitive to is the normalization sigma_8 of
the underlying density field. Perturbative approximation for the function turns
out to be accurate as long as sigma_8 is smaller than about 0.3. For higher
normalizations we provide an analytical fit for the CF as a function of sigma_8
and the wavevector. The characteristic decoherence scale which our formula
predicts is an order of magnitude smaller than that determined by Strauss et
al. This implies that present likelihood constraints on cosmological parameters
from analyses of the LG acceleration are significantly tighter than hitherto
reported.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101078 [pdf] - 40216
Local Group Velocity Versus Gravity: Nonlinear Effects
Submitted: 2001-01-05
We use numerical simulations to study the relation between the velocity of
the Local Group and its gravitational acceleration. This relation serves as a
test for the kinematic origin of the CMB dipole and as a method for estimating
beta. We calculate the misalignment angle between the two vectors and compare
it to the observed value for the PSCz survey. The latter value is near the
upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the angle; therefore, the
nonlinear effects are unlikely to be responsible for the whole observed
misalignment. We also study the relation between the amplitudes of the LG
velocity and gravity vectors. In an Omega=1 Universe, the smoothed gravity of
the LG turns out to be a biased low estimator of the LG (unsmoothed) velocity.
In an Omega=0.3 Universe, the estimator is biased high. The discussed biases
are, however, only a few per cent, thus the linear theory works to good
accuracy. The gravity-based estimator of the LG velocity has also a scatter
that limits the precision of the estimate of beta in the LG velocity-gravity
comparisons. The random error of beta due to nonlinear effects amounts to
several per cent.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908246 [pdf] - 1235374
Comparing the redshift-space density field to the real-space velocity
field
Submitted: 1999-08-23, last modified: 2000-05-19
I derive a nonlinear local relation between the redshift-space density field
and the real-space velocity field. The relation accounts for radial character
of redshift distortions, and it is not restricted to the limit of the distant
observer. Direct comparisons between the observed redshift-space density fields
and the real-space velocity fields possess all of the advantages of the
conventional redshift-space analyses, while at the same time they are free of
their disadvantages. In particular, neither the model-dependent reconstruction
of the density field in real space is necessary, nor is the reconstruction of
the nonlinear velocity field in redshift space, questionable because of its
vorticity at second order. The nonlinear redshift-space velocity field is
irrotational only in the distant observer limit, and that limit is not a good
approximation for shallow catalogs of peculiar velocities currently available.
Unlike the conventional redshift-space comparisons, the comparison proposed
here does not have to be restricted to the linear regime. Accounting for
nonlinear effects removes one of the sources of bias in the estimate of beta.
Moreover, the nonlinear effects break the Omega-bias degeneracy plaguing all
analyses based on linear theory.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905328 [pdf] - 106654
On the vorticity of flow in redshift space
Submitted: 1999-05-26, last modified: 1999-10-07
Given an irrotational (vorticity free) velocity field in real space, we prove
that, in the distant observer limit and in the absence of multi-valued zones,
the associated velocity field in redshift space is also irrotational. The proof
does not rely on any approximation to gravitational dynamics. The result can be
particularly useful for the analysis of redshift distortions and for
reconstruction methods of cosmological velocity fields from galaxy redshift
surveys, in the nonlinear regime. Although the proof is restricted to the
distant observer limit, we show that the POTENT method can be modified to
derive the full real space velocity field as a function of the redshift space
coordinate, thus avoiding spatial Malmquist biases.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9910018 [pdf] - 108572
Reconstructing Cosmic Peculiar Velocities from the Mildly Nonlinear
Density Field
Submitted: 1999-10-01
We present a numerical study of the cosmic density vs. velocity divergence
relation (DVDR) in the mildly non-linear regime. We approximate the dark matter
as a non-relativistic pressureless fluid, and solve its equations of motion on
a grid fixed in comoving coordinates. Unlike N-body schemes, this method yields
directly the volume-averaged velocity field. The results of our simulations are
compared with the predictions of the third-order perturbation theory (3PT) for
the DVDR. We investigate both the mean `forward' relation (density in terms of
velocity divergence) and the mean `inverse' relation (velocity divergence in
terms of density), with emphasis on the latter. On scales larger than about 20
megaparsecs, our code recovers the predictions of 3PT remarkably well,
significantly better than recent N-body simulations. On scales of a few
megaparsecs, the DVDR predicted by 3PT differs slightly from the simulated one.
In particular, approximating the inverse DVDR by a third-order polynomial turns
out to be a poor fit. We propose a simple analytical description of the inverse
relation, which works well for mildly non-linear scales.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908299 [pdf] - 107971
Redshift-space density versus real-space velocity comparison
Submitted: 1999-08-27
I propose to compare the redshift-space density field directly to the
REAL-SPACE velocity field. Such a comparison possesses all of the advantages of
the conventional redshift-space analyses, while at the same time it is free of
their disadvantages. In particular, the model-dependent reconstruction of the
density field in real space is unnecessary, and so is the reconstruction of the
velocity field in redshift space. The redshift-space velocity field can be
reconstructed only at the linear order, because only at this order it is
irrotational. Unlike the conventional redshift-space density--velocity
comparisons, the comparison proposed here does not have to be restricted to the
linear regime. Nonlinear effects can then be used to break the Omega-bias
degeneracy plaguing the analyses based on the linear theory. I present a
degeneracy-breaking method for the case of nonlinear but local bias.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9901057 [pdf] - 104651
Nonlinearity and stochasticity in the density--velocity relation
Submitted: 1999-01-06, last modified: 1999-06-27
We present results of the investigations of the statistical properties of a
joint density and velocity divergence probability distribution function (PDF)
in the mildly non-linear regime. For that purpose we use both perturbation
theory results, extended here for a top-hat filter, and numerical simulations.
In particular we derive the quantitative (complete as possible up to third
order terms) and qualitative predictions for constrained averages and
constrained dispersions -- which describe the nonlinearities and the
stochasticity properties beyond the linear regime -- and compare them against
numerical simulations. We find overall a good agreement for constrained
averages; however, the agreement for constrained dispersions is only
qualitative. Scaling relations for the Omega-dependence of these quantities are
satisfactory reproduced.
Guided by our analytical and numerical results, we finally construct a robust
phenomenological description of the joint PDF in a closed analytic form. The
good agreement of our formula with results of N-body simulations for a number
of cosmological parameters provides a sound validation of the presented
approach.
Our results provide a basis for a potentially powerful tool with which it is
possible to analyze galaxy survey data in order to test the gravitational
instability paradigm beyond the linear regime and put useful constraints on
cosmological parameters. In particular we show how the nonlinearity in the
density--velocity relation can be used to break the so-called Omega-bias
degeneracy in cosmic density-velocity comparisons.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9812075 [pdf] - 104182
Towards breaking the Omega-bias degeneracy in density--velocity
comparisons
Submitted: 1998-12-03, last modified: 1999-04-23
I derive a second-order local relation between the REDSHIFT-space mass
density field and the REAL-space velocity field. This relation can be useful
for comparisons between the cosmic density and peculiar velocity fields, for a
number of reasons. First, relating the real-space velocity directly to the
redshift-space density enables one to avoid the Omega-dependent reconstruction
of the density field in real space. Secondly, the reconstruction of the
three-dimensional velocity field in redshift space, questionable because of its
vorticity, is also unnecessary. Finally, a similar relation between the GALAXY
density field and the velocity field offers a way to break the Omega-bias
degeneracy in density--velocity comparisons, when combined with an additional
measurement of the redshift-space galaxy skewness. I derive the latter relation
under the assumption of nonlinear but local bias; accounting for stochasticity
of bias is left for further study.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802050 [pdf] - 1235188
Recovery of the Cosmological Peculiar Velocity from the Density Field in
the Weakly Nonlinear Regime
Submitted: 1998-02-04, last modified: 1998-08-14
Using third-order perturbation theory, we derive a relation between the mean
divergence of the peculiar velocity given density and the density itself. Our
calculations assume Gaussian initial conditions and are valid for Gaussian
filtering of the evolved density and velocity fields. The mean velocity
divergence turns out to be a third-order polynomial in the density contrast. We
test the power spectrum dependence of the coefficients of the polynomial for
scale-free and standard CDM spectra and find it rather weak. Over scales larger
than about 5 megaparsecs, the scatter in the relation is small compared to that
introduced by random errors in the observed density and velocity fields. The
relation can be useful for recovering the peculiar velocity from the associated
density field, and also for non-linear analyses of the anisotropies of
structure in redshift surveys.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9806087 [pdf] - 101680
Cosmological density versus velocity-divergence relation in the
Zel'dovich approximation
Submitted: 1998-06-05
I derive a relation, both `forward' and `inverse', between the density and
the divergence of the peculiar velocity which results from the Zel'dovich
approximation. My calculations assume Gaussian initial conditions. The forward
relation expresses the density (strictly speaking, the expectation value of the
continuity density given the velocity divergence) in terms of the velocity
divergence, while the inverse relation expresses the velocity divergence in
terms of the density. The predicted scatter in the relations is small, hence
the inverse relation is close to, though not identical with, a mathematical
inversion of the forward one. The forward relation is equivalent to the
well-known `standard' density--velocity relation in the Zel'dovich
approximation. The inverse relation, however, is successfully derived for the
first time and constitutes a potentially interesting alternative to an inverse
relation derived by Chodorowski et al., based on third-order perturbation
theory. Specifically, it may better recover the peculiar velocity from the
associated density field, when smoothed over scales as small as a few
megaparsecs.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803191 [pdf] - 100726
Large-Scale Density--Velocity Relations
Submitted: 1998-03-17
I present recent progress in theoretical modelling of cosmological
density--velocity relations in the weakly nonlinear regime. The relations are
local, based on rigorous perturbation theory and include the effects of
smoothing of the density and the velocity fields. For small smoothing scales,
they can be improved by slight adjustments based on N-body results. The
relations can be useful for density--velocity comparisons, yielding a fair
estimate of Omega and offering a method for disentangling Omega and bias.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9704048 [pdf] - 1234952
Large-scale density from velocity expansion and shear
Submitted: 1997-04-04, last modified: 1997-09-04
I derive up to second order in Eulerian perturbation theory a new relation
between the weakly nonlinear density and velocity fields. In the case of
unsmoothed fields, density at a given point turns out to be a purely local
function of the expansion (divergence) and shear of the velocity field. The
relation depends on the cosmological parameter Omega, strongly by the factor
f(Omega) = Omega^{0.6} and weakly by the factors K(Omega) and C(Omega)
proportional to Omega^{-2/63} and Omega^{-1/21} respectively. The Gramann
solution is found to be equivalent to the derived relation with the weak
Omega-dependence neglected. To make the relation applicable to the real world,
I extend it for the case of smoothed fields. The resulting formula, when
averaged over shear given divergence, reproduces up to second order the
density-velocity divergence relation of Chodorowski & Lokas; however, it has
smaller spread. It makes the formula a new attractive local estimator of
large-scale density from velocity.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9606088 [pdf] - 1234684
Weakly Nonlinear Density-Velocity Relation
Submitted: 1996-06-14, last modified: 1997-03-07
We rigorously derive weakly nonlinear relation between cosmic density and
velocity fields up to third order in perturbation theory. The density field is
described by the mass density contrast, $\de$. The velocity field is described
by the variable $\te$ proportional to the velocity divergence, $\te = -
f(\Omega)^{-1} H_0^{-1} \nabla\cdot\bfv$, where $f(\Omega) \simeq
\Omega^{0.6}$, $\Omega$ is the cosmological density parameter and $H_0$ is the
Hubble constant. Our calculations show that mean $\de$ given $\te$ is a third
order polynomial in $\te$, $\lan \de \ran|_{\te} = a_1 \te + a_2 (\te^2 -
\s_\te^2) + a_3 \te^3$. This result constitutes an extension of the formula
$\lan \de \ran|_{\te} = \te + a_2 (\te^2 - \s_\te^2)$, found by
Bernardeau~(1992) which involved second order perturbative solutions. Third
order perturbative corrections introduce the cubic term. They also, however,
cause the coefficient $a_1$ to depart from unity, in contrast with the linear
theory prediction. We compute the values of the coefficients $a_p$ for
scale-free power spectra, as well as for standard CDM, for Gaussian smoothing.
The coefficients obey a hierarchy $a_3 \ll a_2 \ll a_1$, meaning that the
perturbative series converges very fast. Their dependence on $\Omega$ is
expected to be very weak. The values of the coefficients for CDM spectrum are
in qualitative agreement with the results of N-body simulations by Ganon et al.
(1996). The results provide a method for breaking the $\Omega$-bias degeneracy
in comparisons of cosmic density and velocity fields such as IRAS-POTENT.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9507038 [pdf] - 1234427
Kurtosis in Large-Scale Structure as a Constraint on Non-Gaussian
Initial Conditions
Submitted: 1995-07-11
We calculate the kurtosis of a large-scale density field which has undergone
weakly non-linear gravitational evolution from arbitrary non-Gaussian initial
conditions. It is well known that the weakly evolved {\twelveit skewness} is
equal to its initial value plus the term induced by gravity, which scales with
the rms density fluctuation in precisely the same way as for Gaussian initial
conditions. As in the case of skewness, the evolved {\twelveit kurtosis} is
equal to its initial value plus the contribution induced by gravity. The
scaling of this induced contribution, however, turns out to be qualitatively
different for Gaussian versus non-Gaussian initial conditions. Therefore,
measurements of the kurtosis can serve as a powerful discriminating test
between the hypotheses of Gaussian and non-Gaussian nature of primordial
density fluctuations.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9308012 [pdf] - 90877
Weakly Non-Linear Gaussian Fluctuations and the Edgeworth Expansion
Submitted: 1993-08-09
We calculate the cosmological evolution of the 1-point probability
distribution function (PDF), using an analytic approximation that combines
gravitational perturbation theory with the Edgeworth expansion of the PDF. Our
method applies directly to a smoothed mass density field or to the divergence
of a smoothed peculiar velocity field, provided that rms fluctuations are small
compared to unity on the smoothing scale, and that the primordial fluctuations
that seed the growth of structure are Gaussian. We use this `Edgeworth
approximation' to compute the evolution of $<\delta|\delta|>$ and $<|delta|>$;
these measures are similar to the skewness and kurtosis of the density field,
but they are less sensitive to tails of the probability distribution, so they
may be more accurately estimated from surveys of limited volume. We compare our
analytic calculations to cosmological N-body simulations in order to assess
their range of validity. When $\sigma \ll 1$, the numerical simulations and
perturbation theory agree precisely, demonstrating that the N-body method can
yield accurate results in the regime of weakly non-linear clustering. We show
analytically that `biased' galaxy formation preserves the relation $<\delta^3>
\propto <\delta^2>^2$ predicted by second-order perturbation theory, provided
that the galaxy density is a local function of the underlying mass density.