Normalized to: Chi, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.02900 [pdf] - 1300165
The Dark Energy Camera
Flaugher, B.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Honscheid, K.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alvarez, O.;
Angstadt, R.;
Annis, J. T.;
Antonik, M.;
Ballester, O.;
Beaufore, L.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bigelow, B.;
Bonati, M.;
Boprie, D.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E. J.;
Campa, J.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castilla, J.;
Cease, H.;
Cela-Ruiz, J. M.;
Chappa, S.;
Chi, E.;
Cooper, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Dede, E.;
Derylo, G.;
DePoy, D. L.;
de Vicente, J.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eiting, J.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Emes, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Finley, D. A.;
Flores, R.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gladders, M. D.;
Gregory, B.;
Gutierrez, G. R.;
Hao, J.;
Holland, S. E.;
Holm, S.;
Huffman, D.;
Jackson, C.;
James, D. J.;
Jonas, M.;
Karcher, A.;
Karliner, I.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kozlovsky, M.;
Kron, R. G.;
Kubik, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuk, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lathrop, A.;
Lee, J.;
Levi, M. E.;
Lewis, P.;
Li, T. S.;
Mandrichenko, I.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martinez, G.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miquel, R.;
Munoz, F.;
Neilsen, E. H.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Olsen, J.;
Palio, N.;
Patton, K.;
Peoples, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rauch, J.;
Reil, K.;
Rheault, J. -P.;
Roe, N. A.;
Rogers, H.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R. H.;
Schmidt, R.;
Schmitt, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Schultz, K.;
Schurter, P.;
Scott, L.;
Serrano, S.;
Shaw, T. M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Stefanik, A.;
Stuermer, W.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sypniewski, A.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Tighe, R.;
Tran, C.;
Tucker, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, G.;
Watson, M.;
Weaverdyck, C.;
Wester, W.;
Woods, R.;
Yanny, B.
Submitted: 2015-04-11
The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of
view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on
Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by
the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent
requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the
collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five element optical corrector,
seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a CCD focal plane of 250
micron thick fully-depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 Mpixel
focal plane comprises 62 2kx4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2kx2k CCDs for guiding
and focus. The CCDs have 15 microns x15 microns pixels with a plate scale of
0.263 arc sec per pixel. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and
alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 seconds with 6-9 electrons
readout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the camera's
engineering, construction, installation, and current status.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.6520 [pdf] - 1390585
Estimating a Common Period for a Set of Irregularly Sampled Functions
with Applications to Periodic Variable Star Data
Submitted: 2014-12-19
We consider the estimation of a common period for a set of functions sampled
at irregular intervals. The problem arises in astronomy, where the functions
represent a star's brightness observed over time through different photometric
filters. While current methods can estimate periods accurately provided that
the brightness is well--sampled in at least one filter, there are no existing
methods that can provide accurate estimates when no brightness function is
well--sampled. In this paper we introduce two new methods for period estimation
when brightnesses are poorly--sampled in all filters. The first, multiband
generalized Lomb-Scargle (MGLS), extends the frequently used Lomb-Scargle
method in a way that na\"{i}vely combines information across filters. The
second, penalized generalized Lomb-Scargle (PGLS), builds on the first by more
intelligently borrowing strength across filters. Specifically, we incorporate
constraints on the phases and amplitudes across the different functions using a
non--convex penalized likelihood function. We develop a fast algorithm to
optimize the penalized likelihood by combining block coordinate descent with
the majorization-minimization (MM) principle. We illustrate our methods on
synthetic and real astronomy data. Both advance the state-of-the-art in period
estimation; however, PGLS significantly outperforms MGLS when all functions are
extremely poorly--sampled.