Normalized to: Charra, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05645 [pdf] - 1810141
PILOT balloon-borne experiment in-flight performance
Mangilli, A.;
Foënard, G.;
Aumont, J.;
Hughes, A.;
Mot, B.;
Bernard, J-Ph.;
Lacourt, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Longval, Y.;
Ade, P.;
André, Y.;
Bautista, L.;
deBernardis, P.;
Boulade, O.;
Bousqet, F.;
Bouzit, M.;
Buttice, V.;
Charra, M.;
Crane, B.;
Doumayrou, E.;
Dubois, J. P.;
Engel, C.;
Griffin, M.;
Grabarnik, S.;
Hargrave, P.;
Laureijs, R.;
Leriche, B.;
Maestre, S.;
Maffei, B.;
Marty, C.;
Marty, W.;
Masi, S.;
Misawa, R.;
Montel, J.;
Montier, L.;
Narbonne, J.;
Pajot, F.;
Pérot, E.;
Pimentao, J.;
Pisano, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Rodriguez, L.;
Roudil, G.;
Salatino, M.;
Savini, G.;
Simonella, O.;
Saccoccio, M.;
Stever, S.;
Tauber, J.;
Tibbs, C.;
Tucker, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-16, last modified: 2019-01-07
The Polarized Instrument for Long-wavelength Observation of the Tenuous
interstellar medium (PILOT) is a balloon-borne experiment aiming at measuring
the polarized emission of thermal dust at a wavelength of 240 mm (1.2 THz). A
first PILOT flight (flight#1) of the experiment took place from Timmins,
Ontario, Canada, in September 2015 and a second flight (flight#2) took place
from Alice Springs, Australia in april 2017. In this paper, we present the
inflight performance of the instrument during these two flights. We concentrate
on performances during flight#2, but allude to flight#1 performances if
significantly different. We first present a short description of the instrument
and the flights. We determine the time constants of our detectors combining
inflight information from the signal decay following high energy particle
impacts (glitches) and of our internal calibration source. We use these time
constants to deconvolve the data timelines and analyse the optical quality of
the instrument as measured on planets. We then analyse the structure and
polarization of the instrumental background. We measure the detector response
flat field and its time variations using the signal from the residual
atmosphere and of our internal calibration source. Finally, we analyze the
detector noise spectral and temporal properties. The in-flight performances are
found to be satisfactory and globally in line with expectations from ground
calibrations. We conclude by assessing the expected in-flight sensitivity of
the instrument in light of the above in-flight performances.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.5760 [pdf] - 885266
PILOT: a balloon-borne experiment to measure the polarized FIR emission
of dust grains in the interstellar medium
Misawa, R.;
Bernard, J-Ph.;
Ade, P.;
Andre, Y.;
deBernardis, P.;
Bouzit, M.;
Charra, M.;
Crane, B.;
Dubois, J. P.;
Engel, C.;
Griffin, M.;
Hargrave, P.;
Leriche, B.;
Longval, Y.;
Maes, S.;
Marty, C.;
Marty, W.;
Masi, S.;
Mot, B.;
Narbonne, J.;
Pajot, F.;
Pisano, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rodriguez, L.;
Roudil, G.;
Salatino, M.;
Savini, G.;
Tucker, C.
Submitted: 2014-10-13
Future cosmology space missions will concentrate on measuring the
polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background, which potentially carries
invaluable information about the earliest phases of the evolution of our
universe. Such ambitious projects will ultimately be limited by the sensitivity
of the instrument and by the accuracy at which polarized foreground emission
from our own Galaxy can be subtracted out. We present the PILOT balloon project
which will aim at characterizing one of these foreground sources, the
polarization of the dust continuum emission in the diffuse interstellar medium.
The PILOT experiment will also constitute a test-bed for using multiplexed
bolometer arrays for polarization measurements. We present the results of
ground tests obtained just before the first flight of the instrument.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6592 [pdf] - 873816
Impact of particles on the Planck HFI detectors: Ground-based
measurements and physical interpretation
Catalano, A.;
Ade, P.;
Atik, Y.;
Benoit, A.;
Bréele, E.;
Bock, J. J.;
Camus, P.;
Chabot, M.;
Charra, M.;
Crill, B. P.;
Coron, N.;
Coulais, A.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Fauvet, L.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Guillaudin, O.;
Holmes, W.;
Jones, W. C.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Macías-Pérez, J.;
Martinez, M.;
Miniussi, A.;
Monfardini, A.;
Pajot, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pelissier, A.;
Piat, M.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Renault, C.;
Rosset, C.;
Santos, D.;
Sauvé, A.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sudiwala, R.
Submitted: 2014-03-26, last modified: 2014-09-02
The Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI) surveyed the sky continuously from
August 2009 to January 2012. Its noise and sensitivity performance were
excellent, but the rate of cosmic ray impacts on the HFI detectors was
unexpectedly high. Furthermore, collisions of cosmic rays with the focal plane
produced transient signals in the data (glitches) with a wide range of
characteristics. A study of cosmic ray impacts on the HFI detector modules has
been undertaken to categorize and characterize the glitches, to correct the HFI
time-ordered data, and understand the residual effects on Planck maps and data
products. This paper presents an evaluation of the physical origins of glitches
observed by the HFI detectors. In order to better understand the glitches
observed by HFI in flight, several ground-based experiments were conducted with
flight-spare HFI bolometer modules. The experiments were conducted between 2010
and 2013 with HFI test bolometers in different configurations using varying
particles and impact energies. The bolometer modules were exposed to 23 MeV
protons from the Orsay IPN TANDEM accelerator, and to $^{241}$Am and $^{244}$Cm
$\alpha$-particle and $^{55}$Fe radioactive X-ray sources. The calibration data
from the HFI ground-based preflight tests were used to further characterize the
glitches and compare glitch rates with statistical expectations under
laboratory conditions. Test results provide strong evidence that the dominant
family of glitches observed in flight are due to cosmic ray absorption by the
silicon die substrate on which the HFI detectors reside. Glitch energy is
propagated to the thermistor by ballistic phonons, while there is also a
thermal diffusion contribution. The implications of these results for future
satellite missions, especially those in the far-infrared to sub-millimetre and
millimetre regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, are discussed.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.5639 [pdf] - 800803
Characterization and Physical Explanation of Energetic Particles on
Planck HFI Instrument
Catalano, A.;
Ade, P.;
Atik, Y.;
Benoit, A.;
Bréele, E.;
Bock, J. J.;
Camus, P.;
Charra, M.;
Crill, B. P.;
Coron, N.;
Coulais, A.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Fauvet, L.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Guillaudin, O.;
Holmes, W.;
Jones, W. C.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Macías-Pérez, J.;
Martinez, M.;
Miniussi, A.;
Monfardini, A.;
Pajot, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pelissier, A.;
Piat, M.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Renault, C.;
Rosset, C.;
Santos, D.;
Sauvé, A.;
Spencer, L.;
Sudiwala, R.
Submitted: 2014-03-22
The Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI) has been surveying the sky
continuously from the second Lagrangian point (L2) between August 2009 and
January 2012. It operates with 52 high impedance bolometers cooled at 100mK in
a range of frequency between 100 GHz and 1THz with unprecedented sensivity, but
strong coupling with cosmic radiation. At L2, the particle flux is about 5
$cm^{-2} s^{-1}$ and is dominated by protons incident on the spacecraft.
Protons with an energy above 40MeV can penetrate the focal plane unit box
causing two different effects: glitches in the raw data from direct interaction
of cosmic rays with detectors (producing a data loss of about 15% at the end of
the mission) and thermal drifts in the bolometer plate at 100mK adding
non-gaussian noise at frequencies below 0.1Hz. The HFI consortium has made
strong efforts in order to correct for this effect on the time ordered data and
final Planck maps. This work intends to give a view of the physical explanation
of the glitches observed in the HFI instrument in-flight. To reach this goal,
we performed several ground-based experiments using protons and $\alpha$
particles to test the impact of particles on the HFI spare bolometers with a
better control of the environmental conditions with respect to the in-flight
data. We have shown that the dominant part of glitches observed in the data
comes from the impact of cosmic rays in the silicon die frame supporting the
micro-machinced bolometric detectors propagating energy mainly by ballistic
phonons and by thermal diffusion. The implications of these results for future
satellite missions will be discussed.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.2029 [pdf] - 689677
In-flight calibration and verification of the Planck-LFI instrument
Gregorio, Anna;
Cuttaia, Francesco;
Mennella, Aniello;
Bersanelli, Marco;
Maris, Michele;
Meinhold, Peter;
Sandri, Maura;
Terenzi, Luca;
Tomasi, Maurizio;
Villa, Fabrizio;
Frailis, Marco;
Morgante, Gianluca;
Pearson, Dave;
Zacchei, Andrea;
Battaglia, Paola;
Butler, Reginald Christophe;
Davis, Richard;
Franceschet, Cristian;
Franceschi, Enrico;
Galeotta, Samuele;
Leonardi, Rodrigo;
Lowe, Steve;
Mandolesi, Nazzareno;
Melot, Frederick;
Mendes, Luis;
Stassi, Patrick;
Stringhetti, Luca;
Tavagnacco, Daniele;
Zonca, Andrea;
Wilkinson, Althea;
Wilson, Philip;
Charra, Maryse;
Maciaszek, Thierry;
Foley, Steve;
Watson, Christopher J.;
Casale, Mauro;
Laureijs, René;
Tauber, Jan;
Texier, Damien;
Baker, Michelle;
Cuevas, Leticia Perez;
Krassenburg, Mike;
Rihet, Patrick
Submitted: 2013-07-08
In this paper we discuss the Planck-LFI in-flight calibration campaign. After
a brief overview of the ground test campaigns, we describe in detail the
calibration and performance verification (CPV) phase, carried out in space
during and just after the cool-down of LFI. We discuss in detail the
functionality verification, the tuning of the front-end and warm electronics,
the preliminary performance assessment and the thermal susceptibility tests.
The logic, sequence, goals and results of the in-flight tests are discussed.
All the calibration activities were successfully carried out and the instrument
response was comparable to the one observed on ground. For some channels the
in-flight tuning activity allowed us to improve significantly the noise
performance.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2023 [pdf] - 955968
Planck Early Results. II. The thermal performance of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Baker, M.;
Balbi, A.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Bernard, J. P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhandari, P.;
Bhatia, R.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borders, J.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bowman, B.;
Bradshaw, T.;
Breelle, E.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cabella, P.;
Camus, P.;
Cantalupo, C. M.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. F.;
Catalano, A.;
Cayon, L.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chambelland, J. P.;
Charra, J.;
Charra, M.;
Chiang, L. Y;
Chiang, C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Collaudin, B.;
Colombi, S.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Crook, M.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Damasio, C.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Gasperis, G.;
de Rosa, A.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. M.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Doerl, U.;
Dolag, K.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Enslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fourmond, J. J.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gavila, E.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guyot, G.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Hoyland, R. J.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Israelsson, U.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knox, L.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. M.;
Lami, P.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leach, S.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leroy, C.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maciaszek, T.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Maris, M.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melot, F.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Mora, J.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nash, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Osborne, S.;
Pajot, F.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, D.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Poutanen, T.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prina, M.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rubiino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, P.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stassi, P.;
Stivoli, F.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Wilson, P.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11, last modified: 2012-01-02
The performance of the Planck instruments in space is enabled by their low
operating temperatures, 20K for LFI and 0.1K for HFI, achieved through a
combination of passive radiative cooling and three active mechanical coolers.
The scientific requirement for very broad frequency coverage led to two
detector technologies with widely different temperature and cooling needs.
Active coolers could satisfy these needs; a helium cryostat, as used by
previous cryogenic space missions (IRAS, COBE, ISO, Spitzer, AKARI), could not.
Radiative cooling is provided by three V-groove radiators and a large telescope
baffle. The active coolers are a hydrogen sorption cooler (<20K), a 4He
Joule-Thomson cooler (4.7K), and a 3He-4He dilution cooler (1.4K and 0.1K). The
flight system was at ambient temperature at launch and cooled in space to
operating conditions. The HFI bolometer plate reached 93mK on 3 July 2009, 50
days after launch. The solar panel always faces the Sun, shadowing the rest of
Planck, andoperates at a mean temperature of 384K. At the other end of the
spacecraft, the telescope baffle operates at 42.3K and the telescope primary
mirror operates at 35.9K. The temperatures of key parts of the instruments are
stabilized by both active and passive methods. Temperature fluctuations are
driven by changes in the distance from the Sun, sorption cooler cycling and
fluctuations in gas-liquid flow, and fluctuations in cosmic ray flux on the
dilution and bolometer plates. These fluctuations do not compromise the science
data.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.2039 [pdf] - 1051324
Planck early results: first assessment of the High Frequency Instrument
in-flight performance
Planck HFI Core Team;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Ansari, R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Banday, A. J.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benot, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bhatia, R.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bradshaw, T.;
Brelle, E.;
Bucher, M.;
Camus, P.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Charra, J.;
Charra, M.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, C.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Cressiot, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Crook, M.;
de Bernardis, P.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eng, P.;
Filliard, C.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fourmond, J. -J.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Girard, D.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gispert, R.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Griffin, M.;
Guyot, G.;
Haissinski, J.;
Harrison, D.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hills, R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Huenberger, K. M.;
Jae, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Kaplan, J.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knox, L.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lami, P.;
Lange, A. E.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lavabre, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leriche, B.;
Leroy, C.;
Longval, Y.;
Macas-Perez, J. F.;
Maciaszek, T.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maei, B.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mann, R.;
Mansoux, B.;
Masi, S.;
Matsumura, T.;
McGehee, P.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mercier, C.;
Miville-Deschnes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Mortlock, D.;
Murphy, A.;
Nati, F.;
Nettereld, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
North, C.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Osborne, S.;
Paine, C.;
Pajot, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peacocke, T.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Pons, R.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Reach, W. T.;
Renault, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rusholme, B.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Shellard, P.;
Spencer, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stassi, P.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Thum, C.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Touze, F.;
Tristram, M.;
Van Leeuwen, F.;
Vibert, L.;
Vibert, D.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wiesemeyer, H.;
Woodcraft, A.;
Yurchenko, V.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.
Submitted: 2011-01-11
The Planck High Frequency Instrument (HFI) is designed to measure the
temperature and polarization anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
and galactic foregrounds in six wide bands centered at 100, 143, 217, 353, 545
and 857 GHz at an angular resolution of 10' (100 GHz), 7' (143 GHz), and 5'
(217 GHz and higher). HFI has been operating flawlessly since launch on 14 May
2009. The bolometers cooled to 100 mK as planned. The settings of the readout
electronics, such as the bolometer bias current, that optimize HFI's noise
performance on orbit are nearly the same as the ones chosen during ground
testing. Observations of Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn verified both the optical
system and the time response of the detection chains. The optical beams are
close to predictions from physical optics modeling. The time response of the
detection chains is close to pre-launch measurements. The detectors suffer from
an unexpected high flux of cosmic rays related to low solar activity. Due to
the redundancy of Planck's observations strategy, the removal of a few percent
of data contaminated by glitches does not affect significantly the sensitivity.
The cosmic rays heat up significantly the bolometer plate and the modulation on
periods of days to months of the heat load creates a common drift of all
bolometer signals which do not affect the scientific capabilities. Only the
high energy cosmic rays showers induce inhomogeneous heating which is a
probable source of low frequency noise.