Present-day multi-wavelength deep imaging surveys allow to characterise the outskirts of galaxies with unprecedented precision. Taking advantage of this situation, we define a new physically motivated measurement of size for galaxies based on the expected location of the gas density threshold for star formation. Employing both theoretical and observational arguments, we use the stellar mass density contour at 1 $M_{\rm \odot}$ pc$^{-2}$ as a proxy for this density threshold for star formation. This choice makes our size definition operative. With this new size measure, the intrinsic scatter of the global stellar mass ($M_{\rm \star}$) - size relation (explored over five orders of magnitude in stellar mass) decreases to $\sim$0.06 dex. This value is 2.5 times smaller than the scatter measured using the effective radius ($\sim$0.15 dex) and between 1.5 and 1.8 times smaller than those using other traditional size indicators such as $R_{\rm 23.5,i}$ ($\sim$0.09 dex), the Holmberg radius $R_{\rm H}$ ($\sim$0.09 dex) and the half-mass radius $R_{\rm e,M_{\star}}$ ($\sim$0.11 dex). Moreover, galaxies with 10$^7$ $M_{\rm \odot} <$ $M_{\star} < 10^{11}$ $M_{\rm \odot}$ increase monotonically in size following a power-law with a slope very close to 1/3, equivalent to an average stellar mass 3D density of $\sim$4.5$\times$10$^{-3}$ $M_{\rm \odot}$ pc$^{-3}$ for galaxies within this mass range. Galaxies with $M_{\rm \star}$$>$10$^{11}$ $M_{\rm \odot}$ show a different slope with stellar mass, which is suggestive of a larger gas density threshold for star formation at the epoch when their star formation peaks.

Now almost 70 years since its introduction, the effective or half-light radius has become a very popular choice for characterising galaxy size. However, the effective radius measures the concentration of light within galaxies and thus does not capture the intuitive definition of size which is related to the edge or boundary of objects. For this reason, we aim to demonstrate the undesirable consequence of using the effective radius to draw conclusions about the nature of faint 'ultra-diffuse galaxies' (UDGs) when compared to dwarfs and Milky Way-like galaxies. Instead of the effective radius, we use a measure of galaxy size based on the location of the gas density threshold required for star formation. Compared to the effective radius, this physically motivated definition places the sizes much closer to the boundary of a galaxy. Therefore, considering the sizes and stellar mass density profiles of UDGs and regular dwarfs, we find that the UDGs have sizes that are within the size range of dwarfs. We also show that currently known UDGs do not have sizes comparable to Milky Way-like objects. We find that, on average, UDGs are ten times smaller in extension than Milky Way-like galaxies. These results show that the use of size estimators sensitive to the concentration of light can lead to misleading results.