Normalized to: Chacon, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.07694 [pdf] - 2025421
HD 213885b: A transiting 1-day-period super-Earth with an Earth-like
composition around a bright ($V=7.9$) star unveiled by TESS
Espinoza, Néstor;
Brahm, Rafael;
Henning, Thomas;
Jordán, Andrés;
Dorn, Caroline;
Rojas, Felipe;
Sarkis, Paula;
Kossakowski, Diana;
Schlecker, Martin;
Díaz, Matías;
Jenkins, James S.;
Aguilera-Gomez, Claudia;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Collins, Karen A.;
Lissauer, Jack;
Armstrong, David J.;
Adibekyan, Vardan;
Barrado, David;
Barros, Susana C. C.;
Battley, Matthew;
Bayliss, Daniel;
Bouchy, François;
Bryant, Edward;
Cooke, Benjamin F.;
Demangeon, Olivier D. S.;
Dumusque, Xavier;
Figueira, Pedro;
Giles, Helen;
Lillo-Box, Jorge;
Lovis, Christophe;
Nielsen, Louise D.;
Pepe, Francesco;
Pollaco, Don;
Santos, Nuno C.;
Sousa, Sergio G.;
Udry, Stéphane;
Wheatley, Peter J.;
Turner, Oliver;
Marmier, Maxime;
Ségransan, Damien;
Ricker, George;
Latham, David;
Seager, Sara;
Winn, Joshua N.;
Kielkopf, John F.;
Hart, Rhodes;
Wingham, Geof;
Jensen, Eric L. N.;
Hełminiak, Krzysztof G.;
Tokovinin, A.;
Briceño, C.;
Ziegler, Carl;
Law, Nicholas M.;
Mann, Andrew W.;
Daylan, Tansu;
Doty, John P.;
Guerrero, Natalia;
Boyd, Patricia;
Crossfield, Ian;
Morris, Robert L.;
Henze, Christopher E.;
Chacon, Aaron Dean
Submitted: 2019-03-18, last modified: 2019-11-04
We report the discovery of the 1.008-day, ultra-short period (USP)
super-Earth HD 213885b (TOI-141b) orbiting the bright ($V=7.9$) star HD 213885
(TOI-141, TIC 403224672), detected using photometry from the recently launched
TESS mission. Using FEROS, HARPS and CORALIE radial-velocities, we measure a
precise mass of $8.8\pm0.6$ $M_\oplus$ for this $1.74 \pm 0.05$ $R_\oplus$
exoplanet, which provides enough information to constrain its bulk composition,
which is similar to Earth's but enriched in iron. The radius, mass and stellar
irradiation of HD 213885b are, given our data, very similar to 55 Cancri e,
making this exoplanet a good target to perform comparative exoplanetology of
short period, highly irradiated super-Earths. Our precise radial-velocities
reveal an additional $4.78$-day signal which we interpret as arising from a
second, non-transiting planet in the system, HD 213885c (TOI-141c), whose
minimum mass of $19.95\pm 1.4$ $M_\oplus$ makes it consistent with being a
Neptune-mass exoplanet. The HD 213885 system is very interesting from the
perspective of future atmospheric characterization, being the second brightest
star to host an ultra-short period transiting super-Earth (with the brightest
star being, in fact, 55 Cancri). Prospects for characterization with present
and future observatories are discussed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.13767 [pdf] - 1988722
Nowcasting the turbulence at the Paranal Observatory
Milli, J.;
Gonzalez, R.;
Fluxa, P. R.;
Chacon, A.;
Navarette, J.;
Sarazin, M.;
Pena, E.;
Carrasco-Davis, R.;
Solarz, A.;
Smoker, J.;
Martayan, C.;
Melo, C.;
Sedaghati, E.;
Mieske, S.;
Hainaut, O.;
Tacconi-Garman, L.
Submitted: 2019-10-30
At Paranal Observatory, the least predictable parameter affecting the
short-term scheduling of astronomical observations is the optical turbulence,
especially the seeing, coherence time and ground layer fraction. These are
critical variables driving the performance of the instruments of the Very Large
Telescope (VLT), especially those fed with adaptive optics systems. Currently,
the night astronomer does not have a predictive tool to support him/her in
decision-making at night. As most service-mode observations at the VLT last
less than two hours, it is critical to be able to predict what will happen in
this time frame, to avoid time losses due to sudden changes in the turbulence
conditions, and also to enable more aggressive scheduling. We therefore
investigate here the possibility to forecast the turbulence conditions over the
next two hours. We call this "turbulence nowcasting", analogously with weather
nowcasting, a term already used in meteorology coming from the contraction of
"now" and "forecasting". We present here the results of a study based on
historical data of the Paranal Astronomical Site Monitoring combined with
ancillary data, in a machine learning framework. We show the strengths and
shortcomings of such an approach, and present some perspectives in the context
of the Extremely Large Telescope.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.09406 [pdf] - 1806320
HATS-71b: A giant planet transiting an M3 dwarf star in TESS Sector 1
Bakos, G. Á.;
Bayliss, D.;
Bento, J.;
Bhatti, W.;
Brahm, R.;
Csubry, Z.;
Espinoza, N.;
Hartman, J. D.;
Henning, Th.;
Jordán, A.;
Mancini, L.;
Penev, K.;
Rabus, M.;
Sarkis, P.;
Suc, V.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Zhou, G.;
Butler, R. P.;
Crane, J.;
Durkan, S.;
Shectman, S.;
Kim, J.;
Lázár, J.;
Papp, I.;
Sári, P.;
Ricker, G.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Latham, D. W.;
Seager, S.;
Winn, J. N.;
Jenkins, J.;
Chacon, A. D.;
Fűrész, G.;
Goeke, B.;
Li, J.;
Quinn, S.;
Quintana, E. V.;
Tenenbaum, P.;
Teske, J.;
Vezie, M.;
Yu, L.;
Stockdale, C.;
Evans, P.;
Relles, H. M.
Submitted: 2018-12-21
We report the discovery of HATS-71b, a transiting gas giant planet on a P =
3.7955 day orbit around a G = 15.35 mag M3 dwarf star. HATS-71 is the coolest M
dwarf star known to host a hot Jupiter. The loss of light during transits is
4.7%, more than any other confirmed transiting planet system. The planet was
identified as a candidate by the ground-based HATSouth transit survey. It was
confirmed using ground-based photometry, spectroscopy, and imaging, as well as
space-based photometry from the NASA TESS mission (TIC 234523599). Combining
all of these data, and utilizing Gaia DR2, we find that the planet has a radius
of $1.080 \pm 0.016 R_J$ and mass of $0.45 \pm 0.24 M_J$ (95% confidence upper
limit of $0.81 M_J$ ), while the star has a mass of $0.569
\pm^{0.042}_{0.069}\,M_\odot$ and a radius of
$0.5161\pm^{0.0053}_{0.0099}\,R_\odot$. The Gaia DR2 data show that HATS-71
lies near the binary main sequence in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram,
suggesting that there may be an unresolved stellar binary companion. All of the
available data is well fitted by a model in which there is a secondary star of
mass $0.24 M_\odot$, although we caution that at present there is no direct
spectroscopic or imaging evidence for such a companion. Even if there does
exist such a stellar companion, the radius and mass of the planet would be only
marginally different from the values we have calculated under the assumption
that the star is single.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3820 [pdf] - 1084919
Comparing radial velocities of atmospheric lines with radiosonde
measurements
Submitted: 2011-10-17
The precision of radial velocity (RV) measurements depends on the precision
attained on the wavelength calibration. One of the available options is using
atmospheric lines as a natural, freely available wavelength reference. Figueira
et al. (2010) measured the RV of O2 lines using HARPS and showed that the
scatter was only of ~10 m/s over a timescale of 6 yr. Using a simple but
physically motivated empirical model, they demonstrated a precision of 2 m/s,
roughly twice the average photon noise contribution. In this paper we take
advantage of a unique opportunity to confirm the sensitivity of the telluric
absorption lines RV to different atmospheric and observing conditions: by means
of contemporaneous in-situ wind measurements by radiosondes.
The RV model fitting yielded similar results to that of Figueira et al.
(2010), with lower wind magnitude values and varied wind direction. The probes
confirmed the average low wind magnitude and suggested that the average wind
direction is a function of time as well. The two approaches deliver the same
results in what concerns wind magnitude and agree on wind direction when
fitting is done in segments of a couple of hours. Statistical tests show that
the model provides a good description of the data on all timescales, being
always preferable to not fitting any atmospheric variation. The smaller the
timescale on which the fitting can be performed (down to a couple of hours),
the better the description of the real physical parameters. We conclude then
that the two methods deliver compatible results, down to better than 5 m/s and
less than twice the estimated photon noise contribution on O2 lines RV
measurement. However, we cannot rule out that parameters alpha and gamma
(dependence on airmass and zero-point, respectively) have a dependence on time
or exhibit some cross-talk with other parameters (abridged).