Normalized to: Cervantes, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.03617 [pdf] - 1644121
Intrinsic backgrounds from Rn and Kr in the XENON100 experiment
XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kazama, S.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Morå, K.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Pizzella, V.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
García, D. Ramírez;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vargas, M.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, Z.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-11, last modified: 2018-03-03
In this paper, we describe the XENON100 data analyses used to assess the
target-intrinsic background sources radon ($^{222}$Rn), thoron ($^{220}$Rn) and
krypton ($^{85}$Kr). We detail the event selections of high-energy alpha
particles and decay-specific delayed coincidences. We derive distributions of
the individual radionuclides inside the detector and quantify their abundances
during the main three science runs of the experiment over a period of $\sim$ 4
years, from January 2010 to January 2014. We compare our results to external
measurements of radon emanation and krypton concentrations where we find good
agreement. We report an observed reduction in concentrations of radon daughters
that we attribute to the plating-out of charged ions on the negatively biased
cathode.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.10149 [pdf] - 1690301
Signal Yields of keV Electronic Recoils and Their Discrimination from
Nuclear Recoils in Liquid Xenon
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grandi, L.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kazama, S.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Morå, K.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
García, D. Ramírez;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rupp, N.;
Saldanha, R.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Shockley, E.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vargas, M.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, Z.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-09-28, last modified: 2018-02-01
We report on the response of liquid xenon to low energy electronic recoils
below 15 keV from beta decays of tritium at drift fields of 92 V/cm, 154 V/cm
and 366 V/cm using the XENON100 detector. A data-to-simulation fitting method
based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo is used to extract the photon yields and
recombination fluctuations from the experimental data. The photon yields
measured at the two lower fields are in agreement with those from literature;
additional measurements at a higher field of 366 V/cm are presented. The
electronic and nuclear recoil discrimination as well as its dependence on the
drift field and photon detection efficiency are investigated at these low
energies. The results provide new measurements in the energy region of interest
for dark matter searches using liquid xenon.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.06655 [pdf] - 1583594
First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Gardner, R.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grandi, L.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Howlett, J.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kazama, S.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Mariş, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Morå, K.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Riedel, B.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Saldanha, R.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Shockley, E.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thapa, S.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vargas, M.;
Upole, N.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, Z.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhu, T.
Submitted: 2017-05-18, last modified: 2017-11-23
We report the first dark matter search results from XENON1T, a
$\sim$2000-kg-target-mass dual-phase (liquid-gas) xenon time projection chamber
in operation at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso in Italy and the first
ton-scale detector of this kind. The blinded search used 34.2 live days of data
acquired between November 2016 and January 2017. Inside the (1042$\pm$12) kg
fiducial mass and in the [5, 40] $\mathrm{keV}_{\mathrm{nr}}$ energy range of
interest for WIMP dark matter searches, the electronic recoil background was
$(1.93 \pm 0.25) \times 10^{-4}$ events/(kg $\times$ day $\times
\mathrm{keV}_{\mathrm{ee}}$), the lowest ever achieved in a dark matter
detector. A profile likelihood analysis shows that the data is consistent with
the background-only hypothesis. We derive the most stringent exclusion limits
on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon interaction cross section for WIMP masses
above 10 GeV/c${}^2$, with a minimum of 7.7 $\times 10^{-47}$ cm${}^2$ for
35-GeV/c${}^2$ WIMPs at 90% confidence level.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.05804 [pdf] - 1582670
Search for magnetic inelastic dark matter with XENON100
XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vargas, M.;
Wang, H.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhanga, Y.
Submitted: 2017-04-19, last modified: 2017-10-31
We present the first search for dark matter-induced delayed coincidence
signals in a dual-phase xenon time projection chamber, using the 224.6 live
days of the XENON100 science run II. This very distinct signature is predicted
in the framework of magnetic inelastic dark matter which has been proposed to
reconcile the modulation signal reported by the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration with
the null results from other direct detection experiments. No candidate event
has been found in the region of interest and upper limits on the WIMP's
magnetic dipole moment are derived. The scenarios proposed to explain the
DAMA/LIBRA modulation signal by magnetic inelastic dark matter interactions of
WIMPs with masses of 58.0 GeV/c$^2$ and 122.7 GeV/c$^2$ are excluded at 3.3
$\sigma$ and 9.3 $\sigma$, respectively.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.07051 [pdf] - 1697916
The XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment
XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Antunes, B.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balata, M.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breskin, A.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Chiarini, A.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Corrieri, R.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Disdier, J. -M.;
Doets, M.;
Duchovni, E.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Florin, D.;
Front, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Giboni, K. -L.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grandi, L.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Huhmann, C.;
Itay, R.;
James, A.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kazama, S.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Maier, R.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Morå, K.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orlandi, D.;
Othegraven, R.;
Pakarha, P.;
Parlati, S.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
García, D. Ramírez;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Saldahna, R.;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Shockley, E.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stern, M.;
Stein, A.;
Tatananni, D.;
Tatananni, L.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Upole, N.;
Vargas, M.;
Wack, O.;
Walet, R.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, Z.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wittweg, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-23
The XENON1T experiment at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) is
the first WIMP dark matter detector operating with a liquid xenon target mass
above the ton-scale. Out of its 3.2t liquid xenon inventory, 2.0t constitute
the active target of the dual-phase time projection chamber. The scintillation
and ionization signals from particle interactions are detected with
low-background photomultipliers. This article describes the XENON1T instrument
and its subsystems as well as strategies to achieve an unprecedented low
background level. First results on the detector response and the performance of
the subsystems are also presented.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.02614 [pdf] - 1583194
Effective field theory search for high-energy nuclear recoils using the
XENON100 dark matter detector
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kazama, S.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Mora, K.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vargas, M.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, Z.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Farmer, B.
Submitted: 2017-05-07
We report on WIMP search results in the XENON100 detector using a
non-relativistic effective field theory approach. The data from science run II
(34 kg $\times$ 224.6 live days) was re-analyzed, with an increased recoil
energy interval compared to previous analyses, ranging from $(6.6 -
240)~\mathrm{keV_\mathrm{nr}}$. The data is found to be compatible with the
background-only hypothesis. We present 90% confidence level exclusion limits on
the coupling constants of WIMP-nucleon effective operators using a binned
profile likelihood method. We also consider the case of inelastic WIMP
scattering, where incident WIMPs may up-scatter to a higher mass state, and set
exclusion limits on this model as well.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.05830 [pdf] - 1943215
Search for WIMP Inelastic Scattering off Xenon Nuclei with XENON100
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kazama, S.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lombardi, F.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Molinario, A.;
Mora, K.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vargas, M.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, Z.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
We present the first constraints on the spin-dependent, inelastic scattering
cross section of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) on nucleons from
XENON100 data with an exposure of 7.64$\times$10$^3$\,kg\,day. XENON100 is a
dual-phase xenon time projection chamber with 62\,kg of active mass, operated
at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy and designed to
search for nuclear recoils from WIMP-nucleus interactions. Here we explore
inelastic scattering, where a transition to a low-lying excited nuclear state
of $^{129}$Xe is induced. The experimental signature is a nuclear recoil
observed together with the prompt de-excitation photon. We see no evidence for
such inelastic WIMP-$^{129}$Xe interactions. A profile likelihood analysis
allows us to set a 90\% C.L. upper limit on the inelastic, spin-dependent
WIMP-nucleon cross section of $3.3 \times 10^{-38}$\,cm$^{2}$ at
100\,GeV/c$^2$. This is the most constraining result to date, and sets the
pathway for an analysis of this interaction channel in upcoming, larger
dual-phase xenon detectors.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.06154 [pdf] - 1531664
XENON100 Dark Matter Results from a Combination of 477 Live Days
XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Calvén, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-09-20, last modified: 2017-01-12
We report on WIMP search results of the XENON100 experiment, combining three
runs summing up to 477 live days from January 2010 to January 2014. Data from
the first two runs were already published. A blind analysis was applied to the
last run recorded between April 2013 and January 2014 prior to combining the
results. The ultra-low electromagnetic background of the experiment, ~$5 \times
10^{-3}$ events/(keV$_{\mathrm{ee}}\times$kg$\times$day) before electronic
recoil rejection, together with the increased exposure of 48 kg $\times$ yr
improves the sensitivity. A profile likelihood analysis using an energy range
of (6.6 - 43.3) keV$_{\mathrm{nr}}$ sets a limit on the elastic,
spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section for WIMP masses above 8
GeV/$c^2$, with a minimum of 1.1 $\times 10^{-45}$ cm$^2$ at 50 GeV/$c^2$ and
90% confidence level. We also report updated constraints on the elastic,
spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections obtained with the same data. We set
upper limits on the WIMP-neutron (proton) cross section with a minimum of 2.0
$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^2$ (52$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^2$) at a WIMP mass of 50
GeV/$c^2$, at 90% confidence level.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.00769 [pdf] - 1542876
Search for Electronic Recoil Event Rate Modulation with 4 Years of
XENON100 Data
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Butikofer, L.;
Calven, J.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Diglio, S.;
Eurin, G.;
Fei, J.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Rosso, A. Gallo;
Galloway, M.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Lin, Q.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Manfredini, A.;
Maris, I.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Pizzella, V.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Silva, M.;
Simgen, H.;
Sivers, M. v.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wang, H.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Ye, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-01-03
We report on a search for electronic recoil event rate modulation signatures
in the XENON100 data accumulated over a period of 4 years, from January 2010 to
January 2014. A profile likelihood method, which incorporates the stability of
the XENON100 detector and the known electronic recoil background model, is used
to quantify the significance of periodicity in the time distribution of events.
There is a weak modulation signature at a period of $431^{+16}_{-14}$ days in
the low energy region of $(2.0-5.8)$ keV in the single scatter event sample,
with a global significance of $1.9\,\sigma$, however no other more significant
modulation is observed. The expected annual modulation of a dark matter signal
is not compatible with this result. Single scatter events in the low energy
region are thus used to exclude the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation as being due
to dark matter electron interactions via axial vector coupling at
$5.7\,\sigma$.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.06262 [pdf] - 1530726
A low-mass dark matter search using ionization signals in XENON100
XENON100 Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arneodo, F.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Benabderrahmane, M. L.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Bruenner, E. Brown S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buss, A.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hasterok, C.;
Hogenbirk, E.;
Itay, R.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Linde, F.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Masson, D.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C. D.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-05-20, last modified: 2016-12-19
We perform a low-mass dark matter search using an exposure of
30\,kg$\times$yr with the XENON100 detector. By dropping the requirement of a
scintillation signal and using only the ionization signal to determine the
interaction energy, we lowered the energy threshold for detection to 0.7\,keV
for nuclear recoils. No dark matter detection can be claimed because a complete
background model cannot be constructed without a primary scintillation signal.
Instead, we compute an upper limit on the WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section
under the assumption that every event passing our selection criteria could be a
signal event. Using an energy interval from 0.7\,keV to 9.1\,keV, we derive a
limit on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section that excludes WIMPs
with a mass of 6\,GeV/$c^2$ above $1.4 \times 10^{-41}$\,cm$^2$ at 90\%
confidence level.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.01138 [pdf] - 1413105
A Rn-220 source for the calibration of low-background experiments
Submitted: 2016-02-02, last modified: 2016-05-25
We characterize two 40 kBq sources of electrodeposited Th-228 for use in
low-background experiments. The sources efficiently emanate Rn-220, a noble gas
that can diffuse in a detector volume. Rn-220 and its daughter isotopes produce
alpha, beta, and gamma-radiation, which may used to calibrate a variety of
detector responses and features, before decaying completely in only a few days.
We perform various tests to place limits on the release of other long-lived
isotopes. In particular, we find an emanation of <0.008 atoms/min/kBq (90% CL)
for Th-228 and 1.53 atoms/min/kBq for Ra-224. The sources lend themselves in
particular to the calibration of detectors employing liquid noble elements such
as argon and xenon. With the source mounted in a noble gas system, we
demonstrate that filters are highly efficient in reducing the activity of these
longer-lived isotopes further. We thus confirm the suitability of these sources
even for use in next-generation experiments, such as XENON1T/XENONnT, LZ, and
nEXO.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07501 [pdf] - 1395004
Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment
The XENON collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Amaro, F. D.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Berger, T.;
Breur, P.;
Breskin, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Bütikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Cichon, D.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Gangi, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Franco, D.;
Fulgione, W.;
Galloway, M.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Greene, Z.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Manfredini, A.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodán;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pelssers, B.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Rupp, N.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Scheibelhut, M.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Stein, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
von Sivers, M.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Wei, Y.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Wulf, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-12-23, last modified: 2016-04-15
The XENON1T experiment is currently in the commissioning phase at the
Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy. In this article we study the
experiment's expected sensitivity to the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon
interaction cross section, based on Monte Carlo predictions of the electronic
and nuclear recoil backgrounds.
The total electronic recoil background in $1$ tonne fiducial volume and ($1$,
$12$) keV electronic recoil equivalent energy region, before applying any
selection to discriminate between electronic and nuclear recoils, is $(1.80 \pm
0.15) \cdot 10^{-4}$ ($\rm{kg} \cdot day \cdot keV)^{-1}$, mainly due to the
decay of $^{222}\rm{Rn}$ daughters inside the xenon target. The nuclear recoil
background in the corresponding nuclear recoil equivalent energy region ($4$,
$50$) keV, is composed of $(0.6 \pm 0.1)$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
radiogenic neutrons, $(1.8 \pm 0.3) \cdot 10^{-2}$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$ from
coherent scattering of neutrinos, and less than $0.01$ ($\rm{t} \cdot y)^{-1}$
from muon-induced neutrons.
The sensitivity of XENON1T is calculated with the Profile Likelihood Ratio
method, after converting the deposited energy of electronic and nuclear recoils
into the scintillation and ionization signals seen in the detector. We take
into account the systematic uncertainties on the photon and electron emission
model, and on the estimation of the backgrounds, treated as nuisance
parameters. The main contribution comes from the relative scintillation
efficiency $\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{eff}$, which affects both the signal from WIMPs
and the nuclear recoil backgrounds. After a $2$ y measurement in $1$ t fiducial
volume, the sensitivity reaches a minimum cross section of $1.6 \cdot 10^{-47}$
cm$^2$ at m$_\chi$=$50$ GeV/$c^2$.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07748 [pdf] - 1268647
Search for Event Rate Modulation in XENON100 Electronic Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Aalbers, J.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Anthony, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Breur, P. A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
de Perio, P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Hasterok, C.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Mayani, D.;
Meng, A. J. Melgarejo Fernandez. Y.;
Messina, M.;
Micheneau, K.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
We have searched for periodic variations of the electronic recoil event rate
in the (2-6) keV energy range recorded between February 2011 and March 2012
with the XENON100 detector, adding up to 224.6 live days in total. Following a
detailed study to establish the stability of the detector and its background
contributions during this run, we performed an un-binned profile likelihood
analysis to identify any periodicity up to 500 days. We find a global
significance of less than 1 sigma for all periods suggesting no statistically
significant modulation in the data. While the local significance for an annual
modulation is 2.8 sigma, the analysis of a multiple-scatter control sample and
the phase of the modulation disfavor a dark matter interpretation. The
DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation interpreted as a dark matter signature with
axial-vector coupling of WIMPs to electrons is excluded at 4.8 sigma.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07747 [pdf] - 1264865
Exclusion of Leptophilic Dark Matter Models using XENON100 Electronic
Recoil Data
The XENON Collaboration;
Aprile, E.;
Agostini, F.;
Alfonsi, M.;
Arazi, L.;
Arisaka, K.;
Arneodo, F.;
Auger, M.;
Balan, C.;
Barrow, P.;
Baudis, L.;
Bauermeister, B.;
Behrens, A.;
Brown, A.;
Brown, E.;
Bruenner, S.;
Bruno, G.;
Budnik, R.;
Buetikofer, L.;
Cardoso, J. M. R.;
Cervantes, M.;
Coderre, D.;
Colijn, A. P.;
Contreras, H.;
Cussonneau, J. P.;
Decowski, M. P.;
Di Giovanni, A.;
Duchovni, E.;
Fattori, S.;
Ferella, A. D.;
Fieguth, A.;
Fulgione, W.;
Gao, F.;
Garbini, M.;
Geis, C.;
Goetzke, L. W.;
Grignon, C.;
Gross, E.;
Hampel, W.;
Itay, R.;
Kaether, F.;
Kaminsky, B.;
Kessler, G.;
Kish, A.;
Landsman, H.;
Lang, R. F.;
Calloch, M. Le;
Lellouch, D.;
Levinson, L.;
Levy, C.;
Lindemann, S.;
Lindner, M.;
Lopes, J. A. M.;
Lyashenko, A.;
Macmullin, S.;
Undagoitia, T. Marrodan;
Masbou, J.;
Massoli, F. V.;
Paras, D. Mayani;
Fernandez, A. J. Melgarejo;
Meng, Y.;
Messina, M.;
Miguez, B.;
Molinario, A.;
Morana, G.;
Murra, M.;
Naganoma, J.;
Ni, K.;
Oberlack, U.;
Orrigo, S. E. A.;
Pakarha, P.;
Pantic, E.;
Persiani, R.;
Piastra, F.;
Pienaar, J.;
Plante, G.;
Priel, N.;
Rauch, L.;
Reichard, S.;
Reuter, C.;
Rizzo, A.;
Rosendahl, S.;
Santos, J. M. F. dos;
Sartorelli, G.;
Schindler, S.;
Schreiner, J.;
Schumann, M.;
Lavina, L. Scotto;
Selvi, M.;
Shagin, P.;
Simgen, H.;
Teymourian, A.;
Thers, D.;
Tiseni, A.;
Trinchero, G.;
Tunnell, C.;
Vitells, O.;
Wall, R.;
Wang, H.;
Weber, M.;
Weinheimer, C.
Submitted: 2015-07-28
Laboratory experiments searching for galactic dark matter particles
scattering off nuclei have so far not been able to establish a discovery. We
use data from the XENON100 experiment to search for dark matter interacting
with electrons. With no evidence for a signal above the low background of our
experiment, we exclude a variety of representative dark matter models that
would induce electronic recoils. For axial-vector couplings to electrons, we
exclude cross-sections above 6x10^(-35) cm^2 for particle masses of m_chi = 2
GeV/c^2. Independent of the dark matter halo, we exclude leptophilic models as
explanation for the long-standing DAMA/LIBRA signal, such as couplings to
electrons through axial-vector interactions at a 4.4 sigma confidence level,
mirror dark matter at 3.6 sigma, and luminous dark matter at 4.6 sigma.