Normalized to: Cervantes, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.01721 [pdf] - 2093277
A joint SZ-Xray-optical analysis of the dynamical state of 288 massive
galaxy clusters
Zenteno, A.;
Hernández-Lang, D.;
Klein, M.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Bhargava, S.;
Palmese, A.;
Strazzullo, V.;
Romer, A. K.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Saro, A.;
Lidman, C.;
Gruen, D.;
Ojeda, V.;
Katzenberger, A.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bayliss, M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Floyd, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gonzalez, J. R.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McDonald, M.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Varga, T. N.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-04-03, last modified: 2020-04-28
We use imaging from the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey to
characterize the dynamical state of 288 galaxy clusters at $0.1 \lesssim z
\lesssim 0.9$ detected in the South Pole Telescope (SPT) Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ)
effect survey (SPT-SZ). We examine spatial offsets between the position of the
brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) and the center of the gas distribution as traced
by the SPT-SZ centroid and by the X-ray centroid/peak position from Chandra and
XMM data. We show that the radial distribution of offsets provides no evidence
that SPT SZ-selected cluster samples include a higher fraction of mergers than
X-ray-selected cluster samples. We use the offsets to classify the dynamical
state of the clusters, selecting the 43 most disturbed clusters, with half of
those at $z \gtrsim 0.5$, a region seldom explored previously. We find that
Schechter function fits to the galaxy population in disturbed clusters and
relaxed clusters differ at $z>0.55$ but not at lower redshifts. Disturbed
clusters at $z>0.55$ have steeper faint-end slopes and brighter characteristic
magnitudes. Within the same redshift range, we find that the BCGs in relaxed
clusters tend to be brighter than the BCGs in disturbed samples, while in
agreement in the lower redshift bin. Possible explanations includes a higher
merger rate, and a more efficient dynamical friction at high redshift. The
red-sequence population is less affected by the cluster dynamical state than
the general galaxy population.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08813 [pdf] - 2057676
Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark
Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters
Palmese, A.;
Annis, J.;
Burgad, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Welch, B.;
Pereira, M. da Silva;
Lin, H.;
Bhargava, S.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Giles, P.;
Jeltema, T.;
Romer, A. K.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Hilton, M.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Bermeo, A.;
Mayers, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
McClintock, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Collins, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Liddle, A.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Sahlen, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stott, J.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2019-03-20, last modified: 2019-11-18
We introduce a galaxy cluster mass observable, $\mu_\star$, based on the
stellar masses of cluster members, and we present results for the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Year 1 observations. Stellar masses are computed using a Bayesian
Model Averaging method, and are validated for DES data using simulations and
COSMOS data. We show that $\mu_\star$ works as a promising mass proxy by
comparing our predictions to X-ray measurements. We measure the X-ray
temperature-$\mu_\star$ relation for a total of 150 clusters matched between
the wide-field DES Year 1 redMaPPer catalogue, and Chandra and XMM archival
observations, spanning the redshift range $0.1<z<0.7$. For a scaling relation
which is linear in logarithmic space, we find a slope of $\alpha =
0.488\pm0.043$ and a scatter in the X-ray temperature at fixed $\mu_\star$ of
$\sigma_{{\rm ln} T_X|\mu_\star}=0.266^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$ for the joint sample.
By using the halo mass scaling relations of the X-ray temperature from the
Weighing the Giants program, we further derive the $\mu_\star$-conditioned
scatter in mass, finding $\sigma_{{\rm ln} M|\mu_\star}=0.26^{+ 0.15}_{-
0.10}$. These results are competitive with well-established cluster mass
proxies used for cosmological analyses, showing that $\mu_\star$ can be used as
a reliable and physically motivated mass proxy to derive cosmological
constraints.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05908 [pdf] - 1908558
Galaxies in X-ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey
Data II: Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of the Red-Sequence Galaxy Luminosity
Function
Zhang, Y.;
Miller, C. J.;
Rooney, P.;
Bermeo, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
cervantes, C. Vergara;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Hennig, C.;
Das, R.;
Mckay, T.;
Song, J.;
Wilcox, H.;
Bacon, D.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Collins, C.;
Conselice, C.;
Hilton, M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Kay, S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mehrtens, N.;
Mayers, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-levy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
rosell, A. Carnero;
kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Dandrea, C. B.;
Da costa, L. N.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Garcia-bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-10-16, last modified: 2019-06-29
Using $\sim 100$ X-ray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red
sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous
optical/X-ray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity
function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass ($13.5 \le
\rm{log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim< 15.0$). We pay particular attention to
completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply
a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schecter
function, including its characteristic break ($m^*$) to a faint end power-law
slope ($\alpha$). Our method enables us to avoid known issues in similar
analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and
statistically insignificant ($\sim 1.9 \sigma$) evolution in the faint end
slope $\alpha$ versus redshift. We also find no dependence in $\alpha$ or $m^*$
with the X-ray inferred cluster masses. However, the amplitude of the LF as a
function of cluster mass is constrained to $\sim 20\%$ precision. As a
by-product of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and
cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses
as well as the scatter in true mass given the X-ray inferred masses. This
technique can be applied to a larger sample of X-ray or optically selected
clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, significantly improving the sensitivity
of the analysis.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.07119 [pdf] - 1893322
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of Cluster Mis-centering
in the redMaPPer Catalogs
Zhang, Y.;
Jeltema, T.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Everett, S.;
Rozo, E.;
Farahi, A.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Giles, P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Mantz, A.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Stern, C.;
Gruen, D.;
von der Linden, A.;
Splettstoesser, M.;
Chen, X.;
Costanzi, M.;
Allen, S.;
Collins, C.;
Hilton, M.;
Klein, M.;
Mann, R. G.;
Manolopoulou, M.;
Morris, G.;
Mayers, J.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2019-01-21, last modified: 2019-06-01
The center determination of a galaxy cluster from an optical cluster finding
algorithm can be offset from theoretical prescriptions or $N$-body definitions
of its host halo center. These offsets impact the recovered cluster statistics,
affecting both richness measurements and the weak lensing shear profile around
the clusters. This paper models the centering performance of the \RM~cluster
finding algorithm using archival X-ray observations of \RM-selected clusters.
Assuming the X-ray emission peaks as the fiducial halo centers, and through
analyzing their offsets to the \RM~centers, we find that $\sim 75\pm 8 \%$ of
the \RM~clusters are well centered and the mis-centered offset follows a Gamma
distribution in normalized, projected distance. These mis-centering offsets
cause a systematic underestimation of cluster richness relative to the
well-centered clusters, for which we propose a descriptive model. Our results
enable the DES Y1 cluster cosmology analysis by characterizing the necessary
corrections to both the weak lensing and richness abundance functions of the
DES Y1 redMaPPer cluster catalog.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08042 [pdf] - 1971206
Mass Variance from Archival X-ray Properties of Dark Energy Survey
Year-1 Galaxy Clusters
Farahi, A.;
Chen, X.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Bhargava, S.;
Giles, P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Jeltema, T.;
Hilton, M.;
Bermeo, A.;
Mayers, J.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Collins, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantz, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Zhang, Y.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-03-19
Using archival X-ray observations and a log-normal population model, we
estimate constraints on the intrinsic scatter in halo mass at fixed optical
richness for a galaxy cluster sample identified in Dark Energy Survey Year-One
(DES-Y1) data with the redMaPPer algorithm. We examine the scaling behavior of
X-ray temperatures, $T_X$, with optical richness, $\lambda_{RM}$, for clusters
in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.7$. X-ray temperatures are obtained from Chandra
and XMM observations for 58 and 110 redMaPPer systems, respectively. Despite
non-uniform sky coverage, the $T_X$ measurements are $> 50\%$ complete for
clusters with $\lambda_{RM} > 130$. Regression analysis on the two samples
produces consistent posterior scaling parameters, from which we derive a
combined constraint on the residual scatter, $\sigma_{\ln Tx | \lambda} = 0.275
\pm 0.019$. Joined with constraints for $T_X$ scaling with halo mass from the
Weighing the Giants program and richness--temperature covariance estimates from
the LoCuSS sample, we derive the richness-conditioned scatter in mass,
$\sigma_{\ln M | \lambda} = 0.30 \pm 0.04\, _{({\rm stat})} \pm 0.09\, _{({\rm
sys})}$, at an optical richness of approximately 70. Uncertainties in external
parameters, particularly the slope and variance of the $T_X$--mass relation and
the covariance of $T_X$ and $\lambda_{RM}$ at fixed mass, dominate the
systematic error. The $95\%$ confidence region from joint sample analysis is
relatively broad, $\sigma_{\ln M | \lambda} \in [0.14, \, 0.55]$, or a factor
ten in variance.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00039 [pdf] - 1767415
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of
redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shin, T.;
Melchior, P.;
DeRose, J.;
Seitz, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
von der Linden, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mantz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Allen, S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Farahi, A.;
Hamaus, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Israel, H.;
Li, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Morris, G.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pollina, G.;
Rau, M. M.;
Simet, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-30, last modified: 2018-09-12
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00621 [pdf] - 1413096
The redMaPPer Galaxy Cluster Catalog From DES Science Verification Data
Rykoff, E. S.;
Rozo, E.;
Hollowood, D.;
Bermeo-Hernandez, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mayers, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rooney, P.;
Saro, A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Wilcox, H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Childress, M.;
Collins, C. A.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hilton, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kay, S. T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Sahlén, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stott, J. P.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D.;
Uddin, s.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-01-04, last modified: 2016-05-25
We describe updates to the \redmapper{} algorithm, a photometric red-sequence
cluster finder specifically designed for large photometric surveys. The updated
algorithm is applied to $150\,\mathrm{deg}^2$ of Science Verification (SV) data
from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)
DR8 photometric data set. The DES SV catalog is locally volume limited, and
contains 786 clusters with richness $\lambda>20$ (roughly equivalent to
$M_{\rm{500c}}\gtrsim10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}\,M_{\odot}$) and $0.2<z<0.9$. The DR8
catalog consists of 26311 clusters with $0.08<z<0.6$, with a sharply increasing
richness threshold as a function of redshift for $z\gtrsim 0.35$. The
photometric redshift performance of both catalogs is shown to be excellent,
with photometric redshift uncertainties controlled at the $\sigma_z/(1+z)\sim
0.01$ level for $z\lesssim0.7$, rising to $\sim0.02$ at $z\sim0.9$ in DES SV.
We make use of \emph{Chandra} and \emph{XMM} X-ray and South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zeldovich data to show that the centering performance and
mass--richness scatter are consistent with expectations based on prior runs of
\redmapper{} on SDSS data. We also show how the \redmapper{} \photoz{} and
richness estimates are relatively insensitive to imperfect star/galaxy
separation and small-scale star masks.