Normalized to: Cecchi, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.11842 [pdf] - 1925121
Quiescent galaxies at $z \gtrsim 2.5$: observations vs. models
Submitted: 2019-06-27
The presence of massive quiescent galaxies at high redshifts is still a
challenge for most models of galaxy formation. The aim of this work is to
compare the observed number density and properties of these galaxies with the
predictions of state-of-the-art models. The sample of massive quiescent
galaxies has been selected from the COSMOS2015 photometric catalogue with
$z_{\rm phot}\geq 2.5$, $\log (M_*/M_\odot)\geq 10.5$ and
$\log(\mathrm{sSFR\,[yr^{-1}]})\le -11$. The photometric SEDs of the selected
galaxies have been thoroughly analyzed based on different stellar population
synthesis models. The final sample includes only those galaxies qualified as
quiescent in all SED fitting runs. The observed properties have been compared
to theoretical models: the number density of quiescent galaxies with $10.5 \leq
\log(M_*/M_\odot) < 10.8$ is reproduced by some models, although there is a
large scatter in their predictions. Instead, very massive
$\log(M_{*}/M_{\odot}) \geq 10.8$ are underpredicted by most of the current
models of galaxy formation: some of them, built on the CARNage simulation, are
consistent with data up to $z \sim 4$, while at higher redshifts the volume of
the considered simulation is too small to find such rare objects. Simulated
galaxies which match the observed properties in the $\mathrm{sSFR}-M_*$ plane
at $z\sim 3$ have been analyzed by reconstructing their evolutionary paths:
their merger trees suggest that AGN feedback could be the key process allowing
for a rapid quenching of the star formation at $z\gtrsim 4$ and that its
treatment should be improved in models.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.6073 [pdf] - 986943
The major upgrade of the MAGIC telescopes, Part I: The hardware
improvements and the commissioning of the system
MAGIC Collaboration;
Aleksic, J.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Antoranz, P.;
Babic, A.;
Bangale, P.;
Barcelo, M.;
Barrio, J. A.;
Gonzalez, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bernardini, E.;
Biasuzzi, B.;
Biland, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Borracci, F.;
Bretz, T.;
Carmona, E.;
Carosi, A.;
Cecchi, R.;
Colin, P.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Corti, D.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Caneva, G.;
De Lotto, B.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Mendez, C. Delgado;
Dettlaff, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Einecke, S.;
Eisenacher, D.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Fink, D.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Frantzen, K.;
Fruck, C.;
Galindo, D.;
Lopez, R. J. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Terrats, D. Garrido;
Gaug, M.;
Giavitto, G.;
Godinovic, N.;
Munoz, A. Gonzalez;
Gozzini, S. R.;
Haberer, W.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Hayashida, M.;
Herrera, J.;
Hildebrand, D.;
Hose, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Idec, W.;
Illa, J. M.;
Kadenius, V.;
Kellermann, H.;
Knoetig, M. L.;
Kodani, K.;
Konno, Y.;
Krause, J.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Lemus, J. L.;
Lewandowska, N.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
Lopez, M.;
Lopez-Coto, R.;
Lopez-Oramas, A.;
Lorca, A.;
Lorenz, E.;
Lozano, I.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallot, K.;
Maneva, G.;
Mankuzhiyil, N.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Marcote, B.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martinez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Menzel, U.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Moralejo, A.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Nakajima, D.;
Negrello, M.;
Neustroev, V.;
Niedzwiecki, A.;
Nilsson, K.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Orito, R.;
Overkemping, A.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Paredes-Fortuny, X.;
Persic, M.;
Poutanen, J.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Reinthal, R.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribo, M.;
Rico, J.;
Garcia, J. Rodriguez;
Rugamer, S.;
Saito, T.;
Saito, K.;
Satalecka, K.;
Scalzotto, V.;
Scapin, V.;
Schultz, C.;
Schlammer, J.;
Schmidl, S.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sillanpaa, A.;
Sitarek, J.;
Snidaric, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Spanier, F.;
Stamerra, A.;
Steinbring, T.;
Storz, J.;
Strzys, M.;
Takalo, L.;
Takami, H.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzic, T.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Thaele, J.;
Tibolla, O.;
Torres, D. F.;
Toyama, T.;
Treves, A.;
Vogler, P.;
Wetteskind, H.;
Will, M.;
Zanin, R.
Submitted: 2014-09-21, last modified: 2015-04-30
The MAGIC telescopes are two Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs)
located on the Canary island of La Palma. The telescopes are designed to
measure Cherenkov light from air showers initiated by gamma rays in the energy
regime from around 50 GeV to more than 50 TeV. The two telescopes were built in
2004 and 2009, respectively, with different cameras, triggers and readout
systems. In the years 2011-2012 the MAGIC collaboration undertook a major
upgrade to make the stereoscopic system uniform, improving its overall
performance and easing its maintenance. In particular, the camera, the
receivers and the trigger of the first telescope were replaced and the readout
of the two telescopes was upgraded. This paper (Part I) describes the details
of the upgrade as well as the basic performance parameters of MAGIC such as raw
data treatment, dead time of the system, linearity in the electronic chain and
sources of noise. In Part II, we describe the physics performance of the
upgraded system.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.5594 [pdf] - 938161
The major upgrade of the MAGIC telescopes, Part II: A performance study
using observations of the Crab Nebula
MAGIC Collaboration;
Aleksic, J.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Antoranz, P.;
Babic, A.;
Bangale, P.;
Barcelo, M.;
Barrio, J. A.;
Gonzalez, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bernardini, E.;
Biasuzzi, B.;
Biland, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Borracci, F.;
Bretz, T.;
Carmona, E.;
Carosi, A.;
Cecchi, R.;
Colin, P.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Corti, D.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Caneva, G.;
De Lotto, B.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Mendez, C. Delgado;
Dettlaff, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Einecke, S.;
Eisenacher, D.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Fink, D.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Frantzen, K.;
Fruck, C.;
Galindo, D.;
Lopez, R. J. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Terrats, D. Garrido;
Gaug, M.;
Giavitto, G.;
Godinovic, N.;
Munoz, A. Gonzalez;
Gozzini, S. R.;
Haberer, W.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Hayashida, M.;
Herrera, J.;
Hildebrand, D.;
Hose, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Idec, W.;
Illa, J. M.;
Kadenius, V.;
Kellermann, H.;
Knoetig, M. L.;
Kodani, K.;
Konno, Y.;
Krause, J.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Lemus, J. L.;
Lewandowska, N.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
Lopez, M.;
Lopez-Coto, R.;
Lopez-Oramas, A.;
Lorca, A.;
Lorenz, E.;
Lozano, I.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallot, K.;
Maneva, G.;
Mankuzhiyil, N.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Marcote, B.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martinez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Menzel, U.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Moralejo, A.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Nakajima, D.;
Negrello, M.;
Neustroev, V.;
Niedzwiecki, A.;
Nilsson, K.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Orito, R.;
Overkemping, A.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Paredes-Fortuny, X.;
Persic, M.;
Poutanen, J.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Reinthal, R.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribo, M.;
Rico, J.;
Garcia, J. Rodriguez;
Rugamer, S.;
Saito, T.;
Saito, K.;
Satalecka, K.;
Scalzotto, V.;
Scapin, V.;
Schultz, C.;
Schlammer, J.;
Schmidl, S.;
Schweizer, T.;
Shore, S. N.;
Sillanpaa, A.;
Sitarek, J.;
Snidaric, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Spanier, F.;
Stamerra, A.;
Steinbring, T.;
Storz, J.;
Strzys, M.;
Takalo, L.;
Takami, H.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzic, T.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Thaele, J.;
Tibolla, O.;
Torres, D. F.;
Toyama, T.;
Treves, A.;
Vogler, P.;
Wetteskind, H.;
Will, M.;
Zanin, R.
Submitted: 2014-09-19, last modified: 2015-02-20
MAGIC is a system of two Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes located in
the Canary island of La Palma, Spain. During summer 2011 and 2012 it underwent
a series of upgrades, involving the exchange of the MAGIC-I camera and its
trigger system, as well as the upgrade of the readout system of both
telescopes. We use observations of the Crab Nebula taken at low and medium
zenith angles to assess the key performance parameters of the MAGIC stereo
system. For low zenith angle observations, the standard trigger threshold of
the MAGIC telescopes is ~50GeV. The integral sensitivity for point-like sources
with Crab Nebula-like spectrum above 220GeV is (0.66+/-0.03)% of Crab Nebula
flux in 50 h of observations. The angular resolution, defined as the sigma of a
2-dimensional Gaussian distribution, at those energies is < 0.07 degree, while
the energy resolution is 16%. We also re-evaluate the effect of the systematic
uncertainty on the data taken with the MAGIC telescopes after the upgrade. We
estimate that the systematic uncertainties can be divided in the following
components: < 15% in energy scale, 11-18% in flux normalization and +/-0.15 for
the energy spectrum power-law slope.