Normalized to: Cawthon, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05929 [pdf] - 2089021
Blinding multi-probe cosmological experiments
Muir, J.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Elsner, F.;
Krause, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Zuntz, J.;
Collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13, last modified: 2020-05-04
The goal of blinding is to hide an experiment's critical results -- here the
inferred cosmological parameters -- until all decisions affecting its analysis
have been finalised. This is especially important in the current era of
precision cosmology, when the results of any new experiment are closely
scrutinised for consistency or tension with previous results. In analyses that
combine multiple observational probes, like the combination of galaxy
clustering and weak lensing in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), it is challenging
to blind the results while retaining the ability to check for (in)consistency
between different parts of the data. We propose a simple new blinding
transformation that works by modifying the summary statistics that are input to
parameter estimation, such as two-point correlation functions. The
transformation shifts the measured statistics to new values that are consistent
with (blindly) shifted cosmological parameters, while preserving internal
(in)consistency. We apply the blinding transformation to simulated data for the
projected DES Year 3 galaxy clustering and weak lensing analysis, demonstrating
that practical blinding is achieved without significant perturbation of
internal-consistency checks, as measured here by degradation of the $\chi^2$
between data and best-fitting model. Our blinding method conserves $\chi^2$
more precisely as experiments evolve to higher precision.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.12218 [pdf] - 2084339
First Hubble diagram and cosmological constraints using superluminous
supernova
Inserra, C.;
Sullivan, M.;
Angus, C. R.;
Macaulay, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Frohmaier, C.;
Gutiérrez, C. P.;
Möller, A.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P. J.;
Davis, T. M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Galbany, L.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Thomas, B. P.;
Wiseman, P.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Malagón, A. A. Plazas;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.;
Asorey, J.;
Calcino, J.;
Carollo, D.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Sharp, R.;
Swann, E.;
Tucker, B. E.
Submitted: 2020-04-25
We present the first Hubble diagram of superluminous supernovae (SLSNe) out
to a redshift of two, together with constraints on the matter density,
$\Omega_{\rm M}$, and the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, $w(\equiv
p/\rho)$. We build a sample of 20 cosmologically useful SLSNe~I based on light
curve and spectroscopy quality cuts. We confirm the robustness of the peak
decline SLSN~I standardization relation with a larger dataset and improved
fitting techniques than previous works. We then solve the SLSN model based on
the above standardisation via minimisation of the $\chi^2$ computed from a
covariance matrix which includes statistical and systematic uncertainties. For
a spatially flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, we find $\Omega_{\rm
M}=0.44^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$, with a rms of 0.28 mag for the residuals of the
distance moduli. For an $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological model, the addition of SLSNe~I
to a `baseline' measurement consisting of Planck temperature and WMAP
polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) fluctuation together with
type Ia supernovae, results in a small improvement in the constraints of $w_0$
and $w_a$ of 4\%. We present simulations of future surveys with 847 SLSNe I and
show that such a sample can deliver cosmological constraints in a flat
$\Lambda$CDM model with the same precision (considering only statistical
uncertainties) as current surveys that use type Ia supernovae, while providing
an improvement of 15\% in the constraints on the time variation of dark energy,
$w_0$ and $w_a$. This paper represents the proof-of-concept for superluminous
supernova cosmology, and demonstrates they can provide an independent test of
cosmology in the high-redshift ($z>1$) universe.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.09251 [pdf] - 2070051
Effects of Redshift Uncertainty on Cross-Correlations of CMB Lensing and
Galaxy Surveys
Submitted: 2018-09-24, last modified: 2020-03-24
We explore the effects of incorporating redshift uncertainty into
measurements of galaxy clustering and cross-correlations of galaxy positions
and cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing maps. We use a simple Gaussian
model for a redshift distribution in a redshift bin with two parameters: the
mean, $z_0$, and the width, $\sigma_z$. We vary these parameters, as well as a
galaxy bias parameter, $b_{\text{g}}$, and a matter fluctuations parameter,
$\sigma_8$, for each redshift bin, as well as the parameter
$\Omega_{\text{m}}$, in a Fisher analysis across 12 redshift bins from $z=0-7$.
We find that incorporating redshift uncertainties degrades constraints on
$\sigma_8(z)$ in the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)/CMB-S4 era by about
a factor of 10 compared to the case of perfect redshift knowledge. In our
fiducial analysis of LSST/CMB-S4 including redshift uncertainties, we project
constraints on $\sigma_8(z)$ for $z<3$ of less than $5 \%$. Galaxy imaging
surveys are expected to have priors on redshift parameters from photometric
redshift algorithms and other methods. When adding priors with the expected
precision for LSST redshift algorithms, the constraints on $\sigma_8(z)$ can be
improved by a factor of 2-3 compared to the case of no prior information. We
also find that `self-calibrated' constraints on the redshift parameters from
just the autocorrelation and cross-correlation measurements (with no prior
information) are competitive with photometric redshift techniques. In the
LSST/CMB-S4 era, we find uncertainty on the redshift parameters
($z_0,\sigma_z$) to be below 0.004(1+z) at $z<1$. For all parameters,
constraints improve significantly if smaller scales can be used. We also
project constraints for nearer term survey combinations, Dark Energy Survey
(DES)/SPT-SZ, DES/SPT-3G, and LSST/SPT-3G, and analyze how our constraints
depend on a variety of parameter and model choices.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10454 [pdf] - 2129267
The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of
redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
Hartley, W. G.;
Chang, C.;
Samani, S.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Asorey, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Kuehn, K.;
King, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
DeRose, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchon, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-03-23
Obtaining accurate distributions of galaxy redshifts is a critical aspect of
weak lensing cosmology experiments. One of the methods used to estimate and
validate redshift distributions is apply weights to a spectroscopic sample so
that their weighted photometry distribution matches the target sample. In this
work we estimate the \textit{selection bias} in redshift that is introduced in
this procedure. We do so by simulating the process of assembling a
spectroscopic sample (including observer-assigned confidence flags) and
highlight the impacts of spectroscopic target selection and redshift failures.
We use the first year (Y1) weak lensing analysis in DES as an example data set
but the implications generalise to all similar weak lensing surveys. We find
that using colour cuts that are not available to the weak lensing galaxies can
introduce biases of $\Delta~z\sim0.015$ in the weighted mean redshift of
different redshift intervals. To assess the impact of incompleteness in
spectroscopic samples, we select only objects with high observer-defined
confidence flags and compare the weighted mean redshift with the true mean. We
find that the mean redshift of the DES Y1 weak lensing sample is typically
biased at the $\Delta~z=0.005-0.05$ level after the weighting is applied. The
bias we uncover can have either sign, depending on the samples and redshift
interval considered. For the highest redshift bin, the bias is larger than the
uncertainties in the other DES Y1 redshift calibration methods, justifying the
decision of not using this method for the redshift estimations. We discuss
several methods to mitigate this bias.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11124 [pdf] - 2055421
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster
Abundances and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, Tim;
Aguena, Michel;
Alarcon, Alex;
Allam, Sahar;
Allen, Steve;
Annis, James;
Avila, Santiago;
Bacon, David;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bhargava, Sunayana;
Bocquet, Sebastian;
Brooks, David;
Brout, Dillon;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco Javier;
Cawthon, Ross;
Chang, Chihway;
Chen, Xinyi;
Choi, Ami;
Costanzi, Matteo;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz;
Davis, Tamara;
De Vicente, Juan;
DeRose, Joseph;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Eckert, Kathleen;
Eifler, Tim;
Elvin-Poole, Jack;
Estrada, Juan;
Everett, Spencer;
Evrard, August;
Farahi, Arya;
Ferrero, Ismael;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gatti, Marco;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Gerdes, David;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Giles, Paul;
Grandis, Sebastian;
Gruen, Daniel;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gschwend, Julia;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Hoyle, Ben;
Huterer, Dragan;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Johnson, Margaret;
Kent, Stephen;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kron, Richard;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lahav, Ofer;
Li, Ting;
Lidman, Christopher;
Lima, Marcos;
Lin, Huan;
MacCrann, Niall;
Maia, Marcio;
Mantz, Adam;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Mayers, Julian;
Melchior, Peter;
Mena, Juan;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miquel, Ramon;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Palmese, Antonella;
Paz-Chinchon, Francisco;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Prat, Judit;
Rau, Markus Michael;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rooney, Philip;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sako, Masao;
Samuroff, Simon;
Sanchez, Carles;
Saro, Alexandro;
Scarpine, Vic;
Schubnell, Michael;
Scolnic, Daniel;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Sheldon, Erin;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
To, Chun-Hao;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Tucker, Douglas;
Varga, Tamas Norbert;
von der Linden, Anja;
Walker, Alistair;
Wechsler, Risa;
Weller, Jochen;
Wilkinson, Reese;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yanny, Brian;
Zhang, Zhuowen;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2020-02-25
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of
redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset.
Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as
were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in
surprisingly low values for $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm
0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $\Omega_{\rm
m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $\sigma_8-\Omega_{\rm m}$ posteriors in
$2.4\sigma$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6\sigma$ with the
Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding
changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with
other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact
that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations,
cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster
analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence
of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant
physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent
constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest
that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather
than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness
threshold ($\lambda \ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other
probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by
our model.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05568 [pdf] - 1998159
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak
lensing mass maps -- validation on simulations
Gatti, M.;
Chang, C.;
Friedrich, O.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Ferrero, I.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Harrison, I.;
Jeffrey, N.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Secco, L.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13
We present a simulated cosmology analysis using the second and third moments
of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps. The analysis is geared towards the
third year (Y3) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), but the methodology can
be applied to other weak lensing data sets. The second moment, or variances, of
the convergence as a function of smoothing scale contains information similar
to standard shear 2-point statistics. The third moment, or the skewness,
contains additional non-Gaussian information. We present the formalism for
obtaining the convergence maps from the measured shear and for obtaining the
second and third moments of these maps given partial sky coverage. We estimate
the covariance matrix from a large suite of numerical simulations. We test our
pipeline through a simulated likelihood analyses varying 5 cosmological
parameters and 10 nuisance parameters. Our forecast shows that the combination
of second and third moments provides a 1.5 percent constraint on $S_8 \equiv
\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ for DES Y3 data. This is 20 percent better
than an analysis using a simulated DES Y3 shear 2-point statistics, owing to
the non-Gaussian information captured by the inclusion of higher-order
statistics. The methodology developed here can be applied to current and future
weak lensing datasets to make use of information from non-Gaussianity in the
cosmic density field and to improve constraints on cosmological parameters.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01386 [pdf] - 1996113
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and
light around cosmic voids
Fang, Y.;
Hamaus, N.;
Jain, B.;
Pandey, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Kovács, A.;
Chang, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Choi, A.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-09-03, last modified: 2019-11-11
What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use
two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC
galaxy sample to address this question. We use either 2D slices in projection,
or the 3D distribution of galaxies based on photometric redshifts to identify
voids. For the mass profile, we measure the tangential shear profiles of
background galaxies to infer the excess surface mass density. The
signal-to-noise ratio for our lensing measurement ranges between 10.7 and 14.0
for the two void samples. We infer their 3D density profiles by fitting models
based on N-body simulations and find good agreement for void radii in the range
15-85 Mpc. Comparison with their galaxy profiles then allows us to test the
relation between mass and light at the 10%-level, the most stringent test to
date. We find very similar shapes for the two profiles, consistent with a
linear relationship between mass and light both within and outside the void
radius. We validate our analysis with the help of simulated mock catalogues and
estimate the impact of photometric redshift uncertainties on the measurement.
Our methodology can be used for cosmological applications, including tests of
gravity with voids. This is especially promising when the lensing profiles are
combined with spectroscopic measurements of void dynamics via redshift-space
distortions.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02499 [pdf] - 1995367
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological
Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, S.;
Lemos, P.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Raveri, M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-11-08
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models
dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a
combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the
first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external
data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated
scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $\Omega_k$, 2) number of relativistic species
$N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying
equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$
(alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$),
and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ that
modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck
CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements
from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on
curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external
data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find
$\Omega_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm
eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying
equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23},
-0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p,
w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1
combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the
temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the
present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $\Sigma_0=
0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(\Sigma_0,
\mu_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with
external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.02951 [pdf] - 1995564
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: the lensing imprint of cosmic voids
on the Cosmic Microwave Background
Vielzeuf, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Demirbozan, U.;
Fosalba, P.;
Baxter, E.;
Hamaus, N.;
Huterer, D.;
Miquel, R.;
Nadathur, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchón, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Noarbe, I. Sevilla-;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2019-11-06
Cosmic voids gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
radiation, resulting in a distinct imprint on degree scales. We use the
simulated CMB lensing convergence map from the MICE N-body simulation to
calibrate our detection strategy for a given void definition and galaxy tracer
density. We then identify cosmic voids in DES Year 1 data and stack the Planck
2015 lensing convergence map on their locations, probing the consistency of
simulated and observed void lensing signals. When fixing the shape of the
stacked convergence profile to that calibrated from simulations, we find
imprints at the $3{\sigma}$ significance level for various analysis choices.
The best measurement strategies based on the MICE calibration process yield
$S/N \sim 4$ for DES Y1, and the best-fit amplitude recovered from the data is
consistent with expectations from MICE ($A \sim 1$). Given these results as
well as the agreement between them and N-body simulations, we conclude that the
previously reported excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) signal associated with
cosmic voids in DES Y1 has no counterpart in the Planck CMB lensing map.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.05005 [pdf] - 1938344
Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to
characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
Buchs, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Sánchez, C.;
Myles, J.;
Roodman, A.;
Allen, S.;
Amon, A.;
Choi, A.;
Masters, D. C.;
Miquel, R.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruend, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2019-01-15, last modified: 2019-08-05
Wide-field imaging surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) rely on
coarse measurements of spectral energy distributions in a few filters to
estimate the redshift distribution of source galaxies. In this regime, sample
variance, shot noise, and selection effects limit the attainable accuracy of
redshift calibration and thus of cosmological constraints. We present a new
method to combine wide-field, few-filter measurements with catalogs from deep
fields with additional filters and sufficiently low photometric noise to break
degeneracies in photometric redshifts. The multi-band deep field is used as an
intermediary between wide-field observations and accurate redshifts, greatly
reducing sample variance, shot noise, and selection effects. Our implementation
of the method uses self-organizing maps to group galaxies into phenotypes based
on their observed fluxes, and is tested using a mock DES catalog created from
N-body simulations. It yields a typical uncertainty on the mean redshift in
each of five tomographic bins for an idealized simulation of the DES Year 3
weak-lensing tomographic analysis of $\sigma_{\Delta z} = 0.007$, which is a
60% improvement compared to the Year 1 analysis. Although the implementation of
the method is tailored to DES, its formalism can be applied to other large
photometric surveys with a similar observing strategy.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.04599 [pdf] - 1929679
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The effect of intracluster light on
photometric redshifts for weak gravitational lensing
Gruen, D.;
Zhang, Y.;
Palmese, A.;
Yanny, B.;
Busti, V.;
Hoyle, B.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-09-12, last modified: 2019-08-03
We study the effect of diffuse intracluster light on the critical surface
mass density estimated from photometric redshifts of lensing source galaxies,
and the resulting bias in a weak lensing measurement of galaxy cluster mass.
Under conservative assumptions, we find the bias to be negligible for imaging
surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) with a recommended scale cut of >=200
kpc distance from cluster centers. For significantly deeper source catalogs
from present and future surveys like the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)
program, more conservative scale and source magnitude cuts or a correction of
the effect may be necessary to achieve per-cent level lensing measurement
accuracy, especially at the massive end of the cluster population.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02212 [pdf] - 1922933
Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT and Planck
Prat, J.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Shin, T.;
Sánchez, C.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Nicola, A.;
Omori, Y.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Chown, R.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, W. B.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
de Haan, T.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Knox, L.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-07-25
Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational
lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the
expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such
correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter
distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes.
Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit
available signal-to-noise down to small angular scales, even where directly
modeling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of
lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy
Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck,
obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to
the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, we find a best fit lensing ratio amplitude
of $A = 1.1 \pm 0.1$. We use the ratio measurements to generate cosmological
constraints, focusing on the curvature parameter. We demonstrate that
photometrically selected galaxies can be used to measure lensing ratios, and
argue that future lensing ratio measurements with data from a combination of
LSST and Stage-4 CMB experiments can be used to place interesting cosmological
constraints, even after considering the systematic uncertainties associated
with photometric redshift and galaxy shear estimation.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07193 [pdf] - 2113957
A DECam Search for Explosive Optical Transients Associated with IceCube
Neutrinos
Morgan, R.;
Bechtol, K.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Herner, K.;
Doctor, Z.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Neilson, K. N.;
Kowalski, M.;
Palmese, A.;
Swann, E.;
Thomas, B. P.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Garcia, A.;
Brout, D.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Neilsen, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-07-16
To facilitate multimessenger studies with TeV and PeV astrophysical
neutrinos, the IceCube Collaboration has developed a realtime alert system for
the highest confidence and best localized neutrino events. In this work we
investigate the likelihood of association between realtime high-energy neutrino
alerts and explosive optical transients, with a focus on core-collapse
supernovae (CC SNe) as candidate neutrino sources. We report results from
triggered optical follow-up observations of two IceCube alerts, IC170922A and
IC171106A, with Blanco/DECam ($gri$ to 24th magnitude in $\sim6$ epochs). Based
on a suite of simulated supernova light curves, we develop and validate
selection criteria for CC SNe exploding in coincidence with neutrino alerts.
The DECam observations are sensitive to CC SNe at redshifts $z \lesssim 0.3$.
At redshifts $z \lesssim 0.1$, our selection criteria reduce background SNe
contamination to a level below the predicted signal. For the IC170922A
(IC171106A) follow-up observations, we expect that 12.1% (9.5%) of coincident
CC SNe at $z \lesssim 0.3$ are recovered, and that on average, 0.23 (0.07)
unassociated SNe in the 90% containment regions also pass our selection
criteria. We find two total candidate CC SNe that are temporally coincident
with the neutrino alerts, but none in the 90% containment regions, which is
statistically consistent with expected rates of background CC SNe for these
observations. Given the signal efficiencies and background rates derived from
this pilot study, we estimate that to determine whether CC SNe are the dominant
contribution to the total TeV-PeV energy IceCube neutrino flux at the $3\sigma$
confidence level, DECam observations similar to those of this work would be
needed for $\sim200$ neutrino alerts, though this number falls to $\sim60$
neutrino alerts if redshift information is available for all candidates.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01136 [pdf] - 1966790
Producing a BOSS-CMASS sample with DES imaging
Lee, S.;
Huff, E. M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Choi, A.;
Hirata, C.;
Honscheid, K.;
MacCrann, N.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Cawthon, R.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-03
We present a sample of galaxies with the Dark Energy Survey (DES) photometry
that replicates the properties of the BOSS CMASS sample. The CMASS galaxy
sample has been well characterized by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)
collaboration and was used to obtain the most powerful redshift-space galaxy
clustering measurements to date. A joint analysis of redshift-space distortions
(such as those probed by CMASS from SDSS) and a galaxy-galaxy lensing
measurement for an equivalent sample from DES can provide powerful cosmological
constraints. Unfortunately, the DES and SDSS-BOSS footprints have only minimal
overlap, primarily on the celestial equator near the SDSS Stripe 82 region.
Using this overlap, we build a robust Bayesian model to select CMASS-like
galaxies in the remainder of the DES footprint. The newly defined DES-CMASS
(DMASS) sample consists of 117,293 effective galaxies covering $1,244 {\rm
deg}^2$. Through various validation tests, we show that the DMASS sample
selected by this model matches well with the BOSS CMASS sample, specifically in
the South Galactic cap (SGC) region that includes Stripe 82. Combining
measurements of the angular correlation function and the clustering-z
distribution of DMASS, we constrain the difference in mean galaxy bias and mean
redshift between the BOSS CMASS and DMASS samples to be $\Delta b =
0.010^{+0.045}_{-0.052}$ and $\Delta z = \left( 3.46^{+5.48}_{-5.55} \right)
\times 10^{-3}$ for the SGC portion of CMASS, and $\Delta b =
0.044^{+0.044}_{-0.043} $ and $\Delta z= ( 3.51^{+4.93}_{-5.91}) \times
10^{-3}$ for the full CMASS sample. These values indicate that the mean bias of
galaxies and mean redshift in the DMASS sample is consistent with both CMASS
samples within $1\sigma$.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02374 [pdf] - 1880991
First Cosmology Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy
Survey: Constraints on Cosmological Parameters
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Angus, C.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, P.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gonzalez-Gaitan, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kovacs, E.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pursiainen, M.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Spinka, H.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swann, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wiseman, P.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-10
We present the first cosmological parameter constraints using measurements of
type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
(DES-SN). The analysis uses a subsample of 207 spectroscopically confirmed SNe
Ia from the first three years of DES-SN, combined with a low-redshift sample of
122 SNe from the literature. Our "DES-SN3YR" result from these 329 SNe Ia is
based on a series of companion analyses and improvements covering SN Ia
discovery, spectroscopic selection, photometry, calibration, distance bias
corrections, and evaluation of systematic uncertainties. For a flat LCDM model
we find a matter density Omega_m = 0.331 +_ 0.038. For a flat wCDM model, and
combining our SN Ia constraints with those from the cosmic microwave background
(CMB), we find a dark energy equation of state w = -0.978 +_ 0.059, and Omega_m
= 0.321 +_ 0.018. For a flat w0waCDM model, and combining probes from SN Ia,
CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, we find w0 = -0.885 +_ 0.114 and wa =
-0.387 +_ 0.430. These results are in agreement with a cosmological constant
and with previous constraints using SNe Ia (Pantheon, JLA).
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.13347 [pdf] - 1966740
Constraints on the redshift evolution of astrophysical feedback with
Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect cross-correlations
Pandey, S.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Xu, Z.;
Orlowski-Scherer, J.;
Zhu, N.;
Lidz, A.;
Aguirre, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Devlin, M.;
Hill, J. C.;
Jain, B.;
Sheth, R. K.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2019-04-30
An understanding of astrophysical feedback is important for constraining
models of galaxy formation and for extracting cosmological information from
current and future weak lensing surveys. The thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect,
quantified via the Compton-$y$ parameter, is a powerful tool for studying
feedback, because it directly probes the pressure of the hot, ionized gas
residing in dark matter halos. Cross-correlations between galaxies and maps of
Compton-$y$ obtained from cosmic microwave background surveys are sensitive to
the redshift evolution of the gas pressure, and its dependence on halo mass. In
this work, we use galaxies identified in year one data from the Dark Energy
Survey and Compton-$y$ maps constructed from Planck observations. We find
highly significant (roughly $12\sigma$) detections of galaxy-$y$
cross-correlation in multiple redshift bins. By jointly fitting these
measurements as well as measurements of galaxy clustering, we constrain the
halo bias-weighted, gas pressure of the Universe as a function of redshift
between $0.15 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.75$. We compare these measurements to
predictions from hydrodynamical simulations, allowing us to constrain the
amount of thermal energy in the halo gas relative to that resulting from
gravitational collapse.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.07812 [pdf] - 1830517
More out of less: an excess integrated Sachs-Wolfe signal from
supervoids mapped out by the Dark Energy Survey
Kovács, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Hamaus, N.;
Miranda, V.;
Nadathur, S.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruendl, R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, K.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-19, last modified: 2019-01-29
The largest structures in the cosmic web probe the dynamical nature of dark
energy through their integrated Sachs-Wolfe imprints. In the strength of the
signal, typical cosmic voids have shown good consistency with expectation
$A_{\rm ISW}=\Delta T^{\rm data} / \Delta T^{\rm theory}=1$, given the
substantial cosmic variance. Discordantly, large-scale hills in the
gravitational potential, or supervoids, have shown excess signals. In this
study, we mapped out 87 new supervoids in the total 5000 deg$^2$ footprint of
the Dark Energy Survey at $0.2<z<0.9$ to probe these anomalous claims. We found
an excess imprinted profile with $ A_{\rm ISW}\approx4.1\pm2.0$ amplitude. The
combination with independent BOSS data reveals an ISW imprint of supervoids at
the $3.3\sigma$ significance level with an enhanced $A_{\rm
ISW}\approx5.2\pm1.6$ amplitude. The tension with $\Lambda$CDM predictions is
equivalent to $2.6\sigma$ and remains unexplained.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.02401 [pdf] - 1811355
The Buzzard Flock: Dark Energy Survey Synthetic Sky Catalogs
DeRose, Joseph;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Becker, Matthew R.;
Busha, Michael T.;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
MacCrann, Niall;
Erickson, Brandon;
Evrard, August E.;
Kravtsov, Andrey;
Gruen, Daniel;
Allam, Sahar;
Avila, Santiago;
Bridle, Sarah;
Brooks, David;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Cawthon, Ross;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz N.;
Davis, Christopher;
De Vicente, Juan;
Dietrich, Jörg P.;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will G.;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Hoyle, Ben;
James, David J.;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lima, Marcos;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miller, Christopher J.;
Miquel, Ramon;
Ogando, Ricardo L. C.;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Romer, A. Kathy;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Schindler, Rafe;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio;
Smith, Mathew;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly E. C.;
Tarle, Gregory;
Vikram, Vinu
Submitted: 2019-01-08
We present a suite of 18 synthetic sky catalogs designed to support science
analysis of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data. For each
catalog, we use a computationally efficient empirical approach, ADDGALS, to
embed galaxies within light-cone outputs of three dark matter simulations that
resolve halos with masses above ~5x10^12 h^-1 m_sun at z <= 0.32 and 10^13 h^-1
m_sun at z~2. The embedding method is tuned to match the observed evolution of
galaxy counts at different luminosities as well as the spatial clustering of
the galaxy population. Galaxies are lensed by matter along the line of sight
--- including magnification, shear, and multiple images --- using CALCLENS, an
algorithm that calculates shear with 0.42 arcmin resolution at galaxy positions
in the full catalog. The catalogs presented here, each with the same LCDM
cosmology (denoted Buzzard), contain on average 820 million galaxies over an
area of 1120 square degrees with positions, magnitudes, shapes, photometric
errors, and photometric redshift estimates. We show that the weak-lensing shear
catalog, redMaGiC galaxy catalogs and redMaPPer cluster catalogs provide
plausible realizations of the same catalogs in the DES Y1 data by comparing
their magnitude, color and redshift distributions, angular clustering, and
mass-observable relations, making them useful for testing analyses that use
these samples. We make public the galaxy samples appropriate for the DES Y1
data, as well as the data vectors used for cosmology analyses on these
simulations.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06211 [pdf] - 1798221
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Avila, S.;
Alarcon, A.;
Chan, K. C.;
Banik, N.;
Carretero, J.;
Sanchez, E.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Sanchez, C.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sako, M.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-12-14
We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from
the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic
Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample
is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts $z \gtrsim 0.6$. We
define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need
of high number densities and small photometric redshift uncertainties, using
the corresponding forecasted BAO distance error as a figure-of-merit in the
process. The typical photo-$z$ uncertainty varies from $2.3\%$ to $3.6\%$ (in
units of 1+$z$) from $z=0.6$ to $1$, with number densities from $200$ to $130$
galaxies per deg$^2$ in tomographic bins of width $\Delta z = 0.1$. Next we
summarise the validation of the photometric redshift estimation. We
characterise and mitigate observational systematics including stellar
contamination, and show that the clustering on large scales is robust in front
of those contaminants. We show that the clustering signal in the
auto-correlations and cross-correlations is generally consistent with
theoretical models, which serves as an additional test of the redshift
distributions.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06209 [pdf] - 1794662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic
Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Camacho, H.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manera, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-12-09
We present angular diameter distance measurements obtained by locating the
BAO scale in the distribution of galaxies selected from the first year of Dark
Energy Survey data. We consider a sample of over 1.3 million galaxies
distributed over a footprint of 1318 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1$ and
a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. This sample was selected, as
fully described in a companion paper, using a color/magnitude selection that
optimizes trade-offs between number density and redshift uncertainty. We
investigate the BAO signal in the projected clustering using three conventions,
the angular separation, the co-moving transverse separation, and spherical
harmonics. Further, we compare results obtained from template based and machine
learning photometric redshift determinations. We use 1800 simulations that
approximate our sample in order to produce covariance matrices and allow us to
validate our distance scale measurement methodology. We measure the angular
diameter distance, $D_A$, at the effective redshift of our sample divided by
the true physical scale of the BAO feature, $r_{\rm d}$. We obtain close to a 4
per cent distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff}=0.81)/r_{\rm d} = 10.75\pm
0.43 $. These results are consistent with the flat $\Lambda$CDM concordance
cosmological model supported by numerous other recent experimental results. All
data products are publicly available here:
https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y1a1/bao
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.09795 [pdf] - 1785791
DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using
simulated Dark Energy Surveys
MacCrann, N.;
DeRose, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Blazek, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Crocce, M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Jain, B.;
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gruen, D.;
Zuntz, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Prat, J.;
Wang, M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Busha, M. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Huterer, D.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-03-26, last modified: 2018-11-14
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter
estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and
real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1
cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of
galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide
independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological
analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and
uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak
lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins.
While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations
available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is
consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1
realizations in the $\Omega_m-\sigma_8$ plane. For one of the suites, we are
able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred
$S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ and $\Omega_m$ are smaller than the DES Y1
$1-\sigma$ uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer
realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive; we infer a roughly 70%
probability that systematic biases in the recovered $\Omega_m$ and $S_8$ are
sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind
become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using
survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02441 [pdf] - 1945701
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1
galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
Omori, Y.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Kirk, D.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Simard, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak
lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an
effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements
from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing
with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this
significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest
signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the
correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the
correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias,
obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally,
when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain
the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and
$S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$.
These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies,
galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.05257 [pdf] - 1811023
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint
Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point
Functions
Baxter, E. J.;
Omori, Y.;
Chang, C.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Choi, A.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Pandey, S.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-02-14, last modified: 2018-10-04
Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational
lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) collaboration used a joint fit to two-point correlations between these
observables to place tight constraints on cosmology (DES Collaboration et al.
2017). In this work, we develop the methodology to extend the DES year one
joint probes analysis to include cross-correlations of the optical survey
observables with gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
as measured by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Using simulated
analyses, we show how the resulting set of five two-point functions increases
the robustness of the cosmological constraints to systematic errors in galaxy
lensing shear calibration. Additionally, we show that contamination of the
SPT+Planck CMB lensing map by the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is a
potentially large source of systematic error for two-point function analyses,
but show that it can be reduced to acceptable levels in our analysis by masking
clusters of galaxies and imposing angular scale cuts on the two-point
functions. The methodology developed here will be applied to the analysis of
data from the DES, the SPT, and Planck in a companion work.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02342 [pdf] - 1929685
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: tomographic cross-correlations
between DES galaxies and CMB lensing from SPT+Planck
Omori, Y.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Porredon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Alarcon, A.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Muir, J.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Simard, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We measure the cross-correlation between redMaGiC galaxies selected from the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-1 data and gravitational lensing of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) reconstructed from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and
Planck data over 1289 sq. deg. When combining measurements across multiple
galaxy redshift bins spanning the redshift range of $0.15<z<0.90$, we reject
the hypothesis of no correlation at 19.9$\sigma$ significance. When removing
small-scale data points where thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal and nonlinear
galaxy bias could potentially bias our results, the detection significance is
reduced to 9.9$\sigma$. We perform a joint analysis of galaxy-CMB lensing
cross-correlations and galaxy clustering to constrain cosmology, finding
$\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.276^{+0.029}_{-0.030}$ and
$S_{8}=\sigma_{8}\sqrt{\mathstrut \Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.800^{+0.090}_{-0.094}$. We also perform two alternate analyses aimed at
constraining only the growth rate of cosmic structure as a function of
redshift, finding consistency with predictions from the concordance
$\Lambda$CDM model. The measurements presented here are part of a joint
cosmological analysis that combines galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing and CMB
lensing using data from DES, SPT and Planck.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.07298 [pdf] - 1760974
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC Redshift
Distributions in DES and SDSS from Cross-Correlations
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rozo, E.;
Frieman, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-19, last modified: 2018-10-03
We present calibrations of the redshift distributions of redMaGiC galaxies in
the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR8
data. These results determine the priors of the redshift distribution of
redMaGiC galaxies, which were used for galaxy clustering measurements and as
lenses for galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements in DES Y1 cosmological analyses.
We empirically determine the bias in redMaGiC photometric redshift estimates
using angular cross-correlations with Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
(BOSS) galaxies. For DES, we calibrate a single parameter redshift bias in
three photometric redshift bins: $z \in[0.15,0.3]$, [0.3,0.45], and [0.45,0.6].
Our best fit results in each bin give photometric redshift biases of $|\Delta
z|<0.01$. To further test the redMaGiC algorithm, we apply our calibration
procedure to SDSS redMaGiC galaxies, where the statistical precision of the
cross-correlation measurement is much higher due to a greater overlap with BOSS
galaxies. For SDSS, we also find best fit results of $|\Delta z|<0.01$. We
compare our results to other analyses of redMaGiC photometric redshifts.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.00591 [pdf] - 1751774
New Science, New Media: An Assessment of the Online Education and Public
Outreach Initiatives of The Dark Energy Survey
Wolf, R. C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Nord, B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Biron, L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Das, R.;
Ferte, A.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Jennings, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Li, T. S.;
Lingard, T.;
Moller, A.;
Muir, J.;
Nagasawa, D. Q.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-02, last modified: 2018-09-18
As large-scale international collaborations become the standard for astronomy
research, a wealth of opportunities have emerged to create innovative education
and public outreach (EPO) programming. In the past two decades, large
collaborations have focused EPO strategies around published data products.
Newer collaborations have begun to explore other avenues of public engagement
before and after data are made available. We present a case study of the online
EPO program of The Dark Energy Survey, currently one of the largest
international astronomy collaborations actively taking data. DES EPO is unique
at this scale in astronomy, as far as we are aware, as it evolved organically
from scientists' passion for EPO and is entirely organized and implemented by
the volunteer efforts of collaboration scientists. We summarize the strategy
and implementation of eight EPO initiatives. For content distributed via social
media, we present reach and user statistics over the 2016 calendar year. DES
EPO online products reached ~2,500 users per post, and 94% of these users
indicate a predisposition to science-related interests. We find no obvious
correlation between post type and post reach, with the most popular posts
featuring the intersections of science and art and/or popular culture. We
conclude that one key issue of the online DES EPO program was designing
material which would inspire new interest in science. The greatest difficulty
of the online DES EPO program was sustaining scientist participation and
collaboration support; the most successful programs are those which capitalized
on the hobbies of participating scientists. We present statistics and
recommendations, along with observations from individual experience, as a
potentially instructive resource for scientists or EPO professionals interested
in organizing EPO programs and partnerships for large science collaborations or
organizations.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01537 [pdf] - 1743609
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Fang, Y.;
Gruen, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Kokron, N.;
Secco, L. F.;
Jain, B.;
Miquel, R.;
MacCrann, N.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-09-04
We present galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from 1321 sq. deg. of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) data. The lens sample consists of a selection
of 660,000 red galaxies with high-precision photometric redshifts, known as
redMaGiC, split into five tomographic bins in the redshift range $0.15 < z <
0.9$. We use two different source samples, obtained from the Metacalibration
(26 million galaxies) and Im3shape (18 million galaxies) shear estimation
codes, which are split into four photometric redshift bins in the range $0.2 <
z < 1.3$. We perform extensive testing of potential systematic effects that can
bias the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation,
photometric redshifts, and observational properties. Covariances are obtained
from jackknife subsamples of the data and validated with a suite of log-normal
simulations. We use the shear-ratio geometric test to obtain independent
constraints on the mean of the source redshift distributions, providing
validation of those obtained from other photo-$z$ studies with the same data.
We find consistency between the galaxy bias estimates obtained from our
galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements and from galaxy clustering, therefore
showing the galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient $r$ to be consistent
with one, measured over the scales used for the cosmological analysis. The
results in this work present one of the three two-point correlation functions,
along with galaxy clustering and cosmic shear, used in the DES cosmological
analysis of Y1 data, and hence the methodology and the systematics tests
presented here provide a critical input for that study as well as for future
cosmological analyses in DES and other photometric galaxy surveys.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.10163 [pdf] - 1897837
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Galaxy Angular
Power Spectrum
Camacho, H.;
Kokron, N.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Lima, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sobreira, F.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Avila, S.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Troja, A.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lin, H.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-07-26
We use data from the first-year (Y1) observations of the DES collaboration to
measure the galaxy angular power spectrum (APS), and search for its BAO feature
using a template-fitting method. We test our methodology in a sample of 1800
DES Y1-like mock catalogs. The APS is measured with the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method,
using pixelized maps constructed from the mock catalogs and the DES mask. The
covariance matrix of the $C_\ell$'s in these tests are also obtained from the
mock catalogs. We use templates to model the measured spectra and estimate
template parameters firstly from the $C_\ell$'s of the mocks using two
different methods, a maximum likelihood estimator and a MCMC, finding
consistent results with a good reduced $\chi^2$. Robustness tests are performed
to estimate the impact of different choices of settings used in our analysis.
After these tests on mocks, we apply our method to a galaxy sample constructed
from DES Y1 data specifically for LSS studies. This catalog comprises galaxies
within an effective area of 1318 deg$^2$ and $0.6<z<1.0$. We fit the observed
spectra with our optimized templates, considering models with and without BAO
features. We find that the DES Y1 data favors a model with BAO at the
$2.6\,\sigma$ C.L. with a best-fit shift parameter of $\alpha=1.023\pm 0.047$.
However, the goodness-of-fit is somewhat poor, with $\chi^2/$(dof) = 1.49. We
identify a possible cause of this issue and show that using a theoretical
covariance matrix obtained from $C_\ell$'s that are better adjusted to data
results in an improved value of $\chi^2/$(dof) = 1.36 which is similar to the
value obtained with the real-space analysis. Our results correspond to a
distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff} = 0.81)/r_d = 10.65 \pm 0.49$,
consistent with the main DES BAO findings. This is a companion paper to the
main DES BAO article showing the details of the harmonic space analysis.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05045 [pdf] - 1722433
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and
lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Krause, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hilbert, S.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Prat, J.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-10-13, last modified: 2018-07-24
We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03097 [pdf] - 1728846
Stellar Streams Discovered in the Dark Energy Survey
Shipp, N.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Balbinot, E.;
Ferguson, P.;
Erkal, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Belokurov, V.;
Buncher, B.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Kuehn, K.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Pace, A. B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Strigari, L.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2018-01-09
We perform a search for stellar streams around the Milky Way using the first
three years of multi-band optical imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES). We use DES data covering $\sim 5000$ sq. deg. to a depth of $g > 23.5$
with a relative photometric calibration uncertainty of $< 1 \%$. This data set
yields unprecedented sensitivity to the stellar density field in the southern
celestial hemisphere, enabling the detection of faint stellar streams to a
heliocentric distance of $\sim 50$ kpc. We search for stellar streams using a
matched-filter in color-magnitude space derived from a synthetic isochrone of
an old, metal-poor stellar population. Our detection technique recovers four
previously known thin stellar streams: Phoenix, ATLAS, Tucana III, and a
possible extension of Molonglo. In addition, we report the discovery of eleven
new stellar streams. In general, the new streams detected by DES are fainter,
more distant, and lower surface brightness than streams detected by similar
techniques in previous photometric surveys. As a by-product of our stellar
stream search, we find evidence for extra-tidal stellar structure associated
with four globular clusters: NGC 288, NGC 1261, NGC 1851, and NGC 1904. The
ever-growing sample of stellar streams will provide insight into the formation
of the Galactic stellar halo, the Milky Way gravitational potential, as well as
the large- and small-scale distribution of dark matter around the Milky Way.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01535 [pdf] - 1637501
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Curved-Sky Weak Lensing Mass Map
Chang, C.;
Pujol, A.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Jain, B.;
Leistedt, B.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Alarcon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2017-12-19
We construct the largest curved-sky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES first-year (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signal-to-noise map, the ratio between the mean signal-to-noise in the E-mode
and the B-mode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
cross-correlation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.02517 [pdf] - 1589408
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts in the
DES -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-06
We present the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) weak
lensing source galaxy redshift distributions from clustering measurements. By
cross-correlating the positions of source galaxies with luminous red galaxies
selected by the redMaGiC algorithm we measure the redshift distributions of the
source galaxies as placed into different tomographic bins. These measurements
constrain any such shifts to an accuracy of $\sim0.02$ and can be computed even
when the clustering measurements do not span the full redshift range. The
highest-redshift source bin is not constrained by the clustering measurements
because of the minimal redshift overlap with the redMaGiC galaxies. We compare
our constraints with those obtained from $\texttt{COSMOS}$ 30-band photometry
and find that our two very different methods produce consistent constraints.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.08256 [pdf] - 1663185
Cross-Correlation Redshift Calibration Without Spectroscopic Calibration
Samples in DES Science Verification Data
Davis, C.;
Rozo, E.;
Roodman, A.;
Alarcon, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Gatti, M.;
Lin, H.;
Miquel, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2017-07-25
Galaxy cross-correlations with high-fidelity redshift samples hold the
potential to precisely calibrate systematic photometric redshift uncertainties
arising from the unavailability of complete and representative training and
validation samples of galaxies. However, application of this technique in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) is hampered by the relatively low number density,
small area, and modest redshift overlap between photometric and spectroscopic
samples. We propose instead using photometric catalogs with reliable
photometric redshifts for photo-z calibration via cross-correlations. We verify
the viability of our proposal using redMaPPer clusters from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) to successfully recover the redshift distribution of SDSS
spectroscopic galaxies. We demonstrate how to combine photo-z with
cross-correlation data to calibrate photometric redshift biases while
marginalizing over possible clustering bias evolution in either the calibration
or unknown photometric samples. We apply our method to DES Science Verification
(DES SV) data in order to constrain the photometric redshift distribution of a
galaxy sample selected for weak lensing studies, constraining the mean of the
tomographic redshift distributions to a statistical uncertainty of $\Delta z
\sim \pm 0.01$. We forecast that our proposal can in principle control
photometric redshift uncertainties in DES weak lensing experiments at a level
near the intrinsic statistical noise of the experiment over the range of
redshifts where redMaPPer clusters are available. Our results provide strong
motivation to launch a program to fully characterize the systematic errors from
bias evolution and photo-z shapes in our calibration procedure.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05551 [pdf] - 1341811
CMB lensing tomography with the DES Science Verification galaxies
Giannantonio, T.;
Fosalba, P.;
Cawthon, R.;
Omori, Y.;
Crocce, M.;
Elsner, F.;
Leistedt, B.;
Dodelson, S.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Holder, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Carretero, J.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crittenden, R.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Krause, E.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ross, A. J.;
Simard, G.;
Soergel, B.;
Stark, A.;
Story, K. T.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Weller, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Saliwanchik, B. R.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2016-01-18
We measure the cross-correlation between the galaxy density in the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and the lensing of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) as reconstructed with the Planck satellite and the
South Pole Telescope (SPT). When using the DES main galaxy sample over the full
redshift range $0.2 < z < 1.2$, a cross-correlation signal is detected at $6
\sigma$ and $4\sigma$ with SPT and Planck respectively. We then divide the DES
galaxies into five photometric redshift bins, finding significant ($>$$2
\sigma$) detections in all bins. Comparing to the fiducial Planck cosmology, we
find the redshift evolution of the signal matches expectations, although the
amplitude is consistently lower than predicted across redshift bins. We test
for possible systematics that could affect our result and find no evidence for
significant contamination. Finally, we demonstrate how these measurements can
be used to constrain the growth of structure across cosmic time. We find the
data are fit by a model in which the amplitude of structure in the $z<1.2$
universe is $0.73 \pm 0.16$ times as large as predicted in the LCDM Planck
cosmology, a $1.7\sigma$ deviation.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05360 [pdf] - 1327439
Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in
the DES Science Verification data
Crocce, M.;
Carretero, J.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sanchez, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Sanchez, C.;
Bonnett, C.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Brunner, R. J.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Cawthon, R.;
Fosalba, P.;
Hartley, W.;
Kim, E. J.;
Leistedt, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Santiago, B.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-19, last modified: 2015-12-15
We study the clustering of galaxies detected at $i<22.5$ in the Science
Verification observations of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Two-point
correlation functions are measured using $2.3\times 10^6$ galaxies over a
contiguous 116 deg$^2$ region in five bins of photometric redshift width
$\Delta z = 0.2$ in the range $0.2 < z < 1.2.$ The impact of photometric
redshift errors are assessed by comparing results using a template-based
photo-$z$ algorithm (BPZ) to a machine-learning algorithm (TPZ). A companion
paper (Leistedt et al 2015) presents maps of several observational variables
(e.g. seeing, sky brightness) which could modulate the galaxy density. Here we
characterize and mitigate systematic errors on the measured clustering which
arise from these observational variables, in addition to others such as
Galactic dust and stellar contamination. After correcting for systematic
effects we measure galaxy bias over a broad range of linear scales relative to
mass clustering predicted from the Planck $\Lambda$CDM model, finding agreement
with CFHTLS measurements with $\chi^2$ of 4.0 (8.7) with 5 degrees of freedom
for the TPZ (BPZ) redshifts. We test a "linear bias" model, in which the galaxy
clustering is a fixed multiple of the predicted non-linear dark-matter
clustering. The precision of the data allow us to determine that the linear
bias model describes the observed galaxy clustering to $2.5\%$ accuracy down to
scales at least $4$ to $10$ times smaller than those on which linear theory is
expected to be sufficient.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04535 [pdf] - 1378743
Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification
data with SPT and Planck lensing
Kirk, D.;
Omori, Y.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Larsen, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Holder, G.;
Jain, B.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Sheldon, E.;
Story, K. T.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We measure the cross-correlation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on
different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass
fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg$^{2}$ of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from
the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a
median redshift of $z_{\rm med} {\sim} 0.7$, while the CMB lensing kernel is
broad and peaks at $z{\sim}2$. The resulting cross-correlation is maximally
sensitive to mass fluctuations at $z{\sim}0.44$. Assuming the Planck 2015
best-fit cosmology, the amplitude of the DES$\times$SPT cross-power is found to
be $A = 0.88 \pm 0.30$ and that from DES$\times$Planck to be $A = 0.86 \pm
0.39$, where $A=1$ corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are
consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of $2.9
\sigma$ and $2.2 \sigma$ respectively. We demonstrate that our results are
robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear
measurement method, estimator choice, photometric redshift uncertainty and CMB
lensing systematics. Significant intrinsic alignment of galaxy shapes would
increase the cross-correlation signal inferred from the data; we calculate a
value of $A = 1.08 \pm 0.36$ for DES$\times$SPT when we correct the
observations with a simple IA model. With three measurements of this
cross-correlation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable
evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of cross-correlation,
given the size of the statistical uncertainties and the significant impact of
systematic errors, particularly IAs. We provide forecasts for the expected
signal-to-noise of the combination of the five-year DES survey and SPT-3G.