Normalized to: Castro-Ginard, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.01690 [pdf] - 2105867
The Milky Way's cluster age function in light of Gaia DR2
Submitted: 2020-06-02
We perform a systematic reanalysis of the age distribution of Galactic open
star clusters. Using a catalogue of homogeneously determined ages for 834 open
clusters contained in a 2 kpc cylinder around the Sun and characterised with
astrometric and photometric data from the Gaia satellite, we find that it is
necessary to revise earlier works that relied on data from the Milky Way Star
Cluster survey. After establishing age-dependent completeness limits for our
sample, we find that the cluster age function in the range $6.5 < \log t<10$ is
compatible with a Schechter-type or broken power-law function, whose parameters
we determine by MCMC fitting. Our best-fit values indicate an earlier drop of
the age function (by a factor of $2-3$) with respect to the results obtained in
the last five years, and are instead more compatible with results obtained in
the early 2000s and radio observations of inner-disc clusters. Furthermore, we
find excellent agreement with the dynamical cluster formation and destruction
models of Lamers et al. (2005), indicating a typical destruction time-scale of
$\sim1.5$ Gyr for a $10^4\, {\rm M}_{\odot}$ cluster and a present-day
cluster-formation rate of $\sim 0.6\pm 0.1$ Myr$^{-1}$kpc$^{-2}$, suggesting
that only $8-15\, \%$ of all stars born in the solar neighbourhood form in
bound clusters. Accurate cluster-mass measurements are now needed to place more
precise constraints on open-cluster formation and evolution models.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.07274 [pdf] - 2104771
Painting a portrait of the Galactic disc with its stellar clusters
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Anders, F.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Romero-Gomez, M.;
Soubiran, C.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Tarricq, Y.;
Moitinho, A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kounkel, M.
Submitted: 2020-04-15, last modified: 2020-06-01
The large astrometric and photometric survey performed by the Gaia mission
allows for a panoptic view of the Galactic disc and in its stellar cluster
population. Hundreds of clusters were only discovered after the latest G data
release (DR2) and have yet to be characterised. Here we make use of the deep
and homogeneous Gaia photometry down to G=18 to estimate the distance, age, and
interstellar reddening for about 2000 clusters identified with Gaia~DR2
astrometry. We use these objects to study the structure and evolution of the
Galactic disc. We rely on a set of objects with well-determined parameters in
the literature to train an artificial neural network to estimate parameters
from the Gaia photometry of cluster members and their mean parallax. We obtain
reliable parameters for 1867 clusters. Our new homogeneous catalogue confirms
the relative lack of old clusters in the inner disc (with a few notable
exceptions). We also quantify and discuss the variation of scale height with
cluster age, and detect the Galactic warp in the distribution of old clusters.
This work results in a large and homogenous cluster catalogue. However, the
present sample is still unable to trace the Outer spiral arm of the Milky Way,
which indicates that the outer disc cluster census might still be incomplete.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11142 [pdf] - 2124641
Full 5D characterisation of the Sagittarius stream with Gaia DR2 RR
Lyrae
Submitted: 2020-02-25
The Sagittarius stream is one of the best tools that we currently have to
estimate the mass and shape of our Galaxy. However, assigning membership and
obtaining the phase-space distribution of the stars that form the tails is
quite challenging. Our goal is to produce a catalogue of RR Lyrae stars of
Sagittarius and obtain an empiric measurement of the trends along the stream in
sky position, distance and tangential velocities. We generate two initial
samples from the Gaia DR2 RR Lyrae catalogue: one, selecting only the stars
within \pm20deg of the orbital plane of Sagittarius (Strip) and the other, the
result of applying the Pole Count Map (nGC3) algorithm. We then use the
model-independent, deterministic method developed in this work to remove most
of the contamination by detecting and isolating the stream in distance and
proper motions. The output is two empiric catalogues: the Strip sample
(higher-completeness, lower-purity) which contains 11 677 stars, and the nGC3
sample (higher-purity, lower-completeness) with 6 608 stars. We characterise
the changes along the stream in all the available dimensions, the 5 astrometric
ones plus the metallicity, covering more than 2pi rad in the sky and obtain new
estimates for the apocentres and the mean [Fe/H] of the RR Lyrae population.
Also, we show the first map of the two components of the tangential velocity,
thanks to the combination of distances and proper motions. Finally, we detect
the bifurcation in the leading arm and report no significant difference between
the two branches, either in metallicity, kinematics or distance. We provide the
largest sample of RR Lyrae candidates of Sagittarius, which can be used as an
input for a spectroscopic follow-up or as a reference for the new generation of
models of the stream through the interpolators in distance and velocity that we
have constructed.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.07122 [pdf] - 2057883
Hunting for open clusters in \textit{Gaia} DR2: $582$ new OCs in the
Galactic disc
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Luri, X.;
Cid-Fuentes, J. Álvarez;
Casamiquela, L.;
Anders, F.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Monguió, M.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Solà, S.;
Badia, R. M.
Submitted: 2020-01-20
Open clusters are key targets for both Galaxy structure and evolution and
stellar physics studies. Since \textit{Gaia} DR2 publication, the discovery of
undetected clusters has proven that our samples were not complete. Our aim is
to exploit the Big Data capabilities of machine learning to detect new open
clusters in \textit{Gaia} DR2, and to complete the open cluster sample to
enable further studies on the Galactic disc. We use a machine learning based
methodology to systematically search in the Galactic disc, looking for
overdensities in the astrometric space and identifying them as open clusters
using photometric information. First, we use an unsupervised clustering
algorithm, DBSCAN, to blindly search for these overdensities in \textit{Gaia}
DR2 $(l,b,\varpi,\mu_{\alpha^*},\mu_\delta)$. After that, we use a deep
learning artificial neural network trained on colour-magnitude diagrams to
identify isochrone patterns in these overdensities, and to confirm them as open
clusters. We find $582$ new open clusters distributed along the Galactic disc,
in the region $|b| < 20$. We can detect substructure in complex regions, and
identify the tidal tails of a disrupting cluster UBC~$274$ of $\sim 3$ Gyr
located at $\sim 2$ kpc. Adapting the methodology into a Big Data environment
allows us to target the search driven by physical properties of the open
clusters, instead of being driven by its computational requirements. This blind
search for open clusters in the Galactic disc increases in a $45\%$ the number
of known open clusters.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.07576 [pdf] - 1916776
Gaia kinematics reveal a complex lopsided and twisted Galactic disc warp
Submitted: 2018-12-18, last modified: 2019-06-07
There are few warp kinematic models of the Galaxy able to characterise
structure and kinematics. These models are necessary to study the lopsidedness
of the warp and the twisting of the line-of-nodes of the stellar warp, already
seen in gas and dust. We use the \Gaia~Data Release 2 astrometric data up to
$G=20$mag to characterise the structure of the Galactic warp, the vertical
motions and the dependency on the age. We use two populations up to
galactocentric distances of $16$kpc, a young (OB-type) and an old (Red Giant
Branch, RGB). We use the nGC3 PCM and LonKin methods based on the Gaia
observables, together with 2D projections of the positions and proper motions
in the Galactic plane. We confirm the age dependency of the Galactic warp, both
in positions and kinematics, being the height of the Galactic warp of about
$0.2$kpc for the OB sample and of $1.$kpc for the RGB at a galactocentric
distance of $14$kpc. Both methods find that the onset radius is $12\sim 13$kpc
for the OB sample and $10\sim 11$kpc for the RGB. From the RGB sample, we find
from galactocentric distances larger than $10$kpc the line-of-nodes twists away
from the Sun-anticentre line towards galactic azimuths $\sim 180-200^{\circ}$
increasing with radius, though possibly influenced by extinction. The RGB
sample reveals a slightly lopsided stellar warp with $\sim 250$pc between the
up and down sides. The line of maximum of proper motions in latitude is
systematically offset from the line-of-nodes estimated from the spatial data,
which our models predict as a kinematic signature of lopsidedness. We also show
a prominent wave-like pattern of a bending mode different in the OB and RGB,
and substructures that might not be related to the Galactic warp nor to a
bending mode. GDR2 triggers the need for complex kinematic models, flexible
enough to combine both wave-like patterns and an S-shaped lopsided
warp.[abridged]
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.06161 [pdf] - 1909309
Hunting for open clusters in \textit{Gaia} DR2: the Galactic anticentre
Submitted: 2019-05-15, last modified: 2019-06-05
The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) provided an unprecedented volume of precise
astrometric and excellent photometric data. In terms of data mining the Gaia
catalogue, machine learning methods have shown to be a powerful tool, for
instance in the search for unknown stellar structures. Particularly, supervised
and unsupervised learning methods combined together significantly improves the
detection rate of open clusters. We systematically scan Gaia DR2 in a region
covering the Galactic anticentre and the Perseus arm $(120 \leq l \leq 205$ and
$-10 \leq b \leq 10)$, with the goal of finding any open clusters that may
exist in this region, and fine tuning a previously proposed methodology
successfully applied to TGAS data, adapting it to different density regions.
Our methodology uses an unsupervised, density-based, clustering algorithm,
DBSCAN, that identifies overdensities in the five-dimensional astrometric
parameter space $(l,b,\varpi,\mu_{\alpha^*},\mu_{\delta})$ that may correspond
to physical clusters. The overdensities are separated into physical clusters
(open clusters) or random statistical clusters using an artificial neural
network to recognise the isochrone pattern that open clusters show in a colour
magnitude diagram. The method is able to recover more than 75% of the open
clusters confirmed in the search area. Moreover, we detected 53 open clusters
unknown previous to Gaia DR2, which represents an increase of more than 22%
with respect to the already catalogued clusters in this region. We find that
the census of nearby open clusters is not complete. Different machine learning
methodologies for a blind search of open clusters are complementary to each
other; no single method is able to detect 100% of the existing groups. Our
methodology has shown to be a reliable tool for the automatic detection of open
clusters, designed to be applied to the full Gaia DR2 catalogue.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.05494 [pdf] - 1871416
Gaia DR2 unravels incompleteness of nearby cluster population: New open
clusters in the direction of Perseus
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Sedaghat, N.;
Farahi, A.;
de Souza, R. S.;
Skalidis, R.;
Malz, A. I.;
Macêdo, S.;
Moews, B.;
Jordi, C.;
Moitinho, A.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Ishida, E. E. O.;
Heneka, C.;
Boucaud, A.;
Trindade, A. M. M.
Submitted: 2018-10-12, last modified: 2019-03-21
Open clusters (OCs) are popular tracers of the structure and evolutionary
history of the Galactic disk. The OC population is often considered to be
complete within 1.8 kpc of the Sun. The recent Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) allows
the latter claim to be challenged. We perform a systematic search for new OCs
in the direction of Perseus using precise and accurate astrometry from Gaia
DR2. We implement a coarse-to-fine search method. First, we exploit spatial
proximity using a fast density-aware partitioning of the sky via a k-d tree in
the spatial domain of Galactic coordinates, (l, b). Secondly, we employ a
Gaussian mixture model in the proper motion space to quickly tag fields around
OC candidates. Thirdly, we apply an unsupervised membership assignment method,
UPMASK, to scrutinise the candidates. We visually inspect colour-magnitude
diagrams to validate the detected objects. Finally, we perform a diagnostic to
quantify the significance of each identified overdensity in proper motion and
in parallax space We report the discovery of 41 new stellar clusters. This
represents an increment of at least 20% of the previously known OC population
in this volume of the Milky Way. We also report on the clear identification of
NGC 886, an object previously considered an asterism. This letter challenges
the previous claim of a near-complete sample of open clusters up to 1.8 kpc.
Our results reveal that this claim requires revision, and a complete census of
nearby open clusters is yet to be found.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.01613 [pdf] - 1851538
Open cluster kinematics with Gaia DR2
Soubiran, C.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Antoja, T.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Bossini, D.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Carrera, R.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Heiter, U.;
Katz, D.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Campion, J. -F. Le;
Moitinho, A.;
Sordo, R.
Submitted: 2018-08-05, last modified: 2019-02-28
Context. Open clusters are very good tracers of the evolution of the Galactic
disc. Thanks to Gaia, their kinematics can be investigated with an
unprecedented precision and accuracy. Aims. The distribution of open clusters
in the 6D phase space is revisited with Gaia DR2. Methods. The weighted mean
radial velocity of open clusters was determined, using the most probable
members available from a previous astrometric investigation that also provided
mean parallaxes and proper motions. Those parameters, all derived from Gaia DR2
only, were combined to provide the 6D phase space information of 861 clusters.
The velocity distribution of nearby clusters was investigated, as well as the
spatial and velocity distributions of the whole sample as a function of age. A
high quality subsample was used to investigate some possible pairs and groups
of clusters sharing the same Galactic position and velocity. Results. For the
high quality sample that has 406 clusters, the median uncertainty of the
weighted mean radial velocity is 0.5 km/s. The accuracy, assessed by comparison
to ground-based high resolution spectroscopy, is better than 1 km/s. Open
clusters nicely follow the velocity distribution of field stars in the close
Solar neighbourhood previously revealed by Gaia DR2. As expected, the vertical
distribution of young clusters is very flat but the novelty is the high
precision to which this can be seen. The dispersion of vertical velocities of
young clusters is at the level of 5 km/s. Clusters older than 1 Gyr span
distances to the Galactic plane up to 1 kpc with a vertical velocity dispersion
of 14 km/s, typical of the thin disc. Five pairs of clusters and one group with
five members are possibly physically related. Other binary candidates
previously identified turn out to be chance alignment.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.08726 [pdf] - 1775555
A Gaia DR2 view of the Open Cluster population in the Milky Way
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Soubiran, C.;
Bossini, D.;
Moitinho, A.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Sordo, R.;
Carrera, R.
Submitted: 2018-05-22, last modified: 2018-07-12
Open clusters are convenient probes of the structure and history of the
Galactic disk. They are also fundamental to stellar evolution studies. The
second Gaia data release contains precise astrometry at the sub-milliarcsecond
level and homogeneous photometry at the mmag level, that can be used to
characterise a large number of clusters over the entire sky. In this study we
aim to a establish list of members and derive mean parameters, in particular
distances, for as many clusters as possible, making use of Gaia data alone. We
compile a list of thousands of known or putative clusters from the literature.
We then apply an unsupervised membership assignment code, UPMASK, to the Gaia
DR2 data contained within the fields of those clusters. We obtained a list of
members and cluster parameters for 1229 clusters. As expected, the youngest
clusters are seen to be tightly distributed near the Galactic plane and to
trace the spiral arms of the Milky Way, while older objects are more uniformly
distributed, deviate further from the plane, and tend to be located at larger
Galactocentric distances. Thanks to the quality of GaiaDR2 astrometry, the
fully homogeneous parameters derived in this study are the most precise to
date. Furthermore, we report on the serendipitous discovery of 60 new open
clusters in the fields analysed during this study.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.03045 [pdf] - 1767422
A new method for unveiling Open Clusters in Gaia: new nearby Open
Clusters confirmed by DR2
Submitted: 2018-05-08, last modified: 2018-06-12
The publication of the Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) opens a new era in
Astronomy. It includes precise astrometric data (positions, proper motions and
parallaxes) for more than $1.3$ billion sources, mostly stars. To analyse such
a vast amount of new data, the use of data mining techniques and machine
learning algorithms are mandatory. The search for Open Clusters, groups of
stars that were born and move together, located in the disk, is a great example
for the application of these techniques. Our aim is to develop a method to
automatically explore the data space, requiring minimal manual intervention. We
explore the performance of a density based clustering algorithm, DBSCAN, to
find clusters in the data together with a supervised learning method such as an
Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to automatically distinguish between real Open
Clusters and statistical clusters. The development and implementation of this
method to a $5$-Dimensional space ($l$, $b$, $\varpi$, $\mu_{\alpha^*}$,
$\mu_\delta$) to the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) data, and a
posterior validation using Gaia DR2 data, lead to the proposal of a set of new
nearby Open Clusters. We have developed a method to find OCs in astrometric
data, designed to be applied to the full Gaia DR2 archive.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09376 [pdf] - 1732651
Gaia Data Release 2: using Gaia parallaxes
Luri, X.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Arenou, F.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Prusti, T.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Delgado, H. E.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-06-08
The second Gaia data release (GDR2) provides precise five-parameter
astrometric data (positions, proper motions and parallaxes) for an
unprecedented amount of sources (more than $1.3$ billion, mostly stars). The
use of this wealth of astrometric data comes with a specific challenge: how
does one properly infer from these data the astrophysical parameters of
interest?
The main - but not only - focus of this paper is the issue of the estimation
of distances from parallaxes, possibly combined with other information. We
start with a critical review of the methods traditionally used to obtain
distances from parallaxes and their shortcomings. Then we provide guidelines on
how to use parallaxes more efficiently to estimate distances by using Bayesian
methods. In particular also we show that negative parallaxes, or parallaxes
with relatively larger uncertainties still contain valuable information.
Finally, we provide examples that show more generally how to use astrometric
data for parameter estimation, including the combination of proper motions and
parallaxes and the handling of covariances in the uncertainties.
The paper contains examples based on simulated Gaia data to illustrate the
problems and the solutions proposed. Furthermore, the developments and methods
proposed in the paper are linked to a set of tutorials included in the Gaia
archive documentation that provide practical examples and a good starting point
for the application of the recommendations to actual problems. In all cases the
source code for the analysis methods is provided. Our main recommendation is to
always treat the derivation of (astro-) physical parameters from astrometric
data, in particular when parallaxes are involved, as an inference problem which
should preferably be handled with a full Bayesian approach.