We employ optical and UV observations to present SEDs for two reverberation-mapped samples of super-Eddington and sub-Eddington AGN with similar luminosity distributions. The samples are fitted with accretion disc models in order to look for SED differences that depend on the Eddington ratio. The fitting takes into account measured BH mass and accretion rates, BH spin and intrinsic reddening of the sources. All objects in both groups can be fitted by thin AD models over the range 0.2-1$\,\mu$m with reddening as a free parameter. The intrinsic reddening required to fit the data are relatively small, $E(B-V)\leq0.2$~mag, except for one source. Super-Eddington AGN seem to require more reddening. The distribution of $E(B-V)$ is similar to what is observed in larger AGN samples. The best fit disc models recover very well the BH mass and accretion for the two groups. However, the SEDs are very different, with super-Eddington sources requiring much more luminous far-UV continuum. The exact amount depends on the possible saturation of the UV radiation in slim discs. In particular, we derive for the super-Eddington sources a typical bolometric correction at 5100\AA{} of 60-150 compared with a median of $\sim$20 for the sub-Eddington AGN. The measured torus luminosity relative to $\lambda L_{\lambda}(5100\AA{}$) are similar in both groups. The $\alpha_{OX}$ distribution is similar too. However, we find extremely small torus covering factors for super-Eddington sources, an order of magnitude smaller than those of sub-Eddington AGN. The small differences between the groups regarding the spectral range 0.2-22$\,\mu$m, and the significant differences related to the part of the SED that we cannot observed may be consistent with some slim disc models. An alternative explanation is that present day slim-disc models over-estimate the far UV luminosity of such objects by a large amount.

The Chandra Deep Field is the region of the sky with the highest concentration of X-ray data available: 4Ms of Chandra and 3Ms of XMM data, allowing excellent quality spectra to be extracted even for faint sources. We take advantage of this in order to compile a sample of heavily obscured Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) using X-ray spectroscopy. We select our sample among the 176 brightest XMM sources, searching for either a) flat X-ray spectra (Photon index<1.4 at the 90% confidence level) suggestive of a reflection dominated continuum or b) an absorption turn-over suggestive of a column density higher than ~10^{24} cm-2. We find a sample of nine candidate heavily obscured sources satisfying the above criteria. Four of these show statistically significant FeKalpha lines with large equivalent widths (three out of four have EW consistent with 1 keV) suggesting that these are the most secure Compton-thick AGN candidates. Two of these sources are transmission dominated while the other two are most probably reflection dominated Compton-thick AGN. Although this sample of four sources is by no means statistically complete, it represents the best example of Compton-thick sources found at moderate-to-high redshift with three sources at z=1.2-1.5 and one source at z=3.7. Using Spitzer and Herschel observations, we estimate with good accuracy the X-ray to mid-IR (12 micron) luminosity ratio of our sources. These are well below the average AGN relation, independently suggesting that these four sources are heavily obscured.