At Paranal Observatory, the least predictable parameter affecting the short-term scheduling of astronomical observations is the optical turbulence, especially the seeing, coherence time and ground layer fraction. These are critical variables driving the performance of the instruments of the Very Large Telescope (VLT), especially those fed with adaptive optics systems. Currently, the night astronomer does not have a predictive tool to support him/her in decision-making at night. As most service-mode observations at the VLT last less than two hours, it is critical to be able to predict what will happen in this time frame, to avoid time losses due to sudden changes in the turbulence conditions, and also to enable more aggressive scheduling. We therefore investigate here the possibility to forecast the turbulence conditions over the next two hours. We call this "turbulence nowcasting", analogously with weather nowcasting, a term already used in meteorology coming from the contraction of "now" and "forecasting". We present here the results of a study based on historical data of the Paranal Astronomical Site Monitoring combined with ancillary data, in a machine learning framework. We show the strengths and shortcomings of such an approach, and present some perspectives in the context of the Extremely Large Telescope.

We propose a new sequential classification model for astronomical objects based on a recurrent convolutional neural network (RCNN) which uses sequences of images as inputs. This approach avoids the computation of light curves or difference images. This is the first time that sequences of images are used directly for the classification of variable objects in astronomy. The second contribution of this work is the image simulation process. We generate synthetic image sequences that take into account the instrumental and observing conditions, obtaining a realistic, set of movies for each astronomical object. The simulated dataset is used to train our RCNN classifier. This approach allows us to generate datasets to train and test our RCNN model for different astronomical surveys and telescopes. We aim at building a simulated dataset whose distribution is close enough to the real dataset, so that a fine tuning could match the distributions between real and simulated dataset. To test the RCNN classifier trained with the synthetic dataset, we used real-world data from the High cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) obtaining an average recall of 85%, improved to 94% after performing fine tuning with 10 real samples per class. We compare the results of our model with those of a light curve random forest classifier. The proposed RCNN with fine tuning has a similar performance on the HiTS dataset compared to the light curve classifier, trained on an augmented training set with 10 real samples per class. The RCNN approach presents several advantages in an alert stream classification scenario, such as a reduction of the data pre-processing, faster online evaluation and easier performance improvement using a few real data samples. These results encourage us to use this method for alert brokers systems that will process alert streams generated by new telescopes such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.

In this paper, we propose an enhanced CNN model for detecting supernovae (SNe). This is done by applying a new method for obtaining rotational invariance that exploits cyclic symmetry. In addition, we use a visualization approach, the layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) method, which allows finding the relevant pixels in each image that contribute to discriminate between SN candidates and artifacts. We introduce a measure to assess quantitatively the effect of the rotational invariant methods on the LRP relevance heatmaps. This allows comparing the proposed method, CAP, with the original Deep-HiTS model. The results show that the enhanced method presents an augmented capacity for achieving rotational invariance with respect to the original model. An ensemble of CAP models obtained the best results so far on the HiTS dataset, reaching an average accuracy of 99.53%. The improvement over Deep-HiTS is significant both statistically and in practice.