Normalized to: Carnero-Rosell, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02427 [pdf] - 1775543
Star-galaxy classification in the Dark Energy Survey Y1 dataset
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Hoyle, B.;
Marchã, M. J.;
Soumagnac, M. T.;
Bechtol, K.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Abdalla, F.;
Aleksić, J.;
Avestruz, C.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bonnett, C.;
Brunner, R.;
Carrasco-Kind, M.;
Choi, A.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Kim, E.;
Lahav, O.;
Moraes, B.;
Nord, B.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Santiago, B.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wei, K.;
Wester, W.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T.;
Allam, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Carnero-Rosell, A.;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C.;
da Costa, L.;
Davis, C.;
de Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-05-07, last modified: 2018-10-30
We perform a comparison of different approaches to star-galaxy classification
using the broad-band photometric data from Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey.
This is done by performing a wide range of tests with and without external
`truth' information, which can be ported to other similar datasets. We make a
broad evaluation of the performance of the classifiers in two science cases
with DES data that are most affected by this systematic effect: large-scale
structure and Milky Way studies. In general, even though the default
morphological classifiers used for DES Y1 cosmology studies are sufficient to
maintain a low level of systematic contamination from stellar
mis-classification, contamination can be reduced to the O(1%) level by using
multi-epoch and infrared information from external datasets. For Milky Way
studies the stellar sample can be augmented by ~20% for a given flux limit.
Reference catalogs used in this work will be made available upon publication.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.02432 [pdf] - 1530990
Redshift Measurement and Spectral Classification for eBOSS Galaxies with
the Redmonster Software
Hutchinson, Timothy A.;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Dawson, Kyle S.;
Prieto, Carlos Allende;
Bailey, Stephen;
Bautista, Julian E.;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Conroy, Charlie;
Guy, Julien;
Myers, Adam D.;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Carnero-Rosell, Aurelio;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Vivek, M.;
Zhu, Guangtun Ben
Submitted: 2016-07-08, last modified: 2016-10-11
We describe the redmonster automated redshift measurement and spectral
classification software designed for the extended Baryon Oscillation
Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV). We
describe the algorithms, the template standard and requirements, and the newly
developed galaxy templates to be used on eBOSS spectra. We present results from
testing on early data from eBOSS, where we have found a 90.5% automated
redshift and spectral classification success rate for the luminous red galaxy
sample (redshifts 0.6$\lesssim z \lesssim$1.0). The redmonster performance
meets the eBOSS cosmology requirements for redshift classification and
catastrophic failures, and represents a significant improvement over the
previous pipeline. We describe the empirical processes used to determine the
optimum number of additive polynomial terms in our models and an acceptable
$\Delta\chi_r^2$ threshold for declaring statistical confidence. Statistical
errors on redshift measurement due to photon shot noise are assessed, and we
find typical values of a few tens of km s$^{-1}$. An investigation of redshift
differences in repeat observations scaled by error estimates yields a
distribution with a Gaussian mean and standard deviation of $\mu\sim$0.01 and
$\sigma\sim$0.65, respectively, suggesting the reported statistical redshift
uncertainties are over-estimated by $\sim$54%. We assess the effects of object
magnitude, signal-to-noise ratio, fiber number, and fiber head location on the
pipeline's redshift success rate. Finally, we describe directions of ongoing
development.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00329 [pdf] - 1516249
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Aleksic, J.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brunner, R. J.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Caminha, G. B.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlsen, J.;
Carnero-Rosell, A.;
Carollo, M.;
Carrasco-Kind, M.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Clerkin, L.;
Collett, T.;
Conselice, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Estrada, J.;
Etherington, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fabbri, J.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Rosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Guarnieri, P.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Jouvel, S.;
Kessler, R.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
Maraston, C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Merson, A.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morice-Atkinson, X.;
Naidoo, K.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Palmese, A.;
Papadopoulos, A.;
Peiris, H.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reed, S. L.;
Refregier, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Soumagnac, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Whiteway, L.;
Wilcox, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2016-01-03, last modified: 2016-08-19
This overview article describes the legacy prospect and discovery potential
of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) beyond cosmological studies, illustrating it
with examples from the DES early data. DES is using a wide-field camera (DECam)
on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile to image 5000 sq deg of the sky in five
filters (grizY). By its completion the survey is expected to have generated a
catalogue of 300 million galaxies with photometric redshifts and 100 million
stars. In addition, a time-domain survey search over 27 sq deg is expected to
yield a sample of thousands of Type Ia supernovae and other transients. The
main goals of DES are to characterise dark energy and dark matter, and to test
alternative models of gravity; these goals will be pursued by studying large
scale structure, cluster counts, weak gravitational lensing and Type Ia
supernovae. However, DES also provides a rich data set which allows us to study
many other aspects of astrophysics. In this paper we focus on additional
science with DES, emphasizing areas where the survey makes a difference with
respect to other current surveys. The paper illustrates, using early data (from
`Science Verification', and from the first, second and third seasons of
observations), what DES can tell us about the solar system, the Milky Way,
galaxy evolution, quasars, and other topics. In addition, we show that if the
cosmological model is assumed to be Lambda+ Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) then
important astrophysics can be deduced from the primary DES probes. Highlights
from DES early data include the discovery of 34 Trans Neptunian Objects, 17
dwarf satellites of the Milky Way, one published z > 6 quasar (and more
confirmed) and two published superluminous supernovae (and more confirmed).