Normalized to: Carliles, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.05188 [pdf] - 1958084
A Comparison of Photometric Redshift Techniques for Large Radio Surveys
Norris, Ray P.;
Salvato, M.;
Longo, G.;
Brescia, M.;
Budavari, T.;
Carliles, S.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Farrah, D.;
Geach, J.;
Luken, K.;
Musaeva, A.;
Polsterer, K.;
Riccio, G.;
Seymour, N.;
Smolčić, V.;
Vaccari, M.;
Zinn, P.
Submitted: 2019-02-13
Future radio surveys will generate catalogues of tens of millions of radio
sources, for which redshift estimates will be essential to achieve many of the
science goals. However, spectroscopic data will be available for only a small
fraction of these sources, and in most cases even the optical and infrared
photometry will be of limited quality. Furthermore, radio sources tend to be at
higher redshift than most optical sources and so a significant fraction of
radio sources hosts differ from those for which most photometric redshift
templates are designed. We therefore need to develop new techniques for
estimating the redshifts of radio sources. As a starting point in this process,
we evaluate a number of machine-learning techniques for estimating redshift,
together with a conventional template-fitting technique. We pay special
attention to how the performance is affected by the incompleteness of the
training sample and by sparseness of the parameter space or by limited
availability of ancillary multi-wavelength data. As expected, we find that the
quality of the photometric-redshift degrades as the quality of the photometry
decreases, but that even with the limited quality of photometry available for
all sky-surveys, useful redshift information is available for the majority of
sources, particularly at low redshift. We find that a template-fitting
technique performs best with high-quality and almost complete multi-band
photometry, especially if radio sources that are also X-ray emitting are
treated separately. When we reduced the quality of photometry to match that
available for the EMU all-sky radio survey, the quality of the template-fitting
degraded and became comparable to some of the machine learning methods. Machine
learning techniques currently perform better at low redshift than at high
redshift, because of incompleteness of the currently available training data at
high redshifts.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.5651 [pdf] - 1051764
Effect of Inclination of Galaxies on Photometric Redshift
Submitted: 2011-01-28
The inclination of galaxies induces both reddening and extinction to their
observed spectral energy distribution, which in turn impact the derived
properties of the galaxies. Here we report a significant dependence of the
error in photometric redshift (photo-z) on the inclination of disk galaxies
from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The bias in the photo-z based on the
template-fitting approach increases from -0.015 in face-on to 0.021 in edge-on
galaxies. A Principal Component Analysis on the full sample of photometry
reveals the inclination of the galaxies to be represented by the 2nd mode. The
corresponding eigenspectrum resembles an extinction curve. The isolation of the
inclination effect in a low-order mode demonstrates the significant reddening
induced on the observed colors, leading to the over-estimated photo-z in
galaxies of high inclinations. We present approaches to correct the photo-z and
the other properties of the disk galaxies against the inclination effect.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.0658 [pdf] - 1034086
PHAT: PHoto-z Accuracy Testing
Hildebrandt, H.;
Arnouts, S.;
Capak, P.;
Moustakas, L. A.;
Wolf, C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Assef, R. J.;
Banerji, M.;
Benitez, N.;
Brammer, G. B.;
Budavari, T.;
Carliles, S.;
Coe, D.;
Dahlen, T.;
Feldmann, R.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gillis, B.;
Ilbert, O.;
Kotulla, R.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, I. H.;
Miralles, J. -M.;
Purger, N.;
Schmidt, S.;
Singal, J.
Submitted: 2010-08-03
Here we introduce PHAT, the PHoto-z Accuracy Testing programme, an
international initiative to test and compare different methods of photo-z
estimation. Two different test environments are set up, one (PHAT0) based on
simulations to test the basic functionality of the different photo-z codes, and
another one (PHAT1) based on data from the GOODS survey. The accuracy of the
different methods is expressed and ranked by the global photo-z bias, scatter,
and outlier rates. Most methods agree well on PHAT0 but produce photo-z
scatters that can differ by up to a factor of two even in this idealised case.
A larger spread in accuracy is found for PHAT1. Few methods benefit from the
addition of mid-IR photometry. Remaining biases and systematic effects can be
explained by shortcomings in the different template sets and the use of priors
on the one hand and an insufficient training set on the other hand. Scatters of
4-8% in Delta_z/(1+z) were obtained, consistent with other studies. However,
somewhat larger outlier rates (>7.5% with Delta_z/(1+z)>0.15; >4.5% after
cleaning) are found for all codes. There is a general trend that empirical
codes produce smaller biases than template-based codes. The systematic,
quantitative comparison of different photo-z codes presented here is a snapshot
of the current state-of-the-art of photo-z estimation and sets a standard for
the assessment of photo-z accuracy in the future. The rather large outlier
rates reported here for PHAT1 on real data should be investigated further since
they are most probably also present (and possibly hidden) in many other
studies. The test data sets are publicly available and can be used to compare
new methods to established ones and help in guiding future photo-z method
development. (abridged)
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.2477 [pdf] - 7100
Photometric Redshift Estimation on SDSS Data Using Random Forests
Submitted: 2007-11-15
Given multiband photometric data from the SDSS DR6, we estimate galaxy
redshifts. We employ a Random Forest trained on color features and
spectroscopic redshifts from 80,000 randomly chosen primary galaxies yielding a
mapping from color to redshift such that the difference between the estimate
and the spectroscopic redshift is small. Our methodology results in tight RMS
scatter in the estimates limited by photometric errors. Additionally, this
approach yields an error distribution that is nearly Gaussian with parameter
estimates giving reliable confidence intervals unique to each galaxy
photometric redshift.