Normalized to: Campitiello, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00986 [pdf] - 2108908
Estimating black hole masses: Accretion disk fitting versus
reverberation mapping and single epoch
Submitted: 2019-07-01, last modified: 2020-06-05
We selected a sample of 28 Type 1 AGNs for which a black hole mass has been
inferred using the reverberation mapping technique and single epoch scaling
relations. All 28 sources show clear evidence of the "Big Blue Bump" in the
optical-UV band whose emission is produced by an accretion disk (AD) around a
supermassive black hole. We fitted the spectrum of these sources with the
relativistic thin AD model KERRBB in order to infer the black hole masses and
compared them with those from Reverberation mapping and Single epoch methods,
discussing the possible uncertainties linked to such a model by quantifying
their weight on our results. We find that for the majority of the sources,
KERRBB is a good description of the AD emission for a wide wavelength range.
The overall uncertainty on the black hole mass estimated through the disk
fitting procedure is $\sim 0.45$ dex (which includes the uncertainty on fitting
parameters such as e.g. spin and viewing angle), comparable to the systematic
uncertainty of reverberation mapping and single epoch methods; however, such an
uncertainty can be $\leq 0.3$ dex if one of the parameters of the fit is well
constrained. Although all of the estimates are affected by large uncertainties,
the masses inferred using the three methods are compatible if the dimensionless
scale factor $f$ (linked to the unknown kinematics and geometry of the Broad
Line Region) is assumed to be larger than one. For the majority of the sources,
the comparison between the results coming from the three methods favors small
spin values. To check the goodness of the KERRBB results, we compared them with
those inferred with other models, such as AGNSED, a model that also accounts
for the emission originating from an X-ray corona: using two sources with a
good data coverage in the X band, we find that the masses estimated with the
two models differ at most by a factor of $\sim 0.2$ dex.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.02955 [pdf] - 1912912
A NuSTAR view of powerful gamma-ray loud blazars
Submitted: 2019-06-07
We observed with the NuSTAR satellite 3 blazars at z>2, detected in
gamma-rays by Fermi/LAT and in the soft X-rays, but not yet observed above 10
keV. The flux and slope of their X-ray continuum, together with Fermi/LAT data
allows us to estimate their total electromagnetic output and peak frequency.
For some of them we can study the source in different states, and investigate
the main cause of the observed different spectral energy distribution. We then
collected all blazars at redshift greater than 2 observed by NuSTAR, and
confirm that these hard and luminous X-ray blazars are among the most powerful
persistent sources in the Universe. We confirm the relation between the jet
power and the disk luminosity, extending it at the high energy end.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.00010 [pdf] - 1882430
Black hole mass and spin estimates of the most distant quasars
Submitted: 2018-08-31, last modified: 2019-03-08
We investigate the properties of the most distant quasars
ULASJ134208.10+092838.61 ($z = 7.54$), ULASJ112001.48+064124.3 ($z = 7.08$) and
DELSJ003836.10-152723.6 ($z = 7.02$) studying their Optical-UV emission that
shows clear evidence of the presence of an accretion disk. We model such
emission applying the relativistic disk models KERRBB and SLIMBH for which we
have derived some analytical approximations to describe the observed emission
as a function of the black hole mass, accretion rate, spin and the viewing
angle. We found that: 1] our black hole mass estimates are compatible with the
ones found using the virial argument but with a smaller uncertainty; 2]
assuming that the virial argument is a reliable method to have a black hole
mass measurement (with no systematic uncertainties involved), we found an upper
limit for the black hole spin of the three sources: very high spin values are
ruled out; 3] our Eddington ratio estimates are smaller than those found in
previous studies by a factor $\sim 2$: all sources are found to be
sub-Eddington. Using our results, we explore the parameter space (efficiency,
accretion rate) to describe the possible evolution of the black hole assuming a
$\sim 10^{2-4} M_{\odot}$ seed: if the black hole in these sources formed at
redshift $z = 10 - 20$, we found that the accretion has to proceed at the
Eddington rate with a radiative efficiency $\eta \sim 0.1$ in order to reach
the observed masses in less than $\sim 0.7$ Gyr.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.00011 [pdf] - 1674689
How to constrain mass and spin of supermassive black holes through their
disk emission
Submitted: 2017-01-31, last modified: 2017-11-27
We investigate the global properties of the radiation emitted by the
accretion disk around Kerr black holes. Using the Kerr blackbody (KERRBB)
numerical model, we build an analytic approximation of the disk emission
features focusing on the pattern of the produced radiation as a function of the
black hole spin, mass, accretion rate and viewing angle. The assumption of
having a geometrically thin disk limits our analysis to systems emitting below
~0.3 of the Eddington luminosity. We apply this analytical model to four
blazars (whose jets are pointing at us) at high redshift that show clear
signatures of disk emission. For them, we derive the black hole masses as a
function of spin. If these jetted sources are powered by the black hole
rotation, they must have high spin values, further constraining their masses.