Normalized to: Calvez, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.1113 [pdf] - 494888
On the use of X-ray and gamma-ray telescopes for identifying the origin
of electrons and positrons observed by ATIC, Fermi, and PAMELA
Submitted: 2010-03-04, last modified: 2011-08-08
X-ray and gamma-ray observations can help understand the origin of the
electron and positron signals reported by ATIC, PAMELA, PPB-BETS, and Fermi. It
remains unclear whether the observed high-energy electrons and positrons are
produced by relic particles, or by some astrophysical sources. To distinguish
between the two possibilities, one can compare the electron population in the
local neighborhood with that in the dwarf spheroidal galaxies, which are not
expected to host as many pulsars and other astrophysical sources. This can be
accomplished using X-ray and gamma-ray observations of dwarf spheroidal
galaxies. Assuming the signal detected by Fermi and ATIC comes from dark matter
and using the inferred dark matter profile of the Draco dwarf spheroidal galaxy
as an example, we calculate the photon spectrum produced by electrons via
inverse Compton scattering. Since little is known about the magnetic fields in
dwarf spheroidal galaxies, we consider the propagation of charged particles
with and without diffusion. Extending the analysis of Fermi collaboration for
Draco, we find that for a halo mass ~ 1 billion Solar masses, even in the
absence of diffusion, the gamma-ray signal would be above the upper limits.
This conclusion is subject to uncertainties associated with the halo mass. If
dwarf spheroidal galaxies host local magnetic fields, the diffusion of the
electrons can result in a signal detectable by future X-ray telescopes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0045 [pdf] - 902973
Can past gamma-ray bursts explain both INTEGRAL and ATIC/PAMELA/Fermi
anomalies simultaneously?
Submitted: 2010-02-26, last modified: 2010-08-23
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been invoked to explain both the 511 keV
emission from the galactic bulge and the high-energy positron excess inferred
from the ATIC, PAMELA, and Fermi data. While independent explanations can be
responsible for these phenomena, we explore the possibility of their common
GRB-related origin by modeling the GRB distribution and estimating the rates.
For an expected Milky Way long GRB rate, neither of the two signals is generic;
the local excess requires a 2% coincidence, while the signal from the galactic
center requires a 20% coincidence with respect to the timing of the latest GRB.
The simultaneous explanation requires a 0.4% coincidence. Considering the large
number of statistical "trials" created by multiple searches for new physics,
the coincidences of a few per cent cannot be dismissed as unlikely.
Alternatively, both phenomena can be explained by GRBs if the galactic rate is
higher than expected. We also show that a similar result is difficult to obtain
assuming a simplified short GRB distribution.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.2535 [pdf] - 951413
Role of Galactic sources and magnetic fields in forming the observed
energy-dependent composition of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays
Submitted: 2010-04-14, last modified: 2010-08-18
Recent results from Pierre Auger Observatory, showing energy dependent
chemical composition of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) with a growing
fraction of heavy elements at high energies, suggest a possible non-negligible
contribution of the Galactic sources. We show that, in the case of UHECRs
produced by gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) or rare types of supernova explosions that
took place in Milky Way in the past, the change in UHECR composition can result
from the difference in diffusion times for different species. The anisotropy in
the direction of the Galactic Center is expected to be a few per cent on
average, but the locations of the most recent/closest bursts can be associated
with observed clusters of UHECRs.