A significant gender disparity is widely known to occur within the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Women are both under-represented in their participation in Australian STEM education (compared to their fraction within the population at large), and face a much higher attrition rate from STEM subjects throughout secondary and tertiary education. Even within STEM careers the proportion of women frequently generally decreases with increasing position of seniority. In 2015 organisers and members of the Australian Space Research Community began to analyse the data from participants of the Australian Space Research Conference, in order to derive statistics relating to the gender balance of the conference. In this paper, the data from the most recent conference (held on the Gold Coast, in September 2018) is analysed, considering the gender demographics of delegates, presenters (within numerous categories), and awards. This year, we also present the dimensions of career type and academic level of conference attendees. The resulting trends are compared to those of other national space research conferences - the Scientific Meeting of the Astronomical Society of Australia. The results show that the representation of females dropped to the lowest levels since formal data collection began in 2015, with females comprising 23% of conference attendees, and 21% of all session presentations (posters and talks combined). Gender parity was achieved however amongst the invited Plenary presentations. Recommendations for removing some of the barriers to female participation in the conference and encouraging greater gender balance and diversity in future are discussed.

In recent years, there has been significant debate and discussion about the glaring gender disparity in the physical sciences. To better understand and address this within the Australian Space Research Community, in 2015 we began the process of keeping a record of the gender balance at the annual Australian Space Research Conference. In addition, we began holding an annual 'Women in Space Research' lunch at that meeting, to discuss the situation, and search for routes by which issues of equity can be addressed, and the situation improved. We present an update based on the 16th Australian Space Research Conference, held at RMIT, Melbourne, in September 2016. As in 2015, male attendees outnumbered female attendees approximately 3:1. However, there was a small shift (~2.3%) in the balance, with female delegates now making up 26.4% of the total, up from 24.1% in 2015. This shift was mirrored in the gender distribution of talks, with 28.9% of all oral presentations being given by women (up from 25.2%). More striking, however, were the changes in the distribution of plenary presentations (44.4% female, up from 22.2%), poster presentations (31.8% female, up from 7.7%), and student awards (33.3% female, up from 12.5%). These changes are encouraging, and will hopefully continue in years to come. The conference organising committee again mirrored the gender balance of the delegates as a whole (27.3 % female vs. 26.4% of delegates), though the program committee was markedly more male-dominated this year than last (82.4% male, against last year's 72.2%). At this year's 'Women in Space Research' lunchtime event, a number of suggestions were made that could help to make future conferences, and the wider community, a more equitable place... --- abstract abridged ---

In recent years, the striking gender imbalance in the physical sciences has been a topic for much debate. National bodies and professional societies in the astronomical and space sciences are now taking active steps to understand and address this imbalance. In order to begin this process in the Australian Space Research community, we must first understand the current state of play. In this work, we therefore present a short 'snapshot' of the current gender balance in our community, as observed at the 15th Australian Space Research Conference. We find that, at this year's conference, male attendees outnumbered female attendees by a ratio of 3:1 (24% female). This gender balance was repeated in the distribution of conference talks and plenary presentations (25 and 22% female, respectively). Of the thirteen posters presented at the conference, twelve were presented by men (92%), a pattern repeated in the awards for the best student presentations (seven male recipients vs one female). The program and organising committees for the meeting fairly represented the gender balance of the conference attendees (28% and 30% female, respectively). These figures provide a baseline for monitoring future progress in increasing the participation of women in the field. They also suggest that the real barrier is not speaking, but in enabling conference attendance and retaining female scientists through their careers - in other words, addressing and repairing the 'leaky pipeline'.