Normalized to: Buzzi, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.3309 [pdf] - 1123402
The Scale of Cosmic Isotropy
Submitted: 2012-05-15, last modified: 2012-10-08
The most fundamental premise to the standard model of the universe, the
Cosmological Principle (CP), states that the large-scale properties of the
universe are the same in all directions and at all comoving positions.
Demonstrating this theoretical hypothesis has proven to be a formidable
challenge. The cross-over scale R_{iso} above which the galaxy distribution
becomes statistically isotropic is vaguely defined and poorly (if not at all)
quantified. Here we report on a formalism that allows us to provide an
unambiguous operational definition and an estimate of R_{iso}. We apply the
method to galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 7,
finding that R_{iso}\sim 150h^{-1} Mpc. Besides providing a consistency test of
the Copernican principle, this result is in agreement with predictions based on
numerical simulations of the spatial distribution of galaxies in cold dark
matter dominated cosmological models.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0806.3768 [pdf] - 13822
A Null Test of the Metric Nature of the Cosmic Acceleration
Submitted: 2008-06-23, last modified: 2008-11-14
We discuss the testable predictions of a phenomenological model in which the
accelerated expansion of the universe is the result of the action of a
non-gravitational force field, rather than the effect of a negative-pressure
dark-energy fluid or a modification of general relativity. We show, through the
equivalence principle, that in such a scenario the cosmic acceleration felt by
distant standard candles like SNIa depends on the mass of the host system,
being larger in galaxies than in rich clusters. As a consequence, the scatter
in the observed SNIa Hubble diagram has mostly a physical origin in this
scenario: in fact, the SNIa distance modulus is increasing, at fixed redshift,
for SNe that are hosted in isolated galaxies with respect to the case of SNe
hosted in rich galaxy clusters. Due to its strong dependence on the
astrophysical environments of standard candles, we conclude that alternative
non-gravitational mechanisms for the observed accelerated expansion of the
universe can be interestingly contrasted against the standard metric
interpretation of the cosmological acceleration by means of an environmental
analysis of the cosmic structures in which SNIa are found. The possible absence
of such environmental effects would definitely exclude non-gravitational
mechanisms as responsible for the accelerated cosmological expansion and will
therefore reinforce a metric interpretation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0811.2358 [pdf] - 18541
Testing gravity on large scales. The skewness of the galaxy distribution
at z~1
Marinoni, C.;
Guzzo, L.;
Cappi, A.;
Fevre, O. Le;
Mazure, A.;
Meneux, B.;
Pollo, A.;
Iovino, A.;
McCracken, H. J.;
Scaramella, R.;
de la Torre, S.;
Virey, J. M.;
Bottini, D.;
Garilli, B.;
Brun, V. Le;
Maccagni, D.;
Picat, J. P.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Tresse, L.;
Vettolani, G.;
Zanichelli, A.;
Adami, C.;
Arnouts, S.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Charlot, S.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Contini, T.;
Foucaud, S.;
Franzetti, P.;
Gavignaud, I.;
Ilbert, O.;
Lamareille, F.;
Marano, B.;
Mathez, G.;
Merighi, R.;
Paltani, S.;
Pellò, R.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Radovich, M.;
Vergani, D.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zucca, E.;
Abbas, U.;
Bondi, M.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Buzzi, A.;
Cucciati, O.;
de Ravel, L.;
Gregorini, L.;
Mellier, Y.;
Merluzzi, P.;
Perez-Montero, E.;
Taxil, P.;
Temporin, S.;
Walcher, C. J.
Submitted: 2008-11-14
We study the evolution of the low-order moments of the galaxy overdensity
distribution over the redshift interval 0.7<z<1.5. We find that the variance
and the normalized skewness evolve over this redshift interval in a way that is
remarkably consistent with predictions of first- and second-order perturbation
theory. This finding confirms the standard gravitational instability paradigm
over nearly 9 Gyrs of cosmic time and demonstrates the importance of accounting
for the non-linear component of galaxy biasing to avoid disagreement between
theory and observations.