Normalized to: Brugaletta, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.04450 [pdf] - 979037
Gaia-ESO Survey: The analysis of pre-main sequence stellar spectra
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Frasca, A.;
Damiani, F.;
Franciosini, E.;
Cottaar, M.;
Sousa, S. G.;
Tabernero, H. M.;
Klutsch, A.;
Spina, L.;
Biazzo, K.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Sacco, G. G.;
Randich, S.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Mena, E. Delgado;
Adibekyan, V.;
Montes, D.;
Bonito, R.;
Gameiro, J. F.;
Alcalá, J. M.;
Hernández, J. I. González;
Jeffries, R.;
Messina, S.;
Meyer, M.;
Gilmore, G.;
Asplund, M.;
Binney, J.;
Bonifacio, P.;
Drew, J. E.;
Feltzing, S.;
Ferguson, A. M. N.;
Micela, G.;
Negueruela, I.;
Prusti, T.;
Rix, H-W.;
Vallenari, A.;
Alfaro, E. J.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bensby, T.;
Blomme, R.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Flaccomio, E.;
Francois, P.;
Hambly, N.;
Irwin, M.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Korn, A. J.;
Smiljanic, R.;
Van Eck, S.;
Walton, N.;
Bayo, A.;
Bergemann, M.;
Carraro, G.;
Costado, M. T.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Heiter, U.;
Hill, V.;
Hourihane, A.;
Jackson, R. J.;
Jofré, P.;
Lardo, C.;
Lewis, J.;
Lind, K.;
Magrini, L.;
Marconi, G.;
Martayan, C.;
Masseron, T.;
Monaco, L.;
Morbidelli, L.;
Sbordone, L.;
Worley, C. C.;
Zaggia, S.
Submitted: 2015-01-19
This paper describes the analysis of UVES and GIRAFFE spectra acquired by the
Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey in the fields of young clusters whose
population includes pre-main sequence (PMS) stars. Both methods that have been
extensively used in the past and new ones developed in the contest of the
Gaia-ESO survey enterprise are available and used. The internal precision of
these quantities is estimated by inter-comparing the results obtained by such
different methods, while the accuracy is estimated by comparison with
independent external data, like effective temperature and surface gravity
derived from angular diameter measurements, on a sample of benchmarks stars.
Specific strategies are implemented to deal with fast rotation, accretion
signatures, chromospheric activity, and veiling. The analysis carried out on
spectra acquired in young clusters' fields during the first 18 months of
observations, up to June 2013, is presented in preparation of the first release
of advanced data products. Stellar parameters obtained with the higher
resolution and larger wavelength coverage from UVES are reproduced with
comparable accuracy and precision using the smaller wavelength range and lower
resolution of the GIRAFFE setup adopted for young stars, which allows us to
provide with confidence stellar parameters for the much larger GIRAFFE sample.
Precisions are estimated to be $\approx$ 120 K r.m.s. in Teff, $\approx$0.3 dex
r.m.s. in logg, and $\approx$0.15 dex r.m.s. in [Fe/H], for both the UVES and
GIRAFFE setups.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.4153 [pdf] - 933043
The Gaia-ESO Survey: Chromospheric Emission, Accretion Properties, and
Rotation in $\gamma$ Velorum and Chamaeleon I
Frasca, A.;
Biazzo, K.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Alcalá, J. M.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Klutsch, A.;
Stelzer, B.;
Sacco, G. G.;
Spina, L.;
Jeffries, R. D.;
Montes, D.;
Alfaro, E. J.;
Barentsen, G.;
Bonito, R.;
Gameiro, J. F.;
Lopez-Santiago, J.;
Pace, G.;
Pasquini, L.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Sousa, S. G.;
Gilmore, G.;
Randich, S.;
Micela, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Flaccomio, E.;
Bayo, A.;
Costado, M. T.;
Franciosini, E.;
Hill, V.;
Hourihane, A.;
Jofre', P.;
Lardo, C.;
Maiorca, E.;
Masseron, T.;
Morbidelli, L.;
Worley, C. C.
Submitted: 2014-12-12
We use the fundamental parameters delivered by the GES consortium in the
first internal data release to select the members of $\gamma$ Vel and Cha I
among the UVES and GIRAFFE spectroscopic observations. A total of 140 $\gamma$
Vel members and 74 Cha I members were studied. We calculated stellar
luminosities through spectral energy distributions, while stellar masses were
derived by comparison with evolutionary tracks. The spectral subtraction of
low-activity and slowly rotating templates, which are rotationally broadened to
match the $v\sin i$ of the targets, enabled us to measure the equivalent widths
(EWs) and the fluxes in the H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ lines. The H$\alpha$ line
was also used for identifying accreting objects and for evaluating the mass
accretion rate ($\dot M_{\rm acc}$). The distribution of $v\sin i$ for the
members of $\gamma$ Vel displays a peak at about 10 km s$^{-1}$ with a tail
toward faster rotators. There is also some indication of a different $v\sin i$
distribution for the members of its two kinematical populations. Only a handful
of stars in $\gamma$ Vel display signatures of accretion, while many more
accretors were detected in the younger Cha~I. Accreting and active stars occupy
two different regions in a $T_{\rm eff}$-flux diagram and we propose a
criterion for distinguishing them. We derive $\dot M_{\rm acc}$ in the ranges
$10^{-11}$-$10^{-9} M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ and $10^{-10}$-$10^{-7} M_\odot$yr$^{-1}$
for $\gamma$ Vel and Cha I accretors, respectively. We find less scatter in the
$\dot M_{\rm acc}-M_\star$ relation derived through the H$\alpha$ EWs, when
compared to the H$\alpha$ $10\%W$ diagnostics, in agreement with other authors.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.4979 [pdf] - 820751
The Gaia-ESO Survey: Kinematic structure in the Gamma Velorum Cluster
Jeffries, R. D.;
Jackson, R. J.;
Cottaar, M.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Meyer, M. R.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Randich, S.;
Sacco, G. G.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Caramazza, M.;
Damiani, F.;
Franciosini, E.;
Frasca, A.;
Gilmore, G.;
Feltzing, S.;
Micela, G.;
Alfaro, E.;
Bensby, T.;
Pancino, E.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
de Laverny, P.;
Lewis, J.;
Magrini, L.;
Morbidelli, L.;
Costado, M. T.;
Jofre, P.;
Klutsch, A.;
Lind, K.;
Maiorca, E.
Submitted: 2014-01-20
Context: A key science goal of the Gaia-ESO survey (GES) is to use the
kinematics of low-mass stars in young clusters to probe their dynamical
histories and how they populate the field as they become unbound. The
clustering of low-mass stars around the massive W-R binary gamma^2 Velorum was
one of the first GES targets. Aims: To empirically determine the radial
velocity (RV) precision of GES data, construct a kinematically unbiased sample
of cluster members and characterise their dynamical state. Methods: Targets
were selected from colour-magnitude diagrams and intermediate resolution
spectroscopy used to derive RVs and assess membership from the strength of the
Li6708A line. The RV distribution was analysed using a maximum likelihood
technique that accounts for unresolved binaries. Results: The GES RV precision
is about 0.25km/s and sufficient to resolve velocity structure in the low-mass
population around gamma^2 Vel. The structure is well fitted by two kinematic
components with roughly equal numbers of stars; the first has an intrinsic
dispersion of 0.34+/-0.16km/s, consistent with virial equilibrium. The second
has a broader dispersion of 1.60+/-0.37km/s and is offset from the first by
~2km/s. The first population is older by 1-2Myr based on a greater level of Li
depletion seen among its M-stars and is probably more centrally concentrated
around gamma^2 Vel. Conclusions: We consider several formation scenarios,
concluding that the two kinematic components are a bound remnant of the
original, denser cluster that formed gamma^2 Vel, and a dispersed population
from the wider Vela OB2 association, of which gamma^2 Vel is the most massive
member. The apparent youth of gamma^2 Vel compared to the older (>=10Myr)
low-mass population surrounding it suggests a scenario where the massive binary
formed in a clustered environment after the formation of the bulk of the
low-mass stars.[abridged]
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.3333 [pdf] - 1052144
The debris disk host star HD 61005: a member of the Argus Association?
Submitted: 2011-02-16
HD 61005 is a nearby young solar type star that shows a large infrared excess
due to a debris disk. The disk has been recently imaged from ground and space,
with indications of several components. Some characteristics of the disk
suggest the presence of planetary companions around the star, that remain
undetected in deep adaptive optics imaging. For a better understanding of the
system we aim to refine the determination of the stellar parameters, with
emphasis on the stellar age and system orientation. We used ASAS and Hipparcos
photometry and FEROS spectra to determine the rotation period, radial and
rotational velocity, chromospheric emission, effective temperature, and
chemical composition. We find no indication of any misalignment between the
star rotation axis and the disk. The standard age calibrations applied to
several indicators yield an age close to that of the Pleiades (120 Myr);
however the kinematic properties strongly support its membership in the younger
(40 Myr) Argus association, which also includes the IC 2391 open cluster.
Detailed comparison of the properties of HD 61005 and IC 2391 members shows
that the characteristics of HD 61005 are compatible with membership to the
Argus association, once its rather slow rotation is taken into account, because
lithium and other age indicators are somewhat correlated with stellar rotation
at a fixed age. We also identify systematic differences between the field and
cluster population of the Argus association, which are probably selection
effects, so we suggest that additional members with slower rotation and lower
activity level are waiting to be identified.