Normalized to: Brower, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.09303 [pdf] - 1391884
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Habib, Salman;
Roser, Robert;
Gerber, Richard;
Antypas, Katie;
Riley, Katherine;
Williams, Tim;
Wells, Jack;
Straatsma, Tjerk;
Almgren, A.;
Amundson, J.;
Bailey, S.;
Bard, D.;
Bloom, K.;
Bockelman, B.;
Borgland, A.;
Borrill, J.;
Boughezal, R.;
Brower, R.;
Cowan, B.;
Finkel, H.;
Frontiere, N.;
Fuess, S.;
Ge, L.;
Gnedin, N.;
Gottlieb, S.;
Gutsche, O.;
Han, T.;
Heitmann, K.;
Hoeche, S.;
Ko, K.;
Kononenko, O.;
LeCompte, T.;
Li, Z.;
Lukic, Z.;
Mori, W.;
Nugent, P.;
Ng, C. -K.;
Oleynik, G.;
O'Shea, B.;
Padmanabhan, N.;
Petravick, D.;
Petriello, F. J.;
Power, J.;
Qiang, J.;
Reina, L.;
Rizzo, T. J.;
Ryne, R.;
Schram, M.;
Spentzouris, P.;
Toussaint, D.;
Vay, J. -L.;
Viren, B.;
Wurthwein, F.;
Xiao, L.
Submitted: 2016-03-30, last modified: 2016-03-31
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and
recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting
held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more
capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals
in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of
the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in
some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data
produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities
and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new
techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes
from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and
analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured
leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling
scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC
simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP
experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate
interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be
required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the
experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to
ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC
resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by
collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition
codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR
facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and
using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on
next-generation systems.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.1693 [pdf] - 695045
Lattice calculation of composite dark matter form factors
Appelquist, T.;
Brower, R. C.;
Buchoff, M. I.;
Cheng, M.;
Cohen, S. D.;
Fleming, G. T.;
Kiskis, J.;
Lin, M. F.;
Neil, E. T.;
Osborn, J. C.;
Rebbi, C.;
Schaich, D.;
Schroeder, C.;
Syritsyn, S. N.;
Voronov, G.;
Vranas, P.;
Wasem, J.
Submitted: 2013-01-08, last modified: 2013-07-18
Composite dark matter candidates, which can arise from new strongly-coupled
sectors, are well-motivated and phenomenologically interesting, particularly in
the context of asymmetric generation of the relic density. In this work, we
employ lattice calculations to study the electromagnetic form factors of
electroweak-neutral dark-matter baryons for a three-color, QCD-like theory with
Nf = 2 and 6 degenerate fermions in the fundamental representation. We
calculate the (connected) charge radius and anomalous magnetic moment, both of
which can play a significant role for direct detection of composite dark
matter. We find minimal Nf dependence in these quantities. We generate
mass-dependent cross-sections for dark matter-nucleon interactions and use them
in conjunction with experimental results from XENON100, excluding dark matter
candidates of this type with masses below 10 TeV.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1002.3527 [pdf] - 316024
13th International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering
(Blois Workshop) - Moving Forward into the LHC Era
Deile, Mario;
d'Enterria, David;
De Roeck, Albert;
Albrow, M. G.;
Alkin, A.;
Avsar, E.;
Bednyakov, V. A.;
Brower, R.;
Bunyatyan, A.;
Burkhardt, H.;
Caldwell, A.;
Carvalho, W.;
Chaichian, M.;
Chapon, E.;
del Valle, Z. Conesa;
Cudell, J. R.;
Dainton, J.;
Deak, M.;
Djuric, M.;
Eggert, K.;
Eidelman, S.;
Ellis, J.;
Ferreira, E.;
Forshaw, J.;
Giani, S.;
Gotsman, E.;
Goulianos, K.;
de Cassagnac, R. Granier;
Grafstrom, P.;
Grebenyuk, A.;
Grube, B.;
Hautmann, F.;
Heinemeyer, S.;
Heller, M.;
Hoerandel, J.;
Hollar, J.;
Hoyer, P.;
Huitu, K.;
Hwang, D. S.;
Islam, M. M.;
Jenkovszky, L. L.;
Jung, H.;
Juranek, V.;
Kaidalov, A.;
Kaspar, J.;
Keates, J.;
Kepka, O.;
Khein, L.;
Khoze, V. A.;
Kodama, T.;
Kohara, A. K.;
Kowalski, H.;
Kundrat, V.;
Kutak, K.;
Lappi, T.;
Lipatov, L.;
Lokajicek, M.;
Lokhtin, I. P.;
Luddy, R. J.;
Lykasov, G. I.;
Lyuboshitz, V. V.;
Lyuboshitz, V. L.;
Lyubushkin, V. V.;
Lyubushkina, T. V.;
Managadze, A. K.;
Maor, U.;
Marage, P.;
Martin, A.;
Martynov, E.;
Marzani, S.;
Mesropian, C.;
Newman, P.;
Niewiadomski, G.;
Pasechnik, R. S.;
Lipatov, L.;
Pauk, V.;
Petrov, V.;
Pierog, T.;
Pilkington, A. D.;
Pinfold, J.;
Poghosyan, M.;
Prokudin, A. V.;
Proskuryakov, A.;
Rojo, J.;
Romanets, E.;
Ross, D. A.;
Royon, C.;
Ruggiero, G.;
Ryskin, M. G.;
Safarik, K.;
Sarycheva, L. I.;
Schicker, R.;
Schwennsen, F.;
Selyugin, O. V.;
Snigirev, A. M.;
Soffer, J.;
Stanev, T;
Strikman, M.;
Szczurek, A.;
Tan, C. -. I;
Tasevsky, M.;
Teryaev, O. V.;
Tricomi, A.;
Troshin, S. M.;
Tyurin, N. E.;
Watt, G.;
Weiglein, G.;
Werner, K.;
Yaschenko, S.
Submitted: 2010-02-17, last modified: 2011-02-08
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive
Scattering (Blois Workshop) - Moving Forward into the LHC Era