Normalized to: Bridle, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.10162 [pdf] - 2117715
$\mu_{\star}$ Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Palmese, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
McClintock, T.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Burgad, J.;
Annis, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Lin, H.;
Choi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Esteves, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Roodman, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
Shin, T.;
von der Linden, A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2020-06-17
We present the weak lensing mass calibration of the stellar mass based
$\mu_{\star}$ mass proxy for redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1. For the first time we are able to perform a calibration of
$\mu_{\star}$ at high redshifts, $z>0.33$. In a blinded analysis, we use $\sim
6,000$ clusters split into 12 subsets spanning the ranges $0.1 \leqslant
z<0.65$ and $\mu_{\star}$ up to $\sim 5.5 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}$, and infer
the average masses of these subsets through modelling of their stacked weak
lensing signal. In our model we account for the following sources of systematic
uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors, miscentring,
cluster-member contamination of the source sample, deviations from the NFW halo
profile, halo triaxiality and projection effects. We use the inferred masses to
estimate the joint mass--$\mu_{\star}$--$z$ scaling relation given by $\langle
M_{200c} | \mu_{\star},z \rangle = M_0 (\mu_{\star}/5.16\times 10^{12}
\mathrm{M_{\odot}})^{F_{\mu_{\star}}} ((1+z)/1.35)^{G_z}$. We find $M_0= (1.14
\pm 0.07) \times 10^{14} \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ with $F_{\mu_{\star}}= 0.76 \pm
0.06$ and $G_z= -1.14 \pm 0.37$. We discuss the use of $\mu_{\star}$ as a
complementary mass proxy to the well-studied richness $\lambda$ for: $i)$
exploring the regimes of low $z$, $\lambda<20$ and high $\lambda$, $z \sim 1$;
$ii)$ testing systematics such as projection effects for applications in
cluster cosmology.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10454 [pdf] - 2129267
The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of
redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
Hartley, W. G.;
Chang, C.;
Samani, S.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Asorey, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Kuehn, K.;
King, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
DeRose, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchon, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-03-23
Obtaining accurate distributions of galaxy redshifts is a critical aspect of
weak lensing cosmology experiments. One of the methods used to estimate and
validate redshift distributions is apply weights to a spectroscopic sample so
that their weighted photometry distribution matches the target sample. In this
work we estimate the \textit{selection bias} in redshift that is introduced in
this procedure. We do so by simulating the process of assembling a
spectroscopic sample (including observer-assigned confidence flags) and
highlight the impacts of spectroscopic target selection and redshift failures.
We use the first year (Y1) weak lensing analysis in DES as an example data set
but the implications generalise to all similar weak lensing surveys. We find
that using colour cuts that are not available to the weak lensing galaxies can
introduce biases of $\Delta~z\sim0.015$ in the weighted mean redshift of
different redshift intervals. To assess the impact of incompleteness in
spectroscopic samples, we select only objects with high observer-defined
confidence flags and compare the weighted mean redshift with the true mean. We
find that the mean redshift of the DES Y1 weak lensing sample is typically
biased at the $\Delta~z=0.005-0.05$ level after the weighting is applied. The
bias we uncover can have either sign, depending on the samples and redshift
interval considered. For the highest redshift bin, the bias is larger than the
uncertainties in the other DES Y1 redshift calibration methods, justifying the
decision of not using this method for the redshift estimations. We discuss
several methods to mitigate this bias.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.13484 [pdf] - 2065205
Detection of cross-correlation between gravitational lensing and gamma
rays
Ammazzalorso, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Regis, M.;
Camera, S.;
Ando, S.;
Fornengo, N.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Choi, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gatti, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Omori, Y.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2019-07-31, last modified: 2020-01-22
In recent years, many gamma-ray sources have been identified, yet the
unresolved component hosts valuable information on the faintest emission. In
order to extract it, a cross-correlation with gravitational tracers of matter
in the Universe has been shown to be a promising tool. We report here the first
identification of a cross-correlation signal between gamma rays and the
distribution of mass in the Universe probed by weak gravitational lensing. We
use the Dark Energy Survey Y1 weak lensing catalogue and the Fermi Large Area
Telescope 9-year gamma-ray data, obtaining a signal-to-noise ratio of 5.3. The
signal is mostly localised at small angular scales and high gamma-ray energies,
with a hint of correlation at extended separation. Blazar emission is likely
the origin of the small-scale effect. We investigate implications of the
large-scale component in terms of astrophysical sources and particle dark
matter emission.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02499 [pdf] - 1995367
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological
Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, S.;
Lemos, P.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Raveri, M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-11-08
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models
dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a
combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the
first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external
data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated
scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $\Omega_k$, 2) number of relativistic species
$N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying
equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$
(alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$),
and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ that
modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck
CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements
from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on
curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external
data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find
$\Omega_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm
eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying
equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23},
-0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p,
w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1
combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the
temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the
present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $\Sigma_0=
0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(\Sigma_0,
\mu_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with
external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.06989 [pdf] - 1953361
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Intrinsic Alignments
and their Colour Dependence from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Samuroff, S.;
Blazek, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Krause, E.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Prat, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Larsen, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2018-11-16, last modified: 2019-08-06
We perform a joint analysis of intrinsic alignments and cosmology using
tomographic weak lensing, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
measurements from Year 1 (Y1) of the Dark Energy Survey. We define early- and
late-type subsamples, which are found to pass a series of systematics tests,
including for spurious photometric redshift error and point spread function
correlations. We analyse these split data alongside the fiducial mixed Y1
sample using a range of intrinsic alignment models. In a fiducial Nonlinear
Alignment Model (NLA) analysis, assuming a flat \lcdm~cosmology, we find a
significant difference in intrinsic alignment amplitude, with early-type
galaxies favouring $A_\mathrm{IA} = 2.38^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$ and late-type
galaxies consistent with no intrinsic alignments at $0.05^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$. We
find weak evidence of a diminishing alignment amplitude at higher redshifts in
the early-type sample. The analysis is repeated using a number of extended
model spaces, including a physically motivated model that includes both tidal
torquing and tidal alignment mechanisms. In multiprobe likelihood chains in
which cosmology, intrinsic alignments in both galaxy samples and all other
relevant systematics are varied simultaneously, we find the tidal alignment and
tidal torquing parts of the intrinsic alignment signal have amplitudes $A_1 =
2.66 ^{+0.67}_{-0.66}$, $A_2=-2.94^{+1.94}_{-1.83}$, respectively, for
early-type galaxies and $A_1 = 0.62 ^{+0.41}_{-0.41}$, $A_2 =
-2.26^{+1.30}_{-1.16}$ for late-type galaxies. In the full (mixed) Y1 sample
the best constraints are $A_1 = 0.70 ^{+0.41}_{-0.38}$, $A_2 = -1.36
^{+1.08}_{-1.41}$. For all galaxy splits and IA models considered, we report
cosmological parameter constraints that are consistent with the results of
Troxel et al. (2017) and Dark Energy Survey Collaboration (2017).
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.05005 [pdf] - 1938344
Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to
characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
Buchs, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Sánchez, C.;
Myles, J.;
Roodman, A.;
Allen, S.;
Amon, A.;
Choi, A.;
Masters, D. C.;
Miquel, R.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruend, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2019-01-15, last modified: 2019-08-05
Wide-field imaging surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) rely on
coarse measurements of spectral energy distributions in a few filters to
estimate the redshift distribution of source galaxies. In this regime, sample
variance, shot noise, and selection effects limit the attainable accuracy of
redshift calibration and thus of cosmological constraints. We present a new
method to combine wide-field, few-filter measurements with catalogs from deep
fields with additional filters and sufficiently low photometric noise to break
degeneracies in photometric redshifts. The multi-band deep field is used as an
intermediary between wide-field observations and accurate redshifts, greatly
reducing sample variance, shot noise, and selection effects. Our implementation
of the method uses self-organizing maps to group galaxies into phenotypes based
on their observed fluxes, and is tested using a mock DES catalog created from
N-body simulations. It yields a typical uncertainty on the mean redshift in
each of five tomographic bins for an idealized simulation of the DES Year 3
weak-lensing tomographic analysis of $\sigma_{\Delta z} = 0.007$, which is a
60% improvement compared to the Year 1 analysis. Although the implementation of
the method is tailored to DES, its formalism can be applied to other large
photometric surveys with a similar observing strategy.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05908 [pdf] - 1908558
Galaxies in X-ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey
Data II: Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of the Red-Sequence Galaxy Luminosity
Function
Zhang, Y.;
Miller, C. J.;
Rooney, P.;
Bermeo, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
cervantes, C. Vergara;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Hennig, C.;
Das, R.;
Mckay, T.;
Song, J.;
Wilcox, H.;
Bacon, D.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Collins, C.;
Conselice, C.;
Hilton, M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Kay, S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mehrtens, N.;
Mayers, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-levy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
rosell, A. Carnero;
kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Dandrea, C. B.;
Da costa, L. N.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Garcia-bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-10-16, last modified: 2019-06-29
Using $\sim 100$ X-ray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red
sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous
optical/X-ray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity
function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass ($13.5 \le
\rm{log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim< 15.0$). We pay particular attention to
completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply
a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schecter
function, including its characteristic break ($m^*$) to a faint end power-law
slope ($\alpha$). Our method enables us to avoid known issues in similar
analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and
statistically insignificant ($\sim 1.9 \sigma$) evolution in the faint end
slope $\alpha$ versus redshift. We also find no dependence in $\alpha$ or $m^*$
with the X-ray inferred cluster masses. However, the amplitude of the LF as a
function of cluster mass is constrained to $\sim 20\%$ precision. As a
by-product of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and
cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses
as well as the scatter in true mass given the X-ray inferred masses. This
technique can be applied to a larger sample of X-ray or optically selected
clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, significantly improving the sensitivity
of the analysis.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01018 [pdf] - 2088970
Monte Carlo Control Loops for cosmic shear cosmology with DES Year 1
Kacprzak, T.;
Herbel, J.;
Nicola, A.;
Sgier, R.;
Tarsitano, F.;
Bruderer, C.;
Amara, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Secco, L. F.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-06-03
Weak lensing by large-scale structure is a powerful probe of cosmology and of
the dark universe. This cosmic shear technique relies on the accurate
measurement of the shapes and redshifts of background galaxies and requires
precise control of systematic errors. The Monte Carlo Control Loops (MCCL) is a
forward modelling method designed to tackle this problem. It relies on the
Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) to produce simulated images tuned to match
the target data statistically, followed by calibrations and tolerance loops. We
present the first end-to-end application of this method, on the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Year 1 wide field imaging data. We simultaneously measure the
shear power spectrum $C_{\ell}$ and the redshift distribution $n(z)$ of the
background galaxy sample. The method includes maps of the systematic sources,
Point Spread Function (PSF), an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC)
inference of the simulation model parameters, a shear calibration scheme, and
the fast estimation of the covariance matrix. We find a close statistical
agreement between the simulations and the DES Y1 data using an array of
diagnostics. In a non-tomographic setting, we derive a set of $C_\ell$ and
$n(z)$ curves that encode the cosmic shear measurement, as well as the
systematic uncertainty. Following a blinding scheme, we measure the combination
of $\Omega_m$, $\sigma_8$, and intrinsic alignment amplitude $A_{\rm{IA}}$,
defined as $S_8D_{\rm{IA}} = \sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}D_{\rm{IA}}$, where
$D_{\rm{IA}}=1-0.11(A_{\rm{IA}}-1)$. We find
$S_8D_{\rm{IA}}=0.895^{+0.054}_{-0.039}$, where systematics are at the level of
roughly 60\% of the statistical errors. We discuss these results in the context
of earlier cosmic shear analyses of the DES Y1 data. Our findings indicate that
this method and its fast runtime offer good prospects for cosmic shear
measurements with future wide-field surveys.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12682 [pdf] - 2065167
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Wide field mass maps via forward
fitting in harmonic space
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Chang, C.;
Melchior, P.;
Rozo, E.;
Seitz, S.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Car- rasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2019-05-29
We present new wide-field weak lensing mass maps for the Year 1 Dark Energy
Survey data, generated via a forward fitting approach. This method of producing
maps does not impose any prior constraints on the mass distribution to be
reconstructed. The technique is found to improve the map reconstruction on the
edges of the field compared to the conventional Kaiser-Squires method, which
applies a direct inversion on the data; our approach is in good agreement with
the previous direct approach in the central regions of the footprint. The
mapping technique is assessed and verified with tests on simulations; together
with the Kaiser-Squires method, the technique is then applied to data from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data and the differences between the two methods are
compared. We also produce the first DES measurements of the convergence
Minkowski functionals and compare them to those measured in simulations.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.02401 [pdf] - 1811355
The Buzzard Flock: Dark Energy Survey Synthetic Sky Catalogs
DeRose, Joseph;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Becker, Matthew R.;
Busha, Michael T.;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
MacCrann, Niall;
Erickson, Brandon;
Evrard, August E.;
Kravtsov, Andrey;
Gruen, Daniel;
Allam, Sahar;
Avila, Santiago;
Bridle, Sarah;
Brooks, David;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Cawthon, Ross;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz N.;
Davis, Christopher;
De Vicente, Juan;
Dietrich, Jörg P.;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will G.;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Hoyle, Ben;
James, David J.;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lima, Marcos;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miller, Christopher J.;
Miquel, Ramon;
Ogando, Ricardo L. C.;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Romer, A. Kathy;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Schindler, Rafe;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio;
Smith, Mathew;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly E. C.;
Tarle, Gregory;
Vikram, Vinu
Submitted: 2019-01-08
We present a suite of 18 synthetic sky catalogs designed to support science
analysis of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data. For each
catalog, we use a computationally efficient empirical approach, ADDGALS, to
embed galaxies within light-cone outputs of three dark matter simulations that
resolve halos with masses above ~5x10^12 h^-1 m_sun at z <= 0.32 and 10^13 h^-1
m_sun at z~2. The embedding method is tuned to match the observed evolution of
galaxy counts at different luminosities as well as the spatial clustering of
the galaxy population. Galaxies are lensed by matter along the line of sight
--- including magnification, shear, and multiple images --- using CALCLENS, an
algorithm that calculates shear with 0.42 arcmin resolution at galaxy positions
in the full catalog. The catalogs presented here, each with the same LCDM
cosmology (denoted Buzzard), contain on average 820 million galaxies over an
area of 1120 square degrees with positions, magnitudes, shapes, photometric
errors, and photometric redshift estimates. We show that the weak-lensing shear
catalog, redMaGiC galaxy catalogs and redMaPPer cluster catalogs provide
plausible realizations of the same catalogs in the DES Y1 data by comparing
their magnitude, color and redshift distributions, angular clustering, and
mass-observable relations, making them useful for testing analyses that use
these samples. We make public the galaxy samples appropriate for the DES Y1
data, as well as the data vectors used for cosmology analyses on these
simulations.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.04533 [pdf] - 1822746
Weak Lensing Analysis of SPT selected Galaxy Clusters using Dark Energy
Survey Science Verification Data
Stern, C.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Bocquet, S.;
Applegate, D.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Gruen, D.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Saro, A.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Benson, B. A.;
Capasso, R.;
Chiu, I.;
Desai, S.;
Rapetti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Saliwanchik, B.;
Schrabback, T.;
Gupta, N.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-02-13, last modified: 2018-12-12
We present weak lensing (WL) mass constraints for a sample of massive galaxy
clusters detected by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) via the Sunyaev-Zeldovich
effect (SZE). We use $griz$ imaging data obtained from the Science Verification
(SV) phase of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to fit the WL shear signal of 33
clusters in the redshift range $0.25 \le z \le 0.8$ with NFW profiles and to
constrain a four-parameter SPT mass-observable relation. To account for biases
in WL masses, we introduce a WL mass to true mass scaling relation described by
a mean bias and an intrinsic, log-normal scatter. We allow for correlated
scatter within the WL and SZE mass-observable relations and use simulations to
constrain priors on nuisance parameters related to bias and scatter from WL. We
constrain the normalization of the $\zeta-M_{500}$ relation,
$A_\mathrm{SZ}=12.0_{-6.7}^{+2.6}$ when using a prior on the mass slope
$B_\mathrm{SZ}$ from the latest SPT cluster cosmology analysis. Without this
prior, we recover $A_\mathrm{SZ}=10.8_{-5.2}^{+2.3}$ and
$B_\mathrm{SZ}=1.30_{-0.44}^{+0.22}$. Results in both cases imply lower cluster
masses than measured in previous work with and without WL, although the
uncertainties are large. The WL derived value of $B_\mathrm{SZ}$ is $\approx
20\%$ lower than the value preferred by the most recent SPT cluster cosmology
analysis. The method demonstrated in this work is designed to constrain cluster
masses and cosmological parameters simultaneously and will form the basis for
subsequent studies that employ the full SPT cluster sample together with the
DES data.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06116 [pdf] - 1795744
Moment-Based Ellipticity Measurement as a Statistical Parameter
Estimation Problem
Submitted: 2018-07-16, last modified: 2018-12-07
We show that galaxy ellipticity estimation for weak gravitational lensing
with unweighted image moments reduces to the problem of measuring a combination
of the means of three independent normal random variables. Under very general
assumptions, the intrinsic image moments of sources can be recovered from
observations including effects such as the point-spread function and
pixellation. Gaussian pixel noise turns these into three jointly normal random
variables, the means of which are algebraically related to the ellipticity. We
show that the random variables are approximately independent with known
variances, and provide an algorithm for making them exactly independent. Once
the framework is developed, we derive general properties of the ellipticity
estimation problem, such as the signal-to-noise ratio, a generic form of an
ellipticity estimator, and Cram\'er-Rao lower bounds for an unbiased estimator.
We then derive the unbiased ellipticity estimator using unweighted image
moments. We find that this unbiased estimator has a poorly behaved distribution
and does not converge in practical applications, but demonstrates how to derive
and understand the behaviour of new moment-based ellipticity estimators.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02342 [pdf] - 1929685
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: tomographic cross-correlations
between DES galaxies and CMB lensing from SPT+Planck
Omori, Y.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Porredon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Alarcon, A.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T.;
Dodelson, S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
Holder, G. P.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Muir, J.;
Prat, J.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Simard, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lima, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We measure the cross-correlation between redMaGiC galaxies selected from the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-1 data and gravitational lensing of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) reconstructed from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and
Planck data over 1289 sq. deg. When combining measurements across multiple
galaxy redshift bins spanning the redshift range of $0.15<z<0.90$, we reject
the hypothesis of no correlation at 19.9$\sigma$ significance. When removing
small-scale data points where thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal and nonlinear
galaxy bias could potentially bias our results, the detection significance is
reduced to 9.9$\sigma$. We perform a joint analysis of galaxy-CMB lensing
cross-correlations and galaxy clustering to constrain cosmology, finding
$\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.276^{+0.029}_{-0.030}$ and
$S_{8}=\sigma_{8}\sqrt{\mathstrut \Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.800^{+0.090}_{-0.094}$. We also perform two alternate analyses aimed at
constraining only the growth rate of cosmic structure as a function of
redshift, finding consistency with predictions from the concordance
$\Lambda$CDM model. The measurements presented here are part of a joint
cosmological analysis that combines galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing and CMB
lensing using data from DES, SPT and Planck.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02441 [pdf] - 1945701
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1
galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
Omori, Y.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Kirk, D.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Simard, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak
lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an
effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements
from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing
with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this
significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest
signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the
correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the
correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias,
obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally,
when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain
the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and
$S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$.
These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies,
galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00039 [pdf] - 1767415
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of
redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shin, T.;
Melchior, P.;
DeRose, J.;
Seitz, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
von der Linden, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mantz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Allen, S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Farahi, A.;
Hamaus, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Israel, H.;
Li, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Morris, G.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pollina, G.;
Rau, M. M.;
Simet, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-30, last modified: 2018-09-12
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01533 [pdf] - 1746405
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
Zuntz, J.;
Sheldon, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Jarvis, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Gruen, D.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Choi, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fang, Y.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
Kirk, D.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krawiec, C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soergel, B.;
Varga, T. N.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-09-07
We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1
data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of $0.59$. The
catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South
Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in
particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement
pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a
Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied
to $riz$-bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a
maximum-likelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was
applied to $r$-band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite
of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science.
We estimate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to
be $0.013$ and $0.025$ for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues,
respectively.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01536 [pdf] - 1747811
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy clustering for combined probes
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Avila, S.;
Banik, N.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Friedrich, O.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sanchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Moller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
ONeill, C. R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-08-28
We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of large-scale structure and lensing
correlations. Two-point correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the two-point auto- and cross-correlation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.10163 [pdf] - 1897837
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Galaxy Angular
Power Spectrum
Camacho, H.;
Kokron, N.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Lima, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sobreira, F.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Avila, S.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Troja, A.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lin, H.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-07-26
We use data from the first-year (Y1) observations of the DES collaboration to
measure the galaxy angular power spectrum (APS), and search for its BAO feature
using a template-fitting method. We test our methodology in a sample of 1800
DES Y1-like mock catalogs. The APS is measured with the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method,
using pixelized maps constructed from the mock catalogs and the DES mask. The
covariance matrix of the $C_\ell$'s in these tests are also obtained from the
mock catalogs. We use templates to model the measured spectra and estimate
template parameters firstly from the $C_\ell$'s of the mocks using two
different methods, a maximum likelihood estimator and a MCMC, finding
consistent results with a good reduced $\chi^2$. Robustness tests are performed
to estimate the impact of different choices of settings used in our analysis.
After these tests on mocks, we apply our method to a galaxy sample constructed
from DES Y1 data specifically for LSS studies. This catalog comprises galaxies
within an effective area of 1318 deg$^2$ and $0.6<z<1.0$. We fit the observed
spectra with our optimized templates, considering models with and without BAO
features. We find that the DES Y1 data favors a model with BAO at the
$2.6\,\sigma$ C.L. with a best-fit shift parameter of $\alpha=1.023\pm 0.047$.
However, the goodness-of-fit is somewhat poor, with $\chi^2/$(dof) = 1.49. We
identify a possible cause of this issue and show that using a theoretical
covariance matrix obtained from $C_\ell$'s that are better adjusted to data
results in an improved value of $\chi^2/$(dof) = 1.36 which is similar to the
value obtained with the real-space analysis. Our results correspond to a
distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff} = 0.81)/r_d = 10.65 \pm 0.49$,
consistent with the main DES BAO findings. This is a companion paper to the
main DES BAO article showing the details of the harmonic space analysis.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05045 [pdf] - 1722433
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and
lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Krause, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hilbert, S.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Prat, J.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-10-13, last modified: 2018-07-24
We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.3409 [pdf] - 1659486
CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation
Submitted: 2014-09-11, last modified: 2018-04-03
Cosmological parameter estimation is entering a new era. Large collaborations
need to coordinate high-stakes analyses using multiple methods; furthermore
such analyses have grown in complexity due to sophisticated models of cosmology
and systematic uncertainties. In this paper we argue that modularity is the key
to addressing these challenges: calculations should be broken up into
interchangeable modular units with inputs and outputs clearly defined. We
present a new framework for cosmological parameter estimation, CosmoSIS,
designed to connect together, share, and advance development of inference tools
across the community. We describe the modules already available in CosmoSIS,
including CAMB, Planck, cosmic shear calculations, and a suite of samplers. We
illustrate it using demonstration code that you can run out-of-the-box with the
installer available at http://bitbucket.org/joezuntz/cosmosis
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.08167 [pdf] - 1580283
Galaxy bias from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the DES Science Verification
Data
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Miquel, R.;
Kwan, J.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Amara, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Jarvis, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Percival, W. J.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2016-09-26, last modified: 2017-09-26
We present a measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing around a magnitude-limited
($i_{AB} < 22.5$) sample of galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification (DES-SV) data. We split these lenses into three
photometric-redshift bins from 0.2 to 0.8, and determine the product of the
galaxy bias $b$ and cross-correlation coefficient between the galaxy and dark
matter overdensity fields $r$ in each bin, using scales above 4 Mpc/$h$
comoving, where we find the linear bias model to be valid given our current
uncertainties. We compare our galaxy bias results from galaxy-galaxy lensing
with those obtained from galaxy clustering (Crocce et al. 2016) and CMB lensing
(Giannantonio et al. 2016) for the same sample of galaxies, and find our
measurements to be in good agreement with those in Crocce et al. (2016), while,
in the lowest redshift bin ($z\sim0.3$), they show some tension with the
findings in Giannantonio et al. (2016). We measure $b\cdot r$ to be $0.87\pm
0.11$, $1.12 \pm 0.16$ and $1.24\pm 0.23$, respectively for the three redshift
bins of width $\Delta z = 0.2$ in the range $0.2<z <0.8$, defined with the
photometric-redshift algorithm BPZ. Using a different code to split the lens
sample, TPZ, leads to changes in the measured biases at the 10-20\% level, but
it does not alter the main conclusion of this work: when comparing with Crocce
et al. (2016) we do not find strong evidence for a cross-correlation parameter
significantly below one in this galaxy sample, except possibly at the lowest
redshift bin ($z\sim 0.3$), where we find $r = 0.71 \pm 0.11$ when using TPZ,
and $0.83 \pm 0.12$ with BPZ.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01534 [pdf] - 1648606
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Impact of Galaxy Neighbours on
Weak Lensing Cosmology with im3shape
Samuroff, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Zuntz, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Huff, E. M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.
Submitted: 2017-08-04
We use a suite of simulated images based on Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey
to explore the impact of galaxy neighbours on shape measurement and shear
cosmology. The hoopoe image simulations include realistic blending, galaxy
positions, and spatial variations in depth and PSF properties. Using the
im3shape maximum-likelihood shape measurement code, we identify four mechanisms
by which neighbours can have a non-negligible influence on shear estimation.
These effects, if ignored, would contribute a net multiplicative bias of $m
\sim 0.03 - 0.09$ in the DES Y1 im3shape catalogue, though the precise impact
will be dependent on both the measurement code and the selection cuts applied.
This can be reduced to percentage level or less by removing objects with close
neighbours, at a cost to the effective number density of galaxies
$n_\mathrm{eff}$ of 30%. We use the cosmological inference pipeline of DES Y1
to explore the cosmological implications of neighbour bias and show that
omitting blending from the calibration simulation for DES Y1 would bias the
inferred clustering amplitude $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega _\mathrm{m}
/0.3)^{0.5}$ by $2 \sigma$ towards low values. Finally, we use the hoopoe
simulations to test the effect of neighbour-induced spatial correlations in the
multiplicative bias. We find the impact on the recovered $S_8$ of ignoring such
correlations to be subdominant to statistical error at the current level of
precision.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05552 [pdf] - 1572642
Cosmology from Cosmic Shear with DES Science Verification Data
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bacon, D.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Bruderer, C.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Erickson, B.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Hirsch, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Kwan, J.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Refregier, A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sabiu, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sako, M.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Seo, H.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2017-05-03
We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science
Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less
than 3\% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2-point measurements
over three redshift bins we find $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.81
\pm 0.06$ (68\% confidence), after marginalising over 7 systematics parameters
and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results
to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be
stable. About $20$\% of our error bar comes from marginalising over shear and
photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current state-of-the-art
cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the
cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with
both datasets. Our uncertainties are $\sim$30\% larger than those from CFHTLenS
when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two datasets, which we attribute
largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate
constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full
survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck
constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values
of $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of
$w$.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.06890 [pdf] - 1580445
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark
Energy Survey Science Verification data
Melchior, P.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Sheldon, E.;
Rozo, E.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Clampitt, J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kacprzak, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Saro, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-10-21, last modified: 2017-04-28
We use weak-lensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of
optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification
data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer
clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq
\lambda \leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass
density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources
of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors;
cluster-member contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo
profile; halo triaxiality; and line-of-sight projections. We combine the
inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass,
richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,z) \varpropto M_0 \lambda^{F}
(1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle
M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,|\,\lambda=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)}
\pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F =
1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\,
0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the mass-richness
relation is in excellent agreement with the weak-lensing calibration of
redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al.
(2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPT-detected clusters. Our
results extend the redshift range over which the mass-richness relation of
redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to
$z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric
redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial
improvements for forthcoming studies.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.00032 [pdf] - 1528091
A Combined View of Sterile-Neutrino Constraints from CMB and Neutrino
Oscillation Measurements
Submitted: 2016-06-30, last modified: 2016-11-25
We perform a comparative analysis of constraints on sterile neutrinos from
the Planck experiment and from current and future neutrino oscillation
experiments (MINOS, IceCube, SBN). For the first time, we express the Planck
constraints on $N_{\rm eff}$ and $m_{\rm eff}^{\rm sterile}$ from the Cosmic
Microwave Background in the parameter space used by oscillation experiments
using both mass-squared differences and mixing angles. In a model with a single
sterile neutrino species and using standard assumptions, we find that the
Planck data and the oscillation experiments measuring muon-neutrino
disappearance have similar sensitivity.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00329 [pdf] - 1516249
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Aleksic, J.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brunner, R. J.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Caminha, G. B.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlsen, J.;
Carnero-Rosell, A.;
Carollo, M.;
Carrasco-Kind, M.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Clerkin, L.;
Collett, T.;
Conselice, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Estrada, J.;
Etherington, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fabbri, J.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Rosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Guarnieri, P.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Jouvel, S.;
Kessler, R.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
Maraston, C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Merson, A.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morice-Atkinson, X.;
Naidoo, K.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Palmese, A.;
Papadopoulos, A.;
Peiris, H.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reed, S. L.;
Refregier, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Soumagnac, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Whiteway, L.;
Wilcox, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2016-01-03, last modified: 2016-08-19
This overview article describes the legacy prospect and discovery potential
of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) beyond cosmological studies, illustrating it
with examples from the DES early data. DES is using a wide-field camera (DECam)
on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile to image 5000 sq deg of the sky in five
filters (grizY). By its completion the survey is expected to have generated a
catalogue of 300 million galaxies with photometric redshifts and 100 million
stars. In addition, a time-domain survey search over 27 sq deg is expected to
yield a sample of thousands of Type Ia supernovae and other transients. The
main goals of DES are to characterise dark energy and dark matter, and to test
alternative models of gravity; these goals will be pursued by studying large
scale structure, cluster counts, weak gravitational lensing and Type Ia
supernovae. However, DES also provides a rich data set which allows us to study
many other aspects of astrophysics. In this paper we focus on additional
science with DES, emphasizing areas where the survey makes a difference with
respect to other current surveys. The paper illustrates, using early data (from
`Science Verification', and from the first, second and third seasons of
observations), what DES can tell us about the solar system, the Milky Way,
galaxy evolution, quasars, and other topics. In addition, we show that if the
cosmological model is assumed to be Lambda+ Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) then
important astrophysics can be deduced from the primary DES probes. Highlights
from DES early data include the discovery of 34 Trans Neptunian Objects, 17
dwarf satellites of the Milky Way, one published z > 6 quasar (and more
confirmed) and two published superluminous supernovae (and more confirmed).
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.01838 [pdf] - 1531199
Inference from the small scales of cosmic shear with current and future
Dark Energy Survey data
MacCrann, N.;
Aleksić, J.;
Amara, A.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Bruderer, C.;
Chang, C.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Refregier, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Armstrong, R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2016-08-05
Cosmic shear is sensitive to fluctuations in the cosmological matter density
field, including on small physical scales, where matter clustering is affected
by baryonic physics in galaxies and galaxy clusters, such as star formation,
supernovae feedback and AGN feedback. While muddying any cosmological
information that is contained in small scale cosmic shear measurements, this
does mean that cosmic shear has the potential to constrain baryonic physics and
galaxy formation. We perform an analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) cosmic shear measurements, now extended to smaller
scales, and using the Mead et al. 2015 halo model to account for baryonic
feedback. While the SV data has limited statistical power, we demonstrate using
a simulated likelihood analysis that the final DES data will have the
statistical power to differentiate among baryonic feedback scenarios. We also
explore some of the difficulties in interpreting the small scales in cosmic
shear measurements, presenting estimates of the size of several other
systematic effects that make inference from small scales difficult, including
uncertainty in the modelling of intrinsic alignment on nonlinear scales,
`lensing bias', and shape measurement selection effects. For the latter two, we
make use of novel image simulations. While future cosmic shear datasets have
the statistical power to constrain baryonic feedback scenarios, there are
several systematic effects that require improved treatments, in order to make
robust conclusions about baryonic feedback.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05598 [pdf] - 1445264
Cosmic Shear Measurements with DES Science Verification Data
Becker, M. R.;
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Nicola, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Chang, C.;
Dodelson, S.;
Erickson, B.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Leistedt, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sabiu, C.;
Sanchez, C.;
Seo, H.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Collaboration, The DES
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2016-07-27
We present measurements of weak gravitational lensing cosmic shear two-point
statistics using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. We demonstrate
that our results are robust to the choice of shear measurement pipeline, either
ngmix or im3shape, and robust to the choice of two-point statistic, including
both real and Fourier-space statistics. Our results pass a suite of null tests
including tests for B-mode contamination and direct tests for any dependence of
the two-point functions on a set of 16 observing conditions and galaxy
properties, such as seeing, airmass, galaxy color, galaxy magnitude, etc. We
furthermore use a large suite of simulations to compute the covariance matrix
of the cosmic shear measurements and assign statistical significance to our
null tests. We find that our covariance matrix is consistent with the halo
model prediction, indicating that it has the appropriate level of halo sample
variance. We compare the same jackknife procedure applied to the data and the
simulations in order to search for additional sources of noise not captured by
the simulations. We find no statistically significant extra sources of noise in
the data. The overall detection significance with tomography for our highest
source density catalog is 9.7sigma. Cosmological constraints from the
measurements in this work are presented in a companion paper (DES et al. 2015).
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.07910 [pdf] - 1513600
Simultaneous Constraints on Cosmology and Photometric Redshift Bias from
Weak Lensing and Galaxy Clustering
Submitted: 2016-07-26
We investigate the expected cosmological constraints from a combination of
weak lensing and large-scale galaxy clustering using realistic redshift
distributions. Introducing a systematic bias in the weak lensing redshift
distributions (of 0.05 in redshift) produces a $>2\sigma$ bias in the recovered
matter power spectrum amplitude and dark energy equation of state, for
preliminary Stage III surveys. We demonstrate that these cosmological errors
can be largely removed by marginalising over unknown biases in the assumed weak
lensing redshift distributions, if we assume high quality redshift information
for the galaxy clustering sample. Furthermore the cosmological constraining
power is mostly retained despite removing much of the information on the weak
lensing redshift distribution biases. We show that this comes from
complementary degeneracy directions between cosmic shear and the combination of
galaxy clustering with cross-correlation between shear and galaxy number
density. Finally we examine how the self-calibration performs when the assumed
distributions differ from the true distributions by more than a simple uniform
bias. We find that the effectiveness of this self-calibration method will
depend on the details of a given experiment and the nature of the uncertainties
on the estimated redshift distributions.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05603 [pdf] - 1411151
The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogues
Jarvis, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zuntz, J.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Amara, A.;
Armstrong, R.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Chang, C.;
Das, R.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Gruen, D.;
Hirsch, M.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jain, B.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Melchior, P.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Refregier, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2015-07-20, last modified: 2016-04-25
We present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken
during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera
(DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We describe our object
selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures
using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce
catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies respectively. We detail a
set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the
requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing
science applications using the SV data. We also discuss some of the planned
algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently
accurate shear catalogues for the full 5-year DES, which is expected to cover
5000 square degrees.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05040 [pdf] - 1470597
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey
Science Verification data
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Amara, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Marian, L.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Suchyta, E.;
Aleksić, J.;
Bacon, D.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Chang, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Hartley, W.;
Huff, E. M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Melchior, P.;
Nicola, A.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2016-03-16
Shear peak statistics has gained a lot of attention recently as a practical
alternative to the two point statistics for constraining cosmological
parameters. We perform a shear peak statistics analysis of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data, using weak gravitational lensing
measurements from a 139 deg$^2$ field. We measure the abundance of peaks
identified in aperture mass maps, as a function of their signal-to-noise ratio,
in the signal-to-noise range $0<\mathcal S / \mathcal N<4$. To predict the peak
counts as a function of cosmological parameters we use a suite of $N$-body
simulations spanning 158 models with varying $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$,
fixing $w = -1$, $\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.04$, $h = 0.7$ and $n_s=1$, to which we
have applied the DES SV mask and redshift distribution. In our fiducial
analysis we measure $\sigma_{8}(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.6}=0.77 \pm 0.07$, after
marginalising over the shear multiplicative bias and the error on the mean
redshift of the galaxy sample. We introduce models of intrinsic alignments,
blending, and source contamination by cluster members. These models indicate
that peaks with $\mathcal S / \mathcal N>4$ would require significant
corrections, which is why we do not include them in our analysis. We compare
our results to the cosmological constraints from the two point analysis on the
SV field and find them to be in good agreement in both the central value and
its uncertainty. We discuss prospects for future peak statistics analysis with
upcoming DES data.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04535 [pdf] - 1378743
Cross-correlation of gravitational lensing from DES Science Verification
data with SPT and Planck lensing
Kirk, D.;
Omori, Y.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Larsen, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Holder, G.;
Jain, B.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
Nicola, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Sheldon, E.;
Story, K. T.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We measure the cross-correlation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on
different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass
fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg$^{2}$ of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from
the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a
median redshift of $z_{\rm med} {\sim} 0.7$, while the CMB lensing kernel is
broad and peaks at $z{\sim}2$. The resulting cross-correlation is maximally
sensitive to mass fluctuations at $z{\sim}0.44$. Assuming the Planck 2015
best-fit cosmology, the amplitude of the DES$\times$SPT cross-power is found to
be $A = 0.88 \pm 0.30$ and that from DES$\times$Planck to be $A = 0.86 \pm
0.39$, where $A=1$ corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are
consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of $2.9
\sigma$ and $2.2 \sigma$ respectively. We demonstrate that our results are
robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear
measurement method, estimator choice, photometric redshift uncertainty and CMB
lensing systematics. Significant intrinsic alignment of galaxy shapes would
increase the cross-correlation signal inferred from the data; we calculate a
value of $A = 1.08 \pm 0.36$ for DES$\times$SPT when we correct the
observations with a simple IA model. With three measurements of this
cross-correlation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable
evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of cross-correlation,
given the size of the statistical uncertainties and the significant impact of
systematic errors, particularly IAs. We provide forecasts for the expected
signal-to-noise of the combination of the five-year DES survey and SPT-3G.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05090 [pdf] - 1324854
Weak lensing by galaxy troughs in DES Science Verification data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D.;
Bonnett, C.;
Hartley, W.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Krause, E.;
Mana, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Seitz, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-17, last modified: 2015-12-08
We measure the weak lensing shear around galaxy troughs, i.e. the radial
alignment of background galaxies relative to underdensities in projections of
the foreground galaxy field over a wide range of redshift in Science
Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey. Our detection of the shear
signal is highly significant (10 to 15$\sigma$ for the smallest angular scales)
for troughs with the redshift range z in [0.2,0.5] of the projected galaxy
field and angular diameters of 10 arcmin...1{\deg}. These measurements probe
the connection between the galaxy, matter density, and convergence fields. By
assuming galaxies are biased tracers of the matter density with Poissonian
noise, we find agreement of our measurements with predictions in a fiducial
Lambda cold dark matter model. The prediction for the lensing signal on large
trough scales is virtually independent of the details of the underlying model
for the connection of galaxies and matter. Our comparison of the shear around
troughs with that around cylinders with large galaxy counts is consistent with
a symmetry between galaxy and matter over- and underdensities. In addition, we
measure the two-point angular correlation of troughs with galaxies which, in
contrast to the lensing signal, is sensitive to galaxy bias on all scales. The
lensing signal of troughs and their clustering with galaxies is therefore a
promising probe of the statistical properties of matter underdensities and
their connection to the galaxy field.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05353 [pdf] - 1490633
Joint Analysis of Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing and Galaxy Clustering:
Methodology and Forecasts for DES
Park, Y.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Jain, B.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Honscheid, K.;
Rozo, E.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sánchez, C.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-19, last modified: 2015-09-16
The joint analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering is a
promising method for inferring the growth function of large scale structure.
This analysis will be carried out on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES),
with its measurements of both the distribution of galaxies and the tangential
shears of background galaxies induced by these foreground lenses. We develop a
practical approach to modeling the assumptions and systematic effects affecting
small scale lensing, which provides halo masses, and large scale galaxy
clustering. Introducing parameters that characterize the halo occupation
distribution (HOD), photometric redshift uncertainties, and shear measurement
errors, we study how external priors on different subsets of these parameters
affect our growth constraints. Degeneracies within the HOD model, as well as
between the HOD and the growth function, are identified as the dominant source
of complication, with other systematic effects sub-dominant. The impact of HOD
parameters and their degeneracies necessitate the detailed joint modeling of
the galaxy sample that we employ. We conclude that DES data will provide
powerful constraints on the evolution of structure growth in the universe,
conservatively/optimistically constraining the growth function to 7.9\%/4.8\%
with its first-year data that covered over 1000 square degrees, and to
3.9\%/2.3\% with its full five-year data that will survey 5000 square degrees,
including both statistical and systematic uncertainties.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05909 [pdf] - 1475231
Redshift distributions of galaxies in the DES Science Verification shear
catalogue and implications for weak lensing
Bonnett, C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Hartley, W.;
Amara, A.;
Leistedt, B.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S.;
Bruderer, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Childress, M. J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Frieman, J.;
Gangkofner, C.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gruen, D.;
Kacprzak, T.;
King, A.;
Kwan, J.;
Lahav, O.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Palmese, A.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Refregier, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Uddin, S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2015-07-21, last modified: 2015-07-23
We present photometric redshift estimates for galaxies used in the weak
lensing analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES SV) data.
Four model- or machine learning-based photometric redshift methods -- ANNZ2,
BPZ calibrated against BCC-Ufig simulations, SkyNet, and TPZ -- are analysed.
For training, calibration, and testing of these methods, we construct a
catalogue of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies matched against DES SV data.
The performance of the methods is evaluated against the matched spectroscopic
catalogue, focusing on metrics relevant for weak lensing analyses, with
additional validation against COSMOS photo-zs. From the galaxies in the DES SV
shear catalogue, which have mean redshift $0.72\pm0.01$ over the range
$0.3<z<1.3$, we construct three tomographic bins with means of $z=\{0.45, 0.67,
1.00\}$. These bins each have systematic uncertainties $\delta z \lesssim 0.05$
in the mean of the fiducial SkyNet photo-z $n(z)$. We propagate the errors in
the redshift distributions through to their impact on cosmological parameters
estimated with cosmic shear, and find that they cause shifts in the value of
$\sigma_8$ of approx. 3%. This shift is within the one sigma statistical errors
on $\sigma_8$ for the DES SV shear catalog. We further study the potential
impact of systematic differences on the critical surface density,
$\Sigma_{\mathrm{crit}}$, finding levels of bias safely less than the
statistical power of DES SV data. We recommend a final Gaussian prior for the
photo-z bias in the mean of $n(z)$ of width $0.05$ for each of the three
tomographic bins, and show that this is a sufficient bias model for the
corresponding cosmology analysis.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.05647 [pdf] - 1501879
Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially-varying observing
conditions in DES Science Verification data
Leistedt, B.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Elsner, F.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Amara, A.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bruderer, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Chang, C.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Huff, E. M.;
Lahav, O.;
Palmese, A.;
Percival, W. J.;
Refregier, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2015-07-20
Spatially-varying depth and characteristics of observing conditions, such as
seeing, airmass, or sky background, are major sources of systematic
uncertainties in modern galaxy survey analyses, in particular in deep
multi-epoch surveys. We present a framework to extract and project these
sources of systematics onto the sky, and apply it to the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) to map the observing conditions of the Science Verification (SV) data.
The resulting distributions and maps of sources of systematics are used in
several analyses of DES SV to perform detailed null tests with the data, and
also to incorporate systematics in survey simulations. We illustrate the
complementarity of these two approaches by comparing the SV data with the
BCC-UFig, a synthetic sky catalogue generated by forward-modelling of the DES
SV images. We analyse the BCC-UFig simulation to construct galaxy samples
mimicking those used in SV galaxy clustering studies. We show that the
spatially-varying survey depth imprinted in the observed galaxy densities and
the redshift distributions of the SV data are successfully reproduced by the
simulation and well-captured by the maps of observing conditions. The combined
use of the maps, the SV data and the BCC-UFig simulation allows us to quantify
the impact of spatial systematics on $N(z)$, the redshift distributions
inferred using photometric redshifts. We conclude that spatial systematics in
the SV data are mainly due to seeing fluctuations and are under control in
current clustering and weak lensing analyses. The framework presented here is
relevant to all multi-epoch surveys, and will be essential for exploiting
future surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), which will
require detailed null-tests and realistic end-to-end image simulations to
correctly interpret the deep, high-cadence observations of the sky.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.03002 [pdf] - 1248536
Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from DES Science Verification Data:
Methodology and Detailed Analysis
Vikram, V.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brout, D.;
Busha, M.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hartley, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
Lin, H.;
Melchior, P.;
Peiris, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2015-04-12, last modified: 2015-07-20
Weak gravitational lensing allows one to reconstruct the spatial distribution
of the projected mass density across the sky. These "mass maps" provide a
powerful tool for studying cosmology as they probe both luminous and dark
matter. In this paper, we present a weak lensing mass map reconstructed from
shear measurements in a 139 sq. deg area from the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) data. We compare the distribution of mass with that
of the foreground distribution of galaxies and clusters. The overdensities in
the reconstructed map correlate well with the distribution of optically
detected clusters. We demonstrate that candidate superclusters and voids along
the line of sight can be identified, exploiting the tight scatter of the
cluster photometric redshifts. We cross-correlate the mass map with a
foreground magnitude-limited galaxy sample from the same data. Our measurement
gives results consistent with mock catalogs from N-body simulations that
include the primary sources of statistical uncertainties in the galaxy,
lensing, and photo-z catalogs. The statistical significance of the
cross-correlation is at the 6.8-sigma level with 20 arcminute smoothing. A
major goal of this study is to investigate systematic effects arising from a
variety of sources, including PSF and photo-z uncertainties. We make maps
derived from twenty variables that may characterize systematics and find the
principal components. We find that the contribution of systematics to the
lensing mass maps is generally within measurement uncertainties. In this work,
we analyze less than 3% of the final area that will be mapped by the DES; the
tools and analysis techniques developed in this paper can be applied to
forthcoming larger datasets from the survey.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.01871 [pdf] - 1255013
Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from DES Science Verification Data
Chang, C.;
Vikram, V.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Amara, A.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G.;
Bonnett, C.;
Bridle, S.;
Brout, D.;
Busha, M.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hartley, W.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Lin, H.;
Melchior, P.;
Peiris, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bauer, A. H.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sevilla, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2015-05-07, last modified: 2015-07-20
We present a mass map reconstructed from weak gravitational lensing shear
measurements over 139 sq. deg from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science
Verification data. The mass map probes both luminous and dark matter, thus
providing a tool for studying cosmology. We find good agreement between the
mass map and the distribution of massive galaxy clusters identified using a
red-sequence cluster finder. Potential candidates for super-clusters and voids
are identified using these maps. We measure the cross-correlation between the
mass map and a magnitude-limited foreground galaxy sample and find a detection
at the 5-7 sigma level on a large range of scales. These measurements are
consistent with simulated galaxy catalogs based on LCDM N-body simulations,
suggesting low systematics uncertainties in the map. We summarize our key
findings in this letter; the detailed methodology and tests for systematics are
presented in a companion paper.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4742 [pdf] - 1238823
Cosmic Discordance: Are Planck CMB and CFHTLenS weak lensing
measurements out of tune?
Submitted: 2014-08-20, last modified: 2015-06-29
We examine the level of agreement between low redshift weak lensing data and
the CMB using measurements from the CFHTLenS and Planck+WMAP polarization. We
perform an independent analysis of the CFHTLenS six bin tomography results of
Heymans et al. (2013). We extend their systematics treatment and find the
cosmological constraints to be relatively robust to the choice of non-linear
modeling, extension to the intrinsic alignment model and inclusion of baryons.
We find that the 90% confidence contours of CFHTLenS and Planck+WP do not
overlap even in the full 6-dimensional parameter space of $\Lambda$CDM, so the
two datasets are discrepant. Allowing a massive active neutrino or tensor modes
does not significantly resolve the disagreement in the full n-dimensional
parameter space. Our results differ from some in the literature because we use
the full tomographic information in the weak lensing data and marginalize over
systematics. We note that adding a sterile neutrino to $\Lambda$CDM does bring
the 8-dimensional 64% contours to overlap, mainly due to the extra effective
number of neutrino species, which we find to be 0.84 $\pm$ 0.35 (68%) greater
than standard on combining the datasets. We discuss why this is not a
completely satisfactory resolution, leaving open the possibility of other new
physics or observational systematics as contributing factors. We provide
updated cosmology fitting functions for the CFHTLenS constraints and discuss
the differences from ones used in the literature.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.4285 [pdf] - 996594
Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark
Energy Survey Science Verification data
Melchior, P.;
Suchyta, E.;
Huff, E.;
Hirsch, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Rykoff, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bacon, D.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S.;
Clampitt, J.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
Jouvel, S.;
Krause, E.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Patton, K.;
Plazas, A.;
Rowe, B.;
Vikram, V.;
Wilcox, H.;
Young, J.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S. S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bernstein, J. P.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Depoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G. R.;
Jarvis, M.;
Karliner, I.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B. D.;
Reil, K.;
Roe, N. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B. X.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Sypniewski, A. J.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A.;
Wechsler, R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2014-05-16, last modified: 2015-02-28
We measure the weak-lensing masses and galaxy distributions of four massive
galaxy clusters observed during the Science Verification phase of the Dark
Energy Survey. This pathfinder study is meant to 1) validate the DECam imager
for the task of measuring weak-lensing shapes, and 2) utilize DECam's large
field of view to map out the clusters and their environments over 90 arcmin. We
conduct a series of rigorous tests on astrometry, photometry, image quality,
PSF modeling, and shear measurement accuracy to single out flaws in the data
and also to identify the optimal data processing steps and parameters. We find
Science Verification data from DECam to be suitable for the lensing analysis
described in this paper. The PSF is generally well-behaved, but the modeling is
rendered difficult by a flux-dependent PSF width and ellipticity. We employ
photometric redshifts to distinguish between foreground and background
galaxies, and a red-sequence cluster finder to provide cluster richness
estimates and cluster-galaxy distributions. By fitting NFW profiles to the
clusters in this study, we determine weak-lensing masses that are in agreement
with previous work. For Abell 3261, we provide the first estimates of redshift,
weak-lensing mass, and richness. In addition, the cluster-galaxy distributions
indicate the presence of filamentary structures attached to 1E 0657-56 and RXC
J2248.7-4431, stretching out as far as 1 degree (approximately 20 Mpc),
showcasing the potential of DECam and DES for detailed studies of degree-scale
features on the sky.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.03977 [pdf] - 922521
Synergy between the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope and the Square
Kilometre Array
Bacon, David;
Bridle, Sarah;
Abdalla, Filipe B.;
Brown, Michael;
Bull, Philip;
Camera, Stefano;
Fender, Rob;
Grainge, Keith;
Ivezic, Zeljko;
Jarvis, Matt;
Jackson, Neal;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Mann, Bob;
McEwen, Jason;
McKean, John;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Raccanelli, Alvise;
Sahlen, Martin;
Santos, Mario;
Tyson, Anthony;
Zhao, Gong-Bo
Submitted: 2015-01-16
We provide an overview of the science benefits of combining information from
the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
(LSST). We first summarise the capabilities and timeline of the LSST and
overview its science goals. We then discuss the science questions in common
between the two projects, and how they can be best addressed by combining the
data from both telescopes. We describe how weak gravitational lensing and
galaxy clustering studies with LSST and SKA can provide improved constraints on
the causes of the cosmological acceleration. We summarise the benefits to
galaxy evolution studies of combining deep optical multi-band imaging with
radio observations. Finally, we discuss the excellent match between one of the
most unique features of the LSST, its temporal cadence in the optical waveband,
and the time resolution of the SKA.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.03828 [pdf] - 922500
Weak gravitational lensing with the Square Kilometre Array
Brown, M. L.;
Bacon, D. J.;
Camera, S.;
Harrison, I.;
Joachimi, B.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Takahashi, K.;
Zuntz, J. A.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Bridle, S.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Miller, L.;
Patel, P.
Submitted: 2015-01-15
We investigate the capabilities of various stages of the SKA to perform
world-leading weak gravitational lensing surveys. We outline a way forward to
develop the tools needed for pursuing weak lensing in the radio band. We
identify the key analysis challenges and the key pathfinder experiments that
will allow us to address them in the run up to the SKA. We identify and
summarize the unique and potentially very powerful aspects of radio weak
lensing surveys, facilitated by the SKA, that can solve major challenges in the
field of weak lensing. These include the use of polarization and rotational
velocity information to control intrinsic alignments, and the new area of weak
lensing using intensity mapping experiments. We show how the SKA lensing
surveys will both complement and enhance corresponding efforts in the optical
wavebands through cross-correlation techniques and by way of extending the
reach of weak lensing to high redshift.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.4982 [pdf] - 1178725
The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (GREAT3) Challenge
Handbook
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Bosch, James;
Chang, Chihway;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gill, Mandeep;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kannawadi, Arun;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Lackner, Claire;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Rhodes, Jason;
Simet, Melanie;
Zuntz, Joe;
Armstrong, Bob;
Bridle, Sarah;
Coupon, Jean;
Dietrich, Jörg P.;
Gentile, Marc;
Heymans, Catherine;
Jurling, Alden S.;
Kent, Stephen M.;
Kirkby, David;
Margala, Daniel;
Massey, Richard;
Melchior, Peter;
Peterson, John;
Roodman, Aaron;
Schrabback, Tim
Submitted: 2013-08-22, last modified: 2014-02-28
The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 3 (GREAT3) challenge is the third
in a series of image analysis challenges, with a goal of testing and
facilitating the development of methods for analyzing astronomical images that
will be used to measure weak gravitational lensing. This measurement requires
extremely precise estimation of very small galaxy shape distortions, in the
presence of far larger intrinsic galaxy shapes and distortions due to the
blurring kernel caused by the atmosphere, telescope optics, and instrumental
effects. The GREAT3 challenge is posed to the astronomy, machine learning, and
statistics communities, and includes tests of three specific effects that are
of immediate relevance to upcoming weak lensing surveys, two of which have
never been tested in a community challenge before. These effects include
realistically complex galaxy models based on high-resolution imaging from
space; spatially varying, physically-motivated blurring kernel; and combination
of multiple different exposures. To facilitate entry by people new to the
field, and for use as a diagnostic tool, the simulation software for the
challenge is publicly available, though the exact parameters used for the
challenge are blinded. Sample scripts to analyze the challenge data using
existing methods will also be provided. See http://great3challenge.info and
http://great3.projects.phys.ucl.ac.uk/leaderboard/ for more information.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.5618 [pdf] - 1380644
Probing the accelerating Universe with radio weak lensing in the JVLA
Sky Survey
Brown, M. L.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Amara, A.;
Bacon, D. J.;
Battye, R. A.;
Bell, M. R.;
Beswick, R. J.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Böhm, V.;
Bridle, S.;
Browne, I. W. A.;
Casey, C. M.;
Demetroullas, C.;
Enßlin, T.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Garrington, S. T.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gray, M. E.;
Hales, C. A.;
Harrison, I.;
Heavens, A. F.;
Heymans, C.;
Hung, C. L.;
Jackson, N. J.;
Jarvis, M. J.;
Joachimi, B.;
Kay, S. T.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Maartens, R.;
Miller, L.;
Muxlow, T. W. B.;
Myers, S. T.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Patel, P.;
Pritchard, J. R.;
Raccanelli, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Richards, A. M. S.;
Riseley, C.;
Santos, M. G.;
Scaife, A. M. M.;
Schäfer, B. M.;
Schilizzi, R. T.;
Smail, I.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Szepietowski, R. M.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Whittaker, L.;
Wrigley, N.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2013-12-19, last modified: 2013-12-30
We outline the prospects for performing pioneering radio weak gravitational
lensing analyses using observations from a potential forthcoming JVLA Sky
Survey program. A large-scale survey with the JVLA can offer interesting and
unique opportunities for performing weak lensing studies in the radio band, a
field which has until now been the preserve of optical telescopes. In
particular, the JVLA has the capacity for large, deep radio surveys with
relatively high angular resolution, which are the key characteristics required
for a successful weak lensing study. We highlight the potential advantages and
unique aspects of performing weak lensing in the radio band. In particular, the
inclusion of continuum polarisation information can greatly reduce noise in
weak lensing reconstructions and can also remove the effects of intrinsic
galaxy alignments, the key astrophysical systematic effect that limits weak
lensing at all wavelengths. We identify a VLASS "deep fields" program (total
area ~10-20 square degs), to be conducted at L-band and with high-resolution
(A-array configuration), as the optimal survey strategy from the point of view
of weak lensing science. Such a survey will build on the unique strengths of
the JVLA and will remain unsurpassed in terms of its combination of resolution
and sensitivity until the advent of the Square Kilometre Array. We identify the
best fields on the JVLA-accessible sky from the point of view of overlapping
with existing deep optical and near infra-red data which will provide crucial
redshift information and facilitate a host of additional compelling
multi-wavelength science.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.4663 [pdf] - 1542622
S\'{e}rsic galaxy models in weak lensing shape measurement: model bias,
noise bias and their interaction
Submitted: 2013-08-21
Cosmic shear is a powerful probe of cosmological parameters, but its
potential can be fully utilised only if galaxy shapes are measured with great
accuracy. Two major effects have been identified which are likely to account
for most of the bias for maximum likelihood methods in recent shear measurement
challenges. Model bias occurs when the true galaxy shape is not well
represented by the fitted model. Noise bias occurs due to the non-linear
relationship between image pixels and galaxy shape. In this paper we
investigate the potential interplay between these two effects when an imperfect
model is used in the presence of high noise. We present analytical expressions
for this bias, which depends on the residual difference between the model and
real data. They can lead to biases not accounted for in previous calibration
schemes. By measuring the model bias, noise bias and their interaction, we
provide a complete statistical framework for measuring galaxy shapes with model
fitting methods from GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) like
images. We demonstrate the noise and model interaction bias using a simple toy
model, which indicates that this effect can potentially be significant. Using
real galaxy images from the Cosmological Evolution Survey (COSMOS) we quantify
the strength of the model bias, noise bias and their interaction. We find that
the interaction term is often a similar size to the model bias term, and is
smaller than the requirements of the current and shortly upcoming galaxy
surveys.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.8062 [pdf] - 1542621
Optimising Spectroscopic and Photometric Galaxy Surveys: Same-sky
Benefits for Dark Energy and Modified Gravity
Submitted: 2013-07-30
The combination of multiple cosmological probes can produce measurements of
cosmological parameters much more stringent than those possible with any
individual probe. We examine the combination of two highly correlated probes of
late-time structure growth: (i) weak gravitational lensing from a survey with
photometric redshifts and (ii) galaxy clustering and redshift space distortions
from a survey with spectroscopic redshifts. We choose generic survey designs so
that our results are applicable to a range of current and future photometric
redshift (e.g. KiDS, DES, HSC, Euclid) and spectroscopic redshift (e.g. DESI,
4MOST, Sumire) surveys. Combining the surveys greatly improves their power to
measure both dark energy and modified gravity. An independent, non-overlapping
combination sees a dark energy figure of merit more than 4 times larger than
that produced by either survey alone. The powerful synergies between the
surveys are strongest for modified gravity, where their constraints are
orthogonal, producing a non-overlapping joint figure of merit nearly 2 orders
of magnitude larger than either alone. Our projected angular power spectrum
formalism makes it easy to model the cross-correlation observable when the
surveys overlap on the sky, producing a joint data vector and full covariance
matrix. We calculate a same-sky improvement factor, from the inclusion of these
cross-correlations, relative to non-overlapping surveys. We find nearly a
factor of 4 for dark energy and more than a factor of 2 for modified gravity.
The exact forecast figures of merit and same-sky benefits can be radically
affected by a range of forecasts assumption, which we explore methodically in a
sensitivity analysis. We show that that our fiducial assumptions produce robust
results which give a good average picture of the science return from combining
photometric and spectroscopic surveys.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.5254 [pdf] - 630580
Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
Kitching, T. D.;
Balan, S. T.;
Bridle, S.;
Cantale, N.;
Courbin, F.;
Eifler, T.;
Gentile, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Harmeling, S.;
Heymans, C.;
Hirsch, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirkby, D.;
Margala, D.;
Massey, R. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Nurbaeva, G.;
Patton, K.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rowe, B. T. P.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tewes, M.;
Viola, M.;
Witherick, D.;
Voigt, L.;
Young, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2012-02-23, last modified: 2013-02-25
In this paper we present results from the weak lensing shape measurement
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Galaxy Challenge. This
marks an order of magnitude step change in the level of scrutiny employed in
weak lensing shape measurement analysis. We provide descriptions of each method
tested and include 10 evaluation metrics over 24 simulation branches. GREAT10
was the first shape measurement challenge to include variable fields; both the
shear field and the Point Spread Function (PSF) vary across the images in a
realistic manner. The variable fields enable a variety of metrics that are
inaccessible to constant shear simulations including a direct measure of the
impact of shape measurement inaccuracies, and the impact of PSF size and
ellipticity, on the shear power spectrum. To assess the impact of shape
measurement bias for cosmic shear we present a general pseudo-Cl formalism,
that propagates spatially varying systematics in cosmic shear through to power
spectrum estimates. We also show how one-point estimators of bias can be
extracted from variable shear simulations. The GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
received 95 submissions and saw a factor of 3 improvement in the accuracy
achieved by shape measurement methods. The best methods achieve sub-percent
average biases. We find a strong dependence in accuracy as a function of
signal-to-noise, and indications of a weak dependence on galaxy type and size.
Some requirements for the most ambitious cosmic shear experiments are met above
a signal-to-noise ratio of 20. These results have the caveat that the simulated
PSF was a ground-based PSF. Our results are a snapshot of the accuracy of
current shape measurement methods and are a benchmark upon which improvement
can continue. This provides a foundation for a better understanding of the
strengths and limitations of shape measurement methods.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.0183 [pdf] - 1159437
IM3SHAPE: A maximum-likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic
gravitational lensing
Submitted: 2013-02-01, last modified: 2013-02-04
We present and describe im3shape, a new publicly available galaxy shape
measurement code for weak gravitational lensing shear. im3shape performs a
maximum likelihood fit of a bulge-plus-disc galaxy model to noisy images,
incorporating an applied point spread function. We detail challenges faced and
choices made in its design and implementation, and then discuss various
limitations that affect this and other maximum likelihood methods. We assess
the bias arising from fitting an incorrect galaxy model using simple noise-free
images and find that it should not be a concern for current cosmic shear
surveys.
We test im3shape on the GREAT08 Challenge image simulations, and meet the
requirements for upcoming cosmic shear surveys in the case that the simulations
are encompassed by the fitted model, using a simple correction for image noise
bias. For the fiducial branch of GREAT08 we obtain a negligible additive shear
bias and sub-two percent level multiplicative bias, which is suitable for
analysis of current surveys. We fall short of the sub-percent level requirement
for upcoming surveys, which we attribute to a combination of noise bias and the
mis-match between our galaxy model and the model used in the GREAT08
simulations. We meet the requirements for current surveys across all branches
of GREAT08, except those with small or high noise galaxies, which we would cut
from our analysis. Using the GREAT08 metric we we obtain a score of Q=717 for
the usable branches, relative to the goal of Q=1000 for future experiments. The
code is freely available from https://bitbucket.org/joezuntz/im3shape
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.2451 [pdf] - 562602
The Dark Energy Spectrometer (DESpec): A Multi-Fiber Spectroscopic
Upgrade of the Dark Energy Camera and Survey for the Blanco Telescope
Abdalla, F.;
Annis, J.;
Bacon, D.;
Bridle, S.;
Castander, F.;
Colless, M.;
DePoy, D.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Eriksen, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hogan, C.;
Jouvel, S.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Kron, R.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lawrence, J.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J.;
Mohr, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Sako, M.;
Saunders, W.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R.;
West, A.;
Wu, H.
Submitted: 2012-09-11
We describe an initiative to build and use the Dark Energy Spectrometer
(DESpec), a wide-field spectroscopic survey instrument for the Blanco 4 meter
telescope at Cerro Tololo InterAmerican Observatory (CTIO) in Chile. A new
system with about 4000 robotically positioned optical fibers will be
interchangeable with the CCD imager of the existing Dark Energy Camera (DECam),
accessing a field of view of 3.8 square degrees in a single exposure. The
proposed instrument will be operated by CTIO and available for use by the
astronomy community. Our collaboration proposes to use DESpec to conduct a
wide, deep spectroscopic survey to study Dark Energy. In a survey of about 350
nights, the DESpec collaboration proposes to obtain spectroscopic redshifts for
about 8 million galaxies over 5000 square degrees selected from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES). This Dark Energy Spectroscopic Survey will advance our knowledge
of cosmic expansion and structure growth significantly beyond that obtainable
with imaging-only surveys. Since it adds a spectroscopic third dimension to the
same sky as DES, DESpec will enable increasingly precise techniques to
discriminate among alternative explanations of cosmic acceleration, such as
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.1966 [pdf] - 550545
Future Science Prospects for AMI
Grainge, Keith;
Alexander, Paul;
Battye, Richard;
Birkinshaw, Mark;
Blain, Andrew;
Bremer, Malcolm;
Bridle, Sarah;
Brown, Michael;
Davis, Richard;
Dickinson, Clive;
Edge, Alastair;
Efstathiou, George;
Fender, Robert;
Hardcastle, Martin;
Hatchell, Jennifer;
Hobson, Michael;
Jarvis, Matthew;
Maughan, Benjamin;
McHardy, Ian;
Middleton, Matthew;
Lasenby, Anthony;
Saunders, Richard;
Savini, Giorgio;
Scaife, Anna;
Smith, Graham;
Thompson, Mark;
White, Glenn;
Zarb-Adami, Kris;
Allison, James;
Buckle, Jane;
Castro-Tirado, Alberto;
Chernyakova, Maria;
Deane, Roger;
Feroz, Farhan;
Santos, Ricardo Genova;
Green, David;
Hannikainen, Diana;
Heywood, Ian;
Hurley-Walker, Natasha;
Kneissl, Ruediger;
Koljonen, Karri;
Kulkarni, Shrinivas;
Markoff, Sera;
MacTavish, Carrie;
McCollough, Michael;
Migliari, Simone;
Miller, Jon M.;
Miller-Jones, James;
Olamaie, Malak;
Paragi, Zsolt;
Pearson, Timothy;
Pooley, Guy;
Pottschmidt, Katja;
Rebolo, Rafael;
Richer, John;
Riley, Julia;
Rodriguez, Jerome;
Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, Carmen;
Rushton, Anthony;
Savolainen, Petri;
Scott, Paul;
Shimwell, Timothy;
Tavani, Marco;
Tomsick, John;
Tudose, Valeriu;
van der Heyden, Kurt;
van der Horst, Alexander;
Varlotta, Angelo;
Waldram, Elizabeth;
Wilms, Joern;
Zdziarski, Andrzej;
Zwart, Jonathan;
Perrott, Yvette;
Rumsey, Clare;
Schammel, Michel
Submitted: 2012-08-09, last modified: 2012-08-17
The Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) is a telescope specifically designed
for high sensitivity measurements of low-surface-brightness features at
cm-wavelength and has unique, important capabilities. It consists of two
interferometer arrays operating over 13.5-18 GHz that image structures on
scales of 0.5-10 arcmin with very low systematics. The Small Array (AMI-SA; ten
3.7-m antennas) couples very well to Sunyaev-Zel'dovich features from galaxy
clusters and to many Galactic features. The Large Array (AMI-LA; eight 13-m
antennas) has a collecting area ten times that of the AMI-SA and longer
baselines, crucially allowing the removal of the effects of confusing radio
point sources from regions of low surface-brightness, extended emission.
Moreover AMI provides fast, deep object surveying and allows monitoring of
large numbers of objects. In this White Paper we review the new science - both
Galactic and extragalactic - already achieved with AMI and outline the
prospects for much more.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.5320 [pdf] - 1124327
The impact of camera optical alignments on weak lensing measures for the
Dark Energy Survey
Antonik, Michelle L.;
Bacon, David J.;
Bridle, Sarah;
Doel, Peter;
Brooks, David;
Worswick, Sue;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bernstein, Rebecca;
DePoy, Darren;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Frieman, Joshua A.;
Gladders, Michael;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jarvis, Michael;
Kent, Stephen M.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Roodman, Aaron;
Walker, Alistair R.
Submitted: 2012-06-22
Telescope Point Spread Function (PSF) quality is critical for realising the
potential of cosmic weak lensing observations to constrain dark energy and test
General Relativity. In this paper we use quantitative weak gravitational
lensing measures to inform the precision of lens optical alignment, with
specific reference to the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We compute optics spot
diagrams and calculate the shear and flexion of the PSF as a function of
position on the focal plane. For perfect optical alignment we verify the high
quality of the DES optical design, finding a maximum PSF contribution to the
weak lensing shear of 0.04 near the edge of the focal plane. However this can
be increased by a factor of approximately three if the lenses are only just
aligned within their maximum specified tolerances. We calculate the E and
B-mode shear and flexion variance as a function of de-centre or tilt of each
lens in turn. We find tilt accuracy to be a few times more important than
de-centre, depending on the lens considered. Finally we consider the compound
effect of de-centre and tilt of multiple lenses simultaneously, by sampling
from a plausible range of values of each parameter. We find that the compound
effect can be around twice as detrimental as when considering any one lens
alone. Furthermore, this combined effect changes the conclusions about which
lens is most important to align accurately. For DES, the tilt of the first two
lenses is the most important.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.5049 [pdf] - 1117484
Measurement and Calibration of Noise Bias in Weak Lensing Galaxy Shape
Estimation
Submitted: 2012-03-22
Weak gravitational lensing has the potential to constrain cosmological
parameters to high precision. However, as shown by the Shear TEsting Programmes
(STEP) and GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) Challenges, measuring
galaxy shears is a nontrivial task: various methods introduce different
systematic biases which have to be accounted for. We investigate how pixel
noise on the image affects the bias on shear estimates from a
Maximum-Likelihood forward model-fitting approach using a sum of co-elliptical
S\'{e}rsic profiles, in complement to the theoretical approach of an an
associated paper. We evaluate the bias using a simple but realistic galaxy
model and find that the effects of noise alone can cause biases of order 1-10%
on measured shears, which is significant for current and future lensing
surveys. We evaluate a simulation-based calibration method to create a bias
model as a function of galaxy properties and observing conditions. This model
is then used to correct the simulated measurements. We demonstrate that this
method can effectively reduce noise bias so that shear measurement reaches the
level of accuracy required for estimating cosmic shear in upcoming lensing
surveys.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.5050 [pdf] - 1117485
Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements
Submitted: 2012-03-22
Weak lensing experiments are a powerful probe of cosmology through their
measurement of the mass distribution of the universe. A challenge for this
technique is to control systematic errors that occur when measuring the shapes
of distant galaxies. In this paper we investigate noise bias, a systematic
error that arises from second order noise terms in the shape measurement
process. We first derive analytical expressions for the bias of general Maximum
Likelihood Estimators (MLEs) in the presence of additive noise. We then find
analytical expressions for a simplified toy model in which galaxies are modeled
and fitted with a Gaussian with its size as a single free parameter. Even for
this very simple case we find a significant effect. We also extend our analysis
to a more realistic 6-parameter elliptical Gaussian model. We find that the
noise bias is generically of the order of the inverse-squared signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) of the galaxies and is thus of the order of a percent for galaxies
of SNR of 10, i.e. comparable to the weak lensing shear signal. This is nearly
two orders of magnitude greater than the systematics requirements for future
all-sky weak lensing surveys. We discuss possible ways to circumvent this
effect, including a calibration method using simulations discussed in an
associated paper.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.5912 [pdf] - 1051786
Bayesian analysis of weak gravitational lensing and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich
data for six galaxy clusters
Hurley-Walker, Natasha;
Bridle, Sarah;
Cypriano, Eduardo S.;
Davies, Matthew L.;
Erben, Thomas;
Feroz, Farhan;
Franzen, Thomas M. O.;
Grainge, Keith;
Hobson, Michael P.;
Lasenby, Anthony;
Marshall, P. J.;
Olamaie, Malak;
Pooley, Guy;
Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, Carmen;
Saunders, Richard D. E.;
Scaife, Anna M. M.;
Schammel, Michel P.;
Scott, Paul F.;
Shimwell, Timothy;
Titterington, David;
Waldram, Elizabeth;
Zwart, Jonathan T. L.
Submitted: 2011-01-31, last modified: 2012-01-24
We present an analysis of observations made with the Arcminute Microkelvin
Imager (AMI) and the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) of six galaxy
clusters in a redshift range of 0.16--0.41. The cluster gas is modelled using
the Sunyaev--Zel'dovich (SZ) data provided by AMI, while the total mass is
modelled using the lensing data from the CFHT. In this paper, we: i) find very
good agreement between SZ measurements (assuming large-scale virialisation and
a gas-fraction prior) and lensing measurements of the total cluster masses out
to r_200; ii) perform the first multiple-component weak-lensing analysis of
A115; iii) confirm the unusual separation between the gas and mass components
in A1914; iv) jointly analyse the SZ and lensing data for the relaxed cluster
A611, confirming our use of a simulation-derived mass-temperature relation for
parameterizing measurements of the SZ effect.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.4752 [pdf] - 1092527
The Cosmological Impact of Intrinsic Alignment Model Choice for Cosmic
Shear
Submitted: 2011-12-20
We consider the effect of galaxy intrinsic alignments (IAs) on dark energy
constraints from weak gravitational lensing. We summarise the latest version of
the linear alignment model of IAs, following the brief note of Hirata & Seljak
(2010) and further interpretation in Laszlo et al. (2011). We show the
cosmological bias on the dark energy equation of state parameters w0 and wa
that would occur if IAs were ignored. We find that w0 and wa are both
catastrophically biased, by an absolute value of just greater than unity under
the Fisher matrix approximation. This contrasts with a bias several times
larger for the earlier IA implementation. Therefore there is no doubt that IAs
must be taken into account for future Stage III experiments and beyond. We use
a flexible grid of IA and galaxy bias parameters as used in previous work, and
investigate what would happen if the universe used the latest IA model, but we
assumed the earlier version. We find that despite the large difference between
the two IA models, the grid flexibility is sufficient to remove cosmological
bias and recover the correct dark energy equation of state. In an appendix, we
compare observed shear power spectra to those from a popular previous
implementation and explain the differences.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0779 [pdf] - 445530
Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook
Kitching, Thomas;
Balan, Sreekumar;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bethge, Matthias;
Bridle, Sarah;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gentile, Marc;
Heavens, Alan;
Hirsch, Michael;
Hosseini, Reshad;
Kiessling, Alina;
Amara, Adam;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Nurbaeva, Guldariya;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Rassat, Anais;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schölkopf, Bernhard;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Gill, Mandeep;
Shmakova, Marina;
Taylor, Andy;
Velander, Malin;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Witherick, Dugan;
Wittman, David;
Harmeling, Stefan;
Heymans, Catherine;
Massey, Richard;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Schrabback, Tim;
Voigt, Lisa
Submitted: 2010-09-03, last modified: 2011-11-30
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4536 [pdf] - 1542609
Optimising cosmic shear surveys to measure modifications to gravity on
cosmic scales
Submitted: 2011-09-21, last modified: 2011-10-07
We consider how upcoming photometric large scale structure surveys can be
optimized to measure the properties of dark energy and possible cosmic scale
modifications to General Relativity in light of realistic astrophysical and
instrumental systematic uncertainities. In particular we include flexible
descriptions of intrinsic alignments, galaxy bias and photometric redshift
uncertainties in a Fisher Matrix analysis of shear, position and position-shear
correlations, including complementary cosmological constraints from the CMB. We
study the impact of survey tradeoffs in depth versus breadth, and redshift
quality. We parameterise the results in terms of the Dark Energy Task Force
figure of merit, and deviations from General Relativity through an analagous
Modified Gravity figure of merit. We find that intrinsic alignments weaken the
dependence of figure of merit on area and that, for a fixed observing time, a
fiducial Stage IV survey plateaus above roughly 10,000deg2 for DE and peaks at
about 5,000deg2 as the relative importance of IAs at low redshift penalises
wide, shallow surveys. While reducing photometric redshift scatter improves
constraining power, the dependence is shallow. The variation in constraining
power is stronger once IAs are included and is slightly more pronounced for MG
constraints than for DE. The inclusion of intrinsic alignments and galaxy
position information reduces the required prior on photometric redshift
accuracy by an order of magnitude for both the fiducial Stage III and IV
surveys, equivalent to a factor of 100 reduction in the number of spectroscopic
galaxies required to calibrate the photometric sample.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4535 [pdf] - 1084277
Disentangling dark energy and cosmic tests of gravity from weak lensing
systematics
Submitted: 2011-09-21
We consider the impact of key astrophysical and measurement systematics on
constraints on dark energy and modifications to gravity on cosmic scales. We
focus on upcoming photometric "Stage III" and "Stage IV" large scale structure
surveys such as DES, SuMIRe, Euclid, LSST and WFIRST. We illustrate the
different redshift dependencies of gravity modifications compared to intrinsic
alignments, the main astrophysical systematic. The way in which systematic
uncertainties, such as galaxy bias and intrinsic alignments, are modelled can
change dark energy equation of state and modified gravity figures of merit by a
factor of four. The inclusion of cross-correlations of cosmic shear and galaxy
position measurements helps reduce the loss of constraining power from the
lensing shear surveys. When forecasts for Planck CMB and Stage IV surveys are
combined, constraints on the dark energy equation of state and modified gravity
model are recovered, relative to those from shear data with no systematic
uncertainties, if fewer than 36 free parameters in total are used to describe
the galaxy bias and intrinsic alignment models as a function of scale and
redshift. To facilitate future investigations, we also provide a fitting
function for the matter power spectrum arising from the phenomenological
modified gravity model we consider.
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.3491 [pdf] - 391978
Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys
using the MegaZ-LRG sample
Submitted: 2010-08-20, last modified: 2011-07-29
Correlations between the intrinsic shapes of galaxies and the large-scale
galaxy density field provide an important tool to investigate galaxy intrinsic
alignments, which constitute a major astrophysical systematic in cosmological
weak lensing (cosmic shear) surveys, but also yield insight into the formation
and evolution of galaxies. We measure galaxy position-shape correlations in the
MegaZ-LRG sample for more than 800,000 luminous red galaxies, making the first
such measurement with a photometric redshift sample. In combination with a
re-analysis of several spectroscopic SDSS samples, we constrain an intrinsic
alignment model for early-type galaxies over long baselines in redshift (z ~
0.7) and luminosity (4mag). We develop and test the formalism to incorporate
photometric redshift scatter in the modelling. For r_p > 6 Mpc/h, the fits to
galaxy position-shape correlation functions are consistent with the scaling
with r_p and redshift of a revised, nonlinear version of the linear alignment
model for all samples. An extra redshift dependence proportional to (1+z)^n is
constrained to n=-0.3+/-0.8 (1sigma). To obtain consistent amplitudes for all
data, an additional dependence on galaxy luminosity proportional to L^b with
b=1.1+0.3-0.2 is required. The normalisation of the intrinsic alignment power
spectrum is found to be (0.077 +/- 0.008)/rho_{cr} for galaxies at redshift 0.3
and r band magnitude of -22 (k- and evolution-corrected to z=0). Assuming zero
intrinsic alignments for blue galaxies, we assess the bias on cosmological
parameters for a tomographic CFHTLS-like lensing survey. Both the resulting
mean bias and its uncertainty are smaller than the 1sigma statistical errors
when using the constraints from all samples combined. The addition of MegaZ-LRG
data reduces the uncertainty in intrinsic alignment bias on cosmological
parameters by factors of three to seven. (abridged)
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.5595 [pdf] - 1076923
The impact of galaxy colour gradients on cosmic shear measurement
Submitted: 2011-05-27
Cosmic shear has been identified as the method with the most potential to
constrain dark energy. To capitalise on this potential it is necessary to
measure galaxy shapes with great accuracy, which in turn requires a detailed
model for the image blurring, the Point Spread Function (PSF). In general the
PSF varies with wavelength and therefore the PSF integrated over an observing
filter depends on the spectrum of the object. For a typical galaxy the spectrum
varies across the galaxy image, thus the PSF depends on the position within the
image. We estimate the bias on the shear due to such colour gradients by
modelling galaxies using two co-centered, co-elliptical Sersic profiles, each
with a different spectrum. We estimate the effect of ignoring colour gradients
and find the shear bias from a single galaxy can be very large depending on the
properties of the galaxy. We find that halving the filter width reduces the
shear bias by a factor of about 5. We show that, to first order, tomographic
cosmic shear two point statistics depend on the mean shear bias over the galaxy
population at a given redshift. For a single broad filter, and averaging over a
small galaxy catalogue, we find a mean shear bias which is subdominant to the
predicted statistical errors for future cosmic shear surveys. However, the true
mean shear bias may exceed the statistical errors, depending on how accurately
the catalogue represents the observed distribution of galaxies in the cosmic
shear survey. We then investigate the bias on the shear for two-filter imaging
and find that the bias is reduced by at least an order of magnitude. Lastly, we
find that it is possible to calibrate galaxies for which colour gradients were
ignored using two-filter imaging of a fair sample of noisy galaxies, if the
galaxy model is known. For a S/N of 25 the number of galaxies required in each
tomographic redshift bin is of order 1e4.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0218 [pdf] - 300252
Constraining warm dark matter with cosmic shear power spectra
Submitted: 2010-09-01, last modified: 2011-01-24
We investigate potential constraints from cosmic shear on the dark matter
particle mass, assuming all dark matter is made up of light thermal relic
particles. Given the theoretical uncertainties involved in making cosmological
predictions in such warm dark matter scenarios we use analytical fits to linear
warm dark matter power spectra and compare (i) the halo model using a mass
function evaluated from these linear power spectra and (ii) an analytical fit
to the non-linear evolution of the linear power spectra. We optimistically
ignore the competing effect of baryons for this work. We find approach (ii) to
be conservative compared to approach (i). We evaluate cosmological constraints
using these methods, marginalising over four other cosmological parameters.
Using the more conservative method we find that a Euclid-like weak lensing
survey together with constraints from the Planck cosmic microwave background
mission primary anisotropies could achieve a lower limit on the particle mass
of 2.5 keV.
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.2454 [pdf] - 1018343
Simultaneous measurement of cosmology and intrinsic alignments using
joint cosmic shear and galaxy number density correlations
Submitted: 2009-11-12, last modified: 2010-11-29
Cosmic shear is a powerful method to constrain cosmology, provided that any
systematic effects are under control. The intrinsic alignment of galaxies is
expected to severely bias parameter estimates if not taken into account. We
explore the potential of a joint analysis of tomographic galaxy ellipticity,
galaxy number density, and ellipticity-number density cross-correlations to
simultaneously constrain cosmology and self-calibrate unknown intrinsic
alignment and galaxy bias contributions. We treat intrinsic alignments and
galaxy biasing as free functions of scale and redshift and marginalise over the
resulting parameter sets. Constraints on cosmology are calculated by combining
the likelihoods from all two-point correlations between galaxy ellipticity and
galaxy number density. The information required for these calculations is
already available in a standard cosmic shear dataset. We include contributions
to these functions from cosmic shear, intrinsic alignments, galaxy clustering
and magnification effects. In a Fisher matrix analysis we compare our
constraints with those from cosmic shear alone in the absence of intrinsic
alignments. For a potential future large area survey, such as Euclid, the extra
information from the additional correlation functions can make up for the
additional free parameters in the intrinsic alignment and galaxy bias terms,
depending on the flexibility in the models. For example, the Dark Energy Task
Force figure of merit is recovered even when more than 100 free parameters are
marginalised over. We find that the redshift quality requirements are similar
to those calculated in the absence of intrinsic alignments.
[68]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.5347 [pdf] - 1018537
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Direct constraints on blue galaxy
intrinsic alignments at intermediate redshifts
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Blake, Chris;
Bridle, Sarah;
Abdalla, Filipe B.;
Brough, Sarah;
Colless, Matthew;
Couch, Warrick;
Croom, Scott;
Davis, Tamara;
Drinkwater, Michael J.;
Forster, Karl;
Glazebrook, Karl;
Jelliffe, Ben;
Jurek, Russell J.;
Li, I-hui;
Madore, Barry;
Martin, Chris;
Pimbblet, Kevin;
Poole, Gregory B.;
Pracy, Michael;
Sharp, Rob;
Wisnioski, Emily;
Woods, David;
Wyder, Ted
Submitted: 2009-11-27, last modified: 2010-08-04
Correlations between the intrinsic shapes of galaxy pairs, and between the
intrinsic shapes of galaxies and the large-scale density field, may be induced
by tidal fields. These correlations, which have been detected at low redshifts
(z<0.35) for bright red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and
for which upper limits exist for blue galaxies at z~0.1, provide a window into
galaxy formation and evolution, and are also an important contaminant for
current and future weak lensing surveys. Measurements of these alignments at
intermediate redshifts (z~0.6) that are more relevant for cosmic shear
observations are very important for understanding the origin and redshift
evolution of these alignments, and for minimising their impact on weak lensing
measurements. We present the first such intermediate-redshift measurement for
blue galaxies, using galaxy shape measurements from SDSS and spectroscopic
redshifts from the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. Our null detection allows us to
place upper limits on the contamination of weak lensing measurements by blue
galaxy intrinsic alignments that, for the first time, do not require
significant model-dependent extrapolation from the z~0.1 SDSS observations.
Also, combining the SDSS and WiggleZ constraints gives us a long redshift
baseline with which to constrain intrinsic alignment models and contamination
of the cosmic shear power spectrum. Assuming that the alignments can be
explained by linear alignment with the smoothed local density field, we find
that a measurement of \sigma_8 in a blue-galaxy dominated, CFHTLS-like survey
would be contaminated by at most +/-0.02 (95% confidence level, SDSS and
WiggleZ) or +/-0.03 (WiggleZ alone) due to intrinsic alignments. [Abridged]
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0759 [pdf] - 1019010
Cosmic shear requirements on the wavelength-dependence of telescope
point spread functions
Submitted: 2010-01-05, last modified: 2010-02-02
Cosmic shear requires high precision measurement of galaxy shapes in the
presence of the observational Point Spread Function (PSF) that smears out the
image. The PSF must therefore be known for each galaxy to a high accuracy.
However, for several reasons, the PSF is usually wavelength dependent,
therefore the differences between the spectral energy distribution of the
observed objects introduces further complexity. In this paper we investigate
the effect of the wavelength-dependence of the PSF, focusing on instruments in
which the PSF size is dominated by the diffraction-limit of the telescope and
which use broad-band filters for shape measurement.
We first calculate biases on cosmological parameter estimation from cosmic
shear when the stellar PSF is used uncorrected. Using realistic galaxy and star
spectral energy distributions and populations and a simple three-component
circular PSF we find that the colour-dependence must be taken into account for
the next generation of telescopes. We then consider two different methods for
removing the effect (i) the use of stars of the same colour as the galaxies and
(ii) estimation of the galaxy spectral energy distribution using multiple
colours and using a telescope model for the PSF. We find that both of these
methods correct the effect to levels below the tolerances required for per-cent
level measurements of dark energy parameters. Comparison of the two methods
favours the template-fitting method because its efficiency is less dependent on
galaxy redshift than the broad-band colour method and takes full advantage of
deeper photometry.
[70]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.3787 [pdf] - 1024747
The Impact of Intrinsic Alignments: Cosmological Constraints from a
Joint Analysis of Cosmic Shear and Galaxy Survey Data
Submitted: 2010-01-21
Constraints on cosmology from recent cosmic shear observations are becoming
increasingly sophisticated in their treatment of potential systematic effects.
Here we present cosmological constraints which include modelling of intrinsic
alignments. We demonstrate how the results are changed for three different
intrinsic alignment models, and for two different models of the cosmic shear
galaxy population. We find that intrinsic alignments can either reduce or
increase measurements of the fluctuation amplitude parameter sigma_8 depending
on these decisions, and depending on the cosmic shear survey properties. This
is due to the interplay between the two types of intrinsic alignment, II and
GI. It has been shown that future surveys must make a careful treatment of
intrinsic alignments to avoid significant biases, and that simultaneous
constraints from shear-shear and shear-position correlation functions can
mitigate the effects. For the first time we here combine constraints from
cosmic shear surveys (shear-shear correlations) with those from "GI" intrinsic
alignment data sets (shear-position correlations). We produce updated
constraints on cosmology marginalised over two free parameters in the halo
model for intrinsic alignments. We find that the additional freedom is well
compensated by the additional information, in that the constraints are very
similar indeed to those obtained when intrinsic alignments are ignored, both in
terms of best fit values and uncertainties.
[71]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.0945 [pdf] - 1003324
Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for
cosmological lensing
Bridle, Sarah;
Balan, Sreekumar T.;
Bethge, Matthias;
Gentile, Marc;
Harmeling, Stefan;
Heymans, Catherine;
Hirsch, Michael;
Hosseini, Reshad;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kitching, Thomas;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Lewis, Antony;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Scholkopf, Bernhard;
Velander, Malin;
Voigt, Lisa;
Witherick, Dugan;
Amara, Adam;
Bernstein, Gary;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gill, Mandeep;
Heavens, Alan;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Massey, Richard;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Rassat, Anais;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schrabback, Tim;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Shmakova, Marina;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Wittman, David
Submitted: 2009-08-07
We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge
to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary
goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers
outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were
presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted
results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million
simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, point-spread function
ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations
allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy
suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first
time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter
space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A
number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a
re-examination of the process of combining information from different galaxies,
which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image
simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges,
meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional
developments in shear measurement algorithms.
[72]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.2185 [pdf] - 23330
Shear-Selected Clusters From the Deep Lens Survey III: Masses from Weak
Lensing
Submitted: 2009-04-14, last modified: 2009-07-13
We present weak lensing mass estimates of seven shear-selected galaxy cluster
candidates from the Deep Lens Survey. The clusters were previously identified
as mass peaks in convergence maps of 8.6 sq. deg of R band imaging, and
followed up with X-ray and spectroscopic confirmation, spanning a redshift
range 0.19 - 0.68. Most clusters contained multiple X-ray peaks, yielding 17
total mass concentrations. In this paper, we constrain the masses of these
X-ray sources with weak lensing, using photometric redshifts from the full set
of BVRz' imaging to properly weight background galaxies according to their
lensing distance ratios. We fit both NFW and singular isothermal sphere
profiles, and find that the results are insensitive to the assumed profile. We
also show that the results do not depend significantly on the assumed prior on
the position of the mass peak, but that this may become an issue in future
larger samples. The inferred velocity dispersions for the extended X-ray
sources range from 250-800 km/s, with the exception of one source for which no
lensing signal was found. This work further establishes shear selection as a
viable technique for finding clusters, but also highlights some unresolved
issues such as determination of the mass profile center without biasing the
mass estimate, and fully accounting for line-of-sight projections. A follow-up
paper will examine the mass-X-ray scaling relations of these clusters.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.1214 [pdf] - 9903
Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for
cosmological lensing
Bridle, Sarah;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Amara, Adam;
Applegate, Douglas;
Balan, Sreekumar T.;
Berge, Joel;
Bernstein, Gary;
Dahle, Hakon;
Erben, Thomas;
Gill, Mandeep;
Heavens, Alan;
Heymans, Catherine;
High, F. William;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kitching, Thomas;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Lagatutta, David;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Massey, Richard;
Mellier, Yannick;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Moudden, Yassir;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Pires, Sandrine;
Rassat, Anais;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schrabback, Tim;
Semboloni, Elisabetta;
Shmakova, Marina;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Witherick, Dugan;
Voigt, Lisa;
Wittman, David
Submitted: 2008-02-11, last modified: 2009-06-15
The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2008 (GREAT08) Challenge focuses
on a problem that is of crucial importance for future observations in
cosmology. The shapes of distant galaxies can be used to determine the
properties of dark energy and the nature of gravity, because light from those
galaxies is bent by gravity from the intervening dark matter. The observed
galaxy images appear distorted, although only slightly, and their shapes must
be precisely disentangled from the effects of pixelisation, convolution and
noise. The worldwide gravitational lensing community has made significant
progress in techniques to measure these distortions via the Shear TEsting
Program (STEP). Via STEP, we have run challenges within our own community, and
come to recognise that this particular image analysis problem is ideally
matched to experts in statistical inference, inverse problems and computational
learning. Thus, in order to continue the progress seen in recent years, we are
seeking an infusion of new ideas from these communities. This document details
the GREAT08 Challenge for potential participants. Please visit
http://www.great08challenge.info for the latest information.
[74]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.4801 [pdf] - 1002392
Limitations of model fitting methods for lensing shear estimation
Submitted: 2009-05-29
Gravitational lensing shear has the potential to be the most powerful tool
for constraining the nature of dark energy. However, accurate measurement of
galaxy shear is crucial and has been shown to be non-trivial by the Shear
TEsting Programme. Here we demonstrate a fundamental limit to the accuracy
achievable by model-fitting techniques, if oversimplistic models are used. We
show that even if galaxies have elliptical isophotes, model-fitting methods
which assume elliptical isophotes can have significant biases if they use the
wrong profile. We use noise-free simulations to show that on allowing
sufficient flexibility in the profile the biases can be made negligible. This
is no longer the case if elliptical isophote models are used to fit galaxies
made up of a bulge plus a disk, if these two components have different
ellipticities. The limiting accuracy is dependent on the galaxy shape but we
find the most significant biases for simple spiral-like galaxies. The
implications for a given cosmic shear survey will depend on the actual
distribution of galaxy morphologies in the universe, taking into account the
survey selection function and the point spread function. However our results
suggest that the impact on cosmic shear results from current and near future
surveys may be negligible. Meanwhile, these results should encourage the
development of existing approaches which are less sensitive to morphology, as
well as methods which use priors on galaxy shapes learnt from deep surveys.
[75]
oai:arXiv.org:0806.2723 [pdf] - 314960
A Detection of Dark Matter Halo Ellipticity using Galaxy Cluster Lensing
in SDSS
Submitted: 2008-06-17, last modified: 2009-03-30
We measure the ellipticity of isolated clusters of galaxies in the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) using gravitational lensing. We stack the clusters,
rotating so that the major axes of the ellipses determined by the positions of
cluster member galaxies are aligned. We exclude the signal from the central 0.5
h^-1 Mpc to avoid problems with stacking alignment and cluster member
contamination. We fit an elliptical NFW profile and find an axis ratio for the
dark matter of f = b/a = 0.48+0.14-0.09 (1 sigma), and rule out f=1 at 99.6 per
cent confidence thus ruling out a spherical halo. We find that the ellipticity
of the cluster galaxy distribution is consistent with being equal to the dark
matter ellipticity. The results are similar if we change the isolation
criterion by 50 per cent in either direction.
[76]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.3870 [pdf] - 1001724
A halo model for intrinsic alignments of galaxy ellipticities
Submitted: 2009-03-23
Correlations between intrinsic ellipticities of galaxies are a potentially
important systematic error when constraining dark energy properties from weak
gravitational lensing (cosmic shear) surveys. In the absence of perfectly known
galaxy redshifts some modeling of the galaxy intrinsic alignments is likely to
be required to extract the lensing signal to sufficient accuracy. We present a
new model based on the placement of galaxies into dark matter halos. The
central galaxy ellipticity follows the large scale potential and, in the
simplest case, the satellite galaxies point at the halo center. The two-halo
term is then dominated by the linear alignment model and the one-halo term
provides a motivated extension of intrinsic alignment models to small scales.
We provide fitting formulae for the spatial projected source power spectra for
both intrinsic-intrinsic (II) and shear-intrinsic (GI) correlations. We
illustrate the potential impact of ignoring intrinsic alignments on
cosmological parameter constraints from non-tomographic surveys, finding that
sigma_8 could be underestimated by up to the size of the current 1-sigma error
bar from cosmic shear if very small scales are included in the analysis.
Finally, we highlight areas of interest for numerical simulations of dark
matter clustering and galaxy formation that can further constrain the intrinsic
alignment signal.
[77]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.3938 [pdf] - 1001727
Gravitational Flexion by Elliptical Dark Matter Haloes
Submitted: 2009-03-23
We present equations for the gravitational lensing flexion expected for an
elliptical lens mass distribution. These can be reduced to one-dimensional
finite integrals, thus saving significant computing time over a full
two-dimensional calculation. We estimate constraints on galaxy halo
ellipticities for a range of potential future surveys, finding that the
constraints from the two different types of flexion are comparable and are up
to two orders of magnitude tighter than those from shear. Flexion therefore
appears to be a very promising potential tool for constraining the shapes of
galaxy haloes from future surveys.
[78]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.1935 [pdf] - 10063
Peculiar Velocities into the Next Generation: Cosmological Parameters
From Large Surveys without Bias from Nonlinear Structure
Submitted: 2008-02-13, last modified: 2008-11-03
We investigate methods to best estimate the normalisation of the mass density
fluctuation power spectrum (sigma_8) using peculiar velocity data from a survey
like the Six degree Field Galaxy Velocity Survey (6dFGSv). We focus on two
potential problems (i) biases from nonlinear growth of structure and (ii) the
large number of velocities in the survey. Simulations of LambdaCDM-like models
are used to test the methods. We calculate the likelihood from a full
covariance matrix of velocities averaged in grid cells. This simultaneously
reduces the number of data points and smooths out nonlinearities which tend to
dominate on small scales. We show how the averaging can be taken into account
in the predictions in a practical way, and show the effect of the choice of
cell size. We find that a cell size can be chosen that significantly reduces
the nonlinearities without significantly increasing the error bars on
cosmological parameters. We compare our results with those from a principal
components analysis following Watkins et al (2002) and Feldman et al (2003) to
select a set of optimal moments constructed from linear combinations of the
peculiar velocities that are least sensitive to the nonlinear scales. We
conclude that averaging in grid cells performs equally well. We find that for a
survey such as 6dFGSv we can estimate sigma_8 with less than 3% bias from
nonlinearities. The expected error on sigma_8 after marginalising over Omega_m
is approximately 16 percent.
[79]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.4886 [pdf] - 7570
PSF calibration requirements for dark energy from cosmic shear
Submitted: 2007-11-30, last modified: 2008-04-28
The control of systematic effects when measuring galaxy shapes is one of the
main challenges for cosmic shear analyses. In this context, we study the
fundamental limitations on shear accuracy due to the measurement of the Point
Spread Function (PSF) from the finite number of stars. In order to do that, we
translate the accuracy required for cosmological parameter estimation to the
minimum number of stars over which the PSF must be calibrated. We first derive
our results analytically in the case of infinitely small pixels (i.e.
infinitely high resolution). Then image simulations are used to validate these
results and investigate the effect of finite pixel size in the case of an
elliptical gaussian PSF. Our results are expressed in terms of the minimum
number of stars required to calibrate the PSF in order to ensure that
systematic errors are smaller than statistical errors when estimating the
cosmological parameters. On scales smaller than the area containing this
minimum number of stars, there is not enough information to model the PSF. In
the case of an elliptical gaussian PSF and in the absence of dithering, 2
pixels per PSF Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) implies a 20% increase of the
minimum number of stars compared to the ideal case of infinitely small pixels;
0.9 pixels per PSF FWHM implies a factor 100 increase. In the case of a good
resolution and a typical Signal-to-Noise Ratio distribution of stars, we find
that current surveys need the PSF to be calibrated over a few stars, which may
explain residual systematics on scales smaller than a few arcmins. Future
all-sky cosmic shear surveys require the PSF to be calibrated over a region
containing about 50 stars.
[80]
oai:arXiv.org:0705.0166 [pdf] - 913
Dark energy constraints from cosmic shear power spectra: impact of
intrinsic alignments on photometric redshift requirements
Submitted: 2007-05-01, last modified: 2008-04-18
Cosmic shear constrains cosmology by exploiting the apparent alignments of
pairs of galaxies due to gravitational lensing by intervening mass clumps.
However galaxies may become (intrinsically) aligned with each other, and with
nearby mass clumps, during their formation. This effect needs to be
disentangled from the cosmic shear signal to place constraints on cosmology. We
use the linear intrinsic alignment model as a base and compare it to an
alternative model and data. If intrinsic alignments are ignored then the dark
energy equation of state is biased by ~50 per cent. We examine how the number
of tomographic redshift bins affects uncertainties on cosmological parameters
and find that when intrinsic alignments are included two or more times as many
bins are required to obtain 80 per cent of the available information. We
investigate how the degradation in the dark energy figure of merit depends on
the photometric redshift scatter. Previous studies have shown that lensing does
not place stringent requirements on the photometric redshift uncertainty, so
long as the uncertainty is well known. However, if intrinsic alignments are
included the requirements become a factor of three tighter. These results are
quite insensitive to the fraction of catastrophic outliers, assuming that this
fraction is well known. We show the effect of uncertainties in photometric
redshift bias and scatter. Finally we quantify how priors on the intrinsic
alignment model would improve dark energy constraints.
[81]
oai:arXiv.org:0705.0163 [pdf] - 910
Probing dark energy with cluster counts and cosmic shear power spectra:
including the full covariance
Submitted: 2007-05-02, last modified: 2007-09-22
(Abridged) Combining cosmic shear power spectra and cluster counts is
powerful to improve cosmological parameter constraints and/or test inherent
systematics. However they probe the same cosmic mass density field, if the two
are drawn from the same survey region, and therefore the combination may be
less powerful than first thought. We investigate the cross-covariance between
the cosmic shear power spectra and the cluster counts based on the halo model
approach, where the cross-covariance arises from the three-point correlations
of the underlying mass density field. Fully taking into account the
cross-covariance as well as non-Gaussian errors on the lensing power spectrum
covariance, we find a significant cross-correlation between the lensing power
spectrum signals at multipoles l~10^3 and the cluster counts containing halos
with masses M>10^{14}Msun. Including the cross-covariance for the combined
measurement degrades and in some cases improves the total signal-to-noise
ratios up to plus or minus 20% relative to when the two are independent. For
cosmological parameter determination, the cross-covariance has a smaller effect
as a result of working in a multi-dimensional parameter space, implying that
the two observables can be considered independent to a good approximation. We
also discuss that cluster count experiments using lensing-selected mass peaks
could be more complementary to cosmic shear tomography than mass-selected
cluster counts of the corresponding mass threshold. Using lensing selected
clusters with a realistic usable detection threshold (S/N~6 for a ground-based
survey), the uncertainty on each dark energy parameter may be roughly halved by
the combined experiments, relative to using the power spectra alone.
[82]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608002 [pdf] - 83879
The galaxy-galaxy lensing contribution to the cosmic shear two point
function
Submitted: 2006-08-01, last modified: 2007-05-01
We note that galaxy-galaxy lensing by non-spherical galaxy halos produces a
net anti-correlation between the shear of background galaxies and the
ellipticity of foreground galaxies. This anti-correlation would contaminate the
tomographic cosmic shear two point function if the effect were not taken into
account. We compare the size of the galaxy-galaxy lensing contribution to the
change in the cosmic shear two-point correlation function due to a change in
the dark energy equation of state w of 1%. We find them comparable on scales
<~5 arcmin for NFW galaxy profiles, and out to much larger scales for SIE
profiles. However the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal has a characteristic spatial
and redshift pattern which should allow it to be removed.
[83]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605303 [pdf] - 81991
Cosmological baryonic and matter densities from 600,000 SDSS Luminous
Red Galaxies with photometric redshifts
Submitted: 2006-05-11, last modified: 2006-11-09
We analyze MegaZ-LRG, a photometric-redshift catalogue of Luminous Red
Galaxies (LRGs) based on the imaging data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
(SDSS) 4th Data Release. MegaZ-LRG, presented in a companion paper, contains
10^6 photometric redshifts derived with ANNz, an Artificial Neural Network
method, constrained by a spectroscopic sub-sample of 13,000 galaxies obtained
by the 2dF-SDSS LRG and Quasar (2SLAQ) survey. The catalogue spans the redshift
range 0.4 < z < 0.7 with an r.m.s. redshift error ~ 0.03(1+z), covering 5,914
deg^2 to map out a total cosmic volume 2.5 h^-3 Gpc^3. In this study we use the
most reliable 600,000 photometric redshifts to present the first cosmological
parameter fits to galaxy angular power spectra from a photometric redshift
survey. Combining the redshift slices with appropriate covariances, we
determine best-fitting values for the matter and baryon densities of Omega_m h
= 0.195 +/- 0.023 and Omega_b/Omega_m = 0.16 +/- 0.036 (with the Hubble
parameter h = 0.75 and scalar index of primordial fluctuations n = 1 held
fixed). These results are in agreement with and independent of the latest
studies of the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, and their precision is
comparable to analyses of contemporary spectroscopic-redshift surveys. We
perform an extensive series of tests which conclude that our power spectrum
measurements are robust against potential systematic photometric errors in the
catalogue. We conclude that photometric-redshift surveys are competitive with
spectroscopic surveys for measuring cosmological parameters in the simplest
vanilla models. Future deep imaging surveys have great potential for further
improvement, provided that systematic errors can be controlled.
[84]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608643 [pdf] - 84520
The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak
lensing analyses
Massey, Richard;
Heymans, Catherine;
Berge, Joel;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bridle, Sarah;
Clowe, Douglas;
Dahle, Hakon;
Ellis, Richard;
Erben, Thomas;
Hetterscheidt, Marco;
High, F. William;
Hirata, Christopher;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Hudelot, Patrick;
Jarvis, Mike;
Johnston, David;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Margoniner, Vera;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Mellier, Yannick;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Peeples, Molly;
Roat, Chris;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schrabback, Tim;
Schirmer, Mischa;
Seljak, Uros;
Semboloni, Elisabetta;
Van Waerbeke, Ludovic
Submitted: 2006-08-29, last modified: 2006-09-12
The Shear TEsting Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the
accuracy and reliability of weak lensing measurement, in preparation for the
next generation of wide-field surveys. We review sixteen current and emerging
shear measurement methods in a common language, and assess their performance by
running them (blindly) on simulated images that contain a known shear signal.
We determine the common features of algorithms that most successfully recover
the input parameters. We achieve previously unattained discriminatory precision
in our analysis, via a combination of more extensive simulations, and pairs of
galaxy images that have been rotated with respect to each other, thus removing
noise from their intrinsic ellipticities. The robustness of our simulation
approach is also confirmed by testing the relative calibration of methods on
real data.
Weak lensing measurement has improved since the first STEP paper. Several
methods now consistently achieve better than 2% precision, and are still being
developed. However, the simulations can now distinguish all methods from
perfect performance. Our main concern continues to be the potential for a
multiplicative shear calibration bias: not least because this can not be
internally calibrated with real data. We determine which galaxy populations are
responsible and, by adjusting the simulated observing conditions, we also
investigate the effects of instrumental and atmospheric parameters. We have
isolated several previously unrecognised aspects of galaxy shape measurement,
in which focussed development could provide further progress towards the
sub-percent level of precision desired for future surveys.
[ABRIDGED]
[85]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0602213 [pdf] - 79789
The Redshift Sensitivities of Dark Energy Surveys
Submitted: 2006-02-10, last modified: 2006-04-08
Great uncertainty surrounds dark energy, both in terms of its physics, and
the choice of methods by which the problem should be addressed. Here we
quantify the redshift sensitivities offered by different techniques. We focus
on the three methods most adept at constraining w, namely supernovae, cosmic
shear, and baryon oscillations. For each we provide insight into the family of
w(z) models which are permitted for a particular constraint on either w=w0 or
w=w0+wa(1-a). Our results are in the form of "weight functions", which describe
the fitted model parameters as a weighted average over the true functional
form. For example, we find the recent best-fit from the Supernovae Legacy
Survey (w=-1.023) corresponds to the average value of w(z) over the range
0<z<0.4. Whilst there is a strong dependence on the choice of priors, each
cosmological probe displays distinctive characteristics in their redshift
sensitivities. In the case of proposed future surveys, a SNAP-like supernova
survey probes a mean redshift of z ~ 0.3, with baryon oscillations and cosmic
shear at z ~ 0.6. If we consider the evolution of w, sensitivities shift to
slightly higher redshift. Finally, we find that the weight functions may be
expressed as a weighted average of the popular "principal components".
[86]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0506112 [pdf] - 73512
The Shear TEsting Programme 1: Weak lensing analysis of simulated
ground-based observations
Heymans, Catherine;
Van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Bacon, David;
Berge, Joel;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bridle, Sarah;
Brown, Michael L.;
Clowe, Douglas;
Dahle, Haakon;
Erben, Thomas;
Gray, Meghan;
Hetterscheidt, Marco;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Hudelot, Patrick;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Margoniner, Vera;
Massey, Richard;
Mellier, Yannick;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schrabback, Tim;
Wittman, David
Submitted: 2005-06-06, last modified: 2006-02-09
The Shear TEsting Programme, STEP, is a collaborative project to improve the
accuracy and reliability of all weak lensing measurements in preparation for
the next generation of wide-field surveys. In this first STEP paper we present
the results of a blind analysis of simulated ground-based observations of
relatively simple galaxy morphologies. The most successful methods are shown to
achieve percent level accuracy. From the cosmic shear pipelines that have been
used to constrain cosmology, we find weak lensing shear measured to an accuracy
that is within the statistical errors of current weak lensing analyses, with
shear measurements accurate to better than 7%. The dominant source of
measurement error is shown to arise from calibration uncertainties where the
measured shear is over or under-estimated by a constant multiplicative factor.
This is of concern as calibration errors cannot be detected through standard
diagnostic tests. The measured calibration errors appear to result from stellar
contamination, false object detection, the shear measurement method itself,
selection bias and/or the use of biased weights. Additive systematics (false
detections of shear) resulting from residual point-spread function anisotropy
are, in most cases, reduced to below an equivalent shear of 0.001, an order of
magnitude below cosmic shear distortions on the scales probed by current
surveys.
Our results provide a snapshot view of the accuracy of current ground-based
weak lensing methods and a benchmark upon which we can improve. To this end we
provide descriptions of each method tested and include details of the eight
different implementations of the commonly used Kaiser, Squires and Broadhurst
(1995) method (KSB+) to aid the improvement of future KSB+ analyses.
[87]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510195 [pdf] - 76691
Constraining Dark Energy with the Dark Energy Survey: Theoretical
Challenges
Annis, James;
Bridle, Sarah;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Evrard, August E.;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Joshua A.;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Kravtsov, Andrey V.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lin, Huan;
Mohr, Joseph;
Stebbins, Albert;
Walker, Terence P.;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Weinberg, David H.;
Weller, Jochen
Submitted: 2005-10-06
The Dark Energy Survey (DES) will use a new imaging camera on the Blanco 4-m
telescope at CTIO to image 5000 square degrees of sky in the South Galactic Cap
in four optical bands, and to carry out repeat imaging over a smaller area to
identify and measure lightcurves of Type Ia supernovae. The main imaging area
overlaps the planned Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey of the South Pole Telescope. The
idea behind DES is to use four distinct and largely independent methods to
probe the properties of dark energy: baryon oscillations of the power spectrum,
abundance and spatial distribution of clusters, weak gravitational lensing, and
Type Ia supernovae. This white paper outlines, in broad terms, some of the
theoretical issues associated with the first three of these probes (the issues
for supernovae are mostly different in character), and with the general task of
characterizing dark energy and distinguishing it from alternative explanations
for cosmic acceleration. A companion white paper discusses the kind of
numerical simulations and other theoretical tools that will be needed to
address the these issues and to create mock catalogs that allow end-to-end
tests of analysis procedures. Although we have been thinking about these
problems in the specific context of DES, many of them are also relevant to
other planned dark energy studies.
[88]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0411713 [pdf] - 69312
Cosmology with photometric redshift surveys
Submitted: 2004-11-26, last modified: 2005-08-19
We explore the utility of future photometric redshift imaging surveys for
delineating the large-scale structure of the Universe, and assess the resulting
constraints on the cosmological model. We perform two complementary types of
analysis: (1) We quantify the statistical confidence and the accuracy with
which such surveys will be able to detect and measure characteristic features
in the clustering power spectrum such as the acoustic oscillations and the
turnover, in a 'model-independent' fashion. We show for example that a 10,000
deg^2 imaging survey with depth r = 22.5 and photometric redshift accuracy
dz/(1+z) = 0.03 will detect the acoustic oscillations with 99.9% confidence,
measuring the associated preferred cosmological scale with 2% precision. Such a
survey will also detect the turnover with 95% confidence, determining the
corresponding scale with 20% accuracy. (2) By assuming a Lambda-CDM model power
spectrum we calculate the confidence with which a non-zero baryon fraction can
be deduced from such future galaxy surveys. We quantify 'wiggle detection' by
calculating the number of standard deviations by which the baryon fraction is
measured, after marginalizing over the shape parameter. This is typically a
factor of four more significant (in terms of number of standard deviations)
than the 'model-independent' result. We conclude that the precision with which
the clustering pattern may be inferred from future photometric redshift surveys
will be competitive with contemporaneous spectroscopic redshift surveys,
assuming that systematic effects can be controlled. We also note that an
analysis of Luminous Red Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey may yield a
marginal detection of acoustic oscillations in the imaging survey, in addition
to that recently reported for the spectroscopic component.
[89]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0312430 [pdf] - 61643
Testing for a Super-Acceleration Phase of the Universe
Submitted: 2003-12-17, last modified: 2005-06-06
We propose a method to probe the phenomenological nature of dark energy which
makes no assumptions about the evolution of its energy density. We exemplify
this method with a test for a super-acceleration phase of the universe i.e., a
phase when the dark energy density grows as the universe expands. We show how
such a phase can be detected by combining SNIa (SNAP-like) and CMB (Planck)
data without making any assumptions about the evolution of the dark energy
equation of state, or about the value of the matter density parameter.
[90]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0411673 [pdf] - 69272
Illuminating Dark Energy with Cosmic Shear
Submitted: 2004-11-25, last modified: 2005-03-22
One of the principal goals of modern cosmology is to constrain the properties
of dark energy. At present, numerous surveys are aiming to determine the
equation of state, which is assumed constant due to our poor understanding of
its behaviour (and since higher order parameterisations lead to unwieldy
errors). This raises the question - how does our "best-fit" equation of state
relate to the true function, which may vary with redshift. Saini et al. have
demonstrated that the value of w attained by a supernovae study is well
described by a weighted integral over the true function. Adopting a similar
approach, we calculate the corresponding "weight function" for a fiducial
cosmic shear survey. We disentangle contributions from the angular diameter
distance and the growth factor, finding that they partially cancel each other
out. Consequentially, the sensitivity to w at high redshift is enhanced beyond
that of supernovae studies, and is comparable, if not higher, than lensing of
the CMB. This illustrates the comlementary nature of the different techniques.
Furthermore, we find that results which would naively be interpreted as
inconsistent could arise from a time-dependent equation of state.
[91]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409479 [pdf] - 275837
Galaxy Evolution and Cosmology with the Square Kilometre Array
Submitted: 2004-09-20
The present-day Universe is seemingly dominated by dark energy and dark
matter, but mapping the normal (baryonic) content remains vital for both
astrophysics - understanding how galaxies form - and astro-particle physics -
inferring properties of the dark components. The Square Kilometre Array (SKA)
will provide the only means of studying the cosmic evolution of neutral
Hydrogen (HI) which, alongside information on star formation from the radio
continuum, is needed to understand how stars formed from gas within dark-matter
over-densities and the roles of gas accretion and galaxy merging. `All
hemisphere' HI redshift surveys to redshift 1.5 are feasible with
wide-field-of-view realizations of the SKA and, by measuring the galaxy power
spectrum in exquisite detail, will allow the first precise studies of the
equation-of-state of dark energy. The SKA will be capable of other uniquely
powerful cosmological studies including the measurement of the dark-matter
power spectrum using weak gravitational lensing, and the precise measurement of
H0 using extragalactic water masers. The SKA is likely to become the premier
dark-energy-measuring machine, bringing breakthroughs in cosmology beyond those
likely to be made possible by combining CMB (e.g. Planck), optical (e.g. LSST,
SNAP) and other early-21st-century datasets.
[92]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409278 [pdf] - 67359
Cosmology with the Square Kilometre Array
Submitted: 2004-09-13
We argue that the Square Kilometre Array has the potential to make both
redshift (HI) surveys and radio continuum surveys that will revolutionize
cosmological studies, provided that it has sufficient instantaneous
field-of-view that these surveys can cover a hemisphere in a timescale ~1 yr.
Adopting this assumption, we focus on two key experiments which will yield
fundamental new measurements in cosmology, characterizing the properties of the
mysterious dark energy which dominates the dynamics of today's Universe.
Experiment I will map out ~10^9 HI galaxies to redshift z~1.5, providing the
premier measurement of the clustering power spectrum of galaxies: accurately
delineating the acoustic oscillations and the `turnover'. Experiment II will
quantify the cosmic shear distortion of ~10^10 radio continuum sources,
determining a precise power spectrum of the dark matter, and its growth as a
function of cosmic epoch. We contrast the performance of the SKA in precision
cosmology with that of other facilities which will, probably or possibly, be
available on a similar timescale. We conclude that data from the SKA will yield
transformational science as the direct result of four key features: (i) the
immense cosmic volumes probed, exceeding future optical redshift surveys by
more than an order of magnitude; (ii) well-controlled systematic effects such
as the narrow `k-space window function' for Experiment I and the
accurately-known `point-spread function' for Experiment II; (iii) the ability
to measure with high precision large-scale modes in the clustering power
spectra, for which nuisance effects such as non-linear structure growth,
peculiar velocities and `galaxy bias' are minimised; and (iv) different
degeneracies between key parameters to those which are inherent in the CMB.
[93]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306386 [pdf] - 57467
A preference for a non-zero neutrino mass from cosmological data
Submitted: 2003-06-19, last modified: 2003-08-20
We present results from the analysis of cosmic microwave background (CMB),
large scale structure (galaxy redshift survey) and X-ray galaxy cluster (baryon
fraction and X-ray luminosity function) data, assuming a geometrically flat
cosmological model and allowing for tensor components and a non-negligible
neutrino mass. From a combined analysis of all data, assuming three degenerate
neutrinos species, we measure a contribution of neutrinos to the energy density
of the universe, Omega_nu h^2=0.0059^{+0.0033}_{-0.0027} (68 per cent
confidence limits), with zero falling on the 99 per cent confidence limit. This
corresponds to ~4 per cent of the total mass density of the Universe and
implies a species-summed neutrino mass \sum_i m_i =0.56^{+0.30}_{-0.26} eV, or
m_nu~0.2 eV per neutrino. We examine possible sources of systematic uncertainty
in the results. Combining the CMB, large scale structure and cluster baryon
fraction data, we measure an amplitude of mass fluctuations on 8h^{-1} Mpc
scales of sigma_8=0.74^{+0.12}_{-0.07}, which is consistent with measurements
based on the X-ray luminosity function and other studies of the number density
and evolution of galaxy clusters. This value is lower than that obtained when
fixing a negligible neutrino mass (sigma_8=0.86^{+0.08}_{-0.07}). The
combination of CMB, large scale structure and cluster baryon fraction data also
leads to remarkably tight constraints on the Hubble constant,
H_0=68.4^{+2.0}_{-1.4} km/s/Mpc, mean matter density, Omega_m =0.31\pm0.02 and
physical baryon density, Omega_b h^2=0.024\pm0.001, of the Universe.
[94]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0305526 [pdf] - 56999
Revealing the Nature of Dark Energy Using Bayesian Evidence
Submitted: 2003-05-28
We apply the Bayesian concept of `evidence' to reveal systematically the
nature of dark energy from present and future supernova luminosity distance
measurements. We express the unknown dark energy equation of state w(z) as a
low order polynomial in redshift and use evidence to find the polynomial order,
thereby establishing the minimum order required by the data. We apply this
method to the current supernova data, and with a prior -1 < w(z) < 1 and
Omega_m = 0.3 \pm 0.05, obtain a large probability of 91% for the cosmological
constant model, with the remaining 9% assigned to the two more complex models
tested. We also investigate the use of evidence for future supernova data sets
such as distances obtainable from surveys like the Supernova Acceleration Probe
(SNAP). Given a low uncertainty on the present day matter density we find that,
if the underlying dark energy model is only modestly evolving, then a constant
$w(z)$ fit is sufficient. However, if the evolution of the dark energy equation
of state to linear order is larger than |w_1| ~ 0.5, then the evolution can be
established with statistical significance. For models where we can assume the
prior -1 < w(z) < 1, the correct polynomial order can be established even for
modestly evolving equations of state.
[95]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301536 [pdf] - 54507
Response of distance measures to the equation of state
Submitted: 2003-01-27, last modified: 2003-05-28
We show that the distance measures (such as the luminosity and angular
diameter distances) are linear functionals of the equation-of-state function
w(z) of the dark energy to a fair degree of accuracy in the regimes of
interest. That is, the distance measures can be expressed as a sum of (i) a
constant and (ii) an integral of a weighting function multiplied by the
equation of state parameter w(z). The existence of such an accurate linear
response approximation has several important implications: (a) Fitting a
constant w model to the data drawn from an evolving model has a simple
interpretation as a weighted average of w(z). (b) Any polynomial (or other
expansion coefficients can also be expressed as weighted sums of the true w(z).
(c) A replacement for the commonly used heuristic equation for the effective
w(z), as determined by the CMB, can be derived and the result is found to be
quite close to the heuristic expression commonly used. (d) The reconstruction
of w(z) by Huterer et al. (2002) can be expressed as a matrix inversion. In
each case the limitations of the linear response approximation are explored and
found to be surprisingly small.
[96]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302306 [pdf] - 54933
Reconstructing the primordial power spectrum
Submitted: 2003-02-17, last modified: 2003-05-16
We reconstruct the shape of the primordial power spectrum from the latest
cosmic microwave background data, including the new results from the Wilkinson
Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and large scale structure data from the two
degree field galaxy redshift survey (2dFGRS). We tested four parameterizations
taking into account the uncertainties in four cosmological parameters. First we
parameterize the initial spectrum by a tilt and a running spectral index,
finding marginal evidence for a running spectral index only if the first three
WMAP multipoles (ell=2,3,4) are included in the analysis. Secondly, to
investigate further the low CMB large scale power, we modify the conventional
power-law spectrum by introducing a scale above which there is no power. We
find a preferred position of the cut at k_c ~ 3e-4 /Mpc although k_c=0 (no cut)
is not ruled out. Thirdly we use a model independent parameterization, with 16
bands in wavenumber, and find no obvious sign of deviation from a power law
spectrum on the scales investigated. Furthermore the values of the other
cosmological parameters defining the model remain relatively well constrained
despite the freedom in the shape of the initial power spectrum. Finally we
investigate a model motivated by double inflation, in which the power spectrum
has a break between two characteristic wavenumbers. We find that if a break is
required to be in the range 0.01 < k Mpc <0.1 then the ratio of amplitudes
across the break is constrained to be 1.23 +/- 0.14. Our results are consistent
with a power law spectrum that is featureless and close to scale invariant over
the wavenumber range 0.005 ~< k Mpc ~< 0.15, with a hint of a decrease in power
on the largest scales.
[97]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303180 [pdf] - 55419
Precision Cosmology? Not Just Yet
Submitted: 2003-03-10
The recent announcement from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
satellite experiment combined with other recent advances in observational
cosmology verifies key components of the standard cosmological model. However,
we argue that there remain some significant open issues regarding the basic
history and composition of the Universe and uncertainties in some of the most
important parameters.
[98]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0112114 [pdf] - 46487
Analytic marginalization over CMB calibration and beam uncertainty
Submitted: 2001-12-05, last modified: 2002-10-15
With the increased accuracy and angular scale coverage of the recent CMB
experiments it has become important to include calibration and beam
uncertainties when estimating cosmological parameters. This requires an
integration over possible values of the calibration and beam size, which can be
done numerically but increases computation times. We present a fast and simple
algorithm for marginalization over beam and calibration errors by analytical
integration. We also illustrate the effect of incorporating these uncertainties
by calculating the constraints on various cosmological and inflationary
parameters including the spectral index n_s and the physical baryon density
Omega_b h^2, using the latest CMB data. We find that parameter constraints are
significantly changed when calibration/beam uncertainties are taken into
account. Typically the best fit parameters are shifted and the errors bars are
increased by up to fifty per cent for e.g. n_s and Omega_b h^2, although as
expected there is no change for Omega_K, because it is constrained by the
positions of the peaks.
[99]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0205436 [pdf] - 49510
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach
Submitted: 2002-05-24, last modified: 2002-10-14
We present a fast Markov Chain Monte-Carlo exploration of cosmological
parameter space. We perform a joint analysis of results from recent CMB
experiments and provide parameter constraints, including sigma_8, from the CMB
independent of other data. We next combine data from the CMB, HST Key Project,
2dF galaxy redshift survey, supernovae Ia and big-bang nucleosynthesis. The
Monte Carlo method allows the rapid investigation of a large number of
parameters, and we present results from 6 and 9 parameter analyses of flat
models, and an 11 parameter analysis of non-flat models. Our results include
constraints on the neutrino mass (m_nu < 0.3eV), equation of state of the dark
energy, and the tensor amplitude, as well as demonstrating the effect of
additional parameters on the base parameter constraints. In a series of
appendices we describe the many uses of importance sampling, including
computing results from new data and accuracy correction of results generated
from an approximate method. We also discuss the different ways of converting
parameter samples to parameter constraints, the effect of the prior, assess the
goodness of fit and consistency, and describe the use of analytic
marginalization over normalization parameters.
[100]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0204152 [pdf] - 48697
A new upper limit on the total neutrino mass from the 2dF Galaxy
Redshift Survey
Elgaroy, O.;
Lahav, O.;
Percival, W. J.;
Peacock, J. A.;
Madgwick, D. S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Baugh, C. M.;
Baldry, I. K.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Bridges, T.;
Cannon, R.;
Cole, S.;
Colless, M.;
Collins, C.;
Couch, W.;
Dalton, G.;
De Propris, R.;
Driver, S. P.;
Efstathiou, G. P.;
Ellis, R. S.;
Frenk, C. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Jackson, C.;
Lewis, I.;
Lumsden, S.;
Maddox, S.;
Norberg, P.;
Peterson, B. A.;
Sutherland, W.;
Taylor, K.
Submitted: 2002-04-09, last modified: 2002-06-14
We constrain f_nu = Omega_nu / Omega_m, the fractional contribution of
neutrinos to the total mass density in the Universe, by comparing the power
spectrum of fluctuations derived from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey with power
spectra for models with four components: baryons, cold dark matter, massive
neutrinos and a cosmological constant. Adding constraints from independent
cosmological probes we find f_nu < 0.13 (at 95% confidence) for a prior of 0.1<
Omega_m <0.5, and assuming the scalar spectral index n=1. This translates to an
upper limit on the total neutrino mass and m_nu,tot < 1.8 eV for "concordance"
values of Omega_m and the Hubble constant. Very similar results are obtained
with a prior on Omega_m from Type Ia supernovae surveys, and with
marginalization over n.
[101]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0112396 [pdf] - 46769
Maximum-entropy weak lens reconstruction: improved methods and
application to data
Submitted: 2001-12-17, last modified: 2002-05-21
We develop the maximum-entropy weak shear mass reconstruction method
presented in earlier papers by taking each background galaxy image shape as an
independent estimator of the reduced shear field and incorporating an intrinsic
smoothness into the reconstruction. The characteristic length scale of this
smoothing is determined by Bayesian methods. Within this algorithm the
uncertainties due to both the intrinsic distribution of galaxy shapes and
galaxy shape estimation are carried through to the final mass reconstruction,
and the mass within arbitrarily shaped apertures can be calculated with
corresponding uncertainties. We apply this method to two clusters taken from
n-body simulations using mock observations corresponding to Keck LRIS and
mosaiced HST WFPC2 fields. We demonstrate that the Bayesian choice of smoothing
length is sensible and that masses within apertures (including one on a
filamentary structure) are reliable, provided the field of view is not too
small. We apply the method to data taken on the cluster MS1054-03 using the
Keck LRIS (Clowe et al. 2000) and HST (Hoekstra et al. 2000), finding results
in agreement with this previous work; we also present reconstructions with
optimal smoothing lengths, and mass estimates which do not rely on any
assumptions of circular symmetry. The code used in this work (LensEnt2) is
available from the web.
[102]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0112162 [pdf] - 329027
The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The amplitudes of fluctuations in the
2dFGRS and the CMB, and implications for galaxy biasing
Lahav, Ofer;
Bridle, Sarah L.;
Percival, Will J.;
Peacock, John A.;
Efstathiou, George;
Baugh, Carlton M.;
Bland-Hawthorn, Joss;
Bridges, Terry;
Cannon, Russell;
Cole, Shaun;
Colless, Matthew;
Collins, Chris;
Couch, Warrick;
Dalton, Gavin;
De Propris, Roberto;
Driver, Simon P.;
Ellis, Richard S.;
Frenk, Carlos S.;
Glazebrook, Karl;
Jackson, Carole;
Lewis, Ian;
Lumsden, Stuart;
Maddox, Steve;
Madgwick, Darren S.;
Moody, Stephen;
Norberg, Peder;
Peterson, Bruce A.;
Sutherland, Will;
Taylor, Keith
Submitted: 2001-12-07, last modified: 2002-05-19
We compare the amplitudes of fluctuations probed by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift
Survey and by the latest measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background
anisotropies. By combining the 2dFGRS and CMB data we find the linear-theory
rms mass fluctuations in 8 Mpc/h spheres to be sigma_8 = 0.73 +-0.05 (after
marginalization over the matter density parameter Omega_m and three other free
parameters). This normalization is lower than the COBE normalization and
previous estimates from cluster abundance, but it is in agreement with some
revised cluster abundance determinations. We also estimate the
scale-independent bias parameter of present-epoch L_s = 1.9L_* APM-selected
galaxies to be b(L_s,z=0) = 1.10 +- 0.08 on comoving scales of 0.02 < k < 0.15
h/Mpc. If luminosity segregation operates on these scales, L_* galaxies would
be almost un-biased, b(L_*,z=0) = 0.96. These results are derived by assuming a
flat Lambda-CDM Universe, and by marginalizing over other free parameters and
fixing the spectral index n=1 and the optical depth due to reionization tau=0.
We also study the best fit pair (Omega_m,b), and the robustness of the results
to varying n and tau. Various modelling corrections can each change the
resulting b by 5-15 per cent. The results are compared with other independent
measurements from the 2dFGRS itself, and from the SDSS, cluster abundance and
cosmic shear.
[103]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0203259 [pdf] - 48280
Combining cosmological datasets: hyperparameters and Bayesian evidence
Submitted: 2002-03-15
A method is presented for performing joint analyses of cosmological datasets,
in which the weight assigned to each dataset is determined directly by it own
statistical properties. The weights are considered in a Bayesian context as a
set of hyperparameters, which are then marginalised over in order to recover
the posterior distribution as a function only of the cosmological parameters of
interest. In the case of a Gaussian likelihood function, this marginalisation
may be performed analytically. Calculation of the Bayesian evidence for the
data, with and without the introduction of hyperparameters, enables a direct
determination of whether the data warrant the introduction of weights into the
analysis; this generalises the standard likelihood ratio approach to model
comparison. The method is illustrated by application to the classic toy problem
of fitting a straight line to a set of data. A cosmological illustration of the
technique is also presented, in which the latest measurements of the cosmic
microwave background power spectrum are used to infer constraints on
cosmological parameters.
[104]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0012478 [pdf] - 40067
Cosmic Data Fusion
Submitted: 2000-12-22
We compare and combine likelihood functions of the cosmological parameters
Omega_m, h and sigma_8 from the CMB, type Ia supernovae and from probes of
large scale structure. We include the recent results from the CMB experiments
BOOMERANG and MAXIMA-1. Our analysis assumes a flat LambdaCDM cosmology with a
scale-invariant adiabatic initial power spectrum. First we consider three data
sets that directly probe the mass in the Universe, without the need to relate
the galaxy distribution to the underlying mass via a `biasing' relation:
peculiar velocities, CMB and supernovae. We assume a baryonic fraction as
inferred from Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis and find that all three data sets agree
well, overlapping significantly at the 2-sigma level. This therefore justifies
a joint analysis, in which we find a joint best fit point and 95% confidence
limits of Omega_m=0.28 (0.17,0.39), h=0.74 (0.64,0.86), and sigma_8=1.17
(0.98,1.37). Secondly we extend our earlier work on combining CMB, supernovae,
cluster number counts, IRAS galaxy redshift survey data to include BOOMERANG
and MAXIMA-1 data and to allow a free Omega_b h^2. We find that, given our
assumption of a scale invariant initial power spectrum (n=1), we obtain the
robust result of Omega_b h^2= 0.031 +/- 0.03, which is dominated by the CMB
constraint.
[105]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0010387 [pdf] - 38734
Maximum-entropy reconstruction of gravitational lenses using shear
and/or magnification data
Submitted: 2000-10-19
We demonstrate that the maximum-entropy method for gravitational lens
reconstruction presented in Bridle et al. (1998) may be applied even when only
shear \emph{or} magnification information is present. We also demonstrate that
the method can easily handle irregularly shaped observing fields and, because
shear is a non-local function of the lensing mass, reconstructions that use
shear information can successfully bridge small gaps in observations. For our
simulations we use a mass density distribution that is realistic for a z=0.4
cluster of total mass around 10^15 h^-1 M_solar. Using HST-quality shear data
alone, covering the area of four WFPC2 observations, we detect 60 per cent of
the mass of the cluster within the area observed, despite the mass sheet
degeneracy. This is qualitatively because the shear provides information about
the variations in the mass distribution, and our prior includes a positivity
constraint. We investigate the effect of using various sizes of observing field
and find that 50 to 100 per cent of the cluster mass is detected, depending on
the observing strategy and cluster shape. Finally we demonstrate how this
method can cope with strong lensing regions of a mass distribution.
[106]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0006170 [pdf] - 36550
Cosmological Parameters from Velocities, CMB and Supernovae
Submitted: 2000-06-12
We compare and combine likelihood functions of the cosmological parameters
Omega_m, h and sigma_8, from peculiar velocities, CMB and type Ia supernovae.
These three data sets directly probe the mass in the Universe, without the need
to relate the galaxy distribution to the underlying mass via a "biasing"
relation. We include the recent results from the CMB experiments BOOMERANG and
MAXIMA-1. Our analysis assumes a flat Lambda CDM cosmology with a
scale-invariant adiabatic initial power spectrum and baryonic fraction as
inferred from big-bang nucleosynthesis. We find that all three data sets agree
well, overlapping significantly at the 2 sigma level. This therefore justifies
a joint analysis, in which we find a joint best fit point and 95 per cent
confidence limits of Omega_m=0.28 (0.17,0.39), h=0.74 (0.64,0.86), and
sigma_8=1.17 (0.98,1.37). In terms of the natural parameter combinations for
these data sigma_8 Omega_m^0.6 = 0.54 (0.40,0.73), Omega_m h = 0.21
(0.16,0.27). Also for the best fit point, Q_rms-ps = 19.7 muK and the age of
the universe is 13.2 Gyr.
[107]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9912105 [pdf] - 109768
Bayesian `Hyper-Parameters' Approach to Joint Estimation: The Hubble
Constant from CMB Measurements
Submitted: 1999-12-06
Recently several studies have jointly analysed data from different
cosmological probes with the motivation of estimating cosmological parameters.
Here we generalise this procedure to take into account the relative weights of
various probes. This is done by including in the joint \chi^2 function a set of
`Hyper-Parameters', which are dealt with using Bayesian considerations. The
resulting algorithm (in the case of uniform priors on the log of the
Hyper-Parameters) is very simple: instead of minimising \sum \chi_j^2 (where
\chi_j^2 is per data set j) we propose to minimise \sum N_j \ln (\chi_j^2)
(where N_j is the number of data points per data set j). We illustrate the
method by estimating the Hubble constant H_0 from different sets of recent CMB
experiments (including Saskatoon, Python V, MSAM1, TOCO and Boomerang).
[108]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903472 [pdf] - 105876
Cosmological parameters from cluster abundances, CMB and IRAS
Submitted: 1999-03-31
We combine information on cosmological parameters from cluster abundances,
CMB primordial anisotropies and the IRAS 1.2 Jy galaxy redshift survey. We take
as free parameters the present values of the total matter density of the
universe, Omega_m, the Hubble parameter, h, sigma_8, and the IRAS biasing
factor, b_IRAS. We assume that the universe is spatially flat, with a
cosmological constant, and that structure formed from adiabatic initial
fluctuations with a Harrison-Zel'dovich power spectrum. The nucleosynthesis
value Omega_b=0.019/h^2 is adopted. We use the full three- and four-
dimensional likelihood functions for each data set and marginalise these to
two- and one- dimensional distributions in a Bayesian way, integrating over the
other parameters. It is shown that the three data sets are in excellent
agreement, with a best fit point of Omega_m= 1-Omega_Lambda=0.36, h=0.54,
sigma_8=0.74, and b_IRAS=1.08. This point is within one sigma of the minimum
for each data set alone. Pairs of these data sets have their degeneracies in
sufficiently different directions that using only two data sets at a time is
sufficient to place good constraints on the cosmological parameters. We show
that the results from each of the three possible pairings of the data are also
in good agreement. Finally, we combine all three data sets to obtain
marginalised 68 per cent confidence intervals of 0.30<Omega_m<0.43,
0.48<h<0.59, 0.69<sigma_8<0.79, and 1.01<b_IRAS<1.16. For the best fit
parameters the CMB quadrupole is Q_rms-ps=18.0 uK, Gamma=0.15, Omega_b=0.066
and the age of the universe is 16.7 Gyr.
[109]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9901303 [pdf] - 104897
Combining Supernovae and LSS Information with the CMB
Submitted: 1999-01-21
Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), large scale structure
(LSS) and standard candles such as Type 1a Supernovae (SN) each place different
constraints on the values of cosmological parameters. We assume an inflationary
Cold Dark Matter model with a cosmological constant, in which the initial
density perturbations in the universe are adiabatic. We discuss the parameter
degeneracies inherent in interpreting CMB or SN data, and derive their
orthogonal nature. We then present our preliminary results of combining CMB and
SN likelihood functions. The results of combining the CMB and IRAS 1.2 Jy
survey information are given, with marginalised confidence regions in the H_0,
Omega_m, b_IRAS and Q_rms-ps directions assuming n=1, Omega_Lambda+Omega_m=1
and Omega_b h^2=0.024. Finally we combine all three likelihood functions and
find that the three data sets are consistent and suitably orthogonal, leading
to tight constraints on H_0, Omega_m, b_IRAS and Q_rms-ps, given our
assumptions.
[110]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9810169 [pdf] - 103285
Joint cosmological inference from galaxy surveys, the Cosmic Microwave
Background and the X-Ray Background
Submitted: 1998-10-11
We discuss cosmological inference from galaxy surveys, the X-Ray Background
(XRB) and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). We assume a family of Cold
Dark Matter (CDM) models in a spatially flat universe with an initially
scale-invariant spectrum and a cosmological constant. Joint analysis of the CMB
and IRAS resdhift surveys yields as optimal parameters (for fixed Omega_b h^2 =
0.024): Omega_m = 1- \omega_lambda = 0.4, h = 0.53, Q = 17muK, and b_iras= 1.2.
For the above parameters the normalisation and shape of the mass power-spectrum
are sigma_8=0.7 and Gamma=0.15, and the age of the Universe is 16.5 Gyr.
Assuming a standard CDM model, the joint IRAS and XRB analysis gives bias
parameters of b_iras = 1.1 and b_x(z=0) = 2.6. When combining CMB and IRAS with
XRB data we show that standard CDM cannot fit all three data sets. We also use
these data sets to verify the Cosmological Principle and to constrain the
fractal dimension of the universe on large scales.
[111]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802109 [pdf] - 100280
Joint estimation of cosmological parameters from CMB and IRAS data
Submitted: 1998-02-09, last modified: 1998-08-27
Observations of large scale structure (LSS) and the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) each place separate constraints on the values of cosmological
parameters. We calculate a joint likelihood based on various CMB experiments
and the IRAS 1.2Jy galaxy redshift survey and use this to find an overall
optimum with respect to the free parameters. Our formulation self-consistently
takes account of the underlying mass distribution, which affects both the CMB
potential fluctuations and the IRAS redshift distortion. This not only allows
more accurate parameter estimation, but also removes the parameter degeneracy
which handicaps calculations based on either approach alone. The family of Cold
Dark Matter (CDM) models analysed corresponds to a spatially-flat universe with
an initially scale-invariant spectrum and a cosmological constant. Free
parameters in the joint model are the mass density due to all matter (Omega_m),
Hubble's parameter (h = H_0 / 100km/s Mpc^-1), the quadrupole normalisation of
the CMB power spectrum (Q) in uK, and the IRAS light-to-mass bias (b_i).
Throughout the analysis, the baryonic density (Omega_b) is required is to
satisfy the nucleosynthesis constraint Omega_b h^2 = 0.024. Results from the
two data sets show good agreement, and the joint optimum lies at Omega_m=0.39,
h=0.53, Q=16.96uK, and b_i=1.21. The 68 per cent confidence intervals are:
0.29<Omega_m<0.53, 0.39<h<0.58, 15.34<Q<17.60, and 0.98<b_i<1.56. For the above
parameters the normalisation and shape of the mass power-spectrum are
sigma_8=0.67 and Gamma=0.15, and the age of the Universe is 16.5Gyr.
[112]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802159 [pdf] - 100330
A maximum-entropy method for reconstructing the projected mass
distribution of gravitational lenses
Submitted: 1998-02-12, last modified: 1998-06-29
The maximum-entropy method is applied to the problem of reconstructing the
projected mass density of a galaxy cluster using its gravitational lensing
effects on background galaxies. We demonstrate the method by reconstructing the
mass distribution in a model cluster using simulated shear and magnification
data to which Gaussian noise is added. The mass distribution is reconstructed
directly and the inversion is regularised using the entropic prior for this
positive additive distribution. For realistic noise levels, we find that the
method faithfully reproduces the main features of the cluster mass distribution
not only within the observed field but also slightly beyond it. We estimate the
uncertainties on the reconstruction by calculating an analytic approximation to
the covariance matrix of the reconstruction values of each pixel. This result
is compared with error estimates derived from Monte-Carlo simulations for
different noise realisations and found to be in good agreement.
