Normalized to: Breddels, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00156 [pdf] - 2011885
Axisymmetric Schwarzschild models of an isothermal axisymmetric mock
dwarf spheroidal galaxy
Submitted: 2019-06-29
We test the ability of Schwarzschild's orbit superposition method in
measuring the mass content, scale radius and shape of a flattened dwarf
spheroidal galaxy. Until now, most dynamical model efforts have assumed that
dwarf spheroidal galaxies and their host halos are spherical. We use an Evans
model (1993) to construct an isothermal mock galaxy whose properties somewhat
resemble those of the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy. This mock galaxy
contains flattened luminous and dark matter components, resulting in a
logarithmic profile for the global potential. We have tested how well our
Schwarzschild method could constrain the characteristic parameters of the
system for different sample sizes, and also if the functional form of the
potential was unknown. When assuming the true functional form of the potential,
the Schwarzschild modelling technique is able to provide an accurate and
precise measurement of the characteristic mass parameter of the system and
reproduces well the light distribution and the stellar kinematics of our mock
galaxy. When assuming a different functional form for the potential, such as a
flattened NFW profile, we also constrain the mass and scale radius to their
expected values. However in both cases, we find that the flattening parameter
remains largely unconstrained. This is likely because the information content
of the velocity dispersion on the geometric shape of the potential is too
small, since $\sigma$ is constant across our mock dSph. Our results using
Schwarzschild's method indicate that the mass enclosed can be derived reliably,
even if the flattening parameter is unknown, and already for samples containing
2000 line-of-sight radial velocities, such as those currently available.
Further applications of the method to more general distribution functions of
flattened systems are needed to establish how well the flattening of dSph dark
halos can be determined.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09375 [pdf] - 1736360
Gaia Data Release 2: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F.;
Luri, X.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Helmi, A.;
Muraveva, T.;
Robin, A. C.;
Spoto, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Antoja, T.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Jordi, C.;
Leclerc, N.;
Reylé, C.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Shih, I-C.;
Soria, S.;
Barache, C.;
Bossini, D.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Lambert, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Massari, D.;
Moitinho, A.;
Robichon, N.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sordo, R.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Eyer, L.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Pancino, E.;
Soubiran, C.;
Spagna, A.;
Tanga, P.;
Turon, C.;
Zurbach, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The second Gaia data release (DR2), contains very precise astrometric and
photometric properties for more than one billion sources, astrophysical
parameters for dozens of millions, radial velocities for millions, variability
information for half a million of stellar sources and orbits for thousands of
solar system objects. Before the Catalogue publication, these data have
undergone dedicated validation processes. The goal of this paper is to describe
the validation results in terms of completeness, accuracy and precision of the
various Gaia DR2 data. The validation processes include a systematic analysis
of the Catalogue content to detect anomalies, either individual errors or
statistical properties, using statistical analysis, and comparisons to external
data or to models. Although the astrometric, photometric and spectroscopic data
are of unprecedented quality and quantity, it is shown that the data cannot be
used without a dedicated attention to the limitations described here, in the
Catalogue documentation and in accompanying papers. A particular emphasis is
put on the caveats for the statistical use of the data in scientific
exploitation.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05245 [pdf] - 1806003
Leaves on trees: identifying halo stars with extreme gradient boosted
trees
Submitted: 2018-04-14, last modified: 2018-04-23
Extended stellar haloes are a natural by-product of the hierarchical
formation of massive galaxies. If merging is a non-negligible factor in the
growth of our Galaxy, evidence of such events should be encoded in its stellar
halo. Reliable identification of genuine halo stars is a challenging task
however. The 1st Gaia data release contains the positions, parallaxes and
proper motions for over 2 million stars, mostly in the Solar neighbourhood.
Gaia DR2 will enlarge this sample to over 1.5 billion stars, the brightest ~5
million of which will have a full phase-space information. Our aim is to
develop a machine learning model to reliably identify halo stars, even when
their full phase-space information is not available. We use the Gradient
Boosted Trees algorithm to build a supervised halo star classifier. The
classifier is trained on a sample extracted from the Gaia Universe Model
Snapshot, convolved with the errors of TGAS, as well as with the expected
uncertainties of the upcoming Gaia DR2. We also trained our classifier on the
cross-match between the TGAS and RAVE catalogues, where the halo stars are
labelled in an entirely model independent way. We then use this model to
identify halo stars in TGAS. When full phase- space information is available
and for Gaia DR2-like uncertainties, our classifier is able to recover 90% of
the halo stars with at most 30% distance errors, in a completely unseen test
set, and with negligible levels of contamination. When line-of-sight velocity
is not available, we recover ~60% of such halo stars, with less than 10%
contamination. When applied to the TGAS data, our classifier detects 337 high
confidence RGB halo stars. Although small, this number is consistent with the
expectation from models given the data uncertainties. The large parallax errors
are the biggest limitation to identify a larger number of halo stars in all the
cases studied.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.04766 [pdf] - 1716959
The dynamically selected stellar halo of the Galaxy with Gaia and the
tilt of the velocity ellipsoid
Submitted: 2017-11-13, last modified: 2018-04-14
We study the dynamical properties of halo stars located in the Solar
Neighbourhood. Our goal is to explore how the properties of the halo depend on
the selection criteria used for defining a sample of halo stars. Once this is
understood we proceed to measure the shape and orientation of the halo's
velocity ellipsoid and we use this information to put constraints on the
gravitational potential of the Galaxy. We use the recently released Gaia DR1
catalogue cross-matched to the RAVE dataset for our analysis. We develop a
dynamical criterion based on the distribution function of stars in various
Galactic components, using action integrals to identify halo members, and
compare this to metallicity and to kinematically selected samples. With this
new method, we find 1156 stars in the Solar Neighbourhood to be likely members
of the stellar halo. Our dynamically selected sample consists mainly of distant
giants on elongated orbits. Their metallicity distribution is rather broad,
with roughly half of the stars having [M/H] $\ge -1$ dex. The use of different
selection criteria has an important impact on the characteristics of the
velocity distributions obtained. Nonetheless, for our dynamically selected and
for the metallicity selected samples, we find the local velocity ellipsoid to
be aligned in spherical coordinates in a Galactocentric reference frame: this
suggests that the total gravitational potential is rather spherical in the
region spanned by the orbits of the halo stars in these samples.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02638 [pdf] - 1762904
Vaex: Big Data exploration in the era of Gaia
Submitted: 2018-01-08
We present a new Python library called vaex, to handle extremely large
tabular datasets, such as astronomical catalogues like the Gaia catalogue,
N-body simulations or any other regular datasets which can be structured in
rows and columns. Fast computations of statistics on regular N-dimensional
grids allows analysis and visualization in the order of a billion rows per
second. We use streaming algorithms, memory mapped files and a zero memory copy
policy to allow exploration of datasets larger than memory, e.g. out-of-core
algorithms. Vaex allows arbitrary (mathematical) transformations using normal
Python expressions and (a subset of) numpy functions which are lazily evaluated
and computed when needed in small chunks, which avoids wasting of RAM. Boolean
expressions (which are also lazily evaluated) can be used to explore subsets of
the data, which we call selections. Vaex uses a similar DataFrame API as
Pandas, a very popular library, which helps migration from Pandas.
Visualization is one of the key points of vaex, and is done using binned
statistics in 1d (e.g. histogram), in 2d (e.g. 2d histograms with colormapping)
and 3d (using volume rendering). Vaex is split in in several packages:
vaex-core for the computational part, vaex-viz for visualization mostly based
on matplotlib, vaex-jupyter for visualization in the Jupyter notebook/lab based
in IPyWidgets, vaex-server for the (optional) client-server communication,
vaex-ui for the Qt based interface, vaex-hdf5 for hdf5 based memory mapped
storage, vaex-astro for astronomy related selections, transformations and
memory mapped (column based) fits storage. Vaex is open source and available
under MIT license on github, documentation and other information can be found
on the main website: https://vaex.io, https://docs.vaex.io or
https://github.com/maartenbreddels/vaex
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.08945 [pdf] - 1591655
3D motions in the Sculptor dwarf galaxy as a glimpse of a new era
Submitted: 2017-11-24
The 3D motions of stars in small galaxies beyond our own are minute and yet
they are crucial for our understanding of the nature of gravity and dark
matter. Even for the dwarf galaxy Sculptor which is one of the best studied
systems and inferred to be strongly dark matter dominated, there are
conflicting reports on its mean motion around the Milky Way and the 3D internal
motions of its stars have never been measured. Here we report, based on data
from the Gaia space mission and the Hubble Space Telescope, a new precise
measurement of Sculptor's mean proper motion. From this we deduce that Sculptor
is currently at its closest approach to the Milky Way and moving on an
elongated high-inclination orbit that takes it much farther away than
previously thought. For the first time we are also able to measure the internal
motions of stars in Sculptor. We find $\sigma_{R}=11.5 \pm 4.3$ km/s and
$\sigma_{T}=8.5\pm3.2$ km/s along the projected radial and tangential
directions, implying that the stars in our sample move preferentially on radial
orbits as quantified by the anisotropy parameter, which we find to be
$\beta\sim 0.86^{+0.12}_{-0.83}$ at a location beyond the core radius. Taken at
face value such a high radial anisotropy requires abandoning conventional
models for the mass distribution in Sculptor. Our sample is dominated by
metal-rich stars and for these we find $\beta^{MR} \sim 0.95^{+0.04}_{-0.27}$,
a value consistent with multi-component models where Sculptor is embedded in a
cuspy dark halo as expected for cold dark matter.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.00292 [pdf] - 1539003
Gaia Data Release 1: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F.;
Luri, X.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Helmi, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Findeisen, K.;
Reylé, C.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sordo, R.;
Turon, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Shih, I-C.;
Antiche, E.;
Barache, C.;
Barros, M.;
Breddels, M.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Costigan, G.;
Diakité, S.;
Eyer, L.;
Figueras, F.;
Galluccio, L.;
Heu, J.;
Jordi, C.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lallement, R.;
Lambert, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mor, R.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Soria, S.;
Soubiran, C.;
Souchay, J.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Pancino, E.;
Bragaglia, A.
Submitted: 2017-01-01
Before the publication of the Gaia Catalogue, the contents of the first data
release have undergone multiple dedicated validation tests. These tests aim at
analysing in-depth the Catalogue content to detect anomalies, individual
problems in specific objects or in overall statistical properties, either to
filter them before the public release, or to describe the different caveats of
the release for an optimal exploitation of the data. Dedicated methods using
either Gaia internal data, external catalogues or models have been developed
for the validation processes. They are testing normal stars as well as various
populations like open or globular clusters, double stars, variable stars,
quasars. Properties of coverage, accuracy and precision of the data are
provided by the numerous tests presented here and jointly analysed to assess
the data release content. This independent validation confirms the quality of
the published data, Gaia DR1 being the most precise all-sky astrometric and
photometric catalogue to-date. However, several limitations in terms of
completeness, astrometric and photometric quality are identified and described.
Figures describing the relevant properties of the release are shown and the
testing activities carried out validating the user interfaces are also
described. A particular emphasis is made on the statistical use of the data in
scientific exploitation.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.00222 [pdf] - 1532370
A box full of chocolates: The rich structure of the nearby stellar halo
revealed by Gaia and RAVE
Submitted: 2016-11-01, last modified: 2016-12-23
The hierarchical structure formation model predicts that stellar halos should
form, at least partly, via mergers. If this was a predominant formation channel
for the Milky Way's halo, imprints of this merger history in the form of moving
groups or streams should exist also in the vicinity of the Sun. Here we study
the kinematics of halo stars in the Solar neighbourhood using the very recent
first data release from the Gaia mission, and in particular the TGAS dataset,
in combination with data from the RAVE survey. Our aim is to determine the
amount of substructure present in the phase-space distribution of halo stars
that could be linked to merger debris. To characterise kinematic substructure,
we measure the velocity correlation function in our sample of halo (low
metallicity) stars. We also study the distribution of these stars in the space
of energy and two components of the angular momentum, in what we call
"Integrals of Motion" space. The velocity correlation function reveals
substructure in the form of an excess of pairs of stars with similar
velocities, well above that expected for a smooth distribution. Comparison to
cosmological simulations of the formation of stellar halos indicate that the
levels found are consistent with the Galactic halo having been built fully via
accretion. Similarly, the distribution of stars in the space of "Integrals of
motion" is highly complex. A strikingly high fraction (between 58% and upto
73%) of the stars that are somewhat less bound than the Sun are on (highly)
retrograde orbits. A simple comparison to Milky Way-mass galaxies in
cosmological hydrodynamical simulations suggests that less than 1% have such
prominently retrograde outer halos. We also identify several other
statistically significant structures in "Integrals of Motion" space that could
potentially be related to merger events.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.04183 [pdf] - 1580889
Interactive (statistical) visualisation and exploration of a billion
objects with Vaex
Submitted: 2016-12-12
With new catalogues arriving such as the Gaia DR1, containing more than a
billion objects, new methods of handling and visualizing these data volumes are
needed. In visualization, one problem is that the number of datapoints can
become so large, that a scatter plot becomes cluttered. Another problem is that
with over a billion objects, only a few cpu cycles are available per object if
one wants to process them within a second, making traditional methods by
rendering glyphs not viable. Instead, we show that by calculating statistics on
a regular (N-dimensional) grid, visualizations of a billion objects can be done
within a second on a modern desktop computer. This is achieved using memory
mapping of hdf5 files together with a simple binning algorithm, which are part
of a Python library called vaex. This enables efficient exploration or large
datasets interactively, making science exploration of large catalogues
feasible. Vaex is a Python library, which also integrates well in the
Jupyter/Numpy/Astropy/matplotlib stack. Build on top of this is the vaex
application, which allows for interactive exploration and visualization. The
motivation for developing vaex is the catalogue of the Gaia satellite, however,
vaex can also be used on SPH or N-body simulations, any other (future)
catalogues such as SDSS, Pan-STARRS, LSST, WISE, 2MASS, etc. or other tabular
data. The homepage for vaex is http://vaex.astro.rug.nl.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.03995 [pdf] - 1319591
Matching the dark matter profiles of dSph galaxies with those of
simulated satellites: a two parameter comparison
Submitted: 2015-07-14, last modified: 2015-07-27
We compare the dark matter halos' structural parameters derived for four
Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies to those of subhalos found in cosmological
$N$-body simulations. We confirm that estimates of the mass at a single fixed
radius are fully consistent with the observations. However, when a second
structural parameter such as the logarithmic slope of the dark halo density
profile measured close to the half-light radius is included in the comparison,
we find little to no overlap between the satellites and the subhalos. Typically
the right mass subhalos have steeper profiles at these radii than measurements
of the dSph suggest. Using energy arguments we explore if it is possible to
solve this discrepancy by invoking baryonic effects. Assuming that feedback
from supernovae can lead to a reshaping of the halos, we compute the required
efficiency and find entirely plausible values for a significant fraction of the
subhalos and even as low as 0.1%. This implies that care must be taken not to
exaggerate the effect of supernovae feedback as this could make the halos too
shallow. These results could be used to calibrate and possibly constrain
feedback recipes in hydrodynamical simulations.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01215 [pdf] - 931040
What can Gaia proper motions tell us about Milky Way dwarf galaxies?
Submitted: 2015-02-04
We present a proper-motion study on models of the dwarf spheroidal galaxy
Sculptor, based on the predicted proper-motion accuracy of Gaia measurements.
Gaia will measure proper motions of several hundreds of stars for a
Sculptor-like system. Even with an uncertainty on the proper motion of order
1.5 times the size of an individual proper-motion value of ~10 mas/century, we
find that it is possible to recover Sculptor's systemic proper motion at its
distance of 79 kpc.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1404.5958 [pdf] - 1209139
Complexity on dwarf galaxies scale: A bimodal distribution function in
Sculptor
Submitted: 2014-04-23, last modified: 2014-09-16
In previous work we have presented Schwarzschild models of the Sculptor dSph,
demonstrating that this system could be embedded in dark matter halos that are
either cusped or cored. Here we show that the non-parametric distribution
function recovered through Schwarschild's method is bimodal in energy and
angular momentum space for all best fitting mass models explored. We
demonstrate that this bimodality is directly related to the two components
known to be present in Sculptor through stellar populations analysis, although
our method is purely dynamical in nature and does not use this prior
information. It therefore constitutes independent confirmation of the existence
of two physically distinct dynamical components in Sculptor and suggests a
rather complex assembly history for this dwarf galaxy.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.1690 [pdf] - 1173269
An analytic distribution function for a massless cored stellar system in
a cuspy dark matter halo
Submitted: 2013-08-07
We demonstrate the existence of distribution functions that can be used to
represent spherical massless cored stellar systems embedded in cuspy dark
matter halos with constant mildly tangential velocity anisotropy. In
particular, we derive analytically the functional form of the distribution
function for a Plummer stellar sphere in a Hernquist dark halo, for \beta_0 =
-0.5 and for different degrees of embedding. This particular example satisfies
the condition that the central logarithmic slope of the light profile \gamma_0
> 2 \beta_0. Our models have velocity dispersion profiles similar to those
observed in nearby dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Hence they can be used to
generate initial conditions for a variety of problems, including N-body
simulations that may represent dwarf galaxies in the Local Group.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.4712 [pdf] - 1123543
Orbit-based dynamical models of the Sculptor dSph galaxy
Submitted: 2012-05-21, last modified: 2013-08-06
We have developed spherically symmetric dynamical models of dwarf spheroidal
galaxies using Schwarzschild's orbit superposition method. This type of
modelling yields constraints both on the total mass distribution (e.g. enclosed
mass and scale radius) as well as on the orbital structure of the system (e.g.
velocity anisotropy). This method is thus less prone to biases introduced by
assumptions in comparison to the more commonly used Jeans modelling, and it
allows us to derive the dark matter content in a robust way. Here we present
our results for the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal galaxy, after testing our methods
on mock data sets. We fit both the second and fourth velocity moment profile to
break the mass-anisotropy degeneracy. For an NFW dark matter halo profile, we
find that the mass of Sculptor within 1 kpc is M_1kpc = 1.03 \pm 0.07 x 10^8
Msol, and that its velocity anisotropy profile is tangentially biased and
nearly constant with radius. The preferred concentration (c ~ 15) is low for
its dark matter mass but consistent within the scatter found in N-body
cosmological simulations. When we let the value of the central logarithmic
slope \alpha{} vary, we find that the best-fit model has \alpha{} = 0, although
an NFW cusp or shallower is consistent at 1 \sigma{} confidence level. On the
other hand, very cuspy density profiles with logarithmic central slopes
\alpha{} < -1.5 are strongly disfavoured for Sculptor.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.5965 [pdf] - 1171588
Internal kinematics and dynamical models of dwarf spheroidal galaxies
around the Milky Way
Submitted: 2013-05-25
We review our current understanding of the internal dynamical properties of
the dwarf spheroidal galaxies surrounding the Milky Way. These are the most
dark matter dominated galaxies, and as such may be considered ideal
laboratories to test the current concordance cosmological model, and in
particular provide constraints on the nature of the dominant form of dark
matter. We discuss the latest observations of the kinematics of stars in these
systems, and how these may be used to derive their mass distribution. We tour
through the various dynamical techniques used, with emphasis on the
complementarity and limitations, and discuss what the results imply also in the
context of cosmological models. Finally we provide an outlook on exciting
developments in this field.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.2976 [pdf] - 1165875
Model comparison of the dark matter profiles of Fornax, Sculptor, Carina
and Sextans
Submitted: 2013-04-10
We use orbit based dynamical models to fit the 2nd and 4th moments of the
line of sight velocity distributions of the Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and
Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Our goal is to compare dark matter profile
models of these four systems using Bayesian evidence. We consider NFW, Einasto
and several cored profiles for their dark halos and present the probability
distribution functions of the model parameters. When considering each system
separately, we find there is no preference for one of these specific parametric
density profiles. However, the combined evidence shows that it is unlikely that
all galaxies are embedded in the same type of cored profiles of the form
\rho_{DM} \propto 1/(1 + r^2)^{\beta/2}, where \beta = 3, 4. For each galaxy,
we also obtain an almost model independent, and therefore accurate, measurement
of the logarithmic slope of the dark matter density distribution at a radius ~
r_{-3}, i.e. where the logarithmic slope of the stellar density profile is -3.
This slope ranges from ~ -1.4 for Fornax to ~ -1.1 for Sextans, both at ~ 1
kpc. All our best fit models essentially have the same mass distribution over a
large range in radius (from just below r_{-3} to the last measured data point).
This remarkable finding likely implies much stronger constraints on the
characteristics that subhalos extracted from cosmological simulations should
have in order to host the dSph galaxies around the Milky Way.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.6061 [pdf] - 1116937
Not too big, not too small: the dark halos of the dwarf spheroidals in
the Milky Way
Submitted: 2012-02-27, last modified: 2012-11-01
We present a new analysis of the Aquarius simulations done in combination
with a semi-analytic galaxy formation model. Our goal is to establish whether
the subhalos present in LCDM simulations of Milky Way-like systems could host
the dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellites of our Galaxy. Our analysis shows that,
contrary to what has been assumed in most previous work, the mass profiles of
subhalos are generally not well fit by NFW models but that Einasto profiles are
preferred. We find that for shape parameters alpha = 0.2 - 0.5 and Vmax = 10 -
30 km/s there is very good correspondence with the observational constraints
obtained for the nine brightest dSph of the Milky Way. However, to explain the
internal dynamics of these systems as well as the number of objects of a given
circular velocity the total mass of the Milky Way should be ~ 8x10^11 Msun, a
value that is in agreement with many recent determinations, and at the low mass
end of the range explored by the Aquarius simulations. Our simulations show
important scatter in the number of bright satellites, even when the Aquarius
Milky Way-like hosts are scaled to a common mass, and we find no evidence for a
missing population of massive subhalos in the Galaxy. This conclusion is also
supported when we examine the dynamics of the satellites of M31.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.4808 [pdf] - 1085055
Schwarzschild models of the Sculptor dSph galaxy
Submitted: 2011-10-21
We have developed a spherically symmetric dynamical model of a dwarf
spheroidal galaxy using the Schwarzschild method. This type of modelling yields
constraints both on the total mass distribution (e.g. enclosed mass and scale
radius) as well as on the orbital structure of the system modelled (e.g.
velocity anisotropy). Therefore not only can we derive the dark matter content
of these systems, but also explore possible formation scenarios. Here we
present preliminary results for the Sculptor dSph. We find that the mass of
Sculptor within 1kpc is 8.5\times10^(7\pm0.05) M\odot, its anisotropy profile
is tangentially biased and slightly more isotropic near the center. For an NFW
profile, the preferred concentration (~15) is compatible with cosmological
models. Very cuspy density profiles (steeper than NFW) are strongly disfavoured
for Sculptor.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.4411 [pdf] - 1453835
Distance determination for RAVE stars using stellar models II: Most
likely values assuming a standard stellar evolution scenario
Zwitter, T.;
Matijevič, G.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Smith, M. C.;
Helmi, A.;
Munari, U.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Binney, J.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Boeche, C.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Campbell, R.;
Freeman, K. C.;
Fulbright, J.;
Gibson, B.;
Gilmore, G.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Navarro, J. F.;
Parker, Q. A.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Siebert, A.;
Siviero, A.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Watson, F. G.;
Williams, M.;
Wyse, R. F. G.
Submitted: 2010-07-26, last modified: 2010-10-13
The RAdial Velocity Experiment (RAVE) is a spectroscopic survey of the Milky
Way. We use the subsample of spectra with spectroscopically determined values
of stellar parameters to determine the distances to these stars. The list
currently contains 235,064 high quality spectra which show no peculiarities and
belong to 210,872 different stars. The numbers will grow as the RAVE survey
progresses. The public version of the catalog will be made available through
the CDS services along with the ongoing RAVE public data releases.
The distances are determined with a method based on the work by Breddels et
al.~(2010). Here we assume that the star undergoes a standard stellar evolution
and that its spectrum shows no peculiarities. The refinements include: the use
of either of the three isochrone sets, a better account of the stellar ages and
masses, use of more realistic errors of stellar parameter values, and
application to a larger dataset. The derived distances of both dwarfs and
giants match within ~21% to the astrometric distances of Hipparcos stars and to
the distances of observed members of open and globular clusters. Multiple
observations of a fraction of RAVE stars show that repeatability of the derived
distances is even better, with half of the objects showing a distance scatter
of \simlt 11%.
RAVE dwarfs are ~300 pc from the Sun, and giants are at distances of 1 to 2
kpc, and up to 10 kpc. This places the RAVE dataset between the more local
Geneva-Copenhagen survey and the more distant and fainter SDSS sample. As such
it is ideal to address some of the fundamental questions of Galactic structure
and evolution in the pre-Gaia era. Individual applications are left to separate
papers, here we show that the full 6-dimensional information on position and
velocity is accurate enough to discuss the vertical structure and kinematic
properties of the thin and thick disks.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.2052 [pdf] - 1034879
Testing formation mechanisms of the Milky Way's thick disc with RAVE
Wilson, Michelle;
Helmi, Amina;
Morrison, H. L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Bienayme, O.;
Binney, J.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Campbell, R.;
Freeman, K. C.;
Fulbright, J. P.;
Gibson, B. K.;
Gilmore, G.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Munari, U.;
Navarro, J. F.;
Parker, Q. A.;
Reid, W.;
Seabroke, G.;
Siebert, A.;
Siviero, A.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Williams, M. E. K.;
Wyse, R. F. G.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2010-09-10
We study the eccentricity distribution of a thick disc sample of stars
observed in the Radial Velocity Experiment (RAVE) and compare it to that
expected in four simulations of thick disc formation in the literature
(accretion of satellites, heating of a primordial thin disc during a merger,
radial migration, and gas-rich mergers), as compiled by Sales et al. (2009). We
find that the distribution of our sample is peaked at low eccentricities and
falls off smoothly and rather steeply to high eccentricities. This distribution
is fairly robust to changes in distances, thin disc contamination, and the
particular thick disc sample used. Our results are inconsistent with what is
expected for the pure accretion simulation, since we find that the dynamics of
local thick disc stars implies that the majority must have formed "in situ". Of
the remaining models explored, the eccentricity distribution of our stars
appears to be most consistent with the gas-rich merger case.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0758 [pdf] - 1025502
Distance determination for RAVE stars using stellar models
Breddels, M. A.;
Smith, M. C.;
Helmi, A.;
Bienayme, O.;
Binney, J.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Boeche, C.;
Burnett, B. C. M.;
Campbell, R.;
Freeman, K. C.;
Gibson, B.;
Gilmore, G.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Munari, U.;
Navarro, J. F.;
Parker, Q. A.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Siebert, A.;
Siviero, A.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Watson, F. G.;
Williams, M.;
Wyse, R. F. G.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2010-03-03
(Abridged) Aims:We develop a method for deriving distances from spectroscopic
data and obtaining full 6D phase-space coordinates for the RAVE survey's second
data release. Methods: We used stellar models combined with atmospheric
properties from RAVE (Teff, logg and [Fe/H]) and (J-Ks) photometry from
archival sources to derive absolute magnitudes. We are able to derive the full
6D phase-space coordinates for a large sample of RAVE stars. This method is
tested with artificial data, Hipparcos trigonometric parallaxes and
observations of the open cluster M67. Results: When we applied our method to a
set of 16 146 stars, we found that 25% (4 037) of the stars have relative
(statistical) distance errors of < 35%, while 50% (8 073) and 75% (12 110) have
relative (statistical) errors smaller than 45% and 50%, respectively. Our
various tests show that we can reliably estimate distances for main-sequence
stars, but there is an indication of potential systematic problems with giant
stars. For the main-sequence star sample (defined as those with log(g) > 4),
25% (1 744) have relative distance errors < 31%, while 50% (3 488) and 75% (5
231) have relative errors smaller than 36% and 42%, respectively. Our full
dataset shows the expected decrease in the metallicity of stars as a function
of distance from the Galactic plane. The known kinematic substructures in the U
and V velocity components of nearby dwarf stars are apparent in our dataset,
confirming the accuracy of our data and the reliability of our technique. We
provide independent measurements of the orientation of the UV velocity
ellipsoid and of the solar motion, and they are in very good agreement with
previous work. Conclusions: The distance catalogue for the RAVE second data
release is available at http://www.astro.rug.nl/~rave