sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Braun, Chelsea

Normalized to: Braun, C.

1 article(s) in total. 2 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.01923  [pdf] - 1967056
Progenitors and Explosion Properties of Supernova Remnants Hosting Central Compact Objects: I. RCW 103 Associated with the Peculiar Source 1E 161348-5055
Comments: 21 pages, 11 figures, 6 tables; to appear in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-09-04
We present a Chandra and XMM-Newton imaging and spectroscopic study of the supernova remnant (SNR) RCW 103 (G332.4-00.4) containing the Central Compact Object 1E 161348-5055. The high resolution Chandra X-ray images reveal enhanced emission in the south-eastern and north-western regions. Equivalent width line images of Fe L, Mg, Si, and S using XMM-Newton data were used to map the distribution of ejecta. The SNR was sectioned into 56 regions best characterized by two-component thermal models. The harder component (kT~0.6 keV) is adequately fitted by the VPSHOCK non-equilibrium ionization model with an ionization timescale ~ 1E11-1E12 cm^-3 s, and slightly enhanced abundances over solar values. The soft component (kT~0.2 keV), fitted by the APEC model, is well described by plasma in collisional ionization equilibrium with abundances consistent with solar values. Assuming a distance of 3.1 kpc and a Sedov phase of expansion into a uniform medium, we estimate an SNR age of 4.4 kyr, a swept-up mass M_sw=16 f_s^{-1/2} D_{3.1}^{5/2} solar masses, and a low explosion energy E=3.7E49 f_s^{-1/2} D_{3.1}^{5/2} erg. This energy could be an order of magnitude higher if we relax the Sedov assumption, the plasma has a low filling factor, the plasma temperature is under-estimated, or if the SNR is expanding into the progenitor's wind-blown bubble. Standard explosion models did not match the ejecta yields. By comparing the fitted abundances to the most recent core-collapse nucleosynthesis models, our best estimate yields a low-mass progenitor around 12-13 solar masses, lower than previously reported. We discuss degeneracies in the model fitting, particularly the effect of altering the explosion energy on the progenitor mass estimate.