Normalized to: Brás, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.11141 [pdf] - 2070172
An Effective Field Theory Analysis of the First LUX Dark Matter Search
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2020-03-24
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter search was a 250-kg active mass
dual-phase time projection chamber that operated by detecting light and
ionization signals from particles incident on a xenon target. In December 2015,
LUX reported a minimum 90% upper C.L. of 6e-46 cm^2 on the spin-independent
WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering cross section based on a 1.4e4 kg*day exposure
in its first science run. Tension between experiments and the absence of a
definitive positive detection suggest it would be prudent to search for WIMPs
outside the standard spin-independent/spin-dependent paradigm. Recent
theoretical work has identified a complete basis of 14 independent effective
field theory (EFT) operators to describe WIMP-nucleon interactions. In addition
to spin-independent and spin-dependent nuclear responses, these operators can
produce novel responses such as angular-momentum-dependent and spin-orbit
couplings. Here we report on a search for all 14 of these EFT couplings with
data from LUX's first science run. Limits are placed on each coupling as a
function of WIMP mass.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06272 [pdf] - 2050176
Extending light WIMP searches to single scintillation photons in LUX
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Grace, E.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazka, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Levy, C.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
López-Paredes, B.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2019-07-14, last modified: 2019-12-27
We present a novel analysis technique for liquid xenon time projection
chambers that allows for a lower threshold by relying on events with a prompt
scintillation signal consisting of single detected photons. The energy
threshold of the LUX dark matter experiment is primarily determined by the
smallest scintillation response detectable, which previously required a 2-fold
coincidence signal in its photomultiplier arrays, enforced in data analysis.
The technique presented here exploits the double photoelectron emission effect
observed in some photomultiplier models at vacuum ultraviolet wavelengths. We
demonstrate this analysis using an electron recoil calibration dataset and
place new constraints on the spin-independent scattering cross section of
weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) down to 2.5 GeV/c$^2$ WIMP mass
using the 2013 LUX dataset. This new technique is promising to enhance light
WIMP and astrophysical neutrino searches in next-generation liquid xenon
experiments.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.06039 [pdf] - 2061504
Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) dark matter experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Alsum, S. K.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Arthurs, M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Balashov, S.;
Bauer, D.;
Belle, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Benson, T.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boast, K. E.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V. V.;
Burdin, S.;
Busenitz, J. K.;
Carels, C.;
Carlsmith, D. L.;
Carlson, B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cherwinka, J. J.;
Cole, A.;
Cottle, A.;
Craddock, W. W.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Dahl, C. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edberg, T. K.;
Edwards, W. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fayer, S.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Fruth, T.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
van der Grinten, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hans, S.;
Hanzel, K.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hillbrand, S.;
Hjemfelt, C.;
Hoff, M. D.;
Hor, J. Y-K.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ji, W.;
Kaboth, A. C.;
Kamdin, K.;
Keefner, J.;
Khaitan, D.;
Khazov, A.;
Kim, Y. D.;
Kocher, C. D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kraus, H.;
Krebs, H. J.;
Kreczko, L.;
Krikler, B.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Kyre, S.;
Lee, J.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Leonard, D. S.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Levy, C.;
Li, J.;
Liao, J.;
Liao, F. -T.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Linehan, R.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Liu, X.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Paredes, B. López;
Lorenzon, W.;
Luitz, S.;
Lyle, J. M.;
Majewski, P.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Maupin, C.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Meng, Y.;
Miller, E. H.;
Mock, J.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morad, J. A.;
Morrison, E.;
Mount, B. J.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nikoleyczik, J.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Olcina, I.;
Olevitch, M. A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Patton, S. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Penning, B.;
Piepke, A.;
Powell, S.;
Preece, R. M.;
Pushkin, K.;
Ratcliff, B. N.;
Reichenbacher, J.;
Rhyne, C. A.;
Richards, A.;
Rodrigues, J. P.;
Rosero, R.;
Rossiter, P.;
Saba, J. S.;
Sarychev, M.;
Schnee, R. W.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scovell, P. R.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silk, J. J.;
Silva, C.;
Skarpaas, K.;
Skulski, W.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stancu, I.;
Stark, M. R.;
Stiegler, T. M.;
Stifter, K.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Temples, D.;
Terman, P. A.;
Thomas, K. J.;
Timalsina, M.;
To, W. H.;
Tomás, A.;
Tope, T. E.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tull, C. E.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Va'vra, J.;
Vacheret, A.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Voirin, E.;
Waldron, W. L.;
Watson, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, D. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Wisniewski, W. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Worm, S. D.;
Yeh, M.;
Yin, J.;
Young, I.
Submitted: 2018-02-16, last modified: 2019-12-02
LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) is a next generation dark matter direct detection experiment
that will operate 4850 feet underground at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility (SURF) in Lead, South Dakota, USA. Using a two-phase xenon detector
with an active mass of 7 tonnes, LZ will search primarily for low-energy
interactions with Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), which are
hypothesized to make up the dark matter in our galactic halo. In this paper,
the projected WIMP sensitivity of LZ is presented based on the latest
background estimates and simulations of the detector. For a 1000 live day run
using a 5.6 tonne fiducial mass, LZ is projected to exclude at 90% confidence
level spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections above $1.6 \times 10^{-48}$
cm$^{2}$ for a 40 $\mathrm{GeV}/c^{2}$ mass WIMP. Additionally, a $5\sigma$
discovery potential is projected reaching cross sections below the existing and
projected exclusion limits of similar experiments that are currently operating.
For spin-dependent WIMP-neutron(-proton) scattering, a sensitivity of $2.7
\times 10^{-43}$ cm$^{2}$ ($8.1 \times 10^{-42}$ cm$^{2}$) for a 40
$\mathrm{GeV}/c^{2}$ mass WIMP is expected. With underground installation well
underway, LZ is on track for commissioning at SURF in 2020.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.11241 [pdf] - 1981692
Results of a Search for Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using 2013 LUX Data
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2018-11-27, last modified: 2019-10-16
The scattering of dark matter (DM) particles with sub-GeV masses off nuclei
is difficult to detect using liquid xenon-based DM search instruments because
the energy transfer during nuclear recoils is smaller than the typical detector
threshold. However, the tree-level DM-nucleus scattering diagram can be
accompanied by simultaneous emission of a Bremsstrahlung photon or a so-called
"Migdal" electron. These provide an electron recoil component to the
experimental signature at higher energies than the corresponding nuclear
recoil. The presence of this signature allows liquid xenon detectors to use
both the scintillation and the ionization signals in the analysis where the
nuclear recoil signal would not be otherwise visible. We report constraints on
spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering for DM particles with masses of 0.4-5
GeV/c$^2$ using 1.4$\times10^4$ kg$\cdot$day of search exposure from the 2013
data from the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment for four different
classes of mediators. This analysis extends the reach of liquid xenon-based DM
search instruments to lower DM masses than has been achieved previously.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12372 [pdf] - 1916847
Improved Measurements of the \b{eta}-Decay Response of Liquid Xenon with
the LUX Detector
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-06-07
We report results from an extensive set of measurements of the \b{eta}-decay
response in liquid xenon.These measurements are derived from high-statistics
calibration data from injected sources of both $^{3}$H and $^{14}$C in the LUX
detector. The mean light-to-charge ratio is reported for 13 electric field
values ranging from 43 to 491 V/cm, and for energies ranging from 1.5 to 145
keV.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07113 [pdf] - 1758152
Search for annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2018-07-18, last modified: 2018-09-27
Various dark matter models predict annual and diurnal modulations of dark
matter interaction rates in Earth-based experiments as a result of the Earth's
motion in the halo. Observation of such features can provide generic evidence
for detection of dark matter interactions. This paper reports a search for both
annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX dark matter experiment using
over 20 calendar months of data acquired between 2013 and 2016. This search
focuses on electron recoil events at low energies, where leptophilic dark
matter interactions are expected to occur and where the DAMA experiment has
observed a strong rate modulation for over two decades. By using the innermost
volume of the LUX detector and developing robust cuts and corrections, we
obtained a stable event rate of 2.3$\pm$0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne, which
is among the lowest in all dark matter experiments. No statistically
significant annual modulation was observed in energy windows up to
26~keV$_{\text{ee}}$. Between 2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$, this analysis
demonstrates the most sensitive annual modulation search up to date, with
9.2$\sigma$ tension with the DAMA/LIBRA result. We also report no observation
of diurnal modulations above 0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne amplitude between
2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00800 [pdf] - 1611913
Ultra-Low Energy Calibration of LUX Detector using $^{127}$Xe Electron
Capture
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-09-03
We report an absolute calibration of the ionization yields($\textit{Q$_y$})$
and fluctuations for electronic recoil events in liquid xenon at discrete
energies between 186 eV and 33.2 keV. The average electric field applied across
the liquid xenon target is 180 V/cm. The data are obtained using low energy
$^{127}$Xe electron capture decay events from the 95.0-day first run from LUX
(WS2013) in search of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). The
sequence of gamma-ray and X-ray cascades associated with $^{127}$I
de-excitations produces clearly identified 2-vertex events in the LUX detector.
We observe the K- (binding energy, 33.2 keV), L- (5.2 keV), M- (1.1 keV), and
N- (186 eV) shell cascade events and verify that the relative ratio of observed
events for each shell agrees with calculations. The N-shell cascade analysis
includes single extracted electron (SE) events and represents the lowest-energy
electronic recoil $\textit{in situ}$ measurements that have been explored in
liquid xenon.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02297 [pdf] - 1582421
First Searches for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with the LUX
Experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Aquino, C.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-04-07, last modified: 2017-06-30
The first searches for axions and axion-like particles with the Large
Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment are presented. Under the assumption of an
axio-electric interaction in xenon, the coupling constant between axions and
electrons, gAe is tested, using data collected in 2013 with an exposure
totalling 95 live-days $\times$ 118 kg. A double-sided, profile likelihood
ratio statistic test excludes gAe larger than 3.5 $\times$ 10$^{-12}$ (90%
C.L.) for solar axions. Assuming the DFSZ theoretical description, the upper
limit in coupling corresponds to an upper limit on axion mass of 0.12
eV/c$^{2}$, while for the KSVZ description masses above 36.6 eV/c$^{2}$ are
excluded. For galactic axion-like particles, values of gAe larger than 4.2
$\times$ 10$^{-13}$ are excluded for particle masses in the range 1-16
keV/c$^{2}$. These are the most stringent constraints to date for these
interactions.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.03380 [pdf] - 1583256
Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the
complete LUX exposure
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-05-09, last modified: 2017-06-23
We present experimental constraints on the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon
elastic cross sections from the total 129.5 kg-year exposure acquired by the
Large Underground Xenon experiment (LUX), operating at the Sanford Underground
Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota (USA). A profile likelihood ratio
analysis allows 90% CL upper limits to be set on the WIMP-neutron (WIMP-proton)
cross section of $\sigma_n$ = 1.6$\times 10^{-41}$ cm$^{2}$ ($\sigma_p$ =
5$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^{2}$) at 35 GeV$c^{-2}$, almost a sixfold improvement
over the previous LUX spin-dependent results. The spin-dependent WIMP-neutron
limit is the most sensitive constraint to date.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.07648 [pdf] - 1531370
Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bramante, R.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2016-08-26, last modified: 2017-01-13
We report constraints on spin-independent weakly interacting massive particle
(WIMP)-nucleon scattering using a 3.35e4 kg-day exposure of the Large
Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment. A dual-phase xenon time projection chamber
with 250 kg of active mass is operated at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility under Lead, South Dakota (USA). With roughly fourfold improvement in
sensitivity for high WIMP masses relative to our previous results, this search
yields no evidence of WIMP nuclear recoils. At a WIMP mass of 50 GeV/c^2,
WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross sections above 2.2e-46 cm^2 are excluded at
the 90% confidence level. When combined with the previously reported LUX
exposure, this exclusion strengthens to 1.1e-46 cm^2 at 50 GeV/c^2.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.05381 [pdf] - 1503451
Low-energy (0.7-74 keV) nuclear recoil calibration of the LUX dark
matter experiment using D-D neutron scattering kinematics
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C. A.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2016-08-18, last modified: 2016-10-26
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment is a dual-phase liquid xenon
time projection chamber (TPC) operating at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility in Lead, South Dakota. A calibration of nuclear recoils in liquid
xenon was performed $\textit{in situ}$ in the LUX detector using a collimated
beam of mono-energetic 2.45 MeV neutrons produced by a deuterium-deuterium
(D-D) fusion source. The nuclear recoil energy from the first neutron scatter
in the TPC was reconstructed using the measured scattering angle defined by
double-scatter neutron events within the active xenon volume. We measured the
absolute charge ($Q_{y}$) and light ($L_{y}$) yields at an average electric
field of 180 V/cm for nuclear recoil energies spanning 0.7 to 74 keV and 1.1 to
74 keV, respectively. This calibration of the nuclear recoil signal yields will
permit the further refinement of liquid xenon nuclear recoil signal models and,
importantly for dark matter searches, clearly demonstrates measured ionization
and scintillation signals in this medium at recoil energies down to
$\mathcal{O}$(1 keV).