Normalized to: Boynton, W.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.10080 [pdf] - 1773128
Overcoming the Challenges Associated with Image-based Mapping of Small
Bodies in Preparation for the OSIRIS-REx Mission to (101955) Bennu
DellaGiustina, D. N.;
Bennett, C. A.;
Becker, K.;
Golish, D. R;
Corre, L. Le;
Cook, D. A.;
Edmundson, K. L.;
Chojnacki, M.;
Sutton, S. S.;
Milazzo, M. P.;
Carcich, B.;
Nolan, M. C.;
Habib, N.;
Burke, K. N.;
Becker, T.;
Smith, P. H.;
Walsh, K. J.;
Getzandanner, K.;
Wibben, D. R.;
Leonard, J. M.;
Westermann, M. M.;
Polit, A. T.;
Kidd, J. N.;
Hergenrother, C. W.;
Boynton, W. V.;
Backer, J.;
Sides, S.;
Mapel, J.;
Berry, K.;
Roper, H.;
d'Aubigny, C. Drouet;
Rizk, B.;
Crombie, M. K.;
Kinney-Spano, E. K.;
de Leon, J.;
Rizos, J. L.;
Licandro, J.;
Campins, H. C.;
Clark, B. E.;
Enos, H. L.;
Lauretta, D. S.
Submitted: 2018-10-23
The OSIRIS-REx Asteroid Sample Return Mission is the third mission in NASA's
New Frontiers Program and is the first U.S. mission to return samples from an
asteroid to Earth. The most important decision ahead of the OSIRIS-REx team is
the selection of a prime sample-site on the surface of asteroid (101955) Bennu.
Mission success hinges on identifying a site that is safe and has regolith that
can readily be ingested by the spacecraft's sampling mechanism. To inform this
mission-critical decision, the surface of Bennu is mapped using the OSIRIS-REx
Camera Suite and the images are used to develop several foundational data
products. Acquiring the necessary inputs to these data products requires
observational strategies that are defined specifically to overcome the
challenges associated with mapping a small irregular body. We present these
strategies in the context of assessing candidate sample-sites at Bennu
according to a framework of decisions regarding the relative safety,
sampleability, and scientific value across the asteroid's surface. To create
data products that aid these assessments, we describe the best practices
developed by the OSIRIS-REx team for image-based mapping of irregular small
bodies. We emphasize the importance of using 3D shape models and the ability to
work in body-fixed rectangular coordinates when dealing with planetary surfaces
that cannot be uniquely addressed by body-fixed latitude and longitude.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.06981 [pdf] - 1581595
OSIRIS-REx: Sample Return from Asteroid (101955) Bennu
Lauretta, D. S.;
Balram-Knutson, S. S.;
Beshore, E.;
Boynton, W. V.;
dAubigny, C. Drouet;
DellaGiustina, D. N.;
Enos, H. L.;
Gholish, D. R.;
Hergenrother, C. W.;
Howell, E. S.;
Johnson, C. A.;
Morton, E. T.;
Nolan, M. C.;
Rizk, B.;
Roper, H. L.;
Bartels, A. E.;
Bos, B. J.;
Dworkin, J. P.;
Highsmith, D. E.;
Lorenz, D. A.;
Lim, L. F.;
Mink, R.;
Moreau, M. C.;
Nuth, J. A.;
Reuter, D. C.;
Simon, A. A.;
Bierhaus, E. B.;
Bryan, B. H.;
Ballouz, R.;
Barnouin, O. S.;
Binzel, R. P.;
Bottke, W. F.;
Hamilton, V. E.;
Walsh, K. J.;
Chesley, S. R.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clark, B. E.;
Connolly, H. C.;
Crombie, M. K.;
Daly, M. G.;
Emery, J. P.;
McCoy, T. J.;
McMahon, J. W.;
Scheeres, D. J.;
Messenger, S.;
Nakamura-Messenger, K.;
Righter, K.;
Sandford, S. A.
Submitted: 2017-02-22
In May of 2011, NASA selected the Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource
Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) asteroid sample
return mission as the third mission in the New Frontiers program. The other two
New Frontiers missions are New Horizons, which explored Pluto during a flyby in
July 2015 and is on its way for a flyby of Kuiper Belt object 2014 MU69 on Jan.
1, 2019, and Juno, an orbiting mission that is studying the origin, evolution,
and internal structure of Jupiter. The spacecraft departed for near-Earth
asteroid (101955) Bennu aboard an United Launch Alliance Atlas V 411 evolved
expendable launch vehicle at 7:05 p.m. EDT on September 8, 2016, on a
seven-year journey to return samples from Bennu. The spacecraft is on an
outbound-cruise trajectory that will result in a rendezvous with Bennu in
August 2018. The science instruments on the spacecraft will survey Bennu to
measure its physical, geological, and chemical properties, and the team will
use these data to select a site on the surface to collect at least 60 g of
asteroid regolith. The team will also analyze the remote-sensing data to
perform a detailed study of the sample site for context, assess Bennus resource
potential, refine estimates of its impact probability with Earth, and provide
ground-truth data for the extensive astronomical data set collected on this
asteroid. The spacecraft will leave Bennu in 2021 and return the sample to the
Utah Test and Training Range (UTTR) on September 24, 2023.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.09442 [pdf] - 1553888
Modeling Orbital Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Experiments at Carbonaceous
Asteroids
Submitted: 2016-09-29
To evaluate the feasibility of measuring differences in bulk composition
among carbonaceous meteorite parent bodies from an asteroid or comet orbiter,
we present the results of a performance simulation of an orbital gamma-ray
spectroscopy ("GRS") experiment in a Dawn-like orbit around spherical model
asteroids with a range of carbonaceous compositions. The orbital altitude was
held equal to the asteroid radius for 4.5 months. Both the asteroid gamma-ray
spectrum and the spacecraft background flux were calculated using the MCNPX
Monte-Carlo code. GRS is sensitive to depths below the optical surface (to
~20--50 cm depth depending on material density). This technique can therefore
measure underlying compositions beneath a sulfur-depleted (e.g., Nittler et al.
2001) or desiccated surface layer. We find that 3\sigma\ uncertainties of under
1 wt% are achievable for H, C, O, Si, S, Fe, and Cl for five carbonaceous
meteorite compositions using the heritage Mars Odyssey GRS design in a
spacecraft- deck-mounted configuration at the Odyssey end-of-mission energy
resolution, FWHM = 5.7 keV at 1332 keV. The calculated compositional
uncertainties are smaller than the compositional differences between
carbonaceous chondrite subclasses.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01264 [pdf] - 1447654
Investigation of Primordial Black Hole Bursts using Interplanetary
Network Gamma-ray Bursts
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Hurley, K.;
MacGibbon, J. H;
Svinkin, D. S;
Aptekar, R. L;
Golenetskii, S. V;
Frederiks, D. D;
Pal'shin, V. D;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Kozyrev, A. S;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohmori, N.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A;
McTiernan, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-03, last modified: 2016-04-27
The detection of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in the solar neighborhood would have
very important implications for GRB phenomenology. The leading theories for
cosmological GRBs would not be able to explain such events. The final bursts of
evaporating Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), however, would be a natural
explanation for local GRBs. We present a novel technique that can constrain the
distance to gamma-ray bursts using detections from widely separated,
non-imaging spacecraft. This method can determine the actual distance to the
burst if it is local. We applied this method to constrain distances to a sample
of 36 short duration GRBs detected by the Interplanetary Network (IPN) that
show observational properties that are expected from PBH evaporations. These
bursts have minimum possible distances in the 10^13-10^18 cm (7-10^5 AU) range,
consistent with the expected PBH energetics and with a possible origin in the
solar neighborhood, although none of the bursts can be unambiguously
demonstrated to be local. Assuming these bursts are real PBH events, we
estimate lower limits on the PBH burst evaporation rate in the solar
neighborhood.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.5237 [pdf] - 1209648
Optical Follow-Up Observations of PTF10qts, a Luminous Broad-Lined Type
Ic Supernova Found by the Palomar Transient Factory
Walker, E. S.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Pian, E.;
Hurley, K.;
Arcavi, I.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Horesh, A.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Poznanski, D.;
Silverman, J. M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Ofek, E.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Ohno, M.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Zhang, X. L-.
Submitted: 2014-05-20
We present optical photometry and spectroscopy of the broad-lined Type Ic
supernova (SNIc-BL) PTF10qts, which was discovered as part of the Palomar
Transient Factory. The supernova was located in a dwarf galaxy of magnitude
$r=21.1$ at a redshift $z=0.0907$. We find that the $R$-band light curve is a
poor proxy for bolometric data and use photometric and spectroscopic data to
construct and constrain the bolometric light curve. The derived bolometric
magnitude at maximum light is $M_{\rm bol} = -18.51\pm0.2$ mag, comparable to
that of SN 1998bw ($M_{\rm bol} = -18.7$ mag) which was associated with a
gamma-ray burst (GRB). PTF10qts is one of the most luminous SNIc-BL observed
without an accompanying GRB. We estimate the physical parameters of the
explosion using data from our programme of follow-up observations, finding that
it produced a larger mass of radioactive nickel compared to other SNeIc-BL with
similar inferred ejecta masses and kinetic energies. The progenitor of the
event was likely a $\sim20$M$_{\odot}$ star.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5734 [pdf] - 755152
The ultraluminous GRB 110918A
Frederiks, D. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Mangano, V.;
Oates, S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Kokomov, A. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
Starr, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Goldstein, J.
Submitted: 2013-11-22
GRB 110918A is the brightest long GRB detected by Konus-WIND during its 19
years of continuous observations and the most luminous GRB ever observed since
the beginning of the cosmological era in 1997. We report on the final IPN
localization of this event and its detailed multiwavelength study with a number
of space-based instruments. The prompt emission is characterized by a typical
duration, a moderare $E_{peak}$ of the time-integrated spectrum, and strong
hard-to-soft evolution. The high observed energy fluence yields, at z=0.984, a
huge isotropic-equivalent energy release $E_{iso}=(2.1\pm0.1)\times10^{54}$
erg. The record-breaking energy flux observed at the peak of the short, bright,
hard initial pulse results in an unprecedented isotropic-equivalent luminosity
$L_{iso}=(4.7\pm0.2)\times10^{54}$erg s$^{-1}$. A tail of the soft gamma-ray
emission was detected with temporal and spectral behavior typical of that
predicted by the synchrotron forward-shock model. Swift/XRT and Swift/UVOT
observed the bright afterglow from 1.2 to 48 days after the burst and revealed
no evidence of a jet break. The post-break scenario for the afterglow is
preferred from our analysis, with a hard underlying electron spectrum and
ISM-like circumburst environment implied. We conclude that, among multiple
reasons investigated, the tight collimation of the jet must have been a key
ingredient to produce this unusually bright burst. The inferred jet opening
angle of 1.7-3.4 deg results in reasonable values of the collimation-corrected
radiated energy and the peak luminosity, which, however, are still at the top
of their distributions for such tightly collimated events. We estimate a
detection horizon for a similar ultraluminous GRB of $z\sim7.5$ for Konus-WIND,
and $z\sim12$ for Swift/BAT, which stresses the importance of GRBs as probes of
the early Universe.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4829 [pdf] - 616849
Extremely long hard bursts observed by Konus-Wind
Pal'shin, V.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Mazets, E.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Hurley, K.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Oleynik, P.;
Ulanov, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.
Submitted: 2013-01-21
We report the observations of the prompt emission of the extremely long hard
burst, GRB 060814B, discovered by Konus-Wind and localized by the IPN. The
observations reveal a smooth, hard, ~40-min long pulse followed by weaker
emission seen several hours after the burst onset. We also present the
Konus-Wind data on similar burst, GRB 971208, localized by BATSE/IPN. And
finally we discuss the different possible origins of these unusual events.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.2363 [pdf] - 563775
SN 2010ay is a Luminous and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova within a
Low-metallicity Host Galaxy
Sanders, Nathan E.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Valenti, S.;
Foley, R. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Berger, E.;
Smartt, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Narayan, G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Terada, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Grav, T.;
Heasley, J. N.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Jedicke, R.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Luppino, G. A.;
Lupton, R. H.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Monet, D. G.;
Morgan, J. S.;
Onaka, P. M.;
Price, P. A.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waterson, M. F.
Submitted: 2011-10-11, last modified: 2012-04-05
We report on our serendipitous pre-discovery detection and detailed follow-up
of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova (SN) 2010ay at z = 0.067 imaged by the
Pan-STARRS1 3pi survey just ~4 days after explosion. The SN had a peak
luminosity, M_R ~ -20.2 mag, significantly more luminous than known GRB-SNe and
one of the most luminous SNe Ib/c ever discovered. The absorption velocity of
SN 2010ay is v_Si ~ 19,000 km/s at ~40 days after explosion, 2-5 times higher
than other broad-lined SNe and similar to the GRB-SN 2010bh at comparable
epochs. Moreover, the velocity declines ~2 times slower than other SNe Ic-BL
and GRB-SNe. Assuming that the optical emission is powered by radioactive
decay, the peak magnitude implies the synthesis of an unusually large mass of
56 Ni, M_Ni = 0.9 M_solar. Modeling of the light-curve points to a total ejecta
mass, M_ej ~ 4.7 M_sol, and total kinetic energy, E_K ~ 11x10^51 ergs. The
ratio of M_Ni to M_ej is ~2 times as large for SN 2010ay as typical GRB-SNe and
may suggest an additional energy reservoir. The metallicity (log(O/H)_PP04 + 12
= 8.19) of the explosion site within the host galaxy places SN 2010ay in the
low-metallicity regime populated by GRB-SNe, and ~0.5(0.2) dex lower than that
typically measured for the host environments of normal (broad-lined) Ic
supernovae. We constrain any gamma-ray emission with E_gamma < 6x10^{48} erg
(25-150 keV) and our deep radio follow-up observations with the Expanded Very
Large Array rule out relativistic ejecta with energy, E > 10^48 erg. We
therefore rule out the association of a relativistic outflow like those which
accompanied SN 1998bw and traditional long-duration GRBs, but place
less-stringent constraints on a weak afterglow like that seen from XRF 060218.
These observations challenge the importance of progenitor metallicity for the
production of a GRB, and suggest that other parameters also play a key role.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0741 [pdf] - 1116376
Inverse Compton X-ray Emission from Supernovae with Compact Progenitors:
Application to SN2011fe
Margutti, R.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Chevalier, R.;
Hurley, K.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Hughes, J. P.;
Slane, P.;
Fransson, C.;
Moe, M.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Costa, E.;
Cummings, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Enos, H.;
Fellows, C.;
Feroci, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harshman, K.;
Krimm, H.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Makishima, K.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Murakami, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Starr, R.;
Svinkin, D.
Submitted: 2012-02-03
We present a generalized analytic formalism for the inverse Compton X-ray
emission from hydrogen-poor supernovae and apply this framework to SN2011fe
using Swift-XRT, UVOT and Chandra observations. We characterize the optical
properties of SN2011fe in the Swift bands and find them to be broadly
consistent with a "normal" SN Ia, however, no X-ray source is detected by
either XRT or Chandra. We constrain the progenitor system mass loss rate to be
lower than 2x10^-9 M_sun/yr (3sigma c.l.) for wind velocity v_w=100 km/s. Our
result rules out symbiotic binary progenitors for SN2011fe and argues against
Roche-lobe overflowing subgiants and main sequence secondary stars if >1% of
the transferred mass is lost at the Lagrangian points. Regardless of the
density profile, the X-ray non-detections are suggestive of a clean environment
(particle density < 150 cm-3) for (2x10^15<R<5x10^16) cm around the progenitor
site. This is either consistent with the bulk of material being confined within
the binary system or with a significant delay between mass loss and supernova
explosion. We furthermore combine X-ray and radio limits from Chomiuk et al.
2012 to constrain the post shock energy density in magnetic fields. Finally, we
searched for the shock breakout pulse using gamma-ray observations from the
Interplanetary Network and find no compelling evidence for a
supernova-associated burst. Based on the compact radius of the progenitor star
we estimate that the shock break out pulse was likely not detectable by current
satellites.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.4208 [pdf] - 1051604
PTF 10bzf (SN 2010ah): a broad-line Ic supernova discovered by the
Palomar Transient Factory
Corsi, A.;
Ofek, E. O.;
Frail, D. A.;
Poznanski, D.;
Arcavi, I.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Howell, D. A.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Green, Y.;
Murray, D.;
Sullivan, M.;
Xu, D.;
Ben-ami, S.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Law, N. M.;
Nugent, P.;
Quimby, R. M.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Cummings, J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Rau, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Goldsten, J.
Submitted: 2011-01-21, last modified: 2011-08-31
We present the discovery and follow-up observations of a broad-line type-Ic
supernova (SN), PTF 10bzf (SN 2010ah), detected by the Palomar Transient
Factory (PTF) on 2010 February 23. The SN distance is \cong 218 Mpc, greater
than GRB 980425 / SN 1998bw and GRB 060218 / SN 2006aj, but smaller than the
other SNe firmly associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We conducted a
multi-wavelength follow-up campaign with Palomar-48 inch, Palomar 60-inch,
Gemini-N, Keck, Wise, Swift, the Allen Telescope Array, CARMA, WSRT, and EVLA.
Here we compare the properties of PTF 10bzf with those of SN 1998bw and other
broad-line SNe. The optical luminosity and spectral properties of PTF 10bzf
suggest that this SN is intermediate, in kinetic energy and amount of 56Ni,
between non GRB-associated SNe like 2002ap or 1997ef, and GRB-associated SNe
like 1998bw. No X-ray or radio counterpart to PTF 10bzf was detected. X-ray
upper-limits allow us to exclude the presence of an underlying X-ray afterglow
as luminous as that of other SN-associated GRBs like GRB 030329 or GRB 031203.
Early-time radio upper-limits do not show evidence for mildly-relativistic
ejecta. Late-time radio upper-limits rule out the presence of an underlying
off-axis GRB, with energy and wind density similar to the SN-associated GRB
030329 and GRB 031203. Finally, by performing a search for a GRB in the time
window and at the position of PTF 10bzf, we find that no GRB in the IPN catalog
could be associated with this SN.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605726 [pdf] - 400117
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BATSE 5B Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Boynton, W.;
Starr, R.;
McNutt, R.;
Boer, M.
Submitted: 2006-05-30, last modified: 2011-08-18
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) localization information for 343
gamma-ray bursts observed by the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE)
between the end of the 4th BATSE catalog and the end of the Compton Gamma-Ray
Observatory (CGRO) mission, obtained by analyzing the arrival times of these
bursts at the Ulysses, Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR), and CGRO
spacecraft. For any given burst observed by CGRO and one other spacecraft,
arrival time analysis (or "triangulation") results in an annulus of possible
arrival directions whose half-width varies between 11 arcseconds and 21
degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and arrival direction of the
burst,as well as the distance between the spacecraft. This annulus generally
intersects the BATSE error circle, resulting in an average reduction of the
area of a factor of 20. When all three spacecraft observe a burst, the result
is an error box whose area varies between 1 and 48000 square arcminutes,
resulting in an average reduction of the BATSE error circle area of a factor of
87.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4079 [pdf] - 1941794
Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts from Six Magnetars
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acerneseac, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G. S.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Amin, R. S.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Antonuccia, F.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astonea, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S.;
Baroneac, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barriga, P.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Bastiab, A.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauera, Th. S.;
Behnke, B.;
Bekera, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belletoile, A.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birindellia, S.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossia, M.;
Bizouarda, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Bloma, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondub, F.;
Bonelliab, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschia, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosia, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Boyle, M.;
Braccinia, S.;
Bradaschiaa, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brilleta, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brissona, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brummit, A.;
Budzyńskib, R.;
Bulikbc, T.;
Bultenab, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnolia, G.;
Cain, J.;
Calloniab, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campagnaab, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavaliera, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cellaa, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarinib, E.;
Chaibia, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chalkley, E.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Clevaa, F.;
Cocciaab, E.;
Colacinoab, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Collaab, A.;
Colombinib, M.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsia, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulona, J. -P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Culter, R. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonioa, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Das, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Daviera, M.;
Davies, G.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosaab, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
del Preteac, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiorea, L.;
Di Lietoab, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilioac, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilioa, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Dorsher, S.;
Douglas, E. S. D.;
Dragocd, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafoneab, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferranteab, I.;
Fidecaroab, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fortea, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fourniera, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frascaab, S.;
Frasconia, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoniab, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garofoli, J. A.;
Garufiab, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennaia, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazottoa, A.;
Gill, C.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greveriea, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidiab, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hage, B.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayaub, J. -F.;
Hayler, T.;
Heefner, J.;
Heitmann, H.;
Helloa, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Jaranowskid, P.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kells, W.;
Kelner, M.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, N.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kopparapu, R.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalskab, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królakae, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Leong, J.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroya, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Lia, T. G. F.;
Liguoriab, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzinia, M.;
Lorietteb, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdoa, G.;
Lu, P.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majoranaa, E.;
Maksimovicb, I.;
Mana, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovaniac, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesonia, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelliab, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
Meadors, G.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merill, L.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milanoab, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkova, Y.;
Mino, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Moesta, P.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgiaab, A.;
Moscaab, S.;
Moscatellia, V.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nash, T.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Neriab, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oldenburg, R. G.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Pagliaroliac, G.;
Palladinoac, L.;
Palombaa, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paolettia, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parameswaran, A.;
Pardiab, S.;
Parisiab, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquietiab, R.;
Passuelloa, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pathak, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Peralta, C.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichettiab, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichota, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanniab, F.;
Pietkad, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Podkaminer, J.;
Poggianiab, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodiab, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturoa, M.;
Puppoa, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabelingab, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C. R.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnaniab, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Reab, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbaua, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricciab, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Roberts, P.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robineta, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchia, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romanoac, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińskacf, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sakata, S.;
Sakosky, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Salit, M.;
Sammut, L.;
de la Jordana, L. Sancho;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Saraf, S.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Satterthwaite, M.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Searle, A. C.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Weerathunga, T. Shihan;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandioab, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturaniab, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szokoly, G. P.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Titsler, C.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toncelliab, A.;
Tonelliab, M.;
Torreac, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travassoab, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trias, M.;
Tseng, K.;
Turner, L.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urbanek, K.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vaishnav, B.;
Vajenteab, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brandab, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Puttena, S.;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidisa, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovatoc, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetranoab, F.;
Viceréab, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vineta, J. -Y.;
Voccaa, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Wasa, M.;
Wei, P.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wen, S.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, H. R.;
Williams, L.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, Z.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Boynton, W. V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cline, T. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J. O;
Golovin, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Kaneko, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Lin, L.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Ohno, M.;
Palshin, V. D.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Terada, Y.;
Yamaoka, K.
Submitted: 2010-11-17, last modified: 2011-04-15
Soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are thought to
be magnetars: neutron stars powered by extreme magnetic fields. These rare
objects are characterized by repeated and sometimes spectacular gamma-ray
bursts. The burst mechanism might involve crustal fractures and excitation of
non-radial modes which would emit gravitational waves (GWs). We present the
results of a search for GW bursts from six galactic magnetars that is sensitive
to neutron star f-modes, thought to be the most efficient GW emitting
oscillatory modes in compact stars. One of them, SGR 0501+4516, is likely ~1
kpc from Earth, an order of magnitude closer than magnetars targeted in
previous GW searches. A second, AXP 1E 1547.0-5408, gave a burst with an
estimated isotropic energy >10^{44} erg which is comparable to the giant
flares. We find no evidence of GWs associated with a sample of 1279
electromagnetic triggers from six magnetars occurring between November 2006 and
June 2009, in GW data from the LIGO, Virgo, and GEO600 detectors. Our lowest
model-dependent GW emission energy upper limits for band- and time-limited
white noise bursts in the detector sensitive band, and for f-mode ringdowns (at
1090 Hz), are 3.0x10^{44} d_1^2 erg and 1.4x10^{47} d_1^2 erg respectively,
where d_1 = d_{0501} / 1 kpc and d_{0501} is the distance to SGR 0501+4516.
These limits on GW emission from f-modes are an order of magnitude lower than
any previous, and approach the range of electromagnetic energies seen in SGR
giant flares for the first time.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2709 [pdf] - 231069
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the HETE-2 Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalog
Hurley, K.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Barthelmy, K. Harshman S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, C. E.;
Rossi, F.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, R. Starr J.;
Gold, R.
Submitted: 2009-07-15, last modified: 2010-09-22
Between 2000 November and 2006 May, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network (IPN) detected 226 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were
also detected by the FREGATE experiment aboard the HETE-II spacecraft. During
this period, the IPN consisted of up to nine spacecraft, and using
triangulation, the localizations of 157 bursts were obtained. We present the
IPN localization data on these events.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.1650 [pdf] - 1026226
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalogs
Hurley, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.
Submitted: 2010-04-09
Between 1996 July and 2002 April, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network detected 787 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were also
detected by the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and/or Wide-Field X-Ray Camera
experiments aboard the BeppoSAX spacecraft. During this period, the network
consisted of up to six spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations
of 475 bursts were obtained. We present the localization data for these events.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2462 [pdf] - 1002894
A new analysis of the short-duration, hard-spectrum GRB 051103, a
possible extragalactic SGR giant flare
Hurley, K.;
Rowlinson, A.;
Bellm, E.;
Perley, D.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshmann, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Nakagawa, Y. E.;
Smith, D. M.;
Cline, T.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Wiersema, K.;
Rol, E.;
Levan, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Fruchter, A.;
Bersier, D.;
Kavelaars, J. J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Duncan, R. C.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Ricker, G.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2009-07-14, last modified: 2009-11-23
GRB 051103 is considered to be a candidate soft gamma repeater (SGR)
extragalactic giant magnetar flare by virtue of its proximity on the sky to
M81/M82, as well as its time history, localization, and energy spectrum. We
have derived a refined interplanetary network localization for this burst which
reduces the size of the error box by over a factor of two. We examine its time
history for evidence of a periodic component, which would be one signature of
an SGR giant flare, and conclude that this component is neither detected nor
detectable under reasonable assumptions. We analyze the time-resolved energy
spectra of this event with improved time- and energy resolution, and conclude
that although the spectrum is very hard, its temporal evolution at late times
cannot be determined, which further complicates the giant flare association. We
also present new optical observations reaching limiting magnitudes of R > 24.5,
about 4 magnitudes deeper than previously reported. In tandem with
serendipitous observations of M81 taken immediately before and one month after
the burst, these place strong constraints on any rapidly variable sources in
the region of the refined error ellipse proximate to M81. We do not find any
convincing afterglow candidates from either background galaxies or sources in
M81, although within the refined error region we do locate two UV bright star
forming regions which may host SGRs. A supernova remnant (SNR) within the error
ellipse could provide further support for an SGR giant flare association, but
we were unable to identify any SNR within the error ellipse. These data still
do not allow strong constraints on the nature of the GRB 051103 progenitor, and
suggest that candidate extragalactic SGR giant flares will be difficult,
although not impossible, to confirm.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.1230 [pdf] - 133420
AGILE detection of delayed gamma-ray emission from GRB 080514B
Giuliani, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Fornari, F.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Esposito, P.;
Perotti, F.;
Tavani, M.;
Argan, A.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Boffelli, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Caraveo, P.;
Cattaneo, P. W.;
Chen, A. W.;
Costa, E.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Fiorini, M.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Gianotti, F.;
Labanti, C.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Lipari, P.;
Longo, F.;
Morselli, A.;
Pacciani, L.;
Pellizzoni, A.;
Piano, G.;
Picozza, P.;
Prest, M.;
Pucella, G.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Rappoldi, A.;
Soffitta, P.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Trois, A.;
Vallazza, E.;
Vercellone, S.;
Zanello, D.;
Salotti, L.;
Cutini, S.;
Pittori, C.;
Preger, B.;
Santolamazza, P.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Page, K.;
Burrows, D.;
Rossi, A.;
Hurley, K.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Boynton, W.
Submitted: 2008-09-08
GRB 080514B is the first gamma ray burst (GRB), since the time of EGRET, for
which individual photons of energy above several tens of MeV have been detected
with a pair-conversion tracker telescope. This burst was discovered with the
Italian AGILE gamma-ray satellite. The GRB was localized with a cooperation by
AGILE and the interplanetary network (IPN). The gamma-ray imager (GRID)
estimate of the position, obtained before the SuperAGILE-IPN localization, is
found to be consistent with the burst position. The hard X-ray emission
observed by SuperAGILE lasted about 7 s, while there is evidence that the
emission above 30 MeV extends for a longer duration (at least ~13 s). Similar
behavior was seen in the past from a few other GRBs observed with EGRET.
However, the latter measurements were affected, during the brightest phases, by
instrumental dead time effects, resulting in only lower limits to the burst
intensity. Thanks to the small dead time of the AGILE/GRID we could assess that
in the case of GRB 080514B the gamma-ray to X-ray flux ratio changes
significantly between the prompt and extended emission phase.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508379 [pdf] - 75268
Mars Odyssey Joins The Third Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Grinkov, V.;
Charyshnikov, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Hamara, D.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2005-08-17
The Mars Odyssey spacecraft carries two experiments which are capable of
detecting cosmic gamma-ray bursts and soft gamma repeaters. Since April 2001
they have detected over 275 bursts and, in conjunction with the other
spacecraft of the interplanetary network, localized many of them rapidly and
precisely enough to allow sensitive multi-wavelength counterpart searches. We
present the Mars Odyssey mission and describe the burst capabilities of the two
experiments in detail. We explain how the spacecraft timing and ephemeris have
been verified in-flight using bursts from objects whose precise positions are
known by other means. Finally, we show several examples of localizations and
discuss future plans for the Odyssey mission and the network as a whole.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502329 [pdf] - 71120
An exceptionally bright flare from SGR1806-20 and the origins of
short-duration gamma-ray bursts
Hurley, K.;
Boggs, S. E.;
Smith, D. M.;
Duncan, R. C.;
Lin, R.;
Zoglauer, A.;
Krucker, S.;
Hurford, G.;
Hudson, H.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Thompson, C.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Lichti, G.;
Rau, A.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2005-02-16, last modified: 2005-05-11
Soft-gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are galactic X-ray stars that emit numerous
short-duration (about 0.1 s) bursts of hard X-rays during sporadic active
periods. They are thought to be magnetars: strongly magnetized neutron stars
with emissions powered by the dissipation of magnetic energy. Here we report
the detection of a long (380 s) giant flare from SGR 1806-20, which was much
more luminous than any previous transient event observed in our Galaxy. (In the
first 0.2 s, the flare released as much energy as the Sun radiates in a quarter
of a million years.) Its power can be explained by a catastrophic instability
involving global crust failure and magnetic reconnection on a magnetar, with
possible large-scale untwisting of magnetic field lines outside the star. From
a great distance this event would appear to be a short-duration, hard-spectrum
cosmic gamma-ray burst. At least a significant fraction of the mysterious
short-duration gamma-ray bursts therefore may come from extragalactic
magnetars.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208008 [pdf] - 50824
Discovery of GRB 020405 and its Late Red Bump
Price, P. A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. W.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Frail, D. A.;
Galama, T. J.;
Harrison, F. A.;
McCarthy, P.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Sari, R.;
Yost, S. A.;
Jerjen, H.;
Flint, K.;
Phillips, A.;
Warren, B. E.;
Axelrod, T. S.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Holtzman, J.;
Kimble, R. A.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Wheeler, J. C.;
Frontera, F.;
Costa, E.;
Piro, L.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Montanari, E.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Ofek, E.;
Lipkin, Y.
Submitted: 2002-07-31, last modified: 2003-02-19
We present the discovery of GRB 020405 made with the Inter-Planetary Network
(IPN). With a duration of 60 s, the burst appears to be a typical long duration
event. We observed the 75-square acrminute IPN error region with the Mount
Stromlo Observatory's 50-inch robotic telescope and discovered a transient
source which subsequently decayed and was also associated with a variable radio
source. We identify this source as the afterglow of GRB 020405. Subsequent
observations by other groups found varying polarized flux and established a
redshift of 0.690 to the host galaxy. Motivated by the low redshift we
triggered observations with WFPC2 on-board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST).
Modeling the early ground-based data with a jet model, we find a clear red
excess over the decaying optical lightcurves that is present between day 10 and
day 141 (the last HST epoch). This `bump' has the spectral and temporal
features expected of an underlying supernova (SN). In particular, the red color
of the putative SN is similar to that of the SN associated with GRB 011121, at
late time. Restricting the sample of GRBs to those with z<0.7, a total of five
bursts, red bumps at late times are found in GRB 970228, GRB 011121, and GRB
020405. It is possible that the simplest idea, namely that all long duration
GRBs have underlying SNe with a modest dispersion in their properties
(especially peak luminosity), is sufficient to explain the non detections.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0206151 [pdf] - 49782
HETE-2 Localization and Observations of the Short, Hard Gamma-Ray Burst
GRB020531
Lamb, D. Q.;
Ricker, G. R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Hurley, K.;
Kawai, N.;
Shirasaki, Y.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Tamagawa, T.;
Graziani, C.;
Olive, J. -F.;
Yoshida, A.;
Matsuoka, M.;
Torii, K.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Galassi, M.;
Tavenner, T.;
Donaghy, T. Q.;
Boer, M.;
Dezalay, J. -P.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Crew, G.;
Doty, J.;
Monnelly, G.;
Villasenor, J.;
Butler, N.;
Jernigan, J. G.;
Levine, A.;
Martel, F.;
Morgan, E.;
Prigozhin, G.;
Woosley, S. E.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.;
Braga, J.;
Manchanda, R.;
Pizzichini, G.;
Takagishi, K.;
Yamauchi, M.
Submitted: 2002-06-10, last modified: 2002-06-11
The {\it HETE-2} (hereafter \HETE) French Gamma Telescope (FREGATE) and the
Wide-field X-ray Monitor (WXM) instruments detected a short ($t_{50} = 360$
msec in the FREGATE 85-300 keV energy band), hard gamma-ray burst (GRB) that
occurred at 1578.72 SOD (00:26:18.72 UT) on 31 May 2002. The WXM flight
localization software produced a valid location in spacecraft (relative)
coordinates. However, since no on-board real-time star camera aspect was
available, an absolute localization could not be disseminated. A preliminary
localization was reported as a GCN Position Notice at 01:54:22 UT, 88 min after
the burst. Further ground analysis produced a refined localization, which can
be expressed as a 90% confidence rectangle that is 67 arcminutes in RA and 43
arcminutes in Dec (90% confidence region), centered at RA = +15$^{\rm h}$
14$^{\rm m}$ 45$^{\rm s}$, Dec = -19$^\circ$ 21\arcmin 35\arcsec (J2000). An
IPN localization of the burst was disseminated 18 hours after the GRB (Hurley
et al. 2002b). A refined IPN localization was disseminated $\approx$ 5 days
after the burst. This hexagonal-shaped localization error region is centered on
RA = 15$^{\rm h}$ 15$^{\rm m}$ 03.57$^{\rm s}$, -19$^\circ$ 24\arcmin
51.00\arcsec (J2000), and has an area of $\approx$ 22 square arcminutes (99.7%
confidence region). The prompt localization of this short, hard GRB by \HETE
and the anti-Sun pointing of the \HETE instruments, coupled with the refinement
of the localization by the IPN, has made possible rapid follow-up observations
of the burst at radio, optical, and X-ray wavelengths.
