Normalized to: Bowles, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09840 [pdf] - 1964130
Small Bodies Science with Twinkle
Submitted: 2019-03-23, last modified: 2019-09-19
Twinkle is an upcoming 0.45m space-based telescope equipped with a visible
and two near-infrared spectrometers covering the spectral range 0.4 to
4.5{\mu}m with a resolving power R~250 ({\lambda}<2.42{\mu}m) and R~60
({\lambda}>2.42{\mu}m). We explore Twinkle's capabilities for small bodies
science and find that, given Twinkle's sensitivity, pointing stability, and
spectral range, the mission can observe a large number of small bodies. The
sensitivity of Twinkle is calculated and compared to the flux from an object of
a given visible magnitude. The number, and brightness, of asteroids and comets
that enter Twinkle's field of regard is studied over three time periods of up
to a decade. We find that, over a decade, several thousand asteroids enter
Twinkle's field of regard with a brightness and non-sidereal rate that will
allow Twinkle to characterise them at the instrumentation's native resolution
with SNR > 100. Hundreds of comets can also be observed. Therefore, Twinkle
offers researchers the opportunity to contribute significantly to the field of
Solar System small bodies research.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09842 [pdf] - 1854954
Remote-sensing Characterisation of Major Solar System Bodies with the
Twinkle Space Telescope
Submitted: 2019-03-23
Remote-sensing observations of Solar System objects with a space telescope
offer a key method of understanding celestial bodies and contributing to
planetary formation and evolution theories. The capabilities of Twinkle, a
space telescope in a low Earth orbit with a 0.45m mirror, to acquire
spectroscopic data of Solar System targets in the visible and infrared are
assessed. Twinkle is a general observatory that provides on demand observations
of a wide variety of targets within wavelength ranges that are currently not
accessible using other space telescopes or that are accessible only to
oversubscribed observatories in the short-term future. We determine the periods
for which numerous Solar System objects could be observed and find that Solar
System objects are regularly observable. The photon flux of major bodies is
determined for comparison to the sensitivity and saturation limits of Twinkle's
instrumentation and we find that the satellite's capability varies across the
three spectral bands (0.4-1, 1.3-2.42, and 2.42-4.5{\mu}m). We find that for a
number of targets, including the outer planets, their large moons, and bright
asteroids, the model created predicts that with short exposure times,
high-resolution spectra (R~250, {\lambda} < 2.42{\mu}m; R~60, {\lambda} >
2.42{\mu}m) could be obtained with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of >100 with
exposure times of <300s.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.05383 [pdf] - 1800056
Analysis of gaseous ammonia (NH$_3$) absorption in the visible spectrum
of Jupiter - Update
Submitted: 2018-12-13
An analysis of currently available ammonia (NH$_3$) visible-to-near-infrared
gas absorption data was recently undertaken by Irwin et al. (Icarus, 302 (2018)
426) to help interpret Very Large Telescope (VLT) MUSE observations of Jupiter
from 0.48 - 0.93 $\mu$m, made in support of the NASA/Juno mission. Since this
analysis a newly revised set of ammonia line data, covering the previously
poorly constrained range 0.5 - 0.833 $\mu$m, has been released by the ExoMol
project, "C2018" (Coles et al., JQSRT 219, 199 - 122, 2018), which demonstrates
significant advantages over previously available data sets, and providing for
the first time complete line data for the previously poorly constrained 5520-
and 6475-\AA\ bands of NH$_3$. In this paper we compare spectra calculated
using the ExoMol-C2018 data set (Coles et al., JQSRT 219, 199 - 122, 2018) with
spectra calculated from previous sources to demonstrate its advantages. We
conclude that at the present time the ExoMol-C2018 dataset provides the most
reliable ammonia absorption source for analysing low- to medium-resolution
spectra of Jupiter in the visible/near-IR spectral range, but note that the
data are less able to model high-resolution spectra owing to small, but
significant inaccuracies in the line wavenumber estimates. This work is of
significance not only for solar system planetary physics, but for future
proposed observations of Jupiter-like planets orbiting other stars, such as
with NASA's planned Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.10191 [pdf] - 1762889
CASTAway: An Asteroid Main Belt Tour and Survey
Bowles, N. E.;
Snodgrass, C.;
Gibbings, A;
Sanchez, J. P.;
Arnold, J. A.;
Eccleston, P.;
Andert, T.;
Probst, A.;
Naletto, G.;
Vandaele, A. C.;
de Leon, J.;
Nathues, A.;
Thomas, I. R.;
Thomas, N.;
Jorda, L.;
Da Deppo, V.;
Haack, H.;
Green, S. F.;
Carry, B.;
Hanna, K. L. Donaldson;
Jorgensen, J. Leif;
Kereszturi, A.;
DeMeo, F. E.;
Patel, M. R.;
Davies, J. K.;
Clarke, F.;
Kinch, K.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Agarwal, J.;
Rivkin, A. S.;
Pravec, P.;
Fornasier, S.;
Granvik, M.;
Jones, R. H.;
Murdoch, N.;
Joy, K. H.;
Pascale, E.;
Tecza, M.;
Barnes, J. M.;
Licandro, J.;
Greenhagen, B. T.;
Calcutt, S. B.;
Marriner, C. M.;
Warren, T.;
Tosh, I.
Submitted: 2017-10-27
CASTAway is a mission concept to explore our Solar System's main asteroid
belt. Asteroids and comets provide a window into the formation and evolution of
our Solar System and the composition of these objects can be inferred from
space-based remote sensing using spectroscopic techniques. Variations in
composition across the asteroid populations provide a tracer for the dynamical
evolution of the Solar System. The mission combines a long-range (point source)
telescopic survey of over 10,000 objects, targeted close encounters with 10 to
20 asteroids and serendipitous searches to constrain the distribution of
smaller (e.g. 10 m) size objects into a single concept. With a carefully
targeted trajectory that loops through the asteroid belt, CASTAway would
provide a comprehensive survey of the main belt at multiple scales. The
scientific payload comprises a 50 cm diameter telescope that includes an
integrated low-resolution (R = 30 to 100) spectrometer and visible context
imager, a thermal (e.g. 6 to 16 microns) imager for use during the flybys, and
modified star tracker cameras to detect small (approx. 10 m) asteroids. The
CASTAway spacecraft and payload have high levels of technology readiness and
are designed to fit within the programmatic and cost caps for a European Space
Agency medium class mission, whilst delivering a significant increase in
knowledge of our Solar System.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.03405 [pdf] - 1762882
The Castalia Mission to Main Belt Comet 133P/Elst-Pizarro
Snodgrass, C.;
Jones, G. H.;
Boehnhardt, H.;
Gibbings, A.;
Homeister, M.;
Andre, N.;
Beck, P.;
Bentley, M. S.;
Bertini, I.;
Bowles, N.;
Capria, M. T.;
Carr, C.;
Ceriotti, M.;
Coates, A. J.;
Della Corte, V.;
Hanna, K. L. Donaldson;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Gutierrez, P. J.;
Hainaut, O. R.;
Herique, A.;
Hilchenbach, M.;
Hsieh, H. H.;
Jehin, E.;
Karatekin, O.;
Kofman, W.;
Lara, L. M.;
Laudan, K.;
Licandro, J.;
Lowry, S. C.;
Marzari, F.;
Masters, A.;
Meech, K. J.;
Moreno, F.;
Morse, A.;
Orosei, R.;
Pack, A.;
Plettemeier, D.;
Prialnik, D.;
Rotundi, A.;
Rubin, M.;
Sanchez, J. P.;
Sheridan, S.;
Trieloff, M.;
Winterboer, A.
Submitted: 2017-09-11
We describe Castalia, a proposed mission to rendezvous with a Main Belt Comet
(MBC), 133P/Elst-Pizarro. MBCs are a recently discovered population of
apparently icy bodies within the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter,
which may represent the remnants of the population which supplied the early
Earth with water. Castalia will perform the first exploration of this
population by characterising 133P in detail, solving the puzzle of the MBC's
activity, and making the first in situ measurements of water in the asteroid
belt. In many ways a successor to ESA's highly successful Rosetta mission,
Castalia will allow direct comparison between very different classes of comet,
including measuring critical isotope ratios, plasma and dust properties. It
will also feature the first radar system to visit a minor body, mapping the ice
in the interior. Castalia was proposed, in slightly different versions, to the
ESA M4 and M5 calls within the Cosmic Vision programme. We describe the science
motivation for the mission, the measurements required to achieve the scientific
goals, and the proposed instrument payload and spacecraft to achieve these.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05747 [pdf] - 1323351
The EChO science case
Tinetti, Giovanna;
Drossart, Pierre;
Eccleston, Paul;
Hartogh, Paul;
Isaak, Kate;
Linder, Martin;
Lovis, Christophe;
Micela, Giusi;
Ollivier, Marc;
Puig, Ludovic;
Ribas, Ignasi;
Snellen, Ignas;
Allard, Bruce Swinyard. France;
Barstow, Joanna;
Cho, James;
Coustenis, Athena;
Cockell, Charles;
Correia, Alexandre;
Decin, Leen;
de Kok, Remco;
Deroo, Pieter;
Encrenaz, Therese;
Forget, Francois;
Glasse, Alistair;
Griffith, Caitlin;
Guillot, Tristan;
Koskinen, Tommi;
Lammer, Helmut;
Leconte, Jeremy;
Maxted, Pierre;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Nelson, Richard;
North, Chris;
Pallé, Enric;
Pagano, Isabella;
Piccioni, Guseppe;
Pinfield, David;
Selsis, Franck;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Stixrude, Lars;
Tennyson, Jonathan;
Turrini, Diego;
Beaulieu, Mariarosa Zapatero-Osorio. Jean-Philippe;
Grodent, Denis;
Guedel, Manuel;
Luz, David;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, Hans Ulrik;
Ray, Tom;
Rickman, Hans;
Selig, Avri;
Banaszkiewicz, Mark Swain. Marek;
Barlow, Mike;
Bowles, Neil;
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Gerard, Jean-Claude;
Gizon, Laurent;
Hornstrup, Allan;
Jarchow, Christopher;
Kerschbaum, Franz;
Kovacs, Géza;
Lagage, Pierre-Olivier;
Lim, Tanya;
Lopez-Morales, Mercedes;
Malaguti, Giuseppe;
Pace, Emanuele;
Pascale, Enzo;
Vandenbussche, Bart;
Wright, Gillian;
Adriani, Gonzalo Ramos Zapata. Alberto;
Azzollini, Ruymán;
Balado, Ana;
Bryson, Ian;
Burston, Raymond;
Colomé, Josep;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Crook, Martin;
Di Giorgio, Anna;
Griffin, Matt;
Hoogeveen, Ruud;
Ottensamer, Roland;
Irshad, Ranah;
Middleton, Kevin;
Morgante, Gianluca;
Pinsard, Frederic;
Rataj, Mirek;
Reess, Jean-Michel;
Savini, Giorgio;
Schrader, Jan-Rutger;
Stamper, Richard;
Abe, Berend Winter. L.;
Abreu, M.;
Achilleos, N.;
Ade, P.;
Adybekian, V.;
Affer, L.;
Agnor, C.;
Agundez, M.;
Alard, C.;
Alcala, J.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Floriano, F. J. Alonso;
Altieri, F.;
Iglesias, C. A. Alvarez;
Amado, P.;
Andersen, A.;
Aylward, A.;
Baffa, C.;
Bakos, G.;
Ballerini, P.;
Banaszkiewicz, M.;
Barber, R. J.;
Barrado, D.;
Barton, E. J.;
Batista, V.;
Bellucci, G.;
Avilés, J. A. Belmonte;
Berry, D.;
Bézard, B.;
Biondi, D.;
Błęcka, M.;
Boisse, I.;
Bonfond, B.;
Bordé, P.;
Börner, P.;
Bouy, H.;
Brown, L.;
Buchhave, L.;
Budaj, J.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Burleigh, M.;
Cabral, A.;
Capria, M. T.;
Cassan, A.;
Cavarroc, C.;
Cecchi-Pestellini, C.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chadney, J.;
Chamberlain, S.;
Charnoz, S.;
Jessen, N. Christian;
Ciaravella, A.;
Claret, A.;
Claudi, R.;
Coates, A.;
Cole, R.;
Collura, A.;
Cordier, D.;
Covino, E.;
Danielski, C.;
Damasso, M.;
Deeg, H. J.;
Delgado-Mena, E.;
Del Vecchio, C.;
Demangeon, O.;
De Sio, A.;
De Wit, J.;
Dobrijévic, M.;
Doel, P.;
Dominic, C.;
Dorfi, E.;
Eales, S.;
Eiroa, C.;
Contreras, M. Espinoza;
Esposito, M.;
Eymet, V.;
Fabrizio, N.;
Fernández, M.;
Castella, B. Femenía;
Figueira, P.;
Filacchione, G.;
Fletcher, L.;
Focardi, M.;
Fossey, S.;
Fouqué, P.;
Frith, J.;
Galand, M.;
Gambicorti, L.;
Gaulme, P.;
López, R. J. García;
Garcia-Piquer, A.;
Gear, W.;
Gerard, J. -C.;
Gesa, L.;
Giani, E.;
Gianotti, F.;
Gillon, M.;
Giro, E.;
Giuranna, M.;
Gomez, H.;
Gomez-Leal, I.;
Hernandez, J. Gonzalez;
Merino, B. González;
Graczyk, R.;
Grassi, D.;
Guardia, J.;
Guio, P.;
Gustin, J.;
Hargrave, P.;
Haigh, J.;
Hébrard, E.;
Heiter, U.;
Heredero, R. L.;
Herrero, E.;
Hersant, F.;
Heyrovsky, D.;
Hollis, M.;
Hubert, B.;
Hueso, R.;
Israelian, G.;
Iro, N.;
Irwin, P.;
Jacquemoud, S.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, H.;
Justtanont, K.;
Kehoe, T.;
Kerschbaum, F.;
Kerins, E.;
Kervella, P.;
Kipping, D.;
Koskinen, T.;
Krupp, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Laken, B.;
Lanza, N.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leto, G.;
Goldaracena, J. Licandro;
Lithgow-Bertelloni, C.;
Liu, S. J.;
Cicero, U. Lo;
Lodieu, N.;
Lognonné, P.;
Lopez-Puertas, M.;
Lopez-Valverde, M. A.;
Rasmussen, I. Lundgaard;
Luntzer, A.;
Machado, P.;
MacTavish, C.;
Maggio, A.;
Maillard, J. -P.;
Magnes, W.;
Maldonado, J.;
Mall, U.;
Marquette, J. -B.;
Mauskopf, P.;
Massi, F.;
Maurin, A. -S.;
Medvedev, A.;
Michaut, C.;
Miles-Paez, P.;
Montalto, M.;
Rodríguez, P. Montañés;
Monteiro, M.;
Montes, D.;
Morais, H.;
Morales, J. C.;
Morales-Calderón, M.;
Morello, G.;
Martín, A. Moro;
Moses, J.;
Bedon, A. Moya;
Alcaino, F. Murgas;
Oliva, E.;
Orton, G.;
Palla, F.;
Pancrazzi, M.;
Pantin, E.;
Parmentier, V.;
Parviainen, H.;
Ramírez, K. Y. Peña;
Peralta, J.;
Perez-Hoyos, S.;
Petrov, R.;
Pezzuto, S.;
Pietrzak, R.;
Pilat-Lohinger, E.;
Piskunov, N.;
Prinja, R.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Polichtchouk, I.;
Poretti, E.;
Radioti, A.;
Ramos, A. A.;
Rank-Lüftinger, T.;
Read, P.;
Readorn, K.;
López, R. Rebolo;
Rebordão, J.;
Rengel, M.;
Rezac, L.;
Rocchetto, M.;
Rodler, F.;
Béjar, V. J. Sánchez;
Lavega, A. Sanchez;
Sanromá, E.;
Santos, N.;
Forcada, J. Sanz;
Scandariato, G.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Scholz, A.;
Scuderi, S.;
Sethenadh, J.;
Shore, S.;
Showman, A.;
Sicardy, B.;
Sitek, P.;
Smith, A.;
Soret, L.;
Sousa, S.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stolarski, M.;
Strazzulla, G.;
Tabernero, H. M;
Tanga, P.;
Tecsa, M.;
Temple, J.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tessenyi, M.;
Testi, L.;
Thompson, S.;
Thrastarson, H.;
Tingley, B. W.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Torres, J. Martín;
Tozzi, A.;
Turrini, D.;
Varley, R.;
Vakili, F.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Valdivieso, M. L.;
Venot, O.;
Villaver, E.;
Vinatier, S.;
Viti, S.;
Waldmann, I.;
Waltham, D.;
Ward-Thompson, D.;
Waters, R.;
Watkins, C.;
Watson, D.;
Wawer, P.;
Wawrzaszk, A.;
White, G.;
Widemann, T.;
Winek, W.;
Wiśniowski, T.;
Yelle, R.;
Yung, Y.;
Yurchenko, S. N.
Submitted: 2015-02-19
The discovery of almost 2000 exoplanets has revealed an unexpectedly diverse
planet population. Observations to date have shown that our Solar System is
certainly not representative of the general population of planets in our Milky
Way. The key science questions that urgently need addressing are therefore:
What are exoplanets made of? Why are planets as they are? What causes the
exceptional diversity observed as compared to the Solar System?
EChO (Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory) has been designed as a
dedicated survey mission for transit and eclipse spectroscopy capable of
observing a large and diverse planet sample within its four-year mission
lifetime. EChO can target the atmospheres of super-Earths, Neptune-like, and
Jupiter-like planets, in the very hot to temperate zones (planet temperatures
of 300K-3000K) of F to M-type host stars. Over the next ten years, several new
ground- and space-based transit surveys will come on-line (e.g. NGTS, CHEOPS,
TESS, PLATO), which will specifically focus on finding bright, nearby systems.
The current rapid rate of discovery would allow the target list to be further
optimised in the years prior to EChO's launch and enable the atmospheric
characterisation of hundreds of planets. Placing the satellite at L2 provides a
cold and stable thermal environment, as well as a large field of regard to
allow efficient time-critical observation of targets randomly distributed over
the sky. A 1m class telescope is sufficiently large to achieve the necessary
spectro-photometric precision. The spectral coverage (0.5-11 micron, goal 16
micron) and SNR to be achieved by EChO, thanks to its high stability and
dedicated design, would enable a very accurate measurement of the atmospheric
composition and structure of hundreds of exoplanets.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.3914 [pdf] - 1216351
The Transit Spectra of Earth and Jupiter
Submitted: 2014-08-18
In recent years, a number of observations have been made of the transits of
'Hot Jupiters', such as HD 189733b, which have been modelled to derive
atmospheric structure and composition. As measurement techniques improve, the
transit spectra of 'Super-Earths' such as GJ 1214b are becoming better
constrained, allowing model atmospheres to be fitted for this class of planet
also. While it is not yet possible to constrain the atmospheric states of small
planets such as the Earth or cold planets like Jupiter, this may become
practical in the coming decades and if so, it is of interest to determine what
we might infer from such measurements. Here we have constructed atmospheric
models of the Solar System planets from 0.4 - 15.5 microns that are consistent
with ground-based and satellite observations and from these calculate the
primary transit and secondary eclipse spectra (with respect to the Sun and
typical M-dwarfs) that would be observed by a 'remote observer', many light
years away. From these spectra we test what current retrieval models might
infer about their atmospheres and compare these with the 'ground truths' in
order to assess: a) the inherent uncertainties in transit spectra observations;
b) the relative merits of primary transit and secondary eclipse spectra; and c)
the advantages of directly imaged spectra. We find that secondary eclipses
would not give sufficient information, but that primary transits give much
better determination. We find that a single transit of Jupiter in front of the
Sun could potentially be used to determine temperature and stratospheric
composition, but for the Earth the mean atmospheric composition could only be
determined if it were orbiting an M-dwarf. For both planets we note that direct
imaging with sufficient nulling of the light from the parent star provides the
best method of determining the atmospheric properties of such planets.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.3579 [pdf] - 828495
Exoplanet atmospheres with EChO: spectral retrievals using EChOSim
Submitted: 2014-05-14, last modified: 2014-05-28
We demonstrate the effectiveness of the Exoplanet Characterisation
Observatory mission concept for constraining the atmospheric properties of hot
and warm gas giants and super Earths. Synthetic primary and secondary transit
spectra for a range of planets are passed through EChOSim (Waldmann & Pascale
2014) to obtain the expected level of noise for different observational
scenarios; these are then used as inputs for the NEMESIS atmospheric retrieval
code and the retrieved atmospheric properties (temperature structure,
composition and cloud properties) compared with the known input values,
following the method of Barstow et al. (2013a). To correctly retrieve the
temperature structure and composition of the atmosphere to within 2 {\sigma},
we find that we require: a single transit or eclipse of a hot Jupiter orbiting
a sun-like (G2) star at 35 pc to constrain the terminator and dayside
atmospheres; 20 transits or eclipses of a warm Jupiter orbiting a similar star;
10 transits/eclipses of a hot Neptune orbiting an M dwarf at 6 pc; and 30
transits or eclipses of a GJ1214b-like planet.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.5020 [pdf] - 606394
On the potential of the EChO mission to characterise gas giant
atmospheres
Submitted: 2012-12-20
Space telescopes such as EChO (Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory) and
JWST (James Webb Space Telescope) will be important for the future study of
extrasolar planet atmospheres. Both of these missions are capable of performing
high sensitivity spectroscopic measurements at moderate resolutions in the
visible and infrared, which will allow the characterisation of atmospheric
properties using primary and secondary transit spectroscopy. We use the NEMESIS
radiative transfer and retrieval tool (Irwin et al. 2008, Lee et al. 2012) to
explore the potential of the proposed EChO mission to solve the retrieval
problem for a range of H2-He planets orbiting different stars. We find that
EChO should be capable of retrieving temperature structure to ~200 K precision
and detecting H2O, CO2 and CH4 from a single eclipse measurement for a hot
Jupiter orbiting a Sun-like star and a hot Neptune orbiting an M star, also
providing upper limits on CO and NH3. We provide a table of retrieval
precisions for these quantities in each test case. We expect around 30
Jupiter-sized planets to be observable by EChO; hot Neptunes orbiting M dwarfs
are rarer, but we anticipate observations of at least one similar planet.