sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Bouley, S.

Normalized to: Bouley, S.

6 article(s) in total. 260 co-authors, from 1 to 5 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 6,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1911.09555  [pdf] - 2041336
A Case Study of the May 30th, 2017 Italian Fireball
Comments: 19 pages, 17 figures. Accepted for publication in The European Physical Journal PLUS
Submitted: 2019-11-21, last modified: 2020-02-02
On May 30th, 2017 at about 21h 09m 17s UTC a green bright fireball crossed the sky of north-eastern Italy. The fireball path was observed from some all-sky cameras starting from a mean altitude of $81.1 \pm 0.2$ km (Lat. $44.369^{\circ} \pm 0.002^{\circ}$ N; Long. $11.859^{\circ} \pm 0.002^{\circ}$ E) and extinct at $23.3 \pm 0.2$ km (Lat. $45.246^{\circ} \pm 0.002^{\circ}$ N; Long. $12.046^{\circ} \pm 0.002^{\circ}$ E), between the Italian cities of Venice and Padua. In this paper, on the basis of simple physical models, we will compute the atmospheric trajectory, analize the meteoroid atmospheric dynamics, the dark flight phase (with the strewn field) and compute the best heliocentric orbit of the progenitor body. Search for meteorites on the ground has not produced any results so far.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.05203  [pdf] - 1666224
Fine-scale observations of the Doppler frequency shifts affecting meteor head radio echoes
Comments: International Meteor Conference 2017
Submitted: 2018-04-14
The French FRIPON (Fireball Recovery and Interplanetary Observation Network) programme relies on a video cameras network associated to radio sensors running in a radar multistatic configuration to observe fireballs and to determine meteoroid accurate orbits and potential meteorites strewnfields. This paper focuses on some peculiar phenomena observed with radio means during the final phase of the meteors flight
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.04699  [pdf] - 1694021
Probing the use of spectroscopy to determine the meteoritic analogues of meteors
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-02-13, last modified: 2018-02-15
Determining the source regions of meteorites is one of the major goals of current research in planetary science. Whereas asteroid observations are currently unable to pinpoint the source regions of most meteorite classes, observations of meteors with camera networks and the subsequent recovery of the meteorite may help make progress on this question. The main caveat of such an approach, however, is that the recovery rate of meteorite falls is low, implying that the meteoritic analogues of at least 80% of the observed falls remain unknown. Aims: Spectroscopic observations of bolides may have the potential to mitigate this problem by classifying the incoming material. Methods: To probe the use of spectroscopy to determine the meteoritic analogues of bolides, we collected emission spectra in the visible range (320-880nm) of five meteorite types (H,L,LL,CM,eucrite) acquired in atmospheric entry-like conditions in a plasma wind tunnel at the University of Stuttgart (Germany). A detailed spectral analysis including line identification and mass ratio determinations (Mg/Fe,Na/Fe) was subsequently performed on all spectra. Results: Spectroscopy, via a simple line identification, allows us to distinguish the main meteorite classes (chondrites, achondrites and irons) but does not have the potential to distinguish for example an H from a CM chondrite. Conclusions: The source location within the main belt of the different meteorite classes (H, L, LL, CM, etc.) should continue to be investigated via fireball observation networks. Spectroscopy of incoming bolides only marginally helps precisely classify the incoming material (iron meteorites only). To reach a statistically significant sample of recovered meteorites along with accurate orbits (>100) within a reasonable time frame (10-20 years), the optimal solution may be the spatial extension of existing fireball observation networks.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1605.07579  [pdf] - 1429534
Martian zeolites as a source of atmospheric methane
Comments: Accepted for publication in Icarus
Submitted: 2016-05-24
The origin of the martian methane is still poorly understood. A plausible explanation is that methane could have been produced either by hydrothermal alteration of basaltic crust or by serpentinization of ultramafic rocks producing hydrogen and reducing crustal carbon into methane. Once formed, methane storage on Mars is commonly associated with the presence of hidden clathrate reservoirs. Here, we alternatively suggest that chabazite and clinoptilolite, which belong to the family of zeolites, may form a plausible storage reservoir of methane in the martian subsurface. Because of the existence of many volcanic terrains, zeolites are expected to be widespread on Mars and their Global Equivalent Layer may range up to more than $\sim$1 km, according to the most optimistic estimates. If the martian methane present in chabazite and clinoptilolite is directly sourced from an abiotic source in the subsurface, the destabilization of a localized layer of a few millimeters per year may be sufficient to explain the current observations. The sporadic release of methane from these zeolites requires that they also remained isolated from the atmosphere during its evolution. The methane release over the ages could be due to several mechanisms such as impacts, seismic activity or erosion. If the methane outgassing from excavated chabazite and/or clinoptilolite prevails on Mars, then the presence of these zeolites around Gale Crater could explain the variation of methane level observed by Mars Science Laboratory.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422  [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.; Ďurech, J.; Oszkiewicz, D. A.; Behrend, R.; Carry, B.; Delbo', M.; Adam, O.; Afonina, V.; Anquetin, R.; Antonini, P.; Arnold, L.; Audejean, M.; Aurard, P.; Bachschmidt, M.; Badue, B.; Barbotin, E.; Barroy, P.; Baudouin, P.; Berard, L.; Berger, N.; Bernasconi, L.; Bosch, J-G.; Bouley, S.; Bozhinova, I.; Brinsfield, J.; Brunetto, L.; Canaud, G.; Caron, J.; Carrier, F.; Casalnuovo, G.; Casulli, S.; Cerda, M.; Chalamet, L.; Charbonnel, S.; Chinaglia, B.; Cikota, A.; Colas, F.; Coliac, J-F.; Collet, A.; Coloma, J.; Conjat, M.; Conseil, E.; Costa, R.; Crippa, R.; Cristofanelli, M.; Damerdji, Y.; Debackere, A.; Decock, A.; Déhais, Q.; Déléage, T.; Delmelle, S.; Demeautis, C.; Dróżdż, M.; Dubos, G.; Dulcamara, T.; Dumont, M.; Durkee, R.; Dymock, R.; del Valle, A. Escalante; Esseiva, N.; Esseiva, R.; Esteban, M.; Fauchez, T.; Fauerbach, M.; Fauvaud, M.; Fauvaud, S.; Forné, E.; Fournel, C.; Fradet, D.; Garlitz, J.; Gerteis, O.; Gillier, C.; Gillon, M.; Giraud, R.; Godard, J-P.; Goncalves, R.; Hamanowa, H.; Hamanowa, H.; Hay, K.; Hellmich, S.; Heterier, S.; Higgins, D.; Hirsch, R.; Hodosan, G.; Hren, M.; Hygate, A.; Innocent, N.; Jacquinot, H.; Jawahar, S.; Jehin, E.; Jerosimic, L.; Klotz, A.; Koff, W.; Korlevic, P.; Kosturkiewicz, E.; Krafft, P.; Krugly, Y.; Kugel, F.; Labrevoir, O.; Lecacheux, J.; Lehký, M.; Leroy, A.; Lesquerbault, B.; Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.; Lutz, M.; Mallecot, B.; Manfroid, J.; Manzini, F.; Marciniak, A.; Martin, A.; Modave, B.; Montaigut, R.; Montier, J.; Morelle, E.; Morton, B.; Mottola, S.; Naves, R.; Nomen, J.; Oey, J.; Ogłoza, W.; Paiella, M.; Pallares, H.; Peyrot, A.; Pilcher, F.; Pirenne, J-F.; Piron, P.; Polinska, M.; Polotto, M.; Poncy, R.; Previt, J. P.; Reignier, F.; Renauld, D.; Ricci, D.; Richard, F.; Rinner, C.; Risoldi, V.; Robilliard, D.; Romeuf, D.; Rousseau, G.; Roy, R.; Ruthroff, J.; Salom, P. A.; Salvador, L.; Sanchez, S.; Santana-Ros, T.; Scholz, A.; Séné, G.; Skiff, B.; Sobkowiak, K.; Sogorb, P.; Soldán, F.; Spiridakis, A.; Splanska, E.; Sposetti, S.; Starkey, D.; Stephens, R.; Stiepen, A.; Stoss, R.; Strajnic, J.; Teng, J-P.; Tumolo, G.; Vagnozzi, A.; Vanoutryve, B.; Vugnon, J. M.; Warner, B. D.; Waucomont, M.; Wertz, O.; Winiarski, M.; Wolf, M.
Comments: Accepted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e., classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive 3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies, which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission. This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth asteroids.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.3647  [pdf] - 1166676
Instrumental Methods for Professional and Amateur Collaborations in Planetary Astronomy
Comments: 123 pages, Accepted for publication in Experimental Astronomy
Submitted: 2013-05-15, last modified: 2014-03-04
Amateur contributions to professional publications have increased exponentially over the last decades in the field of Planetary Astronomy. Here we review the different domains of the field in which collaborations between professional and amateur astronomers are effective and regularly lead to scientific publications. We discuss the instruments, detectors, softwares and methodologies typically used by amateur astronomers to collect the scientific data in the different domains of interest. Amateur contributions to the monitoring of planets and interplanetary matter, characterization of asteroids and comets, as well as the determination of the physical properties of Kuiper Belt Objects and exoplanets are discussed.