Normalized to: Bolton, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.00072 [pdf] - 2095078
Jupiter's Equatorial Plumes and Hot Spots: Spectral Mapping from
Gemini/TEXES and Juno/MWR
Fletcher, L. N.;
Orton, G. S.;
Greathouse, T. K.;
Rogers, J. H.;
Zhang, Z.;
Oyafuso, F. A.;
Eichstädt, G.;
Melin, H.;
Li, C.;
Levin, S. M.;
Bolton, S.;
Janssen, M.;
Mettig, H-J.;
Grassi, D.;
Mura, A.;
Adriani, A.
Submitted: 2020-03-31, last modified: 2020-05-14
We present multi-wavelength measurements of the thermal, chemical, and cloud
contrasts associated with the visibly dark formations (also known as 5-$\mu$m
hot spots) and intervening bright plumes on the boundary between Jupiter's
Equatorial Zone (EZ) and North Equatorial Belt (NEB). Observations made by the
TEXES 5-20 $\mu$m spectrometer at the Gemini North Telescope in March 2017
reveal the upper-tropospheric properties of 12 hot spots, which are directly
compared to measurements by Juno using the Microwave Radiometer (MWR), JIRAM at
5 $\mu$m, and JunoCam visible images. MWR and thermal-infrared spectroscopic
results are consistent near 0.7 bar. Mid-infrared-derived aerosol opacity is
consistent with that inferred from visible-albedo and 5-$\mu$m opacity maps.
Aerosol contrasts, the defining characteristics of the cloudy plumes and
aerosol-depleted hot spots, are not a good proxy for microwave brightness. The
hot spots are neither uniformly warmer nor ammonia-depleted compared to their
surroundings at $p<1$ bar. At 0.7 bar, the microwave brightness at the edges of
hot spots is comparable to other features within the NEB. Conversely, hot spots
are brighter at 1.5 bar, signifying either warm temperatures and/or depleted
NH$_3$ at depth. Temperatures and ammonia are spatially variable within the hot
spots, so the precise location of the observations matters to their
interpretation. Reflective plumes sometimes have enhanced NH$_3$, cold
temperatures, and elevated aerosol opacity, but each plume appears different.
Neither plumes nor hot spots had microwave signatures in channels sensing
$p>10$ bars, suggesting that the hot-spot/plume wave is a relatively shallow
feature.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.09613 [pdf] - 2129169
Comparison of the deep atmospheric dynamics of Jupiter and Saturn in
light of the Juno and Cassini gravity measurements
Submitted: 2019-08-26
The nature and structure of the observed east-west flows on Jupiter and
Saturn has been one of the longest-lasting mysteries in planetary science. This
mystery has been recently unraveled due to the accurate gravity measurements
provided by the Juno mission to Jupiter and the Grand Finale of the Cassini
mission to Saturn. These two experiments, which coincidentally happened around
the same time, allowed determination of the vertical and meridional profiles of
the zonal flows on both planets. This paper reviews the topic of zonal jets on
the gas giants in light of the new data from these two experiments. The gravity
measurements not only allow the depth of the jets to be constrained, yielding
the inference that the jets extend roughly 3000 and 9000 km below the observed
clouds on Jupiter and Saturn, respectively, but also provide insights into the
mechanisms controlling these zonal flows. Specifically, for both planets this
depth corresponds to the depth where electrical conductivity is within an order
of magnitude of 1 S/m, implying that the magnetic field likely plays a key role
in damping the zonal flows.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.09956 [pdf] - 1864079
Determining the depth of Jupiter's Great Red Spot with Juno: a Slepian
approach
Submitted: 2019-03-24
One of Jupiter's most prominent atmospheric features, the Great Red Spot
(GRS), has been observed for more than two centuries, yet little is known about
its structure and dynamics below its observed cloud-level. While its
anticyclonic vortex appearance suggests it might be a shallow weather-layer
feature, the very long time span for which it was observed implies it is likely
deeply rooted, otherwise it would have been sheared apart by Jupiter's
turbulent atmosphere. Determining the GRS depth will shed light not only on the
processes governing the GRS, but on the dynamics of Jupiter's atmosphere as a
whole. The Juno mission single flyby over the GRS (PJ7) discovered using
microwave radiometer measurements that the GRS is at least a couple hundred
kilometers deep (Li et al. 2017). The next flybys over the GRS (PJ18 and PJ21),
will allow high-precision gravity measurements that can be used to estimate how
deep the GRS winds penetrate below the cloud-level. Here we propose a novel
method to determine the depth of the GRS based on the new gravity measurements
and a Slepian function approach that enables an effective representation of the
wind-induced spatially-confined gravity signal, and an efficient determination
of the GRS depth given the limited measurements. We show that with this method
the gravity signal of the GRS should be detectable for wind depths deeper than
300 kilometers, with reasonable uncertainties that depend on depth (e.g.,
$\pm$100km for a GRS depth of 1000km).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01997 [pdf] - 1585624
Comparing Jupiter interior structure models to Juno gravity measurements
and the role of a dilute core
Wahl, S. M.;
Hubbard, W. B.;
Militzer, B.;
Guillot, T.;
Miguel, Y.;
Movshovitz, N.;
Kaspi, Y.;
Helled, R.;
Reese, D.;
Galanti, E.;
Levin, S.;
Connerney, J. E.;
Bolton, S. J.
Submitted: 2017-07-06
The Juno spacecraft has measured Jupiter's low-order, even gravitational
moments, $J_2$--$J_8$, to an unprecedented precision, providing important
constraints on the density profile and core mass of the planet. Here we report
on a selection of interior models based on ab initio computer simulations of
hydrogen-helium mixtures. We demonstrate that a dilute core, expanded to a
significant fraction of the planet's radius, is helpful in reconciling the
calculated $J_n$ with Juno's observations. Although model predictions are
strongly affected by the chosen equation of state, the prediction of an
enrichment of $Z$ in the deep, metallic envelope over that in the shallow,
molecular envelope holds. We estimate Jupiter's core to contain an 7--25 Earth
mass of heavy elements. We discuss the current difficulties in reconciling
measured $J_n$ with the equations of state, and with theory for formation and
evolution of the planet.