Machine learning lies at the heart of new possibilities for scientific discovery, knowledge generation, and artificial intelligence. Its potential benefits to these fields requires going beyond predictive accuracy and focusing on interpretability. In particular, many scientific problems require interpretations in a domain-specific interpretable feature space (e.g. the frequency domain) whereas attributions to the raw features (e.g. the pixel space) may be unintelligible or even misleading. To address this challenge, we propose TRIM (TRansformation IMportance), a novel approach which attributes importances to features in a transformed space and can be applied post-hoc to a fully trained model. TRIM is motivated by a cosmological parameter estimation problem using deep neural networks (DNNs) on simulated data, but it is generally applicable across domains/models and can be combined with any local interpretation method. In our cosmology example, combining TRIM with contextual decomposition shows promising results for identifying which frequencies a DNN uses, helping cosmologists to understand and validate that the model learns appropriate physical features rather than simulation artifacts.

The calibration of a measurement device is crucial for every scientific experiment, where a signal has to be inferred from data. We present CURE, the calibration uncertainty renormalized estimator, to reconstruct a signal and simultaneously the instrument's calibration from the same data without knowing the exact calibration, but its covariance structure. The idea of CURE, developed in the framework of information field theory, is starting with an assumed calibration to successively include more and more portions of calibration uncertainty into the signal inference equations and to absorb the resulting corrections into renormalized signal (and calibration) solutions. Thereby, the signal inference and calibration problem turns into solving a single system of ordinary differential equations and can be identified with common resummation techniques used in field theories. We verify CURE by applying it to a simplistic toy example and compare it against existent self-calibration schemes, Wiener filter solutions, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. We conclude that the method is able to keep up in accuracy with the best self-calibration methods and serves as a non-iterative alternative to it.