sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Boehm, Celine

Normalized to: Boehm, C.

65 article(s) in total. 2218 co-authors, from 1 to 19 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2001.09999  [pdf] - 2076857
The BUFFALO HST Survey
Steinhardt, Charles L.; Jauzac, Mathilde; Acebron, Ana; Atek, Hakim; Capak, Peter; Davidzon, Iary; Eckert, Dominique; Harvey, David; Koekemoer, Anton M.; Lagos, Claudia D. P.; Mahler, Guillaume; Montes, Mireia; Niemiec, Anna; Nonino, Mario; Oesch, P. A.; Richard, Johan; Rodney, Steven A.; Schaller, Matthieu; Sharon, Keren; Strolger, Louis-Gregory; Allingham, Joseph; Amara, Adam; Bah'e, Yannick; Boehm, Celine; Bose, Sownak; Bouwens, Rychard J.; Bradley, Larry D.; Brammer, Gabriel; Broadhurst, Tom; Canas, Rodrigo; Cen, Renyue; Clement, Benjamin; Clowe, Douglas; Coe, Dan; Connor, Thomas; Darvish, Behnam; Diego, Jose M.; Ebeling, Harald; Edge, A. C.; Egami, Eiichi; Ettori, Stefano; Faisst, Andreas L.; Frye, Brenda; Furtak, Lukas J.; Gomez-Guijarro, C.; Gonzalez, J. D. Remolina; Gonzalez, Anthony; Graur, Or; Gruen, Daniel; Harvey, David; Hensley, Hagan; Hovis-Afflerbach, Beryl; Jablonka, Pascale; Jha, Saurabh W.; Jullo, Eric; Kneib, Jean-Paul; Kokorev, Vasily; Lagattuta, David J.; Limousin, Marceau; von der Linden, Anja; Linzer, Nora B.; Lopez, Adrian; Magdis, Georgios E.; Massey, Richard; Masters, Daniel C.; Maturi, Matteo; McCully, Curtis; McGee, Sean L.; Meneghetti, Massimo; Mobasher, Bahram; Moustakas, Leonidas A.; Murphy, Eric J.; Natarajan, Priyamvada; Neyrinck, Mark; O'Connor, Kyle; Oguri, Masamune; Pagul, Amanda; Rhodes, Jason; Rich, R. Michael; Robertson, Andrew; Sereno, Mauro; Shan, Huanyuan; Smith, Graham P.; Sneppen, Albert; Squires, Gordon K.; Tam, Sut-Ieng; Tchernin, Celine; Toft, Sune; Umetsu, Keiichi; Weaver, John R.; van Weeren, R. J.; Williams, Liliya L. R.; Wilson, Tom J.; Yan, Lin; Zitrin, Adi
Comments: Accepted ApJS; MAST archive will be live concurrent with publication
Submitted: 2020-01-27, last modified: 2020-02-13
The Beyond Ultra-deep Frontier Fields and Legacy Observations (BUFFALO) is a 101 orbit + 101 parallel Cycle 25 Hubble Space Telescope Treasury program taking data from 2018-2020. BUFFALO will expand existing coverage of the Hubble Frontier Fields (HFF) in WFC3/IR F105W, F125W, and F160W and ACS/WFC F606W and F814W around each of the six HFF clusters and flanking fields. This additional area has not been observed by HST but is already covered by deep multi-wavelength datasets, including Spitzer and Chandra. As with the original HFF program, BUFFALO is designed to take advantage of gravitational lensing from massive clusters to simultaneously find high-redshift galaxies which would otherwise lie below HST detection limits and model foreground clusters to study properties of dark matter and galaxy assembly. The expanded area will provide a first opportunity to study both cosmic variance at high redshift and galaxy assembly in the outskirts of the large HFF clusters. Five additional orbits are reserved for transient followup. BUFFALO data including mosaics, value-added catalogs and cluster mass distribution models will be released via MAST on a regular basis, as the observations and analysis are completed for the six individual clusters.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.11074  [pdf] - 2022484
Polarisation of high energy gamma-rays after scattering
Comments: 34 pages, 8 figures, 6 appendices, typos corrected, explanations and references added, matches JCAP published version
Submitted: 2019-03-26, last modified: 2020-01-06
The polarisation of sunlight after scattering off the atmosphere was first described by Chandrasekhar using a geometrical description of Rayleigh interactions. Kosowsky later extended Chandrasekhar's formalism by using Quantum Field Theory (QFT) to describe the polarisation of the Cosmological Microwave Background radiation. Here we focus on a case that is rarely discussed in the literature, namely the polarisation of high energy radiation after scattering off particles. After demonstrating why the geometrical and low energy QFT approaches fail in this case, we establish the transport formalism that allows to describe the change of polarisation of high energy photons when they propagate through space or the atmosphere. We primarily focus on Compton interactions but our approach is general enough to describe e.g. the scattering of high energy photons off new particles or through new interactions. Finally we determine the conditions for a circularly polarised $\gamma$--ray signal to keep the same level of circular polarisation as it propagates through its environment.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.08977  [pdf] - 2017793
Gaia GraL: Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems. V. Doubly-imaged QSOs discovered from entropy and wavelets
Comments: 8 pages including Appendix, 3 figures, 1 table. To be submitted to A&A - Comments are very welcome
Submitted: 2019-12-18
The discovery of multiply-imaged gravitationally lensed QSOs is fundamental to many astronomical and cosmological studies. However, these objects are rare and challenging to discover due to requirements of high-angular resolution astrometric, multiwavelength photometric and spectroscopic data. This has limited the number of known systems to a few hundred objects. We aim to reduce the constraints on angular resolution and discover multiply-imaged QSO candidates by using new candidate selection principles based on unresolved photometric time-series and ground-based images from public surveys. We selected candidates for multiply-imaged QSOs based on low levels of entropy computed from Catalina unresolved photometric time-series or Euclidean similarity to known lenses in a space defined by the wavelet power spectra of Pan-STARSS DR2 or DECaLS DR7 images, combined with multiple {\it Gaia} DR2 sources or large astrometric errors and supervised and unsupervised learning methods. We then confirmed spectroscopically some candidates with the Palomar Hale, Keck-I, and ESO/NTT telescopes. Here we report the discovery and confirmation of seven doubly-imaged QSOs and one likely double quasar. This demonstrates the potential of combining space-astrometry, even if unresolved, with low spatial-resolution photometric time-series and/or low-spatial resolution multi-band imaging to discover multiply-imaged lensed QSOs.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.08028  [pdf] - 1981876
ESA Voyage 2050 white paper -- Faint objects in motion: the new frontier of high precision astrometry
Comments: White paper for the Voyage 2050 long-term plan in the ESA Science Programme. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1707.01348
Submitted: 2019-10-12
Sky survey telescopes and powerful targeted telescopes play complementary roles in astronomy. In order to investigate the nature and characteristics of the motions of very faint objects, a flexibly-pointed instrument capable of high astrometric accuracy is an ideal complement to current astrometric surveys and a unique tool for precision astrophysics. Such a space-based mission will push the frontier of precision astrometry from evidence of earth-massed habitable worlds around the nearest starts, and also into distant Milky way objects up to the Local Group of galaxies. As we enter the era of the James Webb Space Telescope and the new ground-based, adaptive-optics-enabled giant telescopes, by obtaining these high precision measurements on key objects that Gaia could not reach, a mission that focuses on high precision astrometry science can consolidate our theoretical understanding of the local universe, enable extrapolation of physical processes to remote redshifts, and derive a much more consistent picture of cosmological evolution and the likely fate of our cosmos. Already several missions have been proposed to address the science case of faint objects in motion using high precision astrometry ESA missions: NEAT for M3, micro-NEAT for S1 mission, and Theia for M4 and M5. Additional new mission configurations adapted with technological innovations could be envisioned to pursue accurate measurements of these extremely small motions. The goal of this white paper is to address the fundamental science questions that are at stake when we focus on the motions of faint sky objects and to briefly review quickly instrumentation and mission profiles.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.01773  [pdf] - 1983940
Reply to a comment on `Understanding the gamma-ray emission from the globular cluster 47 Tuc: evidence for dark matter?'
Comments: 3 pages, accepted for publication in PRD
Submitted: 2019-09-04
Analysing 9 years of Fermi-LAT observations, we recently studied the spectral properties of the prominent globular cluster 47 Tuc (Brown et al. 2018). In particular, we investigated several models to explain the observed gamma-ray emission, ranging from millisecond pulsars (MSP) to Dark Matter (DM), with the motivation for the latter model driven by recent evidence that 47 Tuc harbours an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH). This investigation found evidence that the observed gamma-ray emission from 47 Tuc is due to two source populations of MSPs and DM. In Bartels \& Edwards (2018), the authors comment that this evidence is an artifact of the MSP spectra used in (Brown et al. 2019). Here we reply to this comment and argue that the authors of Bartels \& Edwards (2018) (i) do not give due consideration to a very important implication of their result and (ii) there is tension between our MSP fit and their MSP fit when taking uncertainties into consideration. As such, we still conclude there is evidence for a DM component which motivates a deeper radio study of the prominent globular cluster 47 Tuc.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1809.06385  [pdf] - 1947577
How high is the neutrino floor?
Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures. Author added
Submitted: 2018-09-17, last modified: 2019-08-21
In this paper, we compute the contribution to the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section from new physics models in the neutrino sector. We use this information to calculate the maximum value of the so-called neutrino floor for direct dark matter detection experiments, which determines when these detectors are sensitive to the neutrino background. After including all relevant experimental constraints in different simplified neutrino models, we have found that the neutrino floor can increase by various orders of magnitude in the region of dark matter masses below 10 GeV in the case of scalar mediators, however, this spectacular enhancement is subject to the re-examination of supernovae bounds. The increase is approximately a factor of two for vector mediators. In the light of these results, future claims by direct detection experiments exploring the low-mass window must be carefully examined if a signal is found well above the expected Standard Model neutrino floor.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.08836  [pdf] - 1869907
All-Sky Near Infrared Space Astrometry
Comments: 7 pages
Submitted: 2019-04-18
Gaia is currently revolutionizing modern astronomy. However, much of the Galactic plane, center and the spiral arm regions are obscured by interstellar extinction, rendering them inaccessible because Gaia is an optical instrument. An all-sky near infrared (NIR) space observatory operating in the optical NIR, separated in time from the original Gaia would provide microarcsecond NIR astrometry and millimag photometry to penetrate obscured regions unraveling the internal dynamics of the Galaxy.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.05140  [pdf] - 1848633
Cosmological Probes of Dark Matter Interactions: The Next Decade
Comments: Astro2020 Decadal Survey science white paper; list of endorsers available at https://github.com/veragluscevic/Astro2020-DM-Cosmology-Endorsers
Submitted: 2019-03-12
Cosmological observations offer unique and robust avenues for probing the fundamental nature of dark matter particles-they broadly test a range of compelling theoretical scenarios, often surpassing or complementing the reach of terrestrial and other experiments. We discuss observational and theoretical advancements that will play a pivotal role in realizing a strong program of cosmological searches for the identity of dark matter in the coming decade. Specifically, we focus on measurements of the cosmic-microwave-background anisotropy and spectral distortions, and tracers of structure (such as the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest, galaxies, and the cosmological 21-cm signal).
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.02624  [pdf] - 1924925
Gaia GraL: Gaia DR2 Gravitational Lens Systems. IV. Keck/LRIS spectroscopic confirmation of GRAL113100-441959 and model prediction of time-delays
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-10-05
We report the spectroscopic confirmation and modeling of the quadruply imaged quasar GRAL113100-441959, the first gravitational lens (GL) to be discovered mainly from astrometric considerations. Follow-up spectra obtained with Keck/LRIS reveal the lensing nature of this quadruply-imaged quasar with redshift $z_s = 1.090 \pm 0.002$, but show no evidence of the central lens galaxy. Using the image positions and $G$-band flux ratios provided by Gaia Data Release 2 as constraints, we model the system with a singular power-law elliptical mass distribution (SPEMD) plus external shear, to different levels of complexity. We show that relaxing the isothermal constraint of the SPEMD is not statistically significant, and thus we simplify the SPEMD to a singular isothermal ellipsoid to estimate the Einstein radius of the main lens galaxy $\theta_{\text{E}} = 0.\!\!^{\prime\prime}851$, the intensity and position angle of the external shear $(\gamma,\theta_{\gamma}) = (0.044,11.\!\!^{\circ}5)$, and we predict the lensing galaxy position to be $(x_{\text{gal}},y_{\text{gal}}) = (-0.\!\!^{\prime\prime}424,-0.\!\!^{\prime\prime}744)$ with respect to image A. We provide time delay predictions for pairs of images, assuming a plausible range of lens redshift values $z_l$ between $0.5$ and $0.9$. We finally examine the impact on time delays of the so-called Source Position Transformation, a family of degeneracies existing between different lens density profiles that reproduce most of the lensing observables equally well. We show that this effect contributes significantly to the time delay error budget and cannot be ignored during the modeling. This has implications for robust cosmography applications of lensed systems. GRAL113100-441959 is the first in a series of seven new spectroscopically confirmed GLs discovered from Gaia Data Release 2.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1803.03732  [pdf] - 1647657
Precision Space Astrometry as a Tool to Find Earth-like Exoplanets
Comments: A White Paper to the National Academy of Sciences Committee on an Exoplanet Science Strategy Call for Papers. 6 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2018-03-09
Because of the recent technological advances, the key technologies needed for precision space optical astrometry are now in hand. The Microarcsecond Astrometry Probe (MAP) mission concept is designed to find 1 Earth mass planets at 1AU orbit (scaled to solar luminosity) around the nearest ~90 FGK stars. The MAP payload includes i) a single three-mirror anastigmatic telescope with a 1-m primary mirror and metrology subsystems, and ii) a camera. The camera focal plane consists of 42 detectors, providing a Nyquist sampled FOV of 0.4-deg. Its metrology subsystems ensure that MAP can achieve the 0.8 uas astrometric precision in 1 hr, which is required to detect Earth-like exoplanets in our stellar neighborhood. MAP mission could provide ~10 specific targets for a much larger coronagraphic mission that would measure its spectra. We argue for the development of the space astrometric missions capable of finding Earth-2.0. Given the current technology readiness such missions relying on precision astrometry could be flown in the next decade, perhaps in collaboration with other national space agencies.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.01961  [pdf] - 1626227
Unique probe of dark matter in the core of M87 with the Event Horizon Telescope
Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures; matches version published in PRD
Submitted: 2016-11-07, last modified: 2018-01-30
We demonstrate the unprecedented capabilities of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) to image the innermost dark matter profile in the vicinity of the supermassive black hole at the center of the M87 radio galaxy. We present the first model of the synchrotron emission induced by dark matter annihilations from a spiky profile in the close vicinity of a supermassive black hole, accounting for strong gravitational lensing effects. Our results show that the EHT should readily resolve dark matter spikes if present. Moreover, the photon ring surrounding the silhouette of the black hole is clearly visible in the spike emission, which introduces observable small-scale structure into the signal. We find that the dark matter-induced emission provides an adequate fit to the existing EHT data, implying that in addition to the jet, a dark matter spike may account for a sizable portion of the millimeter emission from the innermost (subparsec) region of M87. Regardless, our results show that the EHT can probe very weakly annihilating dark matter. Current EHT observations already constrain very small cross sections, typically down to a few 10^{-31} cm^{3} s^{-1} for a 10 GeV candidate, close to characteristic values for p-wave-suppressed annihilation. Future EHT observations will further improve constraints on the DM scenario.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.06735  [pdf] - 1595695
Exploring dark matter microphysics with galaxy surveys
Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures, 4 tables. v2: refined DESI forecast technique, added contour plot for p-wave constraints and forecast. v3: corrected typo in H0 values in Tables II and III for the s-wave interaction
Submitted: 2015-05-25, last modified: 2017-11-30
We use present cosmological observations and forecasts of future experiments to illustrate the power of large-scale structure (LSS) surveys in probing dark matter (DM) microphysics and unveiling potential deviations from the standard $\Lambda$CDM scenario. To quantify this statement, we focus on an extension of $\Lambda$CDM with DM-neutrino scattering, which leaves a distinctive imprint on the angular and matter power spectra. After finding that future CMB experiments (such as COrE+) will not significantly improve the constraints set by the Planck satellite, we show that the next generation of galaxy clustering surveys (such as DESI) could play a leading role in constraining alternative cosmologies and even have the potential to make a discovery. Typically we find that DESI would be an order of magnitude more sensitive to DM interactions than Planck, thus probing effects that until now have only been accessible via $N$-body simulations.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.03483  [pdf] - 1588207
Cherenkov Telescope Array Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017)
Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Portella, V. Acín; Adams, C.; Agudo, I.; Aharonian, F.; Samarai, I. Al; Alberdi, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Aloisio, R.; Batista, R. Alves; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asano, A.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Ballo, L.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barai, P.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Bednarek, W.; Belfiore, A.; Benbow, W.; Benito, M.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernardos, M.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Salucci, C. Bertinelli; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bettane, J.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bird, R.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Boccato, C.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Bozhilov, V.; Braiding, C.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brill, A.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Brown, A. M.; Brown, S.; Brügge, K.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brun, F.; Brunetti, L.; Brunetti, G.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Caccianiga, A.; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capitanio, F.; Caproni, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Caraveo, P.; Cárdenas, V.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carlile, C.; Caroff, S.; Carosi, R.; Carosi, A.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Cauz, D.; Silva, C. Celestino; Celli, S.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chakraborty, N.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chikawa, M.; Chitnis, V. R.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Clark, P.; Coco, V.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Cornat, R.; Cortina, J.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Cristofari, P.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Crovari, C.; Cuadra, J.; Cuevas, O.; Cui, X.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; D'Aì, A.; D'Ammando, F.; D'Avanzo, P.; D'Urso, D.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; De Angelis, A.; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; De Lucia, M.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Deiml, P.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Reznicek, M. Delfino; Delgado, C.; Mengual, J. Delgado; Della Ceca, R.; della Volpe, D.; Detournay, M.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Venere, L.; Diaz, L.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Domínguez, A.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durkalec, A.; Dwarkadas, V.; Ebr, J.; Eckner, C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Ekoume, T. R. N.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Evoli, C.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Farakos, K.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, J. P.; Finley, C.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Flores, H.; Foffano, L.; Föhr, C.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fornasa, M.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Fraga, B.; Franco, F. J.; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fruck, C.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Füßling, M.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Garcia, B.; Garcia, A.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, F.; Gargano, C.; Garozzo, S.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gasparetto, T.; Gaté, F.; Gaug, M.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Giammaria, P.; Gianotti, F.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gómez, J. L.; Gómez-Vargas, G.; González, M. M.; González, J. M.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Guarino, V.; Guest, B.; Gueta, O.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hahn, A.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayashi, K.; Hayashida, M.; He, H.; Heller, M.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hiroshima, N.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J. K.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holder, J.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Hull, G.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Hütten, M.; Iarlori, M.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Ingallinera, A.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Ionica, M.; Iori, M.; Iriarte, A.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Jankowsky, F.; Jankowsky, D.; Jansweijer, P.; Jarnot, C.; Jean, P.; Johnson, C. A.; Josselin, M.; Jung-Richardt, I.; Jurysek, J.; Kaaret, P.; Kachru, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kimura, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Komin, N.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kraus, M.; Krause, M.; Krauß, F.; Krennrich, F.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kumar, S.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; Kushwaha, P.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landoni, M.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Blanc, O. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Leach, S.; Leckngam, A.; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leto, G.; Lico, R.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Lipniacka, A.; Lloyd, S.; Lohse, T.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopez, M.; Lopez-Coto, R.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Maier, G.; Majczyna, A.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Malyshev, D.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marcowith, A.; Marín, J.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martin, L.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Melandri, A.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Mereghetti, S.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Micanovic, S.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mievre, I.; Miller, J.; Minaya, I. A.; Mineo, T.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mohammed, M.; Mohrmann, L.; Molijn, C.; Molinari, E.; Moncada, R.; Montaruli, T.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morcuende-Parrilla, D.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Murach, T.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Murphy, A.; Nagai, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Neise, D.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozaki, S.; Nunio, F.; O'Brien, P.; Oakes, L.; Ocampo, C.; Ochoa, J. P.; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Ong, R. A.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J. P.; Ostrowski, M.; Otte, N.; Ou, Z.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatiello, M.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papitto, A.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Parsons, R. D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pe'er, A.; Pech, M.; Pedaletti, G.; Del Campo, P. Peñil; Perez, A.; Pérez-Torres, M. A.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrera, S.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Piano, G.; Piel, Q.; Pieloth, D.; Pintore, F.; García, C. Pio; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Pizarro, L.; Platos, Ł.; Pohl, M.; Poireau, V.; Pollo, A.; Porthault, J.; Poutanen, J.; Pozo, D.; Prandini, E.; Prasit, P.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Queiroz, F.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Razzaque, S.; Reichardt, I.; Reimer, O.; Reimer, A.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A. H.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; del Mazo, J. E. Ruíz; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Russo, F.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Hatlen, E. Sæther; Safi-Harb, S.; Sahakian, V.; Sailer, S.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salina, G.; Sanchez, D.; Sánchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Saturni, F. G.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Schanne, S.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schulz, A.; Schussler, F.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Seglar-Arroyo, M.; Segreto, A.; Seitenzahl, I.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shah, K.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shilon, I.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Slowikowska, A.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sokolenko, A.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Springer, W.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stuik, R.; Suchenek, M.; Suomijarvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Tanci, C.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Thoudam, S.; Tian, W.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torresi, E.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Trakarnsirinont, N.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Tsirou, M.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; Berg, A. M. Van den; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Varner, G. S.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Veres, P.; Vergani, S.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Villanueva, J.; Vincent, P.; Vink, J.; Visconti, F.; Vittorini, V.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, S. J.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, P.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Ward, M.; Ward, J. E.; Warren, D.; Watson, J. J.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Weniger, C.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Winter, M.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yaguna, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zdziarski, A. A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhdanov, V. I.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.
Comments: Index of Cherenkov Telescope Array conference proceedings at the ICRC2017, Busan, Korea
Submitted: 2017-09-11, last modified: 2017-10-24
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium presented at the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference, July 12-20 2017, Busan, Korea.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.05560  [pdf] - 1790558
Future Astrometric Space Missions for Exoplanet Science
Comments: 12 pages, 3 figures. Invited review to appear in 'Handbook of Exoplanets', Springer Reference Works, edited by Hans J. Deeg and Juan Antonio Belmonte
Submitted: 2017-08-18
High-precision astrometry at the sub-microarcsecond level opens up a window to study Earth-like planets in the habitable zones of Sun-like stars, and to determine their masses. It thus promises to play an important role in exoplanet science in the future. However, such precision can only be acquired from space, and requires dedicated instrumentation for a sufficient astrometric calibration. Here we present a series of concepts designed for handling this task. STARE is a small satellite concept dedicated to finding planets in the very nearest stellar systems, which offers a low-cost option toward the study of habitable planets. The NEAT concept is a set of two formation-flying satellites with the aim to survey the 200 nearest Sun-like stars for Earths in the habitable zone. Finally, THEIA is a proposal for an ESA M-class mission, with a single-unit telescope designed for both dark matter studies as well as a survey for habitable Earth-like planets among the 50 nearest stars. The concepts illustrate various possible paths and strategies for achieving exquisite astrometric performance, and thereby addressing key scientific questions regarding the distribution of habitability and life in the universe.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.01348  [pdf] - 1585537
Theia: Faint objects in motion or the new astrometry frontier
The Theia Collaboration; Boehm, Celine; Krone-Martins, Alberto; Amorim, Antonio; Anglada-Escude, Guillem; Brandeker, Alexis; Courbin, Frederic; Ensslin, Torsten; Falcao, Antonio; Freese, Katherine; Holl, Berry; Labadie, Lucas; Leger, Alain; Malbet, Fabien; Mamon, Gary; McArthur, Barbara; Mora, Alcione; Shao, Michael; Sozzetti, Alessandro; Spolyar, Douglas; Villaver, Eva; Albertus, Conrado; Bertone, Stefano; Bouy, Herve; Boylan-Kolchin, Michael; Brown, Anthony; Brown, Warren; Cardoso, Vitor; Chemin, Laurent; Claudi, Riccardo; Correia, Alexandre C. M.; Crosta, Mariateresa; Crouzier, Antoine; Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan; Damasso, Mario; da Silva, Antonio; Davies, Melvyn; Das, Payel; Dayal, Pratika; de Val-Borro, Miguel; Diaferio, Antonaldo; Erickcek, Adrienne; Fairbairn, Malcolm; Fortin, Morgane; Fridlund, Malcolm; Garcia, Paulo; Gnedin, Oleg; Goobar, Ariel; Gordo, Paulo; Goullioud, Renaud; Hambly, Nigel; Hara, Nathan; Hobbs, David; Hog, Erik; Holland, Andrew; Ibata, Rodrigo; Jordi, Carme; Klioner, Sergei; Kopeikin, Sergei; Lacroix, Thomas; Laskar, Jacques; Poncin-Lafitte, Christophe Le; Luri, Xavier; Majumdar, Subhabrata; Makarov, Valeri; Massey, Richard; Mennesson, Bertrand; Michalik, Daniel; de Almeida, Andre Moitinho; Mourao, Ana; Moustakas, Leonidas; Murray, Neil; Muterspaugh, Matthew; Oertel, Micaela; Ostorero, Luisa; Perez-Garcia, Angeles; Platais, Imants; de Mora, Jordi Portell i; Quirrenbach, Andreas; Randall, Lisa; Read, Justin; Regos, Eniko; Rory, Barnes; Rybicki, Krzysztof; Scott, Pat; Schneider, Jean; Scholtz, Jakub; Siebert, Arnaud; Tereno, Ismael; Tomsick, John; Traub, Wesley; Valluri, Monica; Walker, Matt; Walton, Nicholas; Watkins, Laura; White, Glenn; Evans, Dafydd Wyn; Wyrzykowski, Lukasz; Wyse, Rosemary
Comments: http://theia.phyip3.dur.ac.uk
Submitted: 2017-07-02
In the context of the ESA M5 (medium mission) call we proposed a new satellite mission, Theia, based on relative astrometry and extreme precision to study the motion of very faint objects in the Universe. Theia is primarily designed to study the local dark matter properties, the existence of Earth-like exoplanets in our nearest star systems and the physics of compact objects. Furthermore, about 15 $\%$ of the mission time was dedicated to an open observatory for the wider community to propose complementary science cases. With its unique metrology system and "point and stare" strategy, Theia's precision would have reached the sub micro-arcsecond level. This is about 1000 times better than ESA/Gaia's accuracy for the brightest objects and represents a factor 10-30 improvement for the faintest stars (depending on the exact observational program). In the version submitted to ESA, we proposed an optical (350-1000nm) on-axis TMA telescope. Due to ESA Technology readiness level, the camera's focal plane would have been made of CCD detectors but we anticipated an upgrade with CMOS detectors. Photometric measurements would have been performed during slew time and stabilisation phases needed for reaching the required astrometric precision.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1701.02754  [pdf] - 1581127
Circular polarisation: a new probe of dark matter and neutrinos in the sky
Comments: 12 pages, published in JCAP
Submitted: 2017-01-10, last modified: 2017-05-28
The study of anomalous electromagnetic emission in the sky is the basis of indirect searches for dark matter. It is also a powerful tool to constrain the radiative decay of active neutrinos. Until now, quantitative analyses have focused on the flux and energy spectrum of such an emission; polarisation has never been considered. Here we show that we could be missing out on an essential piece of information. The radiative decay of neutrinos, as well as the interactions of dark matter and neutrinos with Standard Model particles can generate a circular polarisation signal in X-rays or \gamma-rays. If observed, this could reveal important information about their spatial distribution and particle-antiparticle ratio, and could even reveal the nature of the high-energy particle physics processes taking place in astrophysical sites. The question of the observability of these polarised signatures and their separation from background astrophysical sources is left for future work.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.05977  [pdf] - 1530543
Connecting the new H.E.S.S. diffuse emission at the Galactic center with the Fermi GeV excess: a combination of millisecond pulsars and heavy dark matter?
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures; matches version published in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2016-03-18, last modified: 2017-01-04
The H.E.S.S. collaboration has reported a high-energy spherically symmetric diffuse gamma-ray emission in the inner 50 pc of the Milky Way, up to ~ 50 TeV. Here we propose a leptonic model which provides an alternative to the hadronic scenario presented by the H.E.S.S. collaboration, and connects the newly reported TeV emission to the Fermi-LAT Galactic center GeV excess. Our model relies on a combination of inverse Compton emission from a population of millisecond pulsars---which can account for the GeV excess---and a supermassive black hole-induced spike of heavy (~ 60 TeV) dark matter particles annihilating into electrons with a sub-thermal cross-section. With an up-to-date interstellar radiation field, as well as a standard magnetic field and diffusion set-up, our model accounts for the spectral morphology of the detected emission. Moreover, we show that the dark matter induced emission reproduces the spatial morphology of the H.E.S.S. signal above ~ 10 TeV, while we obtain a slightly more extended component from pulsars at lower energies, which could be used as a prediction for future H.E.S.S. observations.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:1602.01114  [pdf] - 1525177
Ruling out the light WIMP explanation of the galactic 511 keV line
Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures. v3: Matches version in PRD
Submitted: 2016-02-02, last modified: 2016-11-29
Over the past few decades, an anomalous 511 keV gamma-ray line has been observed from the centre of the Milky Way. Dark matter (DM) in the form of light weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) annihilating into electron-positron pairs has been one of the leading hypotheses of the observed emission. Given the small required cross section, a further coupling to lighter particles is required to produce the correct relic density. Here, we derive constraints from the Planck satellite on light WIMPs that were in equilibrium with either the neutrino or electron sector in the early universe. For the neutrino sector, we obtain a lower bound on the WIMP mass of 4 MeV for a real scalar and 10 MeV for a Dirac fermion DM particle, at 95% CL. For the electron sector, we find even stronger bounds of 7 and 11 MeV, respectively. Using these results, we show that, in the absence of additional ingredients such as dark radiation, the light thermally produced WIMP explanation of the 511 keV excess is strongly disfavoured by the latest cosmological data. This suggests an unknown astrophysical or more exotic DM source of the signal.
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.05151  [pdf] - 1497663
Contributions of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) to the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, C.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, J.; Alfaro, R.; Allafort, A. J.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Arezki, B.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, R.; Bird, T.; Bissaldi, E.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Boix, J.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnarel, F.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Braiding, C.; Brantseg, T.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Bron, S.; Brook, P.; Brooks, W.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, F.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cadoux, F.; Tovar, J. Calvo; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cauz, D.; Cavazzani, S.; Cerchiara, P.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chaleil, T.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colley, J. -M.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Cornat, R.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cuadra, J.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; Delgado, J.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Diaz, M. A.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domínguez, A.; Dominik, N.; Dominique, J. -L.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Ducci, L.; Dumas, D.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Egorov, A.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsaesser, D.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Fornasa, M.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galindo, D.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Galvez, J. A.; Gao, S.; Garcia, A.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, L.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Gerard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghislain, P.; Giammaria, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Gieras, T.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Girardot, P.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gomez, G.; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; Gora, D.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Huetten, M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Incorvaia, S.; Infante, L.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, D.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Jones, M.; Josselin, M.; Journet, L.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kamon, H.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Kato, S.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Kossatz, M.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuklis, M.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lahmann, R.; Lakicevic, M.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luigi, T.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Magniette, F.; Magniez, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, L.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Martynyuk-Lototskyy, K.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Merk, M.; Mertsch, P.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mientjes, P.; Mievre, I.; Mihailidis, A.; Miller, J.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Molinari, E.; Molyneux, P.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Munari, M.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Nanni, J.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Ocampo, C.; Occhipinti, G.; Ochoa, J. P.; de Bhroithe, A. OFaolain; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Öttl, S.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Pe'er, A.; Peet, S.; Pelat, D.; Pepato, A.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pieloth, D.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Pollo, A.; Porcelli, A.; Porthault, J.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Ravel, T.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reichardt, I.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Prado, R. Ribeiro; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Roache, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Rubini, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Saemann, E. O.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saggion, A.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salamon, A.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salgado, J.; Salina, G.; Salinas, L.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmid, J.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schullian, E. -M.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Shigenaka, A.; Shilon, I.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Simpson, H.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Sliusar, V.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, R.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Suomijärvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Talbot, G.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tanigawa, S.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Taylor, A.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thornhill, J.; Thoudam, S.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Viaux, N.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; von Brand, H.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vu, L. V.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warren, D.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J. J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Wilson, N.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Winter, M.; Wischnewski, R.; Witt, E.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings for the Gamma 2016, Heidelberg, Germany
Submitted: 2016-10-17
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.08632  [pdf] - 1472452
Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report
Alexander, Jim; Battaglieri, Marco; Echenard, Bertrand; Essig, Rouven; Graham, Matthew; Izaguirre, Eder; Jaros, John; Krnjaic, Gordan; Mardon, Jeremy; Morrissey, David; Nelson, Tim; Perelstein, Maxim; Pyle, Matt; Ritz, Adam; Schuster, Philip; Shuve, Brian; Toro, Natalia; Van De Water, Richard G; Akerib, Daniel; An, Haipeng; Aniol, Konrad; Arnquist, Isaac J.; Asner, David M.; Back, Henning O.; Baker, Keith; Baltzell, Nathan; Banerjee, Dipanwita; Batell, Brian; Bauer, Daniel; Beacham, James; Benesch, Jay; Bjorken, James; Blinov, Nikita; Boehm, Celine; Bondí, Mariangela; Bonivento, Walter; Bossi, Fabio; Brodsky, Stanley J.; Budnik, Ran; Bueltmann, Stephen; Bukhari, Masroor H.; Bunker, Raymond; Carpinelli, Massimo; Cartaro, Concetta; Cassel, David; Cavoto, Gianluca; Celentano, Andrea; Chaterjee, Animesh; Chaudhuri, Saptarshi; Chiodini, Gabriele; Cho, Hsiao-Mei Sherry; Church, Eric D.; Cooke, D. A.; Cooley, Jodi; Cooper, Robert; Corliss, Ross; Crivelli, Paolo; Curciarello, Francesca; D'Angelo, Annalisa; Davoudiasl, Hooman; De Napoli, Marzio; De Vita, Raffaella; Denig, Achim; deNiverville, Patrick; Deshpande, Abhay; Dharmapalan, Ranjan; Dobrescu, Bogdan; Donskov, Sergey; Dupre, Raphael; Estrada, Juan; Fegan, Stuart; Ferber, Torben; Field, Clive; Figueroa-Feliciano, Enectali; Filippi, Alessandra; Fornal, Bartosz; Freyberger, Arne; Friedland, Alexander; Galon, Iftach; Gardner, Susan; Girod, Francois-Xavier; Gninenko, Sergei; Golutvin, Andrey; Gori, Stefania; Grab, Christoph; Graziani, Enrico; Griffioen, Keith; Haas, Andrew; Harigaya, Keisuke; Hearty, Christopher; Hertel, Scott; Hewett, JoAnne; Hime, Andrew; Hitlin, David; Hochberg, Yonit; Holt, Roy J.; Holtrop, Maurik; Hoppe, Eric W.; Hossbach, Todd W.; Hsu, Lauren; Ilten, Phil; Incandela, Joe; Inguglia, Gianluca; Irwin, Kent; Jaegle, Igal; Johnson, Robert P.; Kahn, Yonatan; Kalicy, Grzegorz; Kang, Zhong-Bo; Khachatryan, Vardan; Kozhuharov, Venelin; Krasnikov, N. V.; Kubarovsky, Valery; Kuflik, Eric; Kurinsky, Noah; Laha, Ranjan; Lanfranchi, Gaia; Li, Dale; Lin, Tongyan; Lisanti, Mariangela; Liu, Kun; Liu, Ming; Loer, Ben; Loomba, Dinesh; Lyubovitskij, Valery E.; Manalaysay, Aaron; Mandaglio, Giuseppe; Mans, Jeremiah; Marciano, W. J.; Markiewicz, Thomas; Marsicano, Luca; Maruyama, Takashi; Matveev, Victor A.; McKeen, David; McKinnon, Bryan; McKinsey, Dan; Merkel, Harald; Mock, Jeremy; Monzani, Maria Elena; Moreno, Omar; Nantais, Corina; Paul, Sebouh; Peskin, Michael; Poliakov, Vladimir; Polosa, Antonio D; Pospelov, Maxim; Rachek, Igor; Radics, Balint; Raggi, Mauro; Randazzo, Nunzio; Ratcliff, Blair; Rizzo, Alessandro; Rizzo, Thomas; Robinson, Alan; Rubbia, Andre; Rubin, David; Rueter, Dylan; Saab, Tarek; Santopinto, Elena; Schnee, Richard; Shelton, Jessie; Simi, Gabriele; Simonyan, Ani; Sipala, Valeria; Slone, Oren; Smith, Elton; Snowden-Ifft, Daniel; Solt, Matthew; Sorensen, Peter; Soreq, Yotam; Spagnolo, Stefania; Spencer, James; Stepanyan, Stepan; Strube, Jan; Sullivan, Michael; Tadepalli, Arun S.; Tait, Tim; Taiuti, Mauro; Tanedo, Philip; Tayloe, Rex; Thaler, Jesse; Tran, Nhan V.; Tulin, Sean; Tully, Christopher G.; Uemura, Sho; Ungaro, Maurizio; Valente, Paolo; Vance, Holly; Vavra, Jerry; Volansky, Tomer; von Krosigk, Belina; Whitbeck, Andrew; Williams, Mike; Wittich, Peter; Wojtsekhowski, Bogdan; Xue, Wei; Yoon, Jong Min; Yu, Hai-Bo; Yu, Jaehoon; Yu, Tien-Tien; Zhang, Yue; Zhao, Yue; Zhong, Yiming; Zurek, Kathryn
Comments: 66 pages, 15 figures, 3 tables. Workshop website and agenda: http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/darksectors2016/ https://indico.cern.ch/event/507783/ Editors: J. Alexander, M. Battaglieri, B. Echenard, R. Essig, M. Graham, E. Izaguirre, J. Jaros, G. Krnjaic, J. Mardon, D. Morrissey, T. Nelson, M. Perelstein, M. Pyle, A. Ritz, P. Schuster, B. Shuve, N. Toro, R. Van De Water
Submitted: 2016-08-30
This report, based on the Dark Sectors workshop at SLAC in April 2016, summarizes the scientific importance of searches for dark sector dark matter and forces at masses beneath the weak-scale, the status of this broad international field, the important milestones motivating future exploration, and promising experimental opportunities to reach these milestones over the next 5-10 years.
[21]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.00393  [pdf] - 1502033
Search for 511 keV Emission in Satellite Galaxies of the Milky Way with INTEGRAL/SPI
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, 1 table, accepted by A&A
Submitted: 2016-08-01
The positron annihilation gamma-ray signal in the Milky Way (MW) shows a puzzling morphology: a very bright bulge and a very low surface-brightness disk. A coherent explanation of the positron origin, propagation through the Galaxy and subsequent annihilation in the interstellar medium has not yet been found. Tentative explanations involve positrons from radioactivity, X-ray binaries, and dark matter (DM). Dwarf satellite galaxies (DSGs) are believed to be DM-dominated and hence promising candidates in the search for 511 keV emission as a result of DM annihilation into electron-positron pairs. The goal of this study is to constrain possible 511 keV gamma-ray signals from 39 DSGs of the MW and to test the annihilating DM scenario. We use the spectrometer SPI on INTEGRAL to extract individual spectra for the studied objects. As the diffuse galactic emission dominates the signal, the large scale morphology of the MW has been modelled accordingly and was included in a maximum likelihood analysis. Alternatively, a distance-weighted stacked spectrum has been determined. Only Reticulum II (Ret II) shows a 3.1 sigma signal. Five other sources show tentative 2 sigma signals. The mass-to-511-keV-luminosity-ratio shows a marginal trend towards higher values for intrinsically brighter objects, opposite to the V band mass-to-light-ratio, which is generally used to uncover DM in DSGs. All derived flux values are above the level implied by a DM interpretation of the MW bulge signal. The signal from Ret II is unlikely to be related to a DM origin alone, otherwise, the MW bulge would be about 100 times brighter than what is seen. Ret II is exceptional considering the DSG sample, and rather points to enhanced recent star formation activity, if its origins are similar to processes in the MW. Understanding this emission may provide further clues regarding the origin of the annihilation emission in the MW.
[22]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.01846  [pdf] - 1409951
The Spatial Morphology of the Secondary Emission in the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess
Comments: 12 pages, 3 figures. Fixed convergence problem in MSP case. Matches version accepted by PRD
Submitted: 2015-12-06, last modified: 2016-04-20
Excess GeV gamma rays from the Galactic Center (GC) have been measured with the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). The presence of the GC excess (GCE) appears to be robust with respect to changes in the diffuse galactic background modeling. The three main proposals for the GCE are an unresolved population of millisecond pulsars (MSPs), outbursts of cosmic rays from the GC region, and self-annihilating dark matter (DM). The injection of secondary electrons and positrons into the interstellar medium (ISM) by an unresolved population of MSPs or DM annihilations can lead to observable gamma-ray emission via inverse Compton scattering or bremsstrahlung. Here we investigate how to determine whether secondaries are important in a model for the GCE. We develop a method of testing model fit which accounts for the different spatial morphologies of the secondary emission. We examine several models which give secondary emission and illustrate a case where a broadband analysis is not sufficient to determine the need for secondary emission.
[23]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.06774  [pdf] - 1405978
Dark matter-radiation interactions: the structure of Milky Way satellite galaxies
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, 1 table. Augmented content available for figures (cf. 'Augmented Content' section). V3: Matches version in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-12-21, last modified: 2016-04-13
In the thermal dark matter (DM) paradigm, primordial interactions between DM and Standard Model particles are responsible for the observed DM relic density. In Boehm et al. (2014), we showed that weak-strength interactions between DM and radiation (photons or neutrinos) can erase small-scale density fluctuations, leading to a suppression of the matter power spectrum compared to the collisionless cold DM (CDM) model. This results in fewer DM subhaloes within Milky Way-like DM haloes, implying a reduction in the abundance of satellite galaxies. Here we use very high resolution N-body simulations to measure the dynamics of these subhaloes. We find that when interactions are included, the largest subhaloes are less concentrated than their counterparts in the collisionless CDM model and have rotation curves that match observational data, providing a new solution to the "too big to fail" problem.
[24]  oai:arXiv.org:1602.07282  [pdf] - 1475290
Isotropic extragalactic flux from dark matter annihilations: lessons from interacting dark matter scenarios
Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2016-02-23
The extragalactic gamma-ray and neutrino emission may have a contribution from dark matter (DM) annihilations. In the case of discrepancies between observations and standard predictions, one could infer the DM pair annihilation cross section into cosmic rays by studying the shape of the energy spectrum. So far all analyses of the extragalactic DM signal have assumed the standard cosmological model (LambdaCDM) as the underlying theory. However, there are alternative DM scenarios where the number of low-mass objects is significantly suppressed. Therefore the characteristics of the gamma-ray and neutrino emission in these models may differ from LambdaCDM as a result. Here we show that the extragalactic isotropic signal in these alternative models has a similar energy dependence to that in LambdaCDM, but the overall normalisation is reduced. The similarities between the energy spectra combined with the flux suppression could lead one to misinterpret possible evidence for models beyond LambdaCDM as being due to CDM particles annihilating with a much weaker cross section than expected.
[25]  oai:arXiv.org:1508.05894  [pdf] - 1275515
CTA Contributions to the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2015)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Actis, M.; Agnetta, G.; Aguilar, J. A.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Aliu, E.; Allafort, A. J.; Allan, D.; Allekotte, I.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arnaldi, H.; Arnold, L.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asorey, H. G.; Aune, T.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barceló, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Baushev, A.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Billotta, S.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, T.; Birsin, E.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Bigas, O. Blanch; Blasi, P.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Gargallo, J. Boix; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Bottani, A.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Braiding, C.; Brandt, L.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Bretz, T.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Brocato, E.; Brook, P.; Brown, A. M.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cameron, R.; Camprecios, J.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Cantu, S.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carmona, E.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Caruso, R.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cavazzani, S.; Cazaux, S.; Cefalà, M.; Cerchiara, P.; Cereda, M.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Champion, C.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Cheimets, P.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Cillis, A.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Compin, M.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De La Vega, G. A.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Depaola, G.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Sciascio, G.; Díaz, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Diez, V.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domainko, W.; Dominik, N.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Dumas, D.; Dumm, J.; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Echaniz, J. C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Errando, M.; Eschbach, S.; Etchegoyen, A.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falcone, A.; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Farrell, S.; Fasola, G.; Fegan, S.; Feinstein, F.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez, A.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Curcoll, R. Firpo; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Forest, F.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Frankowski, A.; Frega, N.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galante, N.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Gao, S.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, D.; Garrido, L.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Geffroy, N.; Gérard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghigo, M.; Ghislain, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Berisso, M. Gomez; Vargas, G. A. Gomez; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; González, F.; Muñoz, A. González; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Grandi, P.; Grañena, F.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hahn, J.; Hakansson, N.; Heras, N. Hamer; Hanabata, Y.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Harris, J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hoard, D.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Hofverberg, P.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J. R.; Hormigos, S.; Horns, D.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hütten, M.; Humensky, T. B.; Huovelin, J.; Huppert, J. -F.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Idźkowski, B.; Ikawa, D.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Incorvaia, S.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jeanney, C.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Journet, L.; Juffroy, C.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P. E.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kaufmann, S.; Kawanaka, N.; Kawashima, T.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kellner-Leidel, B.; Kendziorra, E.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kisaka, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kodakkadan, A.; Kodani, K.; Kohri, K.; Kojima, T.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Koul, R.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kushida, J.; Kuznetsov, A.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lagadec, T.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Languignon, D.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Latovski, N.; Law-Green, D.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Loiseau, D.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Longo, G.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; López-Coto, R.; López-Oramas, A.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Lu, C. -C.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Luz, O.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Maltezos, S.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Marszałek, A.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazureau, E.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCann, A.; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; McKay, R.; McKinney, K.; Meagher, K.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melo, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Mertsch, P.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michałowski, J.; Micolon, P.; Mientjes, P.; Mignot, S.; Mihailidis, A.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mistò, A.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Molinari, E.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Moore, P.; Olaizola, A. Moralejo; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mrusek, I.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar-Adrover, P.; Mundell, C.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neustroev, V.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Occhipinti, G.; de Bhroithe, A. O'Faolain; Ogino, M.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Otero, L. A.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Arribas, M. Paz; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Peet, S.; Pelassa, V.; Pelat, D.; Peres, C.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pichel, A.; Pieloth, D.; Pierbattista, M.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pita, S.; Planes, A.; Platino, M.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Ponz, J. D.; Porcelli, A.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Preece, R.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Proyetti, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Racero, E.; Räck, T.; Rafalski, J.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Rateau, S.; Ravel, T.; Ravignani, D.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reitberger, K.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Rettig, R.; Reville, B.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Ringegni, P.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivière, A.; Rivoire, S.; Roache, E.; Rodeghiero, G.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rogers, T.; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Rodriguez, M. P. Romay; Romeo, G.; Romero, G. E.; Roncadelli, M.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rossiter, P.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Różańska, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Saemann, E. O.; Saggion, A.; Saha, L.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, K.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Salgado, J.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez, F.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schafer, J.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schlickeiser, R.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schultz, C.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Pandeni, K. Shiningayamwe; Shukla, A.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Slyusar, V.; Smith, A.; Smith, J.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, D.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamatescu, V.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Straumann, U.; Strazzeri, E.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, H.; Talbot, G.; Tammi, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tarantino, E.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thomas, V.; Thornhill, J.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tibolla, O.; Tiengo, A.; Tijsseling, G.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toscano, S.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Townsley, C.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsubone, Y.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Underwood, C.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Vallania, P.; Vallejo, G.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Videla, M.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Vogler, P.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vu, L. V.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R. M.; Wagner, R. G.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warwick, R.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weinstein, A.; Weitzel, Q.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Werner, M.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Wischnewski, R.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yebras, J. M.; Yelos, D.; Yeung, W.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zabalza, V.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zurbach, C.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings at the ICRC2015, The Hague (The Netherlands). v1: placeholder with no arXiv links yet, to be replaced once individual contributions have been all submitted; v2: final with arXiv links to all CTA contributions and full author list
Submitted: 2015-08-24, last modified: 2015-09-11
List of contributions from the CTA Consortium presented at the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 30 July - 6 August 2015, The Hague, The Netherlands.
[26]  oai:arXiv.org:1505.00785  [pdf] - 1260336
Ruling out thermal dark matter with a black hole induced spiky profile in the M87 galaxy
Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures, matches published version
Submitted: 2015-05-04, last modified: 2015-08-09
Using the spectral energy distribution of M87, a nearby radio galaxy in the Virgo cluster, and assuming a supermassive black hole induced spike in the dark matter halo profile, we exclude any dark matter candidate with a velocity-independent (s-wave) annihilation cross-section of the order of sigma v ~ 10^{-26} cm^3/s and a mass up to O(100) TeV. These limits supersede all previous constraints on thermal, s-wave, annihilating dark matter candidates by orders of magnitude, and rule out the entire canonical mass range. We remark in addition that, under the assumption of a spike, dark matter particles with a mass of a few TeV and an annihilation cross-section of ~ 10^{-27} cm^3/s could explain the TeV gamma-ray emission observed in M87. A central dark matter spike is plausibly present around the supermassive black hole at the center of M87, for various, although not all, formation scenarios, and would have profound implications for our understanding of the dark matter microphysics.
[27]  oai:arXiv.org:1507.04962  [pdf] - 1412669
Shocking Signals of Dark Matter Annihilation
Comments: 9 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2015-07-17
We examine whether charged particles injected by self-annihilating Dark Matter into regions undergoing Diffuse Shock Acceleration (DSA) can be accelerated to high energies. We consider three astrophysical sites where shock acceleration is supposed to occur, namely the Galactic Centre, galaxy clusters and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). For the Milky Way, we find that the acceleration of cosmic rays injected by dark matter could lead to a bump in the cosmic ray spectrum provided that the product of the efficiency of the acceleration mechanism and the concentration of DM particles is high enough. Among the various acceleration sources that we consider (namely supernova remnants (SNRs), Fermi bubbles and AGN jets), we find that the Fermi bubbles are a potentially more efficient accelerator than SNRs. However both could in principle accelerate electrons and protons injected by dark matter to very high energies. At the extragalactic level, the acceleration of dark matter annihilation products could be responsible for enhanced radio emission from colliding clusters and prediction of an increase of the anti-deuteron flux generated near AGNs.
[28]  oai:arXiv.org:1412.4905  [pdf] - 978457
Dark matter-radiation interactions: the impact on dark matter haloes
Comments: 11 pages, 9 figures, 1 table
Submitted: 2014-12-16, last modified: 2015-02-27
Interactions between dark matter (DM) and radiation (photons or neutrinos) in the early Universe suppress density fluctuations on small mass scales. Here we perform a thorough analysis of structure formation in the fully non-linear regime using N-body simulations for models with DM-radiation interactions and compare the results to a traditional calculation in which DM only interacts gravitationally. Significant differences arise due to the presence of interactions, in terms of the number of low-mass DM haloes and their properties, such as their spin and density profile. These differences are clearly seen even for haloes more massive than the scale on which density fluctuations are suppressed. We also show that semi-analytical descriptions of the matter distribution in the non-linear regime fail to reproduce our numerical results, emphasizing the challenge of predicting structure formation in models with physics beyond collisionless DM.
[29]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.7012  [pdf] - 881894
Using the Milky Way satellites to study interactions between cold dark matter and radiation
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures. V2: Matches version in MNRAS Letters
Submitted: 2014-04-28, last modified: 2014-08-19
The cold dark matter (CDM) model faces persistent challenges on small scales. In particular, taken at face value, the model significantly overestimates the number of satellite galaxies around the Milky Way. Attempts to solve this problem remain open to debate and have even led some to abandon CDM altogether. However, current simulations are limited by the assumption that dark matter feels only gravity. Here, we show that including interactions between CDM and radiation (photons or neutrinos) leads to a dramatic reduction in the number of satellite galaxies, alleviating the Milky Way satellite problem and indicating that physics beyond gravity may be essential to make accurate predictions of structure formation on small scales. The methodology introduced here gives constraints on dark matter interactions that are significantly improved over those from the cosmic microwave background.
[30]  oai:arXiv.org:1403.1987  [pdf] - 862563
Fitting the Fermi-LAT GeV excess: On the importance of including the propagation of electrons from dark matter
Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures, matches published version
Submitted: 2014-03-08, last modified: 2014-08-12
An excess of gamma rays at GeV energies has been pointed out in the Fermi-LAT data. This signal comes from a narrow region centred around the Galactic center and has been interpreted as possible evidence for light dark matter particles annihilating either into a mixture of leptons-antileptons and b-bbar or into b-bbar only. Focusing on the prompt gamma-ray emission, previous works found that the best fit to the data corresponds to annihilations proceeding predominantly into b-bbar. However, here we show that omitting the photon emission originating from primary and secondary electrons produced in dark matter annihilations, and undergoing diffusion through the Galactic magnetic field, can actually lead to the wrong conclusion. Accounting for this emission, we find that not only are annihilations of ~ 10 GeV particles into a purely leptonic final state allowed, but the democratic scenario actually provides a better fit to the spectrum of the excess than the pure b-bbar channel. We conclude our work with a discussion on constraints on these leptophilic scenarios based on the AMS data and the morphology of the excess.
[31]  oai:arXiv.org:1406.4683  [pdf] - 860352
A possible link between the GeV excess and the 511 keV emission line in the Galactic Centre
Comments: 2 pages; 1 figure
Submitted: 2014-06-18, last modified: 2014-08-03
The morphology and characteristics of the so-called GeV gamma-ray excess detected in the Milky Way lead us to speculate about a possible common origin with the 511 keV line mapped by the SPI experiment about ten years ago. In the previous version of our paper, we assumed 30 GeV dark matter particles annihilating into $b \bar{b}$ and obtained both a morphology and a 511 keV flux (\phi_{511 keV} ~ 10^{-3} ph/cm^2/s) in agreement with SPI observation. However our estimates assumed a negligible number density of electrons in the bulge which lead to an artificial increase in the flux (mostly due to negligible Coulomb losses in this configuration). Assuming a number density greater than $n_e > 10^{-3} cm^{-3}$, we now obtain a flux of 511 keV photons that is smaller than \phi_{511 keV} ~ 10^{-6} ph/cm^2/s and is essentially in agreement with the 511 keV flux that one can infer from the total number of positrons injected by dark matter annihilations into $b \bar{b}$. We thus conclude that -- even if 30 GeV dark matter particles were to exist-- it is impossible to establish a connexion between the two types of signals, even though they are located within the same 10 deg region in the galactic centre.
[32]  oai:arXiv.org:1404.4977  [pdf] - 857801
A weighty interpretation of the Galactic Centre excess
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures. v2: Matches PRD version. Note: title of PRD version is "Interpretation of the Galactic Center excess of gamma rays with heavier dark matter particles"
Submitted: 2014-04-19, last modified: 2014-07-24
Previous attempts at explaining the gamma-ray excess near the Galactic Centre have focussed on dark matter annihilation directly into Standard Model particles. This results in a preferred dark matter mass of 30-40 GeV (if the annihilation is into b quarks) or 10 GeV (if it is into leptons). Here we show that the gamma-ray excess is also consistent with heavier dark matter particles; in models of secluded dark matter, dark matter with mass up to 76 GeV provides a good fit to the data. This occurs if the dark matter first annihilates to an on-shell particle that subsequently decays to Standard Model particles through a portal interaction. This is a generic process that works in models with annihilation, semi-annihilation or both. We explicitly demonstrate this in a model of hidden vector dark matter with an SU(2) gauge group in the hidden sector.
[33]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.6458  [pdf] - 821265
Extended gamma-ray emission from Coy Dark Matter
Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures. v2: Minor changes to match published (JCAP) version
Submitted: 2014-01-24, last modified: 2014-05-08
We show that it is possible for WIMP dark matter to produce a large signal in indirect dark matter searches without producing signals elsewhere. We illustrate our point by fitting the Fermi-LAT extended galactic gamma-ray excess with a simple model of Dirac dark matter that annihilates primarily into b quarks via a pseudoscalar. Current collider constraints are weak while the 14 TeV LHC run will constrain a limited portion of the parameter space. No signal is expected in additional indirect searches or at future direct detection experiments. Our results emphasise the importance of fully understanding potential indirect signals of dark matter as they may provide the only information about the dark matter particle.
[34]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.7588  [pdf] - 816788
Using the CMB angular power spectrum to study Dark Matter-photon interactions
Comments: 9 pages, 5 figures. V2: References added, minor clarifications. V3: Matches version in JCAP
Submitted: 2013-09-29, last modified: 2014-04-25
In this paper, we explore the impact of Dark Matter-photon interactions on the CMB angular power spectrum. Using the one-year data release of the Planck satellite, we derive an upper bound on the Dark Matter-photon elastic scattering cross section of sigma_{DM-photon} < 8 x 10^{-31} (m_DM/GeV) cm^2 (68% CL) if the cross section is constant and a present-day value of sigma_{DM-photon} < 6 x 10^{-40} (m_DM/GeV) cm^2 (68% CL) if it scales as the temperature squared. For such a limiting cross section, both the B-modes and the TT angular power spectrum are suppressed with respect to LCDM predictions for l > 500 and l > 3000 respectively, indicating that forthcoming data from CMB polarisation experiments and Planck could help to constrain and characterise the physics of the dark sector. This essentially initiates a new type of dark matter search that is independent of whether dark matter is annihilating, decaying or asymmetric. Thus, any CMB experiment with the ability to measure the temperature and/or polarisation power spectra at high l should be able to investigate the potential interactions of dark matter and contribute to our fundamental understanding of its nature.
[35]  oai:arXiv.org:1311.0139  [pdf] - 805871
Probing a dark matter density spike at the Galactic Center
Comments: 14 pages, 9 figures, minor changes to match published version
Submitted: 2013-11-01, last modified: 2014-04-03
The dark matter halo profile in the inner Galaxy is very uncertain. Yet its radial dependence toward the Galactic Center is of crucial importance for the determination of the gamma-ray and radio fluxes originating from dark matter annihilations. Here we use synchrotron emission to probe the dark matter energy distribution in the inner Galaxy. We first solve the problem of the cosmic ray diffusion on very small scales, typically smaller than 10^{-3} pc, by using a Green's function approach and use this technique to quantify the effect of a spiky profile (rho(r) ~ r^{-7/3}) on the morphology and intensity of the synchrotron emission expected from dark matter. We illustrate our results using 10 and 800 GeV candidate weakly interacting dark matter particles annihilating directly into e+ e-. Our most critical assumptions are that the dark matter is heavier than a few GeV and directly produces a reasonable amount of electrons and positrons in the Galaxy. We conclude that dark matter indirect detection techniques (including the Planck experiment) could be used to shed light on the dark matter halo profile on scales that lie beyond the capability of any current numerical simulations.
[36]  oai:arXiv.org:1208.1850  [pdf] - 783390
A New Method for Analysing Dark Matter Direct Detection Data
Comments: v3: Updated to match version accepted to PRD. Contains a discussion now also of the LUX experiment. 10 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2012-08-09, last modified: 2014-02-12
The experimental situation of Dark Matter Direct Detection has reached an exciting cross-roads, with potential hints of a discovery of Dark Matter (DM) from the CDMS, CoGeNT, CRESST-II and DAMA experiments in tension with null-results from xenon-based experiments such as XENON100 and LUX. Given the present controversial experimental status, it is important that the analytical method used to search for DM in Direct Detection experiments is both robust and flexible enough to deal with data for which the distinction between signal and background points is difficult, and hence where the choice between setting a limit or defining a discovery region is debatable. In this article we propose a novel (Bayesian) analytical method, which can be applied to all Direct Detection experiments and which extracts the maximum amount of information from the data. We apply our method to the XENON100 experiment data as a worked example, and show that firstly our exclusion limit at 90% confidence is in agreement with their own for the 225 Live Days data, but is several times stronger for the 100 Live Days data. Secondly we find that, due to the two points at low values of S1 and S2 in the 225 days data-set, our analysis points to either weak consistency with low-mass Dark Matter or the possible presence of an unknown background. Given the null-result from LUX, the latter scenario seems the more plausible.
[37]  oai:arXiv.org:1401.7597  [pdf] - 822145
Constraining Dark Matter-Neutrino Interactions using the CMB and Large-Scale Structure
Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2014-01-29
We present a new study on the elastic scattering cross section of dark matter (DM) and neutrinos using the latest cosmological data from Planck and large-scale structure experiments. We find that the strongest constraints are set by the Lyman-alpha forest, giving sigma_{DM-neutrino} < 10^{-33} (m_DM/GeV) cm^2 if the cross section is constant and a present-day value of sigma_{DM-neutrino} < 10^{-45} (m_DM/GeV) cm^2 if it scales as the temperature squared. These are the most robust limits on DM-neutrino interactions to date, demonstrating that one can use the distribution of matter in the Universe to probe dark ("invisible") interactions. Additionally, we show that scenarios involving thermal MeV DM and a constant elastic scattering cross section naturally predict (i) a cut-off in the matter power spectrum at the Lyman-alpha scale, (ii) N_eff ~ 3.5 +/- 0.4, (iii) H_0 ~ 71 +/- 3 km/s/Mpc and (iv) the possible generation of neutrino masses.
[38]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.7139  [pdf] - 715516
Violation of the FRW consistency condition as a signature of backreaction
Comments: 24 pages, 14 figures. v2: Corrected binning in figure 1, added a reference. v3: Published version. Added clarifications and a reference
Submitted: 2013-05-30, last modified: 2013-09-04
We propose a backreaction toy model with realistic features and confront it with the Union2.1 supernova data. The model provides a good fit even though the expansion history is quite different from the LCDM model and the effective equation of state is far from -1. We discuss compatibility (or lack thereof) with other observations. We show that the FRW consistency condition between distance and expansion rate is violated with an amplitude that is slightly below the current observational limits. We expect that this is also the case in the real universe if backreaction is significant, providing a distinct signature of backreaction.
[39]  oai:arXiv.org:1303.5386  [pdf] - 880154
Naturalness of Light Neutralino Dark Matter in pMSSM after LHC, XENON100 and Planck Data
Comments: 26 pages, 3 tables, 6 figures; updated Figures 4 and 5; version accepted for publication in JHEP
Submitted: 2013-03-21, last modified: 2013-06-06
We examine the possibility of a light (below 46 GeV) neutralino dark matter (DM) candidate within the 19-parameter phenomenological Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (pMSSM) in the light of various recent experimental results, especially from the LHC, XENON100, and Planck. We also study the extent of electroweak fine-tuning for such a light neutralino scenario in view of the null results from the searches for supersymmetry so far. Using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo likelihood analysis of the full pMSSM parameter space, we find that a neutralino DM with mass > 10 GeV can in principle still satisfy all the existing constraints. Our light neutralino solutions can be broadly divided into two regions: (i) The solutions in the 10 - 30 GeV neutralino mass range are highly fine-tuned and require the existence of light selectrons (below 100 GeV) in order to satisfy the observed DM relic density. We note that these are not yet conclusively ruled out by the existing LEP/LHC results, and a dedicated analysis valid for a non-unified gaugino mass spectrum is required to exclude this possibility. (ii) The solutions with low fine-tuning are mainly in the 30 - 46 GeV neutralino mass range. However, a major portion of it is already ruled out by the latest XENON100 upper limits on its spin-independent direct detection cross section, and the rest of the allowed points are within the XENON1T projected limit. Thus, we show that the allowed MSSM parameter space for a light neutralino DM below the LEP limit of 46 GeV, possible in supersymmetric models without gaugino mass unification, could be completely accessible in near future. This might be useful in view of the recent claims for positive hints of a DM signal in some direct detection experiments.
[40]  oai:arXiv.org:1211.2639  [pdf] - 1157689
Observing Higgs boson production through its decay into gamma-rays: A messenger for Dark Matter candidates
Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures. V2: Final version published in PLB
Submitted: 2012-11-12, last modified: 2013-05-24
In this Letter, we study the gamma-ray signatures subsequent to the production of a Higgs boson in space by dark matter annihilations. We investigate the cases where the Higgs boson is produced at rest or slightly boosted and show that such configurations can produce characteristic bumps in the gamma-ray data. These results are relevant in the case of the Standard Model-like Higgs boson provided that the dark matter mass is about 63 GeV, 109 GeV or 126 GeV, but can be generalised to any other Higgs boson masses. Here, we point out that it may be worth looking for a 63 GeV line since it could be the signature of the decay of a Standard Model-like Higgs boson produced in space, as in the case of a di-Higgs final state if m_DM ~ 126 GeV. We show that one can set generic constraints on the Higgs boson production rates using its decay properties. In particular, using the Fermi-LAT data from the galactic center, we find that the dark matter annihilation cross section into gamma + a Standard Model-like Higgs boson produced at rest or near rest cannot exceed <sigma v> ~ a few 10^-25 cm^3/s or <sigma v> ~ a few 10^-27 cm^3/s respectively, providing us with information on the Higgs coupling to the dark matter particle. We conclude that Higgs bosons can indeed be used as messengers to explore the dark matter mass range.
[41]  oai:arXiv.org:1205.2815  [pdf] - 622861
Probing the Supersymmetric Inflaton and Dark Matter link via the CMB, LHC and XENON1T experiments
Comments: 16 pages, 23 figures; v2: typos corrected; v3: version accepted by PRD
Submitted: 2012-05-12, last modified: 2013-02-05
The primordial inflation dilutes all matter except the quantum fluctuations which we see in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. Therefore the last phases of inflation must be embedded within a beyond the Standard Model (SM) sector where the inflaton can directly excite the SM quarks and leptons. In this paper we consider two inflaton candidates LLe and udd whose decay can naturally excite all the relevant degrees of freedom besides thermalizing the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) during and after reheating. In particular, we present the regions of the parameter space which can yield successful inflation with the right temperature anisotropy in the CMB, the observed relic density for the neutralino LSP, and the recent Higgs mass constraints from LHC within the MSSM with non-universal Higgs masses -- referred to as the NUHM2 model. We found that in most scenarios, the LSP seems strongly mass degenerated with the next to lightest LSP (NLSP) and the branching ratio B_s -> mu^+ mu^- very close to the present bound, thus leading to falsifiable predictions. Also the dark matter interactions with XENON nuclei would fall within the projected range for the XENON1T experiment. In the case of a positive signal of low scale supersymmetry at the LHC, one would be able to potentially pin down the inflaton mass by using the associated values for the mass of the stau, the stop and the neutralino.
[42]  oai:arXiv.org:1207.0497  [pdf] - 1124547
Increasing Neff with particles in thermal equilibrium with neutrinos
Comments: 10 pages, 5 figures v2 matches version to appear in JCAP
Submitted: 2012-07-02, last modified: 2012-12-17
Recent work on increasing the effective number of neutrino species (Neff) in the early universe has focussed on introducing extra relativistic species (`dark radiation'). We draw attention to another possibility: a new particle of mass less than 10 MeV that remains in thermal equilibrium with neutrinos until it becomes non-relativistic increases the neutrino temperature relative to the photons. We demonstrate that this leads to a value of Neff that is greater than three and that Neff at CMB formation is larger than at BBN. We investigate the constraints on such particles from the primordial abundance of helium and deuterium created during BBN and from the CMB power spectrum measured by ACT and SPT and find that they are presently relatively unconstrained. We forecast the sensitivity of the Planck satellite to this scenario: in addition to dramatically improving constraints on the particle mass, in some regions of parameter space it can discriminate between the new particle being a real or complex scalar.
[43]  oai:arXiv.org:1208.5009  [pdf] - 1150884
PAMELA and FERMI-LAT limits on the neutralino-chargino mass degeneracy
Comments: 22pages
Submitted: 2012-08-24
Searches for Dark Matter (DM) particles with indirect detection techniques have reached important milestones with the precise measurements of the anti-proton and gamma-ray spectra, notably by the PAMELA and FERMI-LAT experiments. While the gamma-ray results have been used to test the thermal Dark Matter hypothesis and constrain the Dark Matter annihilation cross section into Standard Model (SM) particles, the anti-proton flux measured by the PAMELA experiment remains relatively unexploited. Here we show that the latter can be used to set a constraint on the neutralino-chargino mass difference. To illustrate our point we use a Supersymmetric model in which the gauginos are light, the sfermions are heavy and the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP) is the neutralino. In this framework the W^+ W^- production is expected to be significant, thus leading to large anti-proton and gamma-ray fluxes. After determining a generic limit on the Dark Matter pair annihilation cross section into W^+ W^- from the anti-proton data only, we show that one can constrain scenarios in which the neutralino-chargino mass difference is as large as ~ 20 GeV for a mixed neutralino (and intermediate choices of the anti-proton propagation scheme). This result is consistent with the limit obtained by using the FERMI-LAT data. As a result, we can safely rule out the pure wino neutralino hypothesis if it is lighter than 450 GeV and constitutes all the Dark Matter.
[44]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.3446  [pdf] - 559726
The 125 GeV Higgs in the NMSSM in light of LHC results and astrophysics constraints
Comments: 9 pages, 9 figures; v2 references added, minor clarifications, version accepted by PRD
Submitted: 2012-03-15, last modified: 2012-08-01
Recent LHC data suggest an excess in the Higgs decay channels into gamma gamma, W W and Z Z at roughly 125 GeV. The current excess in the diphoton channel is twice that expected from a Standard Model Higgs; whilst this may well change with more statistics, it is interesting to consider the implications should the result persist. Here, we assess whether the NMSSM with a neutralino dark matter candidate could explain this excess when astrophysical constraints (e.g. no overproduction of gamma rays and radio emission in the galaxy, no anomalous excess in the dark matter direct detection experiments and no dark matter overabundance) are imposed on the neutralino. This enables us to disregard unphysical regions of the parameter space even though the Higgs signal is compatible with the observed excess. The result of our analysis is that there are configurations of the parameter space which can explain the signal strength reported by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations for a Higgs mass within the required range. Should the observed signal strength finally be compatible with Standard Model expectations, it would be difficult to distinguish between the discovery of Standard Model Higgs and a SM-like Higgs from the NMSSM, unless one performs dedicated searches of very light Higgs bosons and possibly investigate peculiar signatures of supersymmetric particles. We also propose a new jets + missing E_T signal for the case where the LSP is a singlino-like neutralino.
[45]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.6823  [pdf] - 673016
The XENON100 exclusion limit without considering Leff as a nuisance parameter
Comments: 10 pages;, 9 figures; references added
Submitted: 2012-03-30, last modified: 2012-04-05
In 2011, the XENON100 experiment has set unprecedented constraints on dark matter-nucleon interactions, excluding dark matter candidates with masses down to 6 GeV if the corresponding cross section is larger than 10^{-39} cm^2. The dependence of the exclusion limit in terms of the scintillation efficiency (Leff) has been debated at length. To overcome possible criticisms XENON100 performed an analysis in which Leff was considered as a nuisance parameter and its uncertainties were profiled out by using a Gaussian likelihood in which the mean value corresponds to the best fit Leff value smoothly extrapolated to zero below 3 keVnr. Although such a method seems fairly robust, it does not account for more extreme types of extrapolation nor does it enable to anticipate on how much the exclusion limit would vary if new data were to support a flat behaviour for Leff below 3 keVnr, for example. Yet, such a question is crucial for light dark matter models which are close to the published XENON100 limit. To answer this issue, we use a maximum Likelihood ratio analysis, as done by the XENON100 collaboration, but do not consider Leff as a nuisance parameter. Instead, Leff is obtained directly from the fits to the data. This enables us to define frequentist confidence intervals by marginalising over Leff.
[46]  oai:arXiv.org:1009.4380  [pdf] - 299014
Can neutralinos in the MSSM and NMSSM scenarios still be light?
Comments: 10p; 12 figures
Submitted: 2010-09-22, last modified: 2010-10-04
Since the recent results of direct detection experiments at low mass, many authors have revisited the case of light (1 -10) GeV WIMPs. In particular, there have been a few attempts to explain the results from the DAMA/LIBRA, CDMS and/or CoGeNT experiments by invoking neutralinos lighter than 15 GeV. Here we show that in the MSSM, such light particles are completely ruled out by the TEVATRON limits on the mass of the pseudoscalar Higgs. On the contrary, in the NMSSM, we find that light neutralinos could still be viable candidates. In fact, in some cases, they may even have an elastic scattering cross section on nucleons in the range that is needed to explain either the DAMA/LIBRA, CoGeNT or CDMS recent results. Finally, we revisit the lowest limit on the neutralino mass in the MSSM and find that neutralinos should be heavier than ~28 GeV to evade present experimental bounds.
[47]  oai:arXiv.org:1008.5175  [pdf] - 234326
Radio observations of the Galactic Centre and the Coma cluster as a probe of light dark matter self-annihilations and decay
Comments: Revised version. Numerical factors and typos corrected. Results have changed but the conclusions remain unchanged. 12p; 12 Figures
Submitted: 2010-08-30, last modified: 2010-09-30
We update our earlier calculations of gamma ray and radio observational constraints on annihilations of dark matter particles lighter than 10 GeV. We predict the synchrotron spectrum as well as the morphology of the radio emission associated with light decaying and annihilating dark matter candidates in both the Coma cluster and the Galactic Centre. Our new results basically confirm our previous findings: synchrotron emission in the very inner part of the Milky Way constrains or even excludes dark matter candidates if the magnetic field is larger than 50 micro Gauss. In fact, our results suggest that light annihilating candidates must have a S-wave suppressed pair annihilation cross section into electrons (or the branching ratio into electron positron must be small). If dark matter is decaying, it must have a life time that is larger than t = 3. 10^{25} s. Therefore, radio emission should always be considered when one proposes a "light" dark matter candidate.
[48]  oai:arXiv.org:1009.4620  [pdf] - 1040789
The 511 keV emission from positron annihilation in the Galaxy
Comments: 62 pages, 35 figures. Review paper to appear in Reviews of Modern Physics
Submitted: 2010-09-23
The first gamma-ray line originating from outside the solar system that was ever detected is the 511 keV emission from positron annihilation in the Galaxy. Despite 30 years of intense theoretical and observational investigation, the main sources of positrons have not been identified up to now. Observations in the 1990's with OSSE/CGRO showed that the emission is strongly concentrated towards the Galactic bulge. In the 2000's, the SPI instrument aboard ESA's INTEGRAL gamma-ray observatory allowed scientists to measure that emission across the entire Galaxy, revealing that the bulge/disk luminosity ratio is larger than observed in any other wavelength. This mapping prompted a number of novel explanations, including rather "exotic ones (e.g. dark matter annihilation). However, conventional astrophysical sources, like type Ia supernovae, microquasars or X-ray binaries, are still plausible candidates for a large fraction of the observed total 511 keV emission of the bulge. A closer study of the subject reveals new layers of complexity, since positrons may propagate far away from their production sites, making it difficult to infer the underlying source distribution from the observed map of 511 keV emission. However, contrary to the rather well understood propagation of high energy (>GeV) particles of Galactic cosmic rays, understanding the propagation of low energy (~MeV) positrons in the turbulent, magnetized interstellar medium, still remains a formidable challenge. We review the spectral and imaging properties of the observed 511 keV emission and we critically discuss candidate positron sources and models of positron propagation in the Galaxy.
[49]  oai:arXiv.org:0907.4511  [pdf] - 901514
Implication of the PAMELA antiproton data for dark matter indirect detection at LHC
Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, captions of some figures modified, main conclusion unchanged
Submitted: 2009-07-27, last modified: 2010-04-28
Since the PAMELA results on the "anomalously" high positron fraction and the lack of antiproton excess in our Galaxy, there has been a tremendous number of studies advocating new types of dark matter, with larger couplings to electrons than to quarks. This raises the question of the production of dark matter particles (and heavy associated coloured states) at LHC. Here, we explore a very simple benchmark dark matter model and show that, in spite of the agreement between the PAMELA antiproton measurements and the expected astrophysical secondary background, there is room for large couplings of a WIMP candidate to heavy quarks. Contrary to what could have been naively anticipated, the PAMELA pbar/p measurements do not challenge dark matter model building, as far as the quark sector is concerned. A quarkophillic species is therefore not forbidden.Owing to these large couplings, one would expect that a new production channel opens up at the LHC, through quark--quark and quark--gluon interactions. Alas, when the PDF of the quark is taken into account, prospects for a copious production fade away.
[50]  oai:arXiv.org:1003.1225  [pdf] - 291968
Can the morphology of gamma-ray emission distinguish annihilating from decaying dark matter?
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2010-03-05
The recent results from the PAMELA, ATIC, FERMI and HESS experiments have focused attention on the possible existence of high energy cosmic ray e^+ e^- that may originate from dark matter (DM) annihilations or decays in the Milky Way. Here we examine the morphology of the gamma-ray emission after propagation of the electrons generated by both annihilating and decaying dark matter models. We focus on photon energies of 1 GeV, 10 GeV, 50 GeV (relevant for the FERMI satellite) and consider different propagation parameters. Our main conclusion is that distinguishing annihilating from decaying dark matter may only be possible if the propagation parameters correspond to the most optimistic diffusion models. In addition, we point to examples where morphology can lead to an erroneous interpretation of the source injection energy.
[51]  oai:arXiv.org:0907.5589  [pdf] - 1003218
On the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect from dark matter annihilation or decay in galaxy clusters
Comments: 27 p, 6 figs, additional section on spatial diffusion effects. Accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2009-07-31, last modified: 2010-01-27
We revisit the prospects for detecting the Sunyaev Zel'dovich (SZ) effect induced by dark matter (DM) annihilation or decay. We show that with standard (or even extreme) assumptions for DM properties, the optical depth associated with relativistic electrons injected from DM annihilation or decay is much smaller than that associated with thermal electrons, when averaged over the angular resolution of current and future experiments. For example, we find: $\tau_{\rm DM} \sim 10^{-9}-10^{-5}$ (depending on the assumptions) for $\mchi = 1$ GeV and a density profile $\rho\propto r^{-1}$ for a template cluster located at 50 Mpc and observed within an angular resolution of $10"$, compared to $\tau_{\rm th}\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-2}$. This, together with a full spectral analysis, enables us to demonstrate that, for a template cluster with generic properties, the SZ effect due to DM annihilation or decay is far below the sensitivity of the Planck satellite. This is at variance with previous claims regarding heavier annihilating DM particles. Should DM be made of lighter particles, the current constraints from 511 keV observations on the annihilation cross section or decay rate still prevent a detectable SZ effect. Finally, we show that spatial diffusion sets a core of a few kpc in the electron distribution, even for very cuspy DM profiles, such that improving the angular resolution of the instrument, e.g. with ALMA, does not necessarily improve the detection potential. We provide useful analytical formulae parameterized in terms of the DM mass, decay rate or annihilation cross section and DM halo features, that allow quick estimates of the SZ effect induced by any given candidate and any DM halo profile.
[52]  oai:arXiv.org:0812.3282  [pdf] - 19616
Clarifying the covariant formalism for the SZ effect due to relativistic non-thermal electrons
Comments: 12 pages. Error in the interpretation of E. Wright's earlier results corrected. Accepted for publication in PRD
Submitted: 2008-12-17, last modified: 2009-02-25
We derive the covariant formalism associated with the relativistic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect due to a non-thermal population of high energy electrons in clusters of galaxies. More precisely, we show that the formalism proposed by Wright in 1979, based on an empirical approach (and widely used in the literature) to compute the inverse Compton scattering of a population of relativistic electrons on CMB photons, can actually be re-interpreted as a Boltzmann-like equation, in the single scattering approximation.
[53]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0612228  [pdf] - 387164
Are small neutrino masses unveiling the missing mass problem of the Universe?
Comments: 4pages, 2 figures. Two paragraphs have been added. One for the complex case; the other one for the UV completion
Submitted: 2006-12-19, last modified: 2007-01-03
We present a scenario in which a remarkably simple relation linking dark matter properties and neutrino masses naturally emerges. This framework points towards a low energy theory where the neutrino mass originates from the existence of a light scalar dark matter particle in the MeV mass range. A very surprising aspect of this scenario is that the required MeV dark matter is one of the favoured candidates to explain the mysterious emission of 511 keV photons in the centre of our galaxy. A possible interpretation of these findings is that dark matter is the stepping stone of a theory beyond the standard model instead of being an embarrassing relic whose energy density must be accounted for in any successful model building.
[54]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507142  [pdf] - 74311
Constraints on dark matter and the shape of the Milky Way dark halo from the 511 keV line
Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2005-07-06, last modified: 2006-09-07
About one year ago, it was speculated that decaying or annihilating Light Dark Matter (LDM) particles could explain the flux and extension of the 511 keV line emission in the galactic centre. Here we present a thorough comparison between theoretical expectations of the galactic positron distribution within the LDM scenario and observational data from INTEGRAL/SPI. Unlike previous analyses, there is now enough statistical evidence to put tight constraints on the shape of the dark matter halo of our galaxy, if the galactic positrons originate from dark matter. For annihilating candidates, the best fit to the observed 511 keV emission is provided by a radial density profile with inner logarithmic slope gamma=1.03+-0.04. In contrast, decaying dark matter requires a much steeper density profile, gamma>1.5, rather disfavoured by both observations and numerical simulations. Within the annihilating LDM scenario, a velocity-independent cross-section would be consistent with the observational data while a cross-section purely proportional to v^2 can be rejected at a high confidence level. Assuming the most simplistic model where the galactic positrons are produced as primaries, we show that the LDM candidate should be a scalar rather than a spin-1/2 particle and obtain a very stringent constraint on the value of the positron production cross-section to explain the 511 keV emission. One consequence is that the value of the fine structure constant should differ from that recommended in the CODATA. This is a very strong test for the LDM scenario and an additional motivation in favour of experiments measuring alpha directly. Our results finally indicate that an accurate measurement of the shape of the dark halo profile could have a tremendous impact on the determination of the origin of the 511 keV line and vice versa.
[55]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0607437  [pdf] - 83640
Light Dark Matter Annihilations into Two Photons
Comments: 7 pages
Submitted: 2006-07-19
We compute the pair annihilation cross section of light (spin-0) dark matter particles into two photons and discuss the detectability of the monochromatic line associated with these annihilations.
[56]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0505519  [pdf] - 73289
Large Scale Structure in Bekenstein's theory of relativistic Modified Newtonian Dynamics
Comments: typos corrected, matches published version (upto different figure placements!), no changes to the results
Submitted: 2005-05-26, last modified: 2006-02-08
A relativistic theory of modified gravity has been recently proposed by Bekenstein. The tensor field in Einstein's theory of gravity is replaced by a scalar, a vector, and a tensor field which interact in such a way to give Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) in the weak-field non-relativistic limit. We study the evolution of the universe in such a theory, identifying its key properties and comparing it with the standard cosmology obtained in Einstein gravity. The evolution of the scalar field is akin to that of tracker quintessence fields. We expand the theory to linear order to find the evolution of perturbations on large scales. The impact on galaxy distributions and the cosmic microwave background is calculated in detail. We show that it may be possible to reproduce observations of the cosmic microwave background and galaxy distributions with Bekenstein's theory of MOND.
[57]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0311150  [pdf] - 60730
Possible Evidence for MeV Dark Matter In Dwarf Spheroidals
Comments: 4 pages, no figures. Version accepted by Physical Review Letters
Submitted: 2003-11-06, last modified: 2004-11-29
It has been recently proposed that the observed 511 keV emission from the Galactic bulge could be the product of very light (1-100 MeV) annihilating dark matter particles. Other possible explanations for this signal are associated with stellar objects, such as hypernovae. In order to distinguish between annihilating light dark matter scenario and more conventional astrophysical sources for the bulge emission, we here propose the study of dwarf spheroidals such as Sagittarius. These galaxies have typical luminosities of $10^5 L_\odot$ but mass-to-light ratios of $\sim 100$. As there are comparatively few stars, the prospects for 511 keV emission from standard astrophysical scenarios are minimal. The dwarf spheroidals do, however, contain copious amounts of dark matter. INTEGRAL/SPI has observed the Sagittarius region. Analysis of this data for 511 keV emission will provide a test of MeV dark matter which can distinguish between annihilating dark matter and more standard astrophysics. The observation of such a signal from Sagittarius should be a ``smoking gun'' for MeV dark matter.
[58]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0410591  [pdf] - 68440
Constraints on Dark Matter interactions from structure formation: Damping lengths
Comments: 35p
Submitted: 2004-10-25
(Shortened) Weakly Interacting Massive Particles are often said to be the best Dark Matter candidates. Studies have shown however that rather large Dark Matter-photon or Dark Matter-baryon interactions could be allowed by cosmology. Here we address the question of the role of the Dark Matter interactions in more detail to determine at which extent Dark Matter has to be necessarily weakly interacting. To this purpose, we compute the collisional damping (and free-streaming) lengths of generic interacting Dark Matter candidates and compare them to the scale of the smallest primordial structures known to exist in the Universe. We obtain necessary conditions that any candidate must satisfy. We point out the existence of new Dark Matter scenarios and exhibit new damping regimes. For example, an interacting candidate may bear a similar damping than that of collisionless Warm Dark Matter particles. The main difference is due to the Dark Matter coupling to interacting (or even freely-propagating) species. Our approach yields a general classification of Dark Matter candidates which extends the definitions of the usual Cold, Warm and Hot Dark Matter scenarios when interactions, weak or strong, are considered.
[59]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309686  [pdf] - 59513
MeV Dark Matter: Has It Been Detected?
Comments: 4 pages, 1 figure
Submitted: 2003-09-25, last modified: 2003-10-06
We discuss the possibility that the recent detection of 511 keV gamma-rays from the galactic bulge, as observed by INTEGRAL, is a consequence of low mass (~MeV) particle dark matter annihilations. We discuss the type of halo profile favored by the observations as well as the size of the annihilation cross section needed to account for the signal. We find that such a scenario is consistent with the observed dark matter relic density and other constraints from astrophysics and particle physics.
[60]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309652  [pdf] - 59479
WIMP matter power spectra and small scale power generation
Comments: 13 pages, 3 figures
Submitted: 2003-09-24
Dark Matter (DM) is generally assumed to be massive, cold and collisionless from the structure formation point of view. A more correct statement however is that DM indeed experiences collisional damping, but on a scale which is supposed to be too small to be relevant for structure formation. The aim of this paper is to present a Cold (although ``collisional'') Dark Matter particle whose matter power spectrum is damped and see whether it is distinguishable from standard candidates. To achieve this purpose, we calculate the collisional damping and free-streaming scales of neutralinos and non conventional candidates (say light particles heavier than ~1 MeV but lighter than O(10) GeV). The latter can be considered as Cold Dark Matter (CDM) particles in the sense that they become non relativistic before their thermal decoupling epoch. Unlike neutralinos, however, their linear matter power spectrum can be damped on scales of ~ 10^3 Msol due to their interactions. Since these scales are of cosmological interest for structure formation, we perform a series of numerical simulations to obtain the corresponding non linear matter power spectra P(k)_{nl} at the present epoch. We show that because of small scale regeneration, they all resemble each other at low redshifts, i.e. become very similar to a typical CDM matter power spectrum on all but the smallest scales. Therefore, even if lensing measurements at redshift below unity were to yield a P(k)_{nl} consistent with CDM models, this would not constitute a sufficiently robust evidence in favour of the neutralino to rule out alternative DM candidates.
[61]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208458  [pdf] - 51274
Can annihilating Dark Matter be lighter than a few GeVs?
Comments: 4 pages. No figure. Values corrected (last column Table.1). Text clarified. Conclusions unchanged
Submitted: 2002-08-26, last modified: 2003-06-26
We estimate the gamma ray fluxes from the residual annihilations of Dark Matter particles having a mass mdm \in [MeV, O(GeV)] and compare them to observations. We find that particles lighter than O(100 MeV) are excluded unless their cross section is S-wave suppressed.
[62]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0112522  [pdf] - 46895
Interacting Dark Matter disguised as Warm Dark Matter
Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures, to appear in PRD
Submitted: 2001-12-21, last modified: 2002-09-11
We explore some of the consequences of Dark Matter-photon interactions on structure formation, focusing on the evolution of cosmological perturbations and performing both an analytical and a numerical study. We compute the cosmic microwave background anisotropies and matter power spectrum in this class of models. We find, as the main result, that when Dark Matter and photons are coupled, Dark Matter perturbations can experience a new damping regime in addition to the usual collisional Silk damping effect. Such Dark Matter particles (having quite large photon interactions) behave like Cold Dark Matter or Warm Dark Matter as far as the cosmic microwave background anisotropies or matter power spectrum are concerned, respectively. These Dark Matter-photon interactions leave specific imprints at sufficiently small scales on both of these two spectra, which may allow to put new constraints on the acceptable photon-Dark Matter interactions. Under the conservative assumption that the abundance of 10^12 M_sol galaxies is correctly given by Cold Dark Matter, and without any knowledge of the abundance of smaller objects, we obtain the limit on the ratio of the Dark Matter-photon cross section to the Dark Matter mass sigma_{gamma-DM} / m_DM < 10^-6 sigma_Thomson / 100 GeV \sim 6 * 10^-33 cm^2 GeV^-1 .
[63]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0205406  [pdf] - 49480
Constraining the strength of Dark Matter Interactions from Structure Formation
Comments: 12 pages. Invited talk at DARK 2002, 4th Int. Conf. on Dark Matter in Astro and Particle Physics, Cape Town, Feb. 2002
Submitted: 2002-05-23
We discuss the damping of primordial dark matter fluctuations, taking into account explicitly the interactions of dark matter - whatever their intensity - both with itself and with other particle species. Relying on a general classification of dark matter particle candidates, our analysis provides, from structure formation, a new set of constraints on the dark matter particle mass and interaction rates (in particular with photons and neutrinos). This determines up to which cross sections the dark matter interactions may effectively be disregarded, and when they start playing an essential role, either through collisional damping or through an enhancement of the free-streaming scale. It leads us to extend the notions of Cold, Warm and Hot Dark Matter scenarios when dark matter interactions are no longer taken to be negligible. It also suggests the possibility of new scenarios of Collisional Warm Dark Matter, with moderate damping induced by dark matter interactions.
[64]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0012504  [pdf] - 40093
Constraining Dark Matter candidates from structure formation
Comments: 9 pages, 1 figure. Our results on induced-damping were initially expressed in terms of momentum-weighted average cross-sections. We precise how these are related to ordinary cross-sections
Submitted: 2000-12-27, last modified: 2001-04-01
We show that collisional damping of adiabatic primordial fluctuations yields constraints on the possible range of mass and interaction rates of Dark Matter particles. Our analysis relies on a general classification of Dark Matter candidates, that we establish independently of any specific particle theory or model. From a relation between the collisional damping scale and the Dark Matter interaction rate, we find that Dark Matter candidates must have cross-sections at decoupling smaller than $ 10^{-33} \frac{m_{dm}}{1 MeV} cm^2$ with photons and $10^{-37} \frac{m_{dm}}{1 MeV} cm^2$ with neutrinos, to explain the observed primordial structures of $10^9$ Solar mass. These damping constraints are particularly relevant for Warm Dark Matter candidates. They also leave open less known regions of parameter space corresponding to particles having rather high interaction rates with other species than neutrinos and photons.
[65]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/9705204  [pdf] - 116015
Could Electromagnetic Corrections Solve The Vorton Excess Problem ?
Comments: 10 pp RevTeX and 6 eps figures
Submitted: 1997-05-01
The modifications of circular cosmic string loop dynamics due to the electromagnetic self-interaction are calculated and shown to reduce the available phase space for reaching classical vorton states, thereby decreasing their remnant abundance. Use is made of the duality between master-function and Lagrangian formalisms on an explicit model.