sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Bockelman, B.

Normalized to: Bockelman, B.

3 article(s) in total. 238 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 14,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1903.04615  [pdf] - 1919965
The US Program in Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Science: Contribution from the LIGO Laboratory
Reitze, David; Abbott, Rich; Adams, Carl; Adhikari, Rana; Aggarwal, Nancy; Anand, Shreya; Ananyeva, Alena; Anderson, Stuart; Appert, Stephen; Arai, Koji; Araya, Melody; Aston, Stuart; Barayoga, Juan; Barish, Barry; Barker, David; Barsotti, Lisa; Bartlett, Jeffrey; Betzwieser, Joseph; Billingsley, GariLynn; Biscans, Sebastien; Biscoveanu, Sylvia; Blackburn, Kent; Blair, Carl; Blair, Ryan; Bockelman, Brian; Bork, Rolf; Bramley, Alyssa; Brooks, Aidan; Brunett, Sharon; Buikema, Aaron; Cahillane, Craig; Callister, Thomas; Carruthers, Tom; Clara, Filiberto; Corban, Paul; Coughlin, Michael; Couvares, Peter; Cowart, Matthew; Coyne, Dennis; Demos, Nicholas; Donovan, Fred; Driggers, Jenne; Dwyer, Sheila; Effler, Anamaria; Eisenstein, Robert; Etzel, Todd; Evans, Matthew; Evans, Tom; Feicht, Jon; Fernandez-Galiana, Alvaro; Fritschel, Peter; Frolov, Valery; Fyffe, Michael; Gateley, Bubba; Giaime, Joe; Giardina, Dwayne; Goetz, Evan; Gossan, Sarah; Gras, Slawomir; Grassia, Philippe; Gray, Corey; Gupta, Anchal; Gustafson, Eric; Guthman, Les; Hall, Evan; Hanks, Jonathan; Hanson, Joe; Hasskew, Raine; Haster, Carl-Johan; Heintze, Matthew; Hernandez, Edgar; Holt, Kathy; Huang, Yiwen; Huynh-Dinh, Tien; Isi, Max; Jones, Jeff; Kamai, Brittany; Kanner, Jonah; Kasprzack, Marie; Katsavounidis, Erik; Katzman, William; Kawabe, Keita; King, Peter; Kissel, Jeffrey; Kondrashov, Veronica; Korth, William; Kozak, Dan; Kumar, Rahul; Landry, Michael; Lane, Benjamin; Lanza, Robert; Laxen, Michael; Lazzarini, Albert; Lecoeuche, Yannick; Libbrecht, Ken; Lo, Ka-Lok; London, Lionel; Lormand, Marc; MacInnis, Myron; Mansell, Georgia; Markowitz, Aaron; Maros, Ed; Marx, Jay; Mason, Ken; Massinger, Thomas; Matichard, Fabrice; Mavalvala, Nergis; McCarthy, Richard; McCormick, Scott; McCuller, Lee; McIver, Jessica; Mendell, Gregory; Merilh, Edmond; Meshkov, Syd; Mittleman, Richard; Moraru, Dan; Moreno, Gerardo; Mullavey, Adam; Nelson, Timothy; Ng, Kwan-Yeung; Noh, Minkyun; O'Reilly, Brian; Oberling, Jason; Oram, Richard; Osthelder, Charles; Overmier, Harry; Parker, William; Pedraza, Mike; Pele, Arnaud; Perez, Carlos; Petterson, Danielle; Pirello, Marc; Raab, Fred; Radkins, Hugh; Mohapatra, Satyanarayan Ray Pitambar; Richardson, Jonathan; Robertson, Norna; Rollins, Jameson; Romel, Chandra; Romie, Janeen; Ryan, Kyle; Sadecki, Travis; Sanchez, Eduardo; Sanchez, Luis; Savage, Richard; Schaetzl, Dean; Sellers, Danny; Shaffer, Thomas; Shoemaker, David; Sigg, Daniel; Strunk, Amber; Sudhir, Vivishek; Sun, Ling; Tao, Duo; Taylor, Robert; Thomas, Michael; Thomas, Patrick; Thorne, Keith; Torrie, Calum; Traylor, Gary; Trudeau, Randy; Tse, Maggie; Vajente, Gabriele; Vass, Steve; Venugopalan, Gautam; Vitale, Salvatore; Vorvick, Cheryl; Wade, Andrew; Wallace, Larry; Warner, Jim; Weaver, Betsy; Weinstein, Alan; Weiss, Rainer; Whitcomb, Stan; Whittle, Chris; Willis, Joshua; Wipf, Christopher; Xiao, Sophia; Yamamoto, Hiro; Yu, Hang; Yu, Haocun; Zhang, Liyuan; Zucker, Michael; Zweizig, John
Comments: For the 2020 Astro decadal
Submitted: 2019-03-11
Recent gravitational-wave observations from the LIGO and Virgo observatories have brought a sense of great excitement to scientists and citizens the world over. Since September 2015,10 binary black hole coalescences and one binary neutron star coalescence have been observed. They have provided remarkable, revolutionary insight into the "gravitational Universe" and have greatly extended the field of multi-messenger astronomy. At present, Advanced LIGO can see binary black hole coalescences out to redshift 0.6 and binary neutron star coalescences to redshift 0.05. This probes only a very small fraction of the volume of the observable Universe. However, current technologies can be extended to construct "$3^\mathrm{rd}$ Generation" (3G) gravitational-wave observatories that would extend our reach to the very edge of the observable Universe. The event rates over such a large volume would be in the hundreds of thousands per year (i.e.tens per hour). Such 3G detectors would have a 10-fold improvement in strain sensitivity over the current generation of instruments, yielding signal-to-noise ratios of 1000 for events like those already seen. Several concepts are being studied for which engineering studies and reliable cost estimates will be developed in the next 5 years.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1705.06202  [pdf] - 1583532
Data Access for LIGO on the OSG
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, submitted to PEARC17
Submitted: 2017-05-17
During 2015 and 2016, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) conducted a three-month observing campaign. These observations delivered the first direct detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers. To search for these signals, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration uses the PyCBC search pipeline. To deliver science results in a timely manner, LIGO collaborated with the Open Science Grid (OSG) to distribute the required computation across a series of dedicated, opportunistic, and allocated resources. To deliver the petabytes necessary for such a large-scale computation, our team deployed a distributed data access infrastructure based on the XRootD server suite and the CernVM File System (CVMFS). This data access strategy grew from simply accessing remote storage to a POSIX-based interface underpinned by distributed, secure caches across the OSG.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.09303  [pdf] - 1391884
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Comments: 77 pages, 13 Figures; draft report, subject to further revision
Submitted: 2016-03-30, last modified: 2016-03-31
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on next-generation systems.