Normalized to: Bobik, P.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.03680 [pdf] - 1957409
Machine Learning Approach for Air Shower Recognition in EUSO-SPB Data
Submitted: 2019-09-09
The main goal of The Extreme Universe Space Observatory on a Super Pressure
Balloon (EUSO-SPB1) was to observe from above extensive air showers caused by
ultra-high energy cosmic rays. EUSO-SPB1 uses a fluorescence detector that
observes the atmosphere in a nadir observation mode from a near space altitude.
During the 12-day flight, an onboard first level trigger detected more than
\num{175000} candidate events. This paper presents an approach to recognize air
showers in this dataset. The approach uses a feature extraction method to
create a simpler representation of an event and then it uses established
machine learning techniques to classify data into at least two classes - shower
and noise. The machine learning models are trained on a set of air shower
simulations put on top of the background observed during the flight and a set
of events from the flight. We present the efficiency of the method on datasets
of simulated events. The flight data events are also used in unsupervised
learning methods to identify groups of events with similar features. The
presented methods allow us to shorten the candidate events list and, thanks to
the groups of similar events identified by the unsupervised methods, the
classification of the triggered events is made simpler.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.02557 [pdf] - 1730302
First observations of speed of light tracks by a fluorescence detector
looking down on the atmosphere
Abdellaoui, G.;
Abe, S.;
Adams, J. H.;
Ahriche, A.;
Allard, D.;
Allen, L.;
Alonso, G.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Anzalone, A.;
Arai, Y.;
Asano, K.;
Attallah, R.;
Attoui, H.;
Pernas, M. Ave;
Bacholle, S.;
Bakiri, M.;
Baragatti, P.;
Barrillon, P.;
Bartocci, S.;
Bayer, J.;
Beldjilali, B.;
Belenguer, T.;
Belkhalfa, N.;
Bellotti, R.;
Belov, A.;
Belov, K.;
Benmessai, K.;
Bertaina, M.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Biktemerova, S.;
Bisconti, F.;
Blanc, N.;
Błȩcki, J.;
Blin-Bondil, S.;
Bobik, P.;
Bogomilov, M.;
Bozzo, E.;
Bruno, A.;
Caballero, K. S.;
Cafagna, F.;
Campana, D.;
Capdevielle, J-N.;
Capel, F.;
Caramete, A.;
Caramete, L.;
Carlson, P.;
Caruso, R.;
Casolino, M.;
Cassardo, C.;
Castellina, A.;
Catalano, C. Catalano O.;
Cellino, A.;
Chikawa, M.;
Chiritoi, G.;
Christl, M. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Conti, L.;
Cordero, G.;
Cotto, G.;
Crawford, H. J.;
Cremonini, R.;
Csorna, S.;
Cummings, A.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
De Donato, C.;
de la Taille, C.;
De Santis, C.;
del Peral, L.;
Di Martino, M.;
Damian, A. Diaz;
Djemil, T.;
Dutan, I.;
Ebersoldt, A.;
Ebisuzaki, T.;
Engel, R.;
Eser, J.;
Fenu, F.;
Fernández-González, S.;
Fernández-Soriano, J.;
Ferrarese, S.;
Flamini, M.;
Fornaro, C.;
Fouka, M.;
Franceschi, A.;
Franchini, S.;
Fuglesang, C.;
Fujii, T.;
Fujimoto, J.;
Fukushima, M.;
Galeotti, P.;
García-Ortega, E.;
Garipov, G.;
Gascón, E.;
Genci, J.;
Giraudo, G.;
Alvarado, C. González;
Gorodetzky, P.;
Greg, R.;
Guarino, F.;
Guzmán, A.;
Hachisu, Y.;
Haiduc, M.;
Harlov, B.;
Haungs, A.;
Carretero, J. Hernández;
Cruz, W. Hidber;
Ikeda, D.;
Inoue, N.;
Inoue, S.;
Isgrò, F.;
Itow, Y.;
Jammer, T.;
Jeong, S.;
Joven, E.;
Judd, E. G.;
Jung, A.;
Jochum, J.;
Kajino, F.;
Kajino, T.;
Kalli, S.;
Kaneko, I.;
Karadzhov, Y.;
Karczmarczyk, J.;
Katahira, K.;
Kawai, K.;
Kawasaki, Y.;
Kedadra, A.;
Khales, H.;
Khrenov, B. A.;
Kim, Jeong-Sook;
Kim, Soon-Wook;
Kleifges, M.;
Klimov, P. A.;
Kolev, D.;
Krantz, H.;
Kreykenbohm, I.;
Kudela, K.;
Kurihara, Y.;
Kusenko, A.;
Kuznetsov, E.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lachaud, C.;
Lahmar, H.;
Lakhdari, F.;
Larson, R.;
Larsson, O.;
Lee, J.;
Licandro, J.;
Campano, L. López;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Mackovjak, S.;
Mahdi, M.;
Maravilla, D.;
Marcelli, L.;
Marcos, J. L.;
Marini, A.;
Marszał, W.;
Martens, K.;
Martín, Y.;
Martinez, O.;
Martucci, M.;
Masciantonio, G.;
Mase, K.;
Mastafa, M.;
Matev, R.;
Matthews, J. N.;
Mebarki, N.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mendoza, M. A.;
Menshikov, A.;
Merino, A.;
Meseguer, J.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mimouni, J.;
Miyamoto, H.;
Mizumoto, Y.;
Monaco, A.;
Ríos, J. A. Morales de los;
Nagataki, C. Moretto S.;
Naitamor, S.;
Napolitano, T.;
Naslund, W.;
Nava, R.;
Neronov, A.;
Nomoto, K.;
Nonaka, T.;
Ogawa, T.;
Ogio, S.;
Ohmori, H.;
Olinto, A. V.;
Orleański, P.;
Osteria, G.;
Pagliaro, A.;
Painter, W.;
Panasyuk, M. I.;
Panico, B.;
Pasqualino, G.;
Parizot, E.;
Park, I. H.;
Pastircak, B.;
Patzak, T.;
Paul, T.;
Pérez-Grande, I.;
Perfetto, F.;
Peter, T.;
Picozza, P.;
Pindado, S.;
Piotrowski, L. W.;
Piraino, S.;
Placidi, L.;
Plebaniak, Z.;
Pliego, S.;
Pollini, A.;
Polonski, Z.;
Popescu, E. M.;
Prat, P.;
Prévôt, G.;
Prieto, H.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Putis, M.;
Rabanal, J.;
Radu, A. A.;
Reyes, M.;
Rezazadeh, M.;
Ricci, M.;
Frías, M. D. Rodríguez;
Rodencal, M.;
Ronga, F.;
Roudil, G.;
Rusinov, I.;
Rybczyński, M.;
Sabau, M. D.;
Cano, G. Sáez;
Sagawa, H.;
Sahnoune, Z.;
Saito, A.;
Sakaki, N.;
Salazar, H.;
Balanzar, J. C. Sanchez;
Sánchez, J. L.;
Santangelo, A.;
Sanz-Andrés, A.;
Palomino, M. Sanz;
Saprykin, O.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sato, M.;
Schanz, T.;
Schieler, H.;
Scotti, V.;
Selmane, S.;
Semikoz, D.;
Serra, M.;
Sharakin, S.;
Shimizu, H. M.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shirahama, T.;
Spataro, B.;
Stan, I.;
Sugiyama, T.;
Supanitsky, D.;
Suzuki, M.;
Szabelska, B.;
Szabelski, J.;
Tajima, N.;
Tajima, T.;
Takahashi, Y.;
Takami, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Takizawa, Y.;
Talai, M. C.;
Tenzer, C.;
Thomas, S. B.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tkachev, L.;
Tokuno, H.;
Tomida, T.;
Tone, N.;
Toscano, S.;
Traïche, M.;
Tsenov, R.;
Tsunesada, Y.;
Tsuno, K.;
Tubbs, J.;
Turriziani, S.;
Uchihori, Y.;
Vaduvescu, O.;
Valdés-Galicia, J. F.;
Vallania, P.;
Vankova, G.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Vlcek, B.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Vrabel, M.;
Wada, S.;
Watanabe, J.;
Watts, J.;
Weber, M.;
Muñoz, R. Weigand;
Weindl, A.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wille, M.;
Wilms, J.;
Włodarczyk, Z.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yang, J.;
Yano, H.;
Yashin, I. V.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Young, R.;
Zgura, I. S;
Zotov, M. Yu.;
Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Submitted: 2018-08-07
EUSO-Balloon is a pathfinder mission for the Extreme Universe Space
Observatory onboard the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM-EUSO). It was launched
on the moonless night of the 25$^{th}$ of August 2014 from Timmins, Canada. The
flight ended successfully after maintaining the target altitude of 38 km for
five hours. One part of the mission was a 2.5 hour underflight using a
helicopter equipped with three UV light sources (LED, xenon flasher and laser)
to perform an inflight calibration and examine the detectors capability to
measure tracks moving at the speed of light. We describe the helicopter laser
system and details of the underflight as well as how the laser tracks were
recorded and found in the data. These are the first recorded laser tracks
measured from a fluorescence detector looking down on the atmosphere. Finally,
we present a first reconstruction of the direction of the laser tracks relative
to the detector.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.04548 [pdf] - 1583378
An analytically iterative method for solving problems of cosmic-ray
modulation
Submitted: 2017-05-12, last modified: 2017-07-02
The development of an analytically iterative method for solving steady-state
as well as unsteady-state problems of cosmic-ray (CR) modulation is proposed.
Iterations for obtaining the solutions are constructed for the spherically
symmetric form of the CR propagation equation. The main solution of the
considered problem consists of the zero-order solution that is obtained during
the initial iteration and amendments that may be obtained by subsequent
iterations. The finding of the zero-order solution is based on the CR isotropy
during propagation in the space, whereas the anisotropy is taken into account
when finding the next amendments. To begin with, the method is applied to solve
the problem of CR modulation where the diffusion coefficient $\kappa$ and the
solar wind speed $u$ are constants with an Local Interstellar Spectra (LIS)
spectrum. The solution obtained with two iterations was compared with an
analytical solution and with numerical solutions. Finally, solutions that have
only one iteration for two problems of CR modulation with $u = constant$ and
the same form of LIS spectrum were obtained and tested against numerical
solutions. For the first problem, $\kappa$ is proportional to the momentum of
the particle $p$, so it has the form $\kappa=k_0\eta$, where
$\eta=\frac{p}{m_0c}$. For the second problem, the diffusion coefficient is
given in the form $\kappa=k_0\beta\eta$, where $\beta=\frac{v}{c}$ is the
particle speed relative to the speed of light. There was a good matching of the
obtained solutions with the numerical solutions as well as with the analytical
solution for the problem where $\kappa = constant$.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.00541 [pdf] - 1303305
Cosmic Rays Propagation with HelMod: Difference between forward-in-time
and backward-in-time approaches
Della Torre, S.;
Bobik, P.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
La Vacca, G.;
Pensotti, S.;
Putis, M.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Rozza, D.;
Tacconi, M.;
Zannoni, M.
Submitted: 2015-08-13
The cosmic rays modulation inside the heliosphere is well described by a
transport equation introduced by Parker in 1965. To solve this equation several
approaches were followed in the past. Recently the Monte Carlo approach becomes
widely used in force of his advantages with respect to other numerical methods.
In the Monte Carlo approach, the transport equation is associated to a fully
equivalent set of Stochastic Differential Equations. This set is used to
describe the stochastic path of a quasi-particle from a source, e.g., the
interstellar medium, to a specific target, e.g., a detector at Earth. In this
work, we present both the Forward-in-Time and Backward-in-Time Monte Carlo
solutions. We present an implementation of both algorithms in the framework of
HelMod Code showing that the difference between the two approach is below 5\%
that can be quoted as the systematic uncertain of the Method itself.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.5195 [pdf] - 695676
Suprathermal particle addition to solar wind pressure: possible
influence on magnetospheric transmissivity of low energy cosmic rays?
Bobik, P.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Consolandi, C.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
Kudela, K.;
La Vacca, G.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Pensotti, S.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Rozza, D.;
Tacconi, M.
Submitted: 2013-07-19
Energetic (suprathermal) solar particles, accelerated in the interplanetary
medium, contribute to the solar wind pressure, in particular during high solar
activity periods. We estimated the effect of the increase of solar wind
pressure due to suprathermal particles on magnetospheric transmissivity of
galactic cosmic rays in the case of one recent solar event.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.5196 [pdf] - 695677
GeoMag and HelMod webmodels version for magnetosphere and heliosphere
transport of cosmic rays
Bobik, P.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Consolandi, C.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
Kudela, K.;
La Vacca, G.;
Pensotti, S.;
Putis, M.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Rozza, D.;
Tacconi, M.
Submitted: 2013-07-19
We implemented a website to deal with main effects on Cosmic Ray access to
the Earth, i.e. the Solar Modulation and the Geomagnetic Field effect. In
helmod.org the end user can easily access a web interface to results catalog of
the HelMod Monte Carlo Code. This Model uses a Monte Carlo Approach to solves
the Parker Transport Equation, obtaining a modulated proton flux for a period
(monthly average) between January 1990 and december 2007. geomagsphere.org is
instead based on GeoMag Backtracing Code, that solves the Lorentz equation with
a Runge-Kutta method of 6th order, and, reversing charge sign and velocity,
reconstruct particle trajectories in the Earth Magnetosphere back in time. We
use last models of internal (IGRF-11) and external (Tsyganenko 1996 -T96- and
2005 -T05-) field components valid up to 2015. Particles are backtraced to the
outer (magnetopause) or inner boundary to separate Primary (allowed trajectory)
from Secondary (forbidden) Cosmic Rays. This code has been used both for
reproducing known effects as East-West effect and rigidity cutoff calculations.
In geomagsphere.org the user can choose the external field model from
Tsyganenko (T96 or T05) and obtain for a fixed position and date from 1st Jan.
1968 (T96) and 1st Jan. 1995 (T05) respectively till 31$^{st}$ Dec 2012, the
vertical rigidity cutoff estimation obtained with the backtracing technique
with a rigidity step of 0.1 GV. For a more precise calculation (0.01 GV),
requiring more CPU time, results are sent to the user by email (mail model)
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.5199 [pdf] - 695679
Cosmic Ray Modulation studied with HelMod Monte Carlo tool and
comparison with Ulysses Fast Scan Data during consecutive Solar Minima
Bobik, P.;
Boella, G.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
La Vacca, G.;
Kudela, K.;
Pensotti, S.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Rozza, D.;
Tacconi, M.
Submitted: 2013-07-19
The Cosmic Rays propagation was studied in details using the HelMod-2D Monte
Carlo code, that includes a general description of the diffusion tensor, and
polar magnetic-field. The Numerical Approach used in this work is based on a
set of Stochastic Differential Equations fully equivalent to the well know
Parker Equation for the transport of Cosmic Rays. In our approach the Diffusion
tensor in the frame of the magnetic field turbolence does not depends
explicitly by Solar Latitude but varies with time using a diffusion parameter
obtained by Neutron Monitors. The parameters of the Model were tuned using data
during the solar Cycle 23 and Ulysses latitudinal Fast Scan in 1995. The actual
parametrization is able to well reproduce the observed latitudinal gradient of
protons and the southward shift of the minimum of latitudinal intensity. The
description of the model is also available online at website www.helmod.org.
The model was then applied on Pamela/Ulysses proton intensity from 2006 up to
2009. The model during this 4-year continous period agree well with both PAMELA
(at 1 AU) and Ulysses data (at various solar distance and solar latitude). The
agreement improves when considering the ratio between this data. Studies done
also with particles with different charge (e.g. electrons) allow us to explain
the presence (or not) of protons and electrons latitudinal gradients observed
by Ulysses during the Latitudinal Fast Scan in 1995 and 2007.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.2478 [pdf] - 662659
An evaluation of the exposure in nadir observation of the JEM-EUSO
mission
Adams, J. H.;
Ahmad, S.;
Albert, J. -N.;
Allard, D.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Anzalone, A.;
Arai, Y.;
Aramo, C.;
Asano, K.;
Ave, M.;
Barrillon, P.;
Batsch, T.;
Bayer, J.;
Belenguer, T.;
Bellotti, R.;
Berlind, A. A.;
Bertaina, M.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Biktemerova, S.;
Blaksley, C.;
Blecki, J.;
Blin-Bondil, S.;
Bluemer, J.;
Bobik, P.;
Bogomilov, M.;
Bonamente, M.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Briz, S.;
Bruno, A.;
Cafagna, F.;
Campana, D.;
Capdevielle, J-N.;
Caruso, R.;
Casolino, M.;
Cassardo, C.;
Castellini, G.;
Catalano, O.;
Cellino, A.;
Chikawa, M.;
Christl, M. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Cortes, J. F.;
Crawford, H. J.;
Cremonini, R.;
Csorna, S.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dagoret-Campagne, S.;
de Castro, A. J.;
De Donato, C.;
de la Taille, C.;
del Peral, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
De Pascale, M. P.;
Di Martino, M.;
Distratis, G.;
Dupieux, M.;
Ebersoldt, A.;
Ebisuzaki, T.;
Engel, R.;
Falk, S.;
Fang, K.;
Fenu, F.;
Fernandez-Gomez, I.;
Ferrarese, S.;
Franceschi, A.;
Fujimoto, J.;
Galeotti, P.;
Garipov, G.;
Geary, J.;
Giaccari, U. G.;
Giraudo, G.;
Gonchar, M.;
Alvarado, C. Gonzalez;
Gorodetzky, P.;
Guarino, F.;
Guzman, A.;
Hachisu, Y.;
Harlov, B.;
Haungs, A.;
Carretero, J. Hernandez;
Higashide, K.;
Iguchi, T.;
Ikeda, H.;
Inoue, N.;
Inoue, S.;
Insolia, A.;
Isgrio, F.;
Itow, Y.;
Joven, E.;
Judd, E. G.;
Jung, A.;
Kajino, F.;
Kajino, T.;
Kaneko, I.;
Karadzhov, Y.;
Karczmarczyk, J.;
Katahira, K.;
Kawai, K.;
Kawasaki, Y.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Khrenov, B. A.;
Kim, Jeong-Sook;
Kim, Soon-Wook;
Kim, Sug-Whan;
Kleifges, M.;
Klimov, P. A.;
Ko, S. H.;
Kolev, D.;
Kreykenbohm, I.;
Kudela, K.;
Kurihara, Y.;
Kuznetsov, E.;
La Rosa, G.;
Lee, J.;
Licandro, J.;
Lim, H.;
Lopez, F.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Mannheim, K.;
Marcelli, L.;
Marini, A.;
Martin-Chassard, G.;
Martinez, O.;
Masciantonio, G.;
Mase, K.;
Matev, R.;
Maurissen, A.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mernik, T.;
Miyamoto, H.;
Miyazaki, Y.;
Mizumoto, Y.;
Modestino, G.;
Monnier-Ragaigne, D.;
Rios, J. A. Morales de los;
Mot, B.;
Murakami, T.;
Nagano, M.;
Nagata, M.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nakamura, T.;
Nam, J. W.;
Nam, S.;
Nam, K.;
Napolitano, T.;
Naumov, D.;
Neronov, A.;
Nomoto, K.;
Ogawa, T.;
Ohmori, H.;
Olinto, A. V.;
Orleanski, P.;
Osteria, G.;
Pacheco, N.;
Panasyuk, M. I.;
Parizot, E.;
Park, I. H.;
Pastircak, B.;
Patzak, T.;
Paul, T.;
Pennypacker, C.;
Peter, T.;
Picozza, P.;
Pollini, A.;
Prieto, H.;
Reardon, P.;
Reina, M.;
Reyes, M.;
Ricci, M.;
Rodriguez, I.;
Frias, M. D. Rodriguez;
Ronga, F.;
Rothkaehl, H.;
Roudil, G.;
Rusinov, I.;
Rybczynski, M.;
Sabau, M. D.;
Cano, G. Saez;
Saito, A.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sakata, M.;
Salazar, H.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santangelo, A.;
Cruz, L. Santiago;
Palomino, M. Sanz;
Saprykin, O.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sato, H.;
Sato, M.;
Schanz, T.;
Schieler, H.;
Scotti, V.;
Scuderi, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Selmane, S.;
Semikoz, D.;
Serra, M.;
Sharakin, S.;
Shibata, T.;
Shimizu, H. M.;
Shinozaki, K.;
Shirahama, T.;
Siemieniec-Ozieb, G.;
Lopez, H. H. Silva;
Sledd, J.;
Slominska, K.;
Sobey, A.;
Sugiyama, T.;
Supanitsky, D.;
Suzuki, M.;
Szabelska, B.;
Szabelski, J.;
Tajima, F.;
Tajima, N.;
Tajima, T.;
Takahashi, Y.;
Takami, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Takizawa, Y.;
Tenzer, C.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tkachev, L.;
Tomida, T.;
Tone, N.;
Trillaud, F.;
Tsenov, R.;
Tsuno, K.;
Tymieniecka, T.;
Uchihori, Y.;
Vaduvescu, O.;
Valdes-Galicia, J. F.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
Vankova, G.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villasenor, L.;
von Ballmoos, P.;
Wada, S.;
Watanabe, J.;
Watanabe, S.;
Watts, J.;
Weber, M.;
Weiler, T. J.;
Wibig, T.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wille, M.;
Wilms, J.;
Wlodarczyk, Z.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamamoto, Y.;
Yang, J.;
Yano, H.;
Yashin, I. V.;
Yonetoku, D.;
Yoshida, K.;
Yoshida, S.;
Young, R.;
Zamora, A.;
Marchi, A. Zuccaro
Submitted: 2013-05-11
We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme
Universe Space Observatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the
International Space Station. Designed as a mission to explore the extreme
energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth's nighttime
atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive
air showers initiated by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we
discuss the particularities of space-based observation and we compute the
annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the
expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the
investigations of the effects of clouds and different types of background
light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of magnitude higher
than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.1559 [pdf] - 1158357
Latitudinal Dependence of Cosmic Rays Modulation at 1 AU and
Interplanetary-Magnetic-Field Polar Correction
Bobik, P.;
Boella, G.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Consolandi, C.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
Kudela, K.;
Pensotti, S.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Rozza, D.;
Tacconi, M.
Submitted: 2012-12-07, last modified: 2012-12-10
The cosmic rays differential intensity inside the heliosphere, for energy
below 30 GeV/nuc, depends on solar activity and interplanetary magnetic field
polarity. This variation, termed solar modulation, is described using a 2-D
(radius and colatitude) Monte Carlo approach for solving the Parker transport
equation that includes diffusion, convection, magnetic drift and adiabatic
energy loss. Since the whole transport is strongly related to the
interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) structure, a better understanding of his
description is needed in order to reproduce the cosmic rays intensity at the
Earth, as well as outside the ecliptic plane. In this work an interplanetary
magnetic field model including the standard description on ecliptic region and
a polar correction is presented. This treatment of the IMF, implemented in the
HelMod Monte Carlo code (version 2.0), was used to determine the effects on the
differential intensity of Proton at 1\,AU and allowed one to investigate how
latitudinal gradients of proton intensities, observed in the inner heliosphere
with the Ulysses spacecraft during 1995, can be affected by the modification of
the IMF in the polar regions.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.5730 [pdf] - 1579394
Heliosphere Dimension and Cosmic Ray Modulation
Bobik, P.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Consolandi, C.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
Kudela, K.;
Noventa, F.;
Pensotti, S.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Rozza, D.
Submitted: 2011-12-24
The differential intensities of Cosmic Rays at Earth were calculated using a
2D stochastic Montecarlo diffusion code and compared with observation data. We
evaluated the effect of stretched and compressed heliospheres on the Cosmic Ray
intensities at the Earth. This was studied introducing a dependence of the
diffusion parameter on the heliospherical size. Then, we found that the optimum
value of the heliospherical radius better accounting for experimental data. We
also found that the obtained values depends on solar activity. Our results are
compatible with Voyager observations and with models of heliospherical size
modulation.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.4315 [pdf] - 461594
Systematic Investigation of Solar Modulation of Galactic Protons for
Solar Cycle 23 using a Monte Carlo Approach with Particle Drift Effects and
Latitudinal Dependence
Bobik, P.;
Boella, G.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Consolandi, C.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
Kudela, K.;
Pensotti, S.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Tacconi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-19
A propagation model of galactic cosmic protons through the Heliosphere was
implemented using a 2-D Monte Carlo approach to determine the differential
intensities of protons during the solar cycle 23. The model includes the
effects due to the variation of solar activity during the propagation of cosmic
rays from the boundary of the heliopause down to Earth's position. Drift
effects are also accounted for. The simulated spectra were found in agreement
with those obtained with experimental observations carried out by BESS, AMS and
PAMELA collaborations. In addition, the modulated spectrum determined with the
present code for the year 1995 exhibits the latitudinal gradient and equatorial
southward offset minimum found by Ulysses fast scan in 1995.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.0938 [pdf] - 1579349
Proton Modulation in the Heliosphere for Different Solar Conditions and
Prediction for AMS-02
Bobik, P.;
Boella, G.;
Boschini, M. J.;
Consolandi, C.;
Della Torre, S.;
Gervasi, M.;
Grandi, D.;
Kudela, K.;
Memola, E.;
Pensotti, S.;
Rancoita, P. G.;
Tacconi, M.
Submitted: 2010-12-04, last modified: 2011-03-17
Spectra of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) measured at the Earth are the
combination of several processes: sources production and acceleration,
propagation in the interstellar medium and propagation in the heliosphere.
Inside the solar cavity the flux of GCRs is reduced due to the solar
modulation, the interaction which they have with the interplanetary medium. We
realized a 2D stochastic simulation of solar modulation to reproduce CR spectra
at the Earth, and evaluated the importance in our results of the Local
Interstellar Spectrum (LIS) model and its agreement with data at high energy.
We show a good agreement between our model and the data taken by AMS-01 and
BESS experiments during periods with different solar activity conditions.
Furthermore we made a prediction for the flux which will be measured by AMS-02
experiment.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.0215 [pdf] - 1051811
Antiproton modulation in the Heliosphere and AMS-02 antiproton over
proton ratio prediction
Submitted: 2011-02-01
We implemented a quasi time-dependent 2D stochastic model of solar modulation
describing the transport of cosmic rays (CR) in the heliosphere. Our code can
modulate the Local Interstellar Spectrum (LIS) of a generic charged particle
(light cosmic ions and electrons), calculating the spectrum at 1AU. Several
measurements of CR antiparticles have been performed. Here we focused our
attention on the CR antiproton component and the antiproton over proton ratio.
We show that our model, using the same heliospheric parameters for both
particles, fit the observed anti-p/p ratio. We show a good agreement with
BESS-97 and PAMELA data and make a prediction for the AMS-02 experiment.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.3086 [pdf] - 1579353
Proton and antiproton modulation in the heliosphere for different solar
conditions and AMS-02 measurements prediction
Submitted: 2010-12-14, last modified: 2010-12-22
Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) are mainly protons confined in the galactic
magnetic field to form an isotropic flux inside the galaxy. Before reaching the
Earth orbit they enter the Heliosphere and undergo diffusion, convection,
magnetic drift and adiabatic energy loss. The result is a reduction of
particles flux at low energy (below 10 GeV), called solar modulation. We
realized a quasi time-dependent 2D Stochastic Simulation of Solar Modulation
that is able to reproduce CR spectra once known the Local Interstellar Spectrum
(LIS). We were able to estimate the different behaviors associated to the
polarity dependence of the Heliospheric modulation for particles as well as for
antiparticles. We show a good agreement with the antiproton/proton ratio
measured by AMS-01, Pamela, BESS, Heat and Caprice and we performed a
prediction for the AMS-02 Experiment.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4843 [pdf] - 1579343
Electron and Positron solar modulation and prediction for AMS-02
Submitted: 2010-11-22, last modified: 2010-12-19
The solar modulation, a combination of diffusion, convection, magnetic drift
and energy loss inside the heliosphere is usually seen as a depletion in the
Galactic cosmic ray (CR) flux at low energy (less than 10 GeV/nuc).
Antiparticles such as antiprotons or positrons undergo the same processes of
respective particles but with a different magnitude depending on the Solar
magnetic field polarity. For electrons and positrons, due to the small mass,
energy loss mechanisms as inverse compton, synchrotron, bremsstrahlung and
ionization have to be taken into account, together with the typical adiabatic
losses considered in the heliosphere. We developed a Monte Carlo stochastic
simulation with the aim to compare the solar modulation of particles and
antiparticles in the same observation period. We are able to estimate the
different behaviours associated to the charge sign dependent processes of the
heliospheric modulation. We compared the simulated positron fraction with
measurements performed by AMS-01 and PAMELA. We also present the prediction for
the AMS-02 experiment.