Normalized to: Blanloeil, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.5845 [pdf] - 968247
Topological implications of inhomogeneity
Submitted: 2012-01-27, last modified: 2013-01-18
The approximate homogeneity of spatial sections of the Universe is well
supported observationally, but the inhomogeneity of the spatial sections is
even better supported. Here, we consider the implications of inhomogeneity in
dust models for the connectedness of spatial sections at early times. We
consider a non-global Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) model designed to match
observations, a more general, heuristic model motivated by the former, and two
specific, global LTB models. We propose that the generic class of solutions of
the Einstein equations projected back in time from the spatial section at the
present epoch includes subclasses in which the spatial section evolves (with
increasing time) smoothly (i) from being disconnected to being connected, or
(ii) from being simply connected to being multiply connected, where the
coordinate system is comoving and synchronous. We show that (i) and (ii) each
contain at least one exact solution. These subclasses exist because the
Einstein equations allow non-simultaneous big bang times. The two types of
topology evolution occur over time slices that include significantly
post-quantum epochs if the bang time varies by much more than a Planck time. In
this sense, it is possible for cosmic topology evolution to be "mostly"
classical.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.2300 [pdf] - 951117
A measure on the set of compact Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker
models
Submitted: 2009-12-11, last modified: 2010-09-28
Compact, flat Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) models have recently
regained interest as a good fit to the observed cosmic microwave background
temperature fluctuations. However, it is generally thought that a globally,
exactly-flat FLRW model is theoretically improbable. Here, in order to obtain a
probability space on the set F of compact, comoving, 3-spatial sections of FLRW
models, a physically motivated hypothesis is proposed, using the density
parameter Omega as a derived rather than fundamental parameter. We assume that
the processes that select the 3-manifold also select a global mass-energy and a
Hubble parameter. The inferred range in Omega consists of a single real value
for any 3-manifold. Thus, the obvious measure over F is the discrete measure.
Hence, if the global mass-energy and Hubble parameter are a function of
3-manifold choice among compact FLRW models, then probability spaces
parametrised by Omega do not, in general, give a zero probability of a flat
model. Alternatively, parametrisation by the injectivity radius r_inj ("size")
suggests the Lebesgue measure. In this case, the probability space over the
injectivity radius implies that flat models occur almost surely (a.s.), in the
sense of probability theory, and non-flat models a.s. do not occur.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.0975 [pdf] - 23124
Dark energy as a spatial continuity condition
Submitted: 2009-04-06, last modified: 2009-12-02
Observational evidence of dark energy that makes the Universe nearly flat at
the present epoch is very strong. We study the link between spatial continuity
and dark energy. We assume that comoving space is a compact 3-manifold of
constant curvature, described by a homogeneous
Friedman-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker metric. We assume that spatial continuity
cannot be violated, i.e. that the global topology of the comoving section of
the Universe cannot change during post-quantum epochs. We find that if the
Universe was flat and compact during early epochs, then the presently low
values of the radiation and matter densities imply that dark energy was created
as a spatial continuity effect. Moreover, if the Universe is compact, then
Omega_tot=1 is dynamically stable, where Omega_tot is the total density
parameter in units of the critical density. Dark energy was observationally
detected as a geometrical phenomenon. It is difficult to imagine a simpler
explanation for dark energy than spatial continuity, finiteness and
homogeneity.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0010170 [pdf] - 38517
Cosmological Topology in Paris 1998
Submitted: 2000-10-09
Quel est, ou pourrait \^etre, la topologie globale de la partie spatiale de
l'Univers ? L'Univers entier (pr\'ecis\'ement, l'hypersurface spatiale de
celui-ci) est-il observable ? Les math\'ematiciens, les physiciens et les
cosmologistes observationnels ont des approches diff\'erentes pour aborder ces
questions qui restent ouvertes.
What is, or could be, the global topology of spatial sections of the
Universe? Is the entire Universe (spatial hypersurface thereof) observable ?
Mathematicians, physicists and observational cosmologists have different
strategies to approaching these questions which are not yet fully answered.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802083 [pdf] - 345109
Three-dimensional Topology-Independent Methods to Look for Global
Topology
Submitted: 1998-02-06, last modified: 1998-05-30
The space-like hypersurface of the Universe at the present cosmological time
is a three-dimensional manifold. A non-trivial global topology of this
space-like hypersurface would imply that the apparently observable universe
(the sphere of particle horizon radius) could contain several images of the
single, physical Universe. Recent three-dimensional techniques for constraining
and/or detecting this topology are reviewed. Initial applications of these
techniques using X-ray bright clusters of galaxies and quasars imply (weak)
candidates for a non-trivial topology.