Normalized to: Biryukov, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.4139 [pdf] - 1209585
GRB 051008: A long, spectrally-hard dust-obscured GRB in a Lyman-Break
Galaxy at z ~ 2.8
Volnova, A. A.;
Pozanenko, A. S.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Perley, D. A.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Kann, D. A.;
Rumyantsev, V. V.;
Biryukov, V. V.;
Burkhonov, O.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Ferrero, P.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Klose, S.;
Loznikov, V. M.;
Minaev, P. Yu.;
Stecklum, B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Ulanov, M. V.
Submitted: 2014-05-16
We present observations of the dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 051008 provided by
Swift/BAT, Swift/XRT, Konus-WIND, INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS in the high-energy domain
and the Shajn, Swift/UVOT, Tautenburg, NOT, Gemini and Keck I telescopes in the
optical and near-infrared bands. The burst was detected only in gamma- and
X-rays and neither a prompt optical nor a radio afterglow were detected down to
deep limits. We identified the host galaxy of the burst, which is a typical
Lyman-break Galaxy (LBG) with R-magnitude of 24.06 +/- 0.10. A redshift of the
galaxy of z = 2.77 (-0.20,+0.15) is measured photometrically due to the
presence of a clear, strong Lyman-break feature. The host galaxy is a small
starburst galaxy with moderate intrinsic extinction (A_V = 0.3 mag) and has a
SFR of ~ 60 M_Sun / yr typical for LBGs. It is one of the few cases where a GRB
host has been found to be a classical Lyman-break galaxy. Using the redshift we
estimate the isotropic-equivalent radiated energy of the burst to be E_iso =
(1.15 +/- 0.20) x 10^54 erg. We also provide evidence in favour of the
hypothesis that the darkness of GRB 051008 is due to local absorption resulting
from a dense circumburst medium.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.2186 [pdf] - 1381036
The Afterglows of Swift-era Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. Comparing pre-Swift and
Swift era Long/Soft (Type II) GRB Optical Afterglows
Kann, D. A.;
Klose, S.;
Zhang, B.;
Malesani, D.;
Nakar, E.;
Pozanenko, A.;
Wilson, A. C.;
Butler, N. R.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Schulze, S.;
Andreev, M.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Bikmaev, I. F.;
Biryukov, V.;
Böttcher, M.;
Burenin, R. A.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chincarini, G.;
Cobb, B. E.;
Covino, S.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Elia, V.;
Della Valle, M.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Efimov, Yu.;
Ferrero, P.;
Fugazza, D.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Gålfalk, M.;
Grundahl, F.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Gupta, S.;
Guziy, S.;
Hafizov, B.;
Hjorth, J.;
Holhjem, K.;
Ibrahimov, M.;
Im, M.;
Israel, G. L.;
Jeĺinek, M.;
Jensen, B. L.;
Karimov, R.;
Khamitov, I. M.;
Kızıloǧlu, Ü.;
Klunko, E.;
Kubánek, P.;
Kutyrev, A. S.;
Laursen, P.;
Levan, A. J.;
Mannucci, F.;
Martin, C. M.;
Mescheryakov, A.;
Mirabal, N.;
Norris, J. P.;
Ovaldsen, J. -E.;
Paraficz, D.;
Pavlenko, E.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Rossi, A.;
Rumyantsev, V.;
Salinas, R.;
Sergeev, A.;
Sharapov, D.;
Sollerman, J.;
Stecklum, B.;
Stella, L.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Telting, J.;
Testa, V.;
Updike, A. C.;
Volnova, A.;
Watson, D.;
Wiersema, K.;
Xu, D.
Submitted: 2007-12-13, last modified: 2010-07-16
We have gathered optical photometry data from the literature on a large
sample of Swift-era gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows including GRBs up to
September 2009, for a total of 76 GRBs, and present an additional three
pre-Swift GRBs not included in an earlier sample. Furthermore, we publish 840
additional new photometry data points on a total of 42 GRB afterglows,
including large data sets for GRBs 050319, 050408, 050802, 050820A, 050922C,
060418, 080413A and 080810. We analyzed the light curves of all GRBs in the
sample and derived spectral energy distributions for the sample with the best
data quality, allowing us to estimate the host galaxy extinction. We
transformed the afterglow light curves into an extinction-corrected z=1 system
and compared their luminosities with a sample of pre-Swift afterglows. The
results of a former study, which showed that GRB afterglows clustered and
exhibited a bimodal distribution in luminosity space, is weakened by the larger
sample. We found that the luminosity distribution of the two afterglow samples
(Swift-era and pre-Swift) are very similar, and that a subsample for which we
were not able to estimate the extinction, which is fainter than the main
sample, can be explained by assuming a moderate amount of line-of-sight host
extinction. We derived bolometric isotropic energies for all GRBs in our
sample, and found only a tentative correlation between the prompt energy
release and the optical afterglow luminosity at one day after the GRB in the
z=1 system. A comparative study of the optical luminosities of GRB afterglows
with echelle spectra (which show a high number of foreground absorbing systems)
and those without reveals no indication that the former are statistically
significantly more luminous. (abridged)
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.0087 [pdf] - 1002760
A multiwavelength study of Swift GRB 060111B constraining the origin of
its prompt optical emission
Stratta, G.;
Pozanenko, A.;
Atteia, J-L.;
Klotz, A.;
Basa, S.;
Gendre, B.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Boër, M.;
Cutini, S.;
Henze, M.;
Holland, S.;
Ibrahimov, M.;
Ienna, F.;
Khamitov, I.;
Klose, S.;
Rumyantsev, V.;
Biryukov, V.;
Sharapov, D.;
Vachier, F.;
Arnouts, S.;
Perley, D. A.
Submitted: 2009-07-01
In this work, we present the results obtained from a multi-wavelength
campaign, as well as from the public Swift/BAT, XRT, and UVOT data of GRB
060111B for which a bright optical emission was measured with good temporal
resolution during the prompt phase. We identified the host galaxy at R~25 mag;
its featureless spectral continuum and brightness, as well as the non-detection
of any associated supernova 16 days after the trigger and other independent
redshift estimates, converge to z~1-2. From the analysis of the early afterglow
SED, we find that non-negligible host galaxy dust extinction, in addition to
the Galactic one, affects the observed flux in the optical regime. The
extinction-corrected optical-to-gamma-ray spectral energy distribution during
the prompt emission shows a flux density ratio $F_{\gamma}/F_{opt}$=0.01-0.0001
with spectral index $\beta_{\gamma,opt}> \beta_{\gamma}$, strongly suggesting a
separate origin of the optical and gamma-ray components. This result is
supported by the lack of correlated behavior in the prompt emission light
curves observed in the two energy domains. The properties of the prompt optical
emission observed during GRB 060111B favor interpretation of this optical light
as radiation from the reverse shock in a thick shell limit and in the slow
cooling regime. The expected peak flux is consistent with the observed one
corrected for the host extinction, likely indicating that the starting time of
the TAROT observations is very near to or coincident with the peak time. The
estimated fireball initial Lorentz factor is >260-360 at z=1-2, similar to the
Lorentz factors obtained from other GRBs. GRB 060111B is a rare, good test case
of the reverse shock emission mechanism in both the X-ray and optical energy
ranges.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510008 [pdf] - 1468931
GRB 050117: Simultaneous Gamma-ray and X-ray Observations with the Swift
Satellite
Hill, J. E.;
Morris, D. C.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sato, G.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Angelini, L.;
Pagani, C.;
Moretti, A.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Biryukov, V. V.;
Campana, S.;
Capalbi, M.;
Cusumano, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Ibrahimov, M. A.;
Kennea, J.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Ioka, K.;
Markwardt, C.;
Meszaros, P.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Pozanenko, A. S.;
Perri, M.;
Rumyantsev, V. V.;
Shady, P.;
Sharapov, D. A.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Zhang, B.;
Chincarini, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Wells, A.;
Nousek, J. A.
Submitted: 2005-09-30
The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Explorer performed its first autonomous, X-ray
follow-up to a newly detected GRB on 2005 January 17, within 193 seconds of the
burst trigger by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope. While the burst was still in
progress, the X-ray Telescope obtained a position and an image for an
un-catalogued X-ray source; simultaneous with the gamma-ray observation. The
XRT observed flux during the prompt emission was 1.1 x 10^{-8} ergs cm^{-2}
s^{-1} in the 0.5-10 keV energy band. The emission in the X-ray band decreased
by three orders of magnitude within 700 seconds, following the prompt emission.
This is found to be consistent with the gamma-ray decay when extrapolated into
the XRT energy band. During the following 6.3 hours, the XRT observed the
afterglow in an automated sequence for an additional 947 seconds, until the
burst became fully obscured by the Earth limb. A faint, extremely slowly
decaying afterglow, alpha=-0.21$, was detected. Finally, a break in the
lightcurve occurred and the flux decayed with alpha<-1.2$. The X-ray position
triggered many follow-up observations: no optical afterglow could be confirmed,
although a candidate was identified 3 arcsecs from the XRT position.