Normalized to: Biesiadzinski, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.11141 [pdf] - 2070172
An Effective Field Theory Analysis of the First LUX Dark Matter Search
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2020-03-24
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter search was a 250-kg active mass
dual-phase time projection chamber that operated by detecting light and
ionization signals from particles incident on a xenon target. In December 2015,
LUX reported a minimum 90% upper C.L. of 6e-46 cm^2 on the spin-independent
WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering cross section based on a 1.4e4 kg*day exposure
in its first science run. Tension between experiments and the absence of a
definitive positive detection suggest it would be prudent to search for WIMPs
outside the standard spin-independent/spin-dependent paradigm. Recent
theoretical work has identified a complete basis of 14 independent effective
field theory (EFT) operators to describe WIMP-nucleon interactions. In addition
to spin-independent and spin-dependent nuclear responses, these operators can
produce novel responses such as angular-momentum-dependent and spin-orbit
couplings. Here we report on a search for all 14 of these EFT couplings with
data from LUX's first science run. Limits are placed on each coupling as a
function of WIMP mass.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06272 [pdf] - 2050176
Extending light WIMP searches to single scintillation photons in LUX
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Grace, E.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazka, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Levy, C.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
López-Paredes, B.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2019-07-14, last modified: 2019-12-27
We present a novel analysis technique for liquid xenon time projection
chambers that allows for a lower threshold by relying on events with a prompt
scintillation signal consisting of single detected photons. The energy
threshold of the LUX dark matter experiment is primarily determined by the
smallest scintillation response detectable, which previously required a 2-fold
coincidence signal in its photomultiplier arrays, enforced in data analysis.
The technique presented here exploits the double photoelectron emission effect
observed in some photomultiplier models at vacuum ultraviolet wavelengths. We
demonstrate this analysis using an electron recoil calibration dataset and
place new constraints on the spin-independent scattering cross section of
weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) down to 2.5 GeV/c$^2$ WIMP mass
using the 2013 LUX dataset. This new technique is promising to enhance light
WIMP and astrophysical neutrino searches in next-generation liquid xenon
experiments.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.06039 [pdf] - 2061504
Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) dark matter experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Alsum, S. K.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Arthurs, M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Balashov, S.;
Bauer, D.;
Belle, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Benson, T.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boast, K. E.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V. V.;
Burdin, S.;
Busenitz, J. K.;
Carels, C.;
Carlsmith, D. L.;
Carlson, B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cherwinka, J. J.;
Cole, A.;
Cottle, A.;
Craddock, W. W.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Dahl, C. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edberg, T. K.;
Edwards, W. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fayer, S.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Fruth, T.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
van der Grinten, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hans, S.;
Hanzel, K.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hillbrand, S.;
Hjemfelt, C.;
Hoff, M. D.;
Hor, J. Y-K.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ji, W.;
Kaboth, A. C.;
Kamdin, K.;
Keefner, J.;
Khaitan, D.;
Khazov, A.;
Kim, Y. D.;
Kocher, C. D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kraus, H.;
Krebs, H. J.;
Kreczko, L.;
Krikler, B.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Kyre, S.;
Lee, J.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Leonard, D. S.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Levy, C.;
Li, J.;
Liao, J.;
Liao, F. -T.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Linehan, R.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Liu, X.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Paredes, B. López;
Lorenzon, W.;
Luitz, S.;
Lyle, J. M.;
Majewski, P.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Maupin, C.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Meng, Y.;
Miller, E. H.;
Mock, J.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morad, J. A.;
Morrison, E.;
Mount, B. J.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nikoleyczik, J.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Olcina, I.;
Olevitch, M. A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Patton, S. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Penning, B.;
Piepke, A.;
Powell, S.;
Preece, R. M.;
Pushkin, K.;
Ratcliff, B. N.;
Reichenbacher, J.;
Rhyne, C. A.;
Richards, A.;
Rodrigues, J. P.;
Rosero, R.;
Rossiter, P.;
Saba, J. S.;
Sarychev, M.;
Schnee, R. W.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scovell, P. R.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silk, J. J.;
Silva, C.;
Skarpaas, K.;
Skulski, W.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stancu, I.;
Stark, M. R.;
Stiegler, T. M.;
Stifter, K.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Temples, D.;
Terman, P. A.;
Thomas, K. J.;
Timalsina, M.;
To, W. H.;
Tomás, A.;
Tope, T. E.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tull, C. E.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Va'vra, J.;
Vacheret, A.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Voirin, E.;
Waldron, W. L.;
Watson, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, D. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Wisniewski, W. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Worm, S. D.;
Yeh, M.;
Yin, J.;
Young, I.
Submitted: 2018-02-16, last modified: 2019-12-02
LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) is a next generation dark matter direct detection experiment
that will operate 4850 feet underground at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility (SURF) in Lead, South Dakota, USA. Using a two-phase xenon detector
with an active mass of 7 tonnes, LZ will search primarily for low-energy
interactions with Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), which are
hypothesized to make up the dark matter in our galactic halo. In this paper,
the projected WIMP sensitivity of LZ is presented based on the latest
background estimates and simulations of the detector. For a 1000 live day run
using a 5.6 tonne fiducial mass, LZ is projected to exclude at 90% confidence
level spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross sections above $1.6 \times 10^{-48}$
cm$^{2}$ for a 40 $\mathrm{GeV}/c^{2}$ mass WIMP. Additionally, a $5\sigma$
discovery potential is projected reaching cross sections below the existing and
projected exclusion limits of similar experiments that are currently operating.
For spin-dependent WIMP-neutron(-proton) scattering, a sensitivity of $2.7
\times 10^{-43}$ cm$^{2}$ ($8.1 \times 10^{-42}$ cm$^{2}$) for a 40
$\mathrm{GeV}/c^{2}$ mass WIMP is expected. With underground installation well
underway, LZ is on track for commissioning at SURF in 2020.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.11241 [pdf] - 1981692
Results of a Search for Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using 2013 LUX Data
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2018-11-27, last modified: 2019-10-16
The scattering of dark matter (DM) particles with sub-GeV masses off nuclei
is difficult to detect using liquid xenon-based DM search instruments because
the energy transfer during nuclear recoils is smaller than the typical detector
threshold. However, the tree-level DM-nucleus scattering diagram can be
accompanied by simultaneous emission of a Bremsstrahlung photon or a so-called
"Migdal" electron. These provide an electron recoil component to the
experimental signature at higher energies than the corresponding nuclear
recoil. The presence of this signature allows liquid xenon detectors to use
both the scintillation and the ionization signals in the analysis where the
nuclear recoil signal would not be otherwise visible. We report constraints on
spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering for DM particles with masses of 0.4-5
GeV/c$^2$ using 1.4$\times10^4$ kg$\cdot$day of search exposure from the 2013
data from the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment for four different
classes of mediators. This analysis extends the reach of liquid xenon-based DM
search instruments to lower DM masses than has been achieved previously.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12372 [pdf] - 1916847
Improved Measurements of the \b{eta}-Decay Response of Liquid Xenon with
the LUX Detector
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Baxter, A.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Jahangir, O.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Leason, E.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Naylor, A.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nilima, A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Riffard, Q.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, R.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Vacheret, A.;
Velan, V.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-06-07
We report results from an extensive set of measurements of the \b{eta}-decay
response in liquid xenon.These measurements are derived from high-statistics
calibration data from injected sources of both $^{3}$H and $^{14}$C in the LUX
detector. The mean light-to-charge ratio is reported for 13 electric field
values ranging from 43 to 491 V/cm, and for energies ranging from 1.5 to 145
keV.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07113 [pdf] - 1758152
Search for annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Boxer, B.;
Brás, P.;
Burdin, S.;
Byram, D.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gwilliam, C.;
Hall, C. R.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kravitz, S.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, J.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marangou, N.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Rischbieter, G. R. C.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rossiter, P.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Utku, U.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woodward, D.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2018-07-18, last modified: 2018-09-27
Various dark matter models predict annual and diurnal modulations of dark
matter interaction rates in Earth-based experiments as a result of the Earth's
motion in the halo. Observation of such features can provide generic evidence
for detection of dark matter interactions. This paper reports a search for both
annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX dark matter experiment using
over 20 calendar months of data acquired between 2013 and 2016. This search
focuses on electron recoil events at low energies, where leptophilic dark
matter interactions are expected to occur and where the DAMA experiment has
observed a strong rate modulation for over two decades. By using the innermost
volume of the LUX detector and developing robust cuts and corrections, we
obtained a stable event rate of 2.3$\pm$0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne, which
is among the lowest in all dark matter experiments. No statistically
significant annual modulation was observed in energy windows up to
26~keV$_{\text{ee}}$. Between 2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$, this analysis
demonstrates the most sensitive annual modulation search up to date, with
9.2$\sigma$ tension with the DAMA/LIBRA result. We also report no observation
of diurnal modulations above 0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne amplitude between
2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00800 [pdf] - 1611913
Ultra-Low Energy Calibration of LUX Detector using $^{127}$Xe Electron
Capture
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fan, A.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Genovesi, J.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-09-03
We report an absolute calibration of the ionization yields($\textit{Q$_y$})$
and fluctuations for electronic recoil events in liquid xenon at discrete
energies between 186 eV and 33.2 keV. The average electric field applied across
the liquid xenon target is 180 V/cm. The data are obtained using low energy
$^{127}$Xe electron capture decay events from the 95.0-day first run from LUX
(WS2013) in search of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). The
sequence of gamma-ray and X-ray cascades associated with $^{127}$I
de-excitations produces clearly identified 2-vertex events in the LUX detector.
We observe the K- (binding energy, 33.2 keV), L- (5.2 keV), M- (1.1 keV), and
N- (186 eV) shell cascade events and verify that the relative ratio of observed
events for each shell agrees with calculations. The N-shell cascade analysis
includes single extracted electron (SE) events and represents the lowest-energy
electronic recoil $\textit{in situ}$ measurements that have been explored in
liquid xenon.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02297 [pdf] - 1582421
First Searches for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with the LUX
Experiment
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Aquino, C.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-04-07, last modified: 2017-06-30
The first searches for axions and axion-like particles with the Large
Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment are presented. Under the assumption of an
axio-electric interaction in xenon, the coupling constant between axions and
electrons, gAe is tested, using data collected in 2013 with an exposure
totalling 95 live-days $\times$ 118 kg. A double-sided, profile likelihood
ratio statistic test excludes gAe larger than 3.5 $\times$ 10$^{-12}$ (90%
C.L.) for solar axions. Assuming the DFSZ theoretical description, the upper
limit in coupling corresponds to an upper limit on axion mass of 0.12
eV/c$^{2}$, while for the KSVZ description masses above 36.6 eV/c$^{2}$ are
excluded. For galactic axion-like particles, values of gAe larger than 4.2
$\times$ 10$^{-13}$ are excluded for particle masses in the range 1-16
keV/c$^{2}$. These are the most stringent constraints to date for these
interactions.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.03380 [pdf] - 1583256
Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the
complete LUX exposure
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fallon, S. R.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Velan, V.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2017-05-09, last modified: 2017-06-23
We present experimental constraints on the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon
elastic cross sections from the total 129.5 kg-year exposure acquired by the
Large Underground Xenon experiment (LUX), operating at the Sanford Underground
Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota (USA). A profile likelihood ratio
analysis allows 90% CL upper limits to be set on the WIMP-neutron (WIMP-proton)
cross section of $\sigma_n$ = 1.6$\times 10^{-41}$ cm$^{2}$ ($\sigma_p$ =
5$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^{2}$) at 35 GeV$c^{-2}$, almost a sixfold improvement
over the previous LUX spin-dependent results. The spin-dependent WIMP-neutron
limit is the most sensitive constraint to date.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.07648 [pdf] - 1531370
Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bramante, R.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2016-08-26, last modified: 2017-01-13
We report constraints on spin-independent weakly interacting massive particle
(WIMP)-nucleon scattering using a 3.35e4 kg-day exposure of the Large
Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment. A dual-phase xenon time projection chamber
with 250 kg of active mass is operated at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility under Lead, South Dakota (USA). With roughly fourfold improvement in
sensitivity for high WIMP masses relative to our previous results, this search
yields no evidence of WIMP nuclear recoils. At a WIMP mass of 50 GeV/c^2,
WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross sections above 2.2e-46 cm^2 are excluded at
the 90% confidence level. When combined with the previously reported LUX
exposure, this exclusion strengthens to 1.1e-46 cm^2 at 50 GeV/c^2.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.05381 [pdf] - 1503451
Low-energy (0.7-74 keV) nuclear recoil calibration of the LUX dark
matter experiment using D-D neutron scattering kinematics
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Alsum, S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Brás, P.;
Byram, D.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C. A.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solmaz, M.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W. C.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Xu, J.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2016-08-18, last modified: 2016-10-26
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment is a dual-phase liquid xenon
time projection chamber (TPC) operating at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility in Lead, South Dakota. A calibration of nuclear recoils in liquid
xenon was performed $\textit{in situ}$ in the LUX detector using a collimated
beam of mono-energetic 2.45 MeV neutrons produced by a deuterium-deuterium
(D-D) fusion source. The nuclear recoil energy from the first neutron scatter
in the TPC was reconstructed using the measured scattering angle defined by
double-scatter neutron events within the active xenon volume. We measured the
absolute charge ($Q_{y}$) and light ($L_{y}$) yields at an average electric
field of 180 V/cm for nuclear recoil energies spanning 0.7 to 74 keV and 1.1 to
74 keV, respectively. This calibration of the nuclear recoil signal yields will
permit the further refinement of liquid xenon nuclear recoil signal models and,
importantly for dark matter searches, clearly demonstrates measured ionization
and scintillation signals in this medium at recoil energies down to
$\mathcal{O}$(1 keV).
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.03506 [pdf] - 1406496
Improved Limits on Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles
from Reanalysis of 2013 LUX data
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Ott, R. A.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Yazdani, K.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2015-12-10, last modified: 2016-05-16
We present constraints on weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP)-nucleus
scattering from the 2013 data of the Large Underground Xenon dark matter
experiment, including $1.4\times10^{4}\;\mathrm{kg\; day}$ of search exposure.
This new analysis incorporates several advances: single-photon calibration at
the scintillation wavelength, improved event-reconstruction algorithms, a
revised background model including events originating on the detector walls in
an enlarged fiducial volume, and new calibrations from decays of an injected
tritium $\beta$ source and from kinematically constrained nuclear recoils down
to 1.1 keV. Sensitivity, especially to low-mass WIMPs, is enhanced compared to
our previous results which modeled the signal only above a 3 keV minimum
energy. Under standard dark matter halo assumptions and in the mass range above
4 $\mathrm{GeV}\,c^{-2}$, these new results give the most stringent direct
limits on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section. The 90% C.L. upper
limit has a minimum of 0.6 zb at 33 $\mathrm{GeV}\,c^{-2}$ WIMP mass.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.03133 [pdf] - 1402511
Tritium calibration of the LUX dark matter experiment
LUX Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bradley, A.;
Bramante, R.;
Cahn, S. B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Chan, C.;
Chapman, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gibson, K. R.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Hall, C. R.;
Hanhardt, M.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hogan, D. P.;
Horn, M.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Ihm, M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Knoche, R.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Lindote, A.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A. G.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. M.;
Mock, J.;
Moongweluwan, M.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nehrkorn, C.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
O`Sullivan, K.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Ott, R. A.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Pease, E. K.;
Phelps, P.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Stephenson, S.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Webb, R. C.;
White, J. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2015-12-09, last modified: 2016-05-05
We present measurements of the electron-recoil (ER) response of the LUX dark
matter detector based upon 170,000 highly pure and spatially-uniform tritium
decays. We reconstruct the tritium energy spectrum using the combined energy
model and find good agreement with expectations. We report the average charge
and light yields of ER events in liquid xenon at 180 V/cm and 105 V/cm and
compare the results to the NEST model. We also measure the mean charge
recombination fraction and its fluctuations, and we investigate the location
and width of the LUX ER band. These results provide input to a re-analysis of
the LUX Run3 WIMP search.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.02910 [pdf] - 1286987
LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Conceptual Design Report
The LZ Collaboration;
Akerib, D. S.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Akimov, D. Yu.;
Alsum, S. K.;
Araújo, H. M.;
Bai, X.;
Bailey, A. J.;
Balajthy, J.;
Balashov, S.;
Barry, M. J.;
Bauer, P.;
Beltrame, P.;
Bernard, E. P.;
Bernstein, A.;
Biesiadzinski, T. P.;
Boast, K. E.;
Bolozdynya, A. I.;
Boulton, E. M.;
Bramante, R.;
Buckley, J. H.;
Bugaev, V. V.;
Bunker, R.;
Burdin, S.;
Busenitz, J. K.;
Carels, C.;
Carlsmith, D. L.;
Carlson, B.;
Carmona-Benitez, M. C.;
Cascella, M.;
Chan, C.;
Cherwinka, J. J.;
Chiller, A. A.;
Chiller, C.;
Craddock, W. W.;
Currie, A.;
Cutter, J. E.;
da Cunha, J. P.;
Dahl, C. E.;
Dasu, S.;
Davison, T. J. R.;
de Viveiros, L.;
Dobi, A.;
Dobson, J. E. Y.;
Druszkiewicz, E.;
Edberg, T. K.;
Edwards, B. N.;
Edwards, W. R.;
Elnimr, M. M.;
Emmet, W. T.;
Faham, C. H.;
Fiorucci, S.;
Ford, P.;
Francis, V. B.;
Fu, C.;
Gaitskell, R. J.;
Gantos, N. J.;
Gehman, V. M.;
Gerhard, R. M.;
Ghag, C.;
Gilchriese, M. G. D.;
Gomber, B.;
Hall, C. R.;
Harris, A.;
Haselschwardt, S. J.;
Hertel, S. A.;
Hoff, M. D.;
Holbrook, B.;
Holtom, E.;
Huang, D. Q.;
Hurteau, T. W.;
Ignarra, C. M.;
Jacobsen, R. G.;
Ji, W.;
Ji, X.;
Johnson, M.;
Ju, Y.;
Kamdin, K.;
Kazkaz, K.;
Khaitan, D.;
Khazov, A.;
Khromov, A. V.;
Konovalov, A. M.;
Korolkova, E. V.;
Kraus, H.;
Krebs, H. J.;
Kudryavtsev, V. A.;
Kumpan, A. V.;
Kyre, S.;
Larsen, N. A.;
Lee, C.;
Lenardo, B. G.;
Lesko, K. T.;
Liao, F. -T.;
Lin, J.;
Lindote, A.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lopes, M. I.;
Lorenzon, W.;
Luitz, S.;
Majewski, P.;
Malling, D. C.;
Manalaysay, A. G.;
Manenti, L.;
Mannino, R. L.;
Markley, D. J.;
Martin, T. J.;
Marzioni, M. F.;
McKinsey, D. N.;
Mei, D. -M.;
Meng, Y.;
Miller, E. H.;
Mock, J.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morad, J. A.;
Murphy, A. St. J.;
Nelson, H. N.;
Neves, F.;
Nikkel, J. A.;
O'Neill, F. G.;
O'Dell, J.;
O'Sullivan, K.;
Olevitch, M. A.;
Oliver-Mallory, K. C.;
Palladino, K. J.;
Pangilinan, M.;
Patton, S. J.;
Pease, E. K.;
Piepke, A.;
Powell, S.;
Preece, R. M.;
Pushkin, K.;
Ratcliff, B. N.;
Reichenbacher, J.;
Reichhart, L.;
Rhyne, C.;
Rodrigues, J. P.;
Rose, H. J.;
Rosero, R.;
Saba, J. S.;
Sarychev, M.;
Schnee, R. W.;
Schubnell, M. S. G.;
Scovell, P. R.;
Shaw, S.;
Shutt, T. A.;
Silva, C.;
Skarpaas, K.;
Skulski, W.;
Solovov, V. N.;
Sorensen, P.;
Sosnovtsev, V. V.;
Stancu, I.;
Stark, M. R.;
Stephenson, S.;
Stiegler, T. M.;
Sumner, T. J.;
Sundarnath, K.;
Szydagis, M.;
Taylor, D. J.;
Taylor, W.;
Tennyson, B. P.;
Terman, P. A.;
Thomas, K. J.;
Thomson, J. A.;
Tiedt, D. R.;
To, W. H.;
Tomás, A.;
Tripathi, M.;
Tull, C. E.;
Tvrznikova, L.;
Uvarov, S.;
Va'vra, J.;
van der Grinten, M. G. D.;
Verbus, J. R.;
Vuosalo, C. O.;
Waldron, W. L.;
Wang, L.;
Webb, R. C.;
Wei, W. -Z.;
While, M.;
White, D. T.;
Whitis, T. J.;
Wisniewski, W. J.;
Witherell, M. S.;
Wolfs, F. L. H.;
Woods, E.;
Woodward, D.;
Worm, S. D.;
Yeh, M.;
Yin, J.;
Young, S. K.;
Zhang, C.
Submitted: 2015-09-09, last modified: 2015-09-23
The design and performance of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) detector is described as of
March 2015 in this Conceptual Design Report. LZ is a second-generation
dark-matter detector with the potential for unprecedented sensitivity to weakly
interacting massive particles (WIMPs) of masses from a few GeV/c2 to hundreds
of TeV/c2. With total liquid xenon mass of about 10 tonnes, LZ will be the most
sensitive experiment for WIMPs in this mass region by the end of the decade.
This report describes in detail the design of the LZ technical systems.
Expected backgrounds are quantified and the performance of the experiment is
presented. The LZ detector will be located at the Sanford Underground Research
Facility in South Dakota. The organization of the LZ Project and a summary of
the expected cost and current schedule are given.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.4808 [pdf] - 588683
A Measurement of the Correlation of Galaxy Surveys with CMB Lensing
Convergence Maps from the South Pole Telescope
Bleem, L. E.;
van Engelen, A.;
Holder, G. P.;
Aird, K. A.;
Armstrong, R.;
Ashby, M. L. N.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Biesiadzinski, T.;
Brodwin, M.;
Busha, M. T.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H. M.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Doré, O.;
Dudley, J.;
Geach, J. E.;
George, E. M.;
Gladders, M. D.;
Gonzalez, A. H.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N.;
High, F. W.;
Holden, B. P.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hoover, S.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Joy, M.;
Keisler, R.;
Knox, L.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Lueker, M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Martinez-Manso, J.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Mehl, J.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Montroy, T. E.;
Natoli, T.;
Padin, S.;
Plagge, T.;
Pryke, C.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rest, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Saliwanchik, B. R.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Shaw, L.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Spieler, H. G.;
Stalder, B.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Stern, D.;
Story, K.;
Vallinotto, A.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Williamson, R.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2012-03-21, last modified: 2012-11-09
We compare cosmic microwave background lensing convergence maps derived from
South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with galaxy survey data from the Blanco
Cosmology Survey, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, and a new large
Spitzer/IRAC field designed to overlap with the SPT survey. Using optical and
infrared catalogs covering between 17 and 68 square degrees of sky, we detect
correlation between the SPT convergence maps and each of the galaxy density
maps at >4 sigma, with zero cross-correlation robustly ruled out in all cases.
The amplitude and shape of the cross-power spectra are in good agreement with
theoretical expectations and the measured galaxy bias is consistent with
previous work. The detections reported here utilize a small fraction of the
full 2500 square degree SPT survey data and serve as both a proof of principle
of the technique and an illustration of the potential of this emerging
cosmological probe.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.0865 [pdf] - 1150515
PreCam, a Precursor Observational Campaign for Calibration of the Dark
Energy Survey
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J. T.;
Bailey, T.;
Balbinot, E.;
Bernstein, J. P.;
Biesiadzinski, T.;
Burke, D. L.;
Butner, M.;
Camargo, J. I. B.;
da Costa, L. A. N.;
DePoy, D.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Estrada, J.;
Fausti, A.;
Gerke, B.;
Guarino, V.;
Head, H. H.;
Kessler, R.;
Lin, H.;
Lorenzon, W.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maki, L.;
Marshall, J.;
Nord, B.;
Neilsen, E.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Park, D.;
Peoples, J.;
Rastawicki, D.;
Rheault, J. -P.;
Santiago, B.;
Schubnell, M.;
Seitzer, P.;
Smith, J. A.;
Spinka, H.;
Sypniewski, A.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2012-08-03
PreCam, a precursor observational campaign supporting the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), is designed to produce a photometric and astrometric catalog of nearly a
hundred thousand standard stars within the DES footprint, while the PreCam
instrument also serves as a prototype testbed for the Dark Energy Camera
(DECam)'s hardware and software. This catalog represents a potential 100-fold
increase in Southern Hemisphere photometric standard stars, and therefore will
be an important component in the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey. We
provide details on the PreCam instrument's design, construction and testing, as
well as results from a subset of the 51 nights of PreCam survey observations on
the University of Michigan Department of Astronomy's Curtis-Schmidt telescope
at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory. We briefly describe the preliminary
data processing pipeline that has been developed for PreCam data and the
preliminary results of the instrument performance, as well as astrometry and
photometry of a sample of stars previously included in other southern sky
surveys.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1201.1282 [pdf] - 1092754
Impact of Systematics on SZ-Optical Scaling Relations
Submitted: 2012-01-05, last modified: 2012-06-28
One of the central goals of multi-wavelength galaxy cluster cosmology is to
unite all cluster observables to form a consistent understanding of cluster
mass. Here, we study the impact of systematic effects from optical cluster
catalogs on stacked SZ signals. We show that the optically predicted
Y-decrement can vary by as much as 50% based on the current 2 sigma systematic
uncertainties in the observed mass-richness relationship. Mis-centering and
impurities will suppress the SZ signal compared to expectations for a clean and
perfectly centered optical sample, but to a lesser degree. We show that the
level of these variations and suppression is dependent on the amount of
systematics in the optical cluster catalogs. We also study X-ray
luminosity-dependent sub-sampling of the optical catalog and find that it
creates Malmquist bias increasing the observed Y-decrement of the stacked
signal. We show that the current Planck measurements of the Y-decrement around
SDSS optical clusters and their X-ray counterparts are consistent with
expectations after accounting for the 1 sigma optical systematic uncertainties
using the Johnston mass richness relation.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.1090 [pdf] - 1077095
Reciprocity Failure in HgCdTe Detectors: Measurements and Mitigation
Submitted: 2011-06-06
A detailed study of reciprocity failure in four 1.7 micron cutoff HgCdTe
near-infrared detectors is presented. The sensitivity to reciprocity failure is
approximately 0.1%\decade over up to five orders of magnitude in illumination
intensity. The four detectors, which represent three successive production runs
with modified growth recipes, show large differences in amount and spatial
structure of reciprocity failure. Reciprocity failure could be reduced to
negligible levels by cooling the detectors to about 110 K. No wavelength
dependence was observed. The observed spatial structure appears to be weakly
correlated with image persistence.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.2411 [pdf] - 1042503
Measurement of Reciprocity Failure in Near Infrared Detectors
Submitted: 2010-12-10
Flux dependent non-linearity (reciprocity failure) in HgCdTe near infrared
detectors can severely impact an instrument's performance, in particular with
respect to precision photometric measurements. The cause of this effect is
presently not understood. To investigate reciprocity failure, a dedicated test
system was built. For flux levels between 1 and 50,000 photons/s, a sensitivity
to reciprocity failure of approximately 0.1%/decade was achieved. A wavelength
independent non-linearity due to reciprocity failure of about 0.35%/decade was
measured in a 1.7 micron HgCdTe detector.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.3369 [pdf] - 1034382
Investigating reciprocity failure in 1.7-micron cut-off HgCdTe detectors
Submitted: 2010-08-19
Flux dependent non-linearity (reciprocity failure) in HgCdTe NIR detectors
with 1.7 micron cut-off was investigated. A dedicated test station was designed
and built to measure reciprocity failure over the full dynamic range of near
infrared detectors. For flux levels between 1 and 100,000 photons/sec a
limiting sensitivity to reciprocity failure of 0.3%/decade was achieved. First
measurements on several engineering grade 1.7 micron cut-off HgCdTe detectors
show a wide range of reciprocity failure, from less than 0.5%/decade to about
10%/decade. For at least two of the tested detectors, significant spatial
variation in the effect was observed. No indication for wavelength dependency
was found. The origin of reciprocity failure is currently not well understood.
In this paper we present details of our experimental set-up and show the
results of measurements for several detectors.