Spectroscopy provides an immense amount of information on stellar objects, and this field continues to grow with recent developments in multi-object data acquisition and rapid data analysis techniques. Current automated methods for analyzing spectra are either (a) data-driven models, which require large amounts of data with prior knowledge of stellar parameters and elemental abundances, or (b) based on theoretical synthetic models that are susceptible to the gap between theory and practice. In this study, we present a hybrid generative domain adaptation method to turn simulated stellar spectra into realistic spectra, learning from the large spectroscopic surveys. We use a neural network to emulate computationally expensive stellar spectra simulations, and then train a separate unsupervised domain-adaptation network that learns to relate the generated synthetic spectra to observational spectra. Consequently, the network essentially produces data-driven models without the need for a labeled training set. As a proof of concept, two case studies are presented. The first of which is the auto-calibration of synthetic models without using any standard stars. To accomplish this, synthetic models are morphed into spectra that resemble observations, thereby reducing the gap between theory and observations. The second case study is the identification of the elemental source of missing spectral lines in the synthetic modelling. These sources are predicted by interpreting the differences between the domain-adapted and original spectral models. To test our ability to identify missing lines, we use a mock dataset and show that, even with noisy observations, absorption lines can be recovered when they are absent in one of the domains. While we focus on spectral analyses in this study, this method can be applied to other fields, which use large data sets and are currently limited by modelling accuracy.

We discuss how to achieve mapping from large sets of imperfect simulations and observational data with unsupervised domain adaptation. Under the hypothesis that simulated and observed data distributions share a common underlying representation, we show how it is possible to transfer between simulated and observed domains. Driven by an application to interpret stellar spectroscopic sky surveys, we construct the domain transfer pipeline from two adversarial autoencoders on each domains with a disentangling latent space, and a cycle-consistency constraint. We then construct a differentiable pipeline from physical stellar parameters to realistic observed spectra, aided by a supplementary generative surrogate physics emulator network. We further exemplify the potential of the method on the reconstructed spectra quality and to discover new spectral features associated to elemental abundances.

The orbits of the least chemically enriched stars open a window on the formation of our Galaxy when it was still in its infancy. The common picture is that these low-metallicity stars are distributed as an isotropic, pressure-supported component since these stars were either accreted from the early building blocks of the assembling Milky Way, or were later brought by the accretion of faint dwarf galaxies. Combining the metallicities and radial velocities from the Pristine and LAMOST surveys and Gaia DR2 parallaxes and proper motions for an unprecedented large and unbiased sample of very metal-poor stars at $[Fe/H]\leq-2.5$ we show that this picture is incomplete. This sample shows strong statistical evidence (at the $5.0\sigma$ level) of asymmetry in their kinematics, favouring prograde motion. Moreover, we find that $31\%$ of the stars that currently reside in the disk do not venture outside of the disk plane throughout their orbit. The discovery of this population implies that a significant fraction of stars with iron abundances $[Fe/H]\leq-2.5$ formed within or concurrently with the Milky Way disk and that the history of the disk was quiet enough to allow them to retain their disk-like orbital properties.

In the era of stellar spectroscopic surveys, synthetic spectral libraries will form the basis for the derivation of the stellar parameters and chemical abundances. In this paper, four popular synthetic grids (INTRIGOSS, FERRE, AMBRE, and PHOENIX) are used in our deep learning prediction framework (StarNet), and compared in an application to optical spectra from the Gaia-ESO survey. The stellar parameters for temperature, surface gravity, metallicity, radial velocity, rotational velocity, and [{\alpha}/Fe] are determined simultaneously for FGK type dwarfs and giants. StarNet was modified to mitigate the differences in the sampling between the synthetic grids and the observed spectra, by augmenting the grids with realistic observational signatures, in an attempt to incorporate both modelling and statistical uncertainties as part of the training. When applied to spectra from the Gaia-ESO spectroscopic survey and the Gaia-ESO benchmark stars, the INTRIGOSS-trained StarNet showed the best results with the least scatter. Training with the FERRE synthetic grid produces similarly accurate predictions (followed closely by the AMBRE grid), but over a wider range in stellar parameters and spectroscopic wavelengths . In the future, improvements in the underlying physics that generates these synthetic grids will be necessary for consistent high precision stellar parameters and chemical abundances from machine learning and other sophisticated data analysis tools.

Spectroscopic surveys require fast and efficient analysis methods to maximize their scientific impact. Here we apply a deep neural network architecture to analyze both SDSS-III APOGEE DR13 and synthetic stellar spectra. When our convolutional neural network model (StarNet) is trained on APOGEE spectra, we show that the stellar parameters (temperature, gravity, and metallicity) are determined with similar precision and accuracy as the APOGEE pipeline. StarNet can also predict stellar parameters when trained on synthetic data, with excellent precision and accuracy for both APOGEE data and synthetic data, over a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios. In addition, the statistical uncertainties in the stellar parameter determinations are comparable to the differences between the APOGEE pipeline results and those determined independently from optical spectra. We compare StarNet to other data-driven methods; for example, StarNet and the Cannon 2 show similar behaviour when trained with the same datasets, however StarNet performs poorly on small training sets like those used by the original Cannon. The influence of the spectral features on the stellar parameters is examined via partial derivatives of the StarNet model results with respect to the input spectra. While StarNet was developed using the APOGEE observed spectra and corresponding ASSET synthetic data, we suggest that this technique is applicable to other wavelength ranges and other spectral surveys.