Normalized to: Bhirombhakdi, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01950 [pdf] - 2118898
Observational constraints on the optical and near-infrared emission from
the neutron star-black hole binary merger S190814bv
Ackley, K.;
Amati, L.;
Barbieri, C.;
Bauer, F. E.;
Benetti, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bhirombhakdi, K.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brocato, E.;
Bruun, S. H.;
Bulla, M.;
Campana, S.;
Cappellaro, E.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Chaty, S.;
Chen, T. -W.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Coleiro, A.;
Copperwheat, C. M.;
Covino, S.;
Cutter, R.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
De Cesare, G.;
D'Elia, V.;
Della Valle, M.;
Denneau, L.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Dhillon, V. S.;
Dyer, M. J.;
Elias-Rosa, N.;
Evans, P. A.;
Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J.;
Fiore, A.;
Fraser, M.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Galbany, L.;
Gall, C.;
Galloway, D. K.;
Getman, F. I.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Gillanders, J. H.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gompertz, B. P.;
González-Fernández, C.;
González-Gaitán, S.;
Grado, A.;
Greco, G.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Groot, P. J.;
Gutiérrez, C. P.;
Heikkilä, T.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Hjorth, J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Huber, M. E.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Japelj, J.;
Jerkstrand, A.;
Jin, Z. P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kennedy, M.;
Kim, S.;
Klose, S.;
Kool, E. C.;
Kotak, R.;
Kuncarayakti, H.;
Lamb, G. P.;
Leloudas, G.;
Levan, A. J.;
Longo, F.;
Lowe, T. B.;
Lyman, J. D.;
Magnier, E.;
Maguire, K.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mandel, I.;
Mapelli, M.;
Mattila, S.;
McBrien, O. R.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Milvang-Jensen, B.;
Moran, S.;
Nicastro, L.;
Nicholl, M.;
Guelbenzu, A. Nicuesa;
Nuttal, L.;
Oates, S. R.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Onori, F.;
Palazzi, E.;
Patricelli, B.;
Perego, A.;
Torres, M. A. P.;
Perley, D. A.;
Pian, E.;
Pignata, G.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Poshyachinda, S.;
Possenti, A.;
Pumo, M. L.;
Quirola-Vásquez, J.;
Ragosta, F.;
Ramsay, G.;
Rau, A.;
Rest, A.;
Reynolds, T. M.;
Rosetti, S. S.;
Rossi, A.;
Rosswog, S.;
Sabha, N. B.;
Carracedo, A. Sagués;
Salafia, O. S.;
Salmon, L.;
Salvaterra, R.;
Savaglio, S.;
Sbordone, L.;
Schady, P.;
Schipani, P.;
Schultz, A. S. B.;
Schweyer, T.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, K. W.;
Smith, M.;
Sollerman, J.;
Srivastav, S.;
Stanway, E. R.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Steeghs, D.;
Stratta, G.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Testa, V.;
Thrane, E.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Turatto, M.;
Ulaczyk, K.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Vergani, S. D.;
Walton, N. A.;
Watson, D.;
Wiersema, K.;
Wiik, K.;
Wyrzykowski, L.;
Yang, S.;
Yi, S. -X.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-02-05, last modified: 2020-06-22
On 2019 August 14, the LIGO and Virgo interferometers detected a
high-significance event labelled S190814bv. Preliminary analysis of the GW data
suggests that the event was likely due to the merger of a compact binary system
formed by a BH and a NS. ElectromagNetic counterparts of GRAvitational wave
sources at the VEry Large Telescope (ENGRAVE) collaboration members carried out
an intensive multi-epoch, multi-instrument observational campaign to identify
the possible optical/near infrared counterpart of the event. In addition, the
ATLAS, GOTO, GRAWITA-VST, Pan-STARRS and VINROUGE projects also carried out a
search on this event. Our observations allow us to place limits on the presence
of any counterpart and discuss the implications for the kilonova (KN) possibly
generated by this NS-BH merger, and for the strategy of future searches.
Altogether, our observations allow us to exclude a KN with large ejecta mass
$M\gtrsim 0.1\,\mathrm{M_\odot}$ to a high ($>90\%$) confidence, and we can
exclude much smaller masses in a subsample of our observations. This disfavours
the tidal disruption of the neutron star during the merger. Despite the
sensitive instruments involved in the campaign, given the distance of S190814bv
we could not reach sufficiently deep limits to constrain a KN comparable in
luminosity to AT 2017gfo on a large fraction of the localisation probability.
This suggests that future (likely common) events at a few hundreds Mpc will be
detected only by large facilities with both high sensitivity and large field of
view. Galaxy-targeted observations can reach the needed depth over a relevant
portion of the localisation probability with a smaller investment of resources,
but the number of galaxies to be targeted in order to get a fairly complete
coverage is large, even in the case of a localisation as good as that of this
event.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.05840 [pdf] - 2077451
An extremely energetic supernova from a very massive star in a dense
medium
Nicholl, Matt;
Blanchard, Peter K.;
Berger, Edo;
Chornock, Ryan;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Gomez, Sebastian;
Lunnan, Ragnhild;
Miller, Adam A.;
Fong, Wen-fai;
Terreran, Giacomo;
Vigna-Gomez, Alejandro;
Bhirombhakdi, Kornpob;
Bieryla, Allyson;
Challis, Pete;
Laher, Russ R.;
Masci, Frank J.;
Paterson, Kerry
Submitted: 2020-04-13
The interaction of a supernova with a circumstellar medium (CSM) can
dramatically increase the emitted luminosity by converting kinetic energy to
thermal energy. In 'superluminous' supernovae (SLSNe) of Type IIn -- named for
narrow hydrogen lines in their spectra -- the integrated emission can reach
$\sim 10^{51}$ erg, attainable by thermalising most of the kinetic energy of a
conventional SN. A few transients in the centres of active galaxies have shown
similar spectra and even larger energies, but are difficult to distinguish from
accretion onto the supermassive black hole. Here we present a new event,
SN2016aps, offset from the centre of a low-mass galaxy, that radiated $\gtrsim
5 \times 10^{51}$ erg, necessitating a hyper-energetic supernova explosion. We
find a total (SN ejecta $+$ CSM) mass likely exceeding 50-100 M$_\odot$, with
energy $\gtrsim 10^{52}$ erg, consistent with some models of pair-instability
supernovae (PISNe) or pulsational PISNe -- theoretically-predicted
thermonuclear explosions from helium cores $>50$ M$_\odot$. Independent of the
explosion mechanism, this event demonstrates the existence of extremely
energetic stellar explosions, detectable at very high redshifts, and provides
insight into dense CSM formation in the most massive stars.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.02755 [pdf] - 1771685
One thousand days of SN 2015bn: HST imaging shows a light curve
flattening consistent with magnetar predictions
Nicholl, Matt;
Blanchard, Peter K.;
Berger, Edo;
Alexander, Kate D.;
Metzger, Brian D.;
Bhirombhakdi, Kornpob;
Chornock, Ryan;
Coppejans, Deanne L.;
Gomez, Sebastian;
Margalit, Ben;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Terreran, Giacomo
Submitted: 2018-09-08, last modified: 2018-10-10
We present the first observations of a Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN)
at $\gtrsim 1000$ days after maximum light. We observed SN 2015bn using the
Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys in the F475W, F625W and
F775W filters at 721 days and 1068 days. SN 2015bn is clearly detected and
resolved from its compact host, allowing reliable photometry. A galaxy template
constructed from these data further enables us to isolate the SLSN flux in deep
ground-based imaging. We measure a light curve decline rate at $>700$ days of
$0.19 \pm 0.03$ mag (100 d)$^{-1}$, much shallower than the earlier evolution,
and slower than previous SLSNe (at any phase) or the decay rate of $^{56}$Co.
Neither additional radioactive isotopes nor a light echo can consistently
account for the slow decline. A spectrum at 1083 days shows the same [O I] and
[Ca II] lines as seen at $\sim300-400$ days, with no new features to indicate
strong circumstellar interaction. Radio limits with the Very Large Array rule
out an extended wind for mass-loss rates $10^{-2.7} \lesssim \dot{M}/v_{10}
\lesssim 10^{-1.1}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ (where $v_{10}$ is the wind velocity in
units of 10 km s$^{-1}$). The optical light curve is consistent with $L \propto
t^{-4}$, which we show is expected for magnetar spin-down with inefficient
trapping; furthermore, the evolution matches predictions from earlier magnetar
model fits. The opacity to magnetar radiation is constrained at $\sim 0.01$
cm$^2$ g$^{-1}$, consistent with photon-matter pair-production over a broad
$\sim$GeV-TeV range. This suggests the magnetar spectral energy distribution,
and hence the 'missing energy' leaking from the ejecta, may peak in this range.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.02760 [pdf] - 1790989
Where is the engine hiding its missing energy? Constraints from a deep
X-ray non-detection of the Superluminous SN 2015bn
Submitted: 2018-09-08
SN 2015bn is a nearby hydrogen-poor superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) that has
been intensively observed in X-rays with the goal to detect the spin-down
powered emission from a magnetar engine. The early-time UV/optical/infrared
(UVOIR) data fit well to the magnetar model, but require leakage of energy at
late times of $\lesssim 10^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$, which is expected to be
partially emitted in X-rays. Deep X-ray limits until $\sim$300 days after
explosion revealed no X-ray emission. Here, we present the latest deep 0.3--10
keV X-ray limit at 805 days obtained with \textit{XMM-Newton}. We find $L_X <
10^{41}$ erg s$^{-1}$, with no direct evidence for central-engine powered
emission. While the late-time optical data still follow the prediction of the
magnetar model, the best-fit model to the bolometric light curve predicts that
$\sim$97\% of the total input luminosity of the magnetar is escaping outside of
the UVOIR bandpass at the time of observation. Our X-ray upper limit is
$<$1.5\% of the input luminosity, strongly constraining the high-energy
leakage, unless non-radiative losses are important. These deep X-ray
observations identify a missing energy problem in SLSNe-I and we suggest future
observations in hard X-rays and $\gamma$-rays for better constraints. Also,
independent of the optical data, we constrain the parameter spaces of various
X-ray emission scenarios, including ionization breakout by magnetar spin-down,
shock interaction between the ejecta and external circumstellar medium,
off-axis $\gamma$-ray burst afterglow, and black hole fallback accretion.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07859 [pdf] - 1924913
The Type II Superluminous SN 2008es at Late Times: Near-Infrared Excess
and Circumstellar Interaction
Submitted: 2018-07-20
SN 2008es is one of the rare cases of a Type II superluminous supernova
(SLSN) showing no relatively narrow features in its early-time spectra, and
therefore its powering mechanism is under debate between circumstellar
interaction (CSI) and magnetar spin-down. Late-time data are required for
better constraints. We present optical and near-infrared (NIR) photometry
obtained from Gemini, Keck, and Palomar Observatories from 192 to 554 days
after explosion. Only broad H$\alpha$ emission is detected in a Gemini spectrum
at 288 days. The line profile exhibits red-wing attenuation relative to the
early-time spectrum. In addition to the cooling SN photosphere, a NIR excess
with blackbody temperature $\sim1500$ K and radius $\sim10^{16}$ cm is
observed. This evidence supports dust condensation in the cool dense shell
being responsible for the spectral evolution and NIR excess. We favour CSI,
with $\sim2$--3 $\textrm{M}_\odot$ of circumstellar material (CSM) and
$\sim$10--20 $\textrm{M}_\odot$ of ejecta, as the powering mechanism, which
still dominates at our late-time epochs. Both models of uniform density and
steady wind fit the data equally well, with an effective CSM radius $\sim
10^{15}$ cm, supporting the efficient conversion of shock energy to radiation
by CSI. A low amount ($\lesssim 0.4$ $\textrm{M}_\odot$) of $^{56}$Ni is
possible but cannot be verified yet, since the light curve is dominated by CSI.
The magnetar spin-down powering mechanism cannot be ruled out, but is less
favoured because it overpredicts the late-time fluxes and may be inconsistent
with the presence of dust.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.07372 [pdf] - 1755924
The Type I Superluminous Supernova PS16aqv: Lightcurve Complexity and
Deep Limits on Radioactive Ejecta in a Fast Event
Submitted: 2018-05-18
[Abridged] We present UV/optical observations of PS16aqv (SN 2016ard), a Type
I superluminous supernova (SLSN-I) classified as part of our search for low-$z$
SLSNe. PS16aqv is a fast evolving SLSNe-I that reached a peak absolute
magnitude of $M_{r} \approx -22.1$. The lightcurves exhibit a significant
undulation at 30 rest-frame days after peak, with a behavior similar to
undulations seen in the slowly fading SLSN-I SN 2015bn. This similarity
strengthens the case that fast and slow SLSNe-I form a continuum with a common
origin. At $\approx\!80$ days after peak, the lightcurves exhibit a transition
to a slow decline, followed by significant subsequent steepening, indicative of
a plateau phase or a second significant undulation. Deep limits at $\approx280$
days after peak imply a tight constraint on the nickel mass, $M_{\rm Ni}
\lesssim 0.35$ M$_{\odot}$ (lower than for previous SLSNe-I), and indicate that
some SLSNe-I do not produce significantly more nickel than normal Type Ic SNe.
Using MOSFiT, we model the lightcurve with a magnetar central engine model and
find $P_{\rm spin} \approx 0.9$ ms, $B \approx 1.5 \times 10^{14}$ G, and
$M_{\rm ej} \approx 16$ M$_{\odot}$. The implied rapid spin-down time and large
reservoir of available energy coupled with the high ejecta mass may account for
the fast evolving lightcurve and slow spectroscopic evolution. We also study
the location of PS16aqv in its host galaxy and find that it occurred at an
offset of $2.46 \pm 0.21$ kpc from the central star-forming region. We find the
host galaxy exhibits low metallicity and spatially varying extinction and star
formation rate, with the explosion site exhibiting lower values than the
central region. The complexity seen in the lightcurves of PS16aqv and other
events highlights the importance of obtaining well-sampled lightcurves for
exploring deviations from a uniform decline.