Normalized to: Bhattacharyya, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.05000 [pdf] - 2107850
Cosmic spin and mass evolution of black holes and its impact
Submitted: 2020-04-10, last modified: 2020-05-29
We build an evolution model of the central black hole that depends on the
processes of gas accretion, the capture of stars, mergers as well as
electromagnetic torque. In case of gas accretion in the presence of cooling
sources, the flow is momentum-driven, after which the black hole reaches a
saturated mass; subsequently, it grows only by stellar capture and mergers. We
model the evolution of the mass and spin with the initial seed mass and spin in
$\Lambda$CDM cosmology. For stellar capture, we have assumed a power-law
density profile for the stellar cusp in a framework of relativistic loss cone
theory that include the effects of black hole spin, Carter's constant, loss
cone angular momentum, and capture radius. Based on this, the predicted capture
rates of $10^{-5}$--$10^{-6}$ yr$^{-1}$ are closer to the observed range. We
have considered the merger activity to be effective for $z \lesssim 4$, and we
self-consistently include the Blandford-Znajek torque. We calculate these
effects on the black hole growth individually and in combination, for deriving
the evolution. Before saturation, accretion dominates the black hole growth
($\sim 95\%$ of the final mass), and subsequently, stellar capture and mergers
take over with roughly equal contribution. The simulations of the evolution of
the $M_{\bullet} - \sigma$ relation using these effects are consistent with
available observations. We run our model backward in time and retrodict the
parameters at formation. Our model will provide useful inputs for building
demographics of the black holes and in formation scenarios involving stellar
capture.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.04536 [pdf] - 2076526
Evolution of the $M_{\bullet} - \sigma$ relation
Submitted: 2018-08-14
Black holes at the centers of the galaxies grow mainly by the processes of
accretion, mergers, and consumption of stars. In the case of gas accretion with
cooling sources, the flow is momentum driven, after which the black hole
reaches a saturated mass, and subsequently, it grows only by consumption of
stars. In addition, we include the effect of mergers on the growth of black
hole spin and mass and study its evolution as a function of redshift in a
$\Lambda$CDM cosmology using an initial seed mass and spin distribution
functions that we have derived. For the stellar ingestion, we have assumed a
power-law density profile for the galaxy in our framework of a new relativistic
loss cone theory that includes the effect of the black hole spin. We predict
the impact of the evolution on the $M_{\bullet} - \sigma$ relation and compare
it with available observations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05672 [pdf] - 2076511
The $M_{\bullet} - \sigma$ relation in spherical systems
Submitted: 2017-10-16
To investigate the $M_\bullet -\sigma$ relation, we consider realistic
elliptical galaxy profiles that are taken to follow a single power law density
profile given by $\rho(r) = \rho_{0}(r/ r_{0})^{-\gamma}$ or the Nuker
intensity profile. We calculate the density using Abel's formula in the latter
case by employing the derived stellar potential in both cases, we derive the
distribution function $f(E)$ of the stars in presence of the supermassive black
hole (SMBH) at the center and hence compute the line of sight (LOS) velocity
dispersion as a function of radius. For the typical range of values for masses
of SMBH, we obtain $M_{\bullet} \propto \sigma^{p}$ for different profiles. An
analytical relation $p = (2\gamma + 6)/(2 + \gamma)$ is found which is in
reasonable agreement with observations (for $\gamma$ = 0.75 - 1.4, $p$ = 3.6 -
5.3). Assuming that a proportionality relation holds between the black hole
mass and bulge mass, $ M_{\bullet} =f M_b$, and applying this to several
galaxies we find the individual best fit values of $p$ as a function of $f$;
also by minimizing $\chi^{2}$, we find the best fit global $p$ and $f$. For
Nuker profiles we find that $p$ = $3.81 \pm 0.004$ and $f$ = $(1.23 \pm
0.09)\times 10^{-3}$ which are consistent with the observed ranges.