sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Bhattacharjee, Pijushpani

Normalized to: Bhattacharjee, P.

43 article(s) in total. 1670 co-authors, from 1 to 8 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1905.04706  [pdf] - 2093082
Probing low-mass WIMP candidates of dark matter with tetrafluoroethane superheated liquid detectors
Comments: Major revisions: title and abstract slightly changed; method of estimating the bubble nucleation thresholds reformulated; main qualitative conclusions remain unchanged; Latex 27 pages, 9 figures; new references added; matches version accepted for publication in PRD
Submitted: 2019-05-12, last modified: 2020-04-18
Probing low mass (sub-GeV -- few GeV) Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) candidates of dark matter through WIMP-induced nuclear recoils in direct detection experiments requires use of detector materials consisting of low mass target nuclei and low threshold energy. Here we explore the potential of superheated liquid detectors (SLD) with a hydrogen containing liquid, namely, tetrafluoroethane (C$_{2}$H$_{2}$F$_{4}$) (b.p.~$-26.3^\circ\,$C), as the target material for probing low mass WIMPs. It is found that few-keV level recoil energy thresholds possible for bubble nucleation by WIMP-induced $^{12}$C and $^{19}$F recoils in C$_{2}$H$_{2}$F$_{4}$ SLDs operated at atmospheric pressure and gamma-ray insensitive temperatures of $T\, \lesssim\, 35^\circ\,$C have the potential to allow WIMPs in the few-GeV mass range to be probed at a WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross section sensitivity levels (90% C.L.) better than $4.6\times 10^{-5}\,$pb at WIMP masses down to $\sim$ 4 GeV with a total exposure of $\sim$ 1000 kg.day, provided that the ``thermodynamic efficiency" $\eta_{\rm T}$ that determines the bubble nucleation thresholds for the recoiling nuclei in C$_{2}$H$_{2}$F$_{4}$ is $\sim$ 50% or higher. Sensitivity to sub-GeV WIMP masses generally requires the detector to be sensitive to the WIMP-induced $^1$H recoils, which in turn requires the detector to be operated at temperatures $T\gtrsim 50^\circ\,$C and $\eta_{\rm T}$ close to 100%. At such relatively high temperatures (at atmospheric pressure), however, the detector would be sensitive to background gamma rays.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1911.00369  [pdf] - 1989655
Multiwavelength analysis of low surface brightness galaxies to study probable dark matter signature
Comments: 22 pages, 12 figures, 9 tables
Submitted: 2019-11-01
Low Surface Brightness (LSB) galaxies are thought to be one of the most dark matter (DM) dominated galaxies in our Universe. They have very diffuse, low surface density stellar disks that have poor star formation rates and hence appear faint in optical images. LSB galaxies are also very rich in neutral hydrogen (HI) gas which usually extends well beyond their stellar disks. Their extended HI rotation curves indicate the presence of very massive DM halos compared to normal bright galaxies and their mass to light (M/L) ratios are high, which is typical for dark matter dominated galaxies. Hence, LSB galaxies are ideal laboratories for the indirect detection of DM using observations of {\gamma}-ray emission which could possibly originate from pair-annihilation (or decay) of the weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) in their halos. In this paper, we have searched for WIMPannihilation or decay signatures in four LSB galaxies, UGC 12632, UGC 12732, UGC 11707, UGC 3371. Here we present an analysis of nearly nine years of data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT). Above 100 MeV, no excess emission was detected from the LSB galaxies. We have then determined the stacked {\gamma}-ray flux using spectra expected for WIMP annihilation. With the RX-DMFIT code, we have also predicted the possible upper limits for the detection of radio emission associated with WIMP annihilation from LSB galaxies. We have compared our results with different proposed theoretical WIMP models to examine the constraints on the parameter space of the DM models. We also discuss the possibility of detecting a positive signal from LSB galaxies using the upcoming ground-based {\gamma}-ray telescope, the Cherenkov Telescope Array.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.07542  [pdf] - 1947567
Analysis of Fermi-LAT data from Tucana-II: Possible constraints on the Dark Matter models with an intriguing hint of a signal
Comments: 23 pages, 16 figures, 7 tables
Submitted: 2018-04-20, last modified: 2019-08-22
Tucana-II (Tuc-II), a recently discovered and confirmed Ultra Faint Dwarf Spheroidal galaxy, has a high mass to light ratio as well as a large line-of-sight stellar velocity dispersion, thus making it an ideal candidate for an indirect dark matter (DM) search. In this paper, we have analyzed nine years of $\gamma$-ray data obtained from the \textit{Fermi}-LAT instrument from the direction of Tuc-II. The fact that a very weak significant $\gamma$-ray excess ($2.2\sigma$) over the background of Tuc-II have been detected from the location of this galaxy. We have observed that this excess of $\gamma$-ray emission from the of location Tuc-II rises with longer periods of data. If WIMP pair annihilation is assumed for this faint emission, for $b\bar{b}$ annihilation channel the test statistics (TS) value peaks at DM mass $\sim$ 14 GeV and for $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ annihilation channel it peaks at DM mass 4 GeV. It is then called for an estimation of the $95\%$ confidence level upper limit of the possible velocity weighted self-annihilation cross-section of the DM particles (WIMPs) within Tuc-II by fitting the observed $\gamma$-ray flux with spectra expected for DM annihilation. The estimated upper limits of the cross-sections from Tuc-II are then compared with two other dwarf galaxies that are considered to be good DM candidates in several studies. We have also compared our results with the cross-sections obtained in various popular theoretical models of the WIMPs to find that our results impose reasonable tight constraints on the parameter spaces of those DM models. In the concluding section, we compared our results with the similar results obtained from a combined dSph analysis by the \textit{Fermi}-LAT collaboration as well as the results obtained from the studies of DM in the dwarf galaxies by the major ground-based Cherenkov experiments.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1902.01081  [pdf] - 1851680
VHE Gamma-ray Observation of Crab Nebula with HAGAR Telescope Array
Comments: Accepted for publication in experimental astronomy
Submitted: 2019-02-04
HAGAR is a system of seven Non-imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes located at Hanle in the Ladakh region of the Indian Himalayas at an altitude of 4270 meters {\it amsl}. Since 2008, we have observed the Crab Nebula to assess the performance of the HAGAR telescopes. We describe the analysis technique for the estimation of $\gamma$-ray signal amidst cosmic ray background. The consolidated results spanning nine years of the Crab nebula observations show long term performance of the HAGAR telescopes. Based on about 219 hours of data, we report the detection of $\gamma$-rays from the Crab Nebula at a significance level of about 20$\sigma$, corresponding to a time averaged flux of (1.64$\pm$0.09) $\times10^{-10}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ sec$^{-1}$ above 230 GeV. Also, we perform a detailed study of possible systematic effects in our analysis method on data taken with the HAGAR telescopes.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1801.05961  [pdf] - 1662405
Investigating the region of 3C 397 in High Energy Gamma rays
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures, Proceeding of IAU Symposium No. 331, 2017
Submitted: 2018-01-18, last modified: 2018-04-07
We investigate the supernova remnant (SNR) 3C 397 and its neighboring pulsar PSR J1906+0722 in high energy gamma rays by using nearly six years of archival data of {\it Large Area Telescope} on board {\it Fermi Gamma Ray Space Telescope} (Fermi-LAT). The off-pulse analysis of gamma-ray flux from the location of PSR J1906+0722 reveals an excess emission which is found to be very close to the radio location of 3C 397. Here, we present the preliminary results of this gamma-ray analysis of 3C 397 and PSR J1906+0722.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1705.00426  [pdf] - 1662273
Constraints on dark matter models from the observation of Triangulum-II with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
Comments: It has been accepted for publication in JCAP. 12 pages, 4 tables, 7 figures
Submitted: 2017-05-01, last modified: 2018-04-07
Triangulum-II, a newly discovered dwarf spheroidal galaxy, is a strong candidate for the indirect search of dark matter through the detection of $\gamma$-ray emission that could originate from the pair- annihilation of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs). We here report on the analysis of almost seven years Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope data of Triangulum-II which was taken during its all sky survey operation mode. No excess $\gamma$-ray emission has been detected above 100 MeV from Triangulum-II. We derive the upper limits on $\gamma$-ray flux assuming both the power-law spectra and the spectra related to WIMP annihilation. In this work, we have considered several theoretical WIMP (neutralinos here) models envisioning both thermal and non-thermal production of WIMPs, and put limits on pair-annihilation cross-section of WIMPs to constrain the parameter space related to those theoretical models.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1702.07666  [pdf] - 1581621
Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$ Bubble Chamber
Comments: 6 pages, 6 figures
Submitted: 2017-02-24, last modified: 2017-08-02
New results are reported from the operation of the PICO-60 dark matter detector, a bubble chamber filled with 52 kg of C$_3$F$_8$ located in the SNOLAB underground laboratory. As in previous PICO bubble chambers, PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$ exhibits excellent electron recoil and alpha decay rejection, and the observed multiple-scattering neutron rate indicates a single-scatter neutron background of less than 1 event per month. A blind analysis of an efficiency-corrected 1167-kg-day exposure at a 3.3-keV thermodynamic threshold reveals no single-scattering nuclear recoil candidates, consistent with the predicted background. These results set the most stringent direct-detection constraint to date on the WIMP-proton spin-dependent cross section at 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{-41}$ cm$^2$ for a 30-GeV$\thinspace$c$^{-2}$ WIMP, more than one order of magnitude improvement from previous PICO results.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1611.01499  [pdf] - 1551948
Final Results of the PICASSO Dark Matter Search Experiment
Comments: 24 pages, 7 figures
Submitted: 2016-11-04, last modified: 2017-03-23
The PICASSO dark matter search experiment operated an array of 32 superheated droplet detectors containing 3.0 kg of C$_{4}$F$_{10}$ and collected an exposure of 231.4 kgd at SNOLAB between March 2012 and January 2014. We report on the final results of this experiment which includes for the first time the complete data set and improved analysis techniques including \mbox{acoustic} localization to allow fiducialization and removal of higher activity regions within the detectors. No signal consistent with dark matter was observed. We set limits for spin-dependent interactions on protons of $\sigma_p^{SD}$~=~1.32~$\times$~10$^{-2}$~pb (90\%~C.L.) at a WIMP mass of 20 GeV/c$^{2}$. In the spin-independent sector we exclude cross sections larger than $\sigma_p^{SI}$~=~4.86~$\times$~10$^{-5 }$~pb~(90\% C.L.) in the region around 7 GeV/c$^{2}$. The pioneering efforts of the PICASSO experiment have paved the way forward for a next generation detector incorporating much of this technology and experience into larger mass bubble chambers.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1607.05591  [pdf] - 1553857
Detecting supernova neutrinos with iron and lead detectors
Comments: 11 pages, LaTex, 11 figures, 1 Table; more details added, one new figure added; main conclusions remain unchanged; version accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2016-07-19, last modified: 2017-02-25
Supernova (SN) neutrinos can excite the nuclei of various detector materials beyond their neutron emission thresholds through charged current (CC) and neutral current (NC) interactions. The emitted neutrons, if detected, can be a signal for the supernova event. Here we present the results of our study of SN neutrino detection through the neutron channel in lead ($^{208} {\rm Pb}$) and iron ($^{56} {\rm Fe}$) detectors for realistic neutrino fluxes and energies given by the recent Basel/Darmstadt simulations for a 18 solar mass progenitor SN at a distance of 10 kpc. We find that, in general, the number of neutrons emitted per kTon of detector material for the neutrino luminosities and average energies of the different neutrino species as given by the Basel/Darmstadt simulations are significantly lower than those estimated in previous studies based on the results of earlier SN simulations. At the same time, we highlight the fact that, although the total number of neutrons produced per kTon in a iron detector is more than an order of magnitude lower than that for lead, the dominance of the flavor blind NC events in the case of iron, as opposed to dominance of $\nu_e$ induced CC events in the case of lead, offers a complementarity between the two detector materials so that simultaneous detection of SN neutrinos in a lead and a sufficiently large iron detector suitably instrumented for neutron detection may allow estimating the fraction of the total $\mu$ and $\tau$ flavored neutrinos in the SN neutrino flux and thereby probing the emission mechanism as well as flavor oscillation scenarios of the SN neutrinos.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1610.05151  [pdf] - 1497663
Contributions of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) to the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, C.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, J.; Alfaro, R.; Allafort, A. J.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Araya, M.; Arcaro, C.; Arezki, B.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arqueros, F.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Ashley, M.; Aubert, P.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barcelo, M.; Barkov, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Beshley, V.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattacharyya, W.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Bilinsky, A.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, R.; Bird, T.; Bissaldi, E.; Bitossi, M.; Blanch, O.; Blasi, P.; Blazek, J.; Bockermann, C.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Boix, J.; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonavolontà, C.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnarel, F.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Bowman, L.; Braiding, C.; Brantseg, T.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Bristow, D.; Britto, R.; Brocato, E.; Bron, S.; Brook, P.; Brooks, W.; Brown, A. M.; Brügge, K.; Brun, F.; Brun, P.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cadoux, F.; Tovar, J. Calvo; Cameron, R.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caproni, A.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Cardillo, M.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carquín, E.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Mora, J. Castroviejo; Catalani, F.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cauz, D.; Cavazzani, S.; Cerchiara, P.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Chaleil, T.; Champion, C.; Chatterjee, A.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, K.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colley, J. -M.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Cornat, R.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cuadra, J.; Cumani, P.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Dang, V. T.; Dangeon, L.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; Anjos, R. de Cássia dos; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De Lisio, C.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; De Persio, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Decock, J.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; Delgado, J.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Devin, J.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Diaz, M. A.; Díaz, C.; Dib, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domínguez, A.; Dominik, N.; Dominique, J. -L.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Downes, T.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Drappeau, S.; Drass, H.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Ducci, L.; Dumas, D.; Morå, K. Dundas; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Egorov, A.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsaesser, D.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Escarate, P.; Eschbach, S.; Espinoza, C.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falceta-Goncalves, D.; Falcone, A.; Ramazani, V. Fallah; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Fasola, G.; Favre, Y.; Fede, E.; Fedora, R.; Fedorova, E.; Fegan, S.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Fernández-Barral, A.; Ferrand, G.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiandrini, E.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Fonseca, M. V.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Fornasa, M.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Furniss, A.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galindo, D.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Galvez, J. A.; Gao, S.; Garcia, A.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, L.; Garrido-Ruiz, M.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Gebhardt, B.; Gebyehu, M.; Geffroy, N.; Genolini, B.; Gerard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghislain, P.; Giammaria, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Gieras, T.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Girardot, P.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Gironnet, J.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Gnatyk, R.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Gomez, G.; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; Gora, D.; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Goullon, J.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Graham, J.; Grandi, P.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Griffiths, S.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hagge, L.; Hahn, J.; Hakobyan, H.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Helo, J. C.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hnatyk, B.; Hoang, J.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J.; Hörbe, M.; Horns, D.; Horvath, P.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Huetten, M.; Hughes, G.; Hui, D.; Humensky, T. B.; Hussein, M.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Ikeno, Y.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Inada, T.; Incorvaia, S.; Infante, L.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Iwamura, Y.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, D.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Jones, M.; Josselin, M.; Journet, L.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kamon, H.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Kato, S.; Katz, U.; Kawanaka, N.; Kaye, L.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kimeswenger, S.; Kisaka, S.; Kishida, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Koch, B.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kohri, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Kong, A.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Kossatz, M.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kuklis, M.; Kuroda, H.; Kushida, J.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lahmann, R.; Lakicevic, M.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Lees, J. -P.; Lefaucheur, J.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Linhoff, L.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Louys, M.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luigi, T.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Magniette, F.; Magniez, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Malouf, A.; Maltezos, S.; Malyshev, D.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manganaro, M.; Mangano, S.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, L.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Martynyuk-Lototskyy, K.; Marx, R.; Masetti, N.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Matthews, N.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Merk, M.; Mertsch, P.; Meunier, J. -L.; Meures, T.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michael, T.; Michałowski, J.; Mientjes, P.; Mievre, I.; Mihailidis, A.; Miller, J.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Mohrmann, L.; Molinari, E.; Molyneux, P.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Mooney, D.; Moore, P.; Moralejo, A.; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morris, P.; Morselli, A.; Moscato, F.; Motohashi, D.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar, P.; Munari, M.; Mundell, C.; Mundet, J.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagar, N.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Nanni, J.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nguyen, T. T.; Trung, T. Nguyen; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas-Rosillo, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nikołajuk, M.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Nishiyama, G.; Noda, K.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nöthe, M.; Novosyadlyj, B.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Ocampo, C.; Occhipinti, G.; Ochoa, J. P.; de Bhroithe, A. OFaolain; Oger, R.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okazaki, N.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Öttl, S.; Ovcharov, E.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Pe'er, A.; Peet, S.; Pelat, D.; Pepato, A.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Perri, M.; Persic, M.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Petruk, O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pieloth, D.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pisarski, A.; Pita, S.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Pollo, A.; Porcelli, A.; Porthault, J.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Pressard, K.; Principe, G.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pruteanu, G.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pürckhauer, S.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Ravel, T.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reichardt, I.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reisenegger, A.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Reville, B.; Rezaeian, A.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Prado, R. Ribeiro; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Richtler, T.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Riquelme, M.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivoire, S.; Rizi, V.; Roache, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Romeo, G.; Roncadelli, M.; Rosado, J.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Rubini, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rujopakarn, W.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Sadeh, I.; Saemann, E. O.; Safi-Harb, S.; Saggion, A.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Sakurai, S.; Salamon, A.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Greus, F. Salesa; Salgado, J.; Salina, G.; Salinas, L.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Satalecka, K.; Sato, Y.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schmid, J.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schoorlemmer, H.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schullian, E. -M.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Sciacca, E.; Scuderi, S.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Sergijenko, O.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Shalchi, A.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Shigenaka, A.; Shilon, I.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Simpson, H.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Sliusar, V.; Sliusar, V.; Smith, A.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, R.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Staszak, D.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stephan, M.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Stratta, G.; Straumann, U.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Suomijärvi, T.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, S.; Takata, J.; Takeda, J.; Talbot, G.; Tam, T.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tanigawa, S.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Taylor, A.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrazas, J. C.; Terrier, R.; Terront, D.; Terzic, T.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thornhill, J.; Thoudam, S.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tiengo, A.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tiziani, D.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trichard, C.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagelli, V.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Valentino, M.; Vallania, P.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Vázquez, J. R.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vega, A.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venault, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Veyssiere, C.; Viana, A.; Viaux, N.; Vicha, J.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; von Brand, H.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vrastil, M.; Vu, L. V.; Vuillaume, T.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walstra, T.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warren, D.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J. J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weiner, O.; Weinstein, A.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wilcox, P.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Wilson, N.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Winter, M.; Wischnewski, R.; Witt, E.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamane, N.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yelos, D.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zaborov, D.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zaric, D.; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Zhdanov, V.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Zink, A.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zorn, J.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings for the Gamma 2016, Heidelberg, Germany
Submitted: 2016-10-17
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1601.03729  [pdf] - 1382109
Improved dark matter search results from PICO-2L Run 2
Comments:
Submitted: 2016-01-14, last modified: 2016-03-25
New data are reported from a second run of the 2-liter PICO-2L C$_3$F$_8$ bubble chamber with a total exposure of 129$\,$kg-days at a thermodynamic threshold energy of 3.3$\,$keV. These data show that measures taken to control particulate contamination in the superheated fluid resulted in the absence of the anomalous background events observed in the first run of this bubble chamber. One single nuclear-recoil event was observed in the data, consistent both with the predicted background rate from neutrons and with the observed rate of unambiguous multiple-bubble neutron scattering events. The chamber exhibits the same excellent electron-recoil and alpha decay rejection as was previously reported. These data provide the most stringent direct detection constraints on weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP)-proton spin-dependent scattering to date for WIMP masses $<$ 50$\,$GeV/c$^2$.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1510.07754  [pdf] - 1382070
Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-60 CF$_3$I Bubble Chamber
Comments: v3 to reflect published version
Submitted: 2015-10-26, last modified: 2016-03-03
New data are reported from the operation of the PICO-60 dark matter detector, a bubble chamber filled with 36.8 kg of CF$_3$I and located in the SNOLAB underground laboratory. PICO-60 is the largest bubble chamber to search for dark matter to date. With an analyzed exposure of 92.8 livedays, PICO-60 exhibits the same excellent background rejection observed in smaller bubble chambers. Alpha decays in PICO-60 exhibit frequency-dependent acoustic calorimetry, similar but not identical to that reported recently in a C$_3$F$_8$ bubble chamber. PICO-60 also observes a large population of unknown background events, exhibiting acoustic, spatial, and timing behaviors inconsistent with those expected from a dark matter signal. These behaviors allow for analysis cuts to remove all background events while retaining $48.2\%$ of the exposure. Stringent limits on weakly interacting massive particles interacting via spin-dependent proton and spin-independent processes are set, and most interpretations of the DAMA/LIBRA modulation signal as dark matter interacting with iodine nuclei are ruled out.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1508.05894  [pdf] - 1275515
CTA Contributions to the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2015)
Consortium, The CTA; :; Abchiche, A.; Abeysekara, U.; Abril, Ó.; Acero, F.; Acharya, B. S.; Actis, M.; Agnetta, G.; Aguilar, J. A.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Albert, A.; Alcubierre, M.; Alfaro, R.; Aliu, E.; Allafort, A. J.; Allan, D.; Allekotte, I.; Aloisio, R.; Amans, J. -P.; Amato, E.; Ambrogi, L.; Ambrosi, G.; Ambrosio, M.; Anderson, J.; Anduze, M.; Angüner, E. O.; Antolini, E.; Antonelli, L. A.; Antonucci, M.; Antonuccio, V.; Antoranz, P.; Aramo, C.; Aravantinos, A.; Argan, A.; Armstrong, T.; Arnaldi, H.; Arnold, L.; Arrabito, L.; Arrieta, M.; Arrieta, M.; Asano, K.; Asorey, H. G.; Aune, T.; Singh, C. B.; Babic, A.; Backes, M.; Bais, A.; Bajtlik, S.; Balazs, C.; Balbo, M.; Balis, D.; Balkowski, C.; Ballester, O.; Ballet, J.; Balzer, A.; Bamba, A.; Bandiera, R.; Barber, A.; Barbier, C.; Barceló, M.; Barnacka, A.; de Almeida, U. Barres; Barrio, J. A.; Basso, S.; Bastieri, D.; Bauer, C.; Baushev, A.; Becciani, U.; Becherini, Y.; Tjus, J. Becker; Beckmann, V.; Bednarek, W.; Benbow, W.; Ventura, D. Benedico; Berdugo, J.; Berge, D.; Bernardini, E.; Bernhard, S.; Bernlöhr, K.; Bertucci, B.; Besel, M. -A.; Bhatt, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Bhattachryya, S.; Biasuzzi, B.; Bicknell, G.; Bigongiari, C.; Biland, A.; Billotta, S.; Bilnik, W.; Biondo, B.; Bird, T.; Birsin, E.; Bissaldi, E.; Biteau, J.; Bitossi, M.; Bigas, O. Blanch; Blasi, P.; Boehm, C.; Bogacz, L.; Bogdan, M.; Bohacova, M.; Boisson, C.; Gargallo, J. Boix; Bolmont, J.; Bonanno, G.; Bonardi, A.; Bonifacio, P.; Bonnoli, G.; Borkowski, J.; Bose, R.; Bosnjak, Z.; Bottani, A.; Böttcher, M.; Bousquet, J. -J.; Boutonnet, C.; Bouyjou, F.; Braiding, C.; Brandt, L.; Brau-Nogué, S.; Bregeon, J.; Bretz, T.; Briggs, M.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brisken, W.; Brocato, E.; Brook, P.; Brown, A. M.; Brun, P.; Brunetti, G.; Brunetti, L.; Bruno, P.; Bryan, M.; Buanes, T.; Bucciantini, N.; Buchholtz, G.; Buckley, J.; Bugaev, V.; Bühler, R.; Bulgarelli, A.; Bulik, T.; Burton, M.; Burtovoi, A.; Busetto, G.; Buson, S.; Buss, J.; Byrum, K.; Cameron, R.; Camprecios, J.; Canelli, F.; Canestrari, R.; Cantu, S.; Capalbi, M.; Capasso, M.; Capobianco, G.; Caraveo, P.; Cardenzana, J.; Carius, S.; Carlile, C.; Carmona, E.; Carosi, A.; Carosi, R.; Carr, J.; Carroll, M.; Carter, J.; Carton, P. -H.; Caruso, R.; Casandjian, J. -M.; Casanova, S.; Cascone, E.; Casiraghi, M.; Castellina, A.; Catalano, O.; Catalanotti, S.; Cavazzani, S.; Cazaux, S.; Cefalà, M.; Cerchiara, P.; Cereda, M.; Cerruti, M.; Chabanne, E.; Chadwick, P.; Champion, C.; Chaty, S.; Chaves, R.; Cheimets, P.; Chen, A.; Chen, X.; Chernyakova, M.; Chiappetti, L.; Chikawa, M.; Chinn, D.; Chitnis, V. R.; Cho, N.; Christov, A.; Chudoba, J.; Cieślar, M.; Cillis, A.; Ciocci, M. A.; Clay, R.; Cohen-Tanugi, J.; Colafrancesco, S.; Colin, P.; Colombo, E.; Colome, J.; Colonges, S.; Compin, M.; Conforti, V.; Connaughton, V.; Connell, S.; Conrad, J.; Contreras, J. L.; Coppi, P.; Corbel, S.; Coridian, J.; Corona, P.; Corti, D.; Cortina, J.; Cossio, L.; Costa, A.; Costantini, H.; Cotter, G.; Courty, B.; Covino, S.; Covone, G.; Crimi, G.; Criswell, S. J.; Crocker, R.; Croston, J.; Cusumano, G.; Da Vela, P.; Dale, Ø.; D'Ammando, F.; Dang, D.; Daniel, M.; Davids, I.; Dawson, B.; Dazzi, F.; Costa, B. de Aguiar; De Angelis, A.; Cardoso, R. F. de Araujo; De Caprio, V.; De Cesare, G.; De Franco, A.; De Frondat, F.; Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal; de la Calle, I.; De La Vega, G. A.; Lopez, R. de los Reyes; De Lotto, B.; De Luca, A.; Neto, J. R. T. de Mello; de Naurois, M.; Wilhelmi, E. de Oña; De Palma, F.; de Souza, V.; Decock, G.; Deil, C.; Del Santo, M.; Delagnes, E.; Deleglise, G.; Delgado, C.; della Volpe, D.; Deloye, P.; Depaola, G.; Detournay, M.; Dettlaff, A.; Di Girolamo, T.; Di Giulio, C.; Di Paola, A.; Di Pierro, F.; Di Sciascio, G.; Díaz, C.; Dick, J.; Dickinson, H.; Diebold, S.; Diez, V.; Digel, S.; Dipold, J.; Disset, G.; Distefano, A.; Djannati-Ataï, A.; Doert, M.; Dohmke, M.; Domainko, W.; Dominik, N.; Prester, D. Dominis; Donat, A.; Donnarumma, I.; Dorner, D.; Doro, M.; Dournaux, J. -L.; Doyle, K.; Drake, G.; Dravins, D.; Drury, L.; Dubus, G.; Dumas, D.; Dumm, J.; Durand, D.; D'Urso, D.; Dwarkadas, V.; Dyks, J.; Dyrda, M.; Ebr, J.; Echaniz, J. C.; Edy, E.; Egberts, K.; Egberts, K.; Eger, P.; Einecke, S.; Eisch, J.; Eisenkolb, F.; Eleftheriadis, C.; Elsässer, D.; Emmanoulopoulos, D.; Engelbrecht, C.; Engelhaupt, D.; Ernenwein, J. -P.; Errando, M.; Eschbach, S.; Etchegoyen, A.; Evans, P.; Fairbairn, M.; Falcone, A.; Fantinel, D.; Farakos, K.; Farnier, C.; Farrell, E.; Farrell, S.; Fasola, G.; Fegan, S.; Feinstein, F.; Ferenc, D.; Fernandez, A.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Ferreira, O.; Fesquet, M.; Fetfatzis, P.; Fiasson, A.; Filipčič, A.; Filipovic, M.; Fink, D.; Finley, C.; Finley, J. P.; Finoguenov, A.; Fioretti, V.; Fiorini, M.; Curcoll, R. Firpo; Fleischhack, H.; Flores, H.; Florin, D.; Föhr, C.; Fokitis, E.; Font, L.; Fontaine, G.; Fontes, B.; Forest, F.; Fornasa, M.; Förster, A.; Fortin, P.; Fortson, L.; Fouque, N.; Franckowiak, A.; Franco, F. J.; Frankowski, A.; Frega, N.; Albuquerque, I. Freire Mota; Coromina, L. Freixas; Fresnillo, L.; Fruck, C.; Fuessling, M.; Fugazza, D.; Fujita, Y.; Fukami, S.; Fukazawa, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Fukui, Y.; Funk, S.; Gäbele, W.; Gabici, S.; Gadola, A.; Galante, N.; Gall, D. D.; Gallant, Y.; Galloway, D.; Gallozzi, S.; Gao, S.; Garcia, B.; Gil, R. García; López, R. Garcia; Garczarczyk, M.; Gardiol, D.; Gargano, C.; Gargano, F.; Garozzo, S.; Garrecht, F.; Garrido, D.; Garrido, L.; Gascon, D.; Gaskins, J.; Gaudemard, J.; Gaug, M.; Gaweda, J.; Geffroy, N.; Gérard, L.; Ghalumyan, A.; Ghedina, A.; Ghigo, M.; Ghislain, P.; Giannakaki, E.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giavitto, G.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Gika, V.; Gimenes, R.; Giomi, M.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giovannini, G.; Giro, E.; Giroletti, M.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J. -F.; Godinovic, N.; Goldoni, P.; Berisso, M. Gomez; Vargas, G. A. Gomez; Gonzalez, M. M.; González, A.; González, F.; Muñoz, A. González; Gothe, K. S.; Gotz, D.; Grabarczyk, T.; Graciani, R.; Grandi, P.; Grañena, F.; Granot, J.; Grasseau, G.; Gredig, R.; Green, A. J.; Green, A. M.; Greenshaw, T.; Grenier, I.; Grillo, A.; Grondin, M. -H.; Grube, J.; Grudzinska, M.; Grygorczuk, J.; Guarino, V.; Guberman, D.; Gunji, S.; Gyuk, G.; Hadasch, D.; Hagedorn, A.; Hahn, J.; Hakansson, N.; Heras, N. Hamer; Hanabata, Y.; Hara, S.; Hardcastle, M. J.; Harris, J.; Hassan, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Haubold, T.; Haupt, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Hayashida, M.; Heller, M.; Heller, R.; Henault, F.; Henri, G.; Hermann, G.; Hermel, R.; Llorente, J. Herrera; Herrero, A.; Hervet, O.; Hidaka, N.; Hinton, J.; Hirai, W.; Hirotani, K.; Hoard, D.; Hoffmann, D.; Hofmann, W.; Hofverberg, P.; Holch, T.; Holder, J.; Hooper, S.; Horan, D.; Hörandel, J. R.; Hormigos, S.; Horns, D.; Hose, J.; Houles, J.; Hovatta, T.; Hrabovsky, M.; Hrupec, D.; Huet, J. -M.; Hütten, M.; Humensky, T. B.; Huovelin, J.; Huppert, J. -F.; Iacovacci, M.; Ibarra, A.; Idźkowski, B.; Ikawa, D.; Illa, J. M.; Impiombato, D.; Incorvaia, S.; Inome, Y.; Inoue, S.; Inoue, T.; Inoue, Y.; Iocco, F.; Ioka, K.; Iori, M.; Ishio, K.; Israel, G. L.; Jablonski, C.; Jacholkowska, A.; Jacquemier, J.; Jamrozy, M.; Janecek, P.; Janiak, M.; Jankowsky, F.; Jean, P.; Jeanney, C.; Jegouzo, I.; Jenke, P.; Jimenez, J. J.; Jingo, M.; Jingo, M.; Jocou, L.; Jogler, T.; Johnson, C. A.; Journet, L.; Juffroy, C.; Jung, I.; Kaaret, P. E.; Kagaya, M.; Kakuwa, J.; Kalekin, O.; Kalkuhl, C.; Kankanyan, R.; Karastergiou, A.; Kärcher, K.; Karczewski, M.; Karkar, S.; Karn, P.; Kasperek, J.; Katagiri, H.; Kataoka, J.; Katarzyński, K.; Katz, U.; Kaufmann, S.; Kawanaka, N.; Kawashima, T.; Kazanas, D.; Kelley-Hoskins, N.; Kellner-Leidel, B.; Kendziorra, E.; Kersten, J.; Khélifi, B.; Kieda, D. B.; Kihm, T.; Kisaka, S.; Kissmann, R.; Klepser, S.; Kluźniak, W.; Knapen, J.; Knapp, J.; Knödlseder, J.; Köck, F.; Kocot, J.; Kodakkadan, A.; Kodani, K.; Kohri, K.; Kojima, T.; Kokkotas, K.; Kolitzus, D.; Komin, N.; Kominis, I.; Konno, Y.; Kosack, K.; Koss, G.; Koul, R.; Kowal, G.; Koyama, S.; Kozioł, J.; Kraus, M.; Krause, J.; Krause, M.; Krawzcynski, H.; Krennrich, F.; Kretzschmann, A.; Kruger, P.; Kubo, H.; Kudryavtsev, V.; Mezek, G. Kukec; Kushida, J.; Kuznetsov, A.; La Barbera, A.; La Palombara, N.; La Parola, V.; La Rosa, G.; Laffon, H.; Lagadec, T.; Lahmann, R.; Lalik, K.; Lamanna, G.; Landriu, D.; Landt, H.; Lang, R. G.; Languignon, D.; Lapington, J.; Laporte, P.; Latovski, N.; Law-Green, D.; Fèvre, J. -P. Le; Flour, T. Le; Sidaner, P. Le; Lee, S. -H.; Lee, W. H.; Leffhalm, K.; Leich, H.; de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui; Lelas, D.; Lemière, A.; Lemoine-Goumard, M.; Lenain, J. -P.; Leonard, R.; Leoni, R.; Lessio, L.; Leto, G.; Leveque, A.; Lieunard, B.; Limon, M.; Lindemann, R.; Lindfors, E.; Liolios, A.; Lipniacka, A.; Lockart, H.; Lohse, T.; Loiseau, D.; Łokas, E.; Lombardi, S.; Longo, F.; Longo, G.; Lopatin, A.; Lopez, M.; López-Coto, R.; López-Oramas, A.; Loreggia, D.; Louge, T.; Louis, F.; Lu, C. -C.; Lucarelli, F.; Lucchesi, D.; Lüdecke, H.; Luque-Escamilla, P. L.; Luz, O.; Lyard, E.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccarone, T. J.; Mach, E.; Madejski, G. M.; Madonna, A.; Mahabir, M.; Maier, G.; Majumdar, P.; Makariev, M.; Malaguti, G.; Malaspina, G.; Mallot, A. K.; Maltezos, S.; Mancilla, A.; Mandat, D.; Maneva, G.; Manigot, P.; Mankushiyil, N.; Mannheim, K.; Maragos, N.; Marano, D.; Marchegiani, P.; Marcomini, J. A.; Marcowith, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Markoff, S.; Marszałek, A.; Martens, C.; Martí, J.; Martin, J. -M.; Martin, P.; Martínez, G.; Martínez, M.; Martínez, O.; Marx, R.; Massimino, P.; Mastichiadis, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Mastropietro, M.; Masuda, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Matsuoka, S.; Mattiazzo, S.; Maurin, G.; Maxted, N.; Maya, J.; Mayer, M.; Mazin, D.; Mazureau, E.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Comb, L. Mc; McCann, A.; McCubbin, N.; McHardy, I.; McKay, R.; McKinney, K.; Meagher, K.; Medina, C.; Mehrez, F.; Melioli, C.; Melkumyan, D.; Melo, D.; Melse, T.; Mereghetti, S.; Mertsch, P.; Meyer, M.; Meyrelles, J. L.; Miccichè, A.; Michałowski, J.; Micolon, P.; Mientjes, P.; Mignot, S.; Mihailidis, A.; Mineo, T.; Minuti, M.; Mirabal, N.; Mirabel, F.; Miranda, J. M.; Mirzoyan, R.; Mistò, A.; Mitchell, A.; Mizuno, T.; Moderski, R.; Mognet, I.; Mohammed, M.; Moharana, R.; Molinari, E.; Monmarthe, E.; Monnier, G.; Montaruli, T.; Monte, C.; Monteiro, I.; Moore, P.; Olaizola, A. Moralejo; Morello, C.; Moretti, E.; Mori, K.; Morlino, G.; Morselli, A.; Mottez, F.; Moudden, Y.; Moulin, E.; Mrusek, I.; Mueller, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Munar-Adrover, P.; Mundell, C.; Muraishi, H.; Murase, K.; Muronga, A.; Murphy, A.; Nagataki, S.; Nagayoshi, T.; Nagesh, B. K.; Naito, T.; Nakajima, D.; Nakamori, T.; Nakayama, K.; Naumann, D.; Nayman, P.; Nellen, L.; Nemmen, R.; Neronov, A.; Neustroev, V.; Neyroud, N.; Nguyen, T.; Nicastro, L.; Nicolau-Kukliński, J.; Niederwanger, F.; Niedźwiecki, A.; Niemiec, J.; Nieto, D.; Nievas, M.; Nikolaidis, A.; Nishijima, K.; Nishikawa, K. -I.; Noda, K.; Nogues, L.; Nolan, S.; Northrop, R.; Nosek, D.; Nozka, L.; Nunio, F.; Oakes, L.; O'Brien, P.; Occhipinti, G.; de Bhroithe, A. O'Faolain; Ogino, M.; Ohira, Y.; Ohishi, M.; Ohm, S.; Ohoka, H.; Okumura, A.; Olive, J. -F.; Olszowski, D.; Ong, R. A.; Ono, S.; Orienti, M.; Orito, R.; Orlati, A.; Orlati, A.; Osborne, J.; Ostrowski, M.; Otero, L. A.; Ottaway, D.; Otte, N.; Oya, I.; Ozieblo, A.; Padovani, M.; Pagano, I.; Paiano, S.; Paizis, A.; Palacio, J.; Palatka, M.; Pallotta, J.; Panagiotidis, K.; Panazol, J. -L.; Paneque, D.; Panter, M.; Panzera, M. R.; Paoletti, R.; Paolillo, M.; Papayannis, A.; Papyan, G.; Paravac, A.; Paredes, J. M.; Pareschi, G.; Park, N.; Parsons, D.; Paśko, P.; Pavy, S.; Arribas, M. Paz; Pech, M.; Peck, A.; Pedaletti, G.; Peet, S.; Pelassa, V.; Pelat, D.; Peres, C.; Perez, M. d. C.; Perri, L.; Persic, M.; Petrashyk, A.; Petrucci, P. -O.; Peyaud, B.; Pfeifer, M.; Pfeiffer, G.; Piano, G.; Pichel, A.; Pieloth, D.; Pierbattista, M.; Pierre, E.; de Pinho, F. Pinto; García, C. Pio; Piret, Y.; Pita, S.; Planes, A.; Platino, M.; Platos, Ł.; Platzer, R.; Podkladkin, S.; Pogosyan, L.; Pohl, M.; Poinsignon, P.; Ponz, J. D.; Porcelli, A.; Potter, W.; Poulios, S.; Poutanen, J.; Prandini, E.; Prast, J.; Preece, R.; Profeti, F.; Prokhorov, D.; Prokoph, H.; Prouza, M.; Proyetti, M.; Pruchniewicz, R.; Pueschel, E.; Pühlhofer, G.; Puljak, I.; Punch, M.; Pyzioł, R.; Queiroz, F.; Quel, E. J.; Quinn, J.; Quirrenbach, A.; Racero, E.; Räck, T.; Rafalski, J.; Rafighi, I.; Rainò, S.; Rajda, P. J.; Rameez, M.; Rando, R.; Rannot, R. C.; Rataj, M.; Rateau, S.; Ravel, T.; Ravignani, D.; Razzaque, S.; Reardon, P.; Reimann, O.; Reimer, A.; Reimer, O.; Reitberger, K.; Renaud, M.; Renner, S.; Reposeur, T.; Rettig, R.; Reville, B.; Rhode, W.; Ribeiro, D.; Ribó, M.; Richards, G.; Richer, M. G.; Rico, J.; Ridky, J.; Rieger, F.; Ringegni, P.; Ristori, P. R.; Rivière, A.; Rivoire, S.; Roache, E.; Rodeghiero, G.; Rodriguez, J.; Fernandez, G. Rodriguez; Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez; Rogers, T.; Rojas, G.; Romano, P.; Rodriguez, M. P. Romay; Romeo, G.; Romero, G. E.; Roncadelli, M.; Rose, J.; Rosen, S.; Lees, S. Rosier; Ross, D.; Rossiter, P.; Rouaix, G.; Rousselle, J.; Rovero, A. C.; Rowell, G.; Roy, F.; Royer, S.; Różańska, A.; Rudak, B.; Rugliancich, A.; Rulten, C.; Rupiński, M.; Russo, F.; Rutkowski, K.; Saavedra, O.; Sabatini, S.; Sacco, B.; Saemann, E. O.; Saggion, A.; Saha, L.; Sahakian, V.; Saito, K.; Saito, T.; Sakaki, N.; Salega, M.; Salek, D.; Salgado, J.; Salini, A.; Sanchez, D.; Sanchez, F.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sandaker, H.; Sandoval, A.; Sangiorgi, P.; Sanguillon, M.; Sano, H.; Santander, M.; Santangelo, A.; Santos, E. M.; Santos-Lima, R.; Sanuy, A.; Sapozhnikov, L.; Sarkar, S.; Satalecka, K.; Savalle, R.; Sawada, M.; Sayède, F.; Schafer, J.; Schanne, S.; Schanz, T.; Schioppa, E. J.; Schlenstedt, S.; Schlickeiser, R.; Schmidt, T.; Schmoll, J.; Schneider, M.; Schovanek, P.; Schubert, A.; Schultz, C.; Schultze, J.; Schulz, A.; Schulz, S.; Schure, K.; Schussler, F.; Schwab, T.; Schwanke, U.; Schwarz, J.; Schweizer, T.; Schwemmer, S.; Schwendicke, U.; Schwerdt, C.; Segreto, A.; Seiradakis, J. -H.; Sembroski, G. H.; Semikoz, D.; Serre, N.; Servillat, M.; Seweryn, K.; Shafi, N.; Sharma, M.; Shayduk, M.; Shellard, R. C.; Shibata, T.; Pandeni, K. Shiningayamwe; Shukla, A.; Shum, E.; Sidoli, L.; Sidz, M.; Sieiro, J.; Siejkowski, H.; Silk, J.; Sillanpää, A.; Simone, D.; Singh, B. B.; Sinha, A.; Sironi, G.; Sitarek, J.; Sizun, P.; Slyusar, V.; Smith, A.; Smith, J.; Sobczyńska, D.; Sol, H.; Sottile, G.; Sowiński, M.; Spanier, F.; Spengler, G.; Spiga, D.; Stadler, R.; Stahl, O.; Stamatescu, V.; Stamerra, A.; Stanič, S.; Starling, R.; Stawarz, Ł.; Steenkamp, R.; Stefanik, S.; Stegmann, C.; Steiner, S.; Stella, C.; Stergioulas, N.; Sternberger, R.; Sterzel, M.; Stevenson, B.; Stinzing, F.; Stodulska, M.; Stodulski, M.; Stolarczyk, T.; Straumann, U.; Strazzeri, E.; Stringhetti, L.; Strzys, M.; Stuik, R.; Sulanke, K. -H.; Supanitsky, A. D.; Suric, T.; Sushch, I.; Sutcliffe, P.; Sykes, J.; Szanecki, M.; Szepieniec, T.; Szwarnog, P.; Tacchini, A.; Tachihara, K.; Tagliaferri, G.; Tajima, H.; Takahashi, H.; Takahashi, K.; Takahashi, M.; Takalo, L.; Takami, H.; Talbot, G.; Tammi, J.; Tanaka, M.; Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tanci, C.; Tarantino, E.; Tavani, M.; Tavecchio, F.; Tavernet, J. -P.; Tayabaly, K.; Tejedor, L. A.; Telezhinsky, I.; Temme, F.; Temnikov, P.; Tenzer, C.; Terada, Y.; Terrier, R.; Tescaro, D.; Teshima, M.; Testa, V.; Tezier, D.; Thayer, J.; Thomas, V.; Thornhill, J.; Thuermann, D.; Tibaldo, L.; Tibolla, O.; Tiengo, A.; Tijsseling, G.; Timpanaro, M. C.; Tluczykont, M.; Peixoto, C. J. Todero; Tokanai, F.; Tokarz, M.; Toma, K.; Toma, K.; Tomastik, J.; Tomono, Y.; Tonachini, A.; Tonev, D.; Torii, K.; Tornikoski, M.; Torres, D. F.; Torres, M.; Torresi, E.; Toscano, S.; Toso, G.; Tosti, G.; Totani, T.; Tothill, N.; Toussenel, F.; Tovmassian, G.; Townsley, C.; Toyama, T.; Travnicek, P.; Trifoglio, M.; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Pujadas, I. Troyano; Trzeciak, M.; Tsinganos, K.; Tsubone, Y.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Tsujimoto, S.; Tsuru, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Umana, G.; Umetsu, Y.; Underwood, C.; Upadhya, S. S.; Uslenghi, M.; Vagnetti, F.; Valdes-Galicia, J.; Vallania, P.; Vallejo, G.; Valore, L.; van Driel, W.; van Eldik, C.; van Soelen, B.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Vanderwalt, J.; Vasileiadis, G.; Vassiliev, V.; Acosta, M. L. Vázquez; Vecchi, M.; Vegas, I.; Veitch, P.; Venema, L.; Venter, C.; Vercellone, S.; Vergani, S.; Verma, K.; Verzi, V.; Vettolani, G. P.; Viana, A.; Vicha, J.; Videla, M.; Vigorito, C.; Vincent, P.; Vincent, S.; Vink, J.; Vittorini, V.; Vlahakis, N.; Vlahos, L.; Voelk, H.; Vogler, P.; Voisin, V.; Vollhardt, A.; Volpicelli, A.; Vorobiov, S.; Vovk, I.; Vu, L. V.; Wagner, R.; Wagner, R. M.; Wagner, R. G.; Wagner, S. J.; Wakely, S. P.; Walter, R.; Walther, T.; Ward, J. E.; Ward, M.; Warda, K.; Warwick, R.; Wassberg, S.; Watson, J.; Wawer, P.; Wawrzaszek, R.; Webb, N.; Wegner, P.; Weinstein, A.; Weitzel, Q.; Wells, R.; Werner, F.; Werner, M.; Wetteskind, H.; White, M.; White, R.; Więcek, M.; Wierzcholska, A.; Wiesand, S.; Wijers, R.; Wild, N.; Wilhelm, A.; Wilkinson, M.; Will, M.; Williams, D. A.; Williams, J. T.; Willingale, R.; Winde, M.; Winiarski, K.; Winkler, H.; Wischnewski, R.; Wojcik, P.; Wolf, D.; Wood, M.; Wörnlein, A.; Wu, E.; Wu, T.; Yadav, K. K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamazaki, R.; Yanagita, S.; Yang, L.; Yebras, J. M.; Yelos, D.; Yeung, W.; Yoshida, A.; Yoshida, T.; Yoshiike, S.; Yoshikoshi, T.; Yu, P.; Zabalza, V.; Zabalza, V.; Zacharias, M.; Zaharijas, G.; Zajczyk, A.; Zampieri, L.; Zandanel, F.; Zanin, R.; Sanchez, R. Zanmar; Zavrtanik, D.; Zavrtanik, M.; Zdziarski, A.; Zech, A.; Zechlin, H.; Zhao, A.; Ziegler, A.; Ziemann, J.; Ziętara, K.; Ziółkowski, J.; Zitelli, V.; Zoli, A.; Zurbach, C.; Żychowski, P.
Comments: Index of CTA conference proceedings at the ICRC2015, The Hague (The Netherlands). v1: placeholder with no arXiv links yet, to be replaced once individual contributions have been all submitted; v2: final with arXiv links to all CTA contributions and full author list
Submitted: 2015-08-24, last modified: 2015-09-11
List of contributions from the CTA Consortium presented at the 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 30 July - 6 August 2015, The Hague, The Netherlands.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1503.00008  [pdf] - 1238863
Dark Matter Search Results from the PICO-2L C$_3$F$_8$ Bubble Chamber
Comments: 6 pages, 6 figures, v2 to match published version
Submitted: 2015-02-27, last modified: 2015-06-29
New data are reported from the operation of a 2-liter C$_3$F$_8$ bubble chamber in the 2100 meter deep SNOLAB underground laboratory, with a total exposure of 211.5 kg-days at four different recoil energy thresholds ranging from 3.2 keV to 8.1 keV. These data show that C3F8 provides excellent electron recoil and alpha rejection capabilities at very low thresholds, including the first observation of a dependence of acoustic signal on alpha energy. Twelve single nuclear recoil event candidates were observed during the run. The candidate events exhibit timing characteristics that are not consistent with the hypothesis of a uniform time distribution, and no evidence for a dark matter signal is claimed. These data provide the most sensitive direct detection constraints on WIMP-proton spin-dependent scattering to date, with significant sensitivity at low WIMP masses for spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1402.4309  [pdf] - 1645809
Constraints on the synchrotron self-Compton mechanism of TeV gamma ray emission from the Milagro TeV source MGRO J2019+37 within the pulsar wind nebula scenario
Comments: Replaced by revised version; 14 pages Latex, 2 Figures; title and abstract slightly changed to more faithfully reflect the content of the paper; text substantially modified and Figures changed; main conclusions remain unchanged; version accepted for publication in JHEAP
Submitted: 2014-02-18, last modified: 2015-05-22
Origin of the TeV gamma ray emission from MGRO J2019+37 discovered by the Milagro experiment is investigated within the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) scenario using multiwavelength information on sources suggested to be associated with this object. We find that the synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) mechanism of origin of the observed TeV gamma rays within the PWN scenario is severely constrained by the upper limit on the radio flux from the region around MGRO J2019+37 given by the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) as well as by the x-ray flux upper limit from SWIFT/XRT. Specifically, for the SSC mechanism to explain the observed TeV flux from MGRO J2019+37 without violating the GMRT and/or Swift/XRT flux upper limits in the radio and x-ray regions, respectively, the emission region must be extremely compact with the characteristic size of the emission region restricted to $\lsim{\mathcal O}(10^{-4}\pc)$ for an assumed distance of $\sim$ few kpc to the source. This is at least four orders of magnitude less than the characteristic size of the emission region typically invoked in explaining the TeV emission through the SSC mechanism within the PWN scenario. On the other hand, inverse Compton (IC) scattering of the nebular high energy electrons on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons can, for reasonable ranges of values of various parameters, explain the observed TeV flux without violating the GMRT and/or SWIFT/XRT flux bounds.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1503.02706  [pdf] - 946306
Multi-frequency, Multi-Epoch Study of Mrk 501: Hints for a two-component nature of the emission
Comments: Published in Astrophysical Journal (ApJ)
Submitted: 2015-03-09
Since the detection of very high energy (VHE) $\gamma$-rays from Mrk 501, its broad band emission of radiation was mostly and quite effectively modeled using one zone emission scenario. However, broadband spectral and flux variability studies enabled by the multiwavelength campaigns carried out during the recent years have revealed rather complex behavior of Mrk 501. The observed emission from Mrk 501 could be due to a complex superposition of multiple emission zones. Moreover new evidences of detection of very hard intrinsic $\gamma$-ray spectra obtained from {\it Fermi}--LAT observations have challenged the theories about origin of VHE $\gamma$-rays. Our studies based on {\it Fermi}--LAT data indicate the existence of two separate components in the spectrum, one for low energy $\gamma$-rays and the other for high energy $\gamma$-rays. Using multiwaveband data from several ground and space based instruments, in addition to HAGAR data, the spectral energy distribution of Mrk~501 is obtained for various flux states observed during 2011. In the present work, this observed broadband spectral energy distribution is reproduced with a leptonic, multi-zone Synchrotron Self-Compton model.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1310.2659  [pdf] - 1179848
Rotation Curve of the Milky Way out to $\sim$ 200 kpc
Comments: 16 pages, 12 Figures; minor changes in Abstract, text, and some Figures; one reference added; main results unchanged; version accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2013-10-09, last modified: 2014-02-26
The rotation curve (RC) of our Galaxy, the Milky Way, is constructed starting from its very inner regions (few hundred pc) out to a large Galactocentric distance of $\sim 200$ kpc using kinematical data on a variety of tracer objects moving in the gravitational potential of the Galaxy, without assuming any theoretical models of the visible and dark matter components of the Galaxy. We study the effect on the RC due to the uncertainties in the values of the Galactic Constants (GCs) $R_\odot$ and $V_\odot$ (these being the sun's distance from and circular rotation speed around the Galactic center, respectively) and the velocity anisotropy parameter $\beta$ of the halo tracer objects used for deriving the RC at large Galactocentric distances. The resulting RC in the disk region is found to depend significantly on the choice of the GCs, while the dominant uncertainty in the RC at large distances beyond the stellar disk comes from the uncertainty in the value of $\beta$. In general we find that the mean RC steadily declines at distances beyond $\sim 60$ kpc, independently of the value of $\beta$. Also, at a given radius, the circular speed is lower for larger values of $\beta$ (i.e., for more radially biased velocity anisotropy). Considering that the largest possible value of $\beta$ is unity, which corresponds to stellar orbits being purely radial, our results for the case of $\beta=1$ give a lower limit to the total mass of the Galaxy within $\sim 200$ kpc, $M(200 {\rm kpc}) \gsim (6.8\pm4.1) \times 10^{11} M_\odot$, independently of any model of the dark matter halo of the Galaxy.
[18]  oai:arXiv.org:1309.4492  [pdf] - 779593
Observing supernova neutrino light curve in future dark matter detectors
Comments: 8 pages, 6 figuers
Submitted: 2013-09-17
The possibility of observing supernova (SN) neutrinos through the process of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CENNS) in future ton scale detectors designed primarily for direct detection of dark matter is investigated. In particular, we focus on the possibility of distinguishing the various phases of the SN neutrino emission. The neutrino emission rates from the recent long term Basel/Darmstadt simulations are used to calculate the expected event rates. The recent state-of-the-art SN simulations predict closer fluxes among different neutrino flavors and lower average energies compared to the earlier simulation models. We find that our estimated total event rates are typically a factor of two lower than those predicted using older simulation models. We further find that, with optimistic assumptions on the detector's time resolution (~ 10 ms) and energy threshold (~ 0.1 keV), the neutrinos associated with the accretion phase of the SN can in principle be demarcated out with, for example, a 10-ton Xe detector, although distinguishing the neutrinos associated with the neutronization burst phase of the explosion would typically require several tens of ton detectors. We also comment on the possibility of studying the properties of non-electron flavor neutrinos from the CENNS of SN neutrinos.
[19]  oai:arXiv.org:1210.2328  [pdf] - 657703
Deriving the velocity distribution of Galactic Dark Matter particles from rotation curve data
Comments: Latex 5 pages, 5 Figures; revised version -- title changed, typos fixed, Figure 3 changed for better visualization, all Figures now in black and white, results and conclusions unchanged; version accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2012-10-08, last modified: 2013-04-05
The velocity distribution function (VDF) of the hypothetical Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), currently the most favored candidate for the Dark Matter (DM) in the Galaxy, is determined directly from the circular speed ("rotation") curve data of the Galaxy assuming isotropic VDF. This is done by "inverting" --- using Eddington's method --- the Navarro-Frenk-White universal density profile of the DM halo of the Galaxy, the parameters of which are determined, by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique, from a recently compiled set of observational data on the Galaxy's rotation curve extended to distances well beyond the visible edge of the disk of the Galaxy. The derived most-likely local isotropic VDF strongly differs from the Maxwellian form assumed in the "Standard Halo Model" (SHM) customarily used in the analysis of the results of WIMP direct-detection experiments. A parametrized (non-Maxwellian) form of the derived most-likely local VDF is given. The astrophysical "g-factor" that determines the effect of the WIMP VDF on the expected event rate in a direct-detection experiment can be lower for the derived most-likely VDF than that for the best Maxwellian fit to it by as much two orders of magnitude at the lowest WIMP mass threshold of a typical experiment.
[20]  oai:arXiv.org:1106.5711  [pdf] - 765708
Neutrinos from WIMP annihilation in the Sun : Implications of a self-consistent model of the Milky Way's dark matter halo
Comments: Replaced with revised version; Latest published results from Super-Kamiokande incorporated; quantitative limits on the branching fractions of various WIMP annihilation channels become more stringent by factors of 3 - 4; references added; overall conclusions unchanged; 17 pages, Latex, 6 Figures, accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2011-06-28, last modified: 2012-05-21
Upper limits on the spin-independent (SI) as well as spin-dependent (SD) elastic scattering cross sections of WIMPs with protons, imposed by the Super-Kamiokande (S-K) upper limit on the neutrino flux from WIMP annihilation in the Sun, and their compatibility with the "DAMA-compatible" regions of the WIMP parameter space within which the annual modulation signal observed by the DAMA/LIBRA experiment is compatible with the null results of other direct detection experiments, are studied within the frame work of a self-consistent model of the finite-size dark matter (DM) halo of the Galaxy, the parameters of which are determined by a fit to the rotation curve data of the Galaxy. We find that the S-K implied upper limits on the WIMP-proton elastic cross section as a function of WIMP mass impose stringent restrictions on the branching fractions of the various WIMP annihilation channels. For SI interaction, while the S-K upper limits are consistent with the DAMA-compatible region of the WIMP parameter space if the WIMPs annihilate dominantly to $\bbarb$\ and/or $\cbarc$, portions of the DAMA-compatible region can be excluded if WIMP annihilations to $\tautau$ and $\nu\anu$ occur at larger than ~ 10% and 0.1% levels, respectively. For SD interaction, the restrictions on the possible annihilation channels are much more stringent, essentially ruling out the DAMA-compatible region of the WIMP parameter space if the relatively low-mass ($\sim$ 2 -- 20 GeV) WIMPs under consideration annihilate predominantly to any mixture of $\bbarb$, \ $\cbarc$, \ $\tautau$, \ and $\nu\anu$ final states.
[21]  oai:arXiv.org:1203.3850  [pdf] - 1117370
Multiwavelength study of TeV Blazar Mrk421 during giant flare
Comments: 9 pages, 10 figures, Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics (A & A)
Submitted: 2012-03-17
Context: The nearby (z=0.031) TeV blazar Mrk421 was reported to be in a high state of flux activity since November, 2009. Aims: To investigate possible changes in the physical parameters of Mrk421 during its high state of activity using multiwavelength data. Methods: We have observed this source in bright state using High Altitude GAmma Ray (HAGAR) telescope array at energies above 250 GeV during February 13 - 19, 2010. Optical, X-ray and gamma-ray archival data are also used to obtain the SEDs and light curves. Results: Mrk421 was found to undergo one of its brightest flaring episodes on February 17, 2010 by various observations in X-rays and gamma-rays. HAGAR observations during February 13 - 19, 2010 at the energies above 250 GeV show an enhancement in the flux level, with a maximum flux of ~ 7 Crab units being detected on February 17, 2010. We present the spectral energy distributions during this flaring episode and investigate the correlation of the variability in X-ray and gamma-ray bands. Conclusions: Our multiwavelength study suggests that the flare detected during February 16 and 17, 2010 could arise due to a passing shock in the jet.
[22]  oai:arXiv.org:1110.6795  [pdf] - 431915
Multiwavelength study of TeV Blazar Mrk421 during giant flare and observations of TeV AGNs with HAGAR
Comments: 2011 Fermi Symposium proceedings - eConf C110509
Submitted: 2011-10-31
The radiation mechanism of very high energy $\gamma$-ray emission from blazars and crucial parameters like magnetic field, and size of the emitting region are not well understood yet. To understand the above mentioned properties of blazars, we observed five nearby TeV $\gamma$-ray emitting blazars (Mrk421, Mrk501, 1ES2344+514, 1ES1218+304 and 3C454.3) and one radio galaxy (M87) using the High Altitude GAmma Ray (HAGAR) telescope. HAGAR is an array of seven telescopes located at Hanle, India to detect Cherenkov light caused by extensive air showers initiated by $\gamma$-rays. Mrk421 was observed to undergo one of its brightest flaring episodes on 2010 February 17, and detected by various experiments in X-rays and $\gamma$- rays. HAGAR observations of this source during 2010 February 13 - 19, in the energies above 250 GeV show an enhancement in the flux level, with a flux of 6-7 Crab units being detected on 2010 February 17. We present the spectral energy distribution of the source during this flaring episode. In addition to this, the analysis procedure to extract $\gamma$-ray signal from HAGAR data is discussed and preliminary results on all the AGNs are presented.
[23]  oai:arXiv.org:1006.5588  [pdf] - 765707
Direct detection of WIMPs : Implications of a self-consistent truncated isothermal model of the Milky Way's dark matter halo
Comments: Title shortened, minor changes in abstract and text; results unchanged; 20 pages, Latex, 7 figures; version accepted for publication in JCAP
Submitted: 2010-06-29, last modified: 2010-08-17
Direct detection of Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) candidates of Dark Matter (DM) is studied within the context of a self-consistent truncated isothermal model of the finite-size dark halo of the Galaxy based on the "King model" of the phase space distribution function of collisionless DM particles. Our halo model takes into account the modifications of the phase-space structure of the halo due to the gravitational influence of the observed visible matter in a self-consistent manner. The parameters of the halo model are determined by a fit to a recently determined circular rotation curve of the Galaxy that extends up to $\sim$ 60 kpc. Unlike in the Standard Halo Model (SHM) customarily used in the analysis of the results of WIMP direct detection experiments, the velocity distribution of the WIMPs in our model is non-Maxwellian with a cut-off at a maximum velocity that is self-consistently determined by the model itself. For our halo model that provides the best fit to the rotation curve data, the 90% C.L. upper limit on the WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross section from the recent results of the CDMS-II experiment, for example, is $\sim 5.3\times10^{-8}\pb$ at a WIMP mass of $\sim$ 71 GeV. We also find, using the original 2-bin annual modulation amplitude data of the DAMA experiment, that there exists a range of small WIMP masses, typically $\sim$ 2 -- 16 GeV, within which DAMA collaboration's claimed annual modulation signal purportedly due to WIMPs is compatible with the null results of other experiments. These results strengthen the possibility of low-mass ($\lsim 10\gev$) WIMPs as a candidate for dark matter as indicated by several earlier studies performed within the context of the SHM. A more rigorous analysis using DAMA bins over smaller intervals should be able to better constrain the "DAMA regions" in the WIMP parameter space within the context of our model.
[24]  oai:arXiv.org:0710.5922  [pdf] - 6589
Upper Limit on the Cosmic Gamma-Ray Burst Rate from High Energy Diffuse Neutrino Background
Comments: Two references added, an overall constant numerical factor corrected, Figures and relevant portions of abstract and main text slightly changed, main conclusions unchanged, 18 pages Latex with 4 Figures, version accepted for publication in PRD
Submitted: 2007-10-31, last modified: 2008-01-29
We derive upper limits on the ratio $f_{GRB/CCSN}(z) \equiv R_{GRB}(z)/R_{CCSN}(z) \equiv f_{GRB/CCSN}(0)(1+z)^\alpha$, the ratio of the rate, $R_{GRB}$, of long-duration Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) to the rate, $R_{CCSN}$, of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) in the Universe ($z$ being the cosmological redshift and $\alpha\geq 0$), by using the upper limit on the diffuse TeV--PeV neutrino background given by the AMANDA-II experiment in the South Pole, under the assumption that GRBs are sources of TeV--PeV neutrinos produced from decay of charged pions produced in $p\gamma$ interaction of protons accelerated to ultrahigh energies at internal shocks within GRB jets. For the assumed ``concordance model'' of cosmic star formation rate, $R_{SF}$, with $R_{CCSN}(z) \propto R_{SF}(z)$, our conservative upper limits are $f_{GRB/CCSN}(0)\leq 5.0\times10^{-3}$ for $\alpha=0$, and $f_{GRB/CCSN}(0)\leq 1.1\times10^{-3}$ for $\alpha=2$, for example. These limits are already comparable to (and, for $\alpha\geq 1$ already more restrictive than) the current upper limit on this ratio inferred from other astronomical considerations, thus providing a useful independent probe of and constraint on the CCSN-GRB connection. Non-detection of a diffuse TeV--PeV neutrino background by the up-coming IceCube detector in the South pole after three years of operation, for example, will bring down the upper limit on $f_{GRB/CCSN}(0)$ to below few $\times10^{-5}$ level, while a detection will confirm the hypothesis of proton acceleration to ultrahigh energies in GRBs and will potentially also yield the true rate of occurrence of these events in the Universe.
[25]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703262  [pdf] - 90071
Dynamics of dwarf-spheroidals and the dark matter halo of the Galaxy
Comments: 38 pages latex, includes 16 ps figs, uses elsart.cls, To appear in New Astronomy
Submitted: 2007-03-12
Based on the observed paucity of the dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellites of the Milky Way at small Galactocentric distances, we put forward the hypothesis that subsequent to the formation of the Milky Way and its satellites, those dSphs that had orbits with small perigalacticons were tidally disrupted, leaving behind a population that now has a relatively larger value of its average perigalacticon to apogalacticon ratio and consequently a larger value of its r.m.s. transverse to radial velocities ratio compared to their values at the time of formation of the dSphs. We analyze the implications of this hypothesis for the phase space distribution of the dSphs and that of the dark matter (DM) halo of the Galaxy within the context of a self-consistent model in which the functional form of the phase space distribution of DM particles follows the King model i.e. the `lowered isothermal' distribution and the potential of the Galaxy is determined self-consistently by including the gravitational cross-coupling between visible matter and DM particles. This analysis, coupled with virial arguments, yields an estimate of $\gsim$ 270 km/s for the circular velocity of any test object at galactocentric distances of $\sim$ 100 kpc, the typical distances of the dSphs. The corresponding self-consistent values of the relevant DM halo model parameters, namely, the local (i.e., the solar neighbourhood) values of the DM density and velocity dispersion in the King model and its truncation radius, are estimated to be $\sim$ 0.3 GeV/cm^3, >350 km/s and $\gsim$ 150 kpc, respectively. Similar self-consistent studies with other possible forms of the DM distribution function will be useful in assessing the robustness of our estimates of the Galaxy's DM halo parameters.
[26]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0512350  [pdf] - 115207
Baryogenesis via Leptogenesis in presence of cosmic strings
Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures, discussions added, journal version, to appear in NPB
Submitted: 2005-12-28, last modified: 2006-06-26
We study the effect on leptogenesis due to $B-L$ cosmic strings of a $U(1)_{B-L}$ extension of the Standard Model. The disappearance of closed loops of $B-L$ cosmic strings can produce heavy right handed neutrinos, $N_R$'s, whose CP-asymmetric decay in out-of-thermal equilibrium condition can give rise to a net lepton ($L$) asymmetry which is then converted, due to sphaleron transitions, to a Baryon ($B$) asymmetry. This is studied by using the relevant Boltzmann equations and including the effects of both thermal and string generated non-thermal $N_R$'s. We explore the parameter region spanned by the effective light neutrino mass parameter $\tilde{m}_1$, the mass $M_1$ of the lightest of the heavy right-handed neutrinos (or equivalently the Yukawa coupling $h_1$) and the scale of $B-L$ symmetry breaking, $\eta_{B-L}$, and show that there exist ranges of values of these parameters, in particular with $\eta_{B-L} > 10^{11}\gev$ and $h_1\gsim 0.01$, for which the cosmic string generated non-thermal $N_R$'s can give the dominant contribution to, and indeed produce, the observed Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe when the purely thermal leptogenesis mechanism is not sufficient. We also discuss how, depending on the values of $\eta_{B-L}$, $\tilde{m}_1$ and $h_1$, our results lead to upper bounds on $\sin\delta$, where $\delta$ is the the CP violating phase that determines the CP asymmetry in the decay of the heavy right handed neutrino responsible for generating the $L$-asymmetry.
[27]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0501191  [pdf] - 114940
Probing neutrino mixing angles with ultrahigh energy neutrino telescopes
Comments: Replaced with revised version. Crucial change in the title (word "running" dropped). Abstract and content changed. Motivational basis of the previous version was wrong (Renormalization Group running of neutrino mixing angles does not apply to on-shell neutrinos). The calculations and main results, however, remain correct. 4 pages, Revtex, 2 ps figures, submitted to PRL
Submitted: 2005-01-20, last modified: 2005-01-24
We point out that detecting $\nuebar$'s from distant astrophysical sources with the up-coming and future neutrino telescopes using the Glashow resonance channel $\nuebar e^{-}\to W^{-} \to$ anything, which occurs over a small energy window around the $\nuebar$ energy of $\sim6.3\pev$, offers a new way of measuring or setting limits on neutrino mixing angles, in particular the angle $\theta_{12}$, thereby providing an independent experimental probe of neutrino mixing angles. We also discuss how this exercise may throw light on the nature of the neutrino production mechanism in individual astrophysical sources.
[28]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0406054  [pdf] - 114763
B-L Cosmic strings and Baryogenesis
Comments: match with the published version
Submitted: 2004-06-04, last modified: 2004-11-02
Cosmic strings arising from breaking of the $U(1)_{B-L}$ gauge symmetry that occurs in a wide variety of unified models can carry zero modes of heavy Majorana neutrinos. Decaying and/or repeatedly self-interacting closed loops of these ``$B-L$'' cosmic strings can be a non-thermal source of heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos whose decay can contribute to the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe (BAU) via the leptogenesis route. The $B-L$ cosmic strings are expected in GUT models such as SO(10), where they can be formed at an intermediate stage of symmetry breaking well below the GUT scale $\sim 10^{16}$ GeV; such light strings are not excluded by the CMB anisotropy data and may well exist. We estimate the contribution of $B-L$ cosmic string loops to the baryon-to-photon ratio of the Universe in the light of current knowledge on neutrino masses and mixings implied by atmospheric and solar neutrino measurements. We find that $B-L$ cosmic string loops can contribute significantly to the BAU for $U(1)_{B-L}$ symmetry breaking scale $\eta_{B-L}\gsim 1.7\times 10^{11}\gev$. At the same time, in order for the contribution of decaying $B-L$ cosmic string loops not to exceed the observed baryon-to-photon ratio inferred from the recent WMAP results, the lightest heavy right-handed Majorana neutrino mass $M_1$ must satisfy the constraint $M_1 \leq 2.4 \times 10^{12}(\eta_{B-L}/10^{13}\gev)^{1/2}\gev$. This may have interesting implications for the associated Yukawa couplings in the heavy neutrino sector and consequently for the light neutrino masses generated through see-saw mechanism.
[29]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0403299  [pdf] - 114708
On The Injection Spectrum of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays in the Top-Down Scenario
Comments: Minor changes, added a reference, version to appear in Phys. Rev. D
Submitted: 2004-03-31, last modified: 2004-05-13
We analyze the uncertainties involved in obtaining the injection spectra of UHECR particles in the top-down scenario of their origin. We show that the DGLAP $Q^2$ evolution of fragmentation functions (FF) to $Q=M_X$ (mass of the X particle) from their initial values at low $Q$ is subject to considerable uncertainties. We therefore argue that, for $x\lsim 0.1$ (the $x$ region of interest for most large $M_X$ values of interest, $x\equiv 2E/M_X$ being the scaled energy variable), the FF obtained from DGLAP evolution is no more reliable than that provided, for example, by a simple Gaussian form (in the variable $\ln(1/x)$) obtained under the Modified Leading Log Approximation (MLLA). Additionally, we find that for $x\gsim0.1$, the evolution in $Q^2$ of the singlet FF, which determines the injection spectrum, is ``minimal'' -- the singlet FF changes by barely a factor of 2 after evolving it over $\sim$ 14 orders of magnitude in $Q\sim M_X$. We, therefore, argue that as long as the measurement of the UHECR spectrum above $\sim10^{20}\ev$ is going to remain uncertain by a factor of 2 or larger, it is good enough for most practical purposes to directly use any one of the available initial parametrisations of the FFs in the $x$ region $x\gsim0.1$ based on low energy data even without evolving them to the requisite $Q^2$ value.
[30]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0211165  [pdf] - 52900
Detectability of Prompt TeV Gamma Rays of Proton Synchrotron Origin from Gamma Ray Bursts by AMANDA/ICECUBE Detectors
Comments: 37 pages Latex including 9 ps figures, title and abstract slightly changed to reflect more faithfully the content, some minor changes in text, one extra section and new references added, figures 6--9 replotted with correct muon threshold of ICECUBE following referee's suggestion, version accepted for publication in Astroparticle Physics
Submitted: 2002-11-08, last modified: 2003-05-12
The detectability of a possible ``high'' energy ($>100\gev$) component of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) using AMANDA/ICECUBE large area muon detectors is examined within the context of a specific model of such high energy gamma ray production within GRBs, namely, the proton-synchrotron model, which requires protons to be accelerated to ultrahigh energies $\gsim10^{20}\ev$ within GRBs. In this model, the high energy component is distinct from, but may well be emitted in coincidence with, the usual ``low'' (keV--MeV) energy component observed by satellite-borne detectors. The AMANDA/ICECUBE detectors can detect TeV photons by detecting the secondary muons created by the TeV photons in the Earth's atmosphere. We calculate the muon signal to noise ratio in these detectors due to TeV gamma-rays from individual GRBs for various assumptions on their luminosity, distance (redshift), Lorentz Gamma factor of the underlying fireball model, and various spectral characteristics of the GRBs, including the effect of the absorption of TeV photons within the GRB as well as in the intergalactic infrared radiation background. The intergalactic absorption effect essentially precludes detection of TeV photons in the AMANDA detector for reasonable values of the luminosity in the high energy component, but they may well be detectable in the proposed ICECUBE detector which may have an effective area for downward-going muons a factor of 100 larger than that in AMANDA. However, even in ICECUBE, only relatively close-by GRBs at redshifts $< 0.05$ or so can be expected to be detectable with any reasonable degree of confidence. We discuss the requirement on the luminosity of the GRB in the high energy component for its detectability in ICECUBE.
[31]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0305185  [pdf] - 56658
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays and Prompt TeV Gamma Rays from Gamma Ray Bursts
Comments: 3 pages Latex including 1 ps figure, invited parallel session talk given at the IXth International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology (PASCOS-03), TIFR, Mumbai, India, Jan 2003, to appear in the proceedings to be published as a special issue of Pramana -- Jour. of Physics, style files included
Submitted: 2003-05-12
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) have been proposed as one {\it possible} class of sources of the Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Ray (UHECR) events observed up to energies $\gsim10^{20}\ev$. The synchrotron radiation of the highest energy protons accelerated within the GRB source should produce gamma rays up to TeV energies. Here we briefly discuss the implications on the energetics of the GRB from the point of view of the detectability of the prompt TeV gamma rays of proton-synchrotron origin in GRBs in the up-coming ICECUBE muon detector in the south pole.
[32]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0108311  [pdf] - 44287
Detecting TeV Gamma Rays from Gamma Ray Bursts by Ground Based Muon Detectors
Comments: 27pages, 9 figures
Submitted: 2001-08-20
The possibility of detecting Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB) in TeV energy range using large area muon detectors like AMANDA and Lake Baikal detector is examined. These detectors can detect TeV energy photons by detecting the secondary muons created by the TeV photons in the Earth's atmosphere. We calculate the expected number of muons and the signal to square root of noise ratios in these detectors due to TeV gamma-rays from individual GRBs for various assumption on their luminosity, distance from the observer (redshift), gamma-ray integral spectral index, maximum energy cutoff of the photon spectrum and duration including the effect of the absorption of TeV photons in the intergalactic infrared radiation background. We also calculate the expected rate of detectable TeV-GRB events in these detectors using a recent determination of the luminosity and redshift distributions of GRBs in the Universe.
[33]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811011  [pdf] - 881039
Origin and Propagation of Extremely High Energy Cosmic Rays
Comments: 148 latex pages in tight format, 30 postscript-files and two gif-files for fig4.14 and fig4.15 included, uses epsf.sty. Considerably updated version of review to appear in Physics Reports. Links and color ps version of fig4.14 and fig4.15 at http://astro.uchicago.edu/home/web/sigl/physrep.html
Submitted: 1998-11-01, last modified: 1999-08-23
Cosmic ray particles with energies in excess of 10**(20) eV have been detected. The sources as well as the physical mechanism(s) responsible for endowing cosmic ray particles with such enormous energies are unknown. This report gives a review of the physics and astrophysics associated with the questions of origin and propagation of these Extremely High Energy (EHE) cosmic rays in the Universe. After a brief review of the observed cosmic rays in general and their possible sources and acceleration mechanisms, a detailed discussion is given of possible "top-down" (non-acceleration) scenarios of origin of EHE cosmic rays through decay of sufficiently massive particles originating from processes in the early Universe. The massive particles can come from collapse and/or annihilation of cosmic topological defects (such as monopoles, cosmic strings, etc.) associated with Grand Unified Theories or they could be some long-lived metastable supermassive relic particles that were created in the early Universe and are decaying in the current epoch. The highest energy end of the cosmic ray spectrum can thus be used as a probe of new fundamental physics beyond Standard Model. We discuss the role of existing and proposed cosmic ray, gamma-ray and neutrino experiments in this context. We also discuss how observations with next generation experiments of images and spectra of EHE cosmic ray sources can be used to obtain new information on Galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields and possibly their origin.
[34]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/9809242  [pdf] - 116313
Probing Grand Unified Theories with Cosmic Ray, Gamma-Ray and Neutrino Astrophysics
Comments: 15 latex pages, 5 postscript figures included, uses revtex.sty and psfig.sty. Submitted to Physical Review D
Submitted: 1998-09-02
We explore scenarios where the highest energy cosmic rays are produced by new particle physics near the grand unification scale. Using detailed numerical simulations of extragalactic nucleon, gamma-ray, and neutrino propagation, we show the existence of an interesting parameter range for which such scenarios may explain part of the data and are consistent with all observational constraints. A combination of proposed observatories for ultra-high energy cosmic rays, neutrino telescopes of a few kilometer scale, and gamma-ray astrophysics instruments should be able to test these scenarios. In particular, for neutrino masses in the eV range, exclusive neutrino decay modes of superheavy particles can give rise to neutrino fluxes comparable to those predicted in models of active galactic nuclei.
[35]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/9803223  [pdf] - 116183
Cosmic Topological Defects, Highest Energy Cosmic Rays, and the Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe
Comments: 4 pages, RevTex, no figures, discussions and references added, other minor changes, version to appear in Phys. Rev. Lett
Submitted: 1998-03-02, last modified: 1998-06-04
It is pointed out that the observed extremely high energy cosmic rays (EHECR) above $10^{11}$ GeV and the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe (BAU), both may have a common origin in baryon number violating decays of supermassive ``X'' particles released from cosmic topological defects (TDs) such as cosmic strings and monopoles. The X particles produced by TDs in the recent epochs produce the EHECR, while the BAU is created by X particles released from TDs mainly in the very early Universe. In this scenario the EHECR is predicted to contain baryons as well as antibaryons with a small asymmetry between the two.
[36]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/9710533  [pdf] - 358361
TeV and Superheavy Mass-Scale Particles from Supersymmetric Topological Defects, the Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background, and the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays
Comments: 4 pages, Revtex, includes 1 figure, major changes in text, arguments made more general, main conclusions unchanged, version accepted for publication in PRL
Submitted: 1997-10-29, last modified: 1998-03-04
Cosmic topological defects in a wide class of supersymmetric theories can simultaneously be sources of higgs particles of mass comparable to the supersymmetry breaking scale $\sim$ TeV, as well as superheavy gauge bosons of mass $\sim\eta$, where $\eta$ (>> 1 TeV) denotes the associated gauge symmetry breaking scale. For cosmic strings with $\eta\sim 10^{14}$ GeV, the higgs decay can account for the extragalactic diffuse gamma ray background above $\sim$ 10 GeV, while the gauge boson decay may explain the highest energy cosmic ray flux above $\sim 10^{11}$ GeV, provided that particle production is the dominant energy loss mechanism for cosmic strings, as recent simulations suggest. By the same token, cosmic strings with $\eta$ much above $\sim 10^{14}$ GeV will be ruled out.
[37]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9803029  [pdf] - 100564
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays from Topological Defects --- Cosmic Strings, Monopoles, Necklaces, and All That
Comments: Latex, 27 pages, including 1 ps fig. Invited talk given at the Workshop on ``Observing the Highest Energy Particles ($ > 10^{20}$ eV) from Space'', College Park, Maryland, USA, November 13 -- 15, 1997, to be published in the proceedings (AIP)
Submitted: 1998-03-03
The topological defect scenario of origin of the observed highest energy cosmic rays is reviewed. Under a variety of circumstances, topological defects formed in the early Universe can be sources of very massive particles in the Universe today. The decay products of these massive particles may be responsible for the observed highest energy cosmic ray particles above $10^{20}$ eV. Some massive particle production processes involving cosmic strings and magnetic monopoles are discussed. We also discuss the implications of results of certain recent numerical simulations of evolution of cosmic strings. These results (which remain to be confirmed by independent simulations) seem to show that massive particle production may be a generic feature of cosmic strings, which would make cosmic strings an inevitable source of extremely high energy cosmic rays with potentially detectable flux. At the same time, cosmic strings are severely constrained by the observed cosmic ray flux above $10^{20}$ eV, if massive particle radiation is the dominant energy loss mechanism for cosmic strings.
[38]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9608051  [pdf] - 95169
Reply to Comment on ``Dispersion Velocity of Galactic Dark Matter Particles'' by Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132)
Comments: 3 pages, RevTex, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett
Submitted: 1996-08-10
Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 76, p.3886 (1996); astro-ph/9605001). We clarify these issues and show that our results are robust, and there is no inconsistency of our results with any established observational facts.
[39]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9608035  [pdf] - 95153
Reply to Comment on ``Dispersion Velocity of Galactic Dark Matter Particles'' by Evans (astro-ph/9606155)
Comments: 4 pages, RevTex, 1 figure included, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett
Submitted: 1996-08-08
In a recent Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett, Vol 76, p 3886 (1996); astro-ph/9605001) Evans (astro-ph/9606155) has raised some issues concerning the specific choice of the distribution function used in our calculation. He has also raised questions concerning the numerical validity of our results. We clarify these issues and show that Evans's criticisms are unfounded and that our results are robust and remain unaffected.
[40]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9605001  [pdf] - 94557
The Dispersion Velocity of Galactic Dark Matter Particles
Comments: RevTex, 4 pages, 1 ps figure, accepted for publication in Physical Review Letters
Submitted: 1996-04-30
The self-consistent spatial distribution of particles of Galactic dark matter is derived including their own gravitational potential, as also that of the visible matter of the Galaxy. In order to reproduce the observed rotation curve of the Galaxy the value of the dispersion velocity of the dark matter particles, $\rmsveldm$, should be $\sim 600\kmps$ or larger.
[41]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9506118  [pdf] - 92908
A Break in the Highest Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum: A Signature of New Physics?
Comments: 12 latex pages, 2 figures added via figures command
Submitted: 1995-06-22
Recent experimental data from the Fly's Eye and the Akeno array seem to indicate significant structure in the ultrahigh energy cosmic ray spectrum above $10^{18}\eV$. A statistically significant dip has been established at about $5\times10^{18}\eV$. In addition, each experiment observed a different superhigh energy event above $10^{20}\eV$ separated from the rest of the data by about half a decade in energy. In this article we discuss what this implies for the existence or non-existence of the ``Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuz'min cutoff'', a long lasting and still open question in cosmic ray physics. This cutoff, caused by energy losses in the cosmic microwave background, is predicted to occur at a few times $10^{19}\eV$ if cosmic rays are produced by shock acceleration of lower energy particles at extragalactic distances. We show that from the spectral point of view, sources nearer than a few $\Mpc$ are still consistent with the data at the $1\sigma$ level, provided these sources accelerate particles beyond $3\times10^{20}\eV$. However, persistence of the apparent gap in the existing data at the level of a 4 times higher total exposure would rule out a wide range of acceleration models at $98\%$ C.L., whether they rely on nearby or extragalactic sources. This might hint to the existence of a ``top down'' mechanism which produces an additional hard component of ultrahigh energy particles directly, say, by decay from some higher energy scale in contrast to bottom up acceleration of charged particles. In this scenario a cutoff followed by a pronounced spectral flattening and possibly even a gap could naturally be formed.
[42]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9412053  [pdf] - 92152
Monopole Annihilation and Highest Energy Cosmic Rays
Comments: 26 pages of uuencoded compressed postscript, including 6 figures
Submitted: 1994-12-15
Cosmic rays with energies exceeding $10^{20}\eV$ have been detected. The origin of these highest energy cosmic rays remains unknown. Established astrophysical acceleration mechanisms encounter severe difficulties in accelerating particles to these energies. Alternative scenarios where these particles are created by the decay of cosmic topological defects have been suggested in literature. In this paper we study the possibility of producing the highest energy cosmic rays through a process that involves formation of metastable magnetic monopole-antimonopole bound states and their subsequent collapse. The annihilation of the heavy monopole-antimonopole pairs constituting the monopolonia can produce energetic nucleons, gamma rays and neutrinos whose expected flux we estimate and discuss in relation to experimental data so far available. The monopoles we consider are the ones that could be produced in the early universe during a phase transition at the grand unification energy scale. We find that observable cosmic ray fluxes can be produced with monopole abundances compatible with present bounds.
[43]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9403039  [pdf] - 250303
On the Origin of Highest Energy Cosmic Rays
Comments: 19 LATEX pages, 3 figures available upon request from G. Sigl (sigl@oddjob.uchicago.edu)
Submitted: 1994-03-17
In this paper we show that the conventional diffusive shock acceleration mechanism for cosmic rays associated with relativistic astrophysical shocks in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) has severe difficulties to explain the highest energy cosmic ray events. We show that protons above around $2\times10^{20}\eV$ could have marginally been produced by this mechanism in an AGN or a rich galaxy cluster not further away than around $100\Mpc$. However, for the highest energy Fly's Eye and Yakutsk events this is inconsistent with the observed arrival directions. Galactic and intergalactic magnetic fields appear unable to alter the direction of such energetic particles by more than a few degrees. We also discuss some other options for these events associated with relativistic particles including pulsar acceleration of high $Z$ nuclei. At the present stage of knowledge the concept of topological defects left over from the early universe as the source for such events appears to be a promising option. Such sources are discussed and possible tests of this hypothesis are proposed.